The New York Times

Dunkirk, the War and the Amnesia of the Empire

TWO AND A HALF MILLION INDIANS FOUGHT ALONGSIDE THE BRITISH IN WORLD WAR II BUT ARE LEFT OUT OF ACCOUNTS LIKE CHRISTOPHER NOLAN’S FILM ‘DUNKIRK.’

OXFORD, England — Two and a half million soldiers drawn from Britain’s empire in South Asia fought in World War II. But they are missing from many British commemorations and accounts of the war — an absence reinforced by Christopher Nolan’s new film “Dunkirk,” which does not feature any of the Indian soldiers who were present at the battle.

The Indian soldiers at Dunkirk

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times5 min readFood & Wine
The Keto Diet Is Popular, but Is It Good for You?
Low-carb, high-fat eating can lead to weight loss, but scientists debate the long-term effects on health.
The New York Times4 min readPolitics
Who's to Blame When Algorithms Discriminate?
(The Upshot) When the Fair Housing Act was passed in 1968, the injustice it aimed to root out in the housing market was often egregious: Real estate agents steered black families away from white neighborhoods; landlords refused to rent to them; and p
The New York Times3 min read
How to Plan In Case Things Go Wrong
NOTHING BAD IS GOING TO HAPPEN WHILE YOU’RE ON VACATION ... PROBABLY. Ten days into what would have been two months in South America, I broke my leg in two places. I was deep in Chile, a country whose language I didn’t speak, and I’d just booked fli