The Christian Science Monitor

'Grant' vigorously portrays its subject as a great military leader, champion of rights, honest man

The conventional wisdom about Ulysses S. Grant is that he was a first-rate general and a fourth-rate president. Indeed, historians and political scientists have traditionally labeled his two terms in office as a “failure” or close to it. But that legacy is being reassessed. 

In recent years, two historians – Jean Edward Smith and Ronald White – have authored well-received books which argued that Grant was, in fact, a great military leader and a better president than we realize. That argument has been vigorously and extensively expanded in , a magnificent book by distinguished biographer Ron Chernow. Indeed, after reading this deeply researched and superbly written volume, the reader will understand why Walt Whitman put Grant,

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor2 min readPolitics
Saving Dignity Of Equality In Hong Kong
If the territory’s officials can punish the pro-China thugs who attacked peaceful protesters on Sunday, it will show rule of law can be applied equally, unlike in the mainland’s version of justice.
The Christian Science Monitor3 min read
He Knew About Climate Change In 1799. What Can We Learn?
Andrea Wulf and Lillian Melcher’s “The Adventures of Alexander von Humboldt” follows a prescient naturalist’s voyages in South America.
The Christian Science Monitor6 min readPolitics
‘Hostage Diplomacy’ Spat Between China And Canada Hits Home
China’s arrests of two Canadians, which followed the arrest of a Huawei executive in Vancouver, have some people rethinking their dealings in China.