The Christian Science Monitor

Supreme Court ruling has 'huge' implications for voting rights

In a decision split along ideological lines, the United States Supreme Court Monday overturned almost entirely a lower court ruling that had invalidated several political districts in Texas for harming the voting power of racial minorities.

These final weeks of the Supreme Court’s term have been defined by narrow technical rulings in contentious cases on issues such as partisan gerrymandering and religious liberty. Today’s decision on racial gerrymandering in Texas veers from that pattern, experts say. Less than two years away from a new round of redistricting, it could have significant implications for voting rights lawsuits.

“There was a lot of evidence of discriminatory intent in the [Texas] map that the [high] court sort of ignored,” says Michael Li, a senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, “and today’s ruling shows a huge presumption of good faith even in

Lower court ‘critically flawed’‘What’s the use of Section 3?’States following suit?

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor3 min read
Why The U.S. High School Dropout Rate Has Fallen So Dramatically
U.S. high school dropout rates have fallen by nearly two-thirds in 18 years, thanks to investments in education and workforce degree requirements.
The Christian Science Monitor1 min read
The War On Plastic Bags, By The Numbers
Plastic bag bans are sweeping the globe. But it’s too soon to tell how effective they are keeping single use plastic out of landfills and the ocean.
The Christian Science Monitor6 min readPolitics
How President Trump Became The GOP’s ‘New Normal’
President Donald Trump called for a group of Democratic congresswomen of color to “go back” to their countries, though all but one are U.S.-born.