The New York Times

Why Sex Is Not Binary

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

THE COMPLEXITY IS MORE THAN CULTURAL. IT’S BIOLOGICAL, TOO.

Two sexes have never been enough to describe human variety. Not in biblical times and not now. Before we knew much about biology, we made social rules to administer sexual diversity. The ancient Jewish rabbinical code known as the Tosefta, for example, sometimes treated people who had male and female parts (such as testes and a vagina) as women — they could not inherit property or serve as priests; at other times, as men — forbidding them from shaving or being

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times7 min readPolitics
Huge Turnout Is Expected in 2020. So Which Party Would Benefit?
The 2020 presidential election is poised to have the highest turnout in a century, with the potential to reshape the composition of the electorate in a decisive way. But perhaps surprisingly, it is not obvious which party would benefit. There are opp
The New York Times5 min readScience
The Sad Truth About Sleep-Tracking Devices and Apps
For the last two weeks, I’ve added an extra step to my bedtime routine: strapping a computer around my wrist. The new nightly move was prompted by a cascade of wearable gadgets from companies like Fitbit and Apple, which claim that their sensor-laden
The New York Times6 min read
Chance the Rapper Really, Really Loves 'The Lion King'
The rapper discusses the 1994 film’s impact on his life and his involvement in the 2019 remake.