Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Theological Origins of Modernity
    The Theological Origins of Modernity
    The Theological Origins of Modernity
    Ebook387 pages10 hours

    The Theological Origins of Modernity

    By Michael Allen Gillespie

    4/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Exposing the religious roots of our ostensibly godless age, Michael Allen Gillespie reveals in this landmark study that modernity is much less secular than conventional wisdom suggests. Taking as his starting point the collapse of the medieval world, Gillespie argues that from the very beginning moderns sought not to eliminate religion but to support a new view of religion and its place in human life. He goes on to explore the ideas of such figures as William of Ockham, Petrarch, Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, and Hobbes, showing that modernity is best understood as a series of attempts to formulate a new and coherent metaphysics or theology.

    “Bringing the history of political thought up to date and situating it against the backdrop of contemporary events, Gillespie’s analyses provide us a way to begin to have conversations with the Islamic world about what is perhaps the central question within each of the three monotheistic religions: if God is omnipotent, then what is the place of human freedom?”—Joshua Mitchell, Georgetown University

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
    Release dateSep 15, 2008
    ISBN9780226293516
    The Theological Origins of Modernity

    Read more from Michael Allen Gillespie

    Related to The Theological Origins of Modernity

    Related ebooks

    Philosophy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Rome Vs. Chicago

      Jan 31, 2019

      Rome Vs. Chicago
      3 min read

    • Article

      Why Science Should Stay Clear of Metaphysics: Meet the philosopher who revived anti-realism.

      Sep 8, 2016

      Philosophers of science are not known for agreeing with each other—contrariness is part of the job description. But for thousands of years, from Aristotle to Thomas Kuhn, those who study what science is have roughly categorized themselves into two ba

      11 min read

    • Article

      The End of Liberalism

      Jun 4, 2018

      The End of Liberalism
      7 min read

    • Article

      Excerpt

      Dec 12, 2023

      “The general and accepted meaning of the Enlightenment today is that it was a great leap forward in the capacity of humans to control nature, generate wealth and direct their own destinies. It was, so the story goes, a crowning feat of progress and r

      2 min read

    • Article

      Searching For Sense Amid Chaos

      Sep 28, 2023

      EVER SINCE THE POLITICAL STRATEGIST Steve Bannon mentioned, vaguely and dubiously, “Julius Evola and different writers of the early twentieth century who are really the supporters of what’s called the Traditionalist movement, which really kind of eve

      4 min read

    • Article

      We Need To Reframe The Way We Thinkabout “Free Speech”

      Jun 29, 2023

      NO IDEA IS MORE LOATHED TODAY, especially on the Right (how times change), than censorship. Nothing is worse, we are told, than being “censorious”, and seeking to end “vigorous debate” in the “marketplace of ideas”. But what exactly ensures that a de

      11 min read

    • Article

      'Enlightenment Now' Says Human Progress Is Real, Remarkable, And Yet Often Unacknowledged

      Feb 27, 2018

      Steven Pinker marshals data from detailed studies that show the stirring extent of progress human beings have achieved since the 18th century.

      4 min read

    • Article

      The Wisdom Of The Old Traditions

      Jun 24, 2021

      THE MODERN WORLD IS ON autopilot. We busy ourselves with frivolous entertainment — chain-dating included — and the fanatical pursuit of material gain. We slog away, neglecting family and friends, and burn ourselves out young. Rarely, if ever, do we s

      4 min read

    • Article

      Finding Real Answers

      Apr 27, 2023

      MAY IN WESTMINSTER SEES SPRING, blossom and the National Conservatism Conference. This movement has its origins in the work of, among others, the philosophers Yoram Hazony and, here in the UK, James Orr. It raises the most fundamental questions of ou

      1 min read

    • Article

      Uncommon Decency

      Mar 14, 2021

      In a world in which toxic exchanges grab global headlines, two unlikely ancient adversaries have shone a light on the alternative approach: mutual tolerance and continued dialogue. Catholicism’s leader, Pope Francis, has risked his life, not least fr

      3 min read

    • Article

      A Crisis Of Truths

      Jan 27, 2022

      A Crisis Of Truths
      9 min read

    • Article

      Evolution The Big Liee

      Oct 2, 2020

      Evolution The Big Liee
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Conspirasphere

      Dec 2, 2021

      The Conspirasphere
      3 min read

    • Article

      All Sweetness And Light

      Nov 24, 2022

      All Sweetness And Light
      8 min read

    • Article

      The Myth of Rationality

      Mar 17, 2021

      Many years ago, I worked as a counsellor on a program that provided support to the families of sex offenders. In practice, that usually meant working with the wives of men convicted of child sexual offences. You might expect that my job would have co

      8 min read

    • Article

      Unintended Consequences

      May 29, 2022

      Unintended Consequences
      10 min read

    • Article

      Emergence of A Technological Society

      Mar 26, 2020

      The author is professor of politics and director of the International Graduate Program in Politics at East China Normal University in Shanghai The emphasis on developing science and technology and closing the gap that had emerged historically between

      5 min read

    • Article

      Losing Faith

      Dec 25, 2023

      Losing Faith
      5 min read

    • Article

      4 Defining ourselves

      Jan 29, 2019

      4 Defining ourselves
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Last Victorian Sage

      Jan 2, 2020

      The Last Victorian Sage
      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Theological Origins of Modernity

    4/5

    6 ratings3 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      A reconceptualization of the history and development of modernity.The author envisions modernity in terms of a turn toward the natural to explain the tensions of the divine and human relationship according to a nominalist foundation. He sees the advancement of nominalism as the end of the legitimacy of the perceived coherence of Scholasticism, itself an attempt to make sense of an Aristotelian view of the world in light of the previous Neoplatonic/Christian synthesis that had developed in late antiquity. The author explores the life and thought of Petrarch, Luther, Descartes, and Hobbes; he sees in a potential chance meeting in Avignon in the late 13th century the three paths that would attempt to be charted through the challenges of nominalism (Ockham and divine determinism, Petrarch and humanism, Eckhart and mysticism); in the end, the author charts the irreconcilable conflict inherent in any attempt to make sense of the universe on a nominalist basis between divine sovereignty and human freedom, seen explicitly in Erasmus vs. Luther, through nature but still present in Descartes vs. Hobbes, and he then argues that the conflict remains in modern secularism even though elements of the divine are now infused in both humanity and nature. The problem remains: progressivism vs. dystopia. Attempts to make sense of nominalism led to humanism, the scientific revolution, and ultimately modernism, and yet modernism has run aground on this irreconcilable conflict which has manifested itself throughout the process. This is ironic since modernity claims to have no need for the past and has, in its own mind, disabused itself of its religiosity. The author has done well to expose to modern man just how dependent he is on the Christian tradition, how much his views and philosophy has been shaped by the attempt to grapple with nominalist principles which he still shares in large part, and the ultimate failure of the endeavor, since modernity proves as feeble as previous syntheses in terms of maintaining coherence in a valid way. A welcome shifting of perspective to make sense of the philosophical developments of the past millennium and their impact on our world today.
    • 5/5
      "The Theological Origins of Modernity" is an ambitious project on the topic that many people have attempted (and most of them failed by different degrees) to cover authoritatively. For what my opinion is worth, Gillespie manages to pull it off rather remarkably. It deserves to be kept in mind that his approach is necessarily limited - for the book does not purport to give an explanation and genealogy of *everything*. Although Gillespie is clearly a talented writer, and goes an extra mile to make the text accessible for a broad audience, the book remains a challenging read. He clearly does have his own ideas and agenda and, regardless of the argumentation being generally very well balanced, is not shy to spell out his own conclusions or let his personal sympathies shine through. But even if you don't agree with the conclusions drawn or approaches used, you will in all likelihood end up learning a lot. Well worth the effort.
    • 4/5
      Modernity, broadly understood as a “realm of individualism, of representation of subjectivity, of exploration and discovery, of freedom, rights, toleration, liberalism, and the nation state,” is often assumed to be rooted in a growing hostility toward, or at least indifference to, theological ideas. Michael Allen Gillespie, a professor of political science and philosophy at Duke University, uses this book to argue against this point. Rather than a disengagement from theological discourse, he suggests modernity has actually been a completely different set of answers to questions that we would recognize as explicitly theological.He begins his discussion by going all the way back to medieval Scholasticism, and in particular looking at the rift between Scholastic realism (or universalism) and nominalism. Scholasticism was dominated by realist thought, which said that everything in the world was merely a kind of Platonic simulacra of the only thing that was real – the perfectly rational, divine mind of God. During the early fourteenth century, William of Ockham became one of the most outspoken opponents against realism and for a position known as nominalism. Nominalism rejected the central position of realism, and suggested that such a divine reason which human beings could access and understand didn’t even exist in the first place. (Ockham was not, for clarity’s sake, proposing atheism. He was instead saying that the mind of God was something so distant from the frailties of the human intellect that we will never understand it – i.e., the deus absconditus of Martin Luther.) This got him into a lot of trouble with Pope John XXII, who eventually excommunicated him. The important thing to take away from Gillespie’s discussion of Ockham is that Scholasticism’s marriage of the human and divine intellect is ruptured by nominalism, which “replaced it with a chaos of radically different beings” and focused on a God of extreme will and omnipotence instead of one whose rational mind was reflected in the perfection of nature.The rest of the book is taken up with how these ideas have been taken up in subsequent thinkers. The first person Gillespie understands as being in conversation with Ockhamite nominalism is Petrarch, Ockham’s contemporary. Petrarch’s idea of the moral life is one, starkly in contrast with Aristotle’s conception of the zoon politikon, pursued mostly in private conflicts drastically with the Roman authors, especially Cicero, whose lives and works he so cherished and revived. His several books, including “Rerum Memorandum” (“Memorable Things”) and “Africa,” an epic poem presenting the parallel lives of Scipio, Caesar, and Hannibal, serve to detail his ideas in these respects.Next, Gillespie moves on to give a rather conventional account of Renaissance humanism and some of its major figures, including Machiavelli, Salutati, Ficino, Pico della Mirandola, and Erasmus. He argues, very much in line with mainstream historical understanding, that these humanists placed an emphasis (or, as Gillespie phrases it, “ontic priority”) on human reason and cognitive faculties, rather than a divine being, even though almost none of the memorable humanists concluded anything like atheism. Much of the rest of the book discusses two pairs of thinkers, and uses each pair to compare and contrast the influences of nominalism and humanism that each offered. The first of these pairs is Luther and Erasmus. Gillespie never assumes too much of the reader, and therefore spends quite a bit of time giving introductory information about each of these. He suggests that both, but especially Luther, were influenced by nominalism and therefore God’s radical separation from man. He sums up the differences and similarities between the two thus: “…modernity proper was born out of and in reaction to this conflict [the debate between Luther and Erasmus], as an effort to find a new approach to the world that was not entangled in the contradictions of humanism and the Reformation. To this end, thinkers such as Bacon, Descartes, and Hobbes sought a new beginning that gave priority not to man or to God but to nature, that sought to understand the world not as a product of a Promethean human freedom or of a radically omnipotent divine will but of the mechanical motion of matter. Modernity in this sense was the result of an ontic revolution within metaphysics that accepted the ontological ground that nominalism established but that saw the other realms of being through this new naturalistic lens” (p. 132). Gillespie then goes on to discuss the second pair, Descartes and Hobbes, and their relative understanding of physics, human psychology, and epistemology. He gives a heavily historical account of their thought refracted through personal and biographical experiences. Gillespie’s last chapter discusses some more ideas of modernity, including those of Kant (“Sapere aude!”), Hegel, and the German Romantics. One of the most interesting ideas he talks about here is how Heidegger formulated this problem, namely not one as a de-theologizing or secularization, but as God becoming increasing “concealed” or “withdrawn” from public discourse. I’ve always found Heidegger an enigmatic, but fully rigorous thinker and thought that this was an interesting way to resituate an extraordinarily complex historical question.There are a couple of critical things I have to offer about the book. I find it perhaps not flatly wrong, but at least odd, to suggest that much of the above thought is explicitly answering theological questions. To say that “The Enlightenment was all about theology, because many of its thinkers disavowed theism” seems to be self-consciously defining a movement negatively, instead of taking its real, central concerns to heart. Could one not just as easily write a book called “The Platonic Origins of Modernity,” arguing how all of modernity was a response to the Platonic forms? This shouldn’t detract someone from the book, though, especially if they’re interested in a great synthetic treatment of all these thinkers backed up by solid historical and philosophical understanding. I may not have agreed with all of Gillespie’s conclusions, but this book offers up a lot of questions for anyone with a soft spot for intellectual history.

    Book preview

    The Theological Origins of Modernity - Michael Allen Gillespie

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1