Найдите свой следующий любимый книге

Станьте участником сегодня и читайте бесплатно в течение 30 дней
Under an Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown

Under an Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown

Автором Elana Freeland

Читать отрывок

Under an Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown

Автором Elana Freeland

1/5 (1 оценка)
633 pages
9 hours
Feb 13, 2018


  • Elana Freeland is a relentless prosletyzer. She maintains websites and social media chat groups with thousands of active participants. Her work has positioned her as the leading expert on counter-vailing theories of climate change.
  • With the election of Trump, outsider prespectives are becoming more relevant to those seeking non-mainstream expertise. Freeland’s work will appeal to those sceptics.
  • Her previous book, Chemtrails, is a highly-rated seller and those readers will be energized by Under and Ionized Sky; a continuation of the Chemtrails story.
  • Издатель:
    Feb 13, 2018

    Об авторе

    Связано с Under an Ionized Sky

    Похоже на «Книги»
    Похожие статьи

    Предварительный просмотр книги

    Under an Ionized Sky - Elana Freeland



    Project Cloverleaf

    Controlling the weather has been a goal of industrialists for 150 years or more. But it was not until the availability of vast numbers of jet aircraft that made it possible to replace huge sections of the atmosphere with chemicals to control the flow of air and moisture. This is not advanced technology but more like farming the sky with a million tractors. True advanced technology would not require aerosols to produce climate change. It’s brute force climate manipulation for which secrecy cannot be maintained without threatening the potential whistleblower. Now that the public has increasingly realized the climate change cover-up, the media looks more and more foolish in their attempt to protect the masters.

    — Harold Saive, chemtrailplanet.net

    As early as 1990, weather force specialists at the U.S. Air Force Academy were hard at work studying how to chemically mix and lay aerial obscuration they called chemtrails. Project Cloverleaf began quietly enough (as all classified projects do) with the 1994 Hughes Aircraft patent for Welsbach Seeding For Reduction of Global Warming. Welsbach seeding called for spreading highly reflective materials in the atmosphere to reflect back into space 1–2 percent of incoming sunlight and thus slow down global warming. However, it was also about beginning to create a more conductive atmosphere in preparation for Bernard Eastlund’s High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) already under construction in Alaska. The reflective material (~10 microns) to be added to jet auxiliary fuel tanks was the highly conductive compound aluminum oxide (Al2O3). The jet’s main tanks would be reserved for takeoff and landing, and the auxiliary loaded with Al2O3 for cruising altitude. Lawrence Livermore National Labs priced the program at US$1 billion per annum (in 1994 dollars).

    By the late 1990s, aerial grids were being laid over chosen regions and cities of the U.S. and other NATO nations. In 1996, the military went public with two documents that obliquely referenced what Cloverleaf was up to: the Pentagon paper Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 in Air Force 2025,¹ which called the chemical whitening effect cirrus shielding; and U.S. Space Command’s Vision for 2020 calling for full spectrum dominance of space, land, sea, and air.²

    Air traffic controllers (ATC) at major airports were coached to re-route commercial air traffic around military craft engaged in classified aerial operations at 37,000–40,000 feet. ATC radar revealed a haze of aluminum and barium—Al2O3 for solar radiation management (SRM) geoengineering, barium stearate Ba(C18H35O2)2 for lubrication, radar imaging, and high-powered RF-microwave beam weapons.

    A wide range of particles could be released into the stratosphere to achieve the SRM objective of scattering sunlight back to space. Sulfates and nanoparticles currently favored for SRM include sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, black carbon, and specially engineered discs composed of metallic aluminum, aluminum oxide and barium titanate. In particular, engineered nanoparticles are considered very promising. The particles would utilize photophoretic and electromagnetic forces to self-levitate above the stratosphere. These nanoparticles would remain suspended longer than sulfate particles, would not interfere with stratospheric chemistry, and would not produce acid rain. However, while promising, the self-levitating nanodisc has not been tested to verify efficacy, may increase ocean acidification due to atmospheric CO2 entrapment, has uncharacterized human health and environmental impacts, and may be prohibitively expensive.³

    The truth is that the 10 billion SRM discs 10 micrometers across and 50 nanometers thick are engineered with a core of aluminum, a top layer of aluminum oxide, and a bottom layer of barium titanate—aluminum to reflect heat up, heavier barium purportedly to push the discs up (photophoresis). Introduce a magnetic component, then spray, and the nanoparticles will follow the Earth’s magnetic field into the upper atmosphere.

    By 1998, the Ontario Ministry of Environment (Canada) found 7X the safe limit for aluminum in rainwater samples. More and more citizens complained of sudden headaches, joint pains, dizziness, fatigue, acute asthma, gastrointestinal pain, coughs, and feverless flu symptoms.

    In 2000, Cloverleaf went public in an offhand way with a comment from an anonymous airline executive to independent scientist Clifford Carnicom, then the most visible scientist collecting data on the aerosol fallout over northern New Mexico. According to this Deep Throat, the purpose of Cloverleaf was to allow commercial airlines to assist in releasing these chemicals into the atmosphere.⁴ Military jets simply could not keep up with the global dimming now called solar radiation management (SRM), so the entire airline industry was being drafted in the name of national security.


    The deeper one probes Project Cloverleaf technology, the more obvious it becomes that cosmic processes are being manipulated and employed. For example, Eastlund’s last patent, published on October 11, 2007, claims that HF ionospheric heaters can create artificial plasma⁵ regions in the atmosphere by means of cosmic particle ignition—sort of like hot spots—utilizing ionization trails of cosmic rays and micro-meteors, thus lowering the power requirements for telecommunications, weather control, lightning protection, and defense applications.⁶ Dam up one of the five atmospheric rivers of vapor in each hemisphere—rivers 420–480 miles wide, two miles above the Earth—and move 340 pounds of water per second toward the poles. Convert the flow to electricity and steer the jet stream to dump masses of rain on a pre-designated geographic area, such as Storm Frank in England in December 2015.⁷

    Even the Sun can be influenced:

    . . .the HF modulation transmitted by HAARP in the ionosphere causes an Alfvén (whistler) wave generation, which in turn creates an ELF harmonic in the Earth’s atmosphere. This Alfvén wave generation can also induce solar activity due to the quantum vibration (sympathetic resonance) between the two bodies. This is exactly what Tesla was referring to when he stated, man could tap the Breast of Mother Sun and release her energy toward Earth as needed—magnetic as well as light." We’re seeing the future.

    But then, there may be blowback chalked up to climate change:

    It’s as if global warming were ringing the Earth’s atmosphere like some great, cacophonous alarm bell. The upper level zonal winds are swinging wildly from record high positive anomalies to record low negative anomalies. . .And the Jet Stream now has redefined all boundaries—flowing at times from the East Siberian Sea in the Arctic across the Equator and all the way south to West Antarctica.

    Today, we can count more than 260 SDI-inspired installations around the world, all engaged, to one degree or another, in ULF/ELF modulation and manipulation of the ionospheric fluctuation known as the auroral jet (electrojet), where the Van Allen Radiation Belts—the shell of our magnetosphere—intersect our atmosphere. Even before Project Cloverleaf was activated and HAARP built, a network of ionospheric heaters already existed.

    The first ionospheric heaters like the Arecibo Radio Telescope (The Pit) in Puerto Rico (1963), the Platteville Atmospheric Observatory in Platteville, Colorado, and EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association) in Tromsø, Norway (1981) initially concentrated on interfering high-frequency radio waves for earth-penetrating tomography. The Pit is still the largest dish antenna in the world with three radar transmitters with an ERP of 20 TW¹⁰ at 2380MHz, 2.5 TW (pulse peak) at 430MHz, and 300MW at 47MHz.

    Just before HAARP was shut down in summer 2013, the Pit ionospheric heater was upgraded:

    It is basically the same as HAARP for the science, except that HAARP was in the Auroral Region, where the physics of the ionosphere is quite different with all the energetic particles and magnetic fields, Penn State Electrical Engineering Professor Jim Breakall, WA3FET, told ARRL. . .The National Science Foundation and Cornell University, which previously operated Arecibo Observatory, contracted with Penn State’s Electrical Engineering Department to construct the new and enhanced HF ionospheric instrument. It will be used to study the interaction between HF radio energy and ionospheric plasma.¹¹

    The Platteville Observatory supposedly shut down in 1984 and is now being used for wind profiling. EISCAT oversees three incoherent scatter radar systems at 224MHz and 931MHz in Northern Scandinavia, and one at 500MHz at EISCAT Space Centre in Svalbard. Additional receiver stations are located in Sodankylä, Finland and Kiruna, Sweden, transmitting 10MW with an antenna gain of 35 decibels (dB) producing an ERP of 32 billion watts. EISCAT is funded and operated by research institutes and councils of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Japan, China, the UK, France, and Germany,¹² and has recently been recalibrated to serve lower-earth orbit (LEO) Space Fence surveillance.

    As for how ionospheric heaters work, picture focused radio waves generated by phased-array radar units striking a targeted area in the ionosphere to ionize (heat) electrons. HAARP’s ionospheric research instrument (IRI) was constructed with 180 antenna towers in a grid of fifteen columns and twelve rows, with two dipole antennas atop each tower. Beneath the array are transmitter shelters, each housing twelve diesel-powered transmitters capable of generating 10,000 watts of RF power each with an ability to focus 3.6 billion watts on a single point. Steering this focus and its pulse transmission agility constitutes the secret power of HAARP, according to Eastlund.

    Once the electrons in the ionosphere are ionized, they twirl down the magnetic lines of force conjoining with Birkeland currents, ready to be steered by various radar instruments for a variety of military-industrial-intelligence C4 operations (command, control, communications, and cyberwarfare), including moving and enhancing weather systems, stimulating seismic plates to generate earthquakes, tomographic penetration of regions of the Earth for mineral or oil exploitation, discovery of underground installations, etc.

    The process is not unlike sonar’s ability to produce a radar-like echo. Tune the ground mechanism—the phased-array antennas laid out in a hexagonal grid following large copper cables buried underground—to produce a standing sky wave that will echo back as a ground wave to be steered and relayed for military operations. HAARP’s IRI was thus able to create a virtual antenna in the sky called an Ionospheric Alfvén Resonator (IAR). Properly activated, Alfvén waves (whistlers)¹³ and magnetosonic (MS) waves in the magnetosphere create a standing wave between the ionosphere and our troposphere that radiates extremely low frequency (ELF) signals around the globe—signals that can be heard in the deepest depths of the oceans.¹⁴ This resonance of standing oscillations behave as strings with the ends fixed in the ionosphere.¹⁵ (Thus, the acronym HAARP.) By constantly priming our atmosphere with conductive metal particulates, a virtual antenna for C4 military operations is thus maintained.

    Compare a Space Fence around the Earth with NASA’s plan to build a de facto magnetosphere around Mars to protect it from solar wind and debris until a new atmosphere forms.¹⁶ Referencing a 2002 paper,¹⁷ Chris Fontenot says NASA’s plan for Mars is entirely possible, thanks to Alfvén waves:

    This technology involves Alfvén wave modulation via HF perturbation by ionospheric heaters located around our planet. The notion of increasing the magnetic field of Mars through a similar process isn’t far-fetched in the least. These Alfvén waves are responsible for Earth’s magnetic field strength: a naturally occurring process normally fueled by solar activity.

    HAARP created the consummate standing sky wave. In HAARP’s backyard, Nick Begich and Jeane Manning explained it twenty years ago in Angels Don’t Play This HAARP:

    This invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art. . .[T]he goal is to learn how to manipulate the ionosphere on a more grand scale than the Soviet Union could do with its similar facilities. HAARP [is] the largest ionospheric heater in the world, located at a latitude most conducive to putting Eastlund’s invention into practice.¹⁸ [Emphasis added.]

    In fact, HAARP’s effective radiative power (ERP) is so great that when its beam intersects with just one other ionospheric heater beam in the Schumann resonance range of 7–8Hz, the entire ionosphere rings.

    Between HAARP’s closure in 2013 and reopening in 2015,¹⁹ its IRI phased array was re-calibrated to synchronize with the vast ground-based network being tuned to resonate with the Space Fence infrastructure, from ionospheric heaters (including many now mobile²⁰) to ELF receivers, digital HF ionosondes, magnetometers, photometers, VLF sounders and VHF riometers, HF receivers, HF/VHF radars, optical imagers, rockets with particle beams and accelerators aboard (e.g., EXCEDE and CHARGE IV), and shuttle- or satellite-borne RF transmitters (e.g., WISP and ACTIVE), and sounding rockets probing heated regions of the ionosphere and dropping chemical releases for space-based efforts.²¹

    The June 6, 1995 HAARP Research and Applications Executive Summary²² put out by the Technical Information Division of the Naval Research Laboratory makes it clear that HAARP was always about the military commitment to controlling the ionosphere so as to generate plasma lenses²³ capable of focusing large amounts of HF energy at high altitude, triggering ionospheric processes in the lower atmosphere, etc. Drawing powering ions from the upper into the lower atmosphere was exactly what the 1980s SDI program lacked.

    The heart of the program will be the development of a unique ionospheric heating capability to conduct the pioneering experiments required to adequately assess the potential for exploiting ionospheric enhancement technology for DOD (Dept. of Defense) purposes. . .[S]uch a research facility will provide the means for investigating the creation, maintenance, and control of a large number and wide variety of ionospheric processes that, if exploited, could provide significant operational capabilities and advantages over conventional C3 systems.

    . . .By exploring the properties of the auroral ionosphere as an active, non-linear medium, the primary energy of the HF transmitter which is confined to a frequency range of 2.8 to 10 MHz can be down-converted to infra-red and visible photons. As a result, the HAARP HF transmitter can generate sources for remote sensing and communications spanning sixteen decades²⁴ in frequency.²⁵ [Emphasis added.]

    Sixteen orders of magnitude point to HAARP’s unique power for manifold operations. As Jerry Smith (1950–2010) commented in HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon:

    This shows the deliberate misdirection of the current HAARP literature, which does all it can to downplay the true power of this transmitter in terms of what it can affect. By being able to rebroadcast anywhere in the non-ionizing (non-radioactive) segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, with a potential re-radiated broadcast power equal to, if not greater than, all the TV and radio stations of the world combined, the HAARP array is utterly in a class of its own. Frankly, its potential exceeds the imaginations of many science fiction writers working today.²⁶

    In summary, with 1.7 gigawatts (billions) ERP and a frequency range of 1–15MHz (millions), HAARP was able to turn the electrojet²⁷ into a virtual antenna with radio wave mirrors (ionospheric lenses) for long-range, over-the-horizon HF/VHF/UHF operations. With the lower atmosphere ionized, all the military had to do was tune the HAARP instrument with one or two other radar beams at other longitudes / latitudes, lay chaff loaded with conductive metal nanoparticulates, and whip up a hurricane, earthquake, drought, or flood—or even a directed energy event like 9/11.

    In Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth, I discuss a few such acts of God. Over the past two decades, hundreds of experiments have been conducted under cover of global warming and climate change. For example, Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012, a real Halloween superstorm that inflicted $71 billion in damage on the Ports of New York and New Jersey and killed 159 people. Sandy’s size and path were unusual:

    After moving north from the tropical waters where it spawned, Sandy turned out to sea before hooking back west, growing in size and crashing head-on into the East Coast, gaining strength when it merged with an eastbound mid-latitude storm. . .These events are somewhat rare in occurrence, but they do exist in nature, [William Lau, research scientist at University of Maryland’s Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center and senior scientist emeritus at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center] said. While they’re turning about each other, they interact. One just took the energy from the other.²⁸

    Sandy’s turn out to sea was to pick up more power from a storm system created in the South Atlantic and pinned offshore for the occasion. Sandy provided the model for dozens of generously funded simulations at NASA Goddard to study what thus far had been learned from Project Stormfury—for example, how warmer ocean-generated storms are 50–160 percent more destructive than Sandy.²⁹

    Sometimes, signs of EM pulsing of frequencies can also be observed, as in this September 21, 2017 South Sandwich Islands, Antarctica photograph by V. Susan Ferguson metaphysicalmusing.com/.

    Three years to the month after Sandy was built off the Atlantic coast, Hurricane Patricia was built off the Pacific coast; in February 2016 Cyclone Winston devastated Fiji as the most potent cyclone on record in the southwest Pacific; in April 2016 Cyclone Fantala was the strongest known storm in the Indian Ocean.

    NBC News hailed Patricia as the strongest storm ever measured. Mexico was warned of possible thirty-nine-foot waves, flash floods, and mudslides, and 15,000 tourists were evacuated from Puerto Vallarta to Jalisco state before the storm made landfall. On Friday, October 23, Patricia’s cyclonic winds were at a frenzied pitch. The sea surged, the rain poured. Four hours after landfall and still moving east, Patricia dropped from a Category 5 to a Category 1, with much of the moisture that would have fed Patricia electromagnetically sent north and east up to Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. Oregonian Ann Fillmore, Ph.D., described it this way while viewing a satellite map:

    . . .first the storm system that appeared on radar to be coming over OR/WA was shown to have more umph and wet stuff in it than the hurricane heading into Mexico. It has literally exploded with rain over NE Washington and Idaho, or so radar says. Now watch what should have been an instant pop-up hurricane off the Mexican coast. Yes! It is there, and then it is not there. Even the rain in it is gone. The rain that is now heading into TX is really not an extension of the so-called hurricane. It is simply another pop-up storm generated over the desert of Mexico. There are other small ‘hurricane-like’ entities over the Pacific, but they seem to be stuck in one spot. I’m surprised the guys who made all of this bizarre stuff didn’t sign their names to it. Superbly done, guys! Wow!³⁰

    Texas and Louisiana prepared for Patricia to be amped up by El Niño, the jetstream lobe, and warm moisture from the Gulf of Mexico. But when Patricia moved past Guadalajara, she just—died. Was Patricia about powering a hurricane up in the presence of El Niño, then stopping it dead in its tracks?


    I draw your attention to the little known fact that particulate plumes can also increase the regional surface temperature at great distances from the plume, which is a totally counterintuitive result in that particulates reduce the level of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface and would be expected to have a cooling effect. The CCS Program however states that by the year 2100 short-lived gases and particles may account for as much as 40 percent of the warming over the summertime continental United States.

    — Geophysicist Keith Potts, COP21

    Like a vast, random experiment targeting the environment with health doomed to be collateral damage, chemicals have been released into the air, soil, and water since nineteenth-century industrialism. While some may shrug that the aerial release of chemical nanoparticles and nano-sensors, microprocessors, and biologicals under the classified Project Cloverleaf is just more of the same, nanoparticles able to breach the blood-brain barrier make it uniquely diabolical, as does the global conspiracy of power to turn the entire planet into an electromagnetic grid and plug everyone into it. War has gone corporate and all of life reframed as a battlespace of disposable noncombatants (civilians) redefined as potential terrorists. The military is no longer a protector but partnered with giant transnational corporations and wealthy dynastic cartels like that of Big Pharma and Big Oil.

    Fertilizers and pesticides, bombs, medicine, and jet fuel additives all flow from the self-serving chemical industry of Dow, Monsanto, Siemens, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, Bayer, I.G. Farben, etc. During World War II, I.G. Farben provided nickel, aluminum, and magnesium for Nazi Heinkel and Junkers Stuka bombers, along with fuel, oil, and phosphorous incendiaries.³¹ Today, they support chemical warfare against society. Monsanto developed its aluminum-resistant Terminator seed in step with the Welsbach patent and Cloverleaf jets furrowing the sky and sowing Al2O3 combustion chemicals in soil, oceans, rivers, water reservoirs, gills and lungs. Big Pharma corporations boost cancer, legislate for more vaccinations, and pay off physicians to ply Americans with one drug after another. Like Monsanto seed, fertilizers, and pesticides, mood stabilizers and vaccines are designed to work synergistically with the chemicals and nanoparticulates falling from the sky. Profit and population control go hand in

    Вы достигли конца предварительного просмотра. Зарегистрируйтесь, чтобы узнать больше!
    Страница 1 из 1


    Что люди думают о Under an Ionized Sky

    1 оценки / 0 Обзоры
    Ваше мнение?
    Рейтинг: 0 из 5 звезд

    Отзывы читателей