DEFINATION AND EXPRESSIONS OF MEANINGS\SENSES OF TERMS.

THERE ARE A NUMBER OF TERMS WHICH EITHER REQUIRE DEFINATIONS OR EXPRESSIONS SO THAT ONE MAY UNDER STAND THERE MEANINGS. OFTEN THERE PROPER DEFINATIONS ARE NOT POSSIBLE OR ARE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. SO THEIR MEANINGS ARE TIRED TO BE EXPRESSED. BUT SOMETIME THEY HAVE MORE THAN ONE MEANING. SO A LOT DEPEND UPON THE CHOICE OF DEFINATION OR MEANING. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DEFINATIONS OR MEANINGS OF SOME IMPORTANT TERMS USED IN THE DISCUSSIONS. THEY ARE MADE AFTER A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THESE TERMS AND THEIR USES IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS. ONE MAY DIFFER FROM THEM BUT CAN NOT COMPELL OTHERS TO ACCEPT THE DIFFERENCE WHICH HE \SHE MAY PROPOSE. THE MOST LIKELY MEANING IS WRITTEN BY DARK GREEN COLOUR.

DEFINATIONS OF TERMS USED IN THE DISCUSSIONS. DISCUSSIONS. ESSENCE:-

1] AN ESSENCE IS ONE WHERE BY A THING IS WHAT SO EVER IT IS. 2] AN ESSENCE IS A ( PER SE) SUBSISTENT WHEREBY A THING IS WHAT IT IS , TOWORDS WHICH ALL THE ATTRIBUTE AND QUALITIES OF THE THINGS ARE REFFERED TO AND FROM WHICH ALL THE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES ARE EMANATED (FROM). 3] AN ESSENCE IS A ( PER SE) SUBSISTENT NATURE. 4]AN ESSENCE IS ONE WHEREBY A THING IS ATTRIBUTED BY WHAT IT IS ATTRIBUTED BY.

SUBSTANCE:-

1] A SUBSTENCE IS A KIND OF SUBSISTENT (PER SE) WHICH IS AN ESSENCE OF A SUBSISTENT (PER SE) 2]A SUBSTANCE IS A SPECIAL TYPE OF SUBSISTENT (PER SE) THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF NON ESSENCE SUBSISTENT (PER SE). 4] AN ESSENCE CAN BE [SPOKEN OF] A SUBSISTENT (PER SE) OR NOT SUBSISTENT. A SUBSTANCE IS AN ESSENCE [ SPOKEN] OF A SUBSISTENT (PERSE). 5]A SUBSTANCE OF A THING IS ONE THAT DETERMINES THE ESSENCE OF THE THING. 6]A SUBSTENCE IS A SUBSISTENT (PER SE) WHOSE IDEA DETERMINES (THE IDEA OF) THE ESSENCE OF THE 6]A THING.

NATURE:-

1] A NATURE IS WHERE BY A THING ACTS \DOES\OPERATES\PERFORMS WHAT SO EVER IT ACTS\ OPERATES\PERFORMS\DOES. 2] A COLLECTION OF ALL THOSE (IMMENANT) ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES WHICH DISTINCTS THE THING FROM AN OTHER THING.

HYPOSTASIS:HYPOSTASIS:-

A (PER SE) SUBSISTENT WHICH IS NOT AN ESSENCE IS CALLED A HYPOSTASIS\HYPOSTASE.

HYPOSTATIC PERSON:SUPPOSITUM:-

A HYPOSTASIS\ HYPOSTASES ASCRIBED BY THE ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY OF RATIONALITY. BEING A THING WHICH IS IN THE LINE OF ACTUALIZATION. 1] A SUPPOSITUM IS :a] AN ESSENCE OR b] A SUBSTANCE OR c] A HYPOSTASIS WITH WELL DEFINED ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES. ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES. 2] A SUPPOSITUM IS A (PER SE) SUBSISTENT WITH SOME WELL DEFINED ATTIBUTES. ( WHETHER IT IS A SUBSTANCE OR AN ESSENCE OR AHYPOSTASIS)

FORM:-

1]A FORM IS ONE THAT IS EITHER AN ESSENCE OR A NATURE. NATURE. 2] A FORM IS EITHER A ( PER SE ) SUBSISTENT NATURE OR NOT ( PER SE) SUBSISTENT NATURE.

BEING:-

A BEING IS A THING IN THE LINE OF ACTUALIZATION.

ATTRIBUTE \ QUALITY:GODHEAD:-

THAT OF A THING THAT IS NOT AN SUBSISTENT ESSENCE. GODHEAD IN TRINITICAL DOGMAS IS A WORD FOR THE PER SE SUBSITENT ESSENCE\OUSIA OF GOD\DEITY. SOME TIME THE WORD DIVINITY IS ALSO USED IN THIS MEANING.

GODHOOD:-

GODHOOD IS THE STATE (GRAMMATICAL) OF BEING GOD\ DEITY. THE WORDS LIKE GODSHIP, ISUSED IN THIS SENSE\MEANING. THE WORD DITINESS MAY BE USED TO CONVEY THIS SENSE\MEANING MORE ACCURATELY. SOME TIME THE WORD DIVINITY IS ALSO USED IN THIS SENSE MEANING.

NOTE:- SOME TIME THE WORD GODHEAD IS IS USED IN THE MEANING OF GODHIOOD, AND SOME TIMES THE WORD GODHOOD IS USED IN THE MEANING OF GODHEAD. BUT PRACTICE OF THESE IRREGULAR USES ARE NOT RECOMMENDED AT ALL.

IN:-

THE WORD IN IS A PREPOSITION/POST-POSITION AND IS USED IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS. IN REGARD TI TRINITY/TRI-UNITY IT IS OFTEN SAID. 1] THREE HYPOSTASES ARE IN A SINGLE ESSENCE. 2] A SINGLE ESSENCE IS IN THREE HYPOSTASIS. BOTH OF THE SENTENCES HAVE DIFFERENT MEANINGS\SENSES YET IT MAY BE THE CASE THAT BOTH SENSES\MEANINGS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE TRUE IN THE SUPPOSED DOGMA. IT IS USED IN THE MEANING\SENSE OF INTERIOR,INTRINSIC,INCLUSION,ETC.

ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY:IMPOSSIBILITY:-

ANY THING WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE, NOT AT ALL ,LIKE CONTRADICTIONS. A CONTRADICTION IS NOT POSSIBLE TO OCCUR. THEOLOGICALLY A CRATED ABSOLUTE BEING IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. IT TRINITICAL DOGMAS GOD CAN NOT INCARNATE OR MENIFEST IN LOWER ANIMAL BEINGS SAY A LION OR A TORTOISE OR A FISH. BUT IN HINDUNISM GOD CAN. THE WORD CAN NOT IS USED IN THE SENSE\MEANING OF ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBLE. CAN IS USED IN THE SENSE\MEANING OF NOT ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBLE.

RELATIVE IMPOSSIBILITY:ABSOLUTE NECESSARY.

ANY THING WHICH IS POSSIBLE BUT DUE TO CERTAIN REASONS IT NEVER OCCURS. IN THE DOGMA OF TRINITY THE INCARNATION OF THE FIRST HYPOSTASIS OR THE LAST HYPOSTASIS IS A RELATIVE IMPOSSIBLE. ONE WHOSE NOT EXISTENCE\OCCURANCE IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. EXAMPLE DIVI PER SE SUBSISTENT AND PER SE PERSISTENT ESSENCE.

RELATIVE NECESSARY:-

A POSSIBLE WHICH MUST OCCUR. IN TRINITICAL DOGMA THE SUPPOSED HYPOSTATIC UNION AND INCARNATION ARE RELATIVE NECESSARY.

COMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY:-

THESES ARE THOSES ATTRIBUTES OF GOD\DEITY WHOSE LOWER/IMPERFECT TYPES ARE FOUND IN SOME SOME CREATED BEINGS. THEIR PERFECT TYPES ARE ONLY FOUND INGOD\DEITY. THEIR IMPERFECT KINDS ARE ONLY FOUND IN CREATED BEINGS.

INCOMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES OF GOD \DEITY:-

THESE ARE THOSE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY WHICH ARE NOT FOUND IN CREATED BEINGS,NOT AT ALL.

INCOMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES OF CREATED BEINGS:-

THESE ARE THOSE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF CREATED BEINGS WHICH ARE NOT FOUND IN GOD DEITY NOT AT ALL.

COMMUNICABLE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF CREATED\MADE BEINGS:THESES ARE THOSES ATTRIBUTES OF CREATED BEINGS WHOSE HIGHER/PERFECT TYPES ARE FOUND IN GOD\ DEITY. THEIR PERFECT TYPES ARE ONLY FOUND INGOD\DEITY.THEIR IMPERFECT KINDS ARE ONLY FOUND IN CREATED BEINGS.

ABSOLUTE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY:_

ABSOLUTE ATTRIBUTES|QUALITIES OF GOD|DEITY ARE THOSE ATTRIBUTES|QUALITIES OF GOD :1] WHICH CANNOT HAVE ANY GRAMMATICAL\MORPHOLOGICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE. I.E IT IS ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBLE. EG. SELF EXISTENCE. 2] WHOSE PASSIVE PARTICIPLE IS THE ACTIVE PARTICIPLE AND IT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE A PASSIVE PARTICIPLE WHICH IS NOT THE ACTIVE PARTICIPLE. EXAMPLE THE SEEING OF THE SELF OF THE PER SE SUBSISTENT ESSENCE BY THE PER SE SUBSISTENT ESSENCE IT SELF. IN THIS CASE THE GRAMMATICAL ACTIVE PARTICIPLE IS THE GRAMMATICAL PASSIVE PARTICLE, AND THE GRAMMATICAL\MORPHOLOGICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE IS THE GRAMMATICAL\MORPHOLOGICALM PASSIVE PARTICIPLE. IT MAY BE SAID THAT THE ACT\DOING OF SEEING ITSELF IS THE VERY SELF OF THE ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY. SO IT IS IN REAL AN ATTRIBUTE\A QUALITY AND IN VERTUAL AN ACT\DOING., ETERNAL AND EMMENANT. ALL ABSOLUTEATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY ARE ETERNAL AND IMMENANT EMANATES FROM THE DIVINE PER SE SUBSITENT ESSENCE\OUSIA AND ARE NECESSARILY REFFERED TO THE PER SE SUBSITENT ESSENCE OF GOD\DEITY.

RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY.

THESE ARE THOSE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY WHOSE GRAMMATICAL\MORPHOLOGICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE WHICH IS NOT THE GRAMMATICAL \MORPHOLOGICAL ACTIVE PARTICIPLE IS NOT ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE.

THEY ARE DIVIDED INTO TWO TYPES\KINDS:-

1] THE GENERAL TYPE\KIND OF RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD.

THEY CAN NOT EXIST WITH OUT THE EXISTENCE OF THEIR GRAMMATICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY EXIST WITH OUT THE EXISTENCES OF THEIRGRAMMATICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLES, WHICH ARE CREATED BEINGS. THIS TYPE OF DIVINE RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES ARE NEITHER ETERNAL NOR IMMENANT.EG. MERCY,JUSTICE, FORGIVENESS.

2] THE SPECIAL TYPES\KINDS OF DIVINE RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES.

THERE ARE SEVERAL TYPES\KINDS OF THEMHOW EVER THERE ARE FEW KNOWN ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES IN EACH TYPE\KIND. THESE TYPES\KINDS DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER ON SEVERAL CHARACTERSTICS . YET THEY HAVE ONE THING NEGATIVLELY COMMON IN THEM. THAT IS THEY CAN EXIST WITH OUT THE EXISTENCE OF GRAMMATICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE WHICH IS NOT THE GRAMMATICAL ACTIVE PARTICIPLE. THAT IS IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT THEY EXIST WITH OUT THE EXISTENCE OF A GRAMMATICAL PASSIVE PARTICIPLE WHICH IS NOT THE GRAMMATICAL ACTIVE PARTICIPLE. THEIR CONNECTIONS WITH NON ETERNAL EXISTING THINGS IS POSSIBLE. THEY ARE ETERNAL AND IMMENANT EMANATES FROM THE DIVINE PER SE SUBSITENT ESSENCE\OUSIA AND ARE NECESSARILY REFFERED TO THE PER SE SUBSITENT ESSENCE OF GOD\DEITY.

IMMENANT THINGS:-

IF A THING CAN NOT EXIST WITH OUT THE EXISTENCE OF ANOTHER THING THEN THE LATTER THING IS AN IMMENANT THING OF THE FORMER THING. THE WORD CAN NOT IS A GENERAL WORD AND INCLUDES BOTH THE SENSES\MEANINGS OF ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBLITY AND RELATIVE IMPOSSIBILITY. IMMENANT ATTRIBUTES\ QUALITIES.:-

NON IMMENENT THINGS.

IF A THING IS NOT AN IMMENANT THING IT IS A NON IMMENANT THING.

IMMENANT ATTRIBUTES \QUALITIES:-

IF AN ESSENCE OF A THING CAN NOT EXIST WITH OUT AN ATTRIBUTE\ A QUALITY THEN THE ATTRIBUTE\ QUALITY IS AN IMMENANT ATTRIBUTE\ QUALITY OF THE THING. 1] IN THE CASE OF GOD\DEITY AN IMMENANT ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY IS ETERNAL. 2] IN A CREATED ESSENCE AN IMMENANT ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY IS FROM THE VERY BEGENING OF THE CREATED ESSENCE AND IF THE ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY CEASES TO BE, IT CEASES TO BE ONLY AND ONLY IF THE ESSENCE CEASES TO BE. 3] RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF GENERAL TIME\KIND ARE NEITHER ETERNAL NOR IMMENANT. 4]RELATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF SPECIAL TYPES\KINDS ARE ETERNAL AND IMMENANT. 5] ABSOLUTE ATTRIBUTES\QUALITIES OF GOD\DEITY ARE ETERNAL AND IMMENANT. 6] AN IMMENANT ATTRIBUTE\ QUALITY ETERNALLY EMANTES FROM THE ETERNAL ESSENCE.

NON IMMENANT QUALITIES\ATTRIBUTE/THING. ASBOLUTE IDENTITY:-

IF AN ATTRIBUTE\QUALITY/THING OF AN ESSENCE IS NOT IMMENANT THE IT IS AN IMMENANT ATTRIBUTE\ QUALITY/THING.. IF A AND B ARE ANY TWO THINGS SUCH THAT A IS B AND B IS A EITHER REGARDLESS OF ANY THING WITH OUT EXCEPTION OR IN REGARD TO EVERY THING WITH OUT EXCEPTION THEN A IS ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TO B. LAW:- IF A IS ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TO B THEN B IS ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TO A.

SEPARATE:-

IF ESSENCE OF A THING SAY A IS DISTINGUISHED FROM THE ESSENCE OF ANOTHER THING SAY B THEN THE THING A IS SEPARATE FROM THE THING B

RELATIVE IDENTITY:DISTINCT:-

IF A IS NOT B AND B IS NOT A BUT THERE IS A THING C WHICH IS NOT SEPARATE FROM BOTH A AND B, AND A IS PRIOR TO B THEN B IS RELATIVELY IDENTICAL TO A (IN REGARD TO C) . C) IF A IS DISTINGUISHED FROM B AND B IS DISTINGUISED FROM A BUT BOTH HAVE A COMMOM ESSENCE THEN BOTH A AND B ARE MUTUALLY DISTINCT FROM EACH OTHER.

COMMUNICABLE:-

IF A IS RELATIVELY IDENTICAL TO B ( IN A REGARD) THEN B IS COMMUNICABLE TO A. EG. A HYPOSTSIS IS RELATIVELY IDENTICAL TO PER SE SUBSISTENT ESSENCE\OUSIA (IN A REGARD) THEN THE PER SE SUBSISTENT ESSENCE OUSIA IS COMMUNICABLE TO THE HYPOSTASIS. INCOMMUNICABLE:IF A IS:a) NOT ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TO B

b) c)

NOT RELATIVLELY IDENTICAL TO B

NOT SEPARATE FROM B THEN A IS INCOMMUNICABLE TO B. LAWS:1] IF A IS DISTICT FROM B THEN A IS INCOMMUNICABLE TO B. 2] IF B IS INCOMMUNICABLE TO A THEN B IS DISTINCT FROM A. IT HAS BEEN TRIED TO DEFINE IR TO EXPRESS THE MEANING AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE., YET THERE IS ALWAYS A ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THESE TYPES OF TERMS BOTH IN DEFINATIONS AND IN EXPRESSIONS OF MEANINGS\SENSES. BUT A MEANING WHICH CAN WORK IN MOST OF THE CASES IS LIKELY TO BE CORRECT. IT IS MOST HUMBLY REQUESTED TO GIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE DEFINATIONS OR EXPRESSIONS OF MEANINGS \ SENSES GIVEN ABOVE. NOTES:1] DEFINATIONS/EXPRESSIONS OF MEANINGS\SENSES ARE CORRECT ACCORDING TO ONE WHO WRITETH BUT IF THE PARENTHESES ARE DROPPED IT IS HOPED THAT THE ACCURACY IS NOT LOST. BUT IT MAY BE LOST. SO GREAT CARE MAY BE DONE IN THIS REGARD. 2] THE MARK \ IS USED FOR ALTERNATIVES. THE MARK / IS NOT USED FOR ALTERNATIVES YET THE MAY BE USED FOR ONE AN OTHER BUT THEY ARE NOT ALTERNATIVE AS ACCORDING TO ONE WHO WRITETH.