Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
qB Ip Eu
Rough Surface L2
For Saturated Soil With =0.50
L0
0.8 Ip
Strip Loading(^)
0.75 AT H/B =
0.6
0.4
Circular Loading(^^)
0.2
(^) From Poulos and Davis (1974), Figure 5.2 (^^) From Poulos and Davis (1974), Figure 5.32
2000
No. 1 1
Decription Portsmouth Sensitive CL Clay S1 > 10, LL = 35, I = 15 p Boston CL Clay LL = 41, Ip = 22 Bangkok CH Clay LL = 65, Ip = 41 Mane Organic CH - CH Clay LL = 65, Ip = 38 AGS CH Clay LL = 71, Ip = 40 Atchafalaya CH Clay LL = 95, Ip = 75 Taylor River Peat W = 500 % N From Ladd & Edgers (1972) MIT for Dames & Moore MIT for Haley & Aldrich
Cu/` vc 0.20
2 3
0.20 0.27
2 3 4
0.285
200
0.255
100 80 60 40
6
5 6
0.24
0.46
20
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Applied Shear Stress Ratio h/cu (1/Factor of Safety) Eu = 3 / h Cu = ( )max h = Applied Horizontal Shear Stress h = Shear Strain
(a) Normalized Secant Modulus vs. Stress Level for Normally Consolidated Soils
1000 2 800 3 600 4 300 400 500
At
h/cu = 1/3
At
h/cu = 2/3
Eu Cu
5 400 6 200
Eu Cu
3 4 200 5 6
100
10
10
OCR = ` /` vm vc
OCR = ` /` vm vc
1.0 0.8
SR = Re/Rl
.5 f= .75
.25
H/B = 0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.0 0.8
SR = Re/Rl
.5 f= .75
.25
H/B = 1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 .5 .75 .25
-.25
SR = Re/Rl
f=
H/B = 1.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Relationship between settlement ratio and applied stress ratio for strip foundation on homogenous isotropic elastic layer.
Soil
Ip(%) 21 24 30 (bulk) 38 40 41
(^) 1963
Source MIT Skempton & Sowa(^) MIT MIT Dames & Moore(^^) AIT & MIT
(^^) 1975
0.8
0.6
0.4
Bangkok Clay
(1 - Ko)
2cu /'vo
f=
0.2 High IP 0
Low IP
-0.2 1
Note : All Data for Unloading From ' vm 2 4 OCR = 'vm /' vc Intial Settlement (p 2/2) Note : cu = 0.5(1 - 2)f from CKoU Triaxial or Plane Strain Tests, Ko from Brooker and Ireland (1965) for ME. Organic Clay. 6 8 10