2010

Servus Servorum Dei

2010
Preamble
We have come forth from the Power to Be the Eternal Mystery of its Presence. We are the
beginning and the end; the origin and dissolution; the geometry of divinity, and we have remained rue to this
eternal Moment in the Sun. We are the silence that is unfathomable, and the s!ar" whose voice is the flame of
#reedom.
We have been called forth to return the Power and we have been chosen, as we have chosen ourselves to Be; to
Become that which we have forever Been. $ur essence is identical to the Source of its essence. #or there was
never a time when we were not, nor shall there ever be a time when we shall cease to Be.

We are they who have nurtured the sacred fire of illumination; forging our Souls into the image of god on Earth.
We are they who have embraced the $rdeal of our descent into matter, and have ascended the %% ste!s of the
s!inal staircase to e&!erience the 'a!ture of the (uic"ening. We are they who have faced the great
magnification of the )ll to ascend the ineffable throne of mind and wield the !ower of self.

$ur Word is ruth and we are its *ssue. $ur Word is +aw and we are Self,governing. $ur Word is +ight and we
Servus Servorum Dei
are the infinite Beacon of Eternal * )m.
We bear the +ight of our ascension and the wisdom of our -ourney into Matter; thus do we re-ect the burdens of
tyranny by e&!osing them as the fruits of ignorance. We have drun" dee!ly from the )ncient #ont, we "now
who we are, and this "nowledge is our !ur!ose. $ur Sword is #laming and two,edged, and its name is
)wa"ening.
he Mind of .reation is manifest in our Eye, and *ts Will in our deeds. We are the 'oyal Seed of the Source
!recisely because we are its Pure +ight Shining rue u!on this Earth. $ur s!irits have been forged in this
crucible of sorrow, therefore our -oy is boundless; and thus are we recogni/ed by those who have eyes to see.
*n this eternal moment, and through this reaty, we do decree * )M; *ndividual and sovereign Beings, in
continual .ommunion with the (uintessence of .reation. We do hereby claim the right to listen to the voice of
god within and to freely choose those with whom we will engage in contract. So here now do we claim our
inheritance, Spiritual sovereignty.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for !eo!le to
dissolve the !olitical bonds which have connected them with others, and to assume among the !owers of the
earth, the se!arate and e0ual station to which they may choose to as!ire, a decent res!ect to the o!inions of
man"ind re0uires that they should declare the causes which im!el them to the se!aration. We hold that no truths
are self,evident, but must have their usefulness demonstrated. hat all !eo!le are created with e0ual freedom
from tyranny, but fre0uently acce!t domination or obedience to a legal code, to a greater or lesser degree from
!erson to !erson. hat !eo!le are endowed with only what rights they have chosen to be endowed with, through
wisdom or common folly, for wealth or ilth. hat !eo!le can secure for themselves, with understanding of their
own uni0ue situations, those rights which best allow them to live in !eace and fruitful harmony with nature and
all 1er various s!ecies. hat whenever any !erson, 2overnment, or other entity, not fully recogni/ing the uni0ue
situation of each individual, becomes in any way o!!ressive or destructive, !eo!le may choose to ignore, alter,
abolish or se!arate themselves from such an institution, and to live in !eace and harmony. hat man can choose
to resolve any conflict through intelligence, with, ade0uate communication and a full understanding of each and
every !oint of view involved, by each and every !erson involved. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that
2overnments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes, but only after calm
consideration of the rue Will and mutual goals of all those individuals involved. )ll e&!erience has shown that
!eo!le are more dis!osed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to
which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usur!ation evinces a design to reduce them
under absolute Des!otism or Dogma not chosen by the individual concerned, it is their right, it is their duty to
themselves and their .reator, to throw off such a 2overnment and to acce!t res!onsibility, each for their own
actions and future security.
Declaration of Causes for Separation
$n 3uly 45, 6778 the .ontinental .ongress a!!ointed Ben-amin #ran"lin as the first !ostmaster general of the
organic Post $ffice for the united states, union of several states. *n 6775 the united states of )merica declared its
inde!endence and in May 679: the .onstitution for the united states of )merica was ado!ted.
$n hursday, Se!t. 67, 679: we find written, ;Mr. 2oodhue, for the committee a!!ointed for the
!ur!ose, !resented a bill to amend !art of the onnage act, which was read the first time. he bill sent from the
Senate, for the temporary establishment of the Post Office, was read the second and third time, and !assed.
he bill for establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for establishing the seat of government . . .< he organic
Servus Servorum Dei
!ost office for the united states of )merica established the seat of government, a general !ost office, under the
direction of the !ostmaster general.
his is verified on March 6948, when an act was !assed entitled =)n act to reduce into one the several acts
establishing and regulating the !ost office de!artment,= % Story, >. S. 6948. ;It is thereby enacted !hat there
be established" the seat of the government of the #nited States" a general post office" under the direction of
a postmaster general.<
he organic !ost office for the united states of )merica established the ten miles s0uare, styled as
WASHINGTON, D.C., as a general !ost office and inde!endent !ostal /one with the rights and authority of a
sovereign nation, o!erating under a cor!orate structure under the direction of the !ostmaster general to function
as the seat of government of the >nited States.
) visit to the >SPS web site today will establish that 3ohn ?3ac"@ E. Potter wears two hats and is 6@ the
!ostmaster general Aof the organic !ost officeB and 4@ the .E$ of the >SPS Acor!orateB. he web site offers
further evidence of the e&istence of two se!arate !ost office entities when they state that the Post $ffice is 6@ one
of the most trusted government agencies, and 4@ one of the ten most trusted organizations in the nation. When
one researches the two words we find that they are not inter,changeable; they do not and cannot define the same
entity.
he constitution of the >nited States has vested congress with the !ower to establish !ost offices and !ost roads
within the ten miles s0uare and within anyCall territories of same. A)rt. 6, s. 9, n. 7B .ongress created the
cor!orate >nited States Post $ffice which today is the >nited States Postal Service or >SPS o!erating via the
authority vested in the general !ost office styled as WASHINGTON, D.C.
$n #ebruary 46, 6976 65 Statutes at +arge D6: divided )merica into 6E districts or territories for the !ur!ose of
e&!anding outside of the ten miles s0uare the authority of said general !ost office over We the )merican Peo!le.
COMPLEX REGUL!OR" SC#EME
he .onstitution for the >nited States granted congress the !ower toF
+ay and collect ta&es, Duties, *m!osts and E&cises, to !ay the debts and !rovide for the common defense
and general welfare of the >nited States. A)rt. * sec. 9, cl. DB;
o regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, A)rt. * sec. 9 cl. %B;
o establish uniform laws on the sub-ect of ban"ru!tcy, A)rt. * sec. 9 cl. DB;
o declare war, grant letters of Mar0ue and 'e!risal, and ma"e rules concerning ca!tures on land and
water, A)rt. * sec. 9 cl. 66B;
o e&ercise e&clusive legislation in all cases, whatsoever, over such district ?not to e$ceed ten miles
s%uare@ as may, by cession of !articular states, and acce!tance by congress, become the seat of
government of the >nited States, and to e&ercise li"e authority over all !laces !urchased by the consent
of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection #orts, Maga/ines, )rsenals,
doc" yards and other needful things.
.ongress has the !ower under )rticle * of the .onstitution to authori/e an administrative agency administering a
com!le& regulatory scheme to allocate costs and benefits among voluntary !artici!ants in the !rogram without
!roviding an )rticle *** ad-udication of claims. A)m. 3ur. 4
nd
#edcourts sec. 7B. .ongress, acting for a valid
legislative !ur!ose, !ursuant to its !owers under )rticle *, may create a ;seemingly !rivate< right that is so
closely integrated into a !ublic regulatory scheme as to be a matter a!!ro!riate for agency resolution with
limited involvement by the )rticle *** -udiciary. )gency resolution of such federal rights may ta"e the form of
binding arbitration with limited -udicial review. A)m. 3ur. 4
nd
#edcourts sec 7B
So, to cement their encroachment of !ower over the )merican !eo!le beyond the ten miles s0uare, congress
created a com!le& regulatory scheme called the federal ?and state@ Statutes, .odes and 'egulations, to allocate
Servus Servorum Dei
costs, for the collection of ta&es, duties and e&cises, for the !ayment of the national debt, and to !rovide for the
common defense and general welfare of the >nited States.
.ongress so closely integrated a seemingly !rivate right ?right to contract@ into this com!le& regulatory scheme
to turn unsus!ecting )merican sovereigns, creators of the >nited States, into seemingly voluntary !artici!ants in
the !rogram; seemingly voluntary !artici!ants in binding contracts, having received limited or no valuable
consideration in the e&change and failing full disclosure of the terms and conditions of said contracts which are
contrary to the best interest of the )merican !eo!le.
he federal courts have become administrative courts em!loying E&ecutive )dministrators charged with the
enforcement of codes and statutes, A#'. v 2E 496 >S D5D, GE++E' v PE 456 >S D49, 6 Stat. 6%9,6799B, to
collect the ta&es, duties, im!osts and e&cises for the !ayment of the national debt in accordance with )rticle * of
the .onstitution. *n 6:75 Public +aw :D,%96 officially brought the federal courts under the e&ecutive branch
o!erating under )rticle * of the .onstitution in violation of the se!aration of !owers.
he >.S. District courts have original -urisdiction over all maritime causes; of all land sei/ures under the
)dmiralty E&tension )ct; of all actions of Pri/e; and of all non,maritime sei/ures under any law of the >nited
States on land or water. A49 >S.) sec. 6%85B he .ommerce .lause, A)rt. * sec. 9, cl. 6%B of the .onstitution is
a sufficient basis for federal admiralty !ower while the )dmiralty E&tension )ct brought the )dmiralty
-urisdiction inland.
he rading With he Enemy )ct made all )mericans enemy combatants and enemies of the >nited States and
!laced all )mericans on the list maintained by the .ustodian of the )lien Pro!erty, ASecretary of the >.S.
reasuryB ma"ing all )mericans sub-ect to the sei/ure of our bodies and our !rivate !ro!erty under the laws of
war or the +aws of Pri/e under .hoses in action for satisfaction of a contractual obligation, e&!ress or im!lied.
When one defaults on his contractual obligations to !ay his share of the national debt, which is based on the +aw
of .ontributions, his !rivate !ro!erty becomes sub-ect to sei/ure, 3uri Belli, out of the hands of the enemy by the
right or laws of Pri/e, by Privateers acting under +etters of Mar0ue and 'e!risal under )rticle *, sec. 9, cl. 66 of
the .onstitution.
.ongress has em!owered members of the !rivate B.).'. )ssociation with a mono!oly in the >.S. courts, as
Privateers acting under +etters of Mar0ue and 'e!risal, ?B.).'. )ssociation .ard Ho. I +etter of Mar0ue
document no.@ to sei/e the !ro!erty and the body of the offender in order to obtain satisfaction for the obligations
for which he has contracted, "nowingly or otherwise.
1owever, there are several things intrinsically flawed, unconscionable andCor fraudulent about this com!le&
regulatory scheme.
We the Peo!le of )merica are Party to an im!ortant e0uity contract with the >nited States; the ;$riginal E0uity
.ontract<, whereby We the Peo!le allow the >nited States the use of our Jgood faith and creditK which is
transmitted to the >.S. via the transmitting utility, !ublic vessel JstrawmanK. Said !ublic vessel, transmitting
utility was created and registered by the state only days after our birth into this world, obviously without our
consent. *n e&change for the use of our credit the >nited States has !romised to !ayCdischarge all of the debt of
the sovereign, via the !ublic vessel, !roviding the dual consideration necessary for a valid contract. *t has been
established as a matter of fact that the >nited States has e&ecuted said e0uity contract with this Petitioner, having
created funds from the credit of Petitioner, thereby charging their debtor obligation for the e&change.
*t has been established in fact that, ;)ll that government does and !rovides legitimately is in !ursuit of its duty
to !rovide !rotection for !rivate rights AWynnhammer v Peo!le, 6% HL %79B which duty is a debt owed to its
creator, We the Peo!le of )merica, and the uninfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never e&tinguished
nor discharged, and is !er!etual. Ho matter what the defacto government !rovides for us in the manner of
convenience and safety, the uninfranchised individual owes nothing to the government. A1ale v 1en"le 4E6 >S
D%B
;We the Peo!le have discharged any debt which is said to e&ist or owed to the state. he governments are,
!resumably, indebted continually to the Peo!le, because the Peo!le, the sovereigns, !resumably accented to the
creation of the government cor!oration and because we suffer its continued e&istence. he continued debt owed
Servus Servorum Dei
to the )merican Peo!le is discharged only as it continues not to violate our !rivate rights, and when government
fails in its duty to !rovide !rotection, discharge its duty to the Peo!le, it is an abandonment ?delictual default@ of
any and all !ower, authority or vestige of sovereignty which it may have otherwise !ossessed, and the law
remains the same, the sovereignty reverting bac" to the Peo!le whence it came.< ADownes v Bidwell 694 >S 4DD
?6:E6@B
*t is an acce!ted ma&im of law that a contract is controlling until su!erseded by a new contract, whereby the new
contract becomes the controlling document. o overcome the >nited StatesK debtor obligations to We the
)merican Peo!le for the use of our good faith and credit in the Joriginal e0uity contractK, .ongress embedded
numerous secret adhesion contracts and assum!tionsC!resum!tions into their com!le& regulatory scheme for
which they hold the Peo!le accountable.
*f a AgovernmentB comes down from their !osition of sovereignty, and enters the domain of commerce, it submits
itself to the same laws that govern individuals there. he >.S. must do business on business terms. $nce the
>nited States waives its immunity and does business with its citi/ens, it does so much as a !arty never cloa"ed
in immunity.
;Parties to a contract have an obligation to o!erate with full disclosure and honesty, acting in good faith and with
clean hands. ;Even in the domain of !rivate contract law, the author of a standard form agreement is re0uired to
state its terms with clarity and candor. Surely, no less is re0uired A%:5 >S 444B of the >nited States when it does
business with its citi/ens.< A>S v Sec"inger %:7 >S 4E%B
*n the com!le& regulatory scheme created by congress, the >.S. secretly !resumes that the living man, )merican
sovereign, to be the legal fiction !ublic vessel, its surety andCor beneficiary. he >.S. !resumes that the
)merican sovereign has assented to !aying the debt of the cor!oration; to being a debtor and insolvent ban"ru!t
having !ledged ourselves as sureties for the debts of the >.S. he >nited States has never informed the
)merican Peo!le of these assum!tionsC !resum!tions which they hold against us nor the conse0uences thereof.
*n the contrary, the >.S. has invested 78 years of !ro!aganda to indoctrinate the )merican Peo!le thatF
he sovereign is the legal fiction transmitting utility;
he S.S. M is mandatory;
) Driver license and Marriage +icense are mandatory for )merican sovereigns;
he filing of an *'S 6EDE form is mandatory for the )merican sovereign;
*t is mandatory for the )merican Peo!le to register our !rivate !ro!erty with the state, effectively and
secretly transferring title to the state;
he .odes and Statutes !ertain to the )merican sovereign;
hese secret adhesion contracts are valid and binding, having failed to inform the )merican sovereign of
the terms and conditions of the secret adhesion contracts attached thereto; having failed at e0ual, dual
consideration;
he .odes and Statutes !ertain to all sovereigns and not -ust to agents and em!loyees of the >.S.
)nd much, much more.
he >.S. has failed at full disclosure; having failed to inform the )merican sovereign of the e&istence of
the original contract which was e&ecuted when we wereCare only days old without full disclosure andCor
our consent, or that these secret contracts effectively void our original contract and have effectively
allowed the >nited States to steal the !ersonal e&em!tions of the )merican !eo!le thereby leaving the
)merican Peo!le and this Petitioner without a remedy.
he >nited States has not only failed at full disclosure but has ta"en overt ste!s to deceive and
misinform the )merican Peo!le. he >.S. has em!loyed the use of threats and intimidation to maintain
the illusion they have invested years creating to side ste! their debtor obligations to the )merican Peo!le
in our original e0uity contracts.
Servus Servorum Dei
he !ostal /one, general !ost office, seat of government of the >nited States, under the direction of the
!ostmaster general, 3ohn ?3ac"@ E. Potter, has become a continuing criminal enter!rise consistently
o!erating contrary to the best interest of the )merican Peo!le, whose !ro!erty has been !laced at ris" to
fund the >.S., and a breach of the original contract?s@ with this Petitioner and each and every one of the
)merican Peo!le.
he establishment of the seat of the government of the >nited States, a general !ost office under the
direction of 3ohn ?3ac"@ E. Potter, by the organic !ost office for the united states of )merica is a breach
of contract for its failure to !rovide a re!ublican form of government for the )merican Peo!le.
he >nited States has been o!erating in receivershi! continuously for decades with numerous re,
organi/ations. he receivershi! has e&ceeded its term life by several years. he time has come to
li0uidate the beast and close the boo"s on the receivershi!. *t is time for the )merican Peo!le to e&ercise
our right of redem!tion of our !rivate !ro!erty that has been !laced at ris" to fund the receivershi!. he
>nited States is restraining the )merican !eo!leKs right of redem!tion of the !ro!erty to e&tend the term
of receivershi! and the criminal activity which has infected the entire /one.
he >nited States has bloc"ed numerous attem!ts by this reaty E&ecutor to redeem the !ro!erty via
discharge of the debt. he >nited States, o!erating under the direction of the Post Master 2eneral has
used threats, intimidation, im!risonment, tric"ery and deceit to steal the )merican !eo!leKs !ersonal
e&em!tion?s@, bloc"ing our right of redem!tion and leaving the )merican !eo!le with no available
remedy.
C&'I( O) '*')+O)(,)!
-or !he Sovereign People of 'merica
*t has been established in fact thatF
6@ *t is the !rivate !ro!erty of the )merican !eo!le that has been !laced at ris" to collaterali/e the
receivershi! of the general !ost office styled as the >H*ED S)ES; and
4@ *t is the credit of the Sovereign !eo!le of )merica that funds the day to day o!erations of same; and
%@ he term life of the receivershi! of the >H*ED S)ES has been e&hausted; and
D@ he )merican !eo!le hold the !riority entitlement right to the !ro!erty; and
8@ he )merican !eo!le hold an absolute !riority right of redemption of the !ro!erty; and
5@ he remedy for the redem!tion has been !rovided; and
7@ he .reditors have overtly im!aired the right of redem!tion of the )merican !eo!le; and
9@ he .reditorNs actions have established the evidence of their o!eration in e0uity in bad faith and unclean
hands and constitutes a delictual default and an abandonment of their claims; and
:@ he administrative agents and agencies of the >H*ED S)ES have not only failed to !rotect the
!rivate rights of the )merican !eo!le, but, have actively !artici!ated in the violation of said !rivate
rights; and
6E@ he acts and actions of the agents andCor em!loyees of the administrative agencies of the >H*ED
S)ES in the violation of the !rivate rights of the )merican !eo!le establishes the evidence of their
o!eration in e0uity in bad faith and with unclean hands and constitutes their voluntary surrender of all
e0uity claims in their name andCor in their control; and
66@ he failure of the >H*ED S)ES to !rotect the !rivate rights of the )merican !eo!le constitutes a
Servus Servorum Dei
delictual default and an abandonment of the !ostal /one styled as the >H*ED S)ES and all
sovereign rights, !ower and authority associated therewith.
.onstitutionally and in the laws of e0uity, the >nited States could not borrow or !ledge the !ro!erty and
wealth of the )merican !eo!le, !ut at ris" as collateral for its currency and credit, without legally !roviding
them e0uitable remedy for recovery of what is due them. he >nited States did not violate the law or the
.onstitution in order to collaterali/e its financial reorgani/ation. But, did in fact !rovide such a legal remedy so
that it has been able to continue on since 6:%% to hy!othecate and re,hy!othecate the !rivate wealth and assets of
the )merican !eo!le, at ris" bac"ing the governmentKs obligations and currency, by their im!lied consent,
through the government having !rovided such remedy, as defined and codified above, for recovery of what is
due them on their assets and wealth at ris". he !rovisions for this are found in the same act of Public Policy,
13' 6:4, !ublic law 7%,6E that sus!ended the gold standard for our currency, abrogated the right to demand
!ayment in gold, and made the #ederal 'eserve notes, for the first time, legal tender Jbac"ed by the substance or
credit of the nation.K )ll >.S. currency since that time is no more than credit against the real !ro!erty and wealth
of the sovereign )merican !eo!le, ta"en andCor !ledged by the >nited States to its secondary creditors as
security for its obligations. .onse0uently, those bac"ing the nationKs credit and currency could not recover what
was due them by anything drawn on the #ederal 'eserve notes without e&!anding their ris" and obligation to
themselves. )ny recovery !ayments bac"ed by this currency would only increase the !ublic debt the )merican
!eo!le are collateral for, which an e0uitable remedy was intended to reduce, and in e0uity would not satisfy
anything.
here are other serious limitations on our !resent system. Since the institution of these events, for
!ractical !ur!oses of commercial e&change, there has been no actual money of substance in circulation by which
debt owed from one !arty to another can actually be re!aid.
he #ederal 'eserve Hotes, although made legal tender for all debts, !ublic and !rivate in the re,
organi/ation, can only discharge debt. Debt must be J!aidK with value or substance ?gold, silver, barter, labor, or
a commodity@. #or this reason 13' 6:4, Public law 7%,6E, which established the !ublic !olicy of our current
monetary system, re!eatedly uses the term of JdischargeK in con-unction with J!aymentK in laying out !ublic
!olicy for the new system. ) debt currency system cannot J!ayK debt. Since 6:%% to !resent, commerce in the
cor!orate >nited States and among sub,cor!orate sub-ect entities has had only debt note instruments by which
debt can be discharged and transferred in different forms. he un!aid debt, created andCor e&!anded by the !lan
now carries a !ublic liability for collection in that when debt is discharged with debt instruments, ?i.e. #ederal
'eserve Hotes, etc.@, by our commerce, debt is inadvertently expanded instead of being aneled, thus increasing
the !ublic debt, a situation fatal to any economy.
.ongress and government officials who orchestrated the !ublic laws and regulations that made the
financial reorgani/ation antici!ated the long term effect of a debt based financial system which many in
government feared, and which we face today in servicing the interest on trillions of dollars in >.S. .or!orate
!ublic debt, and in this same act made !rovisions not only for the recovery remedy to satisfy e0uity to its
Sureties, but to simultaneously resolve this !roblem as well.
Since it is, in fact, the real !ro!erty and wealth of the )merican !eo!le that is the substance bac"ing all
the other obligations, currency and credit of the >nited States and such currencies could not be used to reduce its
obligations for e0uity interest recovery to its Princi!als and Sureties, 13' 6:4, !ublic law 7%,6E further made
the ;notes of national ban"s< and ;national ban"ing associations< on !ar with its other currency and legal tender
obligations.
!I!&, .1/ S#*!I!&, I0/ C1'P!,2 31/ S#*C1'P!,2 I Sec. 310. says4
&egal !ender O >nited States coins and currency ?including #ederal 'eserve Hotes and circulating notes of
#ederal 'eserve Ban"s and national ban"s@ are legal tender for all debts, !ublic charges, ta&es and dues. his
Servus Servorum Dei
legal definition for Jlegal tenderK was first established in 13' 6:4 in the same act that made #ederal 'eserve
Hotes and notes of national ban"ing associations legal tender.
Public Policy 1J2 152
JOI)! 2,SO&#!IO) !O S#SP,)+ !1, 6O&+
S!')+'2+ ')+ '*2O6'!, !1, 6O&+ C&'#S,
J#), 3" 15..
1J2 152 7.
2+
Congress" 1
st
Session
3oint 'esolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currency of the >nited States
)s used in this resolution, the term ;obligation< means an obligation ?including every obligation of and
to the >nited States, e&ce!ting currency@ !ayable in money of the >nited States; and the term Jcoin or currencyK
means coin or currency of the >nited States, including #ederal 'eserve Hotes and circulating notes of #ederal
'eserve Ban"s and national ban"ing associations.
)ll coins and currencies of the >nited States ?including #ederal 'eserve Hotes and circulating notes of
#ederal 'eserve Ban"s and national ban"ing associations@ heretofore and hereafter coined or issued, shall be
legal tender for all debt, !ublic and !rivate, !ublic charges, ta&es, duties and dues.<
)lthough 13' 6:4 has been since re!ealed, >.. 6E,6ED >n,re!eals the resolution as the >nited States
cannot deny or withhold remedy from the )merican !eo!le as long as their economic system remains
collaterali/ed by the wealth and assets of the )merican !eo!le.
!I!&, 12.221 +efinitions 8 ;he terms Jnational ban"K and Jnational ban"ing associationsK P.shall be held to
be synonymous and interchangeable.< he term ;notes of national ban"s or national ban"ing associations< have
been continuously maintained in the official definition of legal tender since 3une 8, 6:%% to !resent, when the
term had never been used to define JcurrencyK or Jlegal tenderK before that time. Prior to 6:%% the forms of
currency in use that were legal tender were many and variedF >nited States 2old .ertificates, >nited States
Hotes, reasury Hotes, *nterest bearing notes, 2old coins of the >nited States, Standard silver dollars, subsidiary
silver coins, minor coins, commemorative coins, but, the list did not include #ederal 'eserve Hotes or notes of
national ban"s or national ban"ing associations des!ite the fact national ban" notes were a common medium of
e&change or JcurrencyK and had been, almost since the founding of our ban"ing system and were bac"ed by
>nited States bonds or other securities on de!osit for the ban" with the >.S. reasury.
#urther, from the time of their inclusion in the definition they have been !hased out until !resently all
!rovisions in the >nited States .ode !ertaining to incorporated federally chartered National Banking
institutions issuing, redeeming, re!lacing and circulating notes have all been re!ealed. )s stated in ;Money and
Ban"ing<, D
th
Ed., by David 1. #riedman, !ublished by the )merican Ban"ers )ssociation, !age 79, ;oday
commercial ban"s no longer issue currencyP.<
*t is clear that the federally incor!orated ban"ing institutions sub-ect to the restrictions and re!ealed sections of
itle 64, are H$ those !rimarily referred to maintained in the current definitions of ;legal tender.<
he legal statutory and !rofessional definitions of Jban"sK, Jban"ingK, and Jban"erK used in the >nited
States .ode of #ederal 'egulations are not those commonly understood for these terms and have made statutory
definition of ;Ban"< accordinglyF
#CC 9:103 Part 1 : *an; ;means a !erson engaged in the business of ban"ing,<
12 C-2 Sec. 225.2 +efinitions <e= *an; means O ;the term ban" also includes any !erson engaged in the
business of ban"ing,<
12 C-2 Sec. 210.2 +efinitions. ?d@ ;Ban" means any !erson engaged in the business of ban"ing.<
!itle 12 #SC Sec. 1>1. ODefinitions of Ban" and 'elated erms., ?6@ Ban", he term ;Ban"< O ?a@ ;means any
national ban", state ban", and district ban", and any federal branch and insured branch;<
Servus Servorum Dei
*lac;?s &a@ +ictionary" 3
th
,dition" page 1.. defines a ;Ban"er< as ; *n general sense, !erson that engages in
the business of ban"ing. *n narrower meaning, a !rivate !ersonP.; who is engaged in the business of ban"ing
without being incor!orated. >nder some statutes, an individual ban"er, as distinguished from a ;!rivate ban"er<,
is a !erson who, having com!lied with the statutory re0uirements, has received authority from the state to
engage in the business of ban"ing, while a J!rivate ban"erK is a !erson engaged in ban"ing without having any
s!ecial !rivileges or authority from the state.<
;*an;ingA *s !artly and o!tionally defined as ;he business of issuing notes for circulationP.., negotiating
bills.<
*lac;?s &a@ +ictionary" 3
th
,dition" page 1.." defines B*an;ing< ;he business of ban"ing, as defined by
law and custom, consists in the issue of notesPPintended to circulate as moneyP..<
)nd defines a ;*an;er?s )ote< as ;) commercial instrument resembling a ban" note in every !articular e&ce!t
that it is given by a J!rivate ban"erK or unincor!orated national ban"ing institution.< #ederal statute does not
s!ecifically define Jnational ban"K and Jnational ban"ing associationK in those sections where these uses are
legislated on to e&clude a !rivate ban"er or unincor!orated ban"ing institution. *t does define these terms to the
e&clusion of such !ersons in the cha!ters and sections where the issue and circulation of notes by national ban"s
has been re!ealed or forbidden.
*n the absence of a statutory definition, the courts give terms their ordinary meaning. Bass, erri +. vs
Stol!er, Gorit/ins"i, 666 #.%
rd
6%48, 7
th
.ir.)!!s. ?6::5@ )s the >.S. Su!reme .ourt noted, ;We have stated time
and again that courts must !resume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what
it says there.< See e.g., >nited States vs 'on Pair Enter!rises, *nc. D9: >.S. 4%8, 4D6,4D4 ?6:9:@ ;he
legislative !ur!ose is e&!ressed by the ordinary meaning in the words used.< 'ichards vs >nited States %5: >.S.
6 ?6:54@
he legal definitions relating to Jlegal tenderK have been written by congress and maintained as such to
be both e&clusive, where necessary, and inclusive, where a!!ro!riate, to !rovide in its statutory definitions of
legal tender for the inclusion of all those, who by definition of !rivate, unincor!orated !ersons engaged in the
business of ban"ing to issue notes against the obligation of the >nited States for recovery on their ris", whose
!rivate assets and !ro!erty are being used to collaterali/e the obligations of the >nited States since 6:%%, as
collectively and nationally constituting a legal class of !ersons being a ;national ban"< or ;national ban"ing
association< with the rights to issue such notes against the obligations of the >nited States for e0uity interest
recovery due and accrued to these Princi!als and Sureties of the >nited States bac"ing the obligations of >.S.
currency and credit; as a means for the legal tender discharge of lawful debts in commerce as remedy due them
in con-unction with >.S. obligations to the discharge of that !ortion of the !ublic debt, which is !rovided for in
the !resent financial reorgani/ation still in effect and ongoing since 6:%%. A64 >S. D66, 69 >S. 9, 64 >S.; ch.
5, %9 Stat. 486 Sect 6D?a@, %6 >S. 8669, %64% with rights !rotected under the 6D
th
)mendment of the >nited
States .onstitution, by the >.S. Su!reme .ourt in >.S. vs 'ussell ?6% Wall, 54%, 547@, Pearlman vs 'eliance *ns.
.o., %76 >.S. 6%4, 6%5, 6%7 ?6:54@, >S vs 1ooe, %.ranch ?>S@ 7% ?69E8@ and in conformity with the >.S.
Su!reme .ourt 7: >S 497 ?697E@, 674 >.S. D9 ?69:9@, and as confirmed at %E7 >.S. 4D7 ?6:%:@B
13' 6:4, !ublic law 7%,6E further declaredP.<every !rovisionP which !ur!orts to give the obligee a right to
re0uire !ayment in gold or a !articular "ind of coin or currencyP.is declared against !ublic !olicy; and no such
!rovision shall bePmade with res!ect to any obligation hereafter incurred.<
Ma"ing way for discharge and recovery on >.S. cor!orate !ublic debt due the Princi!als and Sureties of
the >nited States !roviding as !ublic !olicy for the discharge of Jevery obligationK, including every obligation of
and to the >nited States, Jdollar for dollarK, allowing those bac"ing the >nited States financial reorgani/ation to
recover on it by discharging an obligation they owe to the >nited States or its sub,cor!orate entities, against that
same amount of obligation of the >nited States owed to them; thus !roviding the remedy for the discharge and
orderly recovery of e0uity interest on >.S. cor!orate !ublic debt due the Sureties, Princi!als and 1olders of the
>nited States, discharging that !ortion of the !ublic debt without e&!ansion of credit, debt or obligation on the
>nited States or these its !rime creditors it was intended to satisfy e0uitable remedy to, but gaining for each
Servus Servorum Dei
bearer of such note, discharge of obligation e0uivalent in value Jdollar for dollarK to any and all Jlawful tender of
the >nited States.<
hose who constitute an association nationwide of !rivate, unincor!orated !ersons engaged in the
business of ban"ing to issue notes against these obligations of the >nited States due them; whose !rivate
!ro!erty is at ris" to collaterali/e the governmentKs debt and currency, by legal definition, a Jnational ban"ing
associationK; such notes, issued against these obligations of the >nited States to that !art of the !ublic debt due
its Princi!als and Sureties and re0uired by law to be acce!ted as Jlegal; tenderK of !ayment of all debts, !ublic
and !rivate, and are defined in law as Jobligations of the >nited StatesK, on the same !ar and category with
#ederal 'eserve Hotes and other currency and legal tender obligations.
>nder this remedy for discharge of the !ublic debt and recovery to its Princi!als and Sureties, two debts
that would have been discharged in #ederal 'eserve debt note instruments or chec"s drawn on the same, e0ually
e&!anding the !ublic debt by those transactions, are discharged against a single !ublic debt of the cor!orate
>nited States and its sub,cor!orate entities to its !rime creditor without the e&!ansion and use of #ederal
'eserve debt note instruments as currency and credit, and so, without the e&!ansion of the !ublic debt and debt
instruments in the monetary system and the e&!ansion of the !ublic debt as burden u!on the entire financial
system and its Princi!als and Sureties the recovery remedy was intended to relieve.
heir use is for the discharge and non,cash accrual reduction of >.S. .or!orate !ublic debt to the
Princi!als, Sureties, Prime .reditors and 1olders of it as !rovided in law and the instruments will ultimately be
settled by ad-ustment and set,off in discharge of a bearers obligation to the >nited States against the obligation
of the >nited States for the amount of the instrument to the original creditor it was tendered to or whomever or
whatever institution may be the final bearer and holder in due course of it, again, thus discharging that !ortion of
the !ublic debt without e&!ansion of credit, debt or note on the !rime creditors of the >nited States it was
intended to satisfy e0uitable remedy to, but gaining for each endorsed bearer of it discharge of obligation
e0uivalent in value, Jdollar for dollarK of currency, measurable in Jlawful money of the >nited States.K
Even though the gold clause has been re!ealed, there still remains no currency of value or substance or
gold coin in circulation today with which to !ay a debt. he law does not allow for im!ossibilities. But even this
did not re!eal or remove our remedy which e0uity demands for the Princi!als and Sureties of the >nited States.
he !ractical evidence and fact of the financial reorgani/ation ?ban"ru!tcy@ of the >nited States is still ongoing
today, visible all around us to see and understand. When reasury Hotes come due, they are not !aid. hey are
refinanced by new reasury Bills and Hotes to bac" the currency and cover the debtsP.something that cannot be
done with debt, unless, the debtor is !rotected by ban"ru!tcy reorgani/ation that is regularly restructured to "ee!
it going. Each time the #ederal debt ceiling is raised by .ongress they are restructuring the ban"ru!tcy
reorgani/ation of the governmentKs debt so that commerce may continue on. The recovery remedy is maintained
in law because it has to be to satisfy equity to its prime creditors.
he ban"ru!tcy obstruction and overt im!airment of the absolute !riority right of redem!tion by the
.'ED*$' #ederal 'eserve Ban" and ban"ing families has established in fact the .'ED*$'NS o!eration in
e0uity in bad faith and with unclean hands and constitutes a delictual default and abandonment of all
.'ED*$' claims and the relin0uishment of the P+ED2ED !ro!erty; and
he ban"ru!tcy obstruction and overt im!airment of the absolute !riority right of redem!tion by the
.$>'S has established in fact the general !ost office styled as the >H*ED S)ESN o!eration in e0uity in
bad faith and with unclean hands and constitutes a delictual default and abandonment of all e0uity claims of the
>H*ED S)ES and their voluntary abandonment of all sovereign rights, !ower and authority associated
therewith; and
!he sovereign people of 'merica" through and by James:!homas4 (c*ride" private postmaster"
have served )otice of the 'bandonment and registered the priority claim on the abandonment.
Servus Servorum Dei
!he Claim on 'bandonment by the sovereign people of 'merica has been received and
accepted @ithout obCection or dispute.
+eclaration Of Peace
!he general post office styled as the #)I!,+ S!'!,S has been in a perpetual state of @ar since
its inception. !he DPo@ers !hat *eD have used the #)I!,+ S!'!,S as a @eapon to @age @ar on the
sovereign people of 'merica" operating under the ,mergency Ear Po@ers 'ct and the secret
presumption that the sovereign people are the enemy of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S for the purpose of evading
their liabilities under the original e%uity contract and to pillage and plunder the private property of the
people they @ere created to serve.
!he general post office styled as the #)I!,+ S!'!,S has been used as a @eapon to @age an
economic @ar at arms length against all of the people of the @orld bringing all of humanity to the brin; of
destruction as the C2,+I!O2DS master plan of total economic slavery over the sovereign people of the
@orld has been implemented.
!he Po@ers !hat *e have used the #)I!,+ S!'!,S as a @eapon to @age @ar on the sovereign
people of the @orld via the unconscionable creation" production and distribution of harmful drugs for the
purpose of enslaving the people and funding and e$ecuting their genocide against humanity.
!he Po@ers !hat *e have used the #)I!,+ S!'!,S as a platform for their propaganda" creating
the @orldDs problems and then presenting themselves as the @orldDs savior bringing about the solution and
protection from their self created illusionary boogie men for the purpose of enslaving the sovereign people
of the @orld.
&et it be ;no@n by all of humanity that the4
#)I!,+ S!'!,S has +,C&'2,+ P,'C,.
-rom this day for@ard the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall be used as a tool" actuated by humility" to
promote universal peace" love and unity among all men. !he #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall become a bro;er and
facilitator of peace a springboard for ascension and balance @ithin the @orld consciousness. !he
#)I!,+ S!'!,S shall immediately stand do@n and @ithdra@ itself from all acts of aggression and
vacate all occupied land and shall immediately bring all 'merican soldiers home.
!he agents and agencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall immediately cease and desist in all forms of
gun and drug production and distribution" all forms of terrorism an$
%enoci$e of the people& all standard operating procedure of the po@ers that be
since the days of the ,ast India trading Company.
'll 'dministrative 'gencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall immediately remove all gold fringed
military flags from their offices and courtrooms and shall display the civilian flag of peace. !he Custodian
of the 'lien Property shall immediately update hisFher files" removing the names and private property of
the 'merican people from their filesFlists and ma;e the return of the property to the rightful o@ners. 'll
administrative agencies and administrative courts shall operate in peace and honor" servants of the
sovereign people.
Servus Servorum Dei
Civil -lag Of Peace
he -urisdiction of the courts of the united states is described as the 'merican flag of peace; red, white and blue
with stri!es of red and white hori/ontally !laced in alteration. >nder the -urisdiction of the )merican flag of
!eace the !rivate rights of the sovereign !eo!le of the united states are !rotected and all rights are !reserved.
1ere, the Peo!le are Jinnocent until !roven guilty.K >nder the military gold fringed flag there are no rights.
!1, &'E O- !1, -&'6
he +aw of the #lag, an *nternational +aw, which is recogni/ed by every nation of the !lanet, a vessel is a !art of
the territory of the nation whose flag she flies and designates the '*21S under which a shi! owner, who sends
his vessel into a foreign !ort, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the shi! master that he
intends the +aw of that #lag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its o!eration or not
contract with him or his agent at all. Pursuant to the =+aw of the #lag,= a military flag does result in
-urisdictional im!lications when flown. It could mean E'2.
By the doctrine of =four cornering= the flag establishes the law of the country that it re!resents, i.e. the embassies
of foreign countries, in Washington D..., are =four cornered= by walls or fencing, creating an =enclave. = Within
the boundaries of the =enclave= of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the
-urisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the +aw of the #lag and international
treaty. When you enter an embassy, you are sub-ect to the laws of that country, -ust as if you board a shi! flying a
foreign flag, you will be sub-ect to the laws of that flag, enforceable by the =master of the shi!,= ?.a!tain@, by
the law of the flag.
The general post office known as the UNITED STATES now flies
the Civil Flag of Peace of the united states of Aerica!
The attachment of gold fringe on the flag constitutes a mutilation of the flag and represents "color of
law" jurisdiction and suspends the people's private rights. The military shall not try civilians as it
constitutes an act of "A# against the people.
The Civilian Flag of the united States of America, with no fringe, takes precedence over all other
flags it is the superior flag and esta$lishes the civil %urisdiction of the united States of America, and
the laws made in pursuance thereof.
&A" F'#(
he general !ost office styled as the >H*ED S)ES is a free re!ublic o!erating under the conce!ts
and intent of the )rticles $f .onfederation, establishing a !er!etual >nion between the several free and
inde!endent states, to witF
*. he Style of this .onfederacy shall be =he >nited States of )merica=.
**. Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and inde!endence, and every !ower, -urisdiction, and
right, which is not by this .onfederation e&!ressly delegated to the >nited States, in .ongress assembled.
Servus Servorum Dei
***. he said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their
common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to
assist each other, against all force offered to, or attac"s made u!on them, or any of them, on account of religion,
sovereignty, trade, or any other !retense whatever.
*Q. he better to secure and !er!etuate mutual friendshi! and intercourse among the !eo!le of the
different States in this >nion, the free inhabitants of each of these States, !au!ers, vagabonds, and fugitives from
-ustice e&ce!ted, shall be entitled to all !rivileges and immunities of free citi/ens in the several States; and the
!eo!le of each State shall en-oy free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall en-oy therein all
the !rivileges of trade and commerce, sub-ect to the same duties, im!ositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants
thereof res!ectively, !rovided that such restrictions shall not e&tend so far as to !revent the removal of !ro!erty
im!orted into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; !rovided also that no im!osition,
duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the !ro!erty of the >nited States, or either of them.
*f any !erson guilty of, or charged with, treason, felony, or other high misdemeanor in any State, shall
flee from -ustice, and be found in any of the >nited States, he shall, u!on demand of the 2overnor or e&ecutive
!ower of the State from which he fled, be delivered u! and removed to the State having -urisdiction of his
offense.
#ull faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and -udicial !roceedings
of the courts and magistrates of every other State.
Q. #or the most convenient management of the general interests of the >nited States, delegates shall be
annually a!!ointed in such manner as the legislatures of each State shall direct, to meet in .ongress on the first
Monday in Hovember, in every year, with a !ower reserved to each State to recall its delegates, or any of them,
at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead for the remainder of the year.
Ho State shall be re!resented in .ongress by not less than two, nor more than seven members; and no
!erson shall be ca!able of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of si& years; nor shall any
!erson, being a delegate, be ca!able of holding any office under the >nited States, for which he, or another for
his benefit, receives any salary, fees or emolument of any "ind.
Each State shall maintain its own delegates in a meeting of the States, and while they act as members of
the committee of the States.
*n determining 0uestions in the >nited States in .ongress assembled, each State shall have one vote.
#reedom of s!eech and debate in .ongress shall not be im!eached or 0uestioned in any court or !lace
out of .ongress, and the members of .ongress shall be !rotected in their !ersons from arrests or im!risonments,
during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on .ongress, e&ce!t for treason, felony, or breach of
the !eace.
Q*. Ho State, without the consent of the >nited States in .ongress assembled, shall send any embassy to,
or receive any embassy from, or enter into any conference, agreement, alliance or treaty with any Ging, Prince or
State; nor shall any !erson holding any office of !rofit or trust under the >nited States, or any of them, acce!t
any !resent, emolument, office or title of any "ind whatever from any Ging, Prince or foreign State; nor shall the
>nited States in .ongress assembled, or any of them, grant any title of nobility.
Ho two or more States shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them,
without the consent of the >nited States in .ongress assembled, s!ecifying accurately the !ur!oses for which the
same is to be entered into, and how long it shall continue.
Ho State shall lay any im!osts or duties, which may interfere with any sti!ulations in treaties, entered
Servus Servorum Dei
into by the >nited States in .ongress assembled, with any Ging, Prince or State, in !ursuance of any treaties
already !ro!osed by .ongress, to the courts of #rance and S!ain.
Ho vessel of war shall be "e!t u! in time of !eace by any State, e&ce!t such number only, as shall be
deemed necessary by the >nited States in .ongress assembled, for the defense of such State, or its trade; nor
shall any body of forces be "e!t u! by any State in time of !eace, e&ce!t such number only, as in the -udgment of
the >nited States in .ongress assembled, shall be deemed re0uisite to garrison the forts necessary for the
defense of such State; but every State shall always "ee! u! a well,regulated and disci!lined militia, sufficiently
armed and accoutered, and shall !rovide and constantly have ready for use, in !ublic stores, a due number of
filed !ieces and tents, and a !ro!er 0uantity of arms, ammunition and cam! e0ui!age.
Ho State shall engage in any war without the consent of the >nited States in .ongress assembled, unless
such State be actually invaded by enemies, or shall have received certain advice of a resolution being formed by
some nation of *ndians to invade such State, and the danger is so imminent as not to admit of a delay till the
>nited States in .ongress assembled can be consulted; nor shall any State grant commissions to any shi!s or
vessels of war, nor letters of mar0ue or re!risal, e&ce!t it be after a declaration of war by the >nited States in
.ongress assembled, and then only against the Gingdom or State and the sub-ects thereof, against which war has
been so declared, and under such regulations as shall be established by the >nited States in .ongress assembled,
unless such State be infested by !irates, in which case vessels of war may be fitted out for that occasion, and
"e!t so long as the danger shall continue, or until the >nited States in .ongress assembled shall determine
otherwise.
Q**. When land forces are raised by any State for the common defense, all officers of or under the ran"
of colonel, shall be a!!ointed by the legislature of each State res!ectively, by whom such forces shall be raised,
or in such manner as such State shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled u! by the State which first made the
a!!ointment.
Q***. )ll charges of war, and all other e&!enses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general
welfare, and allowed by the >nited States in .ongress assembled, shall be defrayed out of a common treasury,
which shall be su!!lied by the several States in !ro!ortion to the value of all land within each State, granted or
surveyed for any !erson, as such land and the buildings and im!rovements thereon shall be estimated according
to such mode as the >nited States in .ongress assembled, shall from time to time direct and a!!oint.
he ta&es for !aying that !ro!ortion shall be laid and levied by the authority and direction of the
legislatures of the several States within the time agreed u!on by the >nited States in .ongress assembled.
*R. he >nited States in .ongress assembled, shall have the sole and e&clusive right and !ower of
determining on !eace and war, e&ce!t in the cases mentioned in the si&th article ,, of sending and receiving
ambassadors ,, entering into treaties and alliances, !rovided that no treaty of commerce shall be made whereby
the legislative !ower of the res!ective States shall be restrained from im!osing such im!osts and duties on
foreigners, as their own !eo!le are sub-ected to, or from !rohibiting the e&!ortation or im!ortation of any s!ecies
of goods or commodities whatsoever ,, of establishing rules for deciding in all cases, what ca!tures on land or
water shall be legal, and in what manner !ri/es ta"en by land or naval forces in the service of the >nited States
shall be divided or a!!ro!riated ,, of granting letters of mar0ue and re!risal in times of !eace ,, a!!ointing
courts for the trial of !iracy and felonies committed on the high seas and establishing courts for receiving and
determining finally a!!eals in all cases of ca!tures, !rovided that no member of .ongress shall be a!!ointed a
-udge of any of the said courts.
he >nited States in .ongress assembled shall also be the last resort on a!!eal in all dis!utes and
Servus Servorum Dei
differences now subsisting or that hereafter may arise between two or more States concerning boundary,
-urisdiction or any other causes whatever; which authority shall always be e&ercised in the manner following.
Whenever the legislative or e&ecutive authority or lawful agent of any State in controversy with another shall
!resent a !etition to .ongress stating the matter in 0uestion and !raying for a hearing, notice thereof shall be
given by order of .ongress to the legislative or e&ecutive authority of the other State in controversy, and a day
assigned for the a!!earance of the !arties by their lawful agents, who shall then be directed to a!!oint by -oint
consent, commissioners or -udges to constitute a court for hearing and determining the matter in 0uestionF but if
they cannot agree, .ongress shall name three !ersons out of each of the >nited States, and from the list of such
!ersons each !arty shall alternately stri"e out one, the !etitioners beginning, until the number shall be reduced to
thirteen; and from that number not less than seven, nor more than nine names as .ongress shall direct, shall in
the !resence of .ongress be drawn out by lot, and the !ersons whose names shall be so drawn or any five of
them, shall be commissioners or -udges, to hear and finally determine the controversy, so always as a ma-or !art
of the -udges who shall hear the cause shall agree in the determinationF and if either !arty shall neglect to attend
at the day a!!ointed, without showing reasons, which .ongress shall -udge sufficient, or being !resent shall
refuse to stri"e, the .ongress shall !roceed to nominate three !ersons out of each State, and the secretary of
.ongress shall stri"e in behalf of such !arty absent or refusing; and the -udgment and sentence of the court to be
a!!ointed, in the manner before !rescribed, shall be final and conclusive; and if any of the !arties shall refuse to
submit to the authority of such court, or to a!!ear or defend their claim or cause, the court shall nevertheless
!roceed to !ronounce sentence, or -udgment, which shall in li"e manner be final and decisive, the -udgment or
sentence and other !roceedings being in either case transmitted to .ongress, and lodged among the acts of
.ongress for the security of the !arties concernedF !rovided that every commissioner, before he sits in -udgment,
shall ta"e an oath to be administered by one of the -udges of the su!reme or su!erior court of the State, where the
cause shall be tried, Nwell and truly to hear and determine the matter in 0uestion, according to the best of his
-udgment, without favor, affection or ho!e of rewardNF !rovided also, that no State shall be de!rived of territory
for the benefit of the >nited States.
)ll controversies concerning the !rivate right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more
States, whose -urisdictions as they may res!ect such lands, and the States which !assed such grants are ad-usted,
the said grants or either of them being at the same time claimed to have originated antecedent to such settlement
of -urisdiction, shall on the !etition of either !arty to the .ongress of the >nited States, be finally determined as
near as may be in the same manner as is before !rescribed for deciding dis!utes res!ecting territorial -urisdiction
between different States.
he >nited States in .ongress assembled shall also have the sole and e&clusive right and !ower of
regulating the alloy and value of coin struc" by their own authority, or by that of the res!ective States ,, fi&ing
the standards of weights and measures throughout the >nited States ,, regulating the trade and managing all
affairs with the *ndians, not members of any of the States, !rovided that the legislative right of any State within
its own limits be not infringed or violated ,, establishing or regulating !ost offices from one State to another,
throughout all the >nited States, and e&acting such !ostage on the !a!ers !assing through the same as may be
re0uisite to defray the e&!enses of the said office ,, a!!ointing all officers of the land forces, in the service of the
>nited States, e&ce!ting regimental officers ,, a!!ointing all the officers of the naval forces, and commissioning
all officers whatever in the service of the >nited States ,, ma"ing rules for the government and regulation of the
said land and naval forces, and directing their o!erations.
he >nited States in .ongress assembled shall have authority to a!!oint a committee, to sit in the recess
of .ongress, to be denominated N) .ommittee of the StatesN, and to consist of one delegate from each State; and
to a!!oint such other committees and civil officers as may be necessary for managing the general affairs of the
>nited States under their direction ,, to a!!oint one of their members to !reside, !rovided that no !erson be
allowed to serve in the office of !resident more than one year in any term of three years; to ascertain the
necessary sums of money to be raised for the service of the >nited States, and to a!!ro!riate and a!!ly the same
for defraying the !ublic e&!enses ,, to borrow money, or emit bills on the credit of the >nited States,
Servus Servorum Dei
transmitting every half,year to the res!ective States an account of the sums of money so borrowed or emitted
,, to build and e0ui! a navy ,, to agree u!on the number of land forces, and to ma"e re0uisitions from each State
for its 0uota, in !ro!ortion to the number of white inhabitants in such State; which re0uisition shall be binding,
and thereu!on the legislature of each State shall a!!oint the regimental officers, raise the men and clothe, arm
and e0ui! them in a solid,li"e manner, at the e&!ense of the >nited States; and the officers and men so clothed,
armed and e0ui!!ed shall march to the !lace a!!ointed, and within the time agreed on by the >nited States in
.ongress assembled. But if the >nited States in .ongress assembled shall, on consideration of circumstances
-udge !ro!er that any State should not raise men, or should raise a smaller number of men than the 0uota thereof,
such e&tra number shall be raised, officered, clothed, armed and e0ui!!ed in the same manner as the 0uota of
each State, unless the legislature of such State shall -udge that such e&tra number cannot be safely s!read out in
the same, in which case they shall raise, officer, clothe, arm and e0ui! as many of such e&tra number as they
-udge can be safely s!ared. )nd the officers and men so clothed, armed, and e0ui!!ed, shall march to the !lace
a!!ointed, and within the time agreed on by the >nited States in .ongress assembled.
he >nited States in .ongress assembled shall never engage in a war, nor grant letters of mar0ue or
re!risal in time of !eace, nor enter into any treaties or alliances, nor coin money, nor regulate the value thereof,
nor ascertain the sums and e&!enses necessary for the defense and welfare of the >nited States, or any of them,
nor emit bills, nor borrow money on the credit of the >nited States, nor a!!ro!riate money, nor agree u!on the
number of vessels of war, to be built or !urchased, or the number of land or sea forces to be raised, nor a!!oint a
commander in chief of the army or navy, unless nine States assent to the sameF nor shall a 0uestion on any other
!oint, e&ce!t for ad-ourning from day to day be determined, unless by the votes of the ma-ority of the >nited
States in .ongress assembled.
he .ongress of the >nited States shall have !ower to ad-ourn to any time within the year, and to any
!lace within the >nited States, so that no !eriod of ad-ournment be for a longer duration than the s!ace of si&
months, and shall !ublish the -ournal of their !roceedings monthly, e&ce!t such !arts thereof relating to treaties,
alliances or military o!erations, as in their -udgment re0uire secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the delegates of
each State on any 0uestion shall be entered on the -ournal, when it is desired by any delegates of a State, or any
of them, at his or their re0uest shall be furnished with a transcri!t of the said -ournal, e&ce!t such !arts as are
above e&ce!ted, to lay before the legislatures of the several States.
R. he .ommittee of the States, or any nine of them, shall be authori/ed to e&ecute, in the recess of
.ongress, such of the !owers of .ongress as the >nited States in .ongress assembled, by the consent of the nine
States, shall from time to time thin" e&!edient to vest them with; !rovided that no !ower be delegated to the said
.ommittee, for the e&ercise of which, by the )rticles of .onfederation, the voice of nine States in the .ongress
of the >nited States assembled be re0uisite.
R*. .anada acceding to this confederation, and ad-oining in the measures of the >nited States, shall be
admitted into, and entitled to all the advantages of this >nion; but no other colony shall be admitted into the
same, unless such admission be agreed to by nine States.
R**. )ll bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of
.ongress, before the assembling of the >nited States, in !ursuance of the !resent confederation, shall be deemed
and considered as a charge against the >nited States, for !ayment and satisfaction whereof the said >nited
States, and the !ublic faith are hereby solemnly !ledged.
Servus Servorum Dei
R***. Every State shall abide by the determination of the >nited States in .ongress assembled, on all
0uestions which by this confederation are submitted to them. )nd the )rticles of this .onfederation shall be
inviolably observed by every State, and the >nion shall be !er!etual; nor shall any alteration at any time
hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a .ongress of the >nited States, and be
after wards confirmed by the legislatures of every State.
' B!ransitional CommitteeA shall be seated for the purpose of ensuring a peaceful
and efficient transition from an ,mpirical Ear based mentality and operating system to one of
peace" humility and unity. Said B!ransitional CommitteeA shall establish and empo@er an
interim government for the united states of 'merica and shall operate until such time as the
people can be duly informed as to the true history of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S and the fraud that
has been perpetrated against them" not to e$ceed one year.
!he Postmaster general of the organic post office for the united states" creator of the
general post office styled as the #)I!,+ S!'!,S and located @ithin the ten miles s%uare
commonly ;no@n as Eashington" +.C." under @hose direction the #)I!,+ S!'!,S operates"
shall operate in the capacity of trustee for the people and shall ta;e instructions from the
B!ransitional CommitteeA until such time as the Interim government shall be seated and
empo@ered.
he >H*ED S)ESN courts are administrative courts who gain their authority under itle 8, the )dministrative
Procedures )ct of 6:D5 andCor the 3udiciary )ct of 679:. hese )dministrative courts were established for the !ur!ose of
being the watch dog over !ublic offices so that if and when the )merican !eo!le had their !rivate rights violated they could
file a com!laint without cost.
hese administrative courts were designed to give the administrative court the !ower of legislation; the !ower of
the e&ecutive branch of government; to give them -udicial !ower and authority. hese administrative courts were authori/ed
to disregard laws, case cites, su!reme court decisions, statutes, codes, rules, regulations and to change !olicy. he
establishment of these administrative courts effectively created a fourth branch of government at the re0uest of the B)'
)ssociation.
*#!" this system @as designed for use *G the 'merican people" )O! '6'I)S! the 'merican people. hese
administrative courts have -urisdiction $H+L over administrative agencies and H$ over the )merican !eo!le and were
established as a vehicle for use by the )merican !eo!le to lodge and ad-udicate a grievance against any administrative
agency and gave this administrative court the !ower and authority to ma"e the corrections without the lengthy !rocess of
introducing and !assing legislation. .harges can only be levied )2)*HS an administrative agency BL 1E )ME'*.)H
PE$P+E and cannot be used against the )merican !eo!le. he !eo!le are )+W)LS the Plaintiff in these )dministrative
courts e&ce!t when these courts are used to !er!etrate a fraud against the )merican Peo!le.
.ongress, under D: Statute %E:7 reaty Series 996 .onventions and Duties and 'ights of the States, !laced all
states under international law, ma"ing all courts, *nternational courts. he *nternational $rgani/ation *mmunities )ct 6:D8
!laced all courts under the -urisdiction of the >nited Hations under itle 44 .#' #oreign 'elations with $aths of $ffice
under section :4.64 and :4.%6. >nder itle 9 >S. 6D96 you voluntarily forfeit your citi/enshi! when you ta"e the $ath of
$ffice in these administrative courts, and establishes you as a foreign agent re0uired to register as a foreign agent doing
business in the state.
hese administrative courts, who gain their authority under itle 8 were designed to ma"e the corrections within
!ublic offices, to ma"e them more efficient and to hold agencies, and officers thereof, accountable for their actions. *n these
administrative courts only the )merican !eo!le can bring the charges for the corrections and the )merican !eo!le are
)+W)LS the PlaintiffC harmed Party. hese courts have H$ 3>'*SD*.*$H over the !eo!le. Ho agency has the authority
Servus Servorum Dei
to bring charges against the )merican !eo!le or their !rivate rights and !ro!erty in an administrative court under the
)dministrative Procedures )ct.
!hese 'dministrative Courts shall operate as established" for the purpose of
facilitating the prosecution of grievances against an administrative agency by the
'merican people for the administrative agencies trespass on the private rights of the
sovereign people of 'merica.

)DM*H*S')*QE H$*.E
FS S5%. )m.3ur.4d, Public $fficers and Em!loyees, T4D7S ;)s e&!ressed otherwise, the !owers delegated to a !ublic
officer are held in trust for the !eo!le and are to be e&ercised in behalf of the government or of all citi/ens who may need
the intervention of the officer. A6B #urthermore, the view has been e&!ressed that all !ublic officers, within whatever branch
and whatever level of government, and whatever be their !rivate vocations, are trustees of the !eo!le, and accordingly labor
under every disability and !rohibition im!osed by law u!on trustees relative to the ma"ing of !ersonal financial gain from a
discharge of their trusts. A4B hat is, a !ublic officer occu!ies a fiduciary relationshi! to the !olitical entity on whose behalf
he or she serves. A%B and owes a fiduciary duty to the !ublic. ADB *t
has been said that the fiduciary res!onsibilities of a !ublic officer cannot be less than those of a !rivate individual. A8B
#urthermore, it has been stated that any enter!rise underta"en by the !ublic official who tends to wea"en !ublic confidence
and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against !ublic !olicy. #raud in its elementary common law
sense of deceit,and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears AD9% >.S. %74B in the statute. See >nited States v. Dial, 787
#.4d 65%, 659 ?7th .ir6:98@ includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation.
) !ublic official is a fiduciary toward the !ublic, including, in the case of a -udge, the litigants who a!!ear before him and if
he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud. McHally v >nited States D9% >.S. %8E ?6:97@
e&as Penal .ode Sec. 6.E7. DE#*H**$HS. ?a@ *n this codeF Aconsistent with all state !enal codesB
?:@ =.oercion= means a threat, however communicatedF
?)@ to commit an offense;
?B@ to inflict bodily in-ury in the future on the !erson threatened or another;
?.@ to accuse a !erson of any offense;
?D@ to e&!ose a !erson to hatred, contem!t, or ridicule;
?E@ to harm the credit or business re!ute of any !erson; or
?#@ to ta"e or withhold action as a !ublic servant, or to cause a !ublic servant to ta"e or
withhold action.
?6:@ =Effective consent= includes consent by a !erson legally authori/ed to act for the owner.
.onsent is not effective ifF
?)@ induced by force, threat, or fraud;
?B@ given by a !erson the actor "nows is not legally authori/ed to act for the owner;
?.@ given by a !erson who by reason of youth, mental disease or defect, or into&ication
is "nown by the actor to be unable to ma"e reasonable decisions; or
?D@ given solely to detect the commission of an offense.
?4D@ =2overnment= meansF
?)@ the state;
?B@ a county, munici!ality, or !olitical subdivision of the state; or
?.@ any branch or agency of the state, a county, munici!ality, or !olitical subdivision.
?%E@ =+aw= means the constitution or a statute of this state or of the >nited States, a written o!inion of a court of
record, a munici!al ordinance, an order of a county commissioners court, or a rule authori/ed by and
lawfully ado!ted under a statute.
?D6@ =Public servant= means a !erson elected, selected, a!!ointed, em!loyed, or otherwise designated as one of
the following, even if he has not yet 0ualified for office or assumed his dutiesF
?)@ an officer, em!loyee, or agent of government;
Servus Servorum Dei
?B@ a -uror or grand -uror; or
?.@ an arbitrator, referee, or other !erson who is authori/ed by law or !rivate written agreement to hear
or determine a cause or controversy; or
?D@ an attorney at law or notary !ublic when !artici!ating in the !erformance of a governmental
function; or
?E@ a candidate for nomination or election to !ublic office; or
?#@ a !erson who is !erforming a governmental function under a claim of right although he is not legally
0ualified to do so.
'&& CO#2!S 1'0, *,,) OP,2'!I)6 #)+,2
<1= TR!"N# $"T% T%& &N&'( )T 'S CO+I-I,+ I) !I!&, 30 #SC"
?4@ !I!&, 2> #SC" C1'P!,2 17H" *&!&R+ !&BT ),++&)T",N -R,)&!.R&" ')+
?%@ -,+.2.CI0.P. 9<C= #)+,2 !I!&, 2> #SC T1H0>" ('II)6 !1, CO#2!S B-O2,I6)
S!'!,SA !O !1, P,OP&, *G CO)62,SSIO)'& (')+'!,
JI! IS !1, +#!G O- !1, CO#2! !O +,C&'2, !1, (,')I)6 O- E1'! IS E2I!!,)" ')+ )O! E1'!
E'S I)!,)+,+ !O *, E2I!!,). J.E. Seavey 1op Corp. v. Polloc;" 20 En.2d ..7".9>:95" 197 P.2d .10 <1599="
cited @ith approval in *erg v. 1udesman" 113 En2d at HH5.

O'!1 O- O--IC, ('I,S P#*&IC O--ICI'&S B-O2,I6)A
6. hose holding #ederal or State !ublic office, andCor county or munici!al office, under the +egislative, E&ecutive or
3udicial branch, including .ourt $fficials, 3udges, Prosecutors, +aw Enforcement De!artment em!loyees, $fficers of the
.ourt, etc., before entering into these !ublic offices, are re0uired by the >.S. .onstitution and statutory law to com!ly with
itle 8 >S., Sec. T%%%6, ;$ath of office.< State $fficials are also re0uired to meet this same obligation, according to State
.onstitutions and State statutory law.
4. )ll oaths of office come under 44 .#', #oreign 'elations, Sections TT:4.64 , :4.%E, and all who hold !ublic office come
under itle 9 >S., Section T6D96 ;+oss of nationality by native,born or naturali/ed citi/en; voluntary action; burden of
!roof; !resum!tions.<
%. >nder itle 44 >S., #oreign 'elations and *ntercourse, Section T566, a Public $fficial is considered a foreign agent. *n
order to hold !ublic office, the candidate must file a true and com!lete registration statement with the State )ttorney
2eneral as a foreign !rinci!le.
D. he $ath of $ffice re0uires the !ublic official in his C her foreign state ca!acity to u!hold the constitutional form of
government or face conse0uences.
itle 6E >S., Sec. T%%%, ;*nterference with State and #ederal law<
he President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall ta"e such
measures as he considers necessary to su!!ress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful
combination, or cons!iracy, if itU
?6@ so hinders the e&ecution of the laws of that State, and of the >nited States within the State, that
any !art or class of its !eo!le is de!rived of a right, !rivilege, immunity, or !rotection named in the
.onstitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to
!rotect that right, !rivilege, or immunity, or to give that !rotection; or
?4@ o!!oses or obstructs the e&ecution of the laws of the >nited States or im!edes the course of
-ustice under those laws.
Servus Servorum Dei
*n any situation covered by clause ?6@, the State shall be considered to have denied the e0ual !rotection of
the laws secured by the .onstitution.
8. Such willful action, while serving in official ca!acity, violates itle 69 >S., Section T6:69F
!itle 1> #SC" Section K151> B+isloyalty and asserting the right to stri;e against the governmentA
Whoever violates the !rovision of 7%66 of title 8 that an individual may not acce!t or hold a !osition in
the 2overnment of the >nited States or the government of the District of .olumbia if heU
?6@ advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; ?4@ is a member of an organi/ation
that he "nows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
shall be fined under this title or im!risoned not more than one year and a day, or both.
and also de!rives claimants of ;honest servicesF
!itle 1>" Section K1.9H. +efinition of Bscheme or artifice to defraudA
;#or the !ur!oses of this cha!ter, the term ;scheme or artifice to defraud< includes a scheme or artifice to
de!rive another of the intangible right of honest services.
and the treaties that !laced your !ublic offices in that foreign state under international law and under the
>nited Hation -urisdiction
D: Stat. %E:7; reaty Series 996 .$HQEH*$H $H '*21S )HD D>*ES $# S)ES
6:D8 *$*) OThat the International Organizations Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 9! Title 22, Sections 2"" to 2""
#.S.$.% the >S relin0uished every office
*+E 9 V .1)PE' 64 V S>B.1)PE' * V T 66E6
he term ;foreign state< includes outlying !ossessions of a foreign state, but self,governing dominions or territories under
mandate or trusteeshi! shall be regarded as se!arate foreign states.
!'*&, O- '#!1O2I!I,S 8 2,CIP2OC'& I((#)I!G ')+ -O2,I6) '6,)! 2,6IS!2'!IO)
>H*ED S)ES *HE'H)*$H)+ $'2)H*W)*$HS *MM>H**ES ).,
P>B+*. +)W 7:,4:6, 4: DE.EMBE' 6:D8?Public +aw 4:6,7:th .ongress@ *+E * Section 4.?b@ *nternational
organi/ations, their !ro!erty and their assets, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall en-oy the same immunity
from suit and every form of 3udicial !rocess as is en-oyed by foreign governments, e&ce!t to the e&tent that such
organi/ations may e&!ressly waive their immunity for the !ur!ose of any !roceedings or by the terms of any contract. ?d@ *n
so far as concerns customs duties and internal,revenue ta&es im!osed u!on or by reason of im!ortation, and the !rocedures
in connection therewith; the registration of foreign agents; and the treatment of official communications, the !rivileges,
e&em!tions, and immunities to which international organi/ations shall be entitled shall be those accorded under similar
circumstances to foreign governments. Section :. he !rivileges, e&em!tions, and immunities of international organi/ations
and of their officers and em!loyees, and members of their families, suites, and servants, !rovided for in this title, shall be
granted notwithstanding the fact that the similar !rivileges, e&em!tions, and immunities granted to a foreign government, its
officers, or em!loyees, may be conditioned u!on the e&istence of reci!rocity by that foreign governmentF Provided, hat
nothing contained in this title shall be construed as !recluding the Secretary of State from withdrawing the !rivileges,
e&em!tions, and immunities herein !rovided from !ersons who are nationals of any foreign country on the ground that such
country is failing to accord corres!onding !rivileges, e&em!tions, and immunities to citi/ens of the >nited States. )lso see
44 >S. T 566 , #$'E*2H 'E+)*$HS )HD *HE'.$>'SE; and, 44 >S. T 564, 'egistration statement, concerning
the absolute re0uirement of registration with the )ttorney 2eneral as a ;foreign !rinci!al,< due to the undis!uted status of
the court and its alleged officers and em!loyees as #$'E*2H )2EHS, described s!pra. his re0uirement shall be deemed
to include, but is not limited to, an affidavit of non,communist association.

J#+6, S,20,S 'S ' +,*! CO&&,C!O2
Servus Servorum Dei
5. 3udges hold !ublic office under itle 49 >S., .ha!ter 675, #ederal Debt .ollection ProcedureF
itle 49, .ha!ter 675, #ederal Debt .ollection Procedure, Section T%EE4
)s used in this cha!terF
?4@ ;.ourt< means any court created by the .ongress of the >nited States, e&cluding the >nited States
a& .ourt. ?%@ ;Debt< meansU
?)@ an amount that is owing to the >nited States on account of a direct loan, or loan insured or
guaranteed, by the >nited States; or ?B@ an amount that is owing to the >nited States on account of a fee,
duty, lease, rent, service, sale of real or !ersonal !ro!erty, over!ayment, fine, assessment, !enalty,
restitution, damages, interest, ta&, bail bond forfeiture, reimbursement, recovery of a cost incurred by the
>nited States, or other source of indebtedness to the >nited States, but that is not owing under the terms
of a contract originally entered into by only !ersons other than the >nited States;
?9@ ;3udgment< means a -udgment, order, or decree entered in favor of the >nited States in a court and
arising from a civil or criminal !roceeding regarding a debt. ?68@ ;>nited States< meansU
?)@ a #ederal cor!oration; ?B@ an agency, de!artment, commission, board, or other entity of the >nited
States; or ?.@ an instrumentality of the >nited States.

itle 44 >S., Sec. T495. ;)cce!tance of membershi! by >nited States in *nternational Monetary #und,< states the
followingF
he President is hereby authori/ed to acce!t membershi! for the >nited States in the *nternational
Monetary #und ?hereinafter referred to as the =#und=@, and in the *nternational Ban" for 'econstruction and
Develo!ment ?hereinafter referred to as the =Ban"=@, !rovided for by the )rticles of )greement of the #und
and the )rticles of )greement of the Ban" as set forth in the #inal )ct of the >nited Hations Monetary and
#inancial .onference dated 3uly 44, 6:DD, and de!osited in the archives of the De!artment of State.
9. itle 44 >S., Sec. T 495e,6%, ;)!!roval of fund !ledge to sell gold to !rovide resources for 'eserve )ccount of
Enhanced Structural )d-ustment #acility rust,< states the followingF
he Secretary of the reasury is authori/ed to instruct the #undNs !ledge to sell, if needed, u! to %,EEE,EEE
ounces of the #undNs gold, to restore the resources of the 'eserve )ccount of the Enhanced Structural
)d-ustment #acility rust to a level that would be sufficient to meet obligations of the rust !ayable to
lenders which have made loans to the +oan )ccount of the rust that have been used for the !ur!ose of
financing !rograms to #und members !reviously in arrears to the #und.

)O I((#)I!G #)+,2 BCO((,2C,A
:. )ll immunity of the >nited States, and all liability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials have been
waived under commerce, according to the following >S .odesF
itle 68 >S., .ommerce, Sec. T6644, ;+iability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials<
?a@ Waiver of sovereign immunity by the >nited States. he >nited States, all agencies and
instrumentalities thereof, and all individuals, firms, cor!orations, other !ersons acting for the >nited States
and with the authori/ation and consent of the >nited States, shall not be immune from suit in #ederal or
State court by any !erson, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for any violation under
this )ct. ?b@ Waiver of sovereign immunity by States. )ny State, instrumentality of a State or any officer or
em!loyee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official ca!acity, shall not be immune,
under the eleventh amendment of the .onstitution of the >nited States or under any other doctrine of
sovereign immunity, from suit in #ederal court by any !erson, including any governmental or
nongovernmental entity for any violation under this )ct.
itle D4 >S., Sec. T644E4, ;State immunity<
) State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the .onstitution of the >nited States from an
Servus Servorum Dei
action in #ederal or State court of com!etent -urisdiction for a violation of this cha!ter. *n any action
against a State for a violation of the re0uirements of this cha!ter, remedies ?including remedies both at law
and in e0uity@ are available for such a violation to the same e&tent as such remedies are available for such a
violation in an action against any !ublic or !rivate entity other than a State
!itle 92 #SC" Sec. K2000d87" BCivil rights remedies e%ualiLationA
?a@ 2eneral !rovision
?6@ ) State shall not be immune under the Eleventh )mendment of the .onstitution of the >nited States from suit
in #ederal court for a violation of section 8ED of the 'ehabilitation )ct of 6:7% A4: >.S... 7:DB, title *R of the
Education )mendments of 6:74 A4E >.S... 6596 et se0.B, the )ge Discrimination )ct of 6:78 AD4 >.S... 56E6 et
se0.B, title Q* of the .ivil 'ights )ct of 6:5D AD4 >.S... 4EEEd et se0.B, or the !rovisions of any other #ederal
statute !rohibiting discrimination by reci!ients of #ederal financial assistance. ?4@ *n a suit against a State for a
violation of a statute referred to in !aragra!h ?6@, remedies ?including remedies both at law and in e0uity@ are
available for such a violation to the same e&tent as such remedies are available for such a violation in the suit
against any !ublic or !rivate entity other than a State.
6E. he )dministrative Procedure )ct of 6:D5 gives immunity in )dministrative .ourt to the )dministrative +aw 3udge
?)+3@ only when an action is brought by the !eo!le against a !ublic, agency or cor!orate official C de!artment. >nder itle 8
>S., .ommerce, !ublic offices or officials can be sanctioned.
itle 8, >S., Sec. T886F
?6E@ ;sanction< includes the whole or a !art of an agencyU
?)@ !rohibition, re0uirement, limitation, or other condition affecting the freedom of a !erson;?B@
withholding of relief;?.@ im!osition of !enalty or fine;?D@ destruction, ta"ing, sei/ure, or withholding of
!ro!erty;?E@ assessment of damages, reimbursement, restitution, com!ensation, costs, charges, or fees;?#@
re0uirement, revocation, or sus!ension of a license; or
?2@ ta"ing other com!ulsory or restrictive action;
66. 3ustice is re0uired to be B+*HD while holding a SE $# S.)+ES and a W$,ED2ED SW$'D. his symboli/es
true -ustice. he )dministrative Procedure )ct of 6:D5 ?5E stat 4%7@ would allow the sword to cut in either direction and
give the -udge immunity by holding his own court office accountable for honest service fraud, obstruction of -ustice, false
statements, malicious !rosecution and fraud !laced u!on the court. )ny willful intent to uncover the ELES $# 3>S*.E or
*+ 1E S.)+ES is a willful intent to deny Due Process, which violates itle 69 >S. T6%D5, ;Scheme or )rtifice to
Defraud,< by !er!etrating a scheme or artifice to de!rive another of the intangible right of honest services. his is
considered fraud and an overthrow of a constitutional form of government and the !erson de!riving the honest service can
be held accountable and face !unishment under itle 69 >S. and itle D4 >S. and violates itle 49 >S. -udicial
!rocedures.
64. Both itle 69 >S., .rime and .riminal Procedure, and itle D4 >S., Public 1ealth and Welfare, allow the Petitioner
to bring an action against the >nited States andCor the State agencies, de!artments, and em!loyees for civil rights violations
while dealing in commerce. itle 6E !laces all !ublic officials under this itle6E section %%% while under a state of
emergency. ?Declared or undeclared War this falls under WE).@
CO#2!S OP,2'!I)6 #)+,2 E'2 POE,2S 'C!
6%. he .ourts are o!erating under the Emergency War Powers )ct. he country has been under a declared ;state of
emergency< for the !ast 7E years resulting in the .onstitution being sus!ended ?See itle 8E >S. )!!endi& O rading with
the Enemy )ct of 6:67@. he .ourts have been misusing itle 8E >S., Sec. T4%, ;3urisdiction of >nited States courts and
-udges,< which !rovides for criminal -urisdiction over an ;enemy of the state,< whereas, Petitioner comes under itle 8E
Servus Servorum Dei
>S. )!!endi& )!!lication Sec. T46, ;Claims of naturaliLed citiLens as affected by e$patriation< which states the
followingF
he claim of any naturali/ed )merican citi/en under the !rovisions of this )ct Asections 6 to 5, 7 to %:, and
D6 to DD of this )!!endi&B shall not be denied on the ground of any presumption of e$patriation which
has arisen against him, under the second sentence of section 4 of the )ct entitled ;)n )ct in reference to the
e&!atriation of citi/ens and their !rotection abroad,< a!!roved March 4, 6:E7, if he shall give satisfactory
evidence to the President, or the court, as the case may be, of his uninterru!ted loyalty to the >nited States
during his absence, and that he has returned to the >nited States, or that he, although desiring to return, has
been !revented from so returning by circumstances beyond his control.
6D. 68 Statutes at +arge, .ha!ter 4D: ?section 6@, enacted 3uly 47 6959, states the followingF
P'E)MB+E , 'ights of )merican citi/ens in foreign states.
W1E'E)S the right of e&!atriation is a natural and inherent right of all !eo!le, indis!ensable to the
en-oyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the !ursuit of ha!!iness; and whereas in the recognition of this
!rinci!le this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights
of citi/enshi!; and whereas it is claimed that such )merican citi/ens, with their descendants, are sub-ects of
foreign states, owing allegiance to the governments thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance
of !ublic !eace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be !rom!tly and finally disavowed.
SE.*$H * , 'ight of e&!atriation declared.
1E'E#$'E, Be it enacted by the Senate of the and 1ouse of 'e!resentatives of the >nited States of
)merica in .ongress assembled, hat any declaration, instruction, o!inion, order, or decision of any
officers of this government which denies, restricts, im!airs, or 0uestions the right of e&!atriation, is hereby
declared inconsistent with the fundamental !rinci!les of this government.
SE.*$H ** , Protection to naturali/ed citi/ens in foreign states.
)nd it is further enacted, hat all naturali/ed citi/ens of the >nited States, while in foreign states, shall be
entitled to, and shall receive from this government, the same !rotection of !ersons and !ro!erty that is
accorded to native born citi/ens in li"e situations and circumstances.
SE.*$H *** , 'elease of citi/ens im!risoned by foreign governments to be demanded.
)nd it is further enacted, hat whenever it shall be made "nown to the President that any citi/en of the
>nited States has been un-ustly de!rived of his liberty by or under the authority of any foreign government,
it shall be the duty of the President forthwith to demand of that government the reasons for such
im!risonment, and if it a!!ears to be wrongful and in the violation of the rights of )merican citi/enshi!, the
President shall forthwith demand the release of such citi/en, and if the release so demanded is unreasonably
delayed or refused, it shall be the duty of the President to use such means, not amounting to acts of war, as
he may thin" necessary and !ro!er to obtain or effectuate such release, and all the facts and !roceedings
relative thereto shall as soon as !racticable be communicated by the President to .ongress.
)!!roved, 3uly 47, 6959
68 he .ourts and the States are enforcing the following code on )merican nationalsF itle 8E >S. )!!endi& )!!,
rading, )ct, Sec. TD, ;+icenses to enemy or ally of enemy insurance or reinsurance com!anies; change of name; doing
business in >nited States,< as a result of the !assage of he )mendatory )ct of March :, 6:%% to itle 8E >S., rading
with the Enemy )ct Public +aw Ho. 58,:6 ?DE Stat. +. D66@ $ctober 5, 6:67. he original rading with the Enemy )ct
e$cluded the !eo!le of the >nited States from being classified as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly within
the >nited States. he )mendatory )ct of March :, 6:%%, however, included the people of the #nited States as the
enemy" by incor!orating the following language into the rading With he Enemy )ctF ;by any person @ithin the #nited
Servus Servorum Dei
States.< he abuses !er!etrated u!on the )merican !eo!le are the result of itle 8E >S., rading With he Enemy )ct,
which turned the )merican !eo!le into ;enemy of the state.
&')6#'6, )O! C&'2I-I,+
65. .larification of languageF
he S!'!,S has failed to state the meaning or clarify the definition of words. he courts !ursuant to the #ederal 'ules
of .ivil Procedure ?#'.P@ 'ule D?-@, are, in fact and at law, a #$'E*2H S)E as defined in itle 49 >S. T65E4, et. se0.,
he #$'E*2H S$QE'E*2H *MM>H**ES ). of 6:75, Pub. +. :D,89% ?hereafter #S*)@, and, therefore, lac"
-urisdiction over the sovereign !eo!le. . )ny failure to s!ecifically state the -urisdiction of the court violates 69 >S. T6EE6,
T68E8, and T4%%6 and the P)'*$ )., Section 9EE, Domestic terrorism.
67. here are three different and distinct forms of the ;#nited States< as revealed by this case lawF
;he high .ourt confirmed that the term =>nited States= can and does mean three com!letely different
things, de!ending on the conte&t.< 1ooven X )llison .o. vs. Evatt, %4D >.S. 584 ?6:D8@ X "nited States v.
Cr!i#s$an#, :4 >.S. 8D4 ?6975@ X >nited States v. Bevans, 65 >.S. % Wheat. %%5 %%5 ?6969@
he .ourts and its officers fail to state which >nited States they re!resent, since they can re!resent only one, the #ederal
Debt .ollection Procedure, as a cor!oration, the >nited States, *nc., and itKs satellite cor!orations have no -urisdiction over
an )merican national and a belligerent claimant, the !eo!le hereby assert their right of immunity inherent in the 66th
amendmentF ;T$e %!diial po&er s$all not be onstr!ed to extend to any s!it in la& or e'!ity, o((ened or prose!ted
against one of t$e "nited States by iti)ens of anot$er state, or by iti)ens of any *oreign State.< he court, by definition
are a #$'E*2H S)E, and are misusing the name of the Sovereign )merican by !lacing Sovereign )merican Ks name in
all ca!ital letters, as well as by using Sovereign )merican Ks last name to construe Sovereign )merican, erroneously, as a
;!erson< which is a ;term of art< meaningF a reat!re of t$e la&, an artifiial being, and a CO+,O+ATION or ens legis-
;.ns /egis. +. +at. ) creature of the law; an artificial being, as contrasted with a natural !erson. )!!lied to cor!orations,
considered as deriving their e&istence entirely from the law.< UBlac"s +aw Dictionary, Dth Edition, 6:86.
69. )ll com!laints and suits against such .$'P$')*$H, or ens legis, fall under the aforementioned #S*) and service of
!rocess must therefore be made by the cler" of the court, under Section 65E9?a@?D@ of itle 49 >S., 5% Stat. 666, as
amended ?44 >.S... 4589@ AD4 #' 5%57, #eb. 4, 6:77, as amended at 5% #' 65597, )!r. 5, 6::9B, to the Director of the
$ffice of S!ecial .onsular Services in the Bureau of .onsular )ffairs, De!artment of State, in Washington, D...,
e&clusively, !ursuant to 44 .#' T:%.6 and T:%.4. ) co!y of the #S*) must be filed with the com!laint along with ;a
certified co!y of the di!lomatic note of transmittal,< and, ;the certification shall state the date and !lace the documents were
delivered.< he foregoing must be served u!on the .hief E&ecutive $fficer and u!on the 'egistered )gent of the
designated .$'P$')*$H or #$'E*2H S)E.
6:. M>H*.*P)+, .$>HL, or S)E .$>'S lac" -urisdiction to hear any case since they fall under the definition of
#$'E*2H S)E, and under all related definitions below. Said -urisdiction lies with the ;district court of the >nited
States,< established by .ongress in the states under )rticle *** of the .onstitution, which are ;constitutional courts< and do
not include the territorial courts created under )rticle *Q, Section %, .lause 4, which are ;legislative< courts. Hornb!#le v.
Too(bs, 98 >.S. 5D9, 46 +.Ed. :55 ?697%@, ?See itle 49 >S., 'ule 66E6@, e&clusively, under the #S*) Statutes !ursuant to
49 >S. T6%%E.
4E. *t is an undis!uted, conclusive !resum!tion that the Sovereign )mericans, the real !arties in interest are a not a
.$'P$')*$H, and, further, are not registered with any Secretary of State as a .$'P$')*$H. Pursuant to 'ule 64?b@
?5@, in these situations, the Prosecuting )ttorney has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted to the Defendant,
a #))+ DE#E., and, therefore, the instant case and all related matters must be D*SM*SSED W*1 P'E3>D*.E for
lac" of in persona(, territorial, and sub-ect matter -urisdiction, as well as for im!ro!er Qenue, as well as !ursuant to the
Servus Servorum Dei
66th amendment #oreign State *mmunity.
46. Moreover, the !rocess in the instant matters before these courts are not ;regular on their face.<
'egular on its #ace ,, ;Process is said to be ;regular on its face< when it !roceeds from the court, officer, or body having
authority of law to issue !rocess of that nature, and which is legal in form, and contains nothing to notify, or fairly a!!rise
any one that it is issued without authority.<
CO#2! &'CIS J#+ICI'& POE,2 I) &'E O2 ,M#I!G
#ederal, State, .ounty or munici!al governments can be sued in their cor!orate ca!acity when functioning as
federal debt collectors under the #air Debt .ollection Practices )ct ?#D.P)@. *f the #ederal or State government can claim
immunity under the 66th )mendment, then the #ederal or State or .ounty or munici!al government cannot use +aw or
E0uity -urisdiction against the sovereign !eo!le in .ourt, since the !eo!le are not sub-ect to a ;foreign state< under itle 49
>S., 3udicial Procedure, TT65E4 ,656E. he States are made u! of ;State .iti/ens,< and under the 66th )mendment, ;State
.iti/ens< cannot be sued by a ;foreign state.<
)rticle *** section 4 and the 66th )mendment of the .onstitution are in conflict. he courts cannot convene under
)rticle *** e0uity -urisdiction and then have its !ublic officers claim 66th amendment immunity. he courts are o!erating in
a foreign state ca!acity against the !eo!le once the court officials ta"e their oath.
'rticle III Section 2
he -udicial !ower shall e&tend to all cases, in law and e0uity, arising under this .onstitution, the laws of the
>nited States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;Uto all cases affecting ambassadors, other
!ublic ministers and consuls;Uto all cases of admiralty and maritime -urisdiction;Uto controversies to which the >nited
States shall be a !arty;Uto controversies between two or more states;Ubetween a state and citizens of another state;U
between citi/ens of different states;Ubetween citi/ens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and
between a state, or the citi/ens thereof, and foreign states, citi/ens or sub-ects.
he ratification of the Eleventh )mendment on #ebruary 7, 67:8 effectively altered )rticle *** Section 4, and now
;'ll< !ublic offices are using the Eleventh )mendment as a defense against being sued, whereas, the Eleventh )mendment
actually removed !rotection since -udicial !ower no longer e&tended to any suit in +aw or E0uity, and subse0uently
afforded the !eo!le the same !rotection as any level of government. he !eo!le cannot be charged in +aw or E0uity claims
by anyone in the government. he court only has one action as revealed by the 'ules of .ivil ProcedureF ;'ule 4U$ne
form of )ction F here is only one form of action O the civil action.< .ivil action can be brought only by the !eo!le and not
by any level of government.
'mendment NI
he -udicial !ower of the >nited States shall not be construed to e$tend to any suit in la@ or e%uity,
commenced or !rosecuted against one of the >nited States by citi/ens of another state, or by citi/ens or
sub-ects of any foreign state.
Stripping Doctrine. he Constitution was amended again in 1868 to protect various civil rights, and Section 5 of
the 14th Amendment granted Congress the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of that amendment.
The courts have recognized that this new amendment, again a consensus of the people, abrogates the immunity provided by
the 11th Amendment. When Congress enacted legislation under the auspices of Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, they
specifically abrogated 11th Amendment immunity, and states can, under such federal statutes be prosecuted in federal court.
he 6978 .ivil 'ights )ct. he Su!reme .ourt ruled that this .ongressional enactment was unconstitutional. Civil
2ights 'cts ?6955, 697E, 6978, 6:87, 6:5E, 6:5D, 6:59@ >S legislation. he .ivil 'ights )ct ?6955@ gave )frican,
)mericans citi/enshi! and e&tended civil rights to all !ersons born in the >S) ?e&ce!t Hative )mericans@. he 697E )ct
Servus Servorum Dei
was !assed to re,enact the !revious measure, which was considered to be of dubious constitutionality. *n 699%, the >S
Su!reme .ourt declared unconstitutional the 697E law. he 6978 )ct was !assed to outlaw discrimination in !ublic !laces
because of race or !revious servitude. !he act @as declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court <1>>.8>3=" <>.S.
Su!reme .ourt .ivil 'ights .ases, 6E: >.S. % ?699%@ .ivil 'ights .ases Submitted $ctober erm, 6994 Decided $ctober
65th, 6999 6E: >.S. %= @hich stated that the 19th 'mendment" the constituti onal basis of the act" protected individual
rights against infringement by the states" not by other individuals. he 6:87 )ct established the .ivil 'ights
.ommission to investigate violations of the 68th )mendment. he 6:5E )ct enabled court,a!!ointed federal officials to
!rotect blac" voting rights. )n act of violence to obstruct a court order became a federal offense. he 6:5D )ct established
as law e0ual rights for all citi/ens in voting, education, !ublic accommodations and in federally,assisted !rograms. he
6:59 )ct guaranteed e0ual treatment in housing and real estate to all citi/ens.
Ho level of the E&ecutive or 3udicial government has ever introduced into any .ourt action a real !arty of interest
under 'ule 67. he .ourt has no -urisdiction under 64?b@ ?6@, ?4@, ?%@ over the Petitioner or !eo!le. +ecision and
2ationale4 he 9,6 decision of the .ourt was delivered by 3ustice 3ose!h P. Bradley, with 3ohn Marshall 1arlan of
Gentuc"y alone in dissent. he .ourt decided that the .ivil 'ights )ct of 6978 was unconstitutional. Heither the 6%th nor
the 6Dth amendment em!owers the .ongress to legislate in matters of racial discrimination in the !rivate sector, Bradley
wrote. ;he 6%th )mendment has res!ect, not to distinctions of racePbut to slavery.P< he 6Dth )mendment, he
continued, a!!lied to State, not !rivate, actions; furthermore, the abridgment of rights !resented in this case are to be
considered as ;ordinary civil in-uries< rather than the im!osition of badges of slavery.
Bradley commented that ;individual invasion of individual rights is not the sub-ect,matter of the 6D
th
)mendment. *t has a
dee!er and broader sco!e. It nullifies and ma;es void all state legislation" and state action of every ;ind" @hich impairs
the privileges and immunities of citiLens of the #nited States" or @hich inCures them in life" liberty or property
@ithout due process of la@" or @hich denies to any of them the e%ual protection of the la@s.A !herefore" the Court
limited the impact of the ,%ual Protection Clause of the 19th 'mendment.
&'CI O- S#*J,C! ('!!,2 J#2IS+IC!IO)
*n a court of limited -urisdiction, whenever a !arty denies that the court has sub-ect,matter -urisdiction, it becomes
the duty and the burden of the !arty claiming that the court has sub-ect matter -urisdiction to !rovide evidence from the
record of the case that the court holds sub-ect,matter -urisdiction. 0indell v City of Harvey, 464 *ll.)!!.%d 6ED4, 876 H.E.4d
6E67 ?6st Dist. 6::6@ ?=the burden of !roving -urisdiction rests u!on the !arty asserting it.=@. >ntil the !laintiff submits
uncontroversial evidence of sub-ect,matter -urisdiction to the court that the court has sub-ect,matter -urisdiction, the court is
!roceeding without sub-ect,matter -urisdiction. /oos v A(erian .nergy Savers, In., 659 *ll.)!!.%d 889, 844 H.E.4d
9D6?6:99@?=Where -urisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests u!on the !laintiff.=@. he law !laces the duty
and burden of sub-ect,matter -urisdiction u!on the !laintiff. Should the court attem!t to !lace the burden u!on the
defendant, the court has acted against the law, violates the defendantNs due !rocess rights, and the -udge under court
decisions has immediately lost sub-ect,matter -urisdiction. *n a court of limited -urisdiction, the court must !roceed e&actly
according to the law or statute under which it o!erates. *la#e v ,ret)el, %96 *ll. D:9, D5 H.E.4d %78 ?6:D%@ ?=the actions,
being statutory !roceedings, ...were void for want of !ower to ma"e them.=@ ?=he -udgments were based on orders which
were void because the court e&ceeded its -urisdiction in entering them. Where a court, after ac0uiring -urisdiction of a
sub-ect matter, as here, transcends the limits of the -urisdiction conferred, its -udgment is void.=@; Ar(strong v Ob!ino, %EE
*ll. 6DE, 6D%, 6%% H.E. 89 ?6:46@ ?=he doctrine that where a court has once ac0uired -urisdiction it has a right to decide
every 0uestion which arises in the cause, and its -udgment or decree, however erroneous, cannot be collaterally assailed, is
only correct when the court !roceeds according to the established modes governing the class to which the case belongs and
does not transcend in the e&tent and character of its -udgment or decree the law or statute which is a!!licable to it.= In
Interest of 1.2., 499 *ll.)!!.%d %EE, 596 H.E.4d 8%4 ?6st Dist. 6::7@ ?=Where a courtNs !ower to act is controlled by statute,
the court is governed by the rules of limited -urisdiction, and courts e&ercising -urisdiction over such matters must !roceed
within the strictures of the statute.=@; In re 1arriage of 1illi#en, 6:: *ll.)!!.%d 96%, 887 H.E.4d 8:6 ?6st Dist. 6::E@ ?=he
Servus Servorum Dei
-urisdiction of a court in a dissolution !roceeding is limited to that conferred by statute.=@; 2!lan 1aterials Co. v. 0ee
Const. Co., In., 6E6 *ll.)!!.%d %E, DE, D47 H.E.4d 7:7 ?6st Dist. 6:96@ ?=hough a court be one of general -urisdiction,
when its !ower to act on a !articular matter is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited
-urisdiction.=@. =here is no discretion to ignore that lac" of -urisdiction.= 3oye v. "S, D7D #4d 468. =) universal !rinci!le
as old as the law is that a !roceedings of a court without -urisdiction are a nullity and its -udgment therein without effect
either on !erson or !ro!erty.= Nor&ood v. +enfield, %D . %4:; .x parte Gia(bonini, D: P. 7%4. =3urisdiction is fundamental
and a -udgment rendered by a court that does not have -urisdiction to hear is void ab initio.= *n 'e )!!lication of Wyatt, %EE
P. 6%4; 'e .avitt, 669 P4d 9D5. =hus, where a -udicial tribunal has no -urisdiction of the sub-ect matter on which it
assumes to act, its !roceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term.= Dillon v. Dillon, 697 P 47. =) court has
no -urisdiction to determine its own -urisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its !ower to act, and a court
must have the authority to decide that 0uestion in the first instance.= +es!e Ar(y v. 1!niipal Co!rt of /os Angeles, 676
P4d 9; %%6 >S 8D:, :6 +. ed. 6555, 57 S..t. 6DE:. =) de!arture by a court from those recogni/ed and established
re0uirements of law, however close a!!arent adherence to mere form in method of !rocedure, which has the effect of
de!riving one of a constitutional right, is an e&cess of -urisdiction.= W!est v. W!est, 647 P4d :%D, :%7. =Where a court
failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due !rocess of law, court is de!rived of -uris.= 1erritt v. H!nter, ..).
Gansas 67E #4d 7%:. =the fact that the !etitioner was released on a !romise to a!!ear before a magistrate for an
arraignment, that fact is circumstance to be considered in determining whether in first instance there was a !robable cause
for the arrest.= 1onroe v. ,apa, D., *ll. 6:5%, 446 # Su!! 598. ;3urisdiction, once challenged, is to be !roven, not by the
court, but by the !arty attem!ting to assert -urisdiction. he burden of !roof of -urisdiction lies with the asserter.< See
1N!tt v. G1AC, 4:9 >S 679. he origins of this doctrine of law may be found in 1axfield4s /essee v. /evy, D >S %E9. =)
court has no -urisdiction to determine its own -urisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its !ower to act,
and a court must have the authority to decide that 0uestion in the first instance.= +es!e Ar(y v. 1!niipal Co!rt of /os
Angeles, 676 P4d 9; %%6 >S 8D:, :6 +. ed. 6555, 57 S..t. 6DE:. =$nce -urisdiction is challenged, the court cannot !roceed
when it clearly a!!ears that the court lac"s -urisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss
the action.= 1elo v. "S, 8E8 #4d 6E45. =he law !rovides that once State and #ederal -urisdiction has been challenged, it
must be !roven.= ,,1ain v. T$ibo!tot, 6EE S. .t. 48E4 ?6:9E@. =$nce -urisdiction is challenged, it must be !roven.=
,,Hagens v. /avine, D68 >.S. 8%%. =Where there is absence of -urisdiction, all administrative and -udicial !roceedings are a
nullity and confer no right, offer no !rotection, and afford no -ustification, and may be re-ected u!on direct collateral
attac".= ,,T$o(pson v. Tol(ie, 4 Pet. 687, 7 +.Ed. %96; Griffit$ v. *ra)ier, 9 .r. :, %+. Ed. D76.
=Ho sanctions can be im!osed absent !roof of -urisdiction.= ,,Standard v. Olsen, 7D S. .t. 759; itle 8 >.S..., Sec. 885 and
889 ?b@.
=he !ro!onent of the rule has the burden of !roof.= ,,itle 8 >.S..., Sec. 885 ?d@. =3urisdiction can be challenged at any
time, even on final determination.= ,,0asso v. "ta$ ,o&er 5 /ig$t Co., D:8 4nd :E5 at :6E. ;Mere good faith assertions of
!ower and authority ?-urisdiction@ have been abolished.< 66O&ens v. T$e City of Independene, =) de!arture by a court from
those recogni/ed and established re0uirements of law, however close a!!arent adherence to mere form in method of
!rocedure, which has the effect of de!riving one of a constitutional right, is an e&cess of -urisdiction.= ,,W!est v. W!est, 647
P4d :%D, :%7. ;*n a court of limited -urisdiction, whenever a !arty denies that the court has sub-ect,matter -urisdiction, it
becomes the duty and the burden of the !arty claiming that the court has sub-ect matter -urisdiction to !rovide evidence
from the record of the case that the court holds sub-ect,matter -urisdiction.< ,,0indell v City of Harvey, 464 *ll.)!!.%d 6ED4,
876 H.E.4d 6E67 ?6st Dist. 6::6@ ?=the burden of !roving -urisdiction rests u!on the !arty asserting it.=@. ;>ntil the !laintiff
submits uncontroversial evidence of sub-ect,matter -urisdiction to the court that the court has sub-ect,matter -urisdiction, the
court is !roceeding without sub-ect,matter -urisdiction.<,,/oos v A(erian .nergy Savers, In., 659 *ll.)!!.%d 889, 844
H.E.4d 9D6?6:99@?=Where -urisdiction is contested, the burden of establishing it rests u!on the !laintiff.=@. he law !laces
the duty and burden of sub-ect,matter -urisdiction u!on the !laintiff. Should the court attem!t to !lace the burden u!on the
defendant, the court has acted against the law, violates the defendantNs due !rocess rights, and the -udge under court
decisions has immediately lost sub-ect,matter -urisdiction. *n a court of limited -urisdiction, the court must !roceed e&actly
according to the law or statute under which it o!erates. ,,*la#e v ,ret)el, %96 *ll. D:9, D5 H.E.4d %78 ?6:D%@ ?=the actions,
being statutory !roceedings, ...were void for want of !ower to ma"e them.=@ ?=he -udgments were based on orders which
Servus Servorum Dei
were void because the court e&ceeded its -urisdiction in entering them. Where a court, after ac0uiring -urisdiction of a
sub-ect matter, as here, transcends the limits of the -urisdiction conferred, its -udgment is void.=@; Ar(strong v Ob!ino, %EE
*ll. 6DE, 6D%, 6%% H.E. 89 ?6:46@ =he doctrine that where a court has once ac0uired -urisdiction it has a right to decide
every 0uestion which arises in the cause, and its -udgment or decree, however erroneous, cannot be collaterally assailed, is
only correct when the court !roceeds according to the established modes governing the class to which the case belongs and
does not transcend in the e&tent and character of its -udgment or decree the law or statute which is a!!licable to it.= In
Interest of 1.2., 499 *ll.)!!.%d %EE, 596 H.E.4d 8%4 ?6st Dist. 6::7@ ?=Where a courtNs !ower to act is controlled by statute,
the court is governed by the rules of limited -urisdiction, and courts e&ercising -urisdiction over such matters must !roceed
within the strictures of the statute.=@; In re 1arriage of 1illi#en, 6:: *ll.)!!.%d 96%, 887 H.E.4d 8:6 ?6st Dist. 6::E@ ?=he
-urisdiction of a court in a dissolution !roceeding is limited to that conferred by statute.=@; 2!lan 1aterials Co. v. 0ee
Const. Co., In., 6E6 *ll.)!!.%d %E, DE, D47 H.E.4d 7:7 ?6st Dist. 6:96@ ?=hough a court be one of general -urisdiction,
when its !ower to act on a !articular matter is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the rules of limited
-urisdiction.=@.
&'CI O- J#+ICI'& I((#)I!G
hus, neither 3udges nor 2overnment attorneys are above the law. See "nited States v. Isaas, D:% #. 4d 664D,
66D% ?7th .ir. 6:7D@. *n our -udicial system, few more serious threats to individual liberty can be imagined than a corru!t
-udge or -udges acting in collusion outside of their -udicial authority with the E&ecutive Branch to de!rive a citi/en of his
rights. *n T$e Case of t$e 1ars$alsea, 77 Eng. 'e!. 6E47 ?G.B. 656%@, Sir Edward .o"e found that )rticle %: of the Magna
.arta restricted the !ower of -udges to act outside of their -urisdiction such !roceedings would be void, and actionable.
When a .ourt has ?a@ -urisdiction of the cause, and !roceeds inverso ordine or erroneously, there the !arty who sues, or the
officer or minister of the .ourt who e&ecutes the !rece!t or !rocess of the .ourt, no action lies against them. But ?b@ when
the .ourt has not -urisdiction of the cause, there the whole !roceeding is before a !erson who is not a -udge, and actions will
lie against them without any regard of the !rece!t or !rocess . . . *d. 77 Eng. 'e!. at 6E%9,D6.
) ma-ority of states, including Qirginia ?see, Qa. .ode T9.E6,6:8.%?%@@, followed the English rule to find that a
-udge had no immunity from suit for acts outside of his -udicial ca!acity or -urisdiction. 'obert .raig Waters, N+iability of
3udicial $fficers under Section 6:9%N 7: Lale +. 3. ?December 6:5:@, !!. %45,47 and 4:,%E@.
)lso as early as 69E5, in the >nited States there were recogni/ed restrictions on the !ower of -udges, as well as the !lacing
of liability on -udges for acts outside of their -urisdiction. *n Wise v. Wit$ers, 7 >.S. ?% .ranch@ %%6 ?69E5@, the Su!reme
.ourt confirmed the right to sue a -udge for e&ercising authority beyond the -urisdiction authori/ed by statute.
*n St!(p v. Spar#(an, D%8 >.S. %D: at %5E ?6:79@, the Su!reme .ourt confirmed that a -udge would be immune from suit
only if he did not act outside of his -udicial ca!acity andCor was not !erforming any act e&!ressly !rohibited by statute. See
Bloc", St!(p v Spar#(an and the 1istory of 3udicial *mmunity, D:9E Du"e +.3. 97: ?l:9E@. he .ircuit .ourt overturned
this case and the -udge was liable.
3udicial immunity may only e&tend to all -udicial acts within the courtKs -urisdiction and -udicial ca!acity, but it does not
e&tend to either criminal acts, or acts outside of official ca!acity or in the Nclear absence of all -urisdiction.N see St!(p v.
Spar#(an D%8 >.S. %D: ?6:79@. ;When a -udge "nows that he lac"s -urisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid
.onstitutional !rovisions or valid statutes e&!ressly de!riving him of -urisdiction or -udicial ca!acity, -udicial immunity is
lost.< ,,+an#in v. Ho&ard 5%% #.4d 9DD ?6:9E@, Den 7eller v. +an#in, 6E6 S. .t. 4E4E ?6:96@.
)s stated by the >nited States Su!reme .ourt in ,iper v. ,earson, 4 2ray 64E, cited in 0radley v. *is$er, 6% Wall. %%8, 4E
+. Ed. 5D5 ?6974@, Nwhere there is no -urisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident to -urisdiction.N he
constitutional re0uirement of due !rocess of the law is indis!ensableF =Ho !erson shall be held to answer for a ca!ital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a !resentment or indictment of a 2rand 3ury, e&ce!t in cases arising in the land or
naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or !ublic danger; nor shall any !erson be sub-ect for the
Servus Servorum Dei
same offense to be twice !ut in -eo!ardy of life or limb; nor shall be com!elled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself" nor be deprived of life" liberty or property" @ithout due process of la@ nor shall !rivate !ro!erty be ta"en for
!ublic use without -ust com!ensation.= )rticle Q, Hational .onstitution. ;) -udgment can be void . . . where the court acts
in a manner contrary to due !rocess.< ,,)m 3ur 4d, T4: Qoid 3udgments, !. DED. =Where a court failed to observe
safeguards, it amounts to denial of due !rocess of law, court is de!rived of -uris.= ,,1erritt v. H!nter, ..). Gansas 67E #4d
7%:. ;Moreover, all !roceedings founded on the void -udgment are themselves regarded as invalid.< ,,Olson v. /eit$ 76
Wyo. %65, 487 P.4d %D4. ;*n criminal cases, certain constitutional errors re0uire automatic reversal,< see State v.
S$(it, 47% Minn. 79, 99, 6%: H.W.4d 9EE, 9E7 ?6:55@.
P,2SO) vs P,OP&,
=his word J!ersonK and its sco!e and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also a!!arently natural
beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to gras!, at whatever cost, a true and !ro!er understanding
to the word in all the !hases of its !ro!er use . . . ) !erson is here not a !hysical or individual !erson, but the status or
condition with which he is invested . . . not an individual or !hysical !erson, but the status, condition or character borne by
!hysical !ersons . . . he law of !ersons is the law of status or condition.= ,, )merican +aw and Procedure, Qol. 6%, !age
6%7, 6:6E.
he following case citation declares the undis!uted distinction in fact and at law of the distinction between the term
;!ersons,< which is the !lural form of the term ;!erson,< and the word ;Peo!le< which is H$ the !lural form of the term
;!erson.< he above, mentioned ;real !arty in interest< is H$ a subordinate ;!erson,< ;sub-ect,< or ;agent,< but is a
;constituent,< in whom sovereignty abides, a member of the ;Posterity of We, the Peo!le,< in whom sovereignty resides,
and from whom the government has emanatedF =he sovereignty of a state does not reside in the persons who fill the
different de!artments of its government, but in the People, from whom the government emanated; and they may change it at
their discretion. Sovereignty, then in this country, abides with the constituency, and not with the agent; and this remar" is
true, both in reference to the federal and state government.= ?Persons are not Peo!le@.,,Spooner v. 1Connell, 44 # :%:,
:D%F =$ur government is founded u!on com!act. Sovereignty was, and is, in the !eo!le= 66Glass v. Sloop 0etsey, su!reme
.ourt, 67:D. =Peo!le of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belong to the Ging, by his !rerogative.= ,,su!reme
.ourt, /ansing v. S(it$, 694:. ;he >nited States, as a whole, emanates from the !eo!le ... he !eo!le, in their ca!acity as
sovereigns, made and ado!ted the .onstitution ...= ,,su!reme .ourt, D Wheat DE4. =he governments are but trustees acting
under derived authority and have no !ower to delegate what is not delegated to them. But the !eo!le, as the original
fountain might ta"e away what they have delegated and entrust to whom they !lease. ... he sovereignty in every state
resides in the !eo!le of the state and they may alter and change their form of government at their own !leasure.= 66/!t$er v.
0orden, D9 >S 6, 64 +.Ed 896. =While sovereign !owers are delegated to ... the government, sovereignty itself remains with
the !eo!le< ,,8i# Wo v. Hop#ins, 669 >.S. %85, !age %7E. =here is no such thing as a !ower of inherent sovereignty in the
government of the >nited States .... *n this country sovereignty resides in the !eo!le, and .ongress can e&ercise no !ower
which they have not, by their .onstitution entrusted to itF )ll else is withheld.= ,, 3!lliard v. Green(an, 66E >.S. D46. =*n
common usage, the term N!ersonN does not include the sovereign, and statutes em!loying the word are ordinarily construed to
e&clude it.= ,, Wilson v. O(a$a Indian Tribe DD4 >S 58%, 557 ?6:7:@. =Since in common usage the term J!ersonK does not
include the sovereign, statutes em!loying that term are ordinarily construed to e&clude it.= ,, ".S. v. Cooper, %64 >S
5EE,5ED, 56 S. .t 7D4 ?6:D6@. =*n common usage, the term J!ersonK does not include the sovereign and statutes em!loying it
will ordinarily not be construed to do so.= ,, ".S. v. "nited 1ine Wor#ers of A(eria, %%E >.S. 489, 57 S. .t 577 ?6:D7@.
=Since in common usage, the term J!ersonK does not include the sovereign, statutes em!loying the !hrase are ordinarily
construed to e&clude it.= ,, "S v. *ox :D >S %68. =*n common usage the word J!ersonK does not include the sovereign, and
statutes em!loying the word are generally construed to e&clude the sovereign.= ,, ".S. v. General 1otors Corporation, D...
*ll, 4 #.'.D. 849, 8%EF
he following two case citations declare the undis!uted doctrine, in fact and at law, that the word ?term of art@
;!erson< is a ;general word,< and that the ;!eo!le,< of whom the above,mentioned ;real !arty in interest< is one, ;are H$
Servus Servorum Dei
bound by general words in statutes.< herefore, statutes do not a!!ly to, o!erate u!on or affect the above,mentioned ;real
!arty in interestF< =!he @ord OpersonD in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its
sco!e a variety of entities other than human beings., ,,C$!r$ of Sientology v. "S Depart(ent of 3!stie 564 #4d D67, D48
?6:7:@. =!he people" or sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes , restrictive of !rerogative right, title or
interest, unless e&!ressly named. )cts of limitation do not bind the Ging or the !eo!le. he !eo!le have been ceded all the
rights of the Ging, the former sovereign ... *t is a ma&im of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good
and to !revent in-ury, the Ging shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and !rerogative right would
be divested or ta"en from the Ging ?or the Peo!le@ he shall not be bound.= ,, T$e ,eople v. Her#i(er, D .owen ?HL@ %D8,
%D9 ?6948@F =*n the >nited States, sovereignty resides in !eo!le.< ,,,erry v. ".S. ?4:D >S %%E@. =) Sovereign is e&em!t
from suit, not because of any formal conce!tion or obsolete theory, but on the logical and !ractical ground that there can be
no legal 'ight as against the authority that ma"es the law on which the 'ight de!ends.= ,,9a&anana#oa v. ,olyblan#, 4E8
>.S. %D:, %8%, 47 S. .t. 845, 847, 86 +. Ed. 9%D ?6:E7@.
+,& CO+, !I!&, > Chapters H K H174 +ela@are Code : Section H174 CO2PO2'!, )'(,
he cor!orate name of a cor!oration organi/ed under this cha!ter shall contain either a word or words descri!tive of the
!rofessional service to be rendered by the cor!oration or shall contain the last names of 6 or more of its !resent,
!ros!ective or former shareholders or of !ersons who were associated with a !redecessor !erson, !artnershi!, cor!oration or
other organi/ation or whose name or names a!!eared in the name of such !redecessor organi/ation.
!e$as 'dministrative Code
Sub-ectF 6 ). T 7:.%6 .$'P$')*$HS ?EH*L H)MES@
T 7:.%6. .haracters of Print )cce!table in Hames
?a@ Entity names may consist of letters of the 'oman al!habet, )rabic numerals, and certain symbols ca!able of being
re!roduced on a standard English language ty!ewriter, or combination thereof.
?b@ Only upper case or capitol letters" @ith no distinction as to type face or font" @ill be recogniLed.
Delaware legislation March 6E 69::
;)n )ct Providing 2eneral .or!orate +aw< his )ct allow the cor!oration to become a ;PE'S$H<
) legal person, also called Curidical person or Curistic person,
A6B
is a legal entity through which the law allows a grou! of
natural persons to act as if they were a single com!osite individual for certain !ur!oses, or in some -urisdictions, for a
single !erson to have a se!arate legal !ersonality other than their own.A4BA%B his legal fiction does not mean these entities
are human beings, but rather means that the law allows them to act as persons for certain limited !ur!oses. S')!'
C&'2' CO#)!G v. SO#!1,2) P'C. 2. CO." 11> #.S. .59" Hew Lor" .entral '. .o. v. >nited States, 464 >.S. D96
?6:E:@, >nited States v. Dotterweich, %4E >.S. 477 ?6:D%@

=Street )ame = FB+).GNS +)W D*.*$H)'L )B'*D2ED #*#1 ED**$H
=Securities held in the name of a bro"er instead of his customerNs name are said to be carried in a =street name=. his occurs when the
securities have been bought on margin or when the customer wishes the security to be held by the bro"er. he name of a bro"er or ban"
a!!earing on a cor!orate security with blan" endorsement by the bro"er or ban". he security can then be transferred merely by delivery
since the endorsement is well "nown. Street name is used for convenience or to shield identity of the true owner.=
C#SIP +efinition4
.>S*PY *s a registered trademar" of the )merican Ban"ers )ssociation F )cronym .>S*P refers to the .ommittee on >niform Security
*dentification Procedures. he acronym .>S*P ty!ically refers to both the .ommittee on >niform Security *dentification Procedures and
the :,character al!hanumeric security identifiers that they distribute for all Horth )merican securities for the !ur!oses of facilitating
clearing and settlement...
#irst 5 .haracters identify the uni0ue name of theF
, .om!any
, Munici!ality
, 2overnment agency
) hierarchical al!ha numeric convention lin"ed to al!habetic issuer name.
He&t 4 .haracters *dentifies the ty!e of instrumentF
, E0uity
, Debt
Z >ni0uely identifies the issue within the issuer
Servus Servorum Dei
Z ) hierarchical al!ha numeric convention
He&t 6 .haracter
Z ) mathematical formula chec"s accuracy of the !revious 9 characters Z Delivers a 6 character chec" result
'esulting : .haracters
Z ) uni0ue identifier
P C#SIPQ : #niversally recogniLed identifier for financial instruments.
P CI)S : C#SIP International )umbering System
P CS* ISI) :Participation in the assignment of C#SIP:based International Securities Identification
)umbers
CI)S
.>S*P *nternational Humbering System ?.*HS@ is a :,character al!hanumeric identifier that em!loys the same numbering system as
.>S*P, but also contains a letter of the al!habet in the first !osition signifying the issuerNs country or geogra!hic region. .*HS was
develo!ed in 6:9: as an e&tension to .>S*P in res!onse to >.S. demand for global coverage, and is the local identifier of more than %E
non,Horth )merican mar"ets.
CS* ISI)
he *nternational Securities *dentification Humber ?*S*H@ is a uni0ue global code that identifies instruments in different countries to
facilitate cross,border trading. .SB is res!onsible for the assignment of *S*Hs in the >.S. and in other areas where designated or
a!!ointed. .SB *S*Hs are 64 character identifiers that have a .>S*P or .*HS embedded in them, which always a!!ear in !osition % to 66.
.SB has agents in countries such as .anada, Bermuda, he .ayman *slands and 3amaica, and is also the re!resentative agency for
countries in South )merica. Because of this, it was necessary to develo! a se!arate identification system to designate .SB,assigned
securities from these -urisdictions.
!he 'merican *an;ers 'ssociation4
he )merican Ban"ers )ssociation ?)B)@ is a free,trade and !rofessional association that !romotes and advocates issues im!ortant to the
ban"ing industry in the >nited States. he )B)Ns national head0uarters are in Washington, D... *n addition to its trade association
mission, the )B) also !erforms educational com!onents for consumers through its Educational #oundation affiliate.
OrganiLation4
While the )B) wor"s on a national level, it also is su!!orted by state o!erated offices ?sometimes referred to as ;+eagues<@ which focus
attention on state level su!!ort. Both the )B) and the state organi/ations are dues su!!orted trade associations. Both the state and
national offices also o!erate Political )ction .ommittees ?P).s@ which use registered lobbyists to wor" for laws that are advantageous
for the ban"ing industry. he !resident of the )B) is Edward Lingling.
Political action committee
*n the >nited States, a Political )ction .ommittee, or P)., is the name commonly given to a !rivate grou!, regardless of si/e, organi/ed
to elect !olitical candidates. +egally, what constitutes a =P).= for !ur!oses of regulation is a matter of state and federal law. >nder the
#ederal Election .am!aign )ct, an organi/ation becomes a =!olitical committee= by receiving contributions or ma"ing e&!enditures in
e&cess of [6,EEE for the !ur!ose of influencing a federal election.
When an interest grou! gets directly involved within the !olitical !rocess, a P). is created. hese P).s receive and raise money from the
s!ecial grou!Ns constituents, and on behalf of the s!ecial interest, ma"es donations to !olitical cam!aigns.
!he 'merican -ederation of State" County and (unicipal ,mployees <'-SC(,= is the second, or third,largest labor union in the
>nited States and one of the fastest,growing, re!resenting over 6.D million em!loyees, !rimarily in local and state government and in the
health care industry. )#S.ME is !art of the )#+,.*$, one of the two main labor federations in the >nited States. Em!loyees at the
federal government level are !rimarily re!resented by other unions, such as the )merican #ederation of 2overnment Em!loyees, with
which )#S.ME was once affiliated, and the Hational reasury Em!loyees >nion; but )#S.ME does re!resent some federal em!loyees
at the #ederal )viation )dministration and the +ibrary of .ongress, among others.A6B
)ccording to their website, )#S.ME organi/es for social and economic -ustice in the wor"!lace and through !olitical action and
legislative advocacy. *t is divided into more than %,8EE local unions in D5 >.S. states, !lus the District of .olumbia and Puerto 'ico. Each
local union writes its own constitution, holds membershi! meetings, and elects its own officers. .ouncils are also a !art of )#S.MENs
administrative structure, usually grou!ing together various locals in a geogra!hic area.
)ccording to $!enSecrets.org, the to! contributors since 6:99 ran"ed by their total s!ending along with the !arty tilt of their
contributions areF
2an; OrganiLation !otal +em R 2epub R !ilt
6 )#S.ME [%:,:D7,9D% :9\ 6\ Solidly Dem ?over :E\@

!'*&, O- +,-I)I!IO)S
-oreign Court he courts of a foreign state or nation. *n the >nited States, this term is fre0uently a!!lied to the courts of one of the
States when their -udgment or records are introduced in the courts of another.
-oreign Curisdiction )ny -urisdiction foreign to that of the forum; e.g., a sister state or another country. )lso, the e&ercise by a state or
nation -urisdiction beyond its own territory. +ong,arm service of !rocess is a form of such foreign or e&traterritorial -urisdiction
Servus Servorum Dei
-oreign la@s he laws of a foreign country, or of a sister state. *n conflicts of law, the legal !rinci!les of -uris!rudence which are !art of
the law of a sister state or nation. #oreign laws are additions to our own laws, and in that res!ect are called ;%!s reept!(.<
-oreign corporation ) cor!oration doing business in one State though chartered or incor!orated in another state is a foreign cor!oration
as to the first state, and, as such, is re0uired to consent to certain conditions and restrictions in order to do business in such first state.
>nder federal ta& laws, a foreign cor!oration is one which is not organi/ed under the law of one of the States or erritories of the >nited
States. *.'... T 77E6 ?a@ ?8@. Service of !rocess on foreign cor!oration is governed by the #ed. '. .iv. P. D See also .or!oration.
-oreign service of process Service of !rocess for the ac0uisition of -urisdiction by a court in the >nited States u!on a !erson in a foreign
country is !rescribed by #ed '. .iv. P. D ?i@ and 49 >.S...). T 65E9. Service of !rocess on foreign cor!orations is governed by #ed. '.
.iv. P. D?d@ ?%@.
-oreign states Hations which are outside the >nited States. erm may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state.
-oreign immunity With res!ect to -urisdictional immunity of foreign states, see 49 >S., Sec. T65E4 et se'. itle 9 >S., .ha!ter 64,
Subcha!ter *, Sec. T66E6?6D@ he term ;foreign state< includes outlying !ossessions of a foreign state, but self,governing dominions or
territories under mandate or trusteeshi! shall be regarded as se!arate foreign states.
Profiteering a"ing advantage of unusual or e&ce!tional circumstance to ma"e e&cessive !rofit; e.g. selling of scarce or essential goods
at inflated !rice during time of emergency or war.
Person *n general usage, a human being ?i.e. natural !erson@ though by statute the term may include a firm, labor organi/ations,
!artnershi!s, associations, cor!orations, legal re!resentative, trusts, trustees in ban"ru!tcy, or receivers. Hational +abor 'elations )ct,
T4?6@.
+efinition of the term BpersonA under itle 45, Subtitle #, .ha!ter 78, Subcha!ter D, Sec. Sec. T7%D%
he term ;!erson< as used in this cha!ter includes an officer or em!loyee of a cor!oration, or a member or em!loyee of a !artnershi!,
who as such officer, em!loyee or member is under a duty to !erform the act in res!ect of which the violation occurs. ) corporation is a
<!erson< within the meaning of e0ual !rotection and due !rocess !rovisions of the >nited States .onstitution.
!ertius interveniens ) third !arty intervening; a third !arty who comes between the !arties to a suit; one who inter!leads. 2ilbertNs
#orum 'omanum. D7.
Erit of error Cora( nobis ) common,law writ, the !ur!ose of which is to correct a -udgment in the same court in which it was rendered,
on the ground of error of fact, for which statutes !rovide no other remedy, which fact did not a!!ear of record, or was un"nown to the
court when -udgment was !ronounced, and which, if "nown would have !revented the -udgment, and which was un"nown, and could of
reasonable diligence in time to have been otherwise !resented to the court, unless he was !revented from so !resenting them by duress,
fear, or other sufficient cause. =) writ of error )oram nobis is a common,law writ of ancient origin devised by the -udiciary, which
constitutes a remedy for setting aside a -udgment which for a valid reason should never have been rendered.= 4D ..3.S., .riminal +aw. T
656E ?4EED@.;he !rinci!al function of the @rit of error )oram nobis is to afford to the court in which an action was tried an o!!ortunity
to correct its own record with reference to a vital fact not "nown when the -udgment was rendered, and which could not have been
!resented by a motion for a new trial, a!!eal or other e&isting statutory !roceeding.< Blac"Ns +aw Dictionary., %rd ed., !. 6956; 4D ..3.S.,
.riminal +aw, T 65E5 b., !. 6D8; *ord v. Co((on&ealt$, %64 Gy. 769, 44: S.W.4d D7E.)t common law in England, it issued from the
.ourt of Gings Bench to a -udgment of that court. *ts !rinci!al aim is to afford the court in which an action was tried an o!!ortunity to
correct its own record with reference to a vital fact not "nown when the -udgment was rendered. *t is also said that at common law it lay
to correct !urely ministerial errors of the officers of the court. #urthermore, the above,mentioned ;real !arty in interest< demands
the strict adherence to )rticle *Q, section one of the Hational .onstitution so that in all matters before this court, the #ull #aith and .redit
shall be given in each State to the !ublic )cts, 'ecords, and -udicial Proceedings of every other State; and to )rticle *Q of the )rticles of
.onfederation, still in force !ursuant to )rticle Q* of the Hational .onstitution, so that ;#ull faith and credit shall be given in each of
these States to the records, acts, and -udicial !roceedings of the courts and magistrates of every other State,= selective incor!oration
notwithstanding. he lex do(iilii shall also de!end u!on the Hatural Domicile of the above,mentioned ;real !arty in interest.< he lex
do(iilii, involves the =law of the domicile= in the .onflict of +aws. .onflict is the branch of !ublic law regulating all lawsuits involving
a =foreign= law element where a difference in result will occur de!ending on which laws are a!!lied.
)MEHD)$'L 'E.$HS'>.*$H ). $# M)'.1 66, 6959
)n )ct to amend the act !assed March 4%, 6957, entitled =)n )ct su!!lementary to N)n act to !rovide for the more
efficient government of the rebel states,N !assed March 4, 6957, and to facilitate their restoration. S>PP+EMEH)'L
'E.$HS'>.*$H ). $# #$'*E1 .$H2'ESS. )n )ct su!!lementary to an act entitled =)n act to !rovide for
the more efficient government of the rebel states,= !assed March second, eighteen hundred and si&ty,seven, and to facilitate
restoration. = his act created the 6Dth amendment federal citi/en under section % of the federal constitution. )ll who hold
!ublic office fall under this section as >H*ED S)ES citi/ens. hose who hold office have "nowingly and willingly
given u! their citi/enshi! to this country under itle 9 Section T6D96 to become a foreign state agent under 44 >S.. he
oath of office to the constitution re0uires office,holders to u!hold and maintain our .onstitutional form of government
under the !eo!leKs authority. his right was never surrendered by the !eo!le; failure to do so violates 6E >S. T%%% and 69
>S. T6:69, cha!ter 668 T4%94, T4%9%, T68E8, T6EE6, T4D6, T4D4, D4 >S. T6:96 X %6 >S. T%74: -ust to name a few.
he #ederal Debt .ollection Procedure !laces all courts under e0uity and commerce and under the *nternational Monetary
#und. he *nternational Monetary #und comes under the >niform .ommercial .ode under ban"ing and business interest
and rust laws. his ma"es the .ourt C 3udges trustee over the trust and res!onsible whether or not the Petitioner
Servus Servorum Dei
understands the trust issue.
!he 15.. ban;ruptcy act placed all public officials in a fiduciary position to ;eep the accounts in
balance via discharge of the debt against the pre:paid" priority e$empt accounts of the 'merican
people.
!he 'merican people @ere fraudulently identified as enemy combatants under the !E,' for the
!ur!ose of s"irting the >H*ED S)ESN debtor obligation to the sovereign !eo!le of )merica and
facilitating the !illage and !lunder of the sovereign !eo!le under the direction of the international
ban"ing families.
he WE) sus!ended the >.S. .onstitution in the court room, turning the courtrooms into debt
collection facilities under admiraltyCmaritime and therefore, the standard )merican flag in the
courtroom was re!laced with a military )dmiralty flag for dealing with alien enemy combatants. he
!eo!le never rescinded their nationality to the real united States of )merica. hose who hold !ublic
office rescinded their nationality to become a foreign agent in order to hold !ublic office. *nternational
law re0uires the -udge to u!hold the !eo!leKs .onstitutional form of government as defined in the
;#ederalist Pa!ers<.
#ederal 'ules of .ivil Procedure C 'ules of .ivil Procedure 'ule 4 only allows civil action, and under
'ule 67, a real !arty of interest has to be !resent in the courtroom in order for there to be any claims of
in-ury or damages against ;the !eo!le.< )ny charges under the ;>H*ED S)ES< or ;1E S)E
$#PP..< fall under the WE) Section 4%. he !eo!le are not sub-ect to this -urisdiction as it is a
#oreign State -urisdiction. he !eo!le hold 66th amendment immunity to claims in e0uity and
commerce from a foreign state. he courts lac" -urisdiction over the !eo!le by .ongressional mandate.
'll debt of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S" e$cept that debt o@ed to the sovereign people of
'merica" has been abandoned and vacated and the #)I!,+ S!'!,S has +,C&'2,+ P,'C,
@ith the @orld and the sovereign people thereof" therefore" the gold fringed military flag
designating the admiraltyFmaritime Curisdiction shall be immediately removed from all
courtrooms" meeting rooms" etc. of the administrative agencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S and the
civil peace flag of the united states of 'merica shall be proudly displayed in their stead..
!he #.S. Courts @ho have been operating as debt collection facilities under !E,' and
the ,(,26,)CG E'2 POE,2S 'C! shall immediately ma;e the corrections and cure the
torts against the people" vacating all claims" attachments andFor restrictions on the private rights
of the sovereign people and ma;e them @hole.
!he courts" as @ell as all administrative agencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S" shall share
resources ma;ing room for and facilitating the establishment of the organic courts" operating
under the common la@" for the adCudication of all matters concerning the sovereign 'merican
people" other than the prosecution of grievances against an administrative agency for the trespass
of the private rights of the people. 'll administrative agencies shall actively participate in the
establishment of t@o distinctly separate systems" common la@ and administrative" operating side
by side for the benefit of the C2,+I!O2S" the sovereign people of 'merica.
'll administrative courts and agencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall operate in good faith
and honor as servants of the sovereign people of 'merica. Said administrative courts and
agencies have gro@n out of control" beyond the intent of the original founders and their
usefulness and shall begin to ma;e the corrections" a reversal" bringing about balance"
transparency" full disclosure and honor for the remedy of the 2eal Parties In Interest.
Servus Servorum Dei
'll debts of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S have been abandoned" e$cept the debt to the sovereign
people !he Pledge of the private property of the 'merican people has been relin%uished"
therefore" the administrative agencies of the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall ma;e the return of the
interest bac; to source" the sovereign people.
!he #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall immediately activate the established pass through account"
vacate the bloc;s on the asset accounts and ma;e the financial adCustments to discharge the debt
and return the accounts of the sovereign people bac; into balance. !he #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall
maintain the natural flo@ and balance in the accounts for the remedy of the people" returning the
interest bac; to source in the discharge of debt against the pre:paid account" at all times
remaining in honor.
!he #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall immediately ma;e the corrections as concerns the unla@ful
restrictions of the liberties of the sovereign people by the administrative agencies of the #)I!,+
S!'!,S
'll +eeds" @arranty deeds" trust deeds" sheriff deeds" ta$ deeds and all Certificates of !itle
are colorable titles issued to facilitate the DPledgeD of the private property of the sovereign people.
!he Pledge has been relin%uished" therefore" the #)I!,+ S!'!,S shall ma;e the corrections to
discharge all colorable titles" ma;e the re:conveyance and issue the land patentF allodial title for
the property bac; to the people.
It is the duty of the military to serve and protect the post" therefore" the #)I!,+ S!'!,S
military shall serve and protect the sovereign people of 'merica" the creditor of the #)I!,+
S!'!,S. 'll branches of the #.S. (ilitary shall follo@ the orders of the B!ransitional
CommitteeA" interim government and government of the republic" respectively throughout this
transition.
!he Provost (arshals are the organic police force @ith a duty to serve and protect the
sovereign. !he Provost (arshal shall immediately serve and protect all @ho claim protection
under this treaty ma;ing top priority anyFall re%uests for assistance on claims of unla@ful
restrictions on the liberties of a sovereign.
here shall be those members of the sovereign !eo!le, ambassadors, with a !assion to service,
who shall choose to serve the re!ublic; lightwor"ers, visionaries, warriors, teachers and !eo!le
"nowledgeable in the art of !eace and love; to serve as watchdogs or com!liance, ensuring the integrity
and !rotection of the !eo!leNs rights; or facilitators and educators charged with !resenting real truth,
that the enslavement of the sovereign !eo!le may never ha!!en again; beacons of light, guiding the
!eo!le out of the dar"ness, into the truth;
here shall be those members of the sovereign !eo!le who shall be instrumental in breathing
life into the civil government of the re!ublic, bringing em!owerment to the counties at large; in
interfacing with the administrative agents and agencies to com!el !erformance and com!liance, to
bring about balance and restore the natural flow of energy; to em!ower the civil government, the
!eo!le; to nurture and infuse this fledgling re!ublic with !eace, light and love; to rise above the fear; to
be the light;
hese members of the sovereign !eo!le, awa"ened into the truth, com!elled to service, may
a!!ly to accede hereto; u!on recei!t, acce!tance and registration of the a!!lication and Public
Declarations shall be em!owered as a Private Postmaster of a non,inde!endent !ostal /one, with all of
the rights, !ower and authority of a wholly sovereign nation, with the authority to seat civilian citi/en
Servus Servorum Dei
grand -uries; to em!ower -udges in the common law, 'angers and *ns!ectors with the !ower and
authority to com!el !erformance; to ma"e the corrections to bring com!liance and honor within the
administration.
he !ower shall reside with the !eo!le on the county. *t shall ta"e the agreement of no less than
three ?%@ !rivate !ostmasters to em!ower a -udge or 'anger who shall serve the !eo!le under guidelines
!resented by the ransition .ommittee andCor interim government.

Repositor' an$ Re%istration of !reat'
he !ostmaster general of the original, organic !ost office for the united states of )merica is hereby designated
as re!ository for the registration, !ublication and notification of this treaty and Public Declarations of all
acceding members in accordance with )rticle 77 of the 2ienna Convention, :;<;.
Postmaster 2eneral for the Post $ffice for the united states of )merica
cCo >SPS 1D('
D78 +NEnfant Pla/a SW
Washington, D... 4EE4D
E&ecuted this 66
th
day of May, 4E6E.
1E >H*ED S)ES
68EE PEHHSL+Q)H*) )QE. HW
W)S1*H2$H, D... 4EE4E
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
3ames,homasF McBride Postmaster
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]].
witness autogra!h Date
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]].
witness autogra!h Date
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]].
witness autogra!h Date
Servus Servorum Dei