oranbes.com (4.1 /S¥Ie4. <9607132149. AKI 37268245: 13 Jul 199¢ 14:50:58 703 ngs nels Tueszay ana , TBM, OKI nations. Believes the 1.x supply will be je wrong Supply voltage for 1.x suppiies ad should be demanding CMOS only instead of oay nd the nonsymn doesn's want moze supplies than are necessary. oxr: would Like te see Vdd min of 1.6v to keep interpoerability with esa) revised propoaal to be presented in june 12 Sunnyvale meeting. prefer to standardize symmetrically terminated and unterminated case only margin insufficient with deiza Yo © 0.4V Za vour of 0.6 or 0.8v angges to vddg and vref also vddg min is too Low for BICMOS process generator OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY Riss846 ‘x0742-001Tec about no:se inmunity Noise on Vref needs to be less than Linv the input swing may be only 200nV. Neeas possible, need higner vol 6 volts is needed for 5 support was shown on this proposal) be quite a nor issue eto have a 1.6V supply for DRAM ana a The arguement is that the SRAM folks want to he DRAM requirements. Others feel thai have the sane standard. Users seen to feel like tne dard that works established so that systems.) real and that 100mhz is not that the D0 thre, viye suggested that HSTL is the only game perforsance. Fujitsu tried to interject th (of course we nave been running in excess 0) put no one seems to feel that it is ‘500m n of the baliot has included conments that tend to fs is for 1996/1997 system use. Of course tne SRAM now. Ancther example of the flailing at JEDEC. ree and a half hours was spent arguing about © The companies voting no are adamant about 3 is appears there is basically an snpasse. To resolve che tas a motion weaken to send the allot as-is to council and 25 changes ana sens them out £ The motion ne same four companies objecting passing this ballot as sane companies voting no on g rneir vote on the council motion ney have set a standard, but in meeting in September (afver So the conmiztee guys can go home thinking fothing wall be done until the councs Dneeting in Septenber) so unless it passes Council, there will not y opportunicy 20 resolve the issues (if any) raised by Council until eo Decenber meezing. It ig possible that a special meeting could be called re Seprenber and Decenber meetings. if this happens, then the ‘Saves Faised by Touncil (it is expected that there will be such issues) y cous De resolved an avai fe Decenper mee=in3 Secone Showings OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY R155847 ‘x0742-002dea is to use voD0/? £ pas a wired Of operation mode achzeves oy 3 how rhe pulsed pull up is timea, i: Looks : [wnish means it may not wore in a syster) Bass: veefeves and is worse than GT anc RS: as ‘and Vref signals. I always get he terminator supply on cf ORAM modules milion units 300 million units ty asserblers of modules fez relating to a T2pin SIMM(in support thereof), (std the customers are objecting to Bbyte wide SIMMS/DINMS due to cost issue cited is the cost of the connectors. The re use of gold plated connection points and so do the ‘the length of the socket w DIMM, failed ballot 8/7 Hyundai, IBM, Micron, Samsung, TZ, Unisys DIMM, passed balloc 11/4 achi, MitsuDishi, Oki, VLST fengzns of clock traces, very difficult to make sane 99 lines are impossible to pick one value common systems IH? says resistor value non-critical) Mitsubishi comments due to the size of the module, it is aifticuls to route wiring around che buffers to the chips. OK: comments: Does not want to produce modules with PLL, will only produce non-PLL versions Feeis that the 168 pin DIMM is sufficient from a power/gnd perspective, does not wan: additional pins if unnecessary 108 tolerance of PCB impedance and resistors, it is possible 200mHe with a 163pin DIMM Want tne least expensive option. The 200 pin DIMM is too expensive compared OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY R155848 ‘x0742-003