Subject: joel feedback
Date: Fri, 23 May 197 08:08:58 -0700
From: Geoff Tate
To: roberts @rambus.com, mooring@rambus.com, toprani@rambus.com, harmon@rambus.com,
edi@rambus.com
CC: gtate@rambus.com
subodh: joel asking about organization structure and sizes of groups
reporting t2
5ch vp> subodh suggests i probe joel for what he's expecting bo
level/
e/number of people in his group,
Fick: Joel NOT 4
fhe ORAS" s
Pins by nis own admission. in side the
and knows,
less than rick about ORAM architecture, history, directions. as for
joe's role
and day-to-day activity, rick found joel is assuming tony would work for
chnolegist and anything outside of
sAM cick found joel very rusty
him and
that he'd get a group of several senior people that he knows to moni:
azams/ete
‘and do strip backs, etc to determine who infringes and now (but rick
thinks joel
could not do this himself and would be hands-off and would have to have
technical people figure out all this for joel) and then negotiate with then
Fick thiaks Joel's real skill he'd Being to the party would be wheeling and
dealing, not technology/etc
my thoughts at this point: my gut feeling is that what joel will want in
terns of
title, organization, rol n do for us
compensation will exceed what he
feeling more and more like his real strength for us is negotiating deals with
infringers; 1 don't think he can help us in ters of determining what IP
to patent
land how, to negotiate rambus-conpatible contracts, to help us with
strategy or
technical directions, or to determine what products are infringing our IP.
inclined to make him an offer, but i'm now doubtful he'll take it.
let's talk more about his monday at management staff
RH 386360
R 233866
‘OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
"ex0928-001