RICE UNIVERSITY
The Closet in the Colony:
British Colonialism, Indian Nationalism and (Re)Definitions of Gender
and Sexuality
by
Shubha Joshi
A THESIS SUBMITTED
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE
Doctor of Philosophy
APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE:
?
Betty Joseph, Xssociaté Professor, Chair
English
Collgén Lamos, Associate Professor
ie Kripal, J. Newton Rayzor
Professor and Department Chair
Religious Studies
HOUSTON, TEXAS
MAY 2007UMI Number: 3256703
INFORMATION TO USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality ilustrations and
photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignment can adversely affect reproduction
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscrist
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
‘copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion
UMI
UMI Microform 3256703
Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest Information and Learning Company
300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346
‘Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346ABSTRACT
‘The Closet in the Colony:
British Colonialism, Indian Nationalism and (Re)Definitions of Gender and Sexuality
by
Shubha Joshi
My thesis challenges the influential theory that the formation of a nation is
conditional on its ability to marshal normative sexual/gendered citizens: I argue that
nation-formation (and the end of the British rule) in India was contingent to a large
degree upon mobilizing and resignifying non-normative sexual/gender subjectivity.
T begin by suggesting that accusations of “going native” and of having interracial
homoerotic intimacies were related concems, both seen as perversions of upright British
masculinity. Further, I suggest that the anxiety about racial purity and miscegenation that
fed into the heterosexual narrative of rape is also attendant upon the unease surrounding
same-sex intimacy between an English and a native male, With this critical lens in mind,
I provide a new reading of two canonical texts, A Passage to India and Burmese Days.
Next, I navigate the link between Indian independence and queemess, rereading
key colonial moments (like the incorporation of the anti-sodomy statute in the Indian
penal code, the bowdlerization of native literature, the Hindu reformist movement), texts
(such as Anandamath and Gora) and personages (M. K. Gandhi) within this new
interpretive schema, I seek to fill a critical interstice in the work on Gandhi: there is, 1
suggest, an enormous potential for a new queer perspective in understanding Gandhi,
and—because his politics and life informed each other—also Gandhian nationalism