Ed 502 Comparison Chart

MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald ED 502 Comparison Chart for State Report Card
Data Type of District (your school or district should fall into one of these three categories. How many state standards were met by the district? Is the overall VALUE ADDED data considered ABOVE, MET, or BELOW? What is the percentage of economically disadvantaged? What is the graduation rate? What is the attendance rate? What is the annual spending rate per pupil for instructional expenditures? Rural District Marlington Local Suburban District North Canton City Schools
April 6, 2013
Urban District Canton City
25
26
Not Met
Met
Not Met
40%
18.4%
82.4%
92.2% 95.2% $8595.00
92.7% 96.4% $9523.00
71.2% 93.6% $11,307.00
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald

What were the percentages for the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
5.2
3.1 12. 5 51. 6 32. 8
9.0 18. 1 33. 9 23. 2
4.6 18.0 34.6 29.0
14.3
3.4
1.6 6.5 48.4 43.5
5.5 14.9 37.5 22.4
2.3 22.3 34.3 22.3
4.8 8.1 24.2 29.0
15. 8 20. 9 42. 5 15. 4 5.4
6.6 20. 3 56. 2 16. 7 0.2
17. 7 22. 9 35. 7 13. 3 10. 4
13. 1 43. 2 26. 3 13. 1 4.2
24.4 16.5 29.2 16.7
11.8
4.8
7.8
44.7
20.6
44.7
24.8
30.2
24.9
ACC
ACC
13.5
0.0
Adv
Adv
Explanation of graphs: The graphs on the left show the subgroups % of scores in Limited, Basic, Proficient, Accelerated, and Advanced for all 5 subject areas. The graphs on the right show the same information but the bars are stacked so it is easier to see overall trends of achievement in each subject area.
Rural
L 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. B P ACC Adv
60 40 20 Adv 0
Adv
15. 8
13.8
30.2
19.2
0.0
19.7
18.9
33.9
ACC
13.1
Rural
L B P ACC Adv L
Reading
Math
Suburban
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writ ing Mat h Science Soc. St u. L B P ACC Adv
Reading
50 40 30 20 10 0
Suburban
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science
Math
Math
Math
Adv
Math
B P ACC Adv
L
Soc. Stu.
Urban
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 L B P ACC Adv
Urban
60 L 40 20 Adv 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 L B P ACC Adv

What were the percentages for Asian/Pacifi c Islander subgroup for areas of: limited, basic, proficient, accelerated, and advanced?
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science ------
Math
Math
Math
3.9 B B
8.3
2.0
16.0
0.0 B
NA
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
--
0. 0 10 .0 60 .0 20 .0 10 .0
--
10.0
--
--
17.6 P P
16.7
13.7
4.0
8.3 P
50.0
--
--
ACC
ACC
43.1 Adv Adv
16.7
70.6
52.0
66.7 Adv
ACC
35.3
58.3
11.8
28.0
25.0
10.0
--
--
20.0
--
--
Suburban
80 80 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv 60 40 20
Suburban
Soc. St.
L B Adv P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Urban
80 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. St. L B P ACC Adv
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Urban
Soc. Stu.
L B Adv P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Soc. St.
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentage s for Black, NonHispanic subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 16. 9 47. 6 22. 9 9.7 3.0
0.0 L
--
4.3
0.0
8.7 B
--
43.5
30.0
60.9 P
--
21.7
40.0
26.1 ACC
--
26.1
10.0
4.3 Adv
--
4.3
20.0
3.0 L
--
6.1
0.0
18 .8 23 .0 B 42 .8 P 11 .4 3. 9
7.2
21. 8 27. 0 35. 0 9.6
29.1
6.1 B
--
15.2
27. 8 50. 0 16. 7 5.6
--
23.8
19.2
60.6 P
--
48.5
--
54.0
28.2
24.2 ACC
--
27.3
-ACC
13.6
14.5
6.1 Adv
--
3.0
-Adv
1.3
6.6
9.0
Rural
80 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
80 60 40 20
Rural
Soc. Stu.
Math
Math
Math
L Adv B P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Suburban 80 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
80 60 40 20
Suburban
Soc. Stu.
L Adv B P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Urban
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Urban
Soc. Stu.
L B ACC P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Soc. Stu.
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentage NA s for American Indian/Al aska Native
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science ------
NA
0. 0 15 .4 B 53 .8 P 23 .1 7. 7
--
0.0
--
--
30. 8 30. 8 7.7
--
--
--
--
--
ACC
--
No graph
Adv
30. 8
--
Soc. Stu.
Math
Math
Math
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentage s for Hispanic subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 5.6 52. 8 19. 4 19. 4 2.8
0.0 L 9.1 B 45.5 P 36.4 AC C 9.1 Ad v
------
0.0 9.1 27.3 27.3 36.4
------
-L -B -P -AC C -Ad v
5.1 7.7 35. 9 28. 2 23. 1
------
7.7 12. 8 35. 9 23. 1 20. 5
0.0 28. 6 42. 9 14. 3 14. 3
----Ad v AC C P B L
9. 0 21 .0 47 .0 17 .0 6. 0
------
18. 0 18. 0 37. 0 15. 0 12. 0
------
Rural
50 Rural
50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu.
L B P ACC Adv
Reading
40 30 20 10 0
Soc. Stu.
Math
Math
Math
L Adv B P ACC Adv
Math
Suburban 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

50 40 30 20 10 0
Suburban
Soc. Stu.
L B Adv P ACC Adv L
Reading
Math
Urban 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
Urban 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Soc. Stu.
L B Adv P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Soc. Stu.
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentage s for MultiRacial subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 10. 3 36. 8 32. 6 15. 8 4.5
Math
Math
Math
3.0 L 12.1 B 42.4 P 30.3 12.1 Ad v
------
11.8 8.8 38.2 23.5 17.6
6.3 25.0 31.3 37.5 0.0
-L -B -P --Ad v
5.3 5.3 35. 1 31. 6 22. 8
------
7.0 8.8 35. 1 29. 8 19. 3
0.0 16. 7 44. 4 16. 7 22. 2
-----Ad v P B L
12 .3 17 .6 43 .9 19 .0 7. 2
4.5 12. 5 61. 4 21. 6 0.0
14. 1 20. 6 38. 7 14. 6 12. 0
20.5 17.0 30.7 19.3 12.5
AC C
AC C
AC C
Rural
50
Rural
40
Soc. Stu.
Adv
Science
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu.
L B P ACC
30 20 10 0 ACC L B P ACC Adv
Reading
Writing
Suburban
50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
50 40 30 20 10 0
Suburban
Math
Soc. Stu.
L B ACC P ACC Adv
Reading
Writing
Math
Science
Urban
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Urban
Soc. Stu.
L B ACC P ACC Adv
Reading
Writing
Math
Science
Soc. Stu.
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentage s for White, NonHispanic subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 7.9 33. 5 29. 0 19. 6 10. 0
3.3 L
1.1
5.0
2.2
5.3 L
1.1
0.5
2.7
1.1
1.0 L
10 .9 15 .7 39 .8 22 .0 11 .6
5.3
11. 3 15. 5 35. 5 17. 4 20. 3
16.0
7.5 B
7.4
11.4
10.8
3.7 B
4.8
1.6
7.4
36.4 P
37.4
31.3
27.8
ACC
ACC
Adv
Adv
Rural
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
Reading
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Adv
23.2
1.1
26.6
29.1
42. 1
26. 4
2.6
34. 8
32. 8
59. 4
ACC
29.6
53.2
25.8
30.0
28. 9
36. 3
70. 4
25. 4
27. 4
22. 0
20. 0
31. 4
24. 9
29. 6
27. 9
15. 2
10. 8
2.4
16. 0 44. 3 33. 6 0.8
10.3
27.5
19.1
27.1
Rural
ACC
Math
Suburban
Suburban
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv
80 60 40 20 ACC L B P ACC Adv
Reading
Soc. Stu.
Math
Reading
Soc. Stu.
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Reading Writing
Urban
50 40 Urban
L B P ACC Adv
30 20 10 0 ACC L B P ACC Adv L
Math
Science
Soc. Stu.
Math
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Math
Math
Math
L B P ACC Adv
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentages for Students with Disabilities subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 32. 4 46. 2 12. 2 5.6 3.7
12.8 L
3.4
19.6
8.7
22.5 B
27.6
29.2
30.4
45.0 P
44.8
26.0
26.1
ACC
ACC
Adv
Adv
Adv
8.3
3.4
10.5
7.6
17 .9
12. 5
2.9
13. 3
9.2
17. 6
ACC
11.5
20.7
14.6
27.2
17 .9
14. 1
23. 5
9.1
23. 9
20. 6
39 .3
47. 1
55. 9
33. 7
29. 4
38. 2
7. 1
19. 4
14. 7
26. 9
30. 3
14. 7
17 .9
6.8
2.9
17. 0
7.3
8.8
36. 9 31. 1 22. 8 5.4
24. 8 40. 0 28. 8 2.4
43. 9 27. 4 17. 5 6.1
53.6
16.8
16.0
5.6
3.8
4.0
5.0
8.0
Rural 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

50 40 30 20 10 0
Rural
ACC
Reading
Writing
Math
Science
Suburban
Suburban
60
60 50 L 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. B P ACC Adv
50 40 30 20 10 0 ACC L B P ACC
Reading
Soc. Stu.
Writing
Math
Science
Soc. Stu.
L B P ACC Adv
Math
Math
Math
Urban
Urban
60 50 L 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. B P ACC Adv
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 L B P ACC ACC Adv
Soc. Stu.
Adv
Reading
Math
Soc. Stu.
MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald What were the percentages for Limited English Proficiency subgroup
April 6, 2013
Soc. Stu.
Soc. Stu.
Reading
Reading
Reading
Writing
Writing
Writing
Science
Science
Science 7.7 69. 2 23. 1 0.0 0.0
0.0 L
--
0.0
--
-L
0.0 B
--
7.7
--
-B
5.0
--
69.2 P
--
38.5
--
-P
ACC
ACC
Adv
Adv
Rural 80 L 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. B P ACC Adv
Adv
7.7
--
23.1
--
--
15. 0
--
35. 0
--
--
ACC
23.1
--
30.8
--
--
35. 0
--
10. 0
--
--
35. 0
--
25. 0
--
15. 0
--
--
10. 0
--
15. 0
--
10. 5 18. 4 60. 5 10. 5 0.0
--
26. 3 18. 4 36. 8 18. 4 0.0
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Rural
Soc. Stu.
Math
Math
Math
L B ACC P ACC Adv
Reading
Math
Suburban
Suburban
Reading
Math
Reading
Writing
Math
Science
Soc. Stu.
Urban
Urban
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu.
80
L B P ACC Adv
60 40 20 Adv L B P ACC Adv
Reading
Soc. Stu.
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
L B P ACC Adv
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Soc. Stu.
L B ACC L P ACC Adv
Math
Soc. Stu.
April 6, 2013
How many 63.9% 62.1% 71% teachers have a MA degree in the district? (%) In regards to equity and equality in education, what did you learn from completing this report card comparison? In general, I was surprised to see the vast difference in test scores between the suburban and urban settings. I assumed that some subgroups would have similar test scores in both settings, but was really shocked by the overwhelming disparity in most groups. It makes me question even more the issues of equality and equity. If this comparison of three schools in the stark county area is an indicator of the larger population, there is significant reason for concern. It appears that the urban setting does not provide equality or equity. In this comparison, disadvantaged students, students of every race, and more importantly students with disabilities all show lower test scores in the urban setting. The Asian/Pacific Islander group was especially enlightening. In the suburban setting, the Asian population had a low percentage of students scoring in the basic or limited categories, with a large percentage scoring in the accelerated and advanced categories. In the urban setting there was a significant downward shift in scores with the highest percentage in the proficient category. More troubling was the students with disabilities subgroup. While many students in rural and suburban settings had scores that were proficient, the overwhelming majority of students with disabilities in the urban setting had basic and limited scores. The same
April 6, 2013
trend, although not quite as severe showed for students who were in the subcategory of limited English proficient. It is also surprising to me that in the urban setting more money is spent per child and the teachers have more education overall. Again, if this comparison is an indicator of the larger population, it underscores the need to fund and support our urban schools.

Ed 502 Comparison Chart

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Ed 502 Comparison Chart

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald ED 502 Comparison Chart for State Report Card

Urban District Canton City

92.2% 95.2% $8595.00

92.7% 96.4% $9523.00

71.2% 93.6% $11,307.00

MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald

3.1 12. 5 51. 6 32. 8

9.0 18. 1 33. 9 23. 2

4.6 18.0 34.6 29.0

1.6 6.5 48.4 43.5

5.5 14.9 37.5 22.4

2.3 22.3 34.3 22.3

4.8 8.1 24.2 29.0

15. 8 20. 9 42. 5 15. 4 5.4

6.6 20. 3 56. 2 16. 7 0.2

17. 7 22. 9 35. 7 13. 3 10. 4

13. 1 43. 2 26. 3 13. 1 4.2

24.4 16.5 29.2 16.7

MU502 Ethical and Moral Foundations of Leadership Darlene Howald

43.1 Adv Adv

L B Adv P ACC Adv

L B Adv P ACC Adv

Science 16. 9 47. 6 22. 9 9.7 3.0

21. 8 27. 0 35. 0 9.6

27. 8 50. 0 16. 7 5.6

L Adv B P ACC Adv

Suburban 80 60 40 20 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

L Adv B P ACC Adv

L B ACC P ACC Adv

30. 8 30. 8 7.7

Science 5.6 52. 8 19. 4 19. 4 2.8

0.0 L 9.1 B 45.5 P 36.4 AC C 9.1 Ad v

0.0 9.1 27.3 27.3 36.4

5.1 7.7 35. 9 28. 2 23. 1

7.7 12. 8 35. 9 23. 1 20. 5

0.0 28. 6 42. 9 14. 3 14. 3

18. 0 18. 0 37. 0 15. 0 12. 0

50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu.

L Adv B P ACC Adv

Suburban 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

L B Adv P ACC Adv L

Urban 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

L B Adv P ACC Adv

Science 10. 3 36. 8 32. 6 15. 8 4.5

3.0 L 12.1 B 42.4 P 30.3 12.1 Ad v

11.8 8.8 38.2 23.5 17.6

6.3 25.0 31.3 37.5 0.0

5.3 5.3 35. 1 31. 6 22. 8

7.0 8.8 35. 1 29. 8 19. 3

0.0 16. 7 44. 4 16. 7 22. 2

4.5 12. 5 61. 4 21. 6 0.0

14. 1 20. 6 38. 7 14. 6 12. 0

20.5 17.0 30.7 19.3 12.5

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu.

30 20 10 0 ACC L B P ACC Adv

L B ACC P ACC Adv

L B ACC P ACC Adv

Science 7.9 33. 5 29. 0 19. 6 10. 0

11. 3 15. 5 35. 5 17. 4 20. 3

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv

16. 0 44. 3 33. 6 0.8

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Reading Writing Math Science Soc. Stu. L B P ACC Adv