Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT DAN KOMUNIKASI

MULTIMEDIA NETWORKING BITS3333 LAB 7 OPNET IT Queuing Disciplines 3BITC S2G1

NAME & MATRIC NO

MOHAMAD WAFIUDDIN BIN MOHAMAD GHAZALI

B031110303

LECTURER NAME DATE

EN. MOHAMAD RADZI MOTSIDI

LAB 7: Queuing Disciplines

1. Objective The objective of this lab is to examine the effect of different queuing disciplines on packet delivery and delay for different services.

2. Procedure 2.1 Network Model

Figure 1: Network Model i. To create this network model, we need application config, profile config, QoS attribute config, 5 ethernet wkstn, 1 ethernet server and 2 ethernet4_slip8_gtwy routers. ii. iii. iv. Use PPP_DS1 link to connect both routers together. For workstation and server to the routers use 10Base_T to connect it. Rename all devices and then configure application, profiles, queues and routers.

2.2 i. ii.

Choose Statistic Right click at anywhere workspace and the select Choose Individual Statistics. After that select global statistics => IP(Traffic Dropped) =>Video Conferencing(Traffic Received)=>Voices(Packet Delay Variation, Packet End-toEnd, Traffic Received) and the click ok.

2.3 i.

Run Simulation To run simulation, we set the duration to be 150 seconds and the click OK.

Figure 2: Configuration Simulation

ii.

Open the manage scenarios then change the values under the results column to <collect> or <recollect> for 3 scenarios.

Figure 3: Manage Scenarios iii. Click OK to run 3 simulations.

3. Result a) Result for the IP Traffic dropped statistic. View the compare result.

Traffic Dropping: Three simulations have been executed using OPNET software for every queuing scheme in terms of packet dropping, traffic receiving, packet end-to-end delay and it is tested for video conferencing, Voice traffic and FTP.

Figure 4: IP Traffic Dropped

Figure above shows traffic dropping statistic where it can be observed that in the cases of FIFO, PQ and WFQ the packet drop starts at near 95 seconds. Packet drop for FIFO is higher than the other. PQ is lower and for WFQ, there is no packet drop.

b) Video Conferencing Traffic Received.

Figure 5: Video Conferencing Traffic Received

c) Video Packet End to End Delay

Figure 6: Voice Packet End to End Delay

d) Voice Packet Delay Variation

Figure 7: Voice Packet Delay Variation

Packet Delay variation time for VOIP, for all the case such as time increase or traffic increase PQ and WFQ groups packet delay time line always shows the same characteristics that is packet delay time is nearly zero. For FIFO group is always higher.

4. Conclusion As the conclusion, the comparison result shows that the PQ group performance always depends on traffic number and shows better output even when the number of client increases and its performance is better than FIFO group in some cases. FIFO group performance is also better in some cases compared with PQ group. Now, if we compare WFQ group with FIFO and PQ group in case of traffic drop. File receiving, voice data receive and video conferencing; WFQ always shows the best performance among them. As we know there are some problems with the integration between VOIP architecture and Internet. So it can be said with confidence that user traffic stream like voice, video, data can be easily transferred with its efficient level performance by using WFQ algorithm in routers where the voice, video and data streams are routed to go to their desired destination.

5. Question 1) Analyze the graphs we obtained and verify the overlap of the voice packet end-toend delay and voice packet variation graphs. Compare the three queuing disciplines and explain their effect on the performance of the three applications. 2) In the implemented project, edit queues object and check the profiles assigned to the FIFO, PQ and WFQ disciplines. 3) For all scenarios, choose the queuing delay statistic for the link that connects east router and west router.

Вам также может понравиться