4.9K views

Uploaded by Awni Alkhteeb

Post-tension Flat Slab Design Example

- Post Tensioned Slabs
- GuideToPost-tensionedSlabs
- post tensioning
- Long-Hand Design of a Two-Way Post-Tensioned Floor System
- Bentley ram concept guide
- Post-tensioned Concrete Floor -S.khan
- Post Tensioned Concrete Floors in Multi Storey Buildings
- Post Tension Ing
- Post-Tensioning Manual 6thEd
- 9781483403724.pdf
- Tr 43 Post-tensioned Concrete Floors-Design Handbook
- CEB FIP DesignOfPost-TensionedSlabsAndFoundations
- Post Tension Slabs
- Post Tension BIJAN AALAMI
- PTI Post-Tensioning Manual 6th Edition
- ADAPT PT Training Manual
- Post- Tension Tendon Installation and Grouting Manual 2013
- 2011 Post-Tensioning Institute Publications Catalog
- Post Tensioning[1]
- POST TENSIONED SLABS

You are on page 1of 17

Prepared by:

Nov. 2008

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

A post-tensioned prestressed banded flat slab floor system for an office complex is shown in figure.1 together with atypical sub-frame section. The structure is checked both at serviceability and ultimate limit states. These checks are carried out at serviceability and ultimate limit states. These checks are carried out at transfer and under working loads conditions.

1.

1.1

Material:

Figure 1: structural plan

Concrete: Unit weight = 24 KN/m3 fck = 40 MPa fcu = 50 MPa fcui = 25 MPa Ec = 30 GPa Eci =25 GPa (cylinder strength at 28 day) (cube strength at 28 day) (strength at transfer) (elastic modulus at 28 day) (elastic modulus at transfer)

Prestressing steel: 12.9 mm diameter super strand placed in metal ducts. Pk = 186 KN (characteristic strength of strand) Aps = 100 mm2 (area of strand) fpu = Pk/Aps = 1860 MPa (characteristic strength of prestress steel) Eps= 195 GPa (elastic modulus)

2

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

1.2

Loading:

Imposed loading: (according to architectural drawing) Partition = 2.0 KN/m2 Finishing = 1.5 KN/m2 Services and false ceiling = 0.5 KN/m2 Total S.I.D.L = 4.0 KN/m2 Live load: Typical offices building = 3.0 KN/m2 Total imposed loading = 4.0 + 3.0 = 7.0 KN/m2

1.3

Serviceability classifications:

BS 8110 code, TR 43 - 1st Eedition. Class 3.

2.

2.1

Design step:

Preliminary designs:

For normal slab load, and initial span, we can take span/depth = 42 10,000 240mm 42 Punching shear affected by size of column and slab thickness. However to reduce shear reinforcement requirement a depth of 250 mm is chosen.

Self weight = 6.0 KN/m2 Total dead load = 4.0 + 6.0 =10.0 KN/m2 Total live load = 3.0 KN/m2 Balanced load:

In these example a balanced load consisting 60% of all dead load is chosen 0.6 X 10 = 6 KN/m2.

2.2

Tendon profile:

Nominal cover requirement in accordance with BS 8110-1, sec.3.4: For 2 hour fire resistance take cover = 25 mm.

3

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

Note:

The positioning of reinforcement must be considered at this stage, so as to obtain practical arrangement of the steel at support. Based on tendon eccentricities show in figure.3 and the position of inflection point (0.1 times the span from the center of the supports) the tendon profile can be calculated.

At these stage losses are assumed as follows: At transfer 10% of the jacking load. At service 20% of the jacking load.

A through check will be carried out after the stress calculates to check that these initial assumptions are reasonable.

2.3

The initial prestress force i.e jacking force, has been taken to be 75% of the characteristic strand strength (BS8110-1:1197, sec 4.7.1). Calculation of Pavg: Jacking force (Pj) = 0.75 X 186 = 139.5 KN/strand. Prestress force at transfer (Po) = 125.55 KN/strand. Prestress force at service (Pe) =111.6 KN/strand. (10% losses) (20% losses)

Next the value of prestress force required in each span is calculate, this is done using the chosen balanced load of 6.0 KN/m2 (60% of dead load) the distance between points of inflection, s, and the drape, a, as shown in figure.4, (refer to appendix A for profile calculation)

4

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

The prestress force is obtained from the following equation which assumes a parabolic profile.

Prqd = ws 2 8a

For span A-B and C-D: Prqd = (6.0 X 7.0 X 64002) / (8.0 X 67.5 X 1000) = 3185 KN Therefore number of the tendons = Prqd / effective force = 3185 / 111.6 = 28.54 Try 30 tendons per panel 10 X 3S or 6 X 5S (more economical).

For span B-C: Prqd = (6.0 X 7.0 X 80002) / (8.0 X 120 X 1000) = 2800 KN Therefore number of the tendons = 2800 / 111.6 = 25 Try 30 tendons per panel as before 6 X 5S.

The effect of the tendon in the slab is modeled by mean of equivalent as shown below. It should be noted that the portions of cable from the edges of the slab to grid lines A and D are horizontal and so do not contribute to the equivalent load. The equivalent load w, between any two points of inflection for the chosen number of tendons is given by: W= 8 a n Pav s2

Where: n: number of strand. a: drab at the point considered (up +, down -). s: distance between point of inflection.

5

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

Table 1 : Calculations of equivalent loads due to transverse tendons

Table 2 : Calculations of equivalent loads due to transverse tendons

2.4

Stresses Calculations:

ft = P P.e M A M S + + Ac Zt Zt Zt P P.e M A M S + A c Zb Zb Zb

fb =

Where: MA = moment due live and dead load. MS = moment due secondary effect. Zt = top section modulus. Zb = bottom section modulus. Ac = 7.0 X 0.25 X 106 =1.75 X 106 mm2 As the section being considered is rectangular and symmetrical abut about the centroid, Zt and Zb are equal. Zt =Zb = Z = bh2/6 = 7.29 X 107mm3

6

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.4.1

Allowable stresses:

Maximum allowable concrete compressive and tensile stresses for floor with banded tendon are given in BS 8110, part 1, section 4.3.4.2 and 4.3.4.3. Allowable Stresses at transfer: Compression = 0.5 f ci = 0.5 25 = 12.5 MPa Tension = 0.36 f ci = 0.36 25 = 1.8 MPa

Allowable Stresses at service: Compression = 0.4 f cu = 0.4 50 = 20 MPa Tension: tensile stresses calculated to limit the crack width see table 3.

Design stresses for concrete grade 40 N/mm2 50 and over 30 N/mm2 N/mm2 3.2 4.1 4.8 3.8 5.0 5.8

2.4.2

Figure 6 : moment digram for own weight

7

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.4.3

Stresses at transfer:

Po = 30 X 125.55 = 3766.5 KN

Table 4 : Stresses at transver for the transverse direction

ZONE

FIBER

e(mm)

top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom

-2.152 -2.152 1.98 -6.29 -5.77 1.47 -5.77 1.47 1.98 -6.29 -5.77 1.47 -5.77 1.47 1.98 -6.29 -2.152 -2.152

STRESS DUE TO SELF WEIGHT (MPa) 3.00 -3.00 -1.54 1.54 3.13 -3.13 4.79 -4.79 -2.41 2.41 2.41 -2.41 3.13 -3.13 -1.54 1.54 3.00 -3.00

STATE

0.85 -5.152 0.44 -4.75 -2.64 -1.66 -0.98 -3.32 -0.43 -3.88 -3.66 -0.94 -2.64 -1.66 0.44 -4.75 0.85 -5.15

1.8 -12.5 -12.5 1.8 1.8 -12.5 1.8 -12.5 -12.5 1.8 1.8 -12.5 1.8 -12.5 -12.5 1.8 1.8 -12.5

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

8

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.4.4

Stresses at service:

Po = 30 X 111.6 = 3348 KN

Table 5 : Stresses after all stresses for the transverse direction

ZONE

FIBER

e(mm)

top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom top bottom

-1.913 -1.913 1.76 -5.59 -5.12 1.30 -5.12 1.30 1.76 -5.59 -5.12 1.30 -5.12 1.3 1.76 -5.59 -1.913 -1.913

STRESS DUE TO SELF WEIGHT (MPa) 6.55 -6.55 -3.35 3.35 6.76 -6.76 10.38 -10.38 -5.23 5.23 10.38 -10.38 6.76 -6.76 -3.35 3.35 6.55 -6.55

STATE

4.64 -8.46 -1.59 -2.24 1.64 -5.46 -9.08 -3.47 -0.36 5.26 -9.08 1.64 -5.46 -1.59 -2.24 4.64 -8.46

5.8 -20.0 -20.0 4.8 5.8 -20.0 5.8 -20.0 -20.0 4.8 5.8 -20.0 5.8 -20.0 -20.0 4.8 5.8 -20.0

OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

2.5

2.5.1

Determination of hyperstatic action:

Hyperstatic moments can be calculated either directly or indirectly (Alami, 1998b) for skeletal members, such as beams and floor systems that are modeled as strips of isolated slab frames , hyperstatic actions can be successfully calculated using both methods. In this example we will use the indirect method (covenantal method) in calculation of hyperstatic action. Indirect method is based on the following relationship: Mhyp = Mbal P.e Where: e = eccentricity of post-tensioning with respect to the neutral axis of the section (positive if CGS is above the neutral axes otherwise negative). Mhyp =hyperstatic moment. Mbal = balanced moment due to balanced load. P = post-tensioning force positive 9

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

Wbal = 8 a n Pav s2

Figure 8 : moment diagram for balance load

At support A: Mbal= 232 KN.m , Pe = 3348 KN , e = 0.0 mm Mhyp= (232) + (3348 X 0 / 1000) = 232 KN.m

At center of span AB: Mbal= -117.7 KN.m , Pe = 3348 KN , e = 45-125 = -80 mm Mhyp= (-117.7) + (3348 X 80 / 1000) = 150.14 KN.m

At left of support B: Mbal= 238.1 KN.m , Pe = 3348 KN , e = -70 mm Mhyp= (238.1) - (3348 X 70 / 1000) = 3.74 KN.m

10

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.5.2

The load combination for ultimate strength design: MU = 1.4 MD.L + 1.6 ML.L + 1.0 Mhyp

11

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.5.3

Design section:

Section analyses may be carried out in accordance with clause 3.7 of BS 8110, part 1, the moment capacity of the section can calculated using following equation. Mu = fPb Aps (d- dn) Where: Mu = design moment of resistance of the section. fPb = design tensile strength in the tendon. Aps = area of prestressing tendon in the tension zone. d = effective depth to the centroid of the steel area. dn = depth of centroid of the compression zone = 0.45x. x = depth of neutral axis. b = effective width of the section.

- When d = 125 mm. f pu Aps 1860 30 100 = = 0.127 f cu bd 50 7000 125

1116 = 0.6 f pk 1860 From table 4.4 BS 8110. Sec 4.3.7.3 finds value of fPb and x. fPb = 1731.7 MPa x = 36.25 mm dn = 0.45 x 36.25 = 16.3 mm Mu = -1731.7 x 30 x 100 x (125-16.3) = -564 KN.m f pe =

When d = 205 mm. f pu Aps 1860 30 100 = = 0.078 f cu bd 50 7000 205 f pe 1116 = = 0.6 f pk 1860 fPb = 1767 MPa x = 35.9 mm dn = 0.45 x 35.9 = 16.14 mm Mu = 1767 x 30 x 100 x (205-16.14) = 1001 KN.m - When d = 195 mm. f pu Aps 1860 30 100 = 0.08 = f cu bd 50 7000 195 f pe 1116 = = 0.6 f pk 1860 fPb = -1767 MPa x = 35.1 mm dn = 0.45 x 35.1 = 15.8 mm Mu = -1767 x 30 x 100 x (195-15.8) = -950 KN.m

12

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

Table 6 : Comparison between applied moment and moment capacity at ultimate limit state

ZONE A AB B B BC C C CD D

M (KN.m)/panel (applied) -411 503.42 -708.62 -911.0 609.8 -911.0 -708.62 503.42 -411

Mu (KN.m)/panel (capacity) -564 1001 -950 -950 1001 -950 -950 1001 -564

Because the moment capacity at ultimate limit state > applied moment, no un-tensioned reinforcement is required.

2.5.4

Reinforcement required = 0.075% Ac Ac = hb = 250 X 7000 = 1.75 X 106 mm2 As = 0.00075 X 1.75 X 106 = 1312.5 mm2 Use 7 T 16 = 1407 mm2 The reinforcement should extend into the span by 0.2 span measured from the centerline of the column and the width of strip is the column breadth plus 3 times the slab depth as shown in figure 13.

13

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.6

Post-tension losses:

2.6.1.1 Friction losses:

Px = Po e - x( + ) Where: Px = Force at distance x from stressed end. Po = 139.5 KN (Stressing force (at anchor)). = 0.2 (friction coefficient). = angle change in tendon from anchor to point considered (radians). = 0.0085 (wobble factor (radians/m)) Total drape from figure.3 (refer to appendix A for profile calculation) Total drab for span A-B and span C-D: (18.6+26.3)/2 + 67.5 = 89.95 mm Total drab for span B-C: (30+30)/2 + 120 = 150 mm

16 total drape L2 (16 89.95 10 3 ) 1 = 3 = = 0.023 rad / m 82 (16 150 10 3 ) 2 = = 0.024 rad / m 10 2

PA = 139.5 KN PB = (139.5) e-(0.2)(8)(0.023+0.0085) = 132.64 KN PC = (132.64) e-(0.2)(10)(0.024+0.0085) = 124.3 KN PD = (124.3) e-(0.2)(8)(0.023+0.0085) = 118.2 KN (139.5 + 132.64 + 124.3 + 118.2) = 128.66 KN 4

Pavg =

14

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.6.1.2

Because Length of the tendon 26 m < 30 m so use one live end. Pw = 2 L P Where: Pw = Force losses due draw-in. E PS PS L' = (Length of the tendon affected by draw-in). P' (PA - PD ) (Slop of the force profile). P' = (L1 + L 2 + L 3 ) = 6 mm (Wedge draw-in). Eps = Modulus of elasticity of the tendon. Aps = Area of the tendon. P' = (139.5 - 118.2) = 0.82 KN (8 + 10 + 8)

(6 X 10 -3 X 195 X 100) = 11.95 m < Length of the tendon 0.82

L' =

2.6.1.3

Pes = es Eps Aps Where: Pes = Force losses due Elastic shortening. es = 0.5 fco/ Eci fco = n Po /bh (stress in concrete adjacent to the tendon after transfer). Eci = Modulus of elasticity of concrete at time of transfer. fco = (5 X 139.5 X 103)/ (1500 X 250) = 1.86 MPa es = 0.5 X1.86/ 2500 = 3.72 X 10-5 Pes = 3.72 X 10-5 X 195000 X 100 / 1000 = 0.725 KN

15

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

2.6.2

2.6.2.1

Long-term losses:

Creep of concrete losses:

Pcr = cr Eps Aps Where: Pcr = Force losses due creep. cr = fco/ Eci = 2.9 (creep coefficient (BS 8110, part 2, figure.1)) cr = 2.9 X 1.86 / 25000 = 2.16 X 10-4 Pcr = (2.16 X 10-4 X 195000 X 100) / (1000) = 4.21 KN

2.6.2.2 Shrinkage of concrete losses:

Psh = sh Eps Aps sh = 300 X 10-6 Pcr = (300 X 10-6X 195000 X 100) / (1000) = 5.85 KN

2.6.2.3 Relaxation of the tendon losses:

Pr = 1000 hour relaxation value x relaxation factor x the pre-stressed force at transfer. Pi =139.5 -10.84 19.6 0.725 = 108.3 KN Pr = 0.035 X 1.5 X 108.3 = 5.69 KN

2.6.3 Summary for P.T losses:

Short-term losses: 1- Friction losses = 10.84 KN . 7.7% 2- Wedge set losses = 4.48 KN ... 3.2% 3- Elastic shortening losses = 0.725 KN ..... 0.5%

Total short-term losses = 16.1 KN ....... 11.5% long-term losses: 1- Creep of concrete losses = 4.21 KN .. 3.0% 2- Shrinkage of concrete losses = 5.85 KN ... 4.2% 3- Relaxation of the tendon losses = 5.69 KN ... 4.0%

Total long-term losses = 15.75 KN ... 11.2% Total losses = 31.85 KN ...... 22.8% 16

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

jX + mX+n = 0 m = (p2-2L)(q1 q2 ) + p1 (q3- q2) = (800 - 2 X 8000) (125-45) + 800 (195 - 45) = -1096000 n = (q1-q2)(L-P2)L = (125-45)(8000-800)8000 =4608X106 L =(-m [ m2 4 j n ] )/ 2 j = (1096000 1577973.384 ) /-140 = -19094 , 3442.67 L = 3442.67 mm a1 = [(q1 q2)P1]/ L = [80 X 800] / 3442.67 = 18.6 mm a2 = [(q3 q2)P2]/ [L-L]= [150 X 800] / 4557.33 = 26.33 mm - for span B-C: q1 = q3 = 195 mm, P1=1000 , L= 5000 a4 = [195 - 45] X 1000 / 5000 = 30 mm

17

www.jea.org.jo

etc@jea.org.jo

- Post Tensioned SlabsUploaded byMaad Ahmed Al-Maroof
- GuideToPost-tensionedSlabsUploaded byyy2010
- post tensioningUploaded byimzee25
- Long-Hand Design of a Two-Way Post-Tensioned Floor SystemUploaded bycancery0707
- Bentley ram concept guideUploaded bychauhannisharg
- Post-tensioned Concrete Floor -S.khanUploaded byACS
- Post Tensioned Concrete Floors in Multi Storey BuildingsUploaded bymohammed_fathelbab
- Post Tension IngUploaded byGlen Beale
- Post-Tensioning Manual 6thEdUploaded bymohanuma
- 9781483403724.pdfUploaded byM Refaat Fath
- Tr 43 Post-tensioned Concrete Floors-Design HandbookUploaded byJaffar Isam Al-Aloosi
- CEB FIP DesignOfPost-TensionedSlabsAndFoundationsUploaded byAslemm14
- Post Tension SlabsUploaded bycrazy_990
- Post Tension BIJAN AALAMIUploaded byKhaled Abdelbaki
- PTI Post-Tensioning Manual 6th EditionUploaded byjackj_182073983
- ADAPT PT Training ManualUploaded bygoblue11112
- Post- Tension Tendon Installation and Grouting Manual 2013Uploaded bybala-kris
- 2011 Post-Tensioning Institute Publications CatalogUploaded byPTIPubs
- Post Tensioning[1]Uploaded byMay Fadrigore
- POST TENSIONED SLABSUploaded byTlvs Murthy
- 2006-Post-Tensioning Manual - 6th Edition.pdfUploaded byArdiaTiaraR
- Fundamentals of Post-Tensioned Concrete Design for BuildingsUploaded bysalaverria
- Chapter 5 Post-Tensioned SlabUploaded bySharan Bvp
- Post Tensioning manualUploaded byimzee25
- Post Tension Design of SlabUploaded byVikram Jain
- Post-Tensioned Concrete FloorsUploaded byhangvo16
- 242403525 ADAPT PT 2014 Cracked Version DownloadUploaded bySamang Hai
- Post Tensioned Design1Uploaded bySanjoy Sanyal
- ACI Post Tension DesignUploaded byDuaa Makki
- POST TENSIONING MANUAL 6TH ED 1-15Uploaded bystructural engineer 02

- Quantitative Models for Microscopic to Macroscopic Biological Macromolecules and TissuesUploaded byfitoscribd
- Correspondence Truth and Scientific RealismUploaded byJohn Steff
- Digital Signal Processing Lab ManualUploaded byOmer Sheikh
- pre calculus dioso logarithmic activityUploaded byapi-310904676
- Use of Math Ma Ti Cal ModelsUploaded byHari Baskar
- Models.mems.MicrogripperUploaded byRodolfo Felipe
- FP 360 sc Oil in Water Monitoring Sensor User Manual.pdfUploaded byMiguel Jiménez Flores
- Leonardo Da Vinci's Solution to the Problem of the Pinhole CameraUploaded byGorka Etxague
- ISO 11846 Intergranular TestingUploaded byZHappy Feetz
- CSU HomeworkUploaded byNathan Denesha
- Technical DescriptionUploaded byAlyssa Fiorenza
- Unbiased Minimum-Variance Input and State Estimation for Linear Discrete-time SystemsUploaded byAmit Shukla
- Proteómica.pdfUploaded byMaurício Moreira
- Fluid Mechanics and Machinery 2E (Kothandaraman & Rudramoorthy)-14.pdfUploaded byajaykrishna_99
- Alternate to Ghat-ki-guni by Construction of Tunnel in Jhalana Hills JaipurUploaded byDevendra Sharma
- f201508151439617857.pdfUploaded byh_alimoham
- Voltage Instability Collapse an OverviewUploaded byMiguel Acb
- Step KineticsUploaded byaattish
- 2018 08 06 Morning ROS Introduction to URDFUploaded byBatuhan Toker
- 29977312Uploaded byshakir hussain
- Euclid - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded bySurya Bhupathi Raju
- Acacia Confusa extraction of DMT.pdfUploaded byPedro Rebrij
- PID ControllerUploaded byamitbslpawar
- Fletcher Brandon Lab1 Fall17Uploaded byjames
- 1678-4383-bjce-34-02-00541Uploaded bynay den
- Energy Level Structure and Transition ProbabilitiesUploaded byAngela Stefan
- A Note on Einstein Bergmann and the Fifth DimensionUploaded byForttos
- Leonid Dubrovinsky and Natalia Dubrovinskaia- Novel Superhard MaterialsUploaded byDrebuio
- 73 Application Constitutive Model Swelling RockUploaded byanalysethat
- stoichiometry labUploaded byapi-239430693