Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.iihe.edu.pk
009
Pakistan
Machine Tool
Factory (PMTF)
Internship Report
PMTF has rich experience in Designing and
Manufacturing of precision engineering goods and
its facilities include Designing, Machining,
Forging, Heat Treatment, Assembly, Die Casting
etc.
4
Indus Institute of Higher Education
Venue:
Dated:
12th April, 2009 to 25th April, 2009
Belongs to:
4
Forewords:
Introduction ……………………………………………………. 02
Forewords ……………………………………………………. 03
Introduction to PMTF……………………………………………. 05
Departments at PMTF……………………………………………. 06
Topics Covered
4
Pakistan Machine Tool Factory (Pvt) Ltd. (PMTF) is a
precision engineering goods manufacturing enterprise in
Pakistan, established in technical collaboration with M/s.
Oerlikon Buhrle & Co. of Switzerland who are the world's
renowned manufacturers of Machine Tools. The factory came
into regular production in 1971.
4
Departments Introduction:
Design Centre
Machining
Tool Room
Material Testing
Heat Treating
Forging
Machine Tool Rebuilding
Design Centre:
Computer Aided Design & Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) facilities
are installed for Product Design and Tools/Jigs/Fixtures Design
and CNC Shop in 1990. Engineering software from Computer
vision (USA) and Autodesk namely:
- CADDS 5
- Design View
- Personal Designer
- Personal Designer/Personal Machinist
- Micro draft
- Personal Data Extract
- Mechanical Desktop power pack (with Auto Cad)
are used for design of products, tools, jigs, fixtures, cutters,
forging & die casting dies, gears, equipments, mechanical
devices.
Machining:
The works facility consists of variety of conventional and CNC
machine tools capable of performing various machining
operations such as turning, planning, milling, drilling, jig
boring, thread grinding, deep hole drilling, gear hobbling,
4
shaping and shaving, gear grinding, spiral bevel gear cutting,
broaching to the close tolerances specified in the design. The
maximum machining capabilities are as follows:
Tool Room:
The factory has a fully equipped Tool Room facility capable of
manufacturing jigs & fixtures, special tools like drills, gauges,
cutters and holding devices, special high precision machine
tools like jig boring, thread grinding, die sinking, relieving
lathes, vertical copying lathes, precision milling machines and
special purpose tool grinding of Swiss and German origin
supplements the facility and ensures that all specifications
and tolerances essential for tool room accuracy is met. The
Tool Room is linked with Tool Design Section fully equipped
with computer Aided Design facilities and supported by
Metrology section located in same area for precise calibration
and control of tool room products. All recommended
international standards are followed for toolings.
4
Material Testing:
a. Metallographic:
Complete Evaluation of :
Macro and Micro Structure
Non - Metallic Inclusion & segregation
Case Hardening and Case Depth
Photo Micrograph of Structure
Failure Analysis
b. Mechanical Testing:
Facilities to determine:
Mechanical Properties
Stress - Strain
Tensile and Compressive Strength
Shear and Impact Test
c. Chemical Testing:
Complete Analysis of:
Metals and Alloys
Ferrous and Non Ferrous Elements
Paints, Chemicals, Ores, Oils Greases etc
d. Non-Destructive Testing:
Determination of:
Internal Cracks by Ultrasonic Testing
Surface Cracks by Magnaflux and Dye
- Penetration
Heat Treatment:
The Heat Treatment shop is the largest and the most well
equipped in the country. The equipment is of French, German
and Italian origin.
The Facilities has :
4
- For Carburizing and Case Hardening :
Five Sealed Quench Furnaces
Three Gas Fired Pit-type Muffle Furnaces
Two Rotary Hearth Furnaces with Quenching Press
Electrically Heated Tempering Furnace
Forging:
The Forging shop is equipped with two drop hammers of 3000
kg and 1500 kg Pneumatic hammers of 600 kg and 300 kg,
Trimming press of 320 tons and 1000 tons, Friction Screw
Press of 480 tons, Heating of stock for forging is done in rotary
hearth furnace. Furnace car-bottom type is installed for
normalizing the forged components. Removal of scales is done
in Tumbler & Table type shot blasting machines. The forge
shop is capable of production of forgings up to 20 kg and 200
mm in diameter.
Machine Rebuilding:
Machine Rebuilding is a comparatively new technology in the
industrially developed countries. It should not be mixed with
machine tool repair and maintenance and overhaul. The main
4
characteristic of Machine Rebuilding are:
Quality Control:
Inspection and Testing is carried out according to procedures
established for ISO 9001 Quality Assurance System. The
inspection activities are backed up with the facility for
calibration of measuring and testing devices.
MACHINE TOOLS:
1- Heavy duty & light duty Milling Machines(Horizontal,
Universal & Vertical)
2- Vertical Copying Milling & Boring Machines
3- Turret Milling Machine
4- Precision Centre Lathes
5- Universal Radial Drilling Machine (Portable)
6- Pantograph Engraving Machine
7- Special Purpose Machine Tools
8- Manual Arbor Press
TRANSMISSION:
1- Gear and Shafts for Agriculture Tractors like Massey
Ferguson (MF 240, MF 375),and Fiat
4
(Fiat 480, Fiat 640).
2- Traction Gears and Pinions for Locomotives
3- Gears for various Industrial applications
4- Components for Bedford Trucks & Buses etc.
DIE CAST COMPONENTS:
1- Aluminum Pressure Die Cast components for Honda
Motorcycle Model CD 70 & CG 125, and Suzuki Motorcycle;
Model A80.
2- Aluminum Pressure Die Cast components for Domestic
Appliances
3- Aluminum Pressure Die Cast components of Gas Meter for
Gas distribution industries.
4- Aluminum Pressure Die Cast components for Suzuki Car
Model SB 308
TEXTILE MACHINERY:
1- Ring Spinning Frame Model FA 506
MISCELLANEOUS:
1- Gears for various Industrial Applications.
2- Spares for various plants/machinery.
3- Machines / Equipments as per customer's design /
requirement.
4
Topics Covered:
N C & CNC
Tracer control:
The application of hydraulics to cam-based automation
resulted in tracing machines that used a stylus to trace a
template, such as the enormous Pratt & Whitney "Keller
Machine", which could copy templates several feet across.[1]
Another approach was "record and playback", pioneered at
General Motors (GM) in the 1950s, which used a storage
system to record the movements of a human machinist, and
then play them back on demand. Analogous systems are
common even today, notably the "teaching lathe" which gives
4
new machinists a hands-on feel for the process. None of these
were numerically programmable, however, and required a
master machinist at some point in the process, because the
"programming" was physical rather than numerical.
Parsons worries soon came true, and in 1949 the Air Force
arranged funding for Parsons to build his machines on his
own. Early work with Snyder Machine & Tool Corp proved that
the system of directly driving the controls from motors failed
to have the accuracy needed to set the machine for a
perfectly smooth cut. Since the mechanical controls did not
respond in a linear fashion, you couldn't simply drive it with a
certain amount of power, because the differing forces would
mean the same amount of power would not always produce
the same amount of motion in the controls. No matter how
many points you included, the outline would still be rough.
Enter MIT:
4
MIT's machine:
MIT fit gears to the various hand wheel inputs and drove them
with roller chains connected to motors, one for each of the
machine's three axes (X, Y and depth). The associated
controller consisted of five refrigerator-sized cabinets that,
together, were almost as large as the mill they were
connected to. Three of the cabinets contained the motor
controllers, one controller for each motor, the other two the
digital reading system.
The final cabinet held a clock that sent pulses through the
registers, compared them, and generated output pulses that
interpolated between the points. For instance, if the points
were far apart the output would have pulses with every clock
cycle, whereas closely spaced points would only generate
pulses after multiple clock cycles. The pulses are sent into a
summing register in the motor controllers, counting up by the
number of pulses every time they were received. The
summing registers were connected to a digital to analog
4
convertor that output increasing power to the motors as the
count in the registers increased.
The registers were decremented by encoders attached to the
motors and the mill itself, which would reduce the count by
one for every one degree of rotation. Once the second point
was reached the pulses from the clock would stop, and the
motors would eventually drive the mill to the encoded
position. Each 1 degree rotation of the controls produced a
0.0005 inch movement of the cutting head.. The programmer
could control the speed of the cut by selecting points that
were closer together for slow movements, or further apart for
rapid ones.
The system was publicly demonstrated in September 1952,
appearing in that month's Scientific American. MIT's system
was an outstanding success by any technical measure, quickly
making any complex cut with extremely high accuracy that
could not easily be duplicated by hand. However, the system
was terribly complex, including 250 vacuum tubes, 175 relays
and numerous moving parts, reducing its reliability in a
production setting. It was also very expensive, the total bill
presented to the Air Force was $360,000.14, $2,641,727.63 in
2005 dollars. Between 1952 and 1956 the system was used to
mill a number of one-off designs for various aviation firms, in
order to study their potential economic impact.
Proliferation of NC:
The Air Force funding for the project ran out in 1953, but
development was picked up by the Giddings and Lewis
Machine Tool Co. In 1955 many of the MIT team left to form
Concord Controls, a commercial NC company with Giddings'
backing, producing the Numericord controller. Numericord was
similar to the MIT design, but replaced the punch tape with a
magnetic tape reader that General Electric was working on.
The tape contained a number of signals of different phases,
4
which directly encoded the angle of the various controls. The
tape was played at a constant speed in the controller, which
set its half of the selsyns to the encoded angles while the
remote side was attached to the machine controls. Designs
were still encoded on paper tape, but the tapes were
transferred to a reader/writer that converted them into
magnetic form. The magtapes could then be used on any of
the machines on the floor, where the controllers were greatly
reduced in complexity. Developed to produce highly accurate
dies for an aircraft skinning press, the Numericord "NC5" went
into operation at G&L's plant at Fond du Lac, WI in 1955.
Monarch Machine Tool also developed an NC-controlled lathe,
starting in 1952. They demonstrated their machine at the
1955 Chicago Machine Tool Show, along with a number of
other vendors with punch card or paper tape machines that
were either fully developed or in prototype form. These
included Kearney & Trekker’s Milwaukee-Matic II that could
change its cutting tool under NC control.
4
factory floor and into the un-unionized white collar design
office.
CNC arrives:
4
APT was soon extended to include "real" curves in 2D-APT-II.
With its release, MIT reduced its focus on CNC as it moved into
CAD experiments. APT development was picked up with the
AIA in San Diego, and in 1962, to Illinois Institute of
Technology Research. Work on making APT an international
standard started in 1963 under USASI X3.4.7, but many
manufacturers of CNC machines had their own one-off
additions (like PRONTO), so standardization was not
completed until 1968, when there were 25 optional add-ins to
the basic system.
Just as APT was being released in the early 1960s, a second
generation of lower-cost transistorized computers was hitting
the market that were able to process much larger volumes of
information in production settings. This so lowered the cost of
implementing a NC system that by the mid 1960s, APT runs
accounted for a third of all computer time at large aviation
firms.
4
By 1970 there were a wide variety of CAD firms including
Intergraph, Applicon, Computer vision, Auto-troll Technology,
UGS Corp. and others, as well as large vendors like CDC and
IBM.
Proliferation of CNC
4
During the early 1970s the Western economies were mired in
slow economic growth and rising employment costs, and NC
machines started to become more attractive. The major U.S.
vendors were slow to respond to the demand for machines
suitable for lower-cost NC systems, and into this void stepped
the Germans. In 1979, sales of German machines surpassed
the U.S. designs for the first time. This cycle quickly repeated
itself, and by 1980 Japan had taken a leadership position, U.S.
sales dropping all the time. Once sitting in the #1 position in
terms of sales on a top-ten chart consisting entirely of U.S.
companies in 1971, by 1987 Cincinnati Milacron was in 8th
place on a chart heavily dominated by Japanese firms.
Many researchers have commented that the U.S. focus on
high-end applications left them in an uncompetitive situation
when the economic downturn in the early 1970s led to greatly
increased demand for low-cost NC systems. Unlike the U.S.
companies, who had focused on the highly profitable
aerospace market, German and Japanese manufacturers
targeted lower-profit segments from the start and were able
to enter the low-cost markets much more easily.
Today
4
The proliferation of CNC led to the need for new CNC
standards that were not encumbered by licensing or particular
design concepts, like APT. A number of different "standards"
proliferated for a time, often based around vector graphics
markup languages supported by plotters. One such standard
has since become very common, the "G-code" that was
originally used on Gerber Scientific plotters and then adapted
for CNC use. The file format became so widely used that it has
been embodied in an EIA standard. In turn, G-code was
supplanted by STEP-NC, a system that was deliberately
designed for CNC, rather than grown from an existing plotter
standard.
A more recent advancement in CNC interpreters is support of
logical commands, known as parametric programming.
Parametric programs include both device commands as well
as a control language similar to BASIC. The programmer can
make if/then/else statements, loops, subprogram calls,
perform various arithmetic, and manipulate variables to
create a large degree of freedom within one program. An
entire product line of different sizes can be programmed using
logic and simple math to create and scale an entire range of
parts, or create a stock part that can be scaled to any size a
customer demands.
As digital electronics has spread, CNC has fallen in price to the
point where hobbyists can purchase any number of small CNC
systems for home use. It is even possible to build your own.
Description:
4
Features:
System scale:
User interface:
4
PLCs may need to interact with people for the purpose of
configuration, alarm reporting or everyday control.
A Human-Machine Interface (HMI) is employed for this
purpose. HMIs are also referred to as MMIs (Man Machine
Interface) and GUI (Graphical User Interface).
A simple system may use buttons and lights to interact with
the user. Text displays are available as well as graphical touch
screens. More complex systems use a programming and
monitoring software installed on a computer, with the PLC
connected via a communication interface.
Communications:
4
PLC compared with other control systems:
4
Very complex process control, such as used in the chemical
industry, may require algorithms and performance beyond the
capability of even high-performance PLCs. Very high-speed or
precision controls may also require customized solutions; for
example, aircraft flight controls.
Programmable controllers are widely used in motion control,
positioning control and torque control. Some manufacturers
produce motion control units to be integrated with PLC so that
G-code (involving a CNC machine) can be used to instruct
machine movements.
PLCs may include logic for single-variable feedback analog
control loop, a "proportional, integral, derivative" or "PID
controller." A PID loop could be used to control the
temperature of a manufacturing process, for example.
Historically PLCs were usually configured with only a few
analog control loops; where processes required hundreds or
thousands of loops, a distributed control system (DCS) would
instead be used. As PLCs have become more powerful, the
boundary between DCS and PLC applications has become less
distinct.
PLCs have similar functionality as Remote Terminal Units. An
RTU, however, usually does not support control algorithms or
control loops. As hardware rapidly becomes more powerful
and cheaper, RTUs, PLCs and DCSs are increasingly beginning
to overlap in responsibilities, and many vendors sell RTUs with
PLC-like features and vice versa. The industry has
standardized on the IEC 61131-3 functional block language for
creating programs to run on RTUs and PLCs, although nearly
all vendors also offer proprietary alternatives and associated
development environments.
Example:
4
| Low Level High Level Fill Valve |
|------[/]------|------[/]----------------------(OUT)---------|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| Fill Valve | |
|------[ ]------| |
| |
| |
Programming:
History
Origin:
The PLC was invented in response to the needs of the
American automotive manufacturing industry. Programmable
controllers were initially adopted by the automotive industry
where software revision replaced the re-wiring of hard-wired
control panels when production models changed.
Before the PLC, control, sequencing, and safety interlock logic
for manufacturing automobiles was accomplished using
hundreds or thousands of relays, cam timers, and drum
sequencers and dedicated closed-loop controllers. The
process for updating such facilities for the yearly model
change-over was very time consuming and expensive, as the
relay systems needed to be rewired by skilled electricians.
In 1968 GM Hydramatic (the automatic transmission division
of General Motors) issued a request for proposal for an
electronic replacement for hard-wired relay systems.
The winning proposal came from Bedford Associates of
Bedford, Massachusetts. The first PLC, designated the 084
because it was Bedford Associates' eighty-fourth project, was
the result. Bedford Associates started a new company
4
dedicated to developing, manufacturing, selling, and servicing
this new product: Modicum, which stood for Modular Digital
Controller. One of the people who worked on that project was
Dick Morley, who is considered to be the "father" of the PLC.
The Modicum brand was sold in 1977 to Gould Electronics,
and later acquired by German Company AEG and then by
French Schneider Electric, the current owner.
One of the very first 084 models built is now on display at
Modicum’s headquarters in North Andover, Massachusetts. It
was presented to Modicum by GM, when the unit was retired
after nearly twenty years of uninterrupted service. Modicum
used the 84 moniker at the end of its product range until the
984 made its appearance.
The automotive industry is still one of the largest users of
PLCs.
Development:
Programming:
4
Early PLCs, up to the mid-1980s, were programmed using
proprietary programming panels or special-purpose
programming terminals, which often had dedicated function
keys representing the various logical elements of PLC
programs. Programs were stored on cassette tape cartridges.
Facilities for printing and documentation were very minimal
due to lack of memory capacity. The very oldest PLCs used
non-volatile magnetic core memory.
Functionality:
Hydraulic cylinder:
In case the retracted length of the cylinder is too long for the
cylinder to be build in the structure. In this case telescopic
cylinders can be used. One has to realize that for simple
pushing applications telescopic cylinders might be available
easily; for higher forces and/or double acting cylinders, they
must be designed especially and are very expensive. If
hydraulic cylinders are only used for pushing and the piston
rod is brought in again by other means, one can also use
plunger cylinders. Plunger cylinders have no sealing over the
piston, or the piston does not exist. This means that only one
oil connection is necessary. In general the diameter of the
plunger is rather large compared with a normal piston
cylinder, because this large area is needed.
Whereas a hydraulic motor will always leak oil, a hydraulic
cylinder does not have a leakage over the piston nor over the
cylinder head sealing, so that there is no need for a
mechanical brake.
Hydraulic motor:
4
The hydraulic motor is the rotary counterpart of the hydraulic
cylinder.
Conceptually, a hydraulic motor should be interchangeable
with hydraulic pump, because it performs the opposite
function -- much as the conceptual DC electric motor is
interchangeable with a DC electrical generator. However,
most hydraulic pumps cannot be used as hydraulic motors
because they cannot be back driven. Also, a hydraulic motor
is usually designed for the working pressure at both sides of
the motor.
Hydraulic valves:
Pneumatics
Comparison to hydraulics:
Advantages of pneumatics:
4
Compressed Gas can be stored, allowing the use of machines
when electrical power is lost.
Safety
Very small fire hazards (compared to hydraulic oil).
Machines can be designed to be overload safe.
Advantages of hydraulics:
Pneumatic Logic:
Successes
4
There were many successes, both on our side and on the
company side. Personally the following is what we succeeded
on:
Short Comings
There weren’t many short comings since as an intern we were
given a lot of support by our supervisors and other fellow
staff. Therefore the major short comings that I did face were: