. 2006. . 6. . . . , .

1/2
3

5
6
7

9
10

. .. (18881978) // . XX . , 1991.
. 388.
.: .. // .
. 1971.
101/102. (IIIIV). . 61.
.. : . , 1993. . 65.
. . 192.
.. XIX
XX . .
., 2000.
. // ..
. , 1992. . 2.
.. . ., 1991.
. 470.
..
. , 1997. . 11.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

..
// . 1932. 35 (.). . 70.
.. . ., 1990. . 433.
.. :
2 . --, I964. . 1. . 113.
.. // : . ., 1993. . 2223.
.: ..
? // . 1996. 2. C. 51.
..
// . 1932. 35 (.). . 70.
. . ., 1997. . 69.
.. ?
// . 1996. 2. . 51.
.
.. // : . ., 1993. . 18.
.. // :
. ., 1993. . 30.

111

..
,

E-mail: KosyhinVG@rambler.ru


.
- , , ,

.

.
,
,

.
Being in the Mirror of Intranslatability
V.G. Kosykhin
The article deals with the problem of interpretative transformation
of Heideggers understanding of being in postmodern thought. This
transfotmation takes somewhat unpredictable conceptual forms as, for
example, in Derridas ontologies of differance and supplement and in
Baudrillards ontology of branchments. The postmodern investigation
of Heideggers notion of being has changed our understanding
of main ontological approaches and problems. The aim of modern
ontology is not to solve, but to pose a problem, and even an ontological
statement itself is understood in postmodern thought as a starting point
for problematic continuation.

, , ,
,
. .. , 2006

. ,

,

?

,
,
,
.

- .


postmodernit , -
,
.
.

, ,


.

.. .

, , ,
, ,
.
,
,

( ,
) ( ,
).

.
,

(,
) , ,
.
, ,
,

.

, ,
.

( )

,
.
,
.

, ,
, ,
. , ,
,
. ,

. ,
,

, ,
.
,
.


.

. :
? :
,

. , , .
, ,
-, .



esse?
. ,
.

, ,
1.
:

,
, ,
, , ,
, ? ,
,

?
,
,
, ,
,

.
,

,
, , ,
, ,
,
. ,
,
,
, ,
- ,
,


,
.
,


. . ,
,
,
,
.
15

 . 2006. . 6. . . . , . 1/2

,
.
,
, ,
, .
(

), ,
.
, , .


(
), ,
,
.

, .
, ,

,
,
.
, ,
, ,
<>
,
,
. .
(,
)2.

, , ,
,
, : ,
. , ,
, <>
, ,
.
, ,
<> , ,
,

. , <>
<>
, ,
,
,
<>

, ,
, .
, ;
, : , ,
. ,
, , , ,
3. , ,
, ,
,
16

.
,

. ,
,
, homo rationalis.


. ,
,

,
.


, , , 486 :
, , ,
, ;
, ..4.
,

,
.
XX
, ,

( )
.
,
,
, (
)
,
. -
,
. ,
, ,
( ), -,
,
, .
, ,
. ,

,
,

.. .

. -, ,

,
, ,
/,
/, .
/
, , ,
Dasein/, .
Dasein,

Dasein.
Dasein, Existentia.
Dasein, ,
[] ,

(Dasein) . Dasein
. Dasein,
,
,
. -
Dasein -
- : , Dasein,

,
.

(Dasein) - ,
,
(Ereignis), . ,
(
, ,
) ,


.
, ,

, - ,
- (Ereignis).
-

, ,
,
.
-
(Ereignis) , , ,
:
. ,
,
, . ,

/
Difference (), Supplement () , Branchement ()
.
, (Ereignis),
.
, , -
, -, ,
, .
-

,
, (
),
.

(
) .
/

.
.
(
. . ) ,
,
, .
,
,
, , postmodernit,
.
,

:
.


,
17

 . 2006. . 6. . . . , . 1/2

.
.

,
.
,
(:
, ).
, . ,
, , .

1
2
3
4

. : .
., 1993. . 3233.
. .
, 1986. . 115.
. . 116117.
. : . ., 1995. . 226

165

..
,

E-mail: MalkinaSM@rambler.ru
,
. ,
. .
,
: , .
The Critics of Metaphysics and Logocentrism as the
Foundations of Interpretative Strategies of Deconstruction
S.M. Malkina
The article is dedicated to analysis of the notion of logocentrism which
is used for deconstruction of metaphysics. Nonclassic conception of
sign, formed in philosophy of J. Derrida, is researching. This puts
methodological foundation for interpretative strategies which can be
used for any kind of texts: philosophical, literary and sociocultural.

. . , ,
, , ,
, ,


. , .. ,
,
1.
.. , 2006

. ,
(, ,
,
) :
1. ,

;
2. , ,

( )
, ()

3. , 2.
-
, .
, ,

3. ()
, .
, ,
, , , ,
, .
(, ..) ,

, ; Versammlung,