I have a question regarding the intent/philosophy related to the design of suppo rted cone roofs in API 650.

The specific question is regarding design of the roof for suction (uplift) force s from wind. I see that the roof plate is not normally welded to the supporting structure and I am interested in understanding how the roof carries the loading to the shell. Is it assumed/tested that the roof plate will simply deflect enoug h to carry the wind loads via membrane stresses to the perimeter? If so, are the any practical diameter limits? Are their concerns with impact loading on the ro of structure as the plate vibrates due to variable wind suction pressures? I am asking these questions as the Engineering Representative for an Owner purch asing the tank. I just want to be sure that we do not have issues with the roof during a wind event. Any assistance provided would be greatly appreciated. If you are concerned about uplift, it is permissible to weld the roof plate to t he supporting structure. If you do this, your roof cannot be considered frangibl e. For many owners, frangibility is important from a safety aspect. The choice m ust be made as to whether roof frangibility is required or the roof can be suppo rted in the uplift condition The roof would have to carry the uplift forces via membrane stresses to the peri meter. The slope of the roof aids this. Small tanks (subjective) are not able to have frangible roofs, so are not negati vely affected by having their supporting structures welded to the roof plate. Of course, these tanks often require no supporting structure at all. I believe the effect of impact loading would be covered by the required live loa d rating of the roof. API 650 no longer requires you to consider uplift for supported cone roofs. Thousands have been in service for decades without failure from wind load. I think you can rest easy.