Everything in debate is about relative risk callas- relatively everything is impact calculus DA is about the comparison of action and

nonaction K is about impact and specify T two worlds on how debate would look Dont say a word without some sense of impacts Evidence comparison The most basic form of mpx calc We dont take risk from people who dont seem as qualified to talk about shit Being assertive makes it easier to lead the judge and can have change the way the judge looks at the evidence Date is important-post date o Key for politics and things like UQ o Need to explain what happened between the two times o Doesnt matter when the warrant is structural Claim o Descriptive-it describes the SQ Snapshoot of the SQ o Predictive- something is going to happen Takes into account other factors o Prescriptive-why something should happen o Plan v. CP Point out that we are the only ones with a descriptive Author and source o Subject specific expertise o Academic qualifications o Is it peer reviewed? Takes a few years to be reviewed o Blogs Fatest editorial in the world people will call you out in a few seconds Look up o Ezea Klein-economic o Electopnatz o Nate silver-538 campain o Monkey cage o Peter sandman Mpx calc Wont have a undisputed impact Need things like T is more important than other Connect the dot for the judge in a comparative manner P M T T/C-terms of terminal impact

 Acess their impacts use internal links too gain access K-predictions bad winning it in abstract does not mean shit specific reasons why the aff scenarios are bad predictions terminal evidence predictions