Insert Manuscript S title here Literature

Review A ssignment ELF Assessment Rubric

Name:______________________________________________________________________
Category Criterion Introduction A. Distinguished between what has been done in the field and what needs to be done B. Placed the research in the historical context of the field C. Placed the topic or problem in the broader Scholarly literature Problem Statement D. Rationalized the practical significance of the research problem E. Rationalized the scholarly significance of the problem Methodology F. Justified criteria for inclusion and exclusion G. Acquired and enhanced the subject vocabulary Synthesis H. Articulated important variables and phenomena relevant to the topic I. Synthesized and gained a new perspective on the literature J. Identified the main methodologies and research techniques that have been used in the field, and their advantages and disadvantages K. Related ideas and theories in the field to research methodologies. 0 Did not distinguish what has and has not been done before History of topic not discussed Topic not placed in broader scholarly literature Practical significance of research not discussed Scholarly significance of research not discussed Did not discuss the criteria for inclusion or exclusion Key vocabulary not discussed Key variables and phenomena not discussed Accepted literature at face value Research methods not discussed Research methods not discussed 1 Discussed what has and has not been done Some mention of history of topic Some discussion of broader scholarly literature Practical significance discussed Scholarly significance discussed Discussed the literature included and excluded Key vocabulary defined

REST FORM
2 Critically examined the state of the field Critically examined history of topic Topic clearly situated in broader scholarly literature Critiqued appropriateness of research methods to warrant claims Critiqued scholarly significance of research Justified inclusion and exclusion of literature Discussed and resolved ambiguities in definitions Noted ambiguities in literature and proposed new relationships Offered new perspective Critiqued research methods Critiqued appropriateness of research methods to warrant claims Parallels and converses support the goals of the research synthesis Well developed, coherent

Reviewed relationships among key variables and phenomena Some critique of literature Some discussion of research methods used to produce claims Some discussion of appropriateness of research methods to warrant claims Some discussion of parallels and converses

Conclusions

L. Draws parallels and converses that connect to the goals of the research synthesis

Parallels and converses not discussed

Writing Quality Rhetoric M. Was written with a coherent, clear structure that supported the review N. APA 6th edition formatting guidelines are implemented effectively Poorly conceptualized, haphazard Some coherent structure

APA Format

Formatting structures such as headings, margins, citations etc. are not followed Lacks one to one correspondence and citations used inappropriately

APA citations & references

O. References and citations are implemented effectively throughout manuscript

Some but not all formatting structures such as headings, margins, citations etc. are followed Lacks one to one correspondence or citations used inappropriately

All formatting structures such as headings, margins, citations etc. are followed Exhibits one to one correspondence and citations used appropriately

Adapted from Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291-302.

Total 0