Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
and
Readiness
NCLB
Primary Goal: to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology in elementary schools and secondary schools
Performance Descriptions
I. Early Tech II. Developing Tech
Point Structure
I. Early Tech 68 points 914 points II. Developing Tech
1520 points
2124 points
20122013
TL1
TL2 TL3
TL4 TL5
Patterns of classroom use Frequency/Design of Instructional Setting Content Area Connections Technology Applications (TA) TEKS Implementation Student Mastery of Technology Applications
3 3 3 3 3 2 17
3 3 3 3 3 2 17
3 3 3 2 3 2 16
EP1
EP2
EP3
3 3 2 2 3 1 14
3 2 2 2 3 2 14
2 2 2 2 3 2 13
Capabilities of Educators Access to Professional EP4 Development Levels of Understanding & EP5 Patterns of Use Professional Dev. for EP6 Online Learning Totals Developing Tech
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
3 3 3
3 2 3
3 2 2
3
3
3
3 2 16
3
3 3 15
Budget Leadership & Support for L6 Online Learning Totals Advanced Tech
3 18
Students per Computer Internet Access Connectivity Speed Other Classroom Technology Technical Support Local Area Network Wide Area Network Distance Learning Capacity
3 4 3 2 4 3 19
3 4 2 4 4 4 21
2 3 2 2 3 2 14
17
Advanced Tech
17
Advanced Tech
16
Advanced Tech
II
14
14
13
III
18
16
15
IV
19
21
Target Tech
14
3 Year Overview
What Happened?
Are results reflective of actual events?
Trigger Events
#1: In October of 2012, the District Vice President of Educational Technology resigned.
Trigger Events
#2: Layoffs, no funding, grant request rejected for 1st time, no leadership at District and State levels
Trigger Events
#3: Those few teachers who had resisted change took the opportunity to gather more teacher and parental support to oppose technology.
Trigger Events
#4: Events at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012 took a toll on teacher morale; teachers were vulnerable.
Trigger Events
#5: New technology received in 2011 was not compatible with browsers in old operating systems, and district would not allow for upgrades.
Trigger Events
#6: Teachers frustrated; some asked for resignation of Technology Specialist and end to technology programs.
I want to do new things, but I just dont have time to keep learning and troubleshooting when things go wrong.
The kids want it, but Im not sure its good for the kids. Kids get too much screen time. I disagree with the directives to add more technology. We have tried and trusted methodologies for teaching children that we know work. Why change? Kids can play with computers at home.
Analysis
The five roles outlined by Phillip C. Schlecthy (1993)as relevant in educational reform can clearly be identified in the last three years at Bryker Woods.
Path to Change
Trailblazers
Pioneers
Settlers Stay-at-Homes
Saboteurs
Recommendations
Professional development is critical. This needs to come from the State or District level so teachers understand this is not one person wanting to change one school. District/state needs to follow through with consistent funding so that the pieces of a longterm plan are all provided, and schools arent left with a partially funded, dysfunctional operation School leadership needs to support Technology Specialist so that initiatives are not weakened by 12 naysayers
On Track
Technology Specialist still on board
Credits
Austin Independent School District logo [Web graphic]. Retrieved from: http://archive.austinisd.org/schools/details.phtml?id=054/ Bryker Woods paw print graphic [Web graphic]. Retrieved from: http://archive.austinisd.org/schools/details.phtml?id=054/ Schlechty, P. C. (1993) On the frontier of school reform with trailblazers, pioneers, and settlers. Journal of Staff Development, 14(4), 4651. http://www.timeandlearning.org/files/P.611_Article_frontier_of_school_reform.pdf Texas Education Agency, Instructional Materials and Educational Technology. (2006). The Texas campus star chart, pp. 1114. Retrieved from website: http://starchart.epsilen.com/docs/TxCSC.pdf U.S. Department of Education, Elementary & Secondary Education. (2004). Part d Enhancing education through technology (Sec. 2402). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg34.html