Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

SBM Scoring Matrix

As of 2013

Name of School:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%) Thematic Performance Area Indicator Access Enrolment Increase % of Inc. (45%) SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: SY 2013-14: Ave. of Increase: Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR): % of Dec. (25%) SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Decrease:: Completion rate (CR): % of Inc. SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase: Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): % of Inc. SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase: Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): NAT MPS SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase: :

Division:
Rating & Equivalent Points 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase Baseline: 7.06 1 Marginal: At least 25% decrease 2 Average: At least 50% decrease 3 High: Has 0 DR Baseline: 75% 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase Baseline: 76% 1 Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase Computation Results

____ x 0.45=

____ x 0.25=

Quality (30%)

% of Inc. 1 Marginal : 26 50% 2 Average : 51 75% 3 High : 76 100% Sub-total ____ x 0.30=

Interpretation

Good Better Best

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description 0.50 1.49 Good 1.50 2.49 Better 2.50 3.00 Best Note: Only schools having a performance Improvement of Better can apply to the Division for SBM Validation. Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%) SBM Principles Leadership Curriculum & Learning Accountability Resource Management Subtotal Interpretation Weight 30% 30% 25% 15% 100% : Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle Computation _____ x 0.3 _____ x 0.3 _____ x 0.25 _____ x 0.15 Good Better Best Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Good Better Best Results

Legend:

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating Areas A. Performance Improvement B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) TOTAL Interpretation : Developing Maturing Advanced (Level I) (Level II) (Level III) Weight 60% 40% 100% Computation Results

Description of SBM Level of Practice: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Developing Maturing Advanced

Вам также может понравиться