Interior Design; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts
A1. lnLake 8asellne uaLa A2. lnLake 8evlew 81. lall Mld-1erm LvenL uaLa uevelopmenL 82. lall Mld-1erm LvenL uaLa 8evlew C1. lall Lnd-1erm uaLa uevelopmenL C2. lall Lnd-1erm uaLa 8evlew u1. Sprlng Mld- 1erm LvenL uaLa uevelopmenL u2. Sprlng Mld- 1erm LvenL uaLa 8evlew L1. Sprlng Lnd- 1erm uaLa uevelopmenL L2. Sprlng Lnd- 1erm uaLa 8evlew l. Annual AssessmenL 8evlew & 8eporL on llndlngs & Acuons 1aken 8ased Cn SLudenL Learnlng CuLcomes Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Interior Design; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts SOA Degree Program (Music Education):
A1. Intake Data (Audition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date: Fall 2014 Activity: Discuss with potential students, who are visiting the Department, their understanding of the interior design profession. Method of Documentation Used: Notes taken on students knowledge of the responsibilities of interior designers, with a rubric to evaluate depth and breadth of knowledge. Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals A2. Intake Review (Degree Program Faculty): Date of Review: Fall 2014 Data Used: Notes with rubric from above Key Observations: Awareness of profession, interior design vs. interior decorating, Actions Taken: ID profession package for admissions counselors Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals B1. Fall Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date of Review: October 2014 Activity: Discuss with potential students, who come for admissions open house, their understanding of the interior design profession. Method of Documentation Used: Notes taken on students knowledge of the responsibilities of interior designers, using a rubric to evaluate depth and breadth of knowledge. Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals B2. Fall Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other) Date of Review: October 2014 Data Used: Information gathered from notes and rubric Key Observations: Awareness of profession, interior design vs. interior decorating, Actions Taken: ID profession package for admissions counselors Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes, Admissions Counselor assigned by April Lewis Responsible Party: Ruth Beals C1. Fall End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Fall End Term Report, Surveys, External Reviews, Course Evaluations, Other) Date of Review: October 2014 Activity: Discuss with potential students, who come for admissions open house, their understanding of the interior design profession. Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Interior Design; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts Method of Documentation Used: Notes taken on students knowledge of the responsibilities of interior designers, using a rubric to evaluate depth and breadth of knowledge. Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals C2. Fall End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other) Date of Review: December 2014 Data Used: Information gathered from notes and rubric throughout semester Key Observations: Awareness of profession, interior design vs. interior decorating, Actions Taken: ID profession presentation for admissions counselors Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes, Admissions Counselor assigned by April Lewis Responsible Party: Ruth Beals D1. Spring Mid-Term Data Development (Recital, Performance, Exhibition, Portfolio Review, Other): Date: Early April, 2015 Activity: Collect course exercises Method of Documentation Used: Exercise Evaluations and Exercises Participants: Ruth Beals Responsible Party: Ruth Beals D2. Spring Mid-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, External Reviewer, Accreditation Body, Other) Date of Review: Mid April, Spring 2015 Data Used: Report on evaluations above Key Observations: Understanding of design theories: aesthetics, human behavior Actions Taken: Advisement of students, integration with future course projects Participants: Ruth Beals and Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals E1. Spring End-Term Data Development (Intake Report, Event #1 Report, Surveys, External Review Report, Course Evaluations, Other) Date(s): Final week, Spring 2015 Activity: Collect final projects and observe final presentation Method of Documentation Used: Evaluations, QEP Speaking Participants: Ruth Beals Responsible Party: Ruth Beals E2. Spring End-Term Data Review (Degree Program Faculty, Guest Faculty, Professional Experts, Institutional Research Office, Other) Date of Review: Final week, Spring 2015 Data Used: Report from evaluations and QEP above Annual Assessment Plan Timeline & Actions Interior Design; Department of Art & Design; School of the Arts Key Observations: Improvement in understanding scope of profession, application of design theory Actions Taken: Review and note course content against student learning per observations Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals F. Annual Assessment Review & Report on Findings & Actions Taken (Degree Program Faculty, Dept/School Faculty, Guest Date Date of Review: Mid-May, 2015 Data Used: Reports from end of semester Fall and Spring Key Observations: Growth of knowledge of profession and design theory Actions Taken: Confirmation of course content, review of education packets for admissions Curriculum: Adjust course content for improved learning Staffing: --- Facilities: Review for optimal type of room and need for computer integration Operations: Procedures/Processes: Participants: Ruth Beals, Jane Hughes Responsible Party: Ruth Beals