Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
profdraboushook@gmail.com
:
.
.
.
:
.
.
. %6
%5
.
-1
.
][7-1
.
.
.
-2
. )(1
) (2
2
7 ) (3
.
) (1
][8
Small gate
(To Khulais (7 km
P1
Makkah
Madina
Highway
P6
P2
P4
P5
P3
) (2
7
) (3 )
2 3 (
-3
0.075 ) 200(
][9,10
:
= % 15 = % 40 = 5.5 = 604
)( 4 3 2 :.
)( 3.50 :.
)( 10 8 : 15.
-4
:
-1 % 6
.%90
-2
.
35 2 / 24 2 / 6
% ).(4
-3
).(5
40
35
Dry Activation
25
20
Wet Activation
15
30
10
0
13
11
12
10
Sodium Carbonate %
) (4 ) (
40
35
Hand Grinding
Ring Grinding
25
Stamp Grinding
20
15
30
10
0
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
)Time (min
) (5 ) %6
(
-4
) (6
.
.
40
35
Ball Mill
25
Rod Mill
20
15
30
10
0
8
)Time (Hours
) (6 %6
-
).(7
7
40
35
Fine Grinding
25
20
15
Coarse Grinding
30
10
0
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
)Time (min
) (7 %6
-8 ) (
).(9 8
40
35
Egyptian Bentonite
30
20
15
Saudi Bentonite
25
10
0
60
50
40
30
20
10
% of Commercial Bentonite
) (8
) (
60
55
Egyptian Bentonite
50
45
35
30
Egyptian Bentonite +
6%Na2Co3
25
20
Saudi Bentonite +
6%Na2Co3
15
10
5
0
60
50
40
30
20
10
% of Commercial Bentonite
) (9
%6
-5
9
Saudi Bentonite
40
-
:
-
%8
.
.
.
-2
2 .
0.075 .
10
0.075 .
8
.
.
) :(10
-
% 6
% 5
.
11
50
45
2% Eg. Bent.
40
5% Eg. Bent.
30
10% Egy. Bent.
25
2% Sa. Bent.
20
15
5% Sa. Bent.
35
10
10% Sa. Bent.
5
0
9
% of Sodium Carbonate
) (10
- % 90
% 80
) .(11
.
12
45
S1
40
35
S2
S3
25
20
S4
15
S5
30
10
S6
5
0
4
)Time (HRS
) (11 ) %5
%6 + (
-
1 .
) (12
.
13
30
28
27
26
29
25
S6
S5
S4
S3
S1
S2
) (12
) %5 %6 + (
-6
14
][15-11
:
)
(.
:
-
.
) (2 1 )
.(13
) (1 )
Khulais
(Mechanical
)Activated
Khulais
(Manual
)Activated
40
280
28
Khulais
)(Natural
Commercial
Saudi
Wyoming
)(USA
14
90
22
50
425
33
65
505
35
72
67.2
55
82.5
88
630
15
1.06
588
20
1.04
462
38
1.02
693
12.5
1.07
735
12
1.1
43
350
30
15
45
40
30
34
37
( 2)
( )
Types of
Bentonite
Wyoming
(USA)
Commercial
Saudi
Khulais
(Natural)
Khulais
(Manual
Activated)
Khulais
(Mechanical
Activated)
% of
Relative
Activation
For
Free Swell
% of
Relative
Activation
For
Plasticity
Index
% of
Relative
Activation
For
Cation
Exchange
Capacity
% of
Relative
Activation
For Filtration
Loss
% of
Relative
Activation
For
Density
% of
Relative
Activation
For
apparent
Viscosity
100
100
100
100
100
100
78
84
94
96
78
89
22
18
63
32
22
67
62
64
80
60
44
76
66
69
86
80
67
82
600
% of Activation
For apparent
Viscosity
500
% of Relative ativation;
% of Activation
For density
400
% of Activation
For Filtration Loss
300
200
% of Activation
For Cation
Exchange Capacity
100
% of Activation
For Plasticity Index
0
Wyoming (USA)
Khulais (Manual
Activated)
Khulais
(Mechanical
Activated)
% Activation
for Free Swell
( 13)
( )
16
% 75
.
-7
:
-1 0.075.
-2 %6 .
-3 % 5
.
-4
.
:
17
% 66 .
% 69 .
% 86
.
% 80
. % 67
. % 82
. %75
.
References:
[1] nal, M. 2007. Swelling and cation exchange capacity relationship for the samples obtained
from a bentonite by acid activations and heat treatments. Applied Clay Science 20, 1-7.
[2] nal, M., Sarkaya, Y., Alemdarolu, T., 2002. The effect of acid activation on some
physicochemical properties of a bentonite. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 26, 409416
[3] Christidis, G.E., Scott, P.W., Dunham, A.C., 1997. Acid activation and bleaching capacity of
bentonites from the islands of Milos and Chios Aegean, Greece. Applied Clay Science 12, 329
374
[4] Hassan, M.; Abdelkhalek,N. and Abdelrazek, M., 1997. Evaluation the role of beneficiation and
activation of an Egyptian bentonite ore. Proc. of Fifth International Conference on Petroleum,
Mining & Metallurgical Engineering, Suez Canal University, 108-126
[5] Spencer, C.H.; Le Berre, P. and Pasquet, J.F., 1986. Additional drilling and
industrial suitability tests in the Khulais bentonite deposit: Saudi Arabian
Deputy for Mineral Resources , BRGM-OF-08-1,40p
[6] Ai-Zahrani, Al- Asahrani, S. and Ai-Tawil, Y.A, 2000. Study on the activation of Saudi natural
bentonite, part 11. Journal of King Saudi University, Engineering Sciences, Issue 2- Vol. 13.
[7] Christidis, G.E; P. W. Scott, P.W. and Dunham, A.C. 1997. Acid activation and bleaching
capacity of bentonites from the islands of Milos and Chios, Aegean, Greece. Applied Clay
Science, Volume 12, Issue 4, October 1997, Pages 329-347.
[8] DGMR, 1994. Mineral Resources of Saudi Arabia Directorate General of Mineral Resources,
Saudi Arabia, Special Publication, Sp2: 27-29.
[9] Naim M., 2004. Hydraulic, Diffusion, and Retention Characteristics of Inorganic Chemicals in
Bentonite. Ph.d. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of
Engineering, University of South Florida, 251pp.
[10] ASTM D 5890-02, Standard Test Method for Swell Index of Clay Mineral Component of
Geosynthetic Clay Liners, Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2002, Vol. 04.13, American
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
[11] Wersin, P., Curti, E., Appelo, C.A.J., 2004. Modeling bentonitewater interactions at high
solid/liquid ratios: swelling and diffuse double layer effects. Applied Clay Science 26, 249257.
[12] ASTM D 4318-00 (2000) Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity
Index of Soils, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.08, American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia, PA
18
[13] Bujdak, J., Janek, M., Madejova, J., Komadel, P., 2001. Methylene Blue Interactions with
Reduced-Charge Smectites, Clays and Clay Minerals, vol.49, no.3, pp.244-254, Jun 2001.
[14] Long, M.B. 2000. Guide to Specfication Preperation for Slurry Walls and Clay Liners,
Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals and Geology, Denver,
Colorado.
[15] API, American Petroleum Institute (1990), Standard Procedures for Field Testing Water-Based
Drilling Fluids, Specification API 13B-1, Washington, DC.
19
20