Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
.2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RH.11-12.7 Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, as well as in words) in order to address a question or solve a problem.
Arizona Content Standards: Concept 7 PO.3 F-Economic, social, and cultural changes transformed the U.S. into a world power, Analyze events which caused a transformation of the United States during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: World War I (e.g., League of Nations, Isolationism) Concept 8 PO 2 A, C, E, F- Domestic and world events, economic issues, and political conflicts redefined the role of government in the lives of U.S. citizens, Describe the impact of American involvement in World War II: movement away from isolationism, homefront transformations in the roles of women and minorities, war mobilization ( e.g., Native American Code-Talkers, minority participation in military units, media portrayal), turning points such as Pearl Harbor, D-Day, Hiroshima/Nagasaki
Rubric for Pins: Each weeks pins are worth 20 points. The total assignment is worth 80 points. The better you do on this portion of the assignment, the easier the essay will be.
10 points 4 new photos 8 complete sentences relating photos to an essential question 8 points 3 new photos 6 complete sentences relating photos to an essential question 6 points 2 new photos 4 complete sentences relating photos to an essential question 4 points 1 new photo 2 complete sentence relating photos to an essential question 0 points No new photos No complete sentences
Rubric for essay: The rubric will be the same as the one used for other writing assignments.
Construct Measured Comprehension of Key Ideas and Details Score Point 4 The student response provides an accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly and inferentially and cites convincing textual evidence to support the analysis, showing full comprehension of complex ideas expressed in the text(s). The student response addresses the prompt and provides effective and comprehensive development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements by using clear and convincing reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is consistently appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience. Score Point 3 The student response provides an accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly and inferentially and cites textual evidence to support the analysis, showing extensive comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s). The student response addresses the prompt and provides effective development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements by using clear reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is largely appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience. Score Point 2 The student response provides a mostly accurate analysis of what the text says explicitly or inferentially and cited textual evidence, shows a basic comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s). Score Point 1 The student response provides a minimally accurate analysis of what the text says and cited textual evidence, shows limited comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s). Score Point 0 The student response provides an inaccurate analysis or no analysis of the text, showing little to no comprehension of ideas expressed in the text(s).
The student response addresses the prompt and provides some development of the claim, topic and/or narrative elements by using some reasoning, details, text-based evidence, and/or description; the development is somewhat appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience.
The student response addresses the prompt and develops the claim, topic and/or narrative elements minimally by using limited reasoning, details, text-based evidence and/or description; the development is limited in its appropriateness to the task, purpose, and/or audience.
The student response is underdeveloped and therefore inappropriate to the task, purpose, and/or audience.