Annotated Bibliography "Americapedia." Bill of Rights Institute First Amendment Freedom of Speech 1791 Bill of Rights Institute Comments.

Bill of Rights Institute, 2010. Web. 18 Dec. 2013. <http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapediabill-of-rights/first-amendment/freedom-of-speech/>. The source goes more into earlier cases regarding Freedom of Speech. The author is trying to describe to the audience Freedom of Speech during the 1900s. The intended audience is historians. The source emphasizes a few court cases in the 1900s regarding Freedom of Speech. The author assumes the audience is trying to learn more about Freedom of Speech. There does not appear to be any bias in the source. The source has omitted very early and very recent court cases. The evidence supports the authors main points.

Barger, Keane A. "Be A Liar Or You're Fired! First Amendment Protection For Public Employees Who Object To Their Employer's Criminal Demands." Vanderbilt Law Review 66.5 (2013): 1541. MainFile. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. Employees are not as well protected under free speech as they think. Inform the readers of the plight of employees in free speech court cases. Public employees and other citizens protected under the First Amendment. The article emphasizes freedom of speech in the workplace. The author assumes the audience agrees with him. Yes, the bias is for the employees. No obvious omissions. The authors main points are supported by the evidence.

Carroll, Courtney. Violation of Constitutional Rights. Freedom of Speech and the First

Amendment. Violation of Constitutional Rights, 10 Feb. 2012. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. <http://blogs.longwood.edu/courtneycarroll/2012/02/10/freedom-of-speech-and-the-firstamendment/>. The main idea is the meaning of free speech. The author is trying to convey his interpretation of the First Amendment. The authors intended audience is the American people. The idea that free speech is not anything that can come out of your mouth is emphasized. The author assumes the audience has read the Constitution. There is no bias nor slant in the source. There are no obvious omissions. The evidence clearly supports he authors points.

"First Amendment." TheFreeDictionary.com. The Free Dictionary, n.d. Web. 19 Dec. 2013. <http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/first amendment>. The main idea is to examine the First Amendment. The author is trying to define the First Amendment. The intended audience is citizens curious about the Constitution. The source emphasizes the key points outlined in the First Amendment. The author assumes the reader is familiar with the Constitution. There is no bias in the source. There are no omissions in the source. The evidence clearly shows examples of the First Amendment in use.

First Amendment and the Meaning of Free Speech First Amendment and the Meaning of Free Speech Michigan State University, n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. <http://www.inclusion.msu.edu/Equity/FirstAmendmentAndFreedomOfSpeech.html>.

The main idea is that a persons Constitutional rights are constantly being violated. The author is trying to show the audience that they shouldnt just trust the government. The authors intended audience is the American people. The subject emphasizes the steps every American must take to recognize their rights. The author assumes the reader is a Constitutionally-curious American. The bias is against the government. There appear to be no omissions. The evidence supports the authors claim.

"First Amendment." LII / Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2014. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment>

"Freedom of Expression." Freedom of Expression. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2014. <http://www.hrea.org/index.php?doc_id=408>

George, Robert P. "Freedom Means Responsibility." Philadelphia Inquirer. N.p., 18 Aug. 2013. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20130818_Freedom_means_responsibility.html The main idea of this topic is to point out the responsibilities that come with the freedom of religion. The author is trying to teach the audience about their responsibilities to choose their own religion. I think the authors intended audience is towards Catholics. This source emphasizes the responsibilities to choose your own religion through a Catholic view. The author assumes that the audience is entirely Catholics. The author is biased because he is writing this

article from a Catholics view instead of all religious aspects. The author has omitted what the First Amendment says. The evidence supports the authors point a little bit, but not entirely.

Granderson, LZ. "'Duck Dynasty' Star's Free Speech Rights Weren't Violated." CNN. Cable News Network, 20 Dec. 2013. Web. 27 Jan. 2014. <https://www.aclunc.org/our-work/know-your-rights/know-your-rights-free-speechprotests-and-demonstrations-california>

Hughes, Keith. "The First Amendment for Dummies: The Basics of the 1st Amendment Explained." YouTube. YouTube, 28 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 Feb. 2014.

Hunt, Robert. "Religious Freedom and Religious Responsibility." Patheos. N.p., 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/roberthunt/2010/09/religious-freedom-and-religiousresponsibility/ The main idea of this source is to point out the freedom of religion here in the United States compared to other countries. The author is trying to teach the citizens of the United States that they have freedoms that other countries dont give to their citizens. The authors intended audience is Christians. The source emphasizes on the freedom of religion in the United States that other countries dont have. The author assumes that the audience is completely Christian. The author is biased towards other countries that dont have religious freedom. I see that author has omitted what the first amendment says to us. Yes, the author supports his topic with clear evidence from the Bible.

"Know Your Rights: Demonstrations and Protests." ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union, 2 Nov. 2011. Web. 28 Jan. 2014. <https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/know-your-rights-demonstrations-and-protests>

"Know Your Rights - Free Speech, Protests, and Demonstrations in California." ACLU of Northern California. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2014. https://www.aclunc.org/our-work/know-your-rights/know-your-rights-free-speechprotests-and-demonstrations-california

Moyer, Isabella R. "Rights and Responsibilities of Religious Freedom." National Catholic Reporter. N.p., 15 May 2012. Web. 17 Dec. 2013. http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/rights-and-responsibilities-religious-freedom The main idea of this source is that people have the freedom to choose who or what they believe in and who they want to worship. The author is trying to point out the freedom we have to choose our own religion. I believe the authors intended audience is the citizens of the United States. The subject this source is emphasizing is the freedom of religion and the citizens choice on their religion. The author assumes that the each citizen will responsibly choose their religion. I do not see any obvious omissions. I think the article supports the main point a little, but not very much.

"What Does Free Speech Mean?" USCOURTSGOV RSS. U.S. Courts, n.d. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.

<http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/get-involved/constitution-activities/firstamendment/free-speech.aspx>. The main idea is what the meaning of free speech is. The author is trying to use court examples to define free speech. Intended audiences include law students and historians. The source emphasizes the courts that have been fought over what is and what isnt protected under free speech. The author assumes the court cases ended either one way or the other. There is no bias in the source. The examples used seem to be one of many for each. The evidence shows what is and what isnt deemed free speech by the United States court system.