Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 288

88.

53
316.62
46

46

. .
. .: , 2013. 288 .: .
ISBN 978-5-496-00017-8
. ,
, , , . , .
, , .
.

88.53
316.62

. .

ISBN 978-5-496-00017-8

, 2013

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9



1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
1.2. , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
1.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
1.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
1.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37
1.6. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39
1.7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40
1.8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42

2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
2.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
2.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
2.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46
2.4. (, ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
2.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52

3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.1. , ! ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
3.2. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
3.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64

4. / . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
4.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
4.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .81

4.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
4.4. / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
4.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
5.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
5.2. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
5.3. / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
5.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
5.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
5.6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115

6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
6.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
6.2. / . . . 126
6.3. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131




7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
7.1. ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
7.2. / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
7.3. . . . . . . . 155
7.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
7.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
7.6. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
8.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
8.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
8.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
8.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
8.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182

9. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
9.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
9.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
9.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
9.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
10.3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
10.4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

11. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
11.1. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
11.2. . . . . . . . . . . 230

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
/ , , . . . . . . 273
/
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
. , . . . . . . . . . . 277
/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281


, .
, (. . , 1997, 2000; . . , 2001; . . , 2006;
. . , 2008; Brown, 1994; Hardin, 1998; Luman, 1979; Trust et al., 1988;
Distrust, 2004; Trust, Distrust, 2007; Schreier, 2012, .).
, , ,

(. . );
, , ,
(. . ); , ,
(, . . ), . . ; . ,

. .
, ,
,1 , ,
, ,2 , ,
,3 .
, ,
, ,
, .
.

.
. . (2001) , , , ,
, ,

, .
. . . .: , 2012.
, , . . ,
(Sztompka, 1999). , ,
. , ,
, , (Dasgupta, 1988).
, ,
, .
3
. . 4- . .: , 2012.
1
2

,
,
,
.
,
.
,
.
. .

,
. .
,
, , . ,
, , . ,
, , , .
. (Scheier, 2012)
.
, , , ,
, , , .
, , -:
, , ,
. -
, .
,
, ,
(. , 2006).

, (. . ., 2008). , -,
20062008 . 72, 68 70% ,
(. . ., 2008).

10

,
(World values survey)
,
, .
, ,
. ,
.
, , ,
, .
. ., 2011. . 23

, . , C. .
, . ,
. . (2006),
. - : . (
,
; ; ),
. ( ; ), . (
; ), . (
; ;
,
), . ( ),
. ( ; ;
).
: . , . , . , . , . , . ,
. , . .
, Trust: a sociological theory . (1999), , . .
,
, (. 3).
,
, , , ,
.
. . ,
,
.

-

11

. ,
,
, ,
.
, ,
. ( ; ; ),
. . ( ; ),
. . ( ; , ; ; ), . (
; ; ), .
( ; ).

, , . ,
,
.
, , ,
, .
. ,

.
,
,
.
. ., 2004

. , , , .-. , ,
.
,
, .
. . ,
150 , . , , ,
, , . : ! ,
(. 1, 2).
: . .
.
XX . ,
.
. . ,
1990- ., , , ,

12

(1998, . 374).
, : ,
, . . (. , 1994).
.
,
, . . (2000), ,
,
,
.
, ,
,
, -
.
,
: ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4
,5 . , ,
, , .
, , - ,
() (. . ).
/ , (

. . (1989), . (1994), . . . (1994), . . (1997, 2002), . . (1999), . . (2000, 2001), . . (2003),


. . (2003), . . (20062008), . . (20012006), . .
(2004), . . (2005), . . (2006), . . (2006), . . (2006),
. . (2009), . . (2009), . . (2009), . (2010), . . (2011),
2
. . . (2010), . . (1998), . . (1998), . . (1999),
. . (2000), . . (2004), . . (2006), . . (2007),
. . (2007), . . (2005, 2010), . . . . (2010), . .
(2010), . . (2010), . . (2011).
3
. . . (1996), . . . . (1998), . .
(2000), . . (2003), . . (2003, 2004), . . (2004), . . (2004),
. . (2008), . . (2008).
4
.: . . (1967), . . (2000, 2002), . . (2001), . . (2002),
. . (2003).
5
. . . (1992), . . (1996), . . (1998), .
(1999), . . . . (2000), . . (2000), . (2000),
. . (2001), . . (2003), . . . . (2003), . . (2003), . . (2003), . . (2004), . . (2004), . .
(2005), . . (2006), . . (2007), . . (2010).
1

13

)
(. . ).
/
. . . , ,
22 .
,
.
,
,
. , , , , . .
,
, (), ,
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
.
, ,
.
.
Bellum omnium
contra omnes ( ) (. ),
.
. ., 2006

,
. :
, . ,
, . ,
, -
. , .
, , . , , ,
,
.

14

, : .

. . .
(2004). , , .
.
, ,

, . , ,
, . .
,
, , .
,
, .

.

. . :
, .

, , , ,1
, , .
. . (2006), , , , , ,
. ,
. ,
() ( 2003 .) .
: -2003 :
, .
:
, .
, 47 ,
.
.
, . , . , . 70% ,
, . ,
.
1

15

.
, .
. .

.
:
(-, 2003); (, , 2003);
(, , 2005);
(, 2006);
(, , 2006).
, ,
- , . , ,
,
(. . , 2001). , (64%)
(56%). 8% , 14% ,
. .
, ,
, .
. . , [ ] , ,
. .
, . , .
<> <>
. :
. : , ,
. , - .
(. 6970).
. , , , , . , ,
. ,
, .
, , . 1990 .

,
. , , .
,

16

, , ,
. , . ,
. , . ,
, , .
.
.
, H2O.
, , , . ,
, .
, .
, .
. . ,1 , ,
. ,
, . , ,
. , ,

. .

. . // . 2001. 4. . 6872.

1.1.
:
- , .
, - ,
, , .
. , ,
- , , , - .
. . (1985)
: - , , - -, -.
: - , ; -.
(1983)
, ,
, , .
, ,
,
, .
. . : ?
: 1) ; 2) ; 3) . ,
.
,
, .
-.
, , , , ,
,

1.

19

, , , , .
,
.
(Castaldo, 2002; Misztal, 1996; Rose-Ackerman, 2001; Sztompka, 1999)
,
,
.
. (Castaldo, 2002),
, .
. , . , , : confidence, trust, faith.
-
(72 ) .
-, , , .
-, ;
, , , .
-, ( 42 72 )
,
, .
-,
; ,
.
-, .
. ., 2007. . 34

, . . (Gambetta
1988),
, .
, . , ,
.
: 1)
, ; 2)
; 3) ; 4) , , ; 5) .
,
,

20

(Govier, 1994; Hosmer, 1995).


.
. (1996) , ,
,
, , .
. . . (2004) ,
.
.
, - ,
, . , , , .
,
.
. . (2008)
.
/ .

.
. . (2000, 2004) ,
,

. , , ,
, (. , . ,
1999). . . (2008).
. . (2005) : (
), (
). ,
. . (1998).
. , ,
, (. . , 2000),
, , .
.
. . 1 (1995) ,
,
. . . (1984) ,

, ,
() .
1
(Durkheim, Emile) (18581917) , , .

1.

21

. ,
, .
. . ,
, (confidence).1 ,
, -
. . , ,
.
. . (2001). ,
, . . . ,
, (
), ( ),
( ) <>
, , , , , (. 69).
. . . ,
, : ,
. , ,
,
,
, ( ) , -
. ,
,
, , (. . , . . , 2010, . 10).
, . ,
.
, , ,
.
, : , , , .
. . . (2006) :
(, , ),
(, ),
(, ) - ? ,
.
, , ,
1

, , , .

22

,

. ,
.
, ,
( . . . . ).
. , , , , . : ,
, .
,
- , .
, , ,
, , . . , .
- . : 1)
, 2) , 3) 4)
. ,
.
() . ,

.
. . ,
( ) ( /).
, , ( )
. ,
,
.
(/) ,
.

, ,
.
: ,
,
(,
).
, . . ,
, .
. . . . , , -

1.

23

, .
, -,
.1 ,
, (. . 6).
, (, ,
), .
. ,
, ,
.
, . . . ,
. .
, , (:
).
, . . ,
,
.
,
, (
). , , . . , , . ,
, ?
. (Nannestad, 2008),
20002007 ., ,
,
, .
(. . , 2002), (
) (. , 1996; . , 2000), (. ,
1
, . . . . , , ; , , ?
, , . , : . ,
. , ,
. , .
? ,
, .
,
, , ;
? , , ,
,
, ,
, . ? ( ) ,
.
, , .

24

2001, 2002, 2003, 2006), (. , . , 2004; . . ,


. . , 2004; . , 2004), (. , 1999)
() (. , 1999)? , , - (. , 2003) ,
(. ., 2005)?
. ., . ., 2012

1.2. , ,
, ,
, , , , , . .
. /
, ,
(. . , 2000; McGregor, 1967; Rotter, 1967).
,
.
: () ().
. . , , ,
(2000). ?
, [. 11:1].
, .
, , ,
, ,
.
, ( ) ( . veritas
, verus ): 1) ,
, ,
, , ,
,
; 2) - , - .
, , ,
,
(. ).
, , .
,
( ), , .

1.

25

, .
.

,
(,
).
,
, .
. . . ,
, , .
.
, :
, , ,
(1994).
, , . . (1990),
, ,
( . . .).
-, - , . -.
-, ;
(. . ). , .
.1 , . . (1994)
,
, . .
.
, , .
. . (2004) .
,
, . . , . .
().
.
, , ,
, .
- -. .
,
.
, , , ,
,

-, -. , ,
(. . ).
1

26

, .
, , .
,
. ,
, .
,
, .
-
.
.
. . // .
(politpsy.ru)

,
, ; , , , , ,
(. . , 2000; . . , 2004). . .
, -
( ) (2000).
, , ,
, .

.

: ? ,
. -,
- , , , - , , .
, , ,
, . , , ,
. ,
, .
,

.
: , , , ,
: , .
,
. ,
, ,
, -

1.

27

. ,
, ,
.
, ,
- , ,
, , .
,
.
. // . ?
(portal-slovo.ru)

, , . ,
1 .
. .
, ,
, .
, , , :
, , .
, , ,
,
. ,
: , , - .
: , , -
.
, .
, ,
.
, : , , . ,
1
, , , . . ,
. ,
,
. , -,
, , ; , ,
. . ,
( ),
, ,
, . .
, , , ,
, , , .

28

, . :
, , ,
.
,
,

. , , , , ,
, . . .
.
, . ,
- (, ), ,
, , .
, , . , (, ),
,
. ,
. . .1 , ,
.

[ ] (. . , 2004). . . ,
. -
-, . . . , , .
, ,
.
,
(. 1.1).
1.1.


,


,
,

: . . .

1.

29

.1
( ) ,
.
-
. . (1997). , .
. . , (2000). . ,

(2002). . . ,
, .
. (Sztompka, 1999)
: , . , ,
. , , . ,

, - . , ,
: . ,

,
.
. (Hart, 1998) , ,
- . ,
, ,
.
, .
. , ,
, ,
, ,
.
, . . ,
.
.
. ,
,
.
1
. . (2007),
.

30

, ,
.
.
(Luhman, 1979, 1988). ( / ),
, . , ,
.
. ,
, .
.
, ,
.
, , ,
.

,
. , ,
, . ,
. , ,
,
(1988).
, ,

(). . :
, ,
, , .
, (1979).
,
.

,

, .
. ,
. . ,

, -
. . , , ,

1.

31

,
(1979).
. ,
. , . , ,

, ,
(2002).

.
. (Dasgupta, 2000), . , ,

( ,
),
. , . (Yamagishi, 1998). .
,

. , ,
. ( ) .
( )
. , .
.
, ,
( ) .

,
, / .
. - (Ullmann-Margalit, 2002) ,
-, -,
-.
,
. (Giddens, 1990, 1991), . . , : , , , , , ,
(1990). .

,
. , ,
. ,
(, )
, . . ,
-

32


. ,
, ,
. ,
. .
. ,
,
- , , . ,
,
(1990).
. ,
/ . .
,
,
. .
, .
, . . , .
,
.
, . ,
. (Barbalet, 1999): ,
.
, ,
.
. . (2001) , ,
. . ,
.
; , ,
, , .
. . -,
-.
. . , (
credo) . ,
,
. ,
. ,
, , ,
. , , ,
, , ,
, .
. . (2008),
, , , ( -

1.

33

).
(, , )
: , , (
).
: , , ,
. , , ,
.
, , ,
. . . (Das, Teng, 1998). , , , . .

1.3.
.
- : - ,
- ,
, .
,
, . . .
, - -, . .
. . . . . (2005)
.

. : ;
. : ;
. : ;
. : ;
;
. . : ; ; ;
;
. : ;
. . : ; ;
. : ;
. : ;
. . : ; ; ;

34

. . : ; ;
. : ;
. . : ; ; ; ;
. . : ;
. : ;
. : ;
;
. . : ;
. . : ;
. : ; .
. .

. . : (Levis, Weigert, 1985; Robinson, 1996); (, 2000); - (Butler, 1991);


(McAllister, 1997; Lewicky, Buncker, 1996; Hosmer, 1995);
(. , . , 2000).

1.4.
, , .
, -
( , ),

.
. . . . (2009) ,
()
, .
,
, ,
, .
(Luhman, 1979), ,
, .
.
()
, ,

1.

35

,
, .
-
:
; (
, , , , );

;
, ;
;
(
,
, , ,
);
, , - - ;
;
( ,
);
( );
(
);

;
, .
() :
;
/ ( ,
);
;
;
;
;
( ) ;
( )
.
(. .

36

). ,
(. . , 2008).
. . ,

, .
, , ,
. ,

, , ,
.
, ,
. . ,
, ,
, , ,
.
. . , (1), , : , ,
( ), (
), (
), (
), ( ),
( ),
,
. .
/ . /
: / , /
. . :
, post factum. /
.
, . . .
, , , , , , , , .
. (1996) , , , , ,
, , , , ,
. ,
,
, ,
, .
1

1.

37


,
.
. . (2003) ,
, .
, , ,
.
, ,
. . (2011) :
: , (), , , , , ,
, , , ,
, ;
: , , ,
, -,
, , ;
: , , ,
, , , , .
1

1.5.

. , , .
,
: , .
, , , ,
(Sztompka, 1999).
. , , ,
. ,
.
. , . ,
: (. .
), (. 1.2). . 4;
,
.
1
, , , ,
.

38

.
1.2. ( . )

1.
,
:

:
;
;
.
2. .
3.

;
;

;
;
;

, . . ,
: ( ), (
), , , ,
, , ,
. ,
- (-
, -, - . .).
, ,
, , , .
. .
, ,
, .
- . ,
, . , , , , , . ,
,
. ,
, , , ( ).
,
( ),
.

1.

39

, . . , , :
( , )
( )
;
( ,
, , , , .).

, , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , . .
.

1.6. ,
( )
, (. . ):
1) ;
2) ;
3) () ;
4) ,
.
:
;
;
.

, . , (, , , .)
.
, ,
, ,
, .
, .

( , ), .
. . (Boyle, Bonacich, 1970) , ,
,
.

40

1.7.
. . . . ,
,
.
.
, , . . ,
. , , .
,
, , .
() () ().
, , , . ,
, , .
.
, .
. -,
-, , - , ,
, , . .
, .
,
( , ;
?). ,
, .
,
, (. 1.1).
()
- -. , . :
;1
, , ;
, ;
;
;
.
:
, , (Shapiro, 1987).
1

1.

41

. 1.1. , -

, : , , ,
, .
, , , , .
. ., . ., 2010. . 20

.
(), (
).
( ,
, ).
,
(
).
( ) () .

, /.

( , , ).
, ,
,
,
, (. . , 2006).

42


.
, .

(. , 2000; . -, 2010).
:

, .

: , , ,
, ,
. . ,
,
. ,
,
.
.
- . ,


,
.
. ., 1998

/, (Deutsch, 1968; Kegan, Rubenstein, 1972).



, .
, . .
, , .
.

1.8.
.
.
() . . , ?

1.

43

? .
, , . ,
, .
. ,

, . ,
, . , ,
, .
. ., 2005. . 35

, . ,
,
, (. 1.2).

. 1.2.

:
( , ). , , ;

, ;
( ).

2.1.

. , . (2004, 2005) .
(,
), , -
, . , ,
. , . . (2006) .
. . (Jones, George, 1998)
. , .
, .
, . ,
.
.
, ,
.
. . . , ,
, .
(Lewicki, Bunker, 1996),
, :
, ;
, ,
,
, , , ;
, , , - ,
, .

2.

45

. . (2004)
(, ): ,
, , , ,
, .
. . (2006)
: (), , , .
/,
, - . ; , / (
); () ;
; ; ; /.
,
,
. . - (. . , 2005).
.
, . ,
.
. . (2007)
. ,
: ,
, .

2.2.
. , ,
, .
, , , .
. . ,
.
, ,
,
.
, , , ,
, , . ., ,

.
, -,
,

46

.
, , ,
- ,
, .
, , , ,
, .
,
,
.
, -
,
.
-
.
, . . ,
, . ,
, , ,
.
,
, . . ,
.
. ,
, . ,
,
, ,
, .
. . (2010),
(100 90,9% ), 66,7%.

2.3.
, ,1 ,
, . , , , ,
,
.
1

2.

47

, . , , ,
, ,
, , .
. ,
,
.
.

. : : 1)
; 2)
; 3)
, , ;
4) ,
, .
. 2.1
, . .
. . .
2.1.




,
,

,



,
,




,


,
, ,
, ,



,

;

48

.
. 2.1



,
, ;

, ,
, , ,
.
,
, , , . . ,
, .
,
,
.
, , ()
.
.
.

, .
, , . ,
, ,
.
, , ,

. ,
, , , , . . ,
, , , , .

, .
. ., 2004

2.

49

( )
, . . , ,
, ,
(. . , 2000). , , , ,
.
,
, , ,
. ,
, . .
,
,
. ,
, , .
, , ,
, ,
.
, ,
, . ,
, ,
. , , ,
, , .
.
. ., 2004

. . (2010) ,

(16,7%).
. . (2003) , ,
,
, .

2.4. (, )

. , . .

50

.
, ,
.
WVS (World Value Survey)/EVS (European Values Study)
( 1000 ),
, : ,
, , ?
, European Social Survey, ESS (europeansocialsurvey.org),

0 ( ) 10 ( ).
, ,
WVS, 1999 . .
:
/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

19

66,5
66,3
65,3
60,0
54,5
53,0
43,0
41,8
41,0

23,9

,
,
, , .
. ., . ., 2010. . 1718

, .
WVS,
37,5% 1990 23,7% 1999 . 1990 .
(, 50 , ) ,
( 40% ), 1990-
. , ( )

2.

51

. 40 45,8%,
1,5% (
).
.
. , ,
(
) , ,
- .
,
,
.
.
, .
()
.
. , ,
.
()
(particularized), .
, .
,
, . . ,
.
,
(, .).
,
, ,
.
. ., 2007. . 1112

. . .


. , -,

,
. -
, , ,
.

52

, . .
: -, ,
, .
. -, , ,

. -, , ,
,
( ).
,
. -,
, ,
, ,
, , (. 12).
, :
1) , ;
2) ;
3)
;
4) ;
5)
;
6) .
.

2.5.
. (1990) -,
, . ,
- (
, ), ( ), (, ) , . .
,

2.

53


.
. . , , ,
, . . .
.
(15% ) . ,
, , , . ,
, , .
.
(20% ) ,
, , ,
, . / . ,
.
(16% ) , .
.
, ,
.
, .
(29% ) ,
, ,
,
.
(20% ) , .
,
, ,
, . ,
.
: ,
, .
. . (2011) (. 2.2).
(Lewicki et al., 1997), , , :
1) , , : ;
,
; , , -

54

.
2.2.

; , ;
;
2) , , :
; ,
; , ,
;
3) , , :
, , , ; , , .
. . (2004)
. .
-
. -, -, .
-, , -

2.

55

. - .
. .

, ,
: , ,
, .
.
.
, ,
, .
.
, , .
, ,
, , .
, , , , .
.
37,5% .
. ,
( 44% 29% ). 25 ,
(40%) 2535 .
, ,
, .
26% . 45 .
(39% 13% ) ( ) .
, ,
, , :
, , , .
, , , . . .
, .
36,5% . . : 25 3545
. 25 46%; 2535 25;
3545 43%.


, ,
- ,
.

. , . ,
, .
, , , , , , , .
,
,
. ,
.
. ,
, , ,
, , , .
. ., . ., 2010. . 14

3.1. ,
! !
,
.
, , , , . .

3.

57

.
, , , .
, .
: , .
, .
, :
, , . ,
:
.
.
.
, ,
! , :
!, , ,
, , ,
, - .
, , :
-, . , ,
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
1 () ,
, ,
, .
56
.
,
500 1500 . , :

, .
( ),
- . , ,
.
: 500
.
,
, ... ,

58

.
, -:
, ,
. , VISA,
...
.
, : 100 . 2 . ,
.
// . 2001. 17 (407). 24

.
. ,
, , .
,
, , (. . ,
. . , 2012).
, , .
, , . .
,
,
. ,
, . !
.
(dobrieskazki.ru/semeynie zapovedi1.htm)

, 20% ,
40% , .
89 , 710 . , ,
- ,
. - ,
.
.
, .
.

3.

59

,
, , . guardchild.com, 69%
. ,
, , , ,
.
.
,
, -:
, .
,
, .
, 18.
- .
.
, ,
. , .
, . -
.

.
. , . ,
KinderGate , 2010 .
, ,
, .
?
, , , ,
.
, , ,
, , .
,
,
.
, , , , ,
, , ,
.

60

, ,
, .
,
,
.
,
, .
, .
(gen.su/node/13291)

: . , ,
- .
, ,
, .

3.2. :

, .
. ,
(. . ,
1908). (
), (
),
( - ). , .
. . (2004) : 1) , ; 2) ; 3)
.
. ,
, . , 1214
: 1) ( ,
); 2) ( , ); 3) (- , ); 4)
( ); 5) ( ); 6) ( ).
-: , ,
. . (2009)
. . : (, , ) (, ,
, , ).
. . , -

3.

61

( ). ,
.
. . ( ),
, , ; (, , , )
(, , ).

, ,
, . , : ,
, -,
.
.
, , ,
, , ,
. 8001000
300400 ?
, .
. . , ,
.
,
. <> Google. ,
(
, ru).
. , , ,
, - ,
. , ,
. , . ,
.

.1
, . ,
. , ,
. (2009) , ,
, : , . , , ; -,
, ; -, . ,
, , .

(4- . ., , 2010).
1

62

, , . ,
(Ekman et al., 1988).
(Scherer, 1986).

,
:
80% ; 75% ; 65% ;
65% .

.

: 1)
- ; 2)

; 3) ; 4) L MMPI
; 5)

; 6)
F
.
,
.
. ., 2009. . 243244

: , ,
, , (Apple et al.,
1979; Zuckerman et al., 1981).
(Koehnken, 1985).
,
, , . ,
: ,
, , .
(Kraut, 1978) ,
, , , ,
.

3.

63

, (Kraut, Poe, 1980).


(Waid, Orne, 1981) , , ,
. , , .

. , , .
.
, ( )
. ,
, .
, , .
.
, , , ,
; ( ) ,
;
.
, ,
.
, , ,
, , . , , ,
.
. .
, , (DePaulo,
Rosenthal, 1979).
: ?
, , , , , .
. , ,
, (Kraut, 1980) 57% ,
(50%).
,
, - (Kraut, Poe, 1980).
,
, . (,
),
, 100
. (
), -,
(), -

64

, , .
, .
.
, , ,
, ,
. , , ,

( )
, .
., ., 2000. . 296297

, , ,
.
, . , , .
,
. , , .
,
. ,
.
- , , , . ,
.
, , ,
, . .
, , ,
. , --,
. . .
,
. - ,
, , - .
, ,
,
?
. ,
.

3.3.
. . . . , , .

3.

65

. , . (2003) ,
.
, , ,
.
, , ,
.
, : ! ,
.
, , .
,
.
, .
, .

(McAlister, 1995; Hosmer, 1995; . . , 2001;


. . , 2004) ,
- ,
, (Beier,
1985; Govier, 1994; Lewicki et al., 1998).
. (Lewicki et al., 1998), , ,

, , .
,
.
, . . , . . (2007),
. . (2008), , , :
, , . .
.
. ,
, . (,
, , ) .
: , ,
, , , .


(Kramer, 1999; Rotter, 1967, 1971; . . , 2010, .),
- ,
.

. , , ,
, .
, .
. .
( ). ,
, , . , , . ,
, ,
. .

. . (2011) ,
, , .
( ), , , , ,
, , . ( )
. , ,
( , ),
.
, . -, ,
. , ; ,

4. /

67

, ,
.
, ,
-, - . : ,
, , ,
, .
, .
. ., 2011

,
.

4.1.
,
.
,
.
, .
.

,
, .
.

. . (2011) ,
, . . ( ) ( ) , .
. . (2004) , (?!) , .
, , . . . (Bernheim, 1916).
:
, .

68

,
, , , ,
, , , ,
, (. . ,
2010).
. (Rotter, 1967, 1971)

, () . , ,
,
.
. . (2008) ,
, ,
.
, 150 , ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, . / ,
.
:
, , .
. , , , ().
, ,
, , ,1
. , ,
, , , , .
, .
, ,
.
.
, , (, ,
).

-, , .

4. /

69

, ,
-.
,
.

, .
, ,
, .

, ?

, , .
1

, . , (. . ).
, , , , , , , . :
, .2
, .
, :
, ?
, .
, , , , .
, .
.
.

.
( ). , , , ,
.
, .
? ,
.
.
, , .
1
2

70

, , , . ,
, , .

, 30 . . ,
,
.


, , . ,
, ,
. ,
, .

Quote. . ,
. ,
- . . , ,
. .
, , . ,
, .
, .

.
, .
. .
. , .
, .
, , ,
?
,
! , , , . :
! ! ?
,
?
?

4. /

71


. .
,
. ?
(, ), , ,
, .
,
, . -
, ,
, - .
. , . .
, , ,
? , ,
. -
. , , . ,

.
, .
, , .
? : ?
,
, , , , , , .
, .

. .
. ,
, .
//

, .

? .
, , , , , : ! ,
,
. . , .

72

,
, . ,
III, .

, 38 . , - ,
. , ,
, .
, : , .

? -, ,
, . , ,
.
-, ,
: , . ( ), ,
. ,
, . ,
, .
, , .
, ,
, .
: , ,
, ,
. ,
, . , , .
. ? !
, . , , .
, , ! ,
, , , , .
, ,
.
, .
. . . , , . .
? . .
. .

4. /

73

, . , , ,
, .
! ,
?..
?! ? ? , ,
. , ,
, .
,
. ?
, ,
, ? , .
.
? ,
, ?
, ?
! !
, ! ,
!
, ! ,
, , . , .
! , ,
! , - .
?

, ?! ?
//

, .
: .
, . , ,
.
,
. ( . infantilis ) ,
,
.
,
, , . . , ,
.
. () , , ,
. -

74

.
, .
.
, (. . , 1977), .
, , , , .

,
, ,
, , ,
, , , ,
(. . , 1997; .).
, . , ,
. , ,
, (. . , 1998;
. . 4.1). , I .
. (A. Binet, 1900) . (1900).
;
.

. 4.1. ( . . )

4. /

75

, (. . , 1977; . , 1977).
. , , , C.
(S. Asch, 1956).


. , . ,
,
: , ,
? , 2. ,
, , : 2.
, . .
, ,
. ,
. , .
. ? .
? ? .
. , : , ?
?
. ,
, 99 100 . :
(, )
, ,
? , .
37% ( , 37%
?).
,
, ,
, .
., 2004. . 249251


()
. , ,
, - . ,

76

, .
, , ,
.
. , ,
,
.

. , . (Crutchfield, 1967) .
.
.

, (, , . . . (1970),
,
). : ,
,
, .
. (Kiesler, Kiesler, 1969). ,
() ,
, ,
. (Nail et al., 2000)
. (, ),
, , , (,
, ).
, . , , , , , .
(Deutch, Gerrard, 1955) ,
, ,
:
.
, , ,
, .
, , ,
.
, , ,
.
., 2003. . 229

4. /

77

,
; , ( , ,
).
.
,
.
, .
(c)
() , ( ) . . (1969). :
- : ,
( 12 , 16 );
, ;
: , ;
, ;
: , ;
:
;
;
: ;
, : ,
;
(
);
,
: ,
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
(Gerard et al., 1968; Rosenberg, 1961; Milgram et al.,
1969). ,

(Wilder, 1977).
: ,
(Morris, Miller, 1975). :
, . ,
, .

78

, , (Berkowitz, 1954; Sakurai, 1975).


: , , ,
:
, , ,
, , , ,
(Ash, 1955).
, . ,
, (Deutsch, Gerard, 1955).

,
, . .
.
(Nancy Carter) (Mark
Weber) , .
- ,
, .
,
.
20 ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
:
, . .,
, .
, , ,
MBA.
, , , .
,
, ,
, .

, ,
.
, , ,

4. /

79

, ,
, .
(.
)

, (. . , 1969;
Hartup, 1958; Fagot, 1978; Osman, 1982; . . , 2005).
. ,
(Eagly, Carli, 1981).
, ( ), . .
:
, ,
,
(Eagly, Wood, 1985).
, . , ,
- , . ,
, , ,
, , .
(Eagly et al., 1981) (2001).
: .
, , .
, , ,

, ,
.
,
, , ,
. , 79% ,
, ,
, - , , ,
,
, . ,
-?
, ,
(Hovland, Janis, 1959; Janis, Field, 1956).
. , ,

(Hartup, 1970). , , , , .

80


, . . . ,
, .
. (Zimbardo, 1977), , .
, ,
(McGuiere, 1985).
- , , ,
.
.
. (Nurmi, 1970) , .
, , ,
.
.
(. . , 1997).
. , , . . , , ;
, ;
.
, , , , . , . . (2004)
, , , , , ,
, - .
.
.
, .
.
,
, (35%),
(18%).

(23 24%).
. ., 2004

. . (2010) ,
() . . , ,

(. 4.1).

4. /

81

4.1.

/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9


0,14
0,27
0,39**
0,22
0,30*
0,16
0.24
0,28*
0,39*

: * 0,05; ** 0,01.

, , . .
;
;
.

,
, , ,
, , . . .

4.2.
, , .
,
.1


.

.
, ,
,

.
,
,
.
,
.
,
,

,
, , , :
, , ,
(. 20:25). (
, , , [2]),
: ! (. 20:28).
( ) .
1

82

...

.
.
.
.
:
.

.

.
, ,
.
:
.

.

,

.

,
, ,
.

.

:
:
.
!

.

.

.

.
, ,
!

:
,
!

.

:

.

:
...
...

, ,
.

.

.
,
...

.
,
:
, ,
!
,


.
.

, , , .
. . ,
. , ,
(. 4.2).

4. /

83

. 4.2.
( . . , 2008)

. . (2007) . ,
0,30 (p < 0,05).
, , (5,1 ),
() (4,2 )
(3,9 ).
. . (2010),
.
,
.
.

. ,
. , ,
. ,
, .
, ,
.
,
. , , . . . - -

84

( )
.
- -? , .
:
1) : , ,
, , ;
2) :
, . .;
3) , .
? :
1) , ,
. , ;
2) , , -
. , , - ,
;
3) , ,
, ;
4) , , -.
. , , . ( . negatio ) ( )
. , , (
) .
. , (
).
, ,
, ,
, , .
, .

.
. ( , ) , ,

4. /

85

, , .
( ) .
,
,
.
, ,
.
.

.
, , , , , .
, .
:

;
;
;
, ,
;
.
. ( . skepsis )
-, ,
, -. : , , , , .
. , ,
, , .
. ,
. , .
, . ,
. : ,
(. . .), .
.
.

, , , .
. , . . (
), , .
. , ,
. ., , .

86

, , ,
. .
,
.
.

, , . ,
.
, , (. ).
.
, ;
, , , . ,
, .
, .
, , ,
.
.

,
, . .

. . ,1 . . .
, .
. ,
,
. ,
,
, . ,
. . ,
, . . , ,
, . , .
, , , , ,
. ,
. , ,
.
1

4. /

87

. . . .
. . (1994) 1919 .
. , , ,
, ,
, , . ,
.
,
, .
.
, , ,
. :
- ? , ,
.
, . . ,
.
,
, , . .
,
, ,
,
; ,
, .
, .
, . : , ,
, .
, ,
.
,
, .
,
.

,
,
, ,

88


. , .
, ,
,
, .
,
.
. . , , .
, . .
. ,
,
.
.
,
, .
,
, .
, .

... ,
, , : , , .
. --

.
.

. . : . ,
,
.
.
, .
,
.

4. /

89

,
.
, - , . , , ,
, . ,
:
, .
. .

, . ,
;
.
.

. ,
.
,
.
, , ,
. ,
. . (2004),1 ,
: .
, , , .
, , .
,
. , ,
.
, , , , .
. , . ,
,
. ,
.
, .
1

. // . 20032004. 1 (30).

90

4.3.
. , .

( ). , , ,
. ,
, ( : , ).
.
. ,
( ) ,

, , , .
. , ,
. , .
- (
), .
.
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
:
1) , ,
;
2) - , ;
3) (
).

4.4. /
. .
.
.
. ,
, .

4. /

91

, . ,
,
,
, , ,
. ;
; ,
(. : ., ., 1997).

. , ,
. - ,
,
. . :
, ,
. , , .
, , ,
, . ,
.
. . ,
.
. . . ,
, , .
, - . ,
.
, ,
, .
.
,
. ,
. ,
, .
(sunhome.ru)


. , . ,
, , ,
, ,
.
, (1996).

92

,

.
.
- ,
. , ,
. .
. . (2001) ,
(
);
, .
, - .
, . ,
.
, , .
. . . , , ,
. . , , ,
, .
,
, .
/ . .

. , ,
. ,
. . , /
.
.
. , ,
, ,
.
, , .
, .
, 1 .

.
, ,
1
.

4. /

93

.
, .
. ,
,
. , , ,
, .
/ , , .
,
, . .
/
, ,
, , .
. /
, .
. . ,
. ,
,
,
(1997).
, .

: . . . . , 2001; . . , 1974;
. . . . , 1994.

haotic_anna. : ,
. - , ,
. , ,
: , ? ? -
... . .
. , .
, , : , -, ... , .
, ,
. ,
.

. . (2000). ,
,
, ,

94

.
, , ,
.
, , , :
, , ;
, , ,
;

, .
: , ,
,
.
,
.
. . ,
, .

(. . , 2000):
1) ;
2) - ,
;
3) ( , , );
4) ,
, , ;
5) - ,
;
6)
, .

4. /

95

. . .
. :
,
.
, . . (2004),
.

.
.

,
.

: ;

;
.
. . ,
.

.
/. . . (2001)
, , . , , ,
. / ()
. ,
.
. ,

. (Bos) .

0,5
,
.
10 .
,
.
, , ,
2 .
2008 . , .

96

,
. ,
( ), .
(Kosfield et al., 2003;
Zak et al., 2003).
, .

.
- , .
,
.
,
, , ,
(Cesarini et al., 2008).
, .
, , . .
,
. .
() .
, - ( )
. ().
, -
. .
,
. , , ,
.
. , , . , ,
, .
,
. , , ,
.
,
.
, ,
( ), ;

4. /

, .
658 (71
258 ), 706 (75 278 ). .

, ,
,
.
, ; ,
,
. , , ,
, .
- ,
:
1) .
. , , ,
. ,
;
2) , , . ,
, ,
. :
, , ,
;
3)
, , .
, 0,20/0,12/0,68 0,10/0,08/0,82 ;
0,18/0,17/0,66 0,17/0,12/0,71
.
,
;
, .
,
,
, , ,
.
, .
, 1020% .
, . , -

97

98

- . ,

, ,
.
,
. ,

. -, ,
,
, . ,
, - .
, , ; ,
,
, 1020% . ,
, ,
.
-,
. -
, , . .
,
( ).
- .
-,

(
). , ,
,
, ,
.
, ,
, ( ).
(
). , , 20%
.
,
, , .
,
. 2000 .
, ,
, .

4. /

99

: ,

. ,
, .
//

,
(Norman et al., 2011), ,
,
.
100 1835
. :
, . , 90 .
, , , , ,
.
, ,
, . , ,
, , . . . , , ,
, ,
. ,
.
,

. .
( ,
, ,
).
; , ().
. ,
( ,
,
).
10 , . ,
, . ,
, 0,5 .
, ,
: 15 . , ,
0,5 ; ,

100

.
. ,
, .
52% ( ), 20% (
), 28% (
). 17%
, 58% , 25% . ,
,
. ,
,
. ,
. , (. .
) . (. . )
. , -
.
,
, . . .
, - ?
, .
, ,
, . ,
: ,
,
.
(psyfactor.org/news/oxytocin.htm)

4.5.

.
.
,
.

.
.

.

4. /

101

.
. 11 1415 ,
,
.
. . (2006),
,

.
, , . . , . . , ,
,
.
, .
, .
. . . . / . ,
/
. ,
, ,
( 1720 51 ).
. . .
(2011) , ()
, . . . , 1720
.
,
. /
. 17 20
, ()
, . ,
, .
.
( 51 ) /
. ,
/ .

.
2130 .
4150 . ,
. . . ,
2130 ,

102

. 4150

.

. ,


.
. . . ,

, . . ,
, . .
. ,
. .
, , :
.

, .

5.1.
, , ,
.
, .

().
,
.
.

. . (2008),
1 , . ,
.
( ) (, ,
),
. ,
.
, . . ,
(97,8%) (82,6%).
( 30,4 72,5%), (
6,5 67,5%) ( 11,4 35,0%).
5793%
743% .

,
.
1

104

,
, , ,
.
- ( 30,4%, 17,4, 6,5%), -
( 72,5%, 67,5, 35,0%).
- ( 47,7, 36,3, 11,4%).
, .

. , , , - ,
, , .
. // ? (portal-slovo.ru)

. (1998), , ,
, ,
.
,
. . , <>
, ,
, <>
. , ,
, ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
.
(,
, ,1 ,
,
, ).
, ,
, . , .

1
, (. . , 2003). ,
, .
. , . , ,
- (. . , 1998). , ,
. .

5.

105

5.2. ,

,
(. . , . . , 2007). ,1 , ,
, , .
, ,
, , , , , ,
, . , ,
, , .
. . (1998), , ,
, , , , , .
.
- ,
, , , . , , ,
, .
,
.
. .

, , , ,
, ,
, .2
, .
, . . (1999) , ,
. (151 196) ,
.
. . (1988) , , . , . . , , ,
. . . ,
, . ,
, ?
,
. . (2008), : ,
, ; , , .
2
. ., 1983.
1

106

, , . ,
, .
, , ,
.1
, .


. ,
.
, .
. .

5.3. /
. . . . (2005) ,
, .
- ,
. .
- (, ,
, . .).
,
.
.
, , , , .
, , , , .
/ . .
.
. , ,
1

. ., 1983.

5.

107

, , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
, ,
, , , .
, , , , , , , , .
,
.
, , (85%),
(55%).
(90%) , (65%).
, .
:
(9585%), (9095%), (8580%),
(7580%), (7065%), (65%), (8075%),
(60%), (75%) .

.
: (8075%),
(5560%).
. : (65%),
(60%), (60%), (55%), (55%).
,
(70%), (70%), (65%),
(65%), (60%), (55%),
(55%).
: (60%), (60%), (55%). (80%)
(55%), (75%), (65%), (60%).
, , , .
, .
, .
.
. .
. ., 2007. . 244

108

, , . , -
. , . - (McHoskey et al., 1998) ,
, .
, ,
: , , , .

5.4.
. , , .
. (2004),
, ,
, , , ,
( , ,
) (Cook, Flay, 1978; Pratkanis et al., 1988).
, ,
, .
, 14 1803 . : ,
Colonna. , VIII

, . , ,
. : , ,
- .
, ,
,
. , , . . ,

.
: , , ,
, 1147 ..
. . . ., 1985. . 118119

, , - .

5.

109

,
(Chaiken, 1980; Petty et al., 1981).
. .
, ,
-. , ,
. , (Miller et al., 1976).
, , .
. . (Erickson et al., 1978)
, ,
. .
, .
.

, . ,
, , , (. . , 2010).
. . . , :
,
(Chaiken, 1970; Dion, Stein, 1978; Pallak et al., 1983; Van Knipperberg,
Wilke, 1992; Wilder, 1990).

,
, ,
, .
,
,
,
.
,
, :
, , ,
. ,
, , .
,
.

110

,
. , , ,
.
, .
: ,
. .
, , , . ,

, .
, , ,
.
, : , ,
, , , .
, .
, , , ,
.
(sciencemagic.ru)

.
. ,
.
,
, . ,
, ,
.
. ,
- ,
.

, . ,
,
. ,
, , , . ,
, /
, , .
.
: , . .
. ., 2001. . 43

5.

111

, . ,
, .
1931 . . : , ,
,
.
.
. ,
,
, , , ,
.
,
. ,
, .
.
, ,
. ,
, ,
(Eagly, Wood and Chaiken, 1978). , , , ,
.
, ,
, ,
.

, , ,
.
., 2004. . 295

, . ,
,
, . ,
, ,
.
. ,
,
, .

112


,
, . . ,
.
Superjob.ru ,
. ,
,
.
73%
. ! , ,
; , . ,
, (77 69% ).
,
24 (76%),
25 (78%). 45
, 45 ,
63 65% .
15% (18% ,
13% ). , : ,
.
45 (24%),
45 (20%).
, :
, .
:
.
12% . ,
, ? ,
. ,
, .
,
. :
. :
78% . (77%) (72%). ,
, ,
:
.
, , ,
, .
(25%):
, ,
. -

5.

113

(23%), ( 22%),

: , .
,
.
.
, ( ?
!), (
!), (
,
), (
, .
). ,
:
, !
, , ,
? ,
, . , , ( 7%), PR-
( 5%), ( 4%).
: , ,
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
: (
, ),
(
. ,
, ).
,
: , ?

, .
, , .
, , .
, ,
, , . , .
, .
.
PR: , ,

114

, , ,
.
.

(Peters, Ceci, 1982) , .
, 18 32
. ,
(
-),
, .

, , ,
,
,
.
, ,

28
,
. ,
,
28 , ,
.
., 1999. . 205206

. : , , , .
, ,
,
,
. !
, ,
, ,
; , ,
,
, (1998).

5.5.
, . ,
, , . , .
.

5.

115

: ;
.
- . - , ,
.
, , .

, , .
, . . , , ,
. , :
, (,
);
, ;
;
, . . , ,
.

, .
.

-, -,
, .
-.
. ,
, ,
,
.
, ,
.
,
(Cook, Flay, 1978; Pratkanis et al., 1988). ,
,
, .
, ,
.

5.6.
, ,
(. . ). ,
, () .

116

,
, , , ,
.
, .
,
(
), . ,
, .
, ,
. . . ,
.
().
:

;
;
;
;
.

. , ,
. ,
,
. .
, , ,
. , ,
, .
. -
.
, .
, . , ,
.
, , .
. , . ,
, .
- , , .

, . . - ,
, . , ,
(

5.

117

, , ),
. ,
,
, .
,
. ,
, . ,
.
.
, .
,
. , ,
.
.
, , , -, .

,
. . ,
.
, ,
.
? ,
.
,
. ? ,
! , ,
, ,
.
? .
, , ,
,
.
, ,
, .
, ,
!
, , , .
( ,
. 2012. 17 )

118

. ,
. ,
, ,

.
.
, .
.
.

.
.
, .
.
- . :
, , .
,
.
.
:
, (
, ), : , , ,
. :
( ), ( ), ( ),
( ).1
, . ,
, .
,
.
: , , , ,
, , . :
( ), (
).

( , , ,
), .
. , ,
.
1

5.

119


, : , , ,
, ,
, ,
. : (
), ( ).

, .
, , ,
. , . .
. - , .
, ,
. ,
.
, .
.
, .
, ,
. .
, . .
.
, .
,
, .
, . , , ,
.

6.1.
.

.
.

, , , ,
. . . (2008), ,
<> ,
, , -
,
.
, ,1 .
, ,
,
.
.

,
1
1415
(. . , 1984).

6.

121

.
,
,
. , ,
, -
, ,
- .
.
, , ,
, . , , ,
,
,
.
. ., 2004

, . . (2008),
: , , ; ,
,
; ;
,
; ;
;
, ,
, ;
.
, , ,
, . ,
. ,
,
.
,
.
. // . ?
(portal-slovo.ru)

, ,
, (. ),
, .
. , .

122


,
, , , ,
,
(. . , 1995; . . , 1979; . . ,
1977; . . , 1995). . .
, ,
, :
1) , ,
. .;
2) - ( , ,
. .);
3) ;
4) .
. ., 1999

, , , , , (. . , 1981). . .
.
- ,
,
, .
.
,
, .
;
, .
,
.
,
(, .).

,
. , ,
(58,8%), (55,3%), (48,2%),

6.

123

(34,1%), ,
(28,2%).
, ,
, (63,8%),
(38,3%),
(33,3%), (26,2%).
. ., 2004


( , ),
:
;
(, ),
, , ;
, ( , , , , ), ,
.
. (1973) () ,
().
, ,
, ,
, .
, , . () ,

()
.
, . . ,
. ,
(), .

,
,
.
.
: 1)
-

124


2) ().
( ) , , , , ,
, .
. ., 2008

,
. . . (2006) (, ,
. .), ( . .),
( , . .), (, ) . . . (1981)
, ( ),
(, )
(, :
).
, , , (. . ,
2001).
. ,
. . (1995), .
. , , .
, ,
.
. . , . . (2009) , ,
,
, , .
/
. , ,
,
. . , ,
,
,
. , ,
.

, , . , -

6.

125

, .
: , ,
.
. . . .
.

: , , , , .

( ).

, .
. . , ,
/
/
. , , - -, - -,

.
. . (2006) , ,
, .
. ;
,
; ,
.
. . (. 6.1): , ,1 ,
.
.

. ,
, . .
.
,
. .
.
, ,
.
1

, , .

126

6.1.
,

7,5
66,2
21,3
1,7
5,0

7,7
42,5
23,0
7,7
19,1

41,6
33,3
8,4
16,7

: (-), , , , .

6.2.
/
, . , . . ,
, - . ,
, .
,
. ,
,
, .

.
. . (2008), ,
. , ,
, ,
.
, .
( ) / ,
,
.

:

6.

127

, ;
;
.
. . ,
, ,
.

,
,
, , .
. . , , , /,
.
,
.
,
.
,
/.
.
, ,
, .
,
.

, , / .
, .
.
.
. , .
,
. , , ,
.

(. 6.1).

128

. 6.1

, ,
, . , , .
, .
.
.
, , .
. .
, ,
(. 6.2).

. 6.2

. ,
.
(). ,
, , .

() .

,
.

6.

129

, , . , ,
.
, .
, .
, , ,
(. 6.3).

. 6.3

, , , -
. , , .
. ,
, , ,
(. 6.4).

. 6.4

, , , , , , .
, .

(. 6.5).
, , .
.
.
.
, , , ,

130

. 6.5

, , ,
(Hemsley, Doob, 1978).
- , . . ,
(),
, ,
.
,
, . .
, : ,
. , ,

. ,
, ,
- .
Personality and Individual Differences, ,
.
, , .
,
, .
, , - . - ,
, , ,
. ,
, . ,
,

6.

131

.
// .
. (LiveScience. 2012.11 )

. . , ,

.

6.3. -

,
. - .
. . ,
, .
, ,
,
- . , . .
(2008), , -
, .
. . , (12-) (1,95
0,001) (35-) (1,35
0,001). ,
,
. ,
, .
,
, .
, -
. 12-
8,85 0,001, 5,2 0,001.
, ,
.
, ,
, -
. , , , -

132

, , , . , ,
,
- ,
.
, . . (2008)
. ,
, ,
. , .

. . (2005),
,
. ,
, ,
.
. . ,

.

7.1. ,



, .
, , ,
.
.
, recruitment , , .
, .
- ,
-.

, ,
.

.

7.

135

, ,
.
, , .
, , , :
, ?
. , - . , , , ,
,
, , , ,
. . .
, , , ,
, .
, , , , , ,
;
, ;
.
, ,
, ,

. ,
, . , , .
,
,
.
: , ,
! . ,
, . ,
,
.
:
. ,
- ,
, . : , ,
, ,
.
, ,
, .
, , -

136

, . ,
, , : ? ,
, , , ?
, - :
!,
. , .
,
, . : ,
, ,
, .
. ?
, ,
, , , ,
.
, ,
.
,
, .
.
, :
.
: ? ,
, : ,
.
, ,
-.
, ,
.
.
, , ,
. :
-
. ,
, , ,
, .

, , .
, .1
, .
, , 1
( , .: . : patlah.net/biznes/biz-11/rabota/rabota-10.htm).

7.

137

, ,
.
, ,
. , ,
, .
. ,
, , , , ,
. ,
,
, -
.
. ,
, ,
. ,
. .

, .
, ,
, .
, . ., ,
.
, .
.
, , ,
, .
.
. ,
, ,
.
, : , ,
.
,
, , : .
, , , .
. , -

138

, . , ,
.
.
, ,
,
, ,
: , ,
?
. , ,
,
. ,
.
. . ,
, ,
.
, , . ,
, , , ,
, .
, , . .
, , ,
-
, , (
, , , ).
. // (www.patlah.ru)

. . (2005) ,
: , ;
;
, , .
,
.

7.2. /
.
.
(. . ,
1968; . . , 2007; . . , 2004; . . , 2007; . . , 2008; . , 2000; Kramer, 1999; Levicki, Bunker, 1996; Hazan, Shafer, 1987;
Holmes, 1991, .).

7.

139

, . .
, .
:
, .
,
, . (
), ,
. , .
.
:
1) ;
2) ;
3) , ,
,
.
,
. , , ,
: ?
: , ,
. ,
,
. .
: , , , .
: , , .
, ,
. ,
, .
. ., 2005. . 29


. , ,
, :
1) , , ;
2) , , , ( );

140

3) ( )
;
4) , ;
5) ;
6)
.

. , ,

, .
(Kramer, 1999).
, <> .
. (Messik, 1983) ,
, (. . ,
),

. ,
, .
. . (Brann, Foddy,1988) , . ,
.
, ,
,
. . , . . (Parks et al., 1996) ,

. ,

.

,
.
. ., 2008

, , , .
(. . , 2000; Eisenhardt, 1995; Granovetter, 1985; Hill, 1990, .).
/ . . . ,

7.

141

, .
,
. -,
, , ( ).
-, ,
, , . . ( ).

. ,
, -
( , .)
- . -,
, (
).
. , , - ,
,
. ,

.
, .
. , ,
,
.

.
. ., 2005. . 30

.
, . . (2000)
: ,
.
.
, ,
. ,
;
. ,
.

142

.
,
, , ,
,
.
, .
, ,
. , ,
, .
,
,
.
. ,
, . ,

.
; .
, , ,
,
. ,
. ,
, ; ;
. ,
.
, ( , ,
) (,
). . . ,
. ,
.
, . : , .
, :
.
,
.
, ,
,

7.

143

, : . ,
. ,
,
.

, ,
. , ,
,
.
. . , : , , , .
.
( ,
) ,
, -
, .
,
.
,
, .
.
, .
; ,
, , ,
, (. . , 2002; . . , 2006;
Aubert, Kelsey, 2003; Bain, Mann, Pirola-Merlo, 2001; West, 1990, .).
. . (2007) ,
(, , ), , : , ,
. (, , ) :
-, -, . .
,
,
,

.

, (
) ( ) .
-

144

,
,
, , .
,
.
,
.
,
.
, , . .
,
. , , , (
).
. . (Burt,
Knez, 1995) . ,
,
. .
(Uzzi, 1997), ,
, .
,
. :
, ,
,
.
. ,
IT- , , ,
.
,
. IT , .
. ., 2005. . 33

. . ,
() .
.
.

7.

145

, , (Miller, Cangemi, 1987).


. , : ; ; ;
;1 (, ); , .
2

, ;
.
, , .
, , .
. ,
, ,
.
,
; .
:


, ,
, ,
.

,


,

,
.

,

, . .
( ) ,
. ,
, . : ,
.
.
, () . :
1) ,
; 2) ,
. .
, , , , . .
. , .
2
: . . ., 2008.
1

146


,
,
.
,

/
.
.
:
,


,
,
.




.


,

. (Butler, 1991) ,
, , , , , , , , ,
.
. (Tyler, Degoey, 1996; Tyler et al., 1996) .
.
, . .
. ,
.
. . . . (Mayer, Davis, 1999)
:
( ),
( , ),
( ).

:
1) ;
2) , ,

, ;
3) ;
4) , ;
5) ,
;

7.

147

6) ,
;
7) .
. ., 1998

. . (2002),
/,
, .
,
, , .

.
, , (
) . , .

(
).
, , ,
.
, ,
Yahoo!.

,
, .
,
, (
).
1. . , ,
. ,
. ,
- ,
. , -
( , )
.
2. . .
, , -

148

. ', Career Pro, .



, .
3. . ,
. ,
, .
, ,
, .
, , ,
. -. , , ,
, .
4. . <>
, ,
, , .
: ,
.
5. . : ,
. . , ,
. ,
, .
6. , . .
( ), . ,
, ,
.
.
, . , . ,
.
// .
(2010. 29 )

,
. . (2004), ,
.
, , .

7.

149

,
, .
.

.
,
.

.
, .
- , . -
, ,
. ,
;
, .
, -
, ,
. ,
,
.
. .
,
, .
,
.
: 1) , . .
; 2)
, , ,
, ; 3)

.
.

.

150

: 1)
( , , , );
2) ,
, ; 3) ( , , , - ).
. ,
,
, ,
.
. ., 2004

. (Brockner, Seigel, 1996; Brockner et al., 1997)



. ,
, , ,
. ,
.

, , .
. , , : 1) ( ) ; 2) ,
; 3) , , ,
. ,
, . .; 4) ,
. .; 5)
(
; ,
).
. , ,
( ,
). ,
.
.
: 1)
, ; 2) ; 3)

7.

151

;
4) ,
; 5) .
,
, ; 6) :
, .
. ,
. ,
, , .
, ,
, :
1) ,
; 2)
, .
. . ,
.
. , .

, , , .
, ,
.
(, ) - .
,
( , !)
- . .
: . . 2122

,
.

. -,
,
. -,

. ,
,
.
,
.
,
, .
. ., 2008

152

. . . . (2008, 2009).

/.
, , , . ,
, ,
(6,1%), (1,6%), ,
. (87,1%),
(73,5%),
.
.
. , ,
. , ,
, , .
, ,
.
, .

,
, ,
.

, ,
.
.
. ,
.
, , ,
, , .
,
,
( ,
).
, -
, .

7.

153


, .
. ., 2002. . 4

. . . , , , .
,
, : ,
, , , ,
. . ,
,
, ,

.
, ,
, ,
, , ,
.
. . , -
.

.
, .
, ,
. . , .
.
.
,
.
, , . ,
, , , .
, ,
, .
. ., 2008

154

, . . ,
.
.
, , ,
.

. ,

. .
() .
,
,
. ,
.
. . , , ,
. .

,
.
,
.

. , ,
, . .
. . (1997),
.
, -,
; -,
; -,
, , . .
,
. ,
,
, .
. ., 2008

7.

155

. . ,
. , /
,
.
, (
, ,
)
.

, , , .
. . ,
, :

: , ;
: , ;
: , ;
: .

7.3.

. . ,
. ,
, , ,
, .

,
. ,
,
. , ,
. , ,
, , ,
, .
.
,
, , . ,
.

156

. . . . , -
.
-
.

, , ,

, .
. . , /
. . .
. ,


. ,
, .
,
,
(
),
.
. . . , ,
.
.
. ,
,
.
,
, . , . . ,

.
,
. ,
,
.

7.

157

7.4.
. , . . (Lewicky et al., 1997) , . , , , , .
,
. , .
, .
,
, , .
.
,
, - .
.
?

.
, .

. .
, , .

.

.
, .

,
, .
.
. .
,
, .
: . 2008

158

. : 1) , - ; 2)
; 3)
. , ,
.

: 1)
; 2) , ; 3) .
:
: ,
, .
,
. ,
, .
,
: , .
, ,
, . :
.

,
.
. , ,
. , , ,
, .
, ,
,
.

. ,
.
, -
, , ,
.
. ., 2005. . 33

7.

159

. . , , , ,
.
, , , , , , , .
- ,
, .
. .
,
.
. , ,
, , .
,
. ,
, . ,
, ,
. .
, , . . , . ,
, ,
: , , ,
.
, , ,
. . ,
,
.
, .

.
.
- , . .
.


,
. ,
.

160

1. , . ,
.
2.
, , , .
3. . , , .
4. .
,
( , ).
5. , , .
6. -
; ,
,
.
7. , , . ,
.
8. . ,
( ,
, -
).
9. .
, , , .
. ., 1998


(), ,
. . . , , ,
. .

. ,
.

7.

161

. . ,
.
.
, ,
, ,
. . ,
.
, , , ,

, ,
.
, . . .
. ,
, .
.
,
, , , .
,
. . ,
, ,
, .

. . , ,
, , , .

7.5.

. , , .

, .
,
. ,
.
,
, -

162

,
.
, . (1997), :

;
;
;
;
;
,
;
;
;
, , ;
;
, .

, , , , .
(. 7.1).

. 7.1.

7.

163

: ; ;
; ; ;
; ; ;
.
, . . (2002),
,
, , ,
.
? -, ,
, :
1. ? ,
:
. , , .
2. ?
, - , ,
,
, .
3. - ? ,
. ,
,
.
4. ?
, , , ,
. , .
- , , .
,
.
-, , , , .
-,
. ,
: ,
.
, .
-, ,
.
-, ,
, , ,

164

. .
,
.
,
. ,
.
, , , .
, , ,
. ,
.
, .
.
,
. , .
, .
, :
,
; , ; ; ,
; ;
; .

. . (Carkhuff, 1984)
:
20% ;
20% ,
( , , -?);
20% , , , ,
, , 40%
;
20% , . , , ,
.
,
,
.
.
: .
,

7.

165

.
,
,
. , , - .
,
. , , .

.
: . ,
, . ,
, :
, ,
,
. ,
, - .
: , . , ,

, , , , .

. , .
: , ,
, .
. ., 2005. . 35

,
.
, ,
.
,
( ), .

7.6. ,
,
. 1930- ., , , ,

166

: ? ,
.

. (. , . , .
) , 1 , .
, ,
. , , ,
.
, . ,
,
. , :
) , ;
) ,
(
;
);
) ,
, (. . , 2005).
, ,
. . ,
, :
1.
: ,
.
.
.
2. . ,

, .
, , .
35 ,
. ,
, ,
.

.
3.
,
.
,
.
1

8.1.

. ,
( ), .
,
.
.
, . . , .
,
, .
, . . (2007) ,
.
.

. ,

.
. . ,
. ,
,
, .
, ,
( )
.

168

8.2.
(, , ),
() . .
?
, ,
. ,
, ,
. -
, ,
. .
1990- . ,
.
, .
, .
,
. , ,
,
.
,
. , ,
. ,1
, .

, (Sztompka, 1999).
,
, .
,
.
, : 1) ,
, ;
2) , ; 3) ; 4) ; 5)
; 6)
(Sztompka, 1999).
,
, ,
(Barber, 1983). , (. . , 2008).
1

8.

169

:
, ,
( ,
,
).
? ( ,
).1
.
. .

. ,
.

(Klein, 1997), , ,
(Dodd, 1994).
.
,
.
. ,
,
, .
.
, ,
, . ,
, .
,
(. . , 1999).
(. .
),
, (, )
. - /
.
. . ,
,
.

1
,
, . ,
, , 1998 .,
(. . , 2008).

170

8.3.

, ,
,
. : ,
, (fairness)
,
(opportunustically) (Zaheer et al., 1998).
.
.

. , :
, , -, . ?
,
. , , , ,
, ,
.
. .
, .
, ,
. , ,
, . , ,
,
, .

. .
. ,
. ,
, : ? ,
. , ,
: , . ,
.
.
1
, , . (Cummings, 1996),
(Lorenz, 1988), (Williamson, 1993). ,
. . (2002), . . (2011), . .
(2009), . . (2011) .

8.

171

, , , .
. 2009. 1


, . .
. . (2010),
.
.
, , , , ,
.

. , ,
, .
:
, , , : , - ( ).
, -
,
, -.
: ,
.
, , ,
, !
.
,1 ,
,
,
.
:
, , 95% . ,
90% .
80%, -
, , ;
, .
: ,
1
,
1962 1984 ., . .: ., . . .
- . ., 2007. (Levitt,
Dubner. Freakonomics: a rogue economists explores the hidden side of everything. N.Y., 2005.)

172

, , ,
;
, , (
) , . ,
, ,
, ;
;
, , , -, ,
;

. ,
;
, , (, , , ,
?).


.
- ,
: .
: , ,
, ,
?
, , ,
, .
,
, . ,
: ,
-
.
, , ,
, . , , ,
.

,
.
, , -,
, .

8.

173

- ,

, , , ,
. , ,
, 90%, , , 10%
. , ,
, -
.
, , ,
(. 58).
, ,
,
. . . , .

- ,
- . -, , . ,
.
(, - .), .

( , ). ,
().1
,
, ,
,
, .
. . 2006
. , .
,
, .
, -, ,
.
, ,
.
. ,
. McDonalds. 12 .

. , .
, : ,
, (. . , 2006).
1

174


, ,
.
,
.
. (2006) ,
, ,
: ( ), , .
. , . (1997), . (1994), .
(Williamson, 1993). . -, . , . (Guha-Khasnobis et al.,
2006) (linking)
.
. ., 2011. . 5

:
,
.
, .
.
, , ,
,
. . , . . ,
( ).
;
, - ,
,
().
. ., 2008. . 3

. . (2008) ,
. , ,
.
,
.
,
. -

8.

175

. ,
, ,
.
. . (Beugelsdijk, Smulders, 2003, 2004)
. . ,
,
.
, .
,
,
. ,
,
. , , , ,
.
. ., 2007

. . (2011) ,

,
( )
( ).
, ,
(
,
). ,
, ,
.
. . : , ( , X. )
, ,
.
: ,
, ,
, - ,
. . , ,
.
, - .

.
, -

176


.
. . ,
.
. . (2006)
. ,
: ,
, ,
, .
, ,
, . , , ,

.
,
. . , : )
,
; ) ; )
; )
.
, . . ,
, .
, .
. -
. : ,
(),
, .

8.4.

. , , ( )
, .
,
.

. , .

8.

177

?1
, , , . ,
, .
,
, . ,
. , , .
, , ,
, , ,
. . . , , ,
. :
, .
. .
, ,
. ,
.

: , ,
, .
,
, , . , , , .

. , ,
.
. ,
,
. , ,
.
.
( ) , , , .
,
. , , ,
.
, .

, . ,
1

(works.tarefer.ru/100027/index html).

178

,
, : , .

. , ,
, .
?
(. , 1999; Cialdini, 2001).
: , ,
. , ,
, (... ...),
.
: , ,
,
, . , ,
,
, , ,
.
.
- .
, -
.
, ,
, : . ,
, - , ,
, ,
.
, , .
. ; , , ,
, ,
. .
, . ,
. ,
, , .
:
, .
(Burger).
, , ,
,

8.

179

(
). ,
.
: . ,
,
(. ).
, ,
.
, , , , . - , - .
, ,
- .
.
-
, : , , - , .
, ,
,
.
.
(Wilson) (Darke) , .

, . , ,
.
, .
, , ,
, , .
, ,
, ,
, , , . , , ,
, .
, ,
, ( , , ,
) .
,
, ,
.
,

180

, ,
.
, ,
,
, . , ,
,
.
, , ,
. ,
, .
(akme.su/novosti/22213/page/1/)

,
. ,
.
,
,
, , .
,
.
,

, .
. ,
- , . ,
. , ,
,
. ,
. .
, . (Hornik, 1992) ,

,
.
. , ,

, ,
. ,
. , ,
, ( 2 4%).
, , . , -

8.

181


. , ,
.
. , , ,
, .
, - ,
-,
. ,
.
, (!) ,
.
. . . , ,
.
,
.
. , , , . ,
.
.
, , . .

.
, ?

. . ,
.
,
.

. ,
, , .
.

, ,
, .
, ,
, , , .
,
. ,
( ) . -

182

, .
.
,
.
.
. , , ,
. , , , ,
.
, ,
, , ,
.

(ww2.futoscaut 24.ru/advisor-ru/ article/173956/147552)

8.5.

. . (2008), ,
, .
. . .
,
( ) ,
, , , . ,
, , , ,
.
,
, .
( ),
,
. ,
. : , .
.
. . . . (2000), . . . . (1996), . . (1996), . . ,
. , . . , . .
1

8.

183

. , , ,
, .
. 1880 .
14 17 , ,
.
., 2004. . 309

. ,
, , ( ) :

;
;
;
( );
-;
(
,
).

. .
, .
, . ,
. , . ,
.
. , . ,
. ,
,
.
,
, , , (Arkes, 1990).
, , .
. , .
, .
, .

184

, . ,
, .
, :
, ( ,
). , , ,
(), , . .
.
, , , , , ,
, . ,
. .
, (
). , . .
, , . ,
. . : , , .
, , , , ,
, , , .
, , .
.
, , .
( ),
, . ,
. .
, . . .
.
, , , , . , , -
, .
, .
, .
, ,
,
,
(/ ), , ,
.
, , , , .
, , , ,
. ,
. ,
.

8.

185

, , , , . .
, .
:
. , ,
- , -,
, , -.
. ;
,
,
.
. . ,
,
.
( . 2011. 19 )

. . . . (1996) ,
:
;
-
-. ,
, . , - . : ,
!;
, ,
,
, .
;
.
. . (1996, 2003, 2005) , , , , .
,
.
, , -
. (63%)
.
( 30%).

186

. . (2005) , , ,
. , ,
, , , ,
. ,
, .
/
. ( ), : , , ,
. , . . , ,
.
, -


. ( 13%) , .
,
.
. () .
. . (2002) , , - .
, -,
, - -.
,
. -, .
.
-, . . -, ,
(. . , . . , 2003). ,
.
,
.
. . , , ,
: ,
, , , . ,
, ,
, .

8.

187

. . (2000) ,
, , , .
, ,
. . ,
/ .
. . , .
,
. ,
, ,
.
/
. ,
, . ,
, , ,
. ,
,
.
, ,
, .
, ,
( ) .
, , : ; ; ;
; ; ;
; ; ; .
. <>
, ,
,
, , . .
. , , , ,
/.

. <> . , .
, .

188

,
.

. , ,
, , .
,

.
-.
, /
. , , -
,
, . ,

. , ,
,
, . . ,
, .
, ,
. ,
.
. // .
? (kontakty.com.ua)


.
,
.
, , , ,
.
, .
,
.
.
.

. , , 4%
, 96% , . .

, .

8.

189

, , 60%
,
, , , . (, , )
15% . , ,
.
... : , . , .
. .


, , buzz.
1864 ., ,
, .
, , . , .
. buzz ,
, , ,
, .
?
,
;
, .
, ,
,
.

, 100 , , 6
, 28 , 35 , , (31)
.
, .
25% , ,
47, 19,
10%. ,
, ,
. , .

190


.
,
. ,
. , , .
.
(www.sxc.hu)

. . . . (2002) , . ,
,
,
, ,
.

,
. , () ()
. ,
(. , 2004, 2005; . (Luhman,
1979), . , 2003; . , 2001; . , 2002; . , 1999;
. (Sztompka, 1998, 1999) .).
. 1
.
.
, .
, , ,
.
, , .
(. , . , 1999; . . , 2001;
. . , 2003; . . , 2001; . . , 2000, 2001; . . , 2005;
. . , 2005; . , 1999; . . , 2005, .).

9.1.
, (Hetherington, 1998),
. 1
. . , 10%
( 810),
3040 . 40% ,
.

192

(
7%),
.
. . . . (2002) , -
, ;
, ,
;
,
, .
. . . . (2012). ,
.1 ( )
- , . ,
- ,
, .
: ,
. , , ,
,
. , . , . . . . ,
,
( ) .
,
.
. . . .
. () , ,

().
, ,
, . . , ,
, . ,
, . . , ,
, , .
, ,
. , 1
. : .

9. -

193

.
. , -,
.
, , -
, .
, ,

.

9.2.

. .
.
, . (2004),
, ,
( ).
; ,
, ,
. .
: ,
(, , ), (, ), (,
),
.
. ,
;

, -
.
.

. ,
. <>

. , . ,
,
.
. ., 2011. . 5

194

,
, . . , ,

. ,
, , . .

.
. ., 2007. . 6

. . (2004), /
. ,
,

. , .
, ,
.
, 2012 .
: 10%.
, .
56% .
,
.
, . ,
- .

,
.
(83,3%), (75,4%), (60,9%).
: 11,3% , 17,0%.
. 9.1.
,
:
-
.
: ,
,
.

9. -

195

9.1. , 2009 . (. . )

, %

2,44

12,1

39,6

29,6


11,5

2,65

8,5

35,4

32,3

19,1

2,73
2,70
2,95

8,1
8,7
3,1

28,1
33,3
20,6

33,6
33,8
32,6

20,4
21,6
22,8

2,58

6,9

40,5

36,3

13,7

.

(51,7%). (43,9%),
(42,0%) (36,2%). , ,
. ,
.

.
.
32,6%,
48,9,
49,9,
58,8%. ,
79,8%.

(75,9%),
, ,
(64,5%), (55,3%).
: , ,
. , , 2007 .
, , 75% 1624 ,
, 55
53%.
- (59% 68% ),
(53% , ,

196


, 68 64%).
, , ( 50%),
- 31% ,
.
: ,
4443% ,
32%.

- 13% , ,
30% ,
.
, ,
.

9.3.
, ,
.
,

.
,
, , .
(-),
, , .
, , ,
,
.
. ., 2005. . 3


, , .
. . (2005) - ,

9. -

197

: 1)
, ,
, ;
2) ,
: , , , ; 3) : ,
, , ; ,
; 4) - : , , .
, , , .
. . ,
. , , , , , , , , .
,
, .
, ,
, , , .
. . ,
: , , , , , .
,
,

. ,
24 14% .

. ,
, .
, . ,
,
.
. . // . :

198

. . (2004) , , ,
(78,4%), , (77,0%),
(65,5%).
, , . , , , , ,
.
,
.
. . (2012) ,
, ,
, , , , ,
, ,
.
: ,
, , ,
, .

. ,
,
,
,
,
. <>

.
.
, -, . ,


, ,

,
. -, . ,
-
,

. -, . ,
. -, . .

9. -

199

.


, ,
,
.
. .

/
.
. . , - (, ) ,
.
, , , , , ( Q4 ),
65% ,
.
, , , , , , ,
, ,
, , .
35% .
, ,
( 42% )
, , , ( ). ,
, .
, . . , .
, , .
. . ,
:

( );
;

, ;
, ,
.
, ,
. , 2005 . (

200

) 5 8%. 2011 . ,
. ,
:
17% (. . , 2006).
, . ,
,
. (55,7%)
-, 45,6% ,
. (31,5%) ,
( 100%,
).
. ,
,
.

(Lifetime Learning Model: LTLM).

, ,
.


, ( )
,
,
. <>

Interpersonal Trust Political Trust .
,
: 1)
(, , , , , () , ); 2)
( , , , ), 3)
. , ,

, , ( ) .
, , , , , ( 69 50% ).

9. -

201


.

(46%).
39%, 43, (-) 35% . (12% ).

(Initial Trust)
, ,
.


,
.

( ), 37 :
49% .
(26%) , (25%)
. ,

.
. ., 2005

(64%) ;
(56%) ; 73% , ,
2% (
); 68% ,
, 6% ,
1% , 20% .
8% , 14%
.
(regions.ru/news/2406897)

9.4.
, ,
, .
.
, , ,
, (. . , 1992;

202

. , 1996; . . ., 2003; Miller et al., 1976).


, , , 190 , ,
, 110 .
.
, ,
(Smith, Schaffer, 1991).
.
:
1. . ,
. , ,
.
2. ,
. ,
.
3. ,
. ,
, .
.
4. .
, , - ,
.
.
? :
. : . .
, ,
,
.
, , , . .

10

10.1.
.
.
.
: ,
. ? ? ,
?
;
,
. :
, ,
: , -; , -,
, ,
, :
, ; ,
.
, ,
.
, , ,
( ,
.) .
,
, , , .
463 .
: ?

204

: 54%, 42%, 4%.


, ,
.
, .
, , :
61%, 3%, 34%.
, 37% , , .
, , 42%
.
.
, , , , .
, , ,
,
.
complince ()
.
,
, , ,
.
. , ,
, , , , .
57% , ,
.
: ?
: 35%, 33, 32%.
: ?
: 49%, 25, 26%.
., ., 2009

, ,
, .


Amgen, Inc. 53
,
. , . Amgen
,
.
: 47 53 . <>

10.

205

, ,
.
, <> . , ,
, .
, ,
,
,
. , , : , ,
, ,
.
, Bayer AG.
: ,
, ,
.
, Bayer, , ,
, .
(), Merck, , , ,
.
, .
,
- <> <> ,

, , , .
// (compulenta.ru)

, ,
, , .
/
.
. . . ,
( , , ),
(, , , ,
, ), .
, ,
. ,
,

206

,
, , ,
.
. . ,
.
, .

, .
(, ) .
()
, . ,
, ,

,
.
. . ,
, : -,

; -, /
. .
. .
-, - .
,
.

,
.

.
(. . - , ). ,
, . ,
. ,
, . . .
12 24 . . , ,

12 , ?

10.

207

,
,

.
, . . (2009), .
: ?,
: - .
(. , . , 2009) ,
-.
, ,
, . , , , ,
, .
, ,
.
, , , :
?
1. 63%.
2. , 28%.
3. 12%.
?
1. 67%.
2. , 27%.
3. 7%.
: , , ,
.
:
?
1. 88%.
2. 12%.
., ., 2009

.
. , (),

208

,
, .
, , , ,
, .
.

, .
, . ,
: ,
. ,
.
: ( , ); (
); ( ); ().
,
, , . , , , , ,
, .

, ,
, ,
, .
, , , .
,
, , , ,
. , ,
, , ,
, .
. , ,
, .
, , , .
. ,
.
.

10.

209

.
,
, , ,
, , .
, ( , ), ,
, , (
).
, , , ,
, ,
.
, ,
,
, .
. , ,
, , , ,
- , ,
, , ,
. , , ,

, .
,
,
.
., ., 1974. . 236

:
, , , ,
, , , .

10.2.
.
. ,
, ,
, .

. , (Jourard, 1968, 1971; Allan, 1980), ,

, .

210

, . (2000),
,
. , . ,

( ) ( ).
: ,
? ,
,
, ,
.
,
,
. .
,
, , , . .
, , (Friedman, 1989),
. .
, ,
, .
(/, ?)
( ?
? ?). .
, .
, .
.
, , ,
.
, .
.
, .
, ,
, ,
, .
, , -, ,
, -, ,
. ,
.
, . ,

10.

211

.
, ,
( ), ,
, . . ,
.
, , ,
( ),
.
, ,
, . ,
, , , ,
.
., . // .
.

,
, ,
,
. .
.
.
.
(Dies, 1983)
; ,
, .
,

. (. . ) ,
. , , , , ,
,
.
, . , ,
, ,
- .

10.3.

. . . 1 , 1

(17461827) .

212

, ,
,
. , , ,
.
. . 1 , ,
. . ,
,
, , . ,
, -
, .
.
. . , . , . .
XIX . . . ,
,
, ,
.
. . , .
,
(1982).
. .
,
, ( ,
).
, , ,
(
).2 ( ),3
.
.
, ,
.
.
, .
? ,
, ,

(15921670) .
, ,
( . 2012. 29 ).
3
. : ? // . 2007.
1.
1
2

10.

213

, , , ,
, .
.
:
,
, , .
,
, , ,
, . , ,
.
.
, , .
,
,
. ,
, , ,

. ,
.
,
. ,
:

,
, ,
?
:
,
, .
.
?
:
.
.
, .
. , ...
.
: ,

214

.
, . - , -
, - !
. .
, ,
, , .
, , -,
...
.
. ,
.
,
:
, . ,
, .
:
. .
,
? !
?
.
, .
.
. . .
, , !
, , .
, , .
,
.
. : ,
. :
, ? .
, . , . , , .
, : .
, , ,
, :
! , , .
.
: . : , ,

10.

215

, , . . .
, ,
. , .
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
1618- 35-!
: .
( )
. , - ,
.
.
, ,

. ,

.
, .
.

. . (2002) .
, ,
,
. , ,
,
, ,
, .
,
.
. . (2008)
. ,
. , ,
,
.

.

216

( ) .
,
, , :
)

, ;
, ;
; . , , ,
, , ,
;
)

: ; , ;
; ;
;
) : , , ;
, , ; .
. . ,
.
.
,
. ,
, , . , ,
.
,
, .
,
, . , , , , ,
.
( (
),
,
.
! , .)

10.

217

. . (1991) , ,
.
, .
.
, , , . . . ,
,
.
.
, , -
.
. , , , , .
. . ,
.
, , - , ,
, , . ,
, - , ,
, , .
, , -
, .
, ,
, , , .
. // . ?
(portal-slovo.ru)

, , , .
, , .
,
.
,
. ,
, .
, :
, .
;
,
,
;

218

, ,
, ,
, .
, . , .
, , , ,
.
1992 . , 6000 .
, - . , 40
70% .
,
.
. ., 1999. . 208

. ,
.
. ,
. , ,
(. . ,
. . , 2010).
, . ,
, ,
.
.
. . , .

.
, .
. . ,
,
.
: - , - . . -,

10.

219

.
, , . -,
,
. , .
, . . (1961), ,
, ,
, , , ,
, , ,
.
. . (1999) , .
, -
. ,

.
( ), ,
.
,
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
. , ,
,
.
.

, ,
, .
. , ,
, , ,
.
(. . , 2006; . . , 2000; . . , 2002; . . , . . , 2001; . . , 1998). . .
, ,
, ,
, , - .

220

. .
, , ,
, .
, .

. .
, ; .
. , ,
, , . .

,
.
. : ,
.
. ., . ., 2003. . 50

- , ,
.
, . , , ,
. . ,
, .
.
. . , . . , ,
. ,
, , .
. .
. . (1998) , ,
, . ,
, 39,4% , 38,3%
, 28,7%
. ,
.
, . . ,
(15%) ; 22%
,

10.

221

.
.
. . , , , . ,
. . . , , , , 5,3% , 24,4%
, 26,6%
.
, , , ,
. , ,
(, ,
, , , , , . .).
, , ,
( ,
, ). , , , ,
, .
, -.
, .
, , , . ,
, , , , ,
, , . <> -
, ,
, , , .
, , ,
, , , , . ,
-.
. ., 2003. . 128

. . ,
(
- ), , ,
. ,

222

, , , , .
,
. ,
. .
,
. , ,
. , , . , . ,
, .
.
. ,
.
. , , , .
. .

.
. .
. , ,
.
, , .
. ,
, . .
. ,
.
. -

.
.
.
. ,
.
,
. ,
,
PISA .
: PISA-.
,

10.

223

. ? .
, ?
.
, .
,
, ,
. ,
, , ( )
. , .
,
,

, ( ) . ,
.
, , .
:
, , , . , , . -,

. -, ,
.
, , , .

. ,
,
, .
, .
- ,
.
, .
.
. (Alppilan) .
,
(non-grade system).
? 79- (
,
) , .
, 38
,
1/5 . , -

224

.
, ,
.
( ,
), , ( ),
, .
, -
, ,
.
, , ,
.
, : ,
.
. // . 2009. 10

?
.
.
,
. , ,
. ,
, .
,
.
, ,
, .

.
, (. . , 1983).
( ,
) . ,

. ,
.
.
, , . . ,
.
. , .

10.

225

. ,
, .
, , . .
.
, . ,
. .
,
, . ,
, , .
,
, ,
.
.
,
.
, . , ,
: ,
, . , , ,
; ,
, .
, , .
, .
.
. , , ,
, , , .
.
.
.
. (Milligan et al., 2004; Nie et al., 2002) ,

. (. . ,
2011) (. 10.1). ,
5%.
. , ,
, .

226

. 10.1.


.
.

, .

10.4.

, - .
-, .

-.
- .

10.

227

- , .
, , . :

.
, .

,
.
, , .
. . (2000) ,
, :
- ;
,

;
,

, ;
.

11


( )
(. . , 2000; . . , 2003).
. . ,
, ,
. (),
, , .
. . (2007) ,
,
, ,
, ,
, , .
, ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
.

11.1.
- . .
(20072011).
. . (2011) ,
.

, . ,

11.

229

,
, .
,

,
. ,
,
: -,
,
-, .
,
. ,
( ,
) . ,

.
:
, ,
. /,
. 17,8%.

- ,
, .
, :
, ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
-
,
,
,
.

,
, . . ,

- . ,
,

230


, ,

.
,
.
. . . ,
, , ,
.
, .
, . . ,
-
, ,
- ,
.

, , ,
.
. . ,
-, ; -,
,
; -, ,
.

, , , ,

. , ,
, , ,
, , .

11.2.

. . (2010): .

11.

231

- , , ;
, , .
, .
-
,
, . , , -
, ( ) .

, .
- ,
,
,
. ,
, . ,
.
- .
, , .
-
. -
,
, .
-

, . ( )
, ( ,
)
.
. -,
( )
, .
- ,
. , ,
. ,

232

.
, - ,
.
. .
:
,
,
;
, ;
,
, .
;

, .
, .
. . ,
.
-, , ,
, ,
.
- , ,
,
. , , ,
,
.
-, ,
.
. -
.
-,
.
,
.


- . . // . ., 1989.
. . -
: . . . . --, 2005.
. . ., 2003.
. . //
: . ., 2006.
. . // -
. : . . . , 2006.
. . , : // .
. . 2007. 4.
. . : .
. ... . . , 2007.
. . , : //
. 2008. 7.
. . . . ., 2008.
. . //
. : . , 2009. . 151. . 5.
. 1.
. . // . :
. ., 2001. 1 (3).
. . // XXI . , 2002. . 1.
. . // -2002: - . ., 2002. . 5.
. . // . . : . . . ., 2002.
. . // . :
. ., 2002. 2 (5).
. . , //
. 2003. . 1.
. . - . ., 2003.
. . - // .
2003. 2 (6).
. . -
// XXI : : : 2 . . , 2004.
. . - //
. ., 2004. . 53.
. . : - . ., 2004.
. . //
XXI : . .; , 2005.
. . : - // . 2005.
1 (9).
. . // .
2005. 2 (10).

234

. . //
/ . . . . , 2005.
. . // XXI : 2 . / . . . . , 2005. . 1.
. . - //
. ., 2005.
. . - // :
: - / . .
. . . ., 2005.
. . : -
: : . , 2006. . 1.
. . // . 2006. . 4.
. . : . . - . , 2006.
. . - . ., 2006.
. . : .
. . . ., 2000.
. . // . 2010.
3.
. . :
: XIV . ., 2007.
. . : : XII . .,
2007.
. . //
: : XV .
., 2008.
. . , , // : , :
. , 2008.
. . //
: . ., 2008.
. . //
: - .
., 2009.
. .
// : . . ., 2010.
. . - //
: : . ., 2010.
. . //
. . . . 2010. . 16. 1.
. .
// . 2010. 3 (psyedu.ru).
. . : // . , 2010.
. .
: . . . . ., 2011.
- . // . .
11: . 2010. 2.
. .
: . . . . ., 2007.

235

. . //
. , 1997.
. . // XXI . , 1999. . 1.
. . ., 2007.
. . : , , // . . . . 2009.
. . //
- :
. ., 2010.
. . : //
- . 2010.
. . : . . .
. ., 2011.
. . //
. 1997. 2 (146).
. . : .
. . --, 2002.
. . // , , :
: . . , 2004. . 2.
. . // . 2001. 2.
. . . ., 2000.
A. B., . . . ., 2010.
., . . ., 1995.
. . // -2002: . ., 2002.
. . . ., 2003.
. . //
. 2005. 1.
. . :
. . ... . . ., 2006.
., . ., . . . , 2005 (cjnf.stavsu.ru).
. . : . . . . --, 2000.
. . . ., 2000.
. (wciom.ru).
. . - //
-2010: . ., 2010. . 1.
. . -
: . . . ., 2012.
. . //
. 2012. 1 (09) (sisp.nkras.ru).
X. : //
. . : .
2010. 2.
., . . ., 1997.
. . ., 1990.
., ., . ., ..
: - // . 2004. 2.

236

. . // / . . . . .,
2004.
. . //
/ . . . . ., 2004.
. . // / . . .
. ., 2004.
. . / //
/ . . . . ., 2004.
. ., . ., . . . // / . . . . ., 2004.
. . ., 1978.
. ., . . // . :
. 2000. 1.
. . // . 1998. 1011.
. . : . .. . . ., 1994.
. : // . : . 1999. 4; 2000. 1.
. . // . 2005. 2.
. . // . 2010. 3.
C. B., . . (delorus.com).
. // . 1997. 1.
. . ., 2004.
. : . ., 2005.
. , , // .
: 2 . ., 1991. . 2.
. // .
. : . ., 1994. 3.
. . : . . ... .
. --, 2004.
. . //
. 1997. 4.
. . // . 2000. 1.
A. A. // . 2010. 3.
. // . . : . 2010. 2.
. ., . ., . . . ., 2008.
. .
// - / . . . .
--, 2006.
. : // 227 (1267) (vedomosti.ru).
. . / //
. 2007. 2.
. ., . .
( ) // . 2010. 3.
. . = Trust: . ., 1999.
. . // -. 1999.
1.
. . // . 1999. 5/6.

237

. . : . -
. ., 2000.
. : //
. 2002. 4.
. . // : . ., 2000.
. .
// , , : : . .; , 2004. . 1.
. . : . . . . ., 2006.
A. A. // : . 2006. 4.
. ., . . // -2002: - . ., 2002.
. . //
. 2004. 8.
. . // III
. ., 2003. . III.
- : . . --, 2006.
(iriss.ru).
. . :
. . ... . . --, 1999.
. . // : - . --, 2005.
. . // - / . . . . --, 2006.
. . : :
- . --, 2006.
. . / : -
// . --, 2007.
. . // .
., 2007.
. . : : IV
. . --, 2007.
. . / //
. --, 2008.
. . : . --,
2008.
. ., . . // . 1997.
3 (7).
. // . 2003. 1.
. .
: . . ... . . --, 2000.
. . // :
: - . ., 2004.
. .
// - / . . .
. --, 2006.
. . : - . ., 1994.
. . //
. 1998. 11/12.
C. B. - // - . ., 2006.

238

. // .
. : . 2007. 2.
. . , , . ., 1995.
. ., . ., . ., . . - // -2002: - . ., 2002.
. ., A. A. //
: . ., 2003. . 3.
. . : - // . 1995. 3.
. ., . .
// -2002: - . ., 2002.
. ., . . (narcom.ru).
., . // . 1999. . II. . 4 (soc.pu.ru).
. . - : . . .
. ., 2007.
. ., . . :
// - / .
. . . , . . . ., 1998.
. . // , , : : -
. .; , 2004. . 1.
. . : . . . . .,
2004.
. . //
. 2003. 1.
. . // . : .
2003. 45.
. . ( ) //
. . : . 2001. 18.
. . . ., 1992.
. . . ., 2001.
. . . ., 1998.
. ., . .
// : .
VI - . , 2011.
. ., . .
// . 2012. 1 (09) (sisp.
nkras.ru).
. . // . 2008. 7.
., . ,
// : : . . .,
2009. . 18
. . // . 1998. 4.
. . // . 1998. 7.
. // . 2000. 2.
. . . , 2001.
. . . ., 1999.
. . . , 2002.
. . // . 2005. 2.

239

. . // - : .
., 2005.
. . // . ., 2007. . II.
. . - //
- . , 2008.
. . // . 2008.
12.
. .
: . . . . ., 2009.
. ., . . - //
: . . . 57. , 2005.
. // . 1998. 1.
. . (spishy.ru).
. . , : (perspectivy.info/rus/nashe).
. . // I :
- . ., 2008.
. . // . , 2001.
. . . ., 1982.
. . //
: .
., 2002.
. . // / .
. . . ., 2004.
. . : //
/ . . . . ., 2004.
. ., ., . . , // . . , 1997.
. . //
. . 5. , 1998.
. . // . 2006. 4.
. . -
(pws-conf.ru).
. . // . 2008. 4.
. . // . 2009. 1.
. . . . . ., 2004.
. . ,
: . . ... . . --, 2003.
. . // -2004. , , :
. ., 2004.
. ., . . //
- / . . . . --, 2006.
. . , //
. H. A. . 2008. 3.
. . -
: . . . . ., 2010.
. ., . . ,
- // . 2009. 4.
. . , , : . . ... .
. , 2003.

240

. ., . . //
-2010: . ., 2010. . 1.
. . . ., 1988.
. .
: . . . . ., 2003.
. ., . . // . ., 1996.
. // . 2003. 9 (rusreforms.ru).
. . : . .
. . , 2006.
. . : . . . . , 2001.
. . ., 1978.
. // . 2001.
3.
. : . ., 2000.
. .
// - / . . . . -, 2006.
. ., . .
// . 2003. 3.
. . : : .
. . . ., 1988.
. . : // . 1998. 8.
. . //
. 1999. 12.
. . //
. , 2000. . 1. . 7.
. . //
: . , 2001.
. . // IV
- :
. ., 2001. . 1.
. . // :
.
: . ., 2002. . 5.
. . . . : / .
. . . ., 2002.
. . -
// . . . . 2005. 3.
. .
// : -
. , 2006.
. . . ., 2008.
. ., . .
// :
: - . , 2005.
. ., . . // . 2007. 2.
. ., . .
//
. 2009. 2.

241

. ., . . // . 2012. 1 (psy.edu).
. . ? (uirussia.msu.ru)
. . // .
1996. 6.
. . . ., 2003.
. . // . ., 2005. . 2.
. . // : . ., 2000.
. . // :
. 2001. 3.
. . , 1977.
. . // . 1996. 1112.
. . , . ., 1997.
. . : .
. ... . . ., 2000.
. . . //
. ., 1970.
. . :
. . ... . . ., 2005.
- . // .
. : . 2010. 2.
. . // . 2002.
. 7.
. : 3 . ., 1985.
P. M. . ., 2005.
. ., . . // - /
. . . . --, 2006.
. . : // CREDO NEW. 2005. 3 (credonew.ru).
. // . 2003. 1.
. . // . 2003.
11.
. . - . ., 2004.
. . : : .
. ... - . --, 2009.
. . ., 1997, 2004.
. , . ., 2004.
. . //
. 1983. 5.
. ? // . 2000. . 12.
. . : //
. 2010. 3.
. .
: . . ... . . , 2002.
. .
// . 2001. 5.
. ., 2001.

242

: 30.04.2008 (bd.
fom.ru).
. ., . .
// . 2011. 5 (53) (creativeconomy.
ru).
. . - // . ., 1998.
. . // . 1998.
4.
. . : . ., 2009.
. . : : . . ... . . , 2000.
: - - (levada.ru).
. . - : .
. . . ., 1999.
. . , , . ., 2004.
., . ,
? // . 2000. 3.
. . . ., 1984.
. // THESIS. 1994. 5.
. .
// . : . 2008. 6.
. . : // .
2011.
. //
- . , 1989.
. . : , , , //
. 2005. 6.
. . //
. ., 2006.
. //
. 1900. . 52.
., ., . // .
2006. 1(fbk.ru).
. . . ., 1997.
. . , //
. ; ., 1996. . 7.
. . . ., 2002.
. . // . 2010.
3.
. . // . 2000. 12.
. . : //
. 1998. 11/12.
. .
// . ., 1977.
. . : . ., 2003.
. . // . 2000. 1.
. . : :
. . . . ., 2004.
. . // : . . /
. . . . . . , 2007.

243

. .
: . . . . --, 2005.
. . // XXI . , 2008. . 2.
. ., . . // - / . . . .
--, 2006.
. . // , ,
: : - .
.; , 2004. . 1.
. . : -
// . ., 1971.
. . . ., 1979.
. . // -2011:
: . ., 2011.
. ., . // . 1994. 3.
. . (spb.
ru).
. . -
: . . ... . . , 2000.
: ? (wciom.ru).
. . . ., 2006.
. ., . . ,
// - / . . . .
--, 2006.
. . : - : . .
. . , 2011.
. .
(tmnlib.ru).
. . : //
. 2008. 2.
.-. : . ., 1998.
. : // . 1999. 4.
. . : . . ... . . ., 1967.
. . : . . . . ., 1977.
. . -: . . .
. --, 2010.
C . P. , -
// , , : : - . .; , 2004. . 1.
. . , . , 1961.
., . ., . ., . .
( ) // . 2010. 2.
., . ., . ., . . ( ) // . 2010. 2.
. . : . . . . ., 1978.
. . // . ., 1981.
. . ., 2002.
. . // . 2007. 2.

244

. . // .
1998. . 3.
. . . --, 2001.
. ., . . // . 2001. 2.
. ., . ., . .
. , 2011.
A. B., . . :
// - . 2006. 4.
A. B., . . : -
. --, 2007.
. . : . . . . -, 2007.
., . . (medvestnik.ru).
. . , // . 1999. 6.
. . : //
/ . . . . ., 2004.
. . :
. . . . ., 1996.
. . // - . ,
1983.
. .
// . .,
1984.
. . // . , 1984.
. . : .
. ... . . ., 1984.
. .
//
/ . . . , . . . ., 1984.
. .
// . ., 1987.
. . // . --, 1990.
. . // . 1995. . 1. . 2.
. .
// - - . -, 1997.
. . // . 1997. . 2.
. . (- ). --, 1997.
. . // .
1998. 3.
. . - : . . - . -, 1998.
. . // . 1998. 2.
. . // . 1998.
1.
. . (- ). --, 1998.

245

. . // . 1999. 5.
. . . ., 2000.
. . // . 2001. 1.
. . . --, 2002.
. . . ? // . . ., 2004.
. . .
// - : /
. . . . /: - , 2006.
. .
- // - / .
. . . --, 2006.
. . - -
// - / . . . .
--, 2006.
. ., . . - // .
: . --, 2000.
. ., . . : , , // : - . 2006.
. . //
- / . . . . -, 2006,.
. . : . . . .
., 1969.
. ., . . . , 2001.
. ., . ., . . //
XXI : / . . . . ., 2003.
. : . //
. ., 2004.
. . // : : -
. , 2006.
. . // IV , ., 2007. . 3.
. .
: . . . . ., 2008.
. . // -2011:
: . ., 2011.
. . //
. ., 2003.
. // . 1998. 3/4.
. . // : . ., 2010.
. .
: . . . . ., 1987.
. . . //
. , 2000.
. . : . . . . ,
2002.
. . : . . .
. --, 2008.

246

. . // XI
:
. , 2010. . 1.
. . //
IV . ., 2007. . 3.
. ? (socioforum.ru).
. //THESIS. 1993.
. 1. . 3.
. // . 1993. 5.
: . . ., 2008.
(vslux.ru).
. . // . 2002. 3.
. . : . . . . .,
1997.
. .
// , , : .
- . . 1. .; : .
, 2004.
. ., . . . .,
2003.
. . :
. . . . --, 2003.
. ., . . //
-2002: - . ., 2002.
. . ., 1990.
. . . // .
2006. 11.
. . //
. / . . . . , 1999.
. : . ., 2004.
. :
// XXI. 2003. 5.
. . // . 2007. 3.
. . : .
. . . , 2008.
X. . (kapital-rus.ru).
.-. // / . . . . .,
2004.
. . - // , ,
: : - .
.; , 2004. . 1.
. // . 1993. 5.
., . . ., 2003.
. . ., 1999.
. . : . . . , 1998.
. . , :
. . . . --, 2006.
. . //
- / . . . . -, 2006.

247

. . // : :
. . , 2005.
. . : . ., 1998.
. . : , , . .,
2000.
. . . ., 1989.
. . . ., 1994.
. . . , 1996.
. // . 2006. 4.
. . - : . . ... .
. ., 2005.
. . : . ., 2010.
. 3.
/ . . . . ., 2004.
. . : . ., 1996.
. : . ., 1996.
. . ., 2000.
. . :
. . ... . . ., 2004.
. . //
: : . ., 2000.
. . :
. . . . --, 2008.
. . : . , 1992.
. . : (hse.ru).
. . . ., 2003.
. . // . 2003. 11.
. . . //
. 2004. 9.
Abramson P. R., Finifter A. W. On the Meaning of Political Trust: New Evidence from Items Introduced in
1978 // American Journal of Political Science, 1981, v. 25. p. 297307.
Alesina A., La Ferrara E. Who Trust Other? // Journal of Public Economics, 2002, v. 85, p. 207234.
Anderhub V. Engelmann D., Gth W. An experimentalstudy ofthe repeated trust game with incomplete information // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2002, v. 48, p. 197216.
Anderson L., Dedrick R. Development of the trust in physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in
patienet physician relationships // Psychology Reports, 1990, v. 67, p. 10911100.
Andrews J. Abuse of trust // Nursing Times, 1992, v. 88, p. 24.
Arce D. Taking corporate culture seriously: group effects in the trust game // Southern Economic Journal,
2006, v. 73, p. 2736.
Arkes H. R. Some practical judgment /decision making research // . : . . . ., 2004.
Arrow K. J. Gifts and exchanges // Philosophy and public affairs, 1972, v. 1, p. 343362.
Asch S. E. Studies of independence and conformity // Psychol. Monogr., 1956, v. 70 (9).
Ashraf N., Bohnet I., Piankov N. Decomposing Trust and Trustworthiness. Harvard, 2006.
Aubert . ., Kelsey B. L. Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams // Small Group
Research, 2003, v. 34 (5), p. 575618.
Bacharach M., Guerra G., Zizzo D. J. The Self-Fulfilling Property of Trust: An Experimental Study // Manuscript University of Oxford, 2003, July.
Baier A. Trust and antitrust // Ethics, 1985, v. 96, p. 231260.
Bailey T. On Trust and Philosophy (open2.net).

248

Bain P. L., Mann L., Pirola-Merlo A. The Innovation Imperative: The Relationships Between Team Climate,
Innovation, and Performance in Research and Development Teams // Small Group Research, 2001, v.
32(1), p. 5573.
Baker J. Trust and rationality // Pacific philosophical quarterly, 1987, v. 68.
Barbalet J. Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macro-sociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Barber B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1983.
Barefoot J. C., Maynard K. E., Beckham J. C., Brummett B. H., Hooker K., Siegler I. C. Trust, health, and longevity // Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1998, v. 21, p. 517526.
Beard M. Trust, life events, and risk factors among adults // Advances in Nursing Science, 1982, v. 4, p.
2643.
Begue L. Belief injustice and faith in people: just world, religiosity and interpersonal trust // Personality and
individual difference, 2002, 32, . 375382.
Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history // Games and Economic Behavior, 1995,
v. 10, p. 122142.
Berkowitz L. Group standards, cohesiveness and productivity // Human Relations, 1954, v. 7, p. 509519.
Beugelsdijk S. A note on the theory and measurement of trust in explaining differences in economic growth //
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2006, v. 30, p. 371387.
Beugelsdijk S., de Grooty H., van Schaikz A. Trust and economic growth: a robustness analysis // Oxford Economic Papers, 2004, v. 56, p. 118134.
Bies R.J., Tripp T. Beyond trust: Getting even and the need for revenge // Trustin Organizations: Frontiers
of theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 246260.
Binet A. La sugestibilite. Paris, 1900.
Bjornskov Ch. Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation // European sociological rev.
Oxford, 2008, v. 4, 3, p. 271283.
Bohnet I., Harmgart H., Huck S., Tyran J.-R. Learning trust // Journal of the European Economic Association,
2005, v. 3, p. 322329.
Bok S. Lying: Moral Choice in Private and Public Life, Pantheon Books, 1978.
Bolle F. Rewarding trust: an experimental study // Theory and Decision, 1998, v. 45(1), p. 8398.
Bolle F., Kaehler J. Meta-Studies May be Misleading the Case of Colemans Hypothesis on Trusting Behavior // Absurdity in the Economy. 30th Annual Congress IAREP, 2005.
Boon S. D., Holmes J. G. The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk / Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior // R. A. Hinde, J. Groebel (eds.). N.-Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991,
p. 167182.
Bownds D. Trust in oxytocin // Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008, 9 (thoughtsonhappiness.com)
Boyle R., Bonacich P. The development of trust and mistrust in mixed motives games // Sociometry, 1970, v.
33, p. 123139.
Brann P., Foddy M. Trust and the consumption of a deteriorating resource // Journal of conflict resolution,
1988, v. 31, p. 615630.
Brewer M. B. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust // Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences /
M. B. Brewer, B. E. Collins (eds.), N.-Y.: Jossey-Bass, 1981, p. 345359.
Brockner J., Seigel P. A. Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice:the role
oftrust // Trustin Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 390413.
Brockner J., Siegel P. A., Daly J. P., Tyler T. When trust matters: the moderating effects of outcome favorability // Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, v. 43, p. 558583.
Bromiley P., Cummings L. L. Transaction costs in organizations with trust // Research on Negotiation in Organizations / R. Bies, R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard (eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1996, v. 5, p. 219247.
Brown P. G. Restoring the Public Trust. Boston: Beacon, 1994.
Bruelhart M., Usunier J.-C. Verified trust: Reciprocity, altruism, and noise in trust games. University of Lausanne, 2004.
Brunie A. Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective and generalized social capital //
Social science research. Amsterdam, 2009, v. 38, 2, p. 251265.

249

Burke P. Trust and commitment through self-verification Social psychology quarterly, 1999, v. 62, 4, p.
347366.
Burks St. V., Carpenter J. P., Verhoogen E. Playing both roles in the trust game // Journal of Economic Behavior
and Organization, 2003, v. 51, p. 195216.
Burt R., Knez M. Kinds of third-party effects on trust // Journal Ration. Soc., 1995, v. 7, p. 255292.
Burt R., Knez M. Third-party gossip and trust // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research /
R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 6869.
Butler J. Toward understanding and measuring conditions oftrust: evolution of a condition of trust inventory //
Journal of Management, 1991, v. 17, p. 643663.
Carnevale D. G. Trustworthy Government: Leadership and Management Strategies for Building Trust and
High Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
Castaldo S. Meanings of Trust: a Meta Analysis of Trust Definitions: Paper presented at Second Euram
Conference. Stockholm, 2002 (sses.se).
Castaldo S. Trust Variety: Conceptual Nature, Dimensions and Typologies (sses.se).
Cesarini D., Dawes Ch. T., Fowler J. H., Johannesson M., Lichtenstein P., Wallace B. Heritability of cooperative
behavior in the trust game // PNAS, 2008, v. 105, 10, p. 37213726.
Chaiken S. Communicator physical attractivenes and persuasion // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
1979, v. 37, p. 13871397.
Chiles T. H., McMackin J. F. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics //
Academy of Management Review, 1996, v. 21, p. 7399.
Churchland P. S. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us Abo ut Morality. Princeton University Press, 2011.
Cialdini R. B. Influence: Science and Practice. Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
Ciriolo E. Trust: deep-rooted community attitude or reciprocity-based behavioural norm // ECARES.
Bruxcelles, 2007.
Citrin J. Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government // American Political Science Review,
1968, v. 68, p. 973988.
Citrin J., Green D. F. Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government // British Journal
of Political Science, 1968, v. 16, p. 431453.
Clark M. C., Payne R. L. The nature and structure of workerstrustin management // Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 1997, v. 18, p. 205224.
Clifford C. Cooperation, trust, and 1 perceived intentions in a 2 person game // Dissertation Abstracts
International, 1971, 32 (5-a), p. 27972798.
Cofta P. Trust, Complexity and Control: Confidence in a Convergent World. Chichester: John Wiley and
Sons Ltd, 2007.
Cook T. D., Flay B. R. The resistence of experimentally induced attitude change // L. Berkowitz (ed.). Advances
in experimental social psychology, v. 11, N.-Y., Academic Press, 1978, p. 256.
Covey S. R., Merrill R. R. The SPEED of Trust: The One Thing that Changes Everything. Free Press, 2006.
Cox J. Trust, reciprocity, and other regarding preferences of individuals and groups. Working paper. University
of Arizona, 1999.
Cox J. C. How to identify trust and reciprocity? // Games and Economic Behaviour, 2004, v. 46 (2), p.
260281.
Creed W. D., Miles R. E. Trust in organizations: a conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial
philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and
research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 1638.
Croson R., Buchan N. Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from a trust game // American
Economic Review, 1999, v. 89, p. 386391.
rutchfield R. S. Conformity and character // Current Perspectives in Social Psychology, 1967, v. 12, 2.
Culnan M. J., Armstrong P. K. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: An
empirical investigation // Organization Science, 1999, v. 10 (1), p. 104115.
Cummings L., Bromiley P. The organizational Trust Inventory: Development and Validation // In: Trust in
Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and research. R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, 1996.

250

Das T. K., Teng B. S. Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances //
Academy of Management Review, 1998, v. 23(2), p. 491513.
Dalbert C., Montada L., Schmitt M. Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier
Skalen (Belief in a just world as motive: Validity correlates of two scales). Psychologische Beitr ge, 1987,
v. 29, . 596615.
Das T. K., Teng B. S. Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: an Integrated Framework // Organization
Studies, 2001, v. 22 (2), p. 251283.
Dasgupta P. Trust as a commodity // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta (ed.).
Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000. Ch. 10, p. 4972.
DeBruine L. M. Trustworthy but Not Lust-Worthy: Context-Specifi c Effects of Facial Resemblance // Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, v. 272, p. 919922.
Deutsch M. Trust and suspicion // Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1958, v. 2, p. 265279.
Deutsch M. Trust, trustworthiness, and the F scale // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, v.
61, p. 138140.
Deutsch M. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion // Human Relations, 1960, v. 13,
p. 123139.
Deutsch M. Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes // Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln:
Nebraska University Press, 1962, p. 275320.
Deutsch M., Gerard H. B. A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment //
Jurnal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, v. 51, p. 629636.
Dion K. K., Stein S. Physical attractivenes and interpersonal influence // Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 1978, v. 14, p. 97109.
Dirks K. T. Trust in Leadership and Team Performance: Evidence From NCAA Basketball //Journal of Applied
Psychology, 2000, v. 12, p. 10041012.
Distrust (Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust, Vol. 8) / R. Hardin (ed.), 2004.
Dumont L. The concept of trust in the Politics of John Locke // Philosophy in history / R. Rorty et al (eds.).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Eagly A. H., Carli L. L. Sex of researcher and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A metaanalysis of social influence studies // Psychological Bulletib, 1981, v. 90, p. 120.
Eagly A. H., Wood W. Gender and influenceability: stereotype versus behavior // V. E. OLeary, R. K. Unger,
B. S. Wallston (eds.). Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, N.-Y., Erlbaum, 1985.
Eagly A. H., Wood W., Chaiken S. Casual inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change //
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, v. 36, p. 424435.
Egelhoff T. Six Ways to Build Customer Trust and Confidence, 2004 (smalltownmarketing.com).
Eisenhardt K. Agency theory: An assessment and review // Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14 (1),
p. 5774.
Eisenstadt S. N. Power, trust, and meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Endrefi M. Vertrauen. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2002.
Endress M. Foundation of Trust. Introductory Remarks on the Sociology of Trust // Schrader H. (ed.) Trust
and Social Transformation. Theoretical approaches and empirical findings from Russia, Miinster, Lit
Verlag, 2004.
Entrepreneurial Strategies and Trust. Structure and Evolution of Entrepreneurial Behavioral Patterns in
Low Trust and High Trust Environments of East and West Europe. Part 4: Estonia and Russia /
H.-H. Hohmann, Fr. Welter (eds.) // Arbeitspapiere und Materialien Forschungstelle Osteuropa
(Bremen), 2004, 57.
Erber R., Lau R. R. Political Reconciliation of Policy-Based and Incumbency-Based Interpretations of Changes
in Trust in Government // American Journal of Political Science, 1990, v. 34, p. 236253.
Erickson B., Lind E. A., Johnson B. C., OBarr W. M. Speech style and impression formation in a court setting:
The effects of powerful and powerless speech // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, v. 14,
p. 266279.
Fagot B. I.The socialization of sex differences in early chilfhood. N.-Y., 1978.
Farrell H., Knight J. Trust, institutions and institutional changes: industrial districts and social capital hypothesis
Politics Society, 2003, vol. 31, 4, p. 537566.

251

Fine G., Holyfield L. Secrecy, trust and dangerous leisure: generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations // Social Psychology Quarterly, 1996, v. 59, p. 2238.
Fox A. Beyond Contract: Power and Trust Relations. London: Faber and Faber, 1974.
Franklin K. M., Janoff-Bulman R., Roberts J. E. Long-Term Impact of Parental Divorce on Optimism and Trust:
Changes in General Assumptions or Narrow Beliefs? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
1990, v. 59 (4), p. 743755.
Fukuyama F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. N.-Y.: The free press, 1995.
Gabarro J. J. The development of trust and expectations // Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and
Understanding in Relationships / A. G. Athos, J. J. Gabarro (eds.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall,
1978, p. 290303.
Gabarro J. J. The development of working relationships // Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological
foundations of cooperative work / J. Gallagher, R. E. Kraut, C. Egido (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, 1990, p. 79110.
Gambetta D. Can we trust in trust? // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta
(ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, p. 213237.
Gambetta D. Mafia: the price of distrust // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta
(ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, p. 158175.
Gambetta D. Mafia: The Price of Distrust Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. University of
Oxford, 2000. Ch. 10, p. 158175.
Garfinkel H. H. A conception of, and experiments with trust as a condition of stable concerted actions // Motivation and social interaction: Cognitive determinants / O. J. Harvey (ed.). N.-Y.: Ronald Press, 1973.
Gellner E. Trust, cohesion, and the social order // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D.
Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
Gerard H. B., Wilhelmy R. A., Conolley E. S. Conformity and group size // Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1968, v. 8, p. 7982.
Gibson D. What makes clients trust nurses? // SCI Nursing, 1990, v. 7, p. 8185.
Giddens A. The consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity. Stanford (Col.) Stanford univ. press, 1991.
Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Giffn K. The contribution of studies of course credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process // Psychological Bulletin, 1967, v. 68, p. 104120.
Giordano B. To be effective health care providers and patient advocates, we must keep the publics trust //
AORN Journal, 1997, v. 65, p. 14.
Glaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman J., Souttter . Measuring trust // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000,
v. 115, August, p. 811846.
Good D. Individuals, interpersonalrelations, and trust // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations /
D. Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, p. 3148.
Goold S.D. Money and trust: relationships between patients, physicians, and health plans // Journal of Health
Politics, Policy and Law, 1998, v. 23, p. 687695.
Govier T. An epistemology of trust // International journal of moral and social studies, 1993, v. 8 (2),
p. 155174.
Govier T. Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust, and the construction of social reality // Dialogue, 1994,
v. 33, p. 237252.
Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness // American Journal
of Sociology, 1985, v. 91, p. 481510.
Gratton M. C. A theoretical empirical study of the lived experience of interpersonal trust // Dissertation
Abstracts International, 1975, v. 36 (45), p. 1918.
Gray B. H. Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era // Health Affairs, 1997, v. 16, p. 3449.
Grovier T. An epistemology of trust // International journal of moral and social studies, 1994, v. 8, p. 155
174.
Guerra G., Zizzo D. J. Trust Responsiveness and Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University, 2002.
Guha-Khasnobis B., Kanbur R., Ostrom E. (eds.) Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and
Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

252

Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust & The implications of repeated ties on contractual choice in alliances //
Academy of management journal, 1995, v. 38(1), p. 85112.
Gurtman M. B. Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: a circumflex analysis // Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 1992, v. 62, p. 9891002.
Gth W., Oskenfels P., Wendel M. Cooperation based on trust: an experimental investigation // Journal of
Economic Psychology, 1997, v. 18 (1), p. 1543.
Gth W., Kliemt H., Bezalel P. Coevolution of preferences and information in simple games of trust. Discussion
Paper 123. Economic Series. Humboldt Universitt zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultet,
1998.
Hamsher J. H., Geller J. D., Rotter J. B. Interpersonaltrust, internal-external control and the Warren Commission Report // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, v. 9, p. 210215.
Hardin R. Trusting persons, trusting institutions // Strategy and Choice / R. J. Zeckahuser (ed.). Cambridge,
MA: MIT, 1991.
Hardin R. The street level epistemology of trust // Anal. Krit., 1992, v. 14, p. 152176.
Hardin R. Trust. N.-Y.: Russell Sage, 1998.
Hart C. W., Johnson M. D. A Framework for Developing Trust Relationships.// Marketing Management,
1999, v. 8 (1), p. 2022.
Hart K. Kinship, contract, and trust: The economic organization of migrants in an African city slum //Trust:
Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
Hartup W. W. Peer interaction and social organization // P. H. Mussen (ed.). Carmishaels manual of child
psycholoogy. N.-Y., Wiley, v.2, 1970.
Hayashi N., Ostrom E., Walker J., Yamagishi T. Reciprocity, Trust and the Sense of Control //Rationality and
Society, 1999, v. 11, p. 2746.
Hazan C., Shafer P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process // Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 1987, v. 52, p. 511524.
Hemsley G. D., Doob A. N. The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicators credibility //
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978, v. 8, p. 136144.
Heimer C. Solving the problem of trust. Trust in society edt. By Karen S. Cook. N.-Y.: Rssel Sage, 2001,
p. 4088.
Hetherington M. The Political Relevance of Political Trust // American Science Review, 1998, v. 92 (4), p.
791808.
Hill C. L. Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory // Academy of Management Review, 1990, v. 15, p. 500514.
Hochreich D. J., Rotter J. Have college students become less trusting? // Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1970, v. 15, p. 211214.
Hoffinan A. A conceptualization of trust in international relations // European journal of international relation, 2002, vol. 8 (3), p. 375401.
Holmes J. G., Rempel J. K. Trust in close relationships // Close relationships / C. Hendrick (ed.). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage, 1989, p. 187220.
Holmes K. Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships // W. H. Jones, D. Perlman (eds.). Advances
in personal relationships. London: Jessika Kingsley Publishers, 1991, p. 57104.
Hoppe O. Vertrauen // Liebe und Freundschaft in der Sozialp dagogik: Personale Dimension professionellen
Handels / Hrsg. von C. Meyer, H. Tetzer, K. Rensch. B.: VS, 2009, s. 135158.
Hosmer L. T. Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics // Academy
of Management Review, 1995, v. 20 (2), p. 379403.
Hovland C. I., Janis I. L. Personality and persuasibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1959.
Hurdin R. Trust and trustworthiness. Russel Sage Foundation Series on Trust, vol. IV, N.-Y.: Russel Sage
Foundation, 2002.
Insko C. A., Schopler J. Differential distrust of groups and individuals // Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup
Behavior / . Sedikides, J. Schopler, C. Insko (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997.
Jalava J. From Norms to Trust // European Journal of Social Theory, 2003, v. 6 (2), p. 173190.
Janis I. L., Field P. B. A behavioral assessment of persuasibility: Consistency of individual differences. Sociometry, 1956, v. 19, p. 241259.

253

Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams // Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, 1998, v. 3, p. 791815.
Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams //
Journal of Management Information Systems, 1998, v. 14, p. 2965.
Jones G. R., George J. M. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork //
Academy of Management Review, 1998, v. 23, p. 531546.
Jones G., George J. The Evolution of Trust and Cooperation: Implications for Teamwork and Tacit Knowledge
(wehner.tamu.edu).
Johns J. A concept analysis of trust // Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1996, v. 24, p. 7683.
Johns J. Trust: key to acculturation in corporatized health care environments // Nursing Administration
Quarterly, 1996, v. 20, p. 1324.
Johnson-George C., Swap W.C. Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of
a scale to assess trust in a specific other // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, v. 43,
p. 13061317.
Kao A. C., Green D. C., Davis N. A., Koplan J. P., Cleary P. D. Patients trust in their physicians: effects of choice,
continuity, and payment method // Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998, v. 13, p. 681686.
Kao A. C., Green D. C., Zaslavsky A. M., Koplan J. P., Cleary P. D. The relationship between method of physician
payment and patient trust // Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998, v. 280, p. 17081714.
Katzenstein G. What generates trust in organizations: A social network answer. Graduate School of Industrial
Administration. Carnegie Mellon University. Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
Kegan D. L., Rubenstein A. Measures of trust and openness // Comparative Studies, 1972, 3, p. 179201.
Kipnis D. Trust and technology // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer,
T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 3950.
Klein D. B. Trust for Hire: Voluntary Remedies for Quality and Safety // Reputation: studies in the voluntary elicitation of good conduct / D. B. Klein (ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997,
p. 97135.
Knack S., Zak P. J. Building trust: Public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development // Supreme
Court economic rev. Chicago, 2002, v. 10, 1, p. 91107.
Knights D., Noble F., Vurdubakis ., Willmott T. Chasing shadows: Control, virtuality and the production of
trust // Organization Studies, 2001, v. 22 (2), p. 311336.
Koehn D. Should we trustin trust // American Business Law Journal, 1996, v. 34, p. 183203.
Kollock P. The emergence of exchange structures: an experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and
trust // American Journal of Sociology, 1994, v. 100, p. 313345.
Kosfield M., Heinfichs M., Zak P. J., Fischbacher U., Fehr E. Oxytocin Increases Trust in Humans, Nature, 2003,
v. 435, p. 673676.
Kramer R. M. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions // Annual
Reviews Psychology, 1999, v. 50 (4), p. 569598.
Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B., Hanna B. Collective trust and collective action in organizations: the decision
to trust as a social decision // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer,
T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 357389.
Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
1996.
Kruglanski A. W. Attributing trust worthinessin supervisor worker relations // J. Exp. Soc. Psychol, 1970,
v. 6, p. 214232.
Lahno B. Trust, reputation, and exit in exchange relationships. // Journal of conflict resolution, 1995, v. 39
(3), p. 495510.
Landa J. T. Trust, ethnicity, and identity: Beyond the new institutional economics of ethnic trading, networks,
contract law, and gift exchange. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
Landmark papers on trust / A. Zaheer, R. Bachmann (eds.). Edward Elgar, 2008.
La Porta R., Lopez de Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Trust in large organizations // American Economic
Review, 1997, v. 87 (2), p. 333338.
Laraque D., Mitchell J. A matter of trust: mandatory HIV testing (letter to the editor) // Archives of Pediatrics
and Adolescent Medicine, 1996, v. 150, p. 556557.

254

Levi M. A State of Trust // Trust and Governance / V. Braithwaite, M. Levi (eds.). N.-Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998, p. 77101 (colbud.hu).
Levis D., Weigert A. J. Trust as social reality // Social forces, 1985, v. 63 (4), p. 967985.
Levis D., Weigert A. J. Social atomism, holism, and trust // The sociological quarterly, 1985, v. 26 (4),
p. 455471.
Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships // Trust in organizations:
Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996,
p. 114139.
Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B. Trust in relationships: a model of trust development and decline // Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essay inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch / B. B. Bunker, J. Z. Rubin, associates
(eds.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995, p. 133174.
Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities // Academy of
Management Review, 1998, v. 23 (3), p. 438459.
Lewicky R. J., Stevenson M., Bunker B. B. The three components of interpersonal trust: instrument development
and differences across relationships // The Ohio State University: WPS. Feb., 1997.
Lewicki R. J., Tomlinson E. C., Gillespie N. Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches,
Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions // Journal of Management, 2006, v. 10, p. 9921022.
Lewis J. D., Weigert A. Trust as a social reality // Social Forces, 1985, v. 63 (4), p. 967985.
Luhmann N. Familiarity, confidence, and trust: problems and alternatives // Trust: Making and Breaking
Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988, p. 94107.
Luhmann N. Trust and power. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1979.
Luhmann N. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexit t. Stuttgart: Enke, 1989.
Luhmann N. Vertrautheit, Zuversicht, Vertrauen: Probleme und Alternativen // Vertrauen: Die Grundlage
des sozialen Zusammenhalts / Hrsg. von M. Hartmann, C. Offe. Frankfurt . M.; N.-Y.: Campus, 2001,
s. 143160.
Lundstedt S. Interpersonal Risk Theory // Journal of Psychology, 1966, v. 62.
Malhotra D. Trust and Reciprocity Decisions: The Differing Perspectives of Trustors and Trusted Parties //
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004, v. 94, p. 6173.
Mancini P. Between trust and suspicion: How political journalists solve the dilemma // European Journal of
Communication, 1993, v. 8, p. 3351.
Mashler W., Rose R. What are the origins of political trust? // Comparative political studies, 2001, v. 34,
1, p. 3062.
Mayer R. C., Davis J. H. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasiexperiment // Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, v. 84, p. 123136.
Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F .D. An integrative model of organizational trust // Academy of Management
Review, 1995, v. 20, p. 709734.
McAlister D. J. Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations //
Academy of Management Journal, 1995, v. 38, p. 2459.
McAllister D. J. Two faces of interpersonal trust // Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 6 / R. J.
Lewicki, R. J. Bies, B. H. Sheppard (eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997, p. 87112.
McCabe K. A., Rigdon M. L., Smith V. L. Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games // Journal of Economic
Behavior and Organization, 2003, v. 52, p. 267275.
McGregor D. The Professional Manager. N.-Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1967, p. 163.
McGuiere W. J. Attitudes and attitude change // G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (eds.). Handbook of social psychology,
v. 2. N-Y., Random House, 1985, p. 233346.
McHoskey J., Worzel W., Szyarto C. Machiavellialism and psychopathy // Journal of Pers. and Soc. Psycholoogy,
1998, v. 74(1), p. 192210.
McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships //
Academy of Management Review, 1998, v. 23, Is. 3, p. 473490.
Mechanic D. Managed care, rationing, and trust in medical care // Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the
New York Academy of Medicine, 1998, v. 75, p. 118122.
Mechanic D. Public trust and initiatives for new health care partnerships // Milbank Quarterly, 1998, v. 76,
p. 281302.

255

Mechanic D., Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients trust in medical care and their physicians //
Journal of the American Medical Association, 1996, v. 275, p. 16931697.
Meents S., Tan Y., Verhagen T. Distinguishing Different Types of Trust (swissdigin.ch).
Meize-Grochowski R. An analysis of the concept of trust // Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1984, v. 9, p. 563
572.
Mellinger G. D. Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
1956, v. 51, p. 304309.
Messik D., Kramer R. M. Trust a form of shallow morality // Trust in Society / S. Cook (ed.). Russell Sage
Foundation, 2001, p. 89117.
Meyerson D., Weick K., Kramer R. M. Swift trust and temporary groups // Trustin Organizations: Frontiers of
theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 66195.
Milgram S., Bickman L., Berkowitz L. Note on the drawing power of crowds of different zise // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, v. 13, p. 7982.
Miller N., Maruyama G., Beaber R. J., Valone K. Speed of speech and persuasion // Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 1976, v. 34, p. 615624.
Milligan K., Moretti E., Oreopoulos P. Does Education Improve Citizenship? Evidence from the United States
and United Kingdom // Journal of Public Economics, 2004, v. 88, p. 16671695.
Milne G., Boza M. Trust and concern in consumers perceptions of marketing information management practices // Journal of Interactive Marketing, 1999, v. 13 (1), p. 524.
Mishler W., Rose R. What are the Origins of Political Trust?: Testing Institutional and Cultural Theorires in
Post Communist Societies // Comparative Political Studies, 2001, v. 34(1), p. 3062.
Mishler W., Rose R. Trust, Distrust and Scepticism: Popular Evalutions of Civil and Political Institutions in
Post-Communist Societies // Journal of Politics, 1997, v. 59, p. 418451.
Mishra N. Organizational responsesto crisis: the centrality oftrust // Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory
and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 261287.
Misztal B. A. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996.
Mitchell . . Violation the public trust: The ethical and moral obligations of government official // Public
Personnel Management, 1999, v. 28 (1), p. 2738.
Mollering G. The Nature of trust: from Georg Simmrl to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension/
Sociology, 2001, v. 35 (2), p. 403420.
Moreland R. L., Levine J. M. Socialization and Trust in Work Groups Group // Processes and Intergroup
Relations, 2002, v. 5 (3), p. 185201.
Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing // Journal of Marketing,
1994, v. 58, Is. 3, p. 2039.
Morris W. N., Miller R. S. The effects of consensus-breaking and consensus-preempting partners on reduction
of conformity // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, v. 11, p. 215223.
Musham . Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? // Environment and behavior,
2000,v. 32, 3 (May), p. 410426.
Newcomer L. N. Measure of trust in health care // Health Affairs, 1997, v. 16, p. 5056.
Newton K. Social and Political Trust in Established Democracies // Critical Citizens: Global Support for
Democratic Governance / Pippa Norris (ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 169187.
Nie N. H., Junn J., Stehlik-Barry K. Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University
Chicago Press, 1996.
Norman G. J., Cacioppo J. T., Morris J. S., Karelina T., Malarkey W. B., DeVries A., Berntson G. G. Selective
influences of oxytocin on the evaluative processing of social stimuli // Journal of Psychopharmacology,
2011; v. 25, (10), p. 13131319.
Northouse P. Interpersonal trust and empathy in nurse-nurse relationships // Nursing Research, 1979, v. 28,
p. 365368.
Nteberg A., Christianse E., Wallage P. Consumer Trust in Electronic Channels // The Service Journal, 2003,
v. 2, Is. 2, p. 4668.
Noteboom B. Trust: forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
Nurmi R. Conformity with group in a serial judgment situation. Turku, 1970.

256

Nye J. S., Zelikow P. D., King D. C. Why People Dont Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ.
Press, 1997.
Olivero N., Lunt P. Privacy versus willingnessto disclose in commerce exchanges: The effect ofrisk awareness on
the relative role oftrust and control // Journal of Economic Psychology, 2004, v. 25, Is. 2, p. 243262.
Orbell J., Dawes R., Schwartz-Shea P. Trust, social categories, and individuals: the case of gender // Motivation
and Emotion, 1994, v. 18, p. 109128.
Ortman, A., Fitzgerald J., Boeing C. Trust, reciprocity, and social history: A reexamination // Experimental
Economics, 2000, v. 3, p. 81.
Ortman A., Fitzgerald J., Boeing . Trust, reciprocity, and social history: A reexamination // Experimental
Economics, 2000, v. 3, p. 81100.
Osman L. M. Conformity or compliance: The study of sex differences in passers-by behaviour // Brit. J. of Soc.
Psychol., 1982, 1, . 1921.
Pagden A.The destruction of trust and its economic consequencesin the case of eighteenth-century Naples //
Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / D. Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell,
1988.
Paldam M. Generalized trust. The macro perspective. 2007 (mit.econ.au).
Pallak S.M., Murroni E., Koch J. Communicator attractiveness and expertise, emotional versus rational appeals
and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation // Social Cognition, 1983, v. 2,
p. 122141.
Parks C. D., Henager R. F., Scamahorn S. D. Trust and reactions to messages of intent in social dilemmas //
Journal of conflict resolution, 1996, v. 40, p. 134151.
Parks C. D., Hulbert L. G. High and low trustersresponsesto fearin a payoff matrix // Journal of conflict resolution, 1995, v. 39, p. 718730.
Pask E. Trust: an essential component of nursing practice implications for nurse education // Nurse Education Today, 1995, v. 15, p. 190195.
Peter N. What Have We Learned about Generalized Trust. If Anything? (arjournals.annualreviews.org).
Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., Goldman R. Personal involment as a determinant of argument-based persuasion //
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, v. 41, p. 847855.
PEW Research Center for the People and the Press. Trust and Citizen Engagementin Metropolitan Philadelphia: A Case Study.Washington, DC: PEW. 1996.
PEW Research Center for the People and the Press. Deconstructing Distrust: How Americans View Government. Washington, DC: PEW. 1998.
Pilisuk M., Skolnick P. Inducing trust: A test of the Osgood Proposal // Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1968, v. 8, p. 121133.
Political mistrust and the discrediting of politicians / Dogan M. (ed.). Boston: Brill, 2005.
Pratkanis A. R., Greenwald A. G., Leippe M. R., Baumgardner M. H. In search of reliable persuassion effects:
III. The sleeper effectis dead. Long live the sleeper effect // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
1988, v. 54, p. 203218.
Raiser M. Trust in Transition: Paper presented at workshop on trust and honesty / Collegium, Budapest,
2223 November, 2002 (colbud.hu).
Reina D. S., Reina M. L. The truth about trust and betrayal. Associations now, 2006. April.
Reina D. S., Reina M. L. Building Sustainable trust. OD Practitioner. 2007, vol. 9, 1.
Rempel J., Holmes J., Zanna M. Trust in close relationships // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
1985, v. 49, p. 95112.
Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G. How do I trustthee? // Psychology Today, 1986, February, p. 2834.
Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G., Zanna M. P. Trustin close relationships // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, v. 49, Is. 1, p. 95112.
Rheault M. Many World Citizens Trust Neighbors More Than Police: Trust in Neighbors and Police About
Equal in 21 Countries, Gallup, 5 Oct 2007.
Repper J., Ford R., Cooke A. How can nurses build trusting relationships with people who have severe and long
term mental health problems? Experiences of case managers and their clients // Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 1994, v. 19, p. 10961104.
Richardson B. K. Seven ways to win your patients trust // Nursing, 1987, v. 17, p. 4445.

257

Riegelsberger J., Sasse M. A., McCarthy J. D. The Mechanics of Trust: A Framework for Research and Design //
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2005, v. 62, p. 381422.
Robinson S. L. Trust and breach ofthe psychological contract // Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,
v. 41, p. 574599.
Roniger L., Eisenstadt S. Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in
Society. Cambridge, 1984.
Rose-Ackerman S. Trust, Honesty, and Corruption: Reflection on the State- Building Process // European
Journal of Sociology, 2001, v. 42, p. 2771 ( papers.ssrn.com).
Rosenberg L. A. Group size, prior experience and conformity // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
1961, v. 63, p. 436437.
Rosenberg M. Measures of personality and Social Psychological Attitudes / I. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver,
L. Wrightman (eds.). San Diego, N.-Y., Boston: Academic Press, 1991.
Ross W., LaCroix J. Multiple meanings of trust in negotiation theory and research: A literature review and
integrative model // International Journal of Conflict Management, 1996, v. 7, p. 314360.
Rotenberg K. Loneliness and interpersonal trust // Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1994, v. 13,
p. 152173.
Rotter J.B. A new scale forthe measurement of interpersonal trust // Journal of Personality, 1967, v. 35,
p. 651665.
Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for interpersonaltrust // American Psychologist, 1971, v. 26, p. 443
452.
Rotter J. B. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility // American Psychologist, 1980, v. 35,
p. 17.
Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., Camerer C. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust //
Academy of Management Review, 1998, v. 23, Is. 3, p. 393404.
Rubin Z. Living and loving: an invitation to social psychology. N.-Y.: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1973.
Ruditis S. E. Developing trustin nursing interpersonal relationships // Journal of Psychiatric Nursing and
Mental Health, 1979, v. 17, p. 2023.
Sabel C. F. Studied trust: building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy // Human Relations, 1993,
v. 46, p. 11331170.
Sakurai M. M. Small group cohesiveness and detrimental conformity // Sociometry, 1975, v, 38, p. 340357.
Sato K. Trust and group size in a social dilemma // Jpn. Psychol. Res., 1988, v. 30, p. 8893.
Saxe L. Lying: Thoughts of an applied psychologist // American Psyxhologist, 1991, v. 46 (4), p. 409415.
Schill T., Toves C., Ramariaiah N. Interpersonal trust and coping with stress // Psychological Reports, 1980,
v. 47, p. 1192.
Schindler P. L., Thomas C. C. The structure of Interpersonal Trust in the Workplace //Psychological Reports,
1993, v. 10, p. 563573.
Schutte J. G.The effects of power and trust on self-disclosure in social interaction // Dissertation Abstracts
International, 1974, v. 35 (56), p. 2484.
Seligman A. B. The Problem of Trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1997.
Shah D. V. Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social
capital // Hoboken (NJ), 1998, v. 19 (3), p. 469496.
Shapiro S. Policing trust // Private Policing / C. D. Shearing, P. C. Stenning (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 1987.
Shapiro S. P. The social control of impersonal trust // American Journal of Sociology, 1987, v. 93, p. 623
658.
Shapiro D. L., Sheppard B. H., Cheraskm L. Business on a handshake // Negotiations Journal, 1992, v. 8,
p. 365377.
Shaw R. B. Trust in the Balance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
Shockley-Zalabak P., Ellis K., Winograd G. Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters // Organization
Development Journal, 2000, v.18, p. 3548.
Siegler I. C. Trust, health, and longevity // Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1998, v. 21, p. 517526.

258

Sitkin S. B. On the positive effects of legalization on trust // Research on negotiation in organizations, 1995,
v. 5, p. 185217.
Sitkin S. B., Roth N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust //
Organization Science, 1993, v. 4, p. 367392.
Sitkin S. B., Stickel D. The road to hell: the dynamics of distrust in an era of quality // Trust in Organizations:
Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p.
196215.
Sleeper S., Wholey D., Hamer R., Schwartz S., Inoferio V. Trust me: technical and institutional determinants of
health maintenance organizations shifting risk to physicians // Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
1998, v. 39, p. 189200.
Slemrod J., Katuscak P. Do Trust and Trustworthiness Pay Off? // Manuscript University of Michigan. May,
2002.
Schneier B. Liars and outliers. Enabling the trust that society needs to thrive. Indianapolis, Ind., Wiley,
2012.
Shapiro S. P. The Social Control of Impersonal Trust //American Journal of Sociology, 1987, v. 93, p. 623
58.
Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy // Risk Anal., 1993, v. 13, p. 675682.
Sobel R. Deception/trust, Israel // Journal of Medical Sciences, 1996, v. 32, p. 256259.
Smith S. M., Schaffer D. R. Celerity and cajolery: Rapid speech may promote or inhibit persuasion through its
impacton message elaboration // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, v. 17, p. 663669.
Solomon L. The influence of some types of power relationships and game strategies upon the development of
interpersonal trust // Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, vol. 61, p. 223230.
Solow R. But verify // Review of Fukuyama. New Republic, 1995, v. 11, p. 36.
Sorrentino R. M., Holmes J. G., Hanna S. E., Sharp A. Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships:
individual differences in cognitive styles // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, v. 68,
p. 314327.
Special topic forum on trust in and between organizations // Academy of Management Review, 1998, v. 23,
Is. 3, p. 387620.
Stack L. C. Trust // Dimensionality of personality / H. London, J. E. Exner Jr. (eds.). N.-Y.: Wiley, 1988,
p. 561599.
Stone W. Measuring Social Capital [Research Paper] // Australian Institute of family studies, 2001, 24
(aifs.gov.au).
Strickland L. H. Surveillance and trust // Journal of Personality, 1958, v. 26, p. 200215.
Sullivan J. L., Transue J. E. The psychological underpinnings of democracy: a selective review of research on
political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital // Annual Review of Psychology, 1999, v. 50,
p. 625650.
Swap W. C. Measurement of Specific Interpersonal Trust: Construction and Validation of a Scale to Assess
Trust in a Specific Other // Journal of Personality and Sosial Psychology, 1982, v. 43 (6).
Swinth R. L. The establishment of the trust relation // Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1967, 11, . 335
344.
Sydow J. V. Understanding the constitution of interogranizational trust // C. Laneand, R. Bachmann (eds.).
Trust Within and Between Organizations. Oxford, 1998, . 3163.
Sztompka P. Mistrusting Civility: Predicament of a Post-Communist Society // Real Civil Societies / J. Alexander (ed.). London: Sage, 1997.
Sztompka P. Trast, distrast and the paradox of Democracy / Prepared for presentation at the XVIth World
Congress of the IPSA, Korea, Seoul. 1721 august 1997.
Sztompka P. Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy // The European Journal of Social Theory, 1998,
v. 1, Is. 1, p. 412.
Sztompka P. Trust: a sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1999.
Tan F. B. Online Consumer Trust: A Multi-Dimensional Model // Journal of Electronic Commerce in
Organizations, 2004, v. 2, Is. 3, p. 4059.
Tardy C. H. Interpersonal evaluations: Measuring attraction and trust // A handbook for the study of human
communication /C. H. Tardy (ed.). Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publishing, 1988, p. 269283.

259

The Trust Crisis in Healthcare / D. A. Shore (ed.). Oxford University Press, 2006.
Thom D., Campbell B. Patient physician trust: an exploratory study // Journal of Family Practice, 1997, v. 44,
p. 169176.
Thom D. H., Ribisl K. M., Stewart A. L., Luke D. A. Further validation and reliability testing of the trust in
physician scale // Medical Care, 1999, v. 37, p. 510517.
Thorn D. H., Bloch D. A., Segal E. S. An intervention to increase patients trust in their physicians // Academic
Medicine, 1999 (Feb.), v. 74 (2), p. 195198.
Thorn D., Campbell B. Patient physician trust: an exploratory study // Journal of Family Practice, 1997, v. 44,
p. 169176.
Thorne S., Robinson C. Reciprocal trust in health care relationships // Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1988,
v. 13, p. 782789.
Thomas D. O. The duty to trust // The Aristotelian society, 1978, v. 79, p. 89101.
Trettin L., Musham C. Is trust a realistic goal of environmental risk communication? // Environment and
behavior, 2000, v. 32 (3), p. 410426.
Trojan L., Yonge O. Developing trusting, caring relationships: home carenurses and elderly clients // Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 1993, v. 18, p. 903910.
Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches // The Russell Sage Foundation Series on
Trust, vol. 7 / R. M. Kramer, K. S. Cook (eds.). 2004.
Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural Perspectives // Advances in Cultural Psychology Constructing Human
Development) / I. Markova, F. Gillespie (eds.). Information Age Pub. Inc., 2007.
Trust Barometer 2008 (gtmarket.ru).
Trust Barometer 2009 (gtmarket.ru).
Trust Barometer 2010 (gtmarket.ru)
Trust in Organizations: Frontiers oftheory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage, 1996.
Trust in society / K.S . Cook (ed.). N.-Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001.
Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations / D. Gambetta (ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
Tullock G. The Prisoners Dilemma and Mutual Trust //Ethics, 1967, v. 77, p. 22930.
Tyler T. R., Degoey P. Trustin organizational authorities:the influence of motive attributions on willingnessto
accept decisions //Trustin Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler
(eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 331357.
Tyler T. R., Kramer R. M. Whithertrust? // Trustin Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research / R. M.
Kramer, T. R. Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 115.
Ullmann-Margalit E. Trust, Distrust, and in Between (law.nyu.edu).
Ullmann-Margalit E. Trust Out of Distrust // Journal of Philosophy, 2002, 99 (10), p. 532548.
Uslaner E. Social capital, television, and the mean world: Trust, optimism, and civic participation // Political
psychology. Hoboken (NJ), 1998, v. 19 (3), p. 441467.
Uslaner E. The Moral Foundation of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2002.
Uslaner E. Trust in the knowledge society (esri.go.jp).
Uslaner E. M. Trust and Social Bonds: Faith in Others and Policy Outcomes Reconsidered // Political Research
Quarterly, 2004, v. 57, p.501507.
Uslaner E. M. Trust, Diversity, and Segregation in the United States and the United Kingdom // Comparative
Sociology, 2011, v. 10, p. 22147.
Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness // Administrative
Science Quarterly, 1997, v. 42, p. 3567.
Van Knippenberg, Wilke H. Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms // European Journal
of social Psychology, 1992, v. 22, p. 141155.
Volken T. Elements of trust // Electronic journal of sociology, 2002, vol. 6 (sociology.org).
Voronov V., Romashkin G. Institutional and interpersonal trust as an indicator of the health of modern society //
Ekonomia i Zarzadzanie (Economy and Management). T. III (1). Poland: Bialystok, 2011, p. 712.
Walker J., Brooksby A., McInerny J., Taylor A. Patient perceptions of hospital care: building condence, faith and
trust // Journal of Nursing Management, 1998, v. 6, p. 193200.

260

Wallston K., Wallston B., Gore S. Development of a scale to measure nurses trust of patients // Nursing Research,
1973, v. 22, p. 232233.
Washington G. T. Trust: a critical element in critical care nursing // Focus on Critical Care, 1990, v. 17,
p. 418421.
Watson D., Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood // Psychological Bulletin, 1985, v. 98,
p. 219235.
Webb G. Trust and crises // Trustin Organizations: Frontiers oftheory and research / R. M. Kramer, T. R.
Tyler (eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, p. 288302.
West M. A. The social psychology of innovation in groups // M. A.West, J. L.Farr (eds.). Innovation and creativity
at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1990, p. 309333.
Wheeless L., Grotz J. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure // Communication
Research, 1977, v. 3, p. 250257.
Whitney J. The Trust Factor. N.-Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
Wilder D. A. Perception of groups, size of opposition and social influence // Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 1977, v. 13, p. 253268.
Wilder D. A. Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and out-groups: Organization of
information and attribution of independence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990,
v. 59, p. 12021213.
Williams R. Curing Type A: the trusting heart // Psychology Today, 1989, January / February, p. 3642.
Williamson O. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization // Journal of Law and Economics, 1993,
v. 34, p. 453502.
Willig C. The limitations of trust in intimate relationships: constructions of trust and sexual risk taking //
British Journal of Social Psychology, 1997, v. 36, p. 211221.
Willinger M., Keser C., Lohmann C., Usunier J.-C. A comparison of trust and reciprocity between France and
Germany: Experimental investigation based on the investment game // Journal of Economic Psychology,
2003, v. 24, p. 447466.
Wood W., Eagly A. H. Stages in the analysis of persuasive messages: The role of causal attributions and message
comprehension // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, v. 40, p. 246259.
Worchel P. Trust and distrust // The social psychology of intergroup relations / W. G. Austin, S. Worchel
(eds). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, 1979.
World database of trust (dass.missouri.edu).
Wrightsman L. S. Interpersonal trust and attitudes toward human nature// Measures of Personality and
Psychological Attitudes / J. Robinson, P. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (eds.). San Diego, CA: Academic, 1991,
p. 373412.
Yamagishi T. Trust and Social Intelligence: The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society. Tokyo: Tokyo
University Press, 1998.
Yamagishi . Trust / Encyclopedia of Social Theory, vol. I / G. Ritzer (ed.). Thousand Oaks etc.: Sage, 2005,
p. 847848.
Yamagishi T., Cook K., Watable M. Uncertainty, trust and committment formation in the US and Japan //
American Journal of Sociology, 1998, v. 104, 1, p. 165194.
Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. Trust and commitmentin the United States and Japan // Motivation and Emotion,
1994, v. 18 (2), p. 129166.
Yoshino R. A time to trust: a study on peoples sense of trust // Behaviormetrika, 2002, v. 29 (2), p. 231260.
Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter: exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance // Organization science. 1998, v. 9, 2, p. 141159.
Zak P.J., Knack S. Trust and Growth // The Economic Journal, 2001, 111, p. 295331.
Zak P. J., Kurzban R., Matzner W. T. Oxytocin is Associated with Interpersonal Trust in Humans //PLoS ONE,
2003, v. 2, p.1128.
Zand D. E. Trust and managerial problem solving // Administrative Science Quaterly, 1972, 17, . 229
239.
Zand D. E. The Leadership Triad: Knowledge, Trust, and Power. N.-Y.: Oxford Univ. Press. 1997.
Zimbardo P. G. Shyness: What is it, what to do about it. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.

261

Zimmer T. The impact of Watergate on the publics trust in people and confidence in the mass media // Social
Science Quarterly, 1972, v. 59, p. 743751.
Zucker L. G. The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 18401920 // Research in
organizational behavior, vol. 8 / B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummings (eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986,
p. 53111.


.
: .
. + .
1. , .
2. , , .
3. , .
4. .
5. , .
6. .
7. , .
8. , ,
.
9. , .
10. ,
.
: . 18
. 9 10 1 . : 4 , 46 , 7
.

/
( L).
1. ,
.

2. , ,
, .

3. , ,
.

263

4. , .

5. , .

6. , , ,
.

: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 ,
4 , 5 , 6 .
612 , , 05 .


. . . . .
: . ,
-, +, .
1. , .
2. .
3. , , , .
4. .
5. .
6. , , - .
7. .
8. , .
9. .
10. .
: (+)
. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 () . 2, 5, 10.
: 04 ; 57 ; 810 .

264


. .: .
: .
, . .
1. , ?

2. , , , ?

3. , , ,
?

4. , , ?

5. , ,
?

6. , ?

7. , ?

8. - ?

9. , ?

10. , , , , ,
, . .?

11. ?

12. - , ,
- ?

265

13. ,
?

14. ?

15. , ?

16. , , ?

17. , ?

18. , ?

19. , ?

20. ?

21. , ?

: ,
; 8 14 ;
15 18 , 19 21
.

- .
, ,
: , ,
.

266

: ,
, .
, ,
1. .
2. .
3. .
4. .
5. .
6. .
7. .
8. .
9. , .
10. .
11. .
12. .
13. .
14. .
15. , .
16. , .
17. .
18. .
19. .
20. .
21. .
22. .
23. .
24. .
25. .
26. .
27. .
28. .
29. , .
30. .
31. .
32. .
33. .
34. .
35. .
36. .
37. .

267

38. .
39. .
40. .
41. .
42. .
43. , .
44. .
45. .
46. .
47. .
48. .
:
14, 1316, 2528 3740 .
58, 1720, 2932 4044 .
912, 2124, 3336 4548 .
. :
0 6 ;
7 11 ;
12 16 .


: . .
. . ._____________________________________________________

________________________________________________

1
2
3
4




()

268

7
8
9
10

11



: . . , . .
: , , ,
( , ) 5- , :
1 ;
2 ;
3 ;
4 ;
5 .
, ,

/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10


11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

,
,

269

270
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93


()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
,
()
,
()
,
()
()
()
()
()
,
()
,
()

()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()


94
95
96

271

()
()

, ,

/
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132

272
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172

,

,






()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
,
()
,

, ()
()


173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192

273

()
()
()
()
,
()

()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()

/
, ,
. . (2008)
:
/ , :
1

/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

274

8
9
10
11
12



,

,
, ,
,

,

13
14
15

: ,
1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14 , 2, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15 . ,
, , ,
, .
(. 2. 5, 11, 15), (. 3, 7, 8, 10,
12), (. 1, 4, 6, 9, 13, 14).

/

. . (2008)
: , ,
()
() 5- , :
1 ;
2 ;
3 ;
4 ;
5 .
.
/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

, , ,


,

,
, ,
, -


8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

275


,

, ,



,

, , ,


: 1 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 6, 12, 18, 19, 20.
. ,
.


. .
: . . : , , . ., 2000.


1

( , )

,
1

276
1

,

1

,
1

,
1

.
: Measures of personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. V. 1 /
J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, L. S. Wrightman (eds.). San Diego, N.-Y., Boston: Academic Press, 1991.
: 5-
. .
1. , . ,
, .
?

277

.
.
2. ,
?
1

.
.
3. , .
1

.
.
4. , ,
, .
1

.
.
5. .
1

.
.

. ,
. .
: Lewicky R. J., Stevenson M., Bunker B. B. The tree components of interpersonal trust: instrument development and differences across relationships // The
Ochio State University. WPS, Feb. 1997.
: .
, ,
, . , , 5- , :
1 ;
5 .
.
/

1
2

278
3

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

, ,


,
,

,





, ,

. . , . ,
. -, ,
. , - , ,
, . -,
: ;
, ; ,
. :
, , .
: . ,
74% ,
, , , ,
.

/

. . (2008)

. :

279

1. / : ,
.
2. .
3. .
4. / .
:
; ; ; ; .
,
. ,
: , ,
, .
: / . , , ,
, , ,
5- , :
1 ;
2 ;
3 ;
4 ;
5 .
.
/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

, , ,

,

,
, ,
, -


, ,



280

15
16
17

,

, , ,


18
19
20


1, 7, 13
2, 8, 14
3, 9, 15
4, 10, 16
5, 11, 17
6, 12, 18, 19, 20


. . . .
: .
,
. , .
, , :
_________, _____________

/
1
2

10

281


: . . . . 2. ., 2005.
. .: ,
.
:
. , , .
1. , ...
) ;
) ;
) .
2. ( , ) , - , ,
...
) ;
) ;

282

) .
3. - , ...
) (, . .);
) ;
) .
4. ( ),
,
...
) ;
) ;
) .
5. -
...
) ;
) ;
) .
: 2 , 1 ,
0 . . ,
.

. .

.
.
.
.
. , .
.

, 192102, -, . (. ), . 3, , . 7.
005-93, 2; 95 3005 .
19.10.12. 70100/16. . . . 23,220. 2000.
.
194044, -, . , 9.


.

4-

, , ,
. , , .
, , ,
, ,
. , , . ,
,
.


1. . 2.
3. , 4. 5.
6. 7. 8.
1990- 9.
10. 11. -,

. . ,
, , ,
, .
, , : , , , ,
,


1. 2.
3. 4. () 5.
6.
7. () 8.
9.
10. 11.
12.

.
, , .


. .
I. II. ()
III. IV.


. , .

,
. ,
, , ,
, . , .
,
-, , .
, .


1. 2. 3.
: 4. : 5. :
6.
: 7. , : , 9.
1.
2.