Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Poor
Content is typically confusing or is minimal and there are several factual errors.
All content Includes essential throughout the knowledge about the presentation is topic. accurate. There are no factual errors. Content covers topic with details and examples Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
Originality 30 points
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
Uses other people's ideas I(giving then credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., but these often distract from the presentation content.
Attractiveness 30 points
Makes a good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.
Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc., but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.
Presentation
CATEGORY Oral Presentation 20 points Excellent
Interesting, well rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
Good
Relatively interesting, with a smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.
Average
Poor
Delivery not smooth, Delivery not smooth but able to hold and audience audience attention attention lost. most of the time.
Kept eye contact with audience entire presentation. No paper was held up blocking face.
Stared at project or blocked face with paper, had back to audience most of the time
Volume 20 points
Took notes on Took some notes on Did not take notes presentations to help presentations on presentations with voting process Was mostly quiet Was disruptive Was not disruptive during presentations during presentations