Note on Bidders Proposal:

1. Khudairi
a. Quite extensive experience with 6 and 8 pipes in Iraq
b. Steel source: US Steel, which ISO 9001/ 4001 certified and has API Monogram
c. Khudairi doesnt provide their own ISO 9001 certificate
2. DMCC:
a. Pipe delivery allowance = +/- 3%
b. 3
rd
party inspection at purchasers account
c. 6 months delivery time
d. QA for HFW pipe (pipe is from Khopoli-India)
e. QA for 3LPE
f. QA for FB coating
3. ACME:
a. Statement: incorporate all those contract terms . .
b. Have supplied similar size (not clear the type of the pipe)
4. NOV Tuboscope
a. ISO 9001 certified
b. Tolerance for quantity is +/- 3%
c. Additional charge for weldability test (or provide previous test result)
d. Pipes come from Russia except for HFW (from Oman)
e. HFW pipe can be 6m long
f. Training will not include accommodation and transport
5. Arabian Pipeline
a. Pipes origin: Arcelor Mittal in Saudi
b. No office in Kurdistan
6. Tenaris
a. Proposed to supply weldability data from previous tests. If test to be performed
shall be discussed at bid stage
7. VGM
a. It is understand that VGM is only offering bare pipe
b. No explanation for coating
8. Tubos Reunidos
a. No office in Kurdistan
b. Pipe handling procedure is attached, no coated pipe handling is mentioned
9. Rigzone
a. The pipeline supplier is US Steel
b. Poor proposal content and presentation
10. Worldwide
a. No MNR reg no.
b. 6.5 months to to transfer to SING
c.