Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 89


2008 LEI Notes in

Public International Law

Disclaimer: The risk of use, non-use and misuse

of this material shall be solely borne by the user.

“Nam omnia praeclara tam difficilia quam rara sunt”

For all that is excellent and eminent is as difficult as it is rare

-Spinoza on Ethics
INTRODUCTION like processes.
Definition and
Public v Private International Law arbitration,
Basis of Public International Law reprisals and
1. Naturalist even war
2. Positivists 3. Source Derived from Consists mainly
3. Eccletics such sources from the
Three Grand Divisions as lawmaking
Relations between International and Municipal international authority of each
Law customs, state.
1. From the viewpoint of doctrine international
a. Dualist conventions
b. Monists and the
2. From the view of practice general
a. Doctrine of Transformation principles of
b. Doctrine of Incorporation law.
4. Subject Applies to Regulates the
¯°º°¯ relations relations of
DEFINITION OF Public International Law states inter se individuals
It is the body of rules and principles that are and other whether of the
recognized as legally binding and which govern international same nationality
the relations of states and other entities invested persons. or not.
with international legal personality. Formerly
known as “law of nations” coined by Jeremy 5. Infractions are Generally, entails
Bentham in 1789. Responsib usually only individual
ility for collective in responsibility.
Public International Law Distinguished From violation the sense that
Private International Law/Conflict of Laws it attaches
It is that part of the law of each State which directly to the
determines whether, in dealing with a factual state and not
situation, an event or transaction between private to its
individuals or entities involving a foreign element, nationals.
the law of some other State will be recognized.
Public Private are rules of international law binding?]
1. Nature Public is As a rule, Private
1. Naturalist –
international is national or
★ PIL is a branch of the great law of nature
in nature. It is municipal in
– the sum of those principles which ought
a law of a character.
to control human conduct, being founded
sovereign over Except when
on the very nature of man as a rational and
those embodied in a
social being. [Hugo Grotius]
subjected to treaty or
his sway convention, ★ PIL is binding upon States
[Openheim – becomes
Lauterpacht, international in 2. Positivist –
38.] character. It is a ★ Basis is to be found in the
law, not above, consent and conduct of States.
but between,
sovereign states
★ Tacit consent in the case of
customary international law.
and is, therefore,
a weaker law. ★ Express in conventional law.
[Openheim – ★ Presumed in the general law of
Lauterpacht, 38.] nations. [Cornelius van Bynkershoek]
2. Disputes are Recourse is with 3. Groatians or Eclectics –
Settlemen resolved municipal ★ Accepts the doctrine of natural law, but
t of through tribunals through maintained that States were accountable
Dispute international local only to their own conscience for the
modes of administrative observance of the duties imposed by
settlement – and judicial natural law, unless they had agreed to be

bound to treat those duties as part of as part of the law of the land…” However, no
positive law. [Emerich von Vattel] primacy is implied. Notes:
★ Middle ground
Q: What are these generally accepted
3 GRAND DIVISIONS principles?
1. Laws of Peace – normal relations between A: Pacta sunt servanda, sovereign equality among
states in the absence of war. states, principle of state immunity; right of states
to self-defense
2. Laws of War – relations between hostile or
belligerent states during wartime. Secretary Of Justice v. Judge Lantion and
Jimenez [GR 139465, 18 Jan. 2000]
3. Laws of Neutrality – relations between a non-
participant state and a participant state during FACTS: A possible conflict between the US-RP
wartime. This also refers to the relations among Extradition Treaty and Philippine law
non-participating states.

MUNICIPAL LAW International Law prevails over Municipal Law

From the Viewpoint of Doctrine HELD: NO.

1. Dualists –
★ International Law and Municipal Law are Under the doctrine of incorporation, rules of
two completely separate realms. international law form part of the law of the land
★ See distinctions Nos. 1,3 &4. and no further legislative action is needed to
make such rules applicable in the domestic
2. Monists – sphere.
★ Denies that PIL and Municipal Law are
essential different.
The doctrine of incorporation is applied whenever
★ In both laws, it is the individual persons
local courts are confronted with situations in
who in the ultimate analysis are regulated
which there appears to be a conflict between a
by the law. That both laws are far from
rule of international law and the provisions of the
being essentially different and must be
local state’s constitution/statute.
regarded as parts of the same juristic
conception. For them there is oneness or
unity of all laws. First, efforts should first be exerted to harmonize
★ PIL is superior to municipal law— them, so as to give effect to both. This is because
international law, being the one which it is presumed that municipal law was enacted
determines the jurisdictional limits of the with proper regard for the generally accepted
personal and territorial competence of principles of international law in observance of
States. the incorporation clause.

From the Viewpoint of Practice However, if the conflict is irreconcilable and a

1. International Tribunals choice has to be made between a rule of
★ PIL superior to Municipal Law international law and municipal law,
★ Art. 27, Vienna Convention in the law of jurisprudence dictates that the municipal courts
Treaties – A state “may not invoke the should uphold municipal law.
provisions of its internal law as justification
for its failure to perform a treaty” This is because such courts are organs of
★ State legally bound to observe its treaty municipal law and are accordingly bound by it in
obligations, once signed and ratified all circumstances. The fact that international law
was made part of the law of the land does not
2. Municipal Sphere – depends on what doctrine is pertain to or imply the primacy of international
followed: law over national/municipal law in the municipal
Doctrine of Incorporation -
Rules of international law form part of the law of
the land and no further legislative action is The doctrine of incorporation, as applied in most
needed to make such rules applicable in the countries, decrees that rules of international law
domestic sphere. [Sec. of Justice v. Lantion GRN are given equal standing with, but are not
139465, Jan. 18, 2000] superior to, national legislative enactments.

This is followed in the Philippines: In case of conflict, the courts should harmonize
Art. II, Sec. 2 – “The Philippines…adopts the both laws first and if there exists an unavoidable
generally accepted principles of international law contradiction between them, the principle of lex

posterior derogat priori - a treaty may repeal a Held: While sovereignty has traditionally been
statute and a statute may repeal a treaty - will deemed absolute and all-encompassing on the Notes:
apply. But if these laws are found in conflict with domestic level, it is however subject to
the Constitution, these laws must be stricken out restrictions and limitations voluntarily agreed to
as invalid. by the Philippines, expressly or impliedly, as a
member of the family of nations. By the doctrine
of incorporation, the country is bound by
In states where the constitution is the highest law
generally accepted principles of international law,
of the land, such as in ours, both statutes and
which are considered to be automatically part of
treaties may be invalidated if they are in conflict
our own laws. One of the oldest and most
with the constitution.
fundamental rules in international law is pacta
sunt servanda – international agreements must be
Supreme Court has the power to invalidate a performed in good faith. A state which has
treaty – Sec. 5(2)(a), Art. VIII, 1987 Constitution contracted valid international obligations is bound
to make in its legislations such modifications as
Q: What is the doctrine of incorporation? How may be necessary to ensure the fulfillment of the
is it applied by local courts? obligations.
Held: Under the doctrine of incorporation, rules
of international law form part of the law of the By their inherent nature, treaties really limit or
land and no further legislative action is needed to restrict the absoluteness of sovereignty. By their
make such rules applicable in the domestic voluntary act, nations may surrender some
sphere. aspects of their state power in exchange for
greater benefits granted by or derived from a
The doctrine of incorporation is applied whenever convention or pact. After all, states, like
municipal tribunals (or local courts) are individuals, live with coequals, and in pursuit of
confronted with situations in which there appears mutually covenanted objectives and benefits,
to be a conflict between a rule of international they also commonly agree to limit the exercise of
law and the provisions of the Constitution or their otherwise absolute rights. Thus, treaties
statute of the local state. Efforts should first be have been used to record agreements between
exerted to harmonize them, so as to give effect to States concerning such widely diverse matters as,
both since it is to be presumed that municipal law for example, the lease of naval bases, the sale or
was enacted with proper regard for the generally cession of territory, the termination of war, the
accepted principles of international law in regulation of conduct of hostilities, the formation
observance of the Incorporation Clause in Section of alliances, the regulation of commercial
2, Article II of the Constitution. In a situation relations, the settling of claims, the laying down
however, where the conflict is irreconcilable and of rules governing conduct in peace and the
a choice has to be made between a rule of establishment of international organizations. The
international law and municipal law, sovereignty of a state therefore cannot in fact and
jurisprudence dictates that municipal law should in reality be considered absolute. Certain
be upheld by the municipal courts for the reason restrictions enter into the picture: (1) limitations
that such courts are organs of municipal law and imposed by the very nature of membership in the
are accordingly bound by it in all circumstances. family of nations and (2) limitations imposed by
The fact that international law has been made treaty stipulations. (Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA
part of the law of the land does not pertain to or 18, May 2, 1997 [Panganiban])
imply the primacy of international law over
national or municipal law in the municipal sphere. Doctrine of Transformation –
The doctrine of incorporation, as applied in most Legislative action is required to make the treaty
countries, decrees that rules of international law enforceable in the municipal sphere.
are given equal standing with, but are not
superior to, national legislative enactments. Generally accepted rules of international law are
Accordingly, the principle of lex posterior derogat not per se binding upon the state but must first be
priori takes effect – a treaty may repeal a statute embodied in legislation enacted by the lawmaking
and a statute may repeal a treaty. In states body and so transformed into municipal law. This
where the Constitution is the highest law of the doctrine runs counter Art. II, Sec. 2, of the 1987
land, such as the Republic of the Philippines, both Constitution.
statutes and treaties may be invalidated if they A reading of the case of Kuroda v Jalandoni, [GRN
are in conflict with the Constitution. (Secretary L-2662 March 26, 1949], one may say that
of Justice v. Hon. Ralph C. Lantion, G.R. No. Supreme Court expressly ruled out the Doctrine of
139465, Jan. 18, 2000, En Banc [Melo]) Transformation when they declared that generally
accepted principles of international law form a
Q: Is sovereignty really absolute and all- part of the law of our nation even if the
encompassing? If not, what are its restrictions Philippines was not a signatory to the convention
and limitations? embodying them, for our Constitution has been
deliberately general and extensive in its scope

and is not cofined to the recognition of rules and

principles of international law as contained in Notes:
treaties to which our government may have been
or shall be a signatory. SOURCES

Pacta Sunt Servanda Article 38 of the Statute of International Court of

International agreements must be performed in Justice (SICJ) directs that the following be
Good Faith. A treaty engagement is not a mere considered before deciding a case:
moral obligation but creates a legally binding
obligation on the [arties. A state which has A. Primary
contracted a valid international obligation is I. Treaties or International Conventions
bound to make in its legislation such modifications II. International Custom
as may be necessary to ensure the fulfillment of III. General Principles of Law Recognized by
the obligations undertaken. Civilized Nations

Tañada vs. Angara B. Secondary

GRN 118295 May 2, 1997 IV. Judicial Decisions
V. Teachings of authoritative publicists
While sovereignty has traditionally been deemed
absolute and all encompassing on the domestic ¯°º°¯
level, it is however subject to restrictions and
limitations voluntarily agreed to by the A. Primary
Philippines, expressly or impliedly as a member of
the family of nations. The Constitution does not I. Treaties or International Conventions – 2
envision a hermit type isolation of the country KINDS:
from the rest of the world. 1. Contract Treaties [Traite-Contrat] –

★ Bilateral arrangements concerning matters

By the doctrine of incorporation, the country is
of particular or special interest to the
bound by generally accepted principles of
contracting parties
international law, which are considered to be
★ Source of “Particular International Law”
automatically part of our own laws.
★ BUT: May become primary sources of
international law when different contract
The constitutional policy of a "self-reliant and treaties are of the same nature, containing
independent national economy" does not practically uniform provisions, and are
necessarily rule out the entry of foreign concluded by a substantial number of States
investments, goods and services. It contemplates EX.: Extradition Treaties
neither “economic seclusion" nor "mendicancy in
the international community." 2. Law-Making Treaty [Traite-Loi] –
★ Concluded by a large number of States
for purposes of:
Concept of Sovereignty as Autolimitation 1. Declaring,
When the Philippines joined the United Nations as confirming, or defining their
one of its 51 charter members, it consented to understanding of what the law is on a
restrict its sovereign rights under the "concept of particular subject;
sovereignty as autolimitation. 2. Stipulating or laying
down new general rules for future
Q: A treaty was concurred between RP and international conduct;
China. Later, a law was passed which has 3. Creating new
conflicting provisions with the treaty. Rule. international institutions
A: A treaty is part of the law of the land. But as ★ Source of
internal law, it would not be superior to a “General International Law”
legislative act, rather it would be in the same
class as the latter. Thus, the latter law would be II. International Custom –
considered as amendatory of the treaty, being a Matters of international concern are not usually
subsequent law under the principle lex posterior covered by international agreements and many
derogat priori. (Abbas vs. COMELEC) States are not parties to most treaties;
international custom remains a significant source
of international law, supplementing treaty rules.

Custom is the practice that has grown up between

States and has come to be accepted as binding by
the mere fact of persistent usage over a long
period of time

Q: State your general understanding of the

It exists when a clear and continuous habit of primary sources and subsidiary sources of Notes:
doing certain things develops under the international law, giving an illustration of each.
CONVICTION that it is obligatory and right. (2003 Bar)
A: Under Article 38 of the Statute of International
This conviction is called “Opinio Juris” Court of Justice, the primary sources of
international law are the following:
When there’s no conviction that it is obligatory
and right, there’s only a Usage. 1. International
conventions, e.g. Vienna Convention on the
Usage is also a usual course of conduct, a long- Law of Treaties.
established way of doing things by States. 2. International
customs, e.g. cabotage, the prohibition
To elevate a mere usage into one of a customary against slavery, and the prohibition against
rule of international law, there must be a degree torture.
of constant and uniform repetition over a period 3. General principles of
of time coupled with opinio juris. law recognized by civilized nations, e.g.
prescription, res judicata, and due process.
III. General Principles of Law Recognized by
Civilized Nations The subsidiary sources of international law are
judicial decisions, subject to the provisions of
Salonga opines that resort is taken from general Article 59, e.g., the decision in the Anglo-
principles of law whenever no custom or treaty Norwegian Fisheries Case and Nicaragua v. US,
provision is applicable. The idea of “civilized and teachings of the most highly qualified
nations” was intended to restrict the scope of the publicists of various nations, e.g., Human Rights
provision to European States, however, at present in International Law by Lauterpacht and
the term no longer have such connotation, thus International Law by Oppenheim-Lauterpacht.
the term should include all nations.
Alternative A: Reflecting general international
Examples of general principles are: estoppel, law, Article 38(1) of the Statute of International
pacta sunt servanda, consent, res judicata and Court of Justice is understood as providing for
prescription; including the principles of justice, international convention, international custom,
equity and peace. and general principles of law as primary sources
of international law, while indicating that judicial
B. Secondary decisions and teachings of the most highly
qualified publicists as “subsidiary means for the
IV. Judicial decisions determination of the rules of law.”
The doctrine of stare decisis is not applicable in
international law per Art.59 of the ICJ which The primary sources may be considered as formal
states that “The decision of the Court has no sources in that they are considered methods by
binding force except between the parties and in which norms of international law are created and
respect to that particular case.” This means that recognized. A conventional or treaty norm and a
these decisions are not a direct source, but they customary norm is the product of the formation of
do exercise considerable influence as an impartial general practice accepted as law.
and well-considered statement of the law by
jurists made in the light of actual problems which By way of illustrating international Convention as
arise before them, and thus, accorded with great a source of law, we may refer to the principle
respect. embodied in Article 6 of the Vienna Convention on
the Law on Treaties which reads: “Every State
This includes decisions of national courts, possesses capacity to conclude treaties.” It tells
although they are not a source of law, the us what the law is and the process or method by
cumulative effect of uniform decisions of the which it cam into being. International Custom
courts of the most important States is to afford may be concretely illustrated by pacta sunt
evidence of international custom. servanda, a customary or general norm which
came about through extensive and consistent
V. Teachings of authoritative publicists – practice by a great number of states recognizing
including learned writers it as obligatory.
Such works are resorted to by judicial tribunals
not for the speculation of their authors The subsidiary means serves as evidence of law.
concerning what the law ought to be, but for A decision of the International Court of Justice,
trustworthy evidence of what the law really is. for example, may serve as material evidence
[Mr. Justice Gray in Paquete Habana case, 175 confirming or showing that the prohibition against
U.S. 677.] the use of force is a customary norm, as the
decision of the Court has demonstrated in the

Nicaragua Case. The status of a principle as a 1. De Jure

norm of international law may find evidence in 2. De Facto Notes:
the works of highly qualified publicists in c. Consequences of Recognition of
international law, such as McNair, Kelsen or Government
Oppenheim. C. Recognition of
a. Belligerency
b. 2 Senses of
SUBJECTS c. Requisites of
Subject Defined d. Consequences
Object Defined of Recognition of Belligerents
2 Concepts of Subjects of International Law e. Forms of
State as Subjects of International Law Recognition
Elements of a State
4. People ¯°º°¯
5. Territory
6. Government Subject Defined
a) 2 kinds A Subject is an entity that has an international
(1) De personality. An entity has an international
Jure personality if it can directly enforce its rights and
(2) De duties under international law. Where there is no
Facto – 3 kinds direct enforcement of accountability and an
b) 2 functions intermediate agency is needed, the entity is
(1) Consti merely an object not a subject of international
tuent law.
(2) Minist
rant Q: When does an entity acquire international
c) Effects of personality?
change in government A: When it has right and duties under
7. Sovereignty international law; can directly enforce its rights;
a) Kinds and may be held directly accountable for its
b) Characteristics obligations.
c) Effects of Objects Defined
change in sovereignty An Object is a person or thing in respect of which
Principle of State Continuity rights are held and obligations assumed by the
Fundamental Rights of States Subject. Thus, it is not directly governed by the
rules of international law. There is no direct
1. Right to Sovereignty and
enforcement and accountability. An intermediate
Independence; agency—the Subject—is required for the
2. Right to Property and enjoyment of its rights and for the discharge of its
Jurisdiction; obligations.
3. Right to Existence and Self-
2 Concepts:
4. Right to Equality
1. Traditional concept
5. Right to Diplomatic Intercourse ★ Only States are considered
Recognition subjects of international law.
Level of Recognition
A. Recognition of 2. Contemporary concept
State - 2 Schools of Thought ★ Individuals and international
a. Constitutive School organizations are also subjects because
b. Declaratory School they have rights and duties under
B. Recognition of international law. (Liang vs. People,
Government GRN 125865 [26 March 2001])
a. Criteria for Recognition
1. Objective Test – The STATE as subject of International Law
2. Subjective Test State is a community of persons more or less
(a) Tobar/Wilson numerous, permanently occupying a definite
Doctrine portion of territory, independent of external
(b) Estrada control, and possessing an organized government
Doctrine to which the great body of inhabitants render
b. Kinds of Recognition habitual obedience.

“By taking up the case of one of its subjects and

Q: The Japanese government confirmed that by resorting to diplomatic action or international Notes:
during the Second World War, Filipinas were judicial proceedings on his behalf, a State is in
among those conscripted as “comfort women” reality asserting its own rights – its right to
(prostitutes) for Japanese troops in various ensure, in the person of its subjects, respect for
parts of Asia. The Japanese government has the rules of international law.” (The Mavrommatis
accordingly launched a goodwill campaign and Palestine Concessions, 1 Hudson, World Court
offered the Philippine government substantial Reports 293, 302 [1924]) (Holy See, The v.
assistance for a program that will promote Rosario, Jr., 238 SCRA 524, 533-534, Dec. 1, 1994,
through government and non-governmental En Banc [Quiason])
organization women’s rights, child welfare,
nutrition and family health care. An executive Q: What is the status of an individual under
agreement is about to be signed for that public international law? (1981 Bar)
purpose. The agreement includes a clause A: According to Hanks Kelson, “while as a general
whereby the Philippine government rule, international law has as its subjects states
acknowledges that any liability to the comfort and obliges only immediately, it exceptionally
women or their descendants are deemed applies to individuals because it is to man that the
covered by the reparations agreements signed norms of international law apply, it is to man
and implemented immediately after the Second whom they restrain, it is to man who,
World War. Julian Iglesias, descendant of now international law thrusts the responsibilities of
deceased comfort woman, seeks you advise on law and order.”
the validity of the agreement. Advise him.
(1992 Bar) Q: Is the Vatican City a state?
A: The agreement is valid. The comfort woman A: YES!
and their descendant cannot assert individual
claims against Japan. As stated in Paris Moore v.
Reagan, 453 US 654, the sovereign authority of
the state to settle claims of its nationals against
foreign countries has repeatedly been recognized. Holy See v. Rosario
This may be made without the consent of the [GR 101949, 01 Dec. 1994]
nationals or even without consultation with them.
Since the continued amity between the State and
The Lateran Treaty established the STATEHOOD of
other countries may require a satisfactory
compromise of mutual claims, the necessary the Vatican City “for the purpose of assuring to
the Holy See absolute and visible independence
power to make such compromise has been
recognized. The settlement of such claims may and of guaranteeing to it indisputable sovereignty
also in the field of international relations”.
be made by executive agreement.

Q: What must a person who feels aggrieved by From the wordings of the Lateran Treaty, it is
the acts of a foreign sovereign do to espouse his difficult to determine whether the statehood is
cause? vested in the Holy See or in the Vatican City.
Held: Under both Public International Law and
Transnational Law, a person who feels aggrieved The Vatican City fits into none of the established
by the acts of a foreign sovereign can ask his own categories of states, and the attribution to it of
government to espouse his cause through “sovereignty” must be made in a sense different
diplomatic channels. from that in which it is applied to other states.

Private respondent can ask the Philippine

The Vatican City represents an entity organized
government, through the Foreign Office, to not for political but for ecclesiastical purposes
espouse its claims against the Holy See. Its first
and international objects.
task is to persuade the Philippine government to
take up with the Holy See the validity of its
claims. Of course, the Foreign Office shall first Despite its size and object, it has an independent
make a determination of the impact of its government of its own, with the Pope, who is also
espousal on the relations between the Philippine head of the Roman Catholic Church, as the Holy
government and the Holy See. Once the See or Head of State, in conformity with its
Philippine government decides to espouse the traditions, and the demands of its mission.
claim, the latter ceases to be a private cause. Indeed, its world-wide interests and activities are
such as to make it in a sense an “international
According to the Permanent Court of International state”.
Justice, the forerunner of the International Court
of Justice: It was noted that the recognition of the Vatican
City as a state has significant implication – that it
is possible for any entity pursuing objects

essentially different from those pursued by states wide interests and activities of the Vatican City
to be invested with international personality. are such as to make it in a sense an “international Notes:
Since the Pope prefers to conduct foreign
One authority wrote that the recognition of the
relations and enter into transactions as the Holy
Vatican City as a state has significant implication -
See and not in the name of the Vatican City, one
that it is possible for any entity pursuing objects
can conclude that in the Pope's own view, it is the
essentially different from those pursued by states
Holy See that is the international person.
to be invested with international personality.
The Philippines has accorded the Holy See the Inasmuch as the Pope prefers to conduct foreign
status of a foreign sovereign. The Holy See, relations and enter into transactions as the Holy
through its Ambassador, the Papal Nuncio, has See and not in the name of the Vatican City, one
had diplomatic representations with the can conclude that in the Pope's own view, it is the
Philippine government since 1957. This appears to Holy See that is the international person.
be the universal practice in international
relations. The Republic of the Philippines has accorded the
Holy See the status of a foreign sovereign. The
Q: Discuss the Status of the Vatican and the Holy See, through its Ambassador, the Papal
Holy See in International Law. Nuncio, has had diplomatic representations with
Held: Before the annexation of the Papal States the Philippine government since 1957. This
by Italy in 1870, the Pope was the monarch and appears to be the universal practice in
he, as the Holy See, was considered a subject of international relations. (Holy See, The v. Rosario,
International Law. With the loss of the Papal Jr., 238 SCRA 524, 533-534, Dec. 1, 1994, En Banc
States and the limitation of the territory under [Quiason])
the Holy See to an area of 108.7 acres, the
position of the Holy See in International Law
became controversial.

In 1929, Italy and the Holy See entered into the

Lateran Treaty, where Italy recognized the
exclusive dominion and sovereign jurisdiction of ELEMENTS OF A STATE:
the Holy See over the Vatican City. It also A. People –
recognized the right of the Holy See to receive ★ the inhabitants of the State
foreign diplomats, to send its own diplomats to ★ must be numerous enough to be
foreign countries, and to enter into treaties self-sufficing and to defend themselves
according to International Law. and small enough to be easily
administered and sustained.
The Lateran Treaty established the statehood of ★ the aggregate of individuals of
the Vatican City “for the purpose of assuring to both sexes who live together as a
the Holy See absolute and visible independence community despite racial or cultural
and of guaranteeing to it indisputable sovereignty differences
also in the field of international relations.” ★ groups of people which cannot
comprise a State:
In view of the wordings of the Lateran Treaty, it is 1. Amazons – not of both sexes;
difficult to determine whether the statehood is cannot perpetuate themselves
vested in the Holy See or in the Vatican City.
Some writers even suggested that the treaty
2. Pirates – considered as outside
the pale of law, treated as an enemy
created two international persons - the Holy See
of all mankind; “hostis humani
and Vatican City.
The Vatican City fits into none of the established
B. Territory –
categories of states, and the attribution to it of
★ the fixed portion of the surface
“sovereignty” must be made in a sense different
of the earth inhabited by the people of
from that in which it is applied to other states. In
the State
a community of national states, the Vatican City
represents an entity organized not for political ★ the size is irrelevant – San
but for ecclesiastical purposes and international Marino v. China
objects. Despite its size and object, the Vatican ★ BUT, practically, must not be
City has an independent government of its own, too big as to be difficult to administer
with the Pope, who is also head of the Roman and defend; but must not be too small as
Catholic Church, as the Holy See or Head of State, to unable to provide for people’s needs
in conformity with its traditions, and the demands ★ Q: Why important to
of its mission in the world. Indeed, the world- determine?

A: Determines the area over which the military forces, by organizing a local government
State exercises jurisdiction unit, and by awarding petroleum drilling rights, Notes:
★ Nomadic tribe not a State among other political and administrative acts. In
1978, it confirmed its sovereign title by the
Q: What comprises the Philippine Archipelago? promulgation of Presidential Decree No. 1596,
A: §1, Article 1, 1987 Philippine Constitution. which declared the Kalayaan Island Group part of
Philippine territory.
“The national territory comprises the Philippine
archipelago, with all the islands and waters C. Government –
embraced therein, and all other territories over ★ the agency or instrumentality
which the Philippines has sovereignty or through which the will of the State is
jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial, formulated, expressed and realized
and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, ★ 2 KINDS:
the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and 1. De Jure
other submarine areas. The waters around,  One with rightful title
between, and connecting the islands of the but not power or control, because:
archipelago, regardless of their breadth and ☀ Power was
dimensions, form part of the internal waters of withdrawn;
the Philippines.” ☀ Has not yet
entered into the exercise of
Q: The provision deleted the reference to power
territories claimed “by historic right or legal 2. De Facto
title.” Does this mean that we have abandoned  A government of fact
claims to Sabah?  Actually exercises
A: NO! This is not an outright or formal power or control, but has NO legal
abandonment of the claim. Instead, the claim was title
left to a judicial body capable of passing  3 Kinds:
judgment over the issue
a) By revolution –
★ The definition covers the that which is established by the
following territories: inhabitants who rise in revolt
1. Ceded to the US under the against and depose the
Treaty of Paris of 10 Dec. 1898 legitimate regime;
2. Defined in the 07 Nov. 1900
Treaty between US and Spain, on the EX. the Commonwealth
following islands; established by Oliver Cromwell
3. Cagayan; which supplanted the monarchy
4. Sulu; under Charles I of England
5. Sibuto
6. Defined in the 02 Jan. 1930 b) By
Treaty between the US and the UK over government of paramount force
the Turtle and Mangsee Islands – that which is established in the
7. Island of Batanes course of war by the invading
8. Contemplated in the phrase forces of one belligerent in the
“belonging to the Philippines by historic territory of the other
right or legal title” belligerent, the government of
which is also displaced
Q: What is the basis of the Philippine’s claim to
a part of the Spratlys Islands? (2000 Bar) EX. the Japanese occupation
A: The basis of the Philippine claim is effective government in the Philippines
occupation of a territory not subject to the which replaced the
sovereignty of another state. The Japanese Commonwealth government
forces occupied the Spratly Islands Group during during WWII
the Second World War. However, under the San
Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951, Japan formally c) By secession –
renounced all right and claim to the Spratlys. The that which is established by the
San Francisco Treaty or any other international inhabitants of a state who cedes
agreement, however, did not designate any therefrom without overthrowing
beneficiary state following the Japanese its government
renunciation of right. Subsequently, the Spratlys
became terra nullius and was occupied by the EX. the confederate government
Philippines in the title of sovereignty. Philippine during the American Civil War
sovereignty was displayed by open and public which, however, did not seek to
occupation of a number of islands by stationing depose the union government

Constitution has made compulsory the

Q: Is the Cory Aquino Government a de facto or performance of ministrant functions. Notes:
de jure government?
A: De Jure! While initially the Aquino Examples:
Government was a de facto government because
it was established thru extra-constitutional Promote social justice;
measures, it nevertheless assumed a de jure Land reform
status when it subsequently recognized by the Provide adequate social services
international community as the legitimate
government of the Republic of the Philippines. Q: What is the mandate of the Philippine
Moreover, a new Constitution was drafted and Government?
overwhelmingly ratified by the Filipino people and A: Art. II, Sec. 4 – “The prime duty of the
national elections were held for that purpose. Government is to serve and protect the people…”
[Lawyers League for a Better Philippines v. Thus, whatever good is done by government –
Aquino, G.R. No. 73748 (1986)] attributed to the State; whatever harm is done by
the government – attributed to the government
★ The Cory government won! All alone, not the State
de facto governments lost in the end!
Harm justifies the replacement of the government
★ 2 Functions: by revolution – “Direct State Action”
1. Constituent – constitutes the
It is well settled that as far as the rights of the
Examples: predecessor government are concerned, they are
(a) Keeping of order and providing inherited in toto by the successor government.
for the protection of persons and Regarding obligations, distinction is made
property from violence and robber; according to the manner of the establishment of
(b) Fixing of legal relations between the new government.
spouses and between parents and
children; The rule is that where the new government was
(c) Regulation of the holding, organized by virtue of a constitutional reform duly
transmission, and interchange of ratified in a plebiscite, the obligations of the
property, and the determination of replaced government are also completely assumed
liabilities for debt and crime; by the former. Conversely, where the new
(d) Determination of contractual government was established through violence, as
relations between individuals; by a revolution, it may lawfully reject the purely
(e) Definition and punishment of personal or political obligations of the
crimes predecessor government but not those contracted
(f) Administration of justice in civil by it in the ordinary course of official business.
(g) Administration of political
duties, privileges, and relations of
citizens; Summary:
(h) Dealings of the States with A. Change of
foreign powers Government by Constitutional Reform
★ The
new government inherits all the rights
2. Ministrant – undertaken to and obligations of the former government
advance the general interests of society –
merely OPTIONAL. B. Change by
Extra-Constitutional Means
Examples: ★ Rights – all are inherited;
(a) Public works; ★ Obligations – distinguish:
(b) Public charity; ★ Contracted in the regular course
(c) Regulation of trade and industry of business – Inherited;
Q: Is the distinction still relevant? EX.: Payment of postal money orders
A: No longer relevant! bought by an individual

ACCFA v. CUGCO [30 SCRA 649] ★ Purely Personal/Political

Obligations – Not bound! May
Constitution has repudiated the laissez faire reject!
policy EX.: Payment for arms bought by old
government to fight the rebels

☀ the different
sectors molding public opinion Notes:
Q: The Federation of Islamabad concluded an
agreement with the republic of Baleria when 2. Internal and External
the leaders of Islamabad made a state visit to Sovereignty
the latter. The agreement concerns the
facilitation of entry of Balerian contract Internal –
workers in Islamabad. Thereafter, a revolution ☀ the power of a
broke out in Islamabad which is now governed State to control its internal affairs
by a revolutionary junta. Most of Balerian
contract workers were arrested by Islamabad External -
Immigration officers for not having with them ☀ the power of
the necessary papers and proper documents. the State to direct its relations with
Upon learning of the incident, the government other States
of Baleria lodged a formal protest with the ☀ also called
Islamabad revolutionary government invoking “Independenc”e
certain provisions of the aforementioned
agreement. The latter replied, however that Characteristics of Sovereignty
the new government is not internationally 1. permanent
bound by the agreement that was concluded by 2. exclusivity
the former government of Islamabad and 3. comprehensiveness
Baleria. Moreover, Islamabad further 4. absoluteness
contended that the agreement was contrary to 5. individuality
its plasmatic law. Is the Islamabad 6. inalienability
revolutionary government under obligation 7. imprescriptibility
pursuant to international law, to comply with
what was agreed upon and set forth in the Q: What happens to sovereignty if the acts of
agreement concluded between Baleria and its authority cannot be exercised by the legitimate
former government? Reasons. (1985 Bar) authority?
A: Yes. A new government is exempt from A: Sovereignty not suspended.
obligation of treaties entered into by the previous
government only with respect to those whose EX.: Japanese Occupation during WWII
subject matter is political in nature. The ★ Sovereignty remained with the
facilitation of entry by Balerian contract workers US
to Islamabad is non political. Hence, the treaty ★ Japanese merely took over the
embodying such agreement is binding on the new exercise of acts of sovereignty
government of Islamabad. Nor may the new
government evade its international obligation on Q: In this case, what are the effects on the
the ground that the agreement is contrary to its laws?
Plasmatic law. The rule is settled that a state A: Political Laws -
cannot evade its international obligation by GR: Suspended!
invoking its internal law. It is presumed that the ★ Subject to revival under jus
treaty is in conformity with its internal law. postliminium – i.e., once the legitimate
D. Sovereignty – authority returns, the political laws are
★ the supreme and uncontrollable revived
power inherent in a State by which that
State is governed. May be legal or
political ★ Jus Postliminium – roman law
★ KINDS: concept. If a Roman Citizen is captured,
1. Legal and Political he loses his rights as a Roman citizen,
Sovereignty but once he returns to Rome, he recovers
all those rights again
Legal - XPN:
☀ the authority (a) Laws of Treason – Not suspended!
which has the power to issue final ★ Preservation of allegiance to
commands sovereign does not demand positive
☀ Congress is action, but only a passive attitude or
legal sovereign forbearance from adhering to the enemy
by giving the latter aid and comfort
Political - (Laurel v. Misa)
☀ the power
behind the legal sovereign, or the (b) Combatants – not covered by said rule
sum of the influences that operate
upon it

★ Thus, AFP members still covered

by National Defense Act, Articles of War, Q: Distinguish between Spanish secession to the Notes:
etc. (Ruffy v. Chief of Staff) U.S. and Japanese occupation during WWII
★ Rule applies only to civilians regarding the political laws of the Philippines.
A: There being no change of sovereignty during
Civil Laws: the belligerent occupation of Japan, the political
GR: Remains in force laws of the occupied territory are merely
XPN: Amended or superseded by affirmative suspended, subject to revival under jus
act of belligerent occupant postliminium upon the end of the occupation. In
both cases, however, non-political laws, remains
Q: What happens to judicial decisions made effective.
during the occupation?
A: Those of a Political Complexion – NOTES:
★ automatically annulled upon Members of the armed forces are still covered by
restoration of legitimate authority the National Defense Act, the Articles of War and
★ conviction for treason against other laws relating to the armed forces even
the belligerent during the Japanese occupation.

Non-political A person convicted of treason against the

★ remains valid Japanese Imperial Forces was, after the
★ EX.: Conviction for occupation, entitled to be released on the ground
defamation that the sentence imposed on him for his political
offense had ceased to be valid but not on non-
1. Political Laws are deemed ABROGATED.
Q: Why? Q: May an inhabitant of a conquered State be
A: They govern relations between the State convicted of treason against the legitimate
and the people. sovereign committed during the existence of
2. Non-Political Laws generally continue in A: YES. Although the penal code is non-political
operation. law, it is applicable to treason committed against
Q: Why? the national security of the legitimate
A: Regulates only private relations government, because the inhabitants of the
occupied territory were still bound by their
XPN: allegiance to the latter during the enemy
(a) Changed by the new sovereign occupation. Since the preservation of the
(b) Contrary to institutions of the new allegiance or the obligation of fidelity and
sovereign obedience of a citizen or subject to his
government or sovereign does not demand from
Q: What is the effect of change of sovereignty him a positive action, but only passive attitude or
when the Spain ceded the Philippines to the forbearance from adhering to the enemy by giving
U.S.? the latter aid and comfort, the occupant has no
A: The effect is that the political laws of the power, as a corollary of the preceding
former sovereign are not merely suspended but consideration, to repeal or suspend the operation
abrogated. As they regulate the relations of the law of treason.
between the ruler and the rules, these laws fall to
the ground ipso facto unless they are retained or Q: Was there a case of suspended allegiance
re-enacted by positive act of the new sovereign. during the Japanese occupation?
Non-political laws, by contrast, continue in A: None. Adoption of the petitioner's theory of
operation, for the reason also that they regulate suspended allegiance would lead to disastrous
private relations only, unless they are changed by consequences for small and weak nations or
the new sovereign or are contrary to its states, and would be repugnant to the laws of
institutions. humanity and requirements of public conscience,
for it would allow invaders to legally recruit or
Q: What is the effect of Japanese occupation to enlist the quisling inhabitants of the occupied
the sovereignty of the U.S. over the Philippines? territory to fight against their own government
A: Sovereignty is not deemed suspended although without the latter incurring the risk of being
acts of sovereignty cannot be exercised by the prosecuted for treason. To allow suspension is to
legitimate authority. Thus, sovereignty over the commit political suicide.
Philippines remained with the U.S. although the
Americans could not exercise any control over the Q: Is sovereignty really absolute?
occupied territory at the time. What the A: In the domestic sphere – YES! In international
belligerent occupant took over was merely the sphere – NO!
exercise of acts of sovereignty.

Tañada, et al. vs. Angara, et al. State is not lost when one of its elements is
[GR 118295, 02 May 1997] changed; it is lost only when at least one of its Notes:
elements is destroyed. State does not lose its
identity but remains one and the same
While sovereignty has traditionally been deemed international person notwithstanding changes in
absolute and all-encompassing on the domestic the form of its government, territory, people, or
level, it is however subject to restrictions and sovereignty. See Holy See vs. Rosario (238 SCRA
limitations voluntarily agreed to by the 524)
Philippines, expressly or impliedly, as a member
of the family of nations. From the moment of its creation, the State
continues as a juristic being, despite changes in
By the doctrine of incorporation, the country is its elements. EX.:
bound by generally accepted principles of (1) Reduction of population due to natural
international law, which are considered to be calamity
automatically part of our own laws. (2) Changes in territory
However, the disappearance of any of the
One of the oldest and most fundamental rules in elements causes the extinction of the state.
international law is pacta sunt servanda –
international agreements must be performed in Q: In the famous Sapphire Case, Emperor Louis
good faith. Napoleon filed damage suit on behalf of France
in an American Court, but he was deposed and
replaced as head of State pendent elite. Was
A treaty engagement is not a mere moral
the action abated? (Bar)
obligation but creates a legally binding obligation
A: No, because it had in legal effect been filed by
on the parties. By their inherent nature, treaties
France, whose legal existence had not been
limit or restrict the absoluteness of sovereignty.
affected by change in head of its government.
By their voluntary act, nations may surrender
Napoleon had sued not in his personal capacity
some aspects of their state power in exchange for
but officially as sovereign of France. Hence, upon
greater benefits granted by or derived from a
recognition of the duly authorized representative
convention or pact.
of the new government, the litigation could
States, like individuals, live with coequals, and in
pursuit of mutually covenanted objectives and RIGHTS OF THE STATE
benefits, they also commonly agree to limit the
exercise of their otherwise absolute rights. Fundamental Rights of States [ S P E E D ]
1. Right to Sovereignty
Thus, a state’s sovereignty cannot in fact and in and Independence;
reality be considered absolute. Certain
restrictions enter into the picture: 2. Right to Property and
Limitations imposed by the very nature of
membership in the family of nations; and 3. Right to Existence
Limitations imposed by treaty stipulations. and Self-Defense
4. Right to Equality
Thus, when the Philippines joined the UN as one 5. Right to Diplomatic
of its 51 charter members, it consented to restrict Intercourse
its sovereign rights under the “concept of
★ The most elementary and
The underlying consideration in this partial important right of a State
surrender of sovereignty is the reciprocal ★ All other rights flow from this
commitment of the other contracting states in right
granting the same privilege and immunities to the ★ Recognized in the UN Charter,
Philippines, its officials and its citizens. Article 51:

“Nothing in the present charter shall impair

Clearly, a portion of sovereignty may be waived
the inherent right of individual or collective
without violating the Constitution, based on the
self-defense if an armed attack occurs against
rationale that the Philippines “adopts the
a Member of the UN, until the SC has taken
generally accepted principles of international law
measures necessary to maintain international
as part of the law of the land and adheres to the
peace and security. Measures taken by
policy of . . . cooperation and amity with all
Members in the exercise of this right of self-
defense shall be immediately reported to the
SC and shall not in any way affect the
Principle of State Continuity

authority and responsibility of the SC under Nations Charter and it does not fall under any of
the present Charter to take at any time such the exceptions to that prohibition. Notes:
action as it deems necessary in order to
maintain or restore international peace and The UN Charter in Article 2(4) prohibits the use of
security.” force in the relations of states by providing that
all members of the UN “shall refrain in their
★ Art. II, Sec. 2 – “The international relations from the threat or use of
Philippines renounces war as an instrument of force against the territorial integrity or political
national policy…” independence of any state, or in any other
★ This prohibits an manner inconsistent with the purposes of the
offensive/aggressive war United Nations.” This mandate does not only
★ But, it allows DEFENSIVE WAR! outlaw war; it encompasses all threats of and acts
★ Thus, when attacked, the of force or violence short of war.
Philippines can exercise its inherent right of
existence and self-defense As thus provided, the prohibition is addressed to
★ This right is a generally all UN members. However, it is now recognized
accepted principle of international law – thus, as a fundamental principle in customary
it is part of our law of the land, under the international law and, as such, is binding on all
Incorporation Clause (Art. II, Sec. 2, 1987 members of the international community.
The action taken by the allied forces cannot be
Q: State the occasions when the use of force justified under any of the three exceptions to the
may be allowed under the UN Charter. prohibition against the use of force which the UN
A: There are only two occasions when the use of Charter allows. These are: (1) inherent right of
force is allowed under the UN Charter. The first individual or collective self-defense under Article
is when it is authorized in pursuance of the 51; (2) enforcement measure involving the use of
enforcement action that may be decreed by the armed forces by the UN Security Council under
Security Council under Art. 42. The second is Article 42; and (3) enforcement measure by
when it is employed in the exercise of the regional arrangement under Article 53, as
inherent right of self-defense under conditions authorized by the UN Security Council. The allied
prescribed in Art. 51. (Justice Isagani A. Cruz, in forces did not launch military operations and did
an article entitled “A New World Order” written not occupy Iraq on the claim that their action was
in his column “Separate Opinion” published in the in response to an armed attacked by Iraq, of
March 30, 2003 issue of the Philippines Daily which there was none.
Moreover, the action of the alleged allied forces
Q: Not too long ago, “allied forces”, led by was taken in defiance or disregard of the Security
Amercian and British armed forces, invaded Iraq Council Resolution No. 1441 which set up “an
to “liberate Iraqis and destroy suspected enhanced inspection regime with the aim of
weapons of mass destruction.” The Security bringing to full and verified completion the
Council of the United Nations failed to reach a disarmament process,” giving Iraq “a final
consensus on whether to support or oppose the opportunity to comply with its disarmament
“war of liberation.” Can the action taken by obligations.” This resolution was in the process of
the allied forces find justification in implementation; so was Iraq’s compliance with
International Law? Explain. (2003 Bar) such disarmament obligations.
A: The United States and its allied forces cannot
justify their invasion of Iraq on the basis of self- Q: On 31 October 2001, members of Ali Baba, a
defense under Article 51, attack by Iraq, and political extremist organization based in and
there was no necessity for anticipatory self- under the protection of Country X and
defense which may be justified under customary espousing violence worldwide as a means of
international law. Neither can they justify their achieving its objective, planted high-powered
invasion on the ground that Article 42 of the explosives and bombs at the International Trade
Charter of the United Nations permits the use of Tower (ITT) in Jewel City in Country Y, a
force against a State if it is sanctioned by the member of the United Nations. As a result of
Security Council. Resolution 1441, which gave the bombing and the collapse of the 100-story
Iraq a final opportunity to disarm or face serious twin towers, about 2000 people, including
consequences, did not authorize the use of armed women and children were killed or injured and
force. billions of dollars in property were lost.

Alternative A: In International Law, the action Immediately after the incident, Ali Baba,
taken by the allied forces cannot find speaking through its leader Bin Derdandat,
justification. It is covered by the prohibition admitted and owned responsibility for the
against the use of force prescribed by the United bombing of ITT, saying that it was done to
pressure Country Y to release captured

members of the terrorist group. Ali Baba invoking the modern view that a state does not
threatened to repeat its terrorist acts against have to wait until the potential enemy fires first. Notes:
Country Y if the latter and its allies failed to The cowboy from Texas says that outdrawing the
accede to Ali Baba’s demands. In response, foe who is about to shoot is an act of self-
Country Y demanded that Country X surrender defense.
and deliver Bin Derdandat to the government
authorities of Country Y for the purpose of trial Art. 51 says, however, that there must first be an
and “in the name of justice.” Country X refused “armed attack” before a state can exercise its
to accede to the demand of Country Y. inherent right of self-defense, and only until the
Security Council, to which the aggression should
What action or actions can Country Y legally be reported, shall have taken the necessary
take against Ali Baba and Country X to stop the measures to maintain international peace and
terrorist activities of Ali Baba and dissuade security. It was the United States that made the
Country X from harboring and giving protection “armed attack” first, thus becoming the
to the terrorist organization? Support your aggressor, not Iraq. Iraq is now not only
answer with reasons. (2002 Bar) exercising its inherent right of self-defense as
recognized by the UN Charter. (Justice Isagani A.
A: (1) Country Y may exercise the right of self- Cruz, in an article entitled “A New World Order”
defense, as provided under Article 51 of the UN written in his column “Separate Opinion”
Charter “until the Security Council has taken published in the March 30, 2003 issue of the
measure necessary to maintain international Philippines Daily Inquirer)
peace and security.” Self-defense enables
Country Y to use force against Country X as well Q: Will the subsequent discovery of weapons of
as against the Ali Baba organization. mass destruction in Iraq after its invasion by the
US justify the attack initiated by the latter?
(2) It may bring the matter to the Security Council A: Even if Iraq’s hidden arsenal is discovered – or
which may authorize sanctions against Country X, actually used – and the United States is justified
including measure invoking the use of force. in its suspicions, that circumstance will not
Under Article 4 of the UN Charter, Country Y may validate the procedure taken against Iraq. It is
use force against Country X as well as against the like searching a person without warrant and
Ali Baba organization by authority of the UN curing the irregularity with the discovery of
Security Council. prohibited drugs in his possession. The process
cannot be reversed. The warrant must first be
Alternative A: Under the Security Council issued before the search and seizure can be
Resolution No. 1368, the terrorist attack of Ali made.
Baba may be defined as a threat to peace, as it
did in defining the 11 September 2001 attacks The American invasion was made without
against the United States. The resolution permission from the Security Council as required
authorizes military and other actions to respond by the UN Charter. Any subsequent discovery of
to terrorist attacks. However, the use of military the prohibited biological and chemical weapons
force must be proportionate and intended for the will not retroactively legalize that invasion, which
purpose of detaining the persons allegedly was, legally speaking, null and void ab initio.
responsible for the crime and to destroy military (Justice Isagani A. Cruz, in an article entitled “A
objectives used by the terrorists. New World Order” written in his column
“Separate Opinion” published in the March 30,
The fundamental principles of international 2003 issue of the Philippines Daily Inquirer)
humanitarian law should be respected. Country Y
cannot be granted sweeping discretionary powers Q: State B, relying on information gathered by
that include the power to decide what states are its intelligence community to the effect that its
behind the terrorist organizations. It is for the neighbor, State C, is planning an attack on its
Security Council to decide whether force may be nuclear plan and research institute, undertook
used against specific states and under what a “preventive” attack in certain bases on State
conditions the force may be used. C located near the border of the two states. As
a result, State C presented the incident to the
Q: Is the United States justified in invading Iraq UN General Assembly but the latter referred it
invoking its right to defend itself against an to the UN Security Council as a matter, which
expected attack by Iraq with the use of its disturbs or threatens “international peace and
biological and chemical weapons of mass security”. State B argued that it was acting
destruction? within the legal bounds of Article 51 of the UN
A: The United States is invoking its right to Charter and that it was a permitted use of force
defend itself against an expected attack by Iraq in self-defense and against armed attack. Is
with the use of its biological and chemical State B responsible under International Law?
weapons of mass destruction. There is no Did State B act within the bounds set forth in
evidence of such a threat, but Bush is probably

the UN Charter on the use of force in self- Generally Intervention is Prohibited (Drago
defense? (1985 Bar) Doctrine) Notes:
A: An armed attack is not a requirement for the ★ Prohibits intervention for the
exercise of the right of self-defense. However, collection of contractual debts, public or
the attack of State B on State C cannot be private
justified as an act of self-defense under Art. 51 of ★ Formulated by Foreign Minister
the UN Charter considering that the danger Luis Drago (Argentina), in reaction to the
perceived by State B was not imminent. State B Venezuelan Incident
ought to have exhausted peaceful and pacific
methods of settlements instead of resorting to the Venezuelan Incident
use of force. In 1902, UK, Germany and Italy blockaded
Venezuelan ports to compel it to pay its
Q: Who can declare war? contractual debts leading Foreign Minister Drago
A: No one! The Constitution has withheld this to formulate a doctrine that “ a public debt
power from the government. What the cannot give rise to the right of intervention. This
Constitution allows is a declaration of a “State of principle was later adopted in the Second Hague
War”. Under Art. VI, Sec. 23(1) – “Congress, by a Conference, but subject to the qualification that
vote of 2/3 of both Houses, in joint session the debtor state should not refuse or neglect to
assembled, voting separately, shall have the sole reply to an offer of arbitration or after accepting
power to declare the existence of a state of war. the offer, prevent any compromis from being
This means that we are already under attack agreed upon, or after the arbitration, fail to
submit to the award, the qualification is known as
Q: What are the effects when Congress declares the Porter resolution.
a state of war?
A: 1. Art. VI, Sec. 23 – “In times of war…the Pacific Blockade
Congress may, by law, authorize the President, ★ one imposed during times of
for a limited period and subject to such peace
restrictions as it may prescribe, to exercise ★ were the countries at war, then
powers necessary and proper to carry out a a blockade is a legitimate measure
declared national policy. Unless sooner withdrawn ★ in fact, a blockade must not be
by resolution of the Congress, such powers shall violated by a neutral State
cease upon the next adjournment thereof.” ★ if breached, the neutral vessel is
2. Art. VII, Sec. 18 – “The President shall be the
Commander-in-Chief of all armed forces…and WHEN INTERVENTION ALLOWED, Exceptions
whenever it becomes necessary, he may call out 1. Intervention as an Act of
such armed forces to prevent or suppress… Individual and Collective Self-Defense
invasion…In case, invasion…when the public safety 2. Intervention by Treaty
requires it, he may, for a period not exceeding 60 Stipulation or by Invitation
days, suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas
corpus or place the Philippines or any part thereof “Intervention by Invitation”
under martial law…” ★ Presupposes that the
inviting State is not a mere puppet of the
☀ This is in intervening State
line with the UN Charter, which also ★ EX.: Hungary
renounces war  In 1956, Hungary was in
☀ As internal turmoil, and asked the
charter-member of the UN, our Soviet forces to intervene
Constitution also renounces war as an  While the intervention
instrument of national policy was upon invitation, it was still
condemned because the Hungarian
Intervention puppet
It is “the dictatorial interference by a State in the
internal affairs of another State, or in the 3. By UN Authorization and
relations between other States, which is either Resolution
forcible or backed by the threat of force.” ★ EX.: 1. Korean War
 In fact, it is
Intervention is Different from “Intercession” UN itself that intervened
☀ Intercession is allowed!
☀ EX.: Diplomatic Protest, Tender of 2. 1990 Iraqi Annexation of Kuwait
Advice  There was an SC Resolution,
authorizing the US-led multilateral
force to intervene

demonstrations, blockade, and other operations

4. On Humanitarian Grounds by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the UN.” Notes:
★ This has recently evolved by
international custom In the exercise of right of self-defense, against
★ Thus, has become a primary source armed attacks – Art. 51:
of international law
★ EX.: 1. Intervention in Somalia “Nothing in the present charter shall impair
the inherent right of individual or collective
2. Intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo self-defense if an armed attack occurs against
 No UN Resolution, but NATO a Member of the UN, until the SC has taken
intervened militarily measures necessary to maintain international
 Ground: There was ethnic peace and security. Measures taken by
cleansing by Serbs of ethnic Members in the exercise of this right of self-
minorities defense shall be immediately reported to the
SC and shall not in any way affect the
3. Intervention in East Timor authority and responsibility of the SC under
 Purpose: To protect the the present Charter to take at any time such
East Timorese action as it deems necessary in order to
Q: At the United Nations, the Arab League, maintain or restore international peace and
through Syria, sponsors a move to include in the security.”
agenda of the General Assembly the discussion
of this matter: “The Muslim population of NOTE: There is a limited definition of armed
Mindanao, Philippines has expressed the desire attacks – Nicargua v. United States
to secede from the Republic of the Philippines
in order to constitute a separate and Nicaragua v. United States
independent state and has drawn attention to
the probability that the continuation of the “195. In the case of individual self-defense, the
armed conflict in Mindanao constitutes a threat exercise of this right is subject to the State
to peace.” You are asked by the Philippine concerned having been the victim of an armed
Government to draft a position paper opposing attack. Reliance on collective self-defense of
the move. Briefly outline your arguments course does not remove the need for this. There
supporting the Philippine position, specifically appears now to be general agreement on the
discussing the tenability of Arab League’s action nature of the acts which can be treated as
from the standpoint of International Law. (1984 constituting armed attacks. In particular, it may
Bar) be considered to be agreed that an armed attack
A: The Muslim secessionist movement is not an must be understood as including not merely action
international dispute, which under Article 35(1) of by regular armed forces across an international
the UN Charter, a member of the United Nations border, but also 'the sending by or on behalf of a
may bring to the attention of the Security Council State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or
or the General Assembly. Such dispute can arise mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force
only between two or more States. The attempt of against another State of such gravity as to amount
the Arab League to place on the agenda of the to' (inter alia) an actual armed attack conducted
General Assembly the Muslim problem in Mindanao by regular forces, 'or its substantial involvement
can only be views as an interference with a purely therein'. This description, contained in Article 3,
domestic affair. paragraph (g), of the Definition of Aggression
annexed to General Assembly resolution 3314
When Use of Force is Allowed under the UN (XXIX), may be taken to reflect customary
Charter By UNSC Resolution – Arts. 41 and 42 international law. The Court sees no reason to
Art. 41 – “The SC may decide what measures not deny that, in customary law, the prohibition of
involving the use of armed force are to be armed attacks may apply to the sending by a
employed to give effect to its decisions, and it State of armed bands to the territory of another
may call upon the Members of the UN to apply State, if such an operation, because of its scale
such measures. These may include complete or and effects, would have been classified as an
partial interruption of economic relations and of armed attack rather than as a mere frontier
rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other incident had it been carried out by regular armed
means of communication, and the severance of forces. But the Court does not believe that the
diplomatic relations.” concept of 'armed attack' includes not only acts by
armed bands where such acts occur on a
Art. 42 – “Should the SC consider that measures significant scale but also assistance to rebels in
provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or the form of the provision of weapons or logistical
have proved to be inadequate, it may take such or other support. Such assistance may be regarded
action by air, sea, or land forces as may be as a threat or use of force, or amount to
necessary to maintain or restore international intervention in the internal or external affairs of
peace and security. Such action may include other States.”

Q: Distinguish briefly but clearly between the

RECOGNITION constitutive theory and the declaratory theory Notes:
3 LEVELS concerning recognition of states. (2004 Bar)
A. Recognition of State A: The constitutive theory is the minority view
B. Recognition of Government which holds that recognition is the last element
C. Recognition of Belligerency that converts or constitutes the entity being
recognized into an international person; while the
RECOGNITION OF STATE declaratory theory is the majority view that
2 Schools of Thought recognition affirms the pre-existing fact that the
Constitutive School entity being recognized already possesses the
- recognition is the act which gives to a status of an international person. In the former
political entity international status as a recognition is regarded as mandatory and legal
State; and may be demanded as a matter of right by any
- it is only through recognition that a State entity that can establish its possession of the four
becomes an International Person and a essential elements of a state; while the latter
subject of international law recognition is highly political and discretionary.
- thus, recognition is a legal matter—not a
matter of arbitrary will on the part of
one State whether to recognize or refuse
to recognize another entity but that
where certain conditions of fact exist, an
entity may demand, and the State is RECOGNITION OF GOVERNMENT
under legal duty to accord recognition
Recognition of Recognition of
Declaratory School Government State
- recognition merely an act that declares As to Scope Does not Includes
as a fact something that has hitherto necessarily recognition or
been uncertain signify that government –
- it simply manifests the recognizing recognition of a government an
State’s readiness to accept the normal State – to essential
consequences of the fact of Statehood government may element of a
not be State
- recognition is a political act, i.e., it is independent
entirely a matter of policy and discretion
As to Revocable Generally,
to give or refuse recognition, and that no
Revocabilit irrevocable
entity possesses the power, as a matter
of legal right, to demand recognition
- there is no legal right to demand Q: Distinguish recognition of State from
recognition recognition of Government. (1975 Bar)
- followed by most nations A: (1) Recognition of state carries with it the
recognition of government since the former
★ recognition of a State has now been implies that a state recognized has all the
substituted to a large extent by the act essential requisites of a state at he time
of admission to the United Nations recognition is extended.
★ it is the “assurance given to a new State
that it will be permitted to hold its place (2) Once recognition of state is accorded, it is
and rank in the character of an generally irrevocable. Recognition of
independent political organism in the government, on the other hand, may be withheld
society of nations” from a succeeding government brought about by
violent or unconstitutional means.

Criteria for Recognition

Q: Explain, using example, the Declaratory
Theory of Recognition Principle. (1991 Bar) 1. Objective
A: The declaratory theory of recognition is a Test –
theory according to which recognition of a state is ★ government
merely an acknowledgment of the fact of its should be EFFECTIVE and STABLE
existence. In other words, the recognized state ★ government is
already exists and can exist even without such in possession of State machinery
recognition. For example, when other countries ★ there is little
recognize Bangladesh, Bangladesh already existed resistance to its authority
as a state even without such recognition.
2. Subjective Test –

★ the government is willing and Effect on recognized vest such

able to discharge its international Properties government in title Notes:
obligations Abroad properties abroad
★ 2 Doctrines
Recognition De Jure
Tobar or Wilson Doctrine ★ Given to a government that satisfies both
☀ suggested by Foreign Minister the objective and subjective criteria
Tobar (Ecuador); reiterated by President
Woodrow Wilson (US) Recognition De Facto
☀ recognition is withheld from ★ Given to governments that have not fully
governments established by revolutionary satisfied objective and subjective criteria
means – revolution, civil war, coup ★ EX.: While wielding effective power, it
d’etat, other forms of internal violence, might have not yet acquired sufficient
UNTIL, freely elected representatives of stability
the people have organized a
constitutional government Consequences of Recognition of Government
1. The recognized government or State
Estrada Doctrine acquires the capacity to enter into
☀ a reaction to diplomatic relations with recognizing States
the Tobar/Wilson Doctrine; formulated and to make treaties with them
by Mexican Foreign Minister Genaro 2. The recognized government or State
Estrada acquires the right of suing in the courts of
☀ disclaims right law of the recognizing State
of foreign states to rule upon legitimacy
of a government of a foreign State 3. It is immune from the jurisdiction of the
☀ a policy of courts of law of recognizing State
never issuing any declaration giving 4. It becomes entitled to demand and
recognition to governments – instead, it receive possession of property situated within
simply accepts whatever government is the jurisdiction of a recognizing State, which
in effective control without raising the formerly belonged to the preceding
issue of recognition government at the time of its supercession
5. Its effect is to preclude the courts of
Q: Distinguish briefly but clearly between the recognizing State from assign judgment on
Wilson doctrine and the Estrada doctrine the legality of its acts, past and future.
regarding recognition of governments. (2004 Recognition being retroactive.
A: In the Wilson or Tobar doctrine, a government  Thus, Act of State Doctrine now applies
established by means revolution, civil war, coup
d’ etat or other forms of internal violence will not Q: Who has the authority to recognize?
be recognized until the freely elected A: It is a matter to be determined according to
representatives of the people have organized a the municipal law of each State. In the
constitutional government, while in the Estrada Philippines, there is no explicit provision in the
doctrine any diplomatic representatives in a Constitution which vests this power in any
country where an upheaval has taken place will department. But since under the Constitution,
deal or not deal with whatever government is in the President is empowered to appoint and
control therein at the time and either action shall receive ambassadors and public ministers, it is
not be taken as a judgment on the legitimacy of conceded that by implication, it is the Executive
the said government. Department that is primarily endowed with the
Kinds of Recognition power to recognize foreign governments and
Recognition De Jure Recognition States. [Art. VII, 1987 Constitution]
De Facto
As to Relatively Provisional, The legality and wisdom of recognition accorded
Duration permanent any foreign entity is not subject to judicial
As to Brings about full Limited to review. The courts are bound by the acts of
Effect on diplomatic certain political department of the government. The
Diplomatic relations/intercours juridical action of the Executive in recognizing or refusing
Relations e relations; to recognize a foreign State or government is
for instance, properly within the scope of judicial notice.
it does not
bring about Q: Is the recognition extended by the President
diplomatic to a foreign government subject to judicial
immunities review?
As to Vests title to Does not A: NO! It is purely a political question.

a mere initial stage of more serious and

Marcos v. Manglapus war. It involves a rebel widespread and Notes:
[GR 88211 15 Sept. 1989] movement, and is presupposes the
usually not recognized existence of war
between 2 or more
The Constitution limits resort to the political
states (1st sense) or
question doctrine and broadens the scope of
actual civil war within
judicial inquiry…But nonetheless there remain
a single state (2nd
issues beyond the Court’s jurisdiction the
determination of which is exclusively for the
President…We cannot, for example, question the
President’s recognition of a foreign government, sanctions are governed governed by the rules
no matter how premature or improvident such by municipal law – on international law as
action may appear...” Revised Penal Code, the belligerents may
i.e. rebellion be given international
ICMC vs. Calleja
[GR 85750, 28 Sept. 1990]

A categorical recognition by the Executive Branch

Note: Abu Sayaff is not a rebel group it is a mere
that ICMC enjoy immunities…is a political question
bandit group.
conclusive upon the Courts in order not to
embarrass a political department of Government.
Requisites of Belligerency [COWS]
BELLIGERENCY 1. an organized civil government
2 Senses of Belligerency that has control and direction over the armed
1. State of War between 2 or more struggle launched by the rebels;
States ★ a “provisional government”
☀ Belligeren
cy 2. occupation of a substantial
☀ the States portion of the state’s territory;
at war are called “Belligerent States” ★ more or less permanent
2. Actual Hostilities amounting to ★ legitimate government must use
Civil War within a State superior military force to dislodge the
☀ Insurgency rebels
☀ there is
just 1 State
☀ presuppos 3. seriousness of the struggle,
es the existence of a rebel movement which must be so widespread thereby leaving
no doubt as to the outcome; and
Developments in a Rebel Movement ★ must be so widespread, leaving
Stage of Insurgency no doubt as to the outcome
★ Earlier/nascent/less-developed stage of ★ Q: Has the CPP/NPA and MILF
rebellion complied with these conditions?
★ There is not much international A: NO! BUT, there are some indications
complication they are striving to meet the conditions.
★ Matter of municipal law They executed common criminals, after a
★ EX.: Captured rebels are prosecuted for trial. It is like saying they have a
rebellion government

Stage of Belligerency Note: The maintenance of peace and order, and

★ A higher stage, as the stage of administration of justice, are constituent
insurgency becomes widespread functions of the government
★ Already a matter of
international law, not of municipal law ★ Camp Abu-Bakr—MILF almost
★ EX.: Captures rebels – must be had control of a substantial portion of
treated like prisoners of war; considered as territory
combatants; hence, cannot be executed ★ government had to use all its
military might and divert its budget
Insurgency Belligerency ★ CPP/NPA sends message that
they are observing the Laws of War
★ Captured soliders are announced
as POWs; had Red Cross representatives

4. willingness on the part of the EX.; Proclamation by the legitimate

rebels to observe the rules and customs of government of a blockade of ports held by Notes:
war. the rebels

Q: Explain, using example, recognition of ★ Done by Lincoln during

belligerency. (1991 Bar) the American Civil War
A: Recognition of belligerency is the formal ★ Q: What about peace
acknowledgment by a third party of the existence talks?
of a state of war between the central government A: NOT implied recognition. But,
and a portion of that state. Belligerency exists circumstances may be such as to become
when a sizable portion of the territory of a state an implied recognition
is under the effective control of an insurgent EX.: Holding peach talks in a foreign
community which is seeking to establish a country. Rebels call the foreign country
separate government and the insurgents are in de a “neutral state”. If a mere insurgency,
facto control of a portion of the territory and it is a purely internal matter – no need
population, have a political organization, and are for talks abroad
able to maintain such control and conduct
themselves according to the laws of war. For
example, Great Britain recognized a state of TERRITORY OF STATES
belligerency in the United States during the Civil Territory Defined
War. Characteristics of Territory
Modes of Acquisition of Territory
Consequences of Recognition of Belligerents (1) Dereliction/Abandonment
1. Before recognition as such, it is (2) Cession
the legitimate government that is responsible (3) Conquest/Subjugation
for the acts of the rebels affecting foreign (4) Prescription
nationals and their properties. Rebel (5) Erosion
government is responsible for the acts of the (6) Revolution
rebels affecting foreign nationals and (7) Natural Causes
2. Laws and customs of war in (1) Territorial Domain
conducting the hostilities must be observed; (2) Maritime and Fluvial Domain
★ EX.: cannot execute a. Territorial Sea
captured rebels, considered as POWs b. Contiguous Zone
3. From the point of view of 3rd c. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
States, the effect of recognition of d. Continental Shelf
belligerency is to put them under obligation e. High Seas
to observe strict neutrality and abide by the (3) Aerial Domain
consequences arising from that position. a. Air Space
★ must observe Laws of Neutrality b. Outer Space
★ EX.: b.
1. must abstain from taking part in Territory
the hostilities; - the fixed and permanent portion on the
2. most acquiesce to restrictions earth’s surface inhabited by the people
imposed by the rebels, such as visit of the state and over which it has
and search of its merchant ships supreme authority
4. Rebels are enemy combatants - consists of the portion of the surface of
and accorded the rights of prisoners of war. the globe on which that State settles and
and over which it has supreme authority
★ essentially, this means - an exercise of sovereignty, covering not
that there are 2 competing governments only land, but also the atmosphere as
in 1 country well
5. On the side of the rebels, the CHARACTERISTICS OF TERRITORY
recognition of belligerency puts them under 1. Permanent
responsibility to 3rd States and to the 2. Definite/Indicated with Precision
legitimate government for all their acts which ★ Generally, the territory’s limits define
do not conform to the laws and customs of the State’s jurisdiction
war. 3. Big enough to sustain the population
4. Not so extensive as to be difficult to:
FORMS OF RECOGNITION (1) Administer; and
1. Express (2) Defend from external
2. Implied aggression

Modes of Acquisition of Territory ☀ Q: How is this

(1) By Original Title done and effected? Notes:
a. Discovery and Occupation A: Possession must be claimed on
b. Accretion behalf of the State represented by
c. “Sector Principle” the discoverer. It may then be
(2) By Derivative Title effected through a formal
a. Prescription proclamation and the symbolic act of
b. Cession raising the state’s national flag.
c. Conquest/Subjugation
2. Effective Occupation
Other Modes ☀ Does not
(a) Dereliction/Abando necessarily require continuous
nment display of authority in every part of
(b) Erosion the territory claimed
(c) Revolution ☀ Authority must
(d) Natural Causes be exercised as and when occasion
Discovery and Occupation ☀ Thus, when
★ An original mode of acquisition of the territory is thinly populated and
territory belonging to no one – “terra nullius” uninhabited, very little actual
exercise of sovereign rights is
★ land to be acquired must be terra nullius needed in the absence of
★ Q: Today, few, if any places are terra
nullius. Why is this mode then important? Doctrine of Effective Occupation
A: Past occupations are source of modern ☀ discovery
boundary disputes alone gives only an inchoate title; it
★ Q: When is a territory “terra must be followed within a
nullius?” reasonable time by effective
A: Under the Old Concept a territory is not occupation
necessarily uninhabited! A territory is terra ☀ effective
nullius, if, even if occupied, the people occupation does not necessarily
occupying it has a civilization that falls below require continuous display of
the European standard. This was the authority in every part of the
justification for the Spanish colonization of territory claimed
the Philippines, and the European ☀ an occupation
colonization of Africa. However, this old made is valid only with respect to
concept is no longer valid under and extends only to the area
contemporary international law! effectively occupied.
★ 2 REQUISITES ☀ under the
(1) Discovery/ “Principle of Effective
Possession Occupation,” the following
☀ Mere discovery gives only an doctrines/principles are no longer
Inchoate Right of Discovery applicable today:
☀ Q: What is the effect of this
right? a) Hinterland Doctrine
A: It bars other states, within a Occupation of coasts results to claim
reasonable time, from entering the on the unexplored interior
territory, so that the discovering
state may establish a settlement b) Right of Contiguity
therein an commence administration Effective occupation of a territory
and occupation. Once the makes the possessor’s sovereignty
discovering state begins exercising extend over neighboring territories
sovereign rights over the territory, as far as is necessary for the
the inchoate right ripens and is integrity, security and defense of
perfected into a full title the land actually occupied

☀ Q: What if the Prescription

discovering state fails to exercise ★ acquisition of territory by an
sovereign rights? averse holding continued through a long term
A: The inchoate title is extinguished, of years
and the territory becomes terra ★ derivative mode of acquisition
nullius again. by which territory belonging to 1 State is
transferred to the sovereignty of another

State by reason of the adverse and of war and thereafter annexed to and placed
uninterrupted possession thereof by the latter under the sovereignty of the conquering State Notes:
for a sufficiently long period of time ★ the taking possession of hostile territory
★ 2 REQUISITES through military force in time of war and by
a) continuous and undisturbed possession which the victorious belligerent compels the
☀ Q: What if there are enemy to surrender sovereignty of that
claims or protests to the State’s territory thus occupied
possession? ★ acquisition of territory by force of arms
A: NOT undisturbed! ★ however, conquest alone merely gives an
inchoate right; acquisition must be completed
b) lapse of a period of time by formal act of annexation
☀ No rule as to length of time ★ no longer regarded as lawful
required ★ UN Charter prohibits resort to threat or use of
☀ Question of fact force against a State’s territorial integrity or
political independence
★ Q: What is the source of this
right? Conquest is Different from “Military or
A: Roman principle of “usucapio” (long Belligerent Occupation”
continued use of real property ripened into ☀ Act whereby a military commander in the
ownership) course of war gains effective possession
of an enemy territory
Cession ☀ By itself, does not effect an acquisition
★ a derivative mode of acquisition of territory
by which territory belonging to 1 State is
transferred to the sovereignty of another Accretion
State in accordance with an agreement ★ the increase in the land area of a State
between them caused by the operation of the forces of
★ a bilateral agreement whereby nature, or artificially, through human labor
one State transfers sovereignty over a ★ Accessio cedat principali (accessory follows
definite portion of territory to another State the principal) is the rule which, in general,
E.g. Treaty of cession (maybe an outcome of governs all the forms of accretion.
peaceful negotiations [voluntary] or the ★ EX.: (1) Reclamation projects in Manila Bay
result of war[forced]) (2) Polders of the Netherlands
★ 2 KINDS:
- comprises the entirety of 1 State’s TERRITORIAL DOMAIN
domain ★ The landmass where the
- the ceding State is absorbed by the people live
acquiring State and ceases to exist
- EX.: Cession of Korea to Japan under the Internal Waters
22 Aug. 1910 Treaty ★ These are bodies of water
within the land boundaries of a State, or are
2. Partial Cession closely linked to its land domain, such that
- comprises only a fractional portion of the they are considered as legally equivalent to
ceding State’s territory national land
- cession of the Philippine Islands by Spain ★ includes: rivers, lakes and
to the US in the Treaty of Paris of 10 land-locked seas, canals, and polar regions.
Dec. 1988
- Forms: Rivers
a) Treaty of Sale ☀ Kinds of Rivers
EX.: (1) Sale by Russia of Alaska to (1) National Rivers
(2) Sale by Spain of Caroline  Lie wholly within 1
Islands to Germany State’s territorial domain – from
b) Free Gifts source to mouth
EX: (1) Cession of a portion of the
 Belongs exclusively to
Horse-Shoe Reef in Lake
that State
 EX.: Pasig River
by UK to US
(2) Boundary Rivers
★ derivative mode of acquisition whereby the  Separates 2 Different States
territory of 1 State is conquered in the course  Belongs to both States:

 If river is navigable – the ☀ Waters considered internal only because of

boundary line is the middle of existence of a historic title, otherwise, should Notes:
the navigable channel “thalweg” not have that charater
 If the river is not navigable ☀ EX.: Bay of Cancale in France
– the boundary line is the
 EX.: St. Lawrence River between US Zones of the Sea
and Canada - Waters adjacent to the coasts of a State to a
specified limit
(3) Multinational Rivers
 Runs through several States 1. Territorial Sea
 Forms part of the territory of the ★ comprises in the marginal belt adjacent
States through which it passes to the land area or the coast and
 EX.: Congo River, Mekong River includes generally the bays, gulfs and
(4) International Rivers straights which do not have the character
 navigable from the open sea, and of historic waters (waters that are
which separate or pass through legally part of the internal waters of the
several States between their sources State)
and mouths ★ portion of the open sea adjacent to the
 In peacetime, freedom of navigation State’s shores, over which that State
is allowed or recognized by exercises jurisdictional control
conventional international law ★ Basis – necessity of self-defense
★ Effect – territorial supremacy over the
Lakes and Land-locked Seas territorial sea, exclusive enjoyment of
☀ If entirely enclosed by fishing rights and other coastal rights
territory of 1 state: Part of that State’s ★ BUT: Subject to the RIGHT OF INNOCENT
territory PASSAGE (a foreign State may exercise its
☀ If surrounded by territories right of innocent passage)
of several States: Part of the surrounding ★ Q: When is passage innocent?
States A: When it is not prejudicial to the
Canals peace, good order, or security of the
☀ Artificially constructed waterways coastal State
☀ GR: Belongs to the State’s territory
☀ XPN: Important Inter-Oceanic Canals Right of Innocent Passage
The right of continuous and expeditious navigation
governed by Special Regime
of a foreign shop through a State’s territorial sea
(1) Suez Canal
for the purpose of traversing that sea without
(2) Panama Canal
entering the internal waters or calling at a
Historic Waters
roadstead or port facility outside the internal
waters, or proceeding to or from internal waters
or a call at such roadstead or port facility

Q: Explain Innocent Passage. (1991 Bar)

A: Innocent passage means the right of continuous
and expeditious navigation of a foreign ship
through the territorial sea of a State for the
purpose of traversing that sea without entering
the internal waters or calling at a roadstead or
port facility outside internal water or proceeding
to or from internal waters or a call at such
roadstead or port facility. The passage is
innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the
peace, good order or security of the coastal State.

Extent and Limitations of Right of Innocent

☀ Extends to ALL ships – merchant and warships
☀ Submarines must navigate on the surface and
show their flag
☀ Nuclear-powered ships, ships carrying nuclear
and dangerous substances must carry
documents and observe special safety

A: When the coastline is deeply

Q: En route to the tuna fishing grounds in the indented, or when there is a fringe of Notes:
Pacific Ocean, a vessel registered in Country TW islands along the coast in its immediate
entered the Balintang Channel north of Babuyan vicinity.
Island and with special hooks and nets dragged
up red corrals found near Batanes. By Distinguish briefly but clearly between the
International Convention certain corals are territorial sea and the internal waters of the
protected species. Just before the vessel Philippines. (2004 Bar)
reached the high seas, the Coast Guard patrol Territorial water is defined by historic right or
intercepted the vessel and seized its cargo treaty limits while internal water is defined by
including tuna. The master of the vessel and the the archipelago doctrine. The territorial waters,
owner of the cargo protested, claiming the as defined in the Convention on the Law of the
rights of transit passage and innocent passage, Sea, has a uniform breadth of 12 miles measured
and sought recovery of the cargo and the from the lower water mark of the coast; while the
release of the ship. Is the claim meritorious or outermost points of our archipelago which are
not? Reason briefly. (2004 Bar) connected with baselines and all waters
A: The claim of the master of the vessel and the comprised therein are regarded as internal
owner of the cargo is not meritorious. Although waters.
their claim of transit passage and innocent
passage through the Balintang Channel is tenable 2. Contiguous Zone
under the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, ★ zone adjacent to the territorial sea, over
the fact that they attached special hooks and nets which the coastal State may exercise such
to their vessel which dragged up red corrals is control as is necessary to:
reprehensible. The Balintang Channel is  Prevent infringement of its customs,
considered part of our internal waters and thus is fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws
within the absolute jurisdiction of the Philippine within its territory or territorial sea;
government. Being so, no foreign vessel,
 Punish such infringement
merchant or otherwise, could exploit or explore
☀ extends to a maximum of 24 nautical
any of our natural resources in any manner of
miles from the baseline from which the
doing so without the consent of our government.
territorial sea is measured.
Q: What is the extent of the territorial sea?
3. Exclusive Economic Zone
A: 1. Formerly, 3 nautical miles from the low
water mark based on the theory that this is all ☀ a maximum zone of 200 nautical
that a State could defend. This has been miles from the baseline from which the
practically abandoned. territorial sea is measured, over which, the
coastal State exercises sovereign rights over
2. 1982 Convention of the Law of the Sea provides all the economic resources of the sea, sea-
the maximum limit of 12 nautical miles from the bed and subsoil
Rights of other States in the EEZ
Q: What is the baseline? (a) Freedom of navigation and overflight
A: Depends on the method: (b) Freedom to lay submarine cables and
1. Normal Baseline Method pipelines
☀ Territorial sea is drawn from the low- (c) Freedom to engage in other internationally
water mark. lawful uses of the sea related to said
☀ Q: What is the low-water mark? functions
A: The line on the shore reached by the
sea at low tide. Otherwise known as the Rights of Land-locked States
“baseline.” Right to participate, on an equitable basis, in the
exploitation of an appropriate part of the surplus
2. Straight Baseline Method of the living resources of the EEZ of the coastal
☀ A straight line is drawn across States of the same sub-region or region
the sea, from headland to headland, or
from island to island. That straight line Distinguish briefly but clearly between the
then becomes the baseline from which contiguous zone and exclusive economic zone.
the territorial sea is measured. (2004 Bar)
☀ Q: What happens to the waters The contiguous zone is the area which is known as
inside the line? the protective jurisdiction and starts from 12th
A: Considered internal waters. However, nautical mile from low water mark (baseline),
the baseline must not depart to any while the EEZ is the area which ends at the 200th
appreciable extent from the general nautical mile from the baseline. In the latter, no
direction of the coast state really has exclusive ownership of it but the
☀ Q: When is this used? state which has a valid claim on it according to

the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas Archipelagic Doctrine

agreement has the right to explore and exploit its  2 Kinds of Archipelagos: Notes:
natural resources; while in the former the coastal 1. Coastal Archipelago
state may exercise the control necessary to a) ☀ situated close to a mainland, and
prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal may be considered part of such
immigration or sanitary regulations within its mainland
territory b) punish infringement of the above
regulations within its territory or territorial sea. 2. Mid-Ocean Archipelago
☀ groups of islands situated in the
Q: Enumerate the rights of the coastal state in ocean at such distance from the
the exclusive economic zone. (2005, 2000 Bar) coasts of firm land (mainland)
A: The following are the rights of the coastal ☀ EX.: Philippines
state in the exclusive economic zone:  emphasizes the unity of land
1. sovereign rights for the and waters by defining an archipelago
purpose of exploring and exploiting, either as:
conserving and managing the living and non-  A group of island surrounded by
living resources in the superjacent waters of waters; or
the sea-bed and the resources of the sea-bed  A body of water studded with islands
and subsoil;  thus, baselines are drawn by
2. sovereign rights with connecting the appropriate points of the
respect to the other activities for the outermost islands to encircle the islands
economic exploitation and exploration of the within the archipelago.
zone or EEZ, such as production of energy
from water, currents and winds; Rules Governing the Baselines
3. jurisdictional right with (a) Such baselines should not depart radically
respect to establishment and use of artificial from the general direction of the coast, or
islands; from the general configuration of the
4. jurisdictional right as to archipelago
protection and preservation of the marine (b) Within the baselines are included the main
environment; and islands an area with a maximum water area
5. jurisdictional right over to land area ratio of 9:1
marine scientific research (c) Length of baselines shall not exceed 1—
6. other rights and duties nautical miles
provided for in the Law of the Sea
 XPN: Up to 3% of the total number of
Convention. (Article 56, Law of the Sea
baselines may have a maximum length of
125 nautical miles
These treaty provisions form part of the Philippine
Effect of the Baselines
Law, the Philippines being a signatory to the
(a) The waters inside the baselines are
considered internal waters;
(b) The territorial sea, etc. are measured from
4. Continental Shelf
such baselines;
Q: Explain the meaning of continental shelf.
(c) Archipelagic State exercises sovereign rights
(1991 Bar)
over all the waters enclosed by the baselines
A: The continental shelf comprises the seabed and
subsoil of the submarine areas that extend beyond
Limitation – Archipelagic Sealanes
the territorial sea throughout the natural
☀ Archipelagic State must designate
prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge
sea lands an air route for the continuous and
of the continental margin; or to a distance of
expeditious passage of foreign ships and
more than 200 nautical miles from the baselines
aircraft through or over its archipelagic
form which the breadth of the territorial sea is
waters and adjacent territorial sea
measured where the outer edge of the continental
shelf does not extend up to that distance.  Passage only for continuous,
expeditious, and unobstructed
Rights of the Coastal State transit between 1 part of the high
☀ sovereign rights for the purpose of seas or an EEX to another part of the
exploring and exploiting its natural high seas or an EEZ
resources  Q: What if none are designated?
A: Right of archipelagic sealane
☀ rights are exclusive – if the State passage may still be exercised
does not explore or exploit the through the routes normally used for
continental shelf, no one may do so international navigation
without its express consent

 The Philippines adheres to the a. Internal Waters;

Archipelagic Doctrine – Art. I, 1987 b. Territorial Sea; or Notes:
Constitution: c. Contiguous Zone
“The waters around, between, and 2. May be continued outside such waters if the
connecting the islands of the pursuit has not been interrupted
archipelago, regardless of their breadth 3. Continuous and unabated
and dimensions, form part of the internal 4. Ceases as soon as the foreign ship enters the
waters of the Philippines.” territorial sea of:
a. Its own State; or
 Also embodied in the 1982 Convention of b. That of a 3rd State
the Law of the Sea, Art. 47 5. Be undertaken by:
 UNCLOS became effective on 16 Nov. a. Warships; or
1994, after its ratification by more than b. Military aircraft; or
the required 60 of the signatory States c. Other ships/aircraft cleared and
identifiable as being in the government
Q: What do you understand by the archipelagic service and authorized to that effect
doctrine? Is this reflected in the 1987 ☀ Also applies to
Constitution? (1989, 1979, 1975 Bar) violations of laws and regulations of the
A: The archipelagic doctrine emphasizes the unity coastal State applicable to the EEZ and to the
of land and waters by defining an archipelago continental shelf.
either as a group of islands surrounded by waters
or a body of water with studded with islands. For Deep Sea Bed
this purpose, it requires that baselines be drawn ☀ The sea-bed beyond the continental shelf
by connecting the appropriate points of the ☀ Under the UNCLOS – resources of the deep
outermost islands to encircle the islands within sea-bed are reserved as the “common
the archipelago. The waters on the landward side heritage of mankind”
of the baselines regardless of breadth, or
dimensions are merely internal waters. Q: In the Pacific Ocean, while on its way to
Northern Samar to load copra, a Norweigian
Article I, Sec. 1 of the Constitution provides that freighter collides with Philippine Luxury Liner
the national territory of the Philippines includes resulting in the death of ten (10) Filipino
the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands passengers. Upon the Norweigian vessel’s
and waters embraced therein; and the waters arrival in Catarman, Northern Samar, the
around, between, and connecting the islands of Norweigian captain and the helmsman assisting
the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and were arrested and charged with multiple
dimensions form part of the internal waters of the homicide through reckless imprudence. Apart
Philippines. from filing a protest with the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, the Norweigian Embassy, through a local
5. The regime of the High Seas counsel helps the accused in filing a motion to
quash. It is pointed out that the incident
★ belongs to everyone and to no one – both res
happened on the high seas, the accused were
commones and res nullius
on board a Norweigian vessel and only a
★ everyone may enjoy the following rights over
Norweigian court can try the case even if the
the high seas:
death occurred on a Philippine ship. Resolve
(a) Navigation
the motion stating the reason for your decision.
(b) Fishing
(1986 Bar)
(c) Scientific research
A: The motion to quash should be sustained. In
(d) Mining
the Lotus case [PCIJ Pub 198i2 Series A No 10
(e) Laying of submarine p.25], a French mail steamer, Lotus, collided with
cables or pipelines; and a Turkish collier, Boz Kourt. As a result, eight (8)
(f) other human activities in Turkish subjects died. The collision took place in
the open sea and the ocean floor the Aegean Sea, outside of Turkish territorial
★ the freedoms waters. The Lotus proceeded to Constantinople
extend to the air space above the high seas where its officers were tried and convicted for
manslaughter. The French government protested
Doctrine of Hot Pursuit on the ground that Turkey had no jurisdiction over
☀ The pursuit of a foreign vessel an act committed on the high seas by foreigners
undertaken by the coastal State which has on board foreign vessels whose flag state has
“good reason to believe that the ship has exclusive jurisdiction as regards such acts. The
violated the laws and regulations of that dispute was referred by agreement to the
State.” Permanent Court of International Justice which
☀ The pursuit must: held in a split decision that Turkey had “not acted
1. Be commenced when the ship is within the in conflict with the principles of International
pursuing State’s: Law,” because the act committed produced

affects on board the Boz Kourt under Turkish flag,

and thus on Turkish territory. The principle that 1. Air Space Notes:
vessels on the high seas are subject to no ★ the air space above
authority except that the flag State whose flag the State’s terrestrial and maritime territory
they fly was thus affirmed. ★ “…Every State has
complete and exclusive sovereignty over the
NOTE: Justice Jorge Coquia, in his book however, air space above its territory”
opined that the ruling in the Lotus case is no ★ Convention on
longer controlling in view of Art. 97 of the UN International Civil Aviation –“Territory” –
Convention on the Law of the Sea which provides includes terrestrial and maritime territory
that in the event of collision or any other incident ★ thus, includes air
of navigation concerning a ship on the high seas, space above territorial sea
involving the penal or disciplinary responsibility of ★ NOTE: NO right of
the master or any other person in the service of innocent passage!
the ship, the penal or disciplinary proceedings ★ the air space above
may be instituted only before State of which such the high seas is open to all aircraft, just as
person is a national. For this purpose, no arrest the high seas is accessible to ships of all
or detention of the ship, even as a measure of States
navigation shall be ordered by the authorities - the State whose aerial space is violated
other than those of the flag state. can take measures to protect itself, but
it does not mean that States have an
Freedom of Navigation unlimited right to attack the intruding
the right to sail ships on the seas which is open to aircraft (intruding aircraft can be
all States and land-locked countries ordered either to leave the State’s air
space or to land)
General Rule: vessels sailing on the high seas are
subject only to international law and the laws of Q: What are the 5 air freedoms?
the flag state A:
(a) overflight without landing;
Exceptions: a) foreign merchant ships (b) landing for non-traffic purposes;
violating the laws of the coastal State; b) (c) put down traffic from state to
pirate ships; c) slave trade ships; d) any ship airline;
engaged in unauthorized broadcasting; and e) (d) embark traffic destined for state
ships without nationality, or flying a false flag of aircraft; and
or refusing to show its flag. (e) embark traffic or put down
traffic to or from a third state
Flag State
the State whose nationality (ship’s registration)
the ship possesses, for it is nationality which gives 2. Outer Space (res
the right to fly a country’s flag commones)
★ the space beyond
Flags of Convenience – the airspace surrounding the earth or beyond
registration of any ship in return for a payment the national airspace, which is completely
fee beyond the sovereignty of any State
★ the moon and the
Q: Distinguish briefly but clearly between the other celestial bodies form part of the outer
flag state and the flag of convenience. (2004 space (Moon Treaty of 1979)
Bar) ★ thus, it is not
A: Flag state means a ship has the nationality of subject to national appropriation
the flag state it flies, but there must be a genuine ★ free for all
link between the state and the ship. (Article 91 of exploration and use by all States and cannot
the Convention of the Law of the Sea.) Flag of be annexed by any State
convenience refers to a state with which a vessel ★ governed by a
is registered for various reasons such as low or
regime similar to that of the high seas
non-existent taxation or low operating costs
although the ship has no genuine link with that
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of
state. (Harris, Cases and Materilas on
States in the Exploration and Use of Outer
International Law, 5th ed., 1998, p. 425.)
Space (Outer Space Treaty)
☀ Outer Space is free for exploration and use by
★ the airspace above the
☀ Cannot be annexed by any State
territorial and maritime domains of the State,
☀ Its use and exploration must be carried out
to the limits of the atmosphere
for the benefit of all countries and in
★ does not include the outer space
accordance with international law

☀ Celestial bodies shall be used exclusively for covers astronauts and cosmonauts. This matter is
peaceful purposes covered by the Registration of Objects in Space Notes:
☀ Nuclear weapons and weapons of mass Convention of 1974 and the Liability for Damage
destruction shall not be placed in orbit Caused by Spaced Objects Convention of 1972.
around the earth
Q: May the USA lay exclusive claim over the
Q: What is the boundary between the air space moon, having explored it and having planted
and the outer space? her flag therein to the exclusion of other states?
A: No accepted answer yet! There are different Explain. (1979 Bar)
opinions: A: No, because the outer space and celestial
1. That it should be near the lowest altitude bodies found therein including the moon are not
(perigee) at which artificial earth satellites susceptible to the national appropriation but
can remain in orbit without being destroyed legally regarded as res communes.
by friction with the air around 190 km from
earth’s surface

2. Theoretical limit of air flights is 90 km

above the earth

3. Functional Approach
 The legal regime governing space
activities are based, not on a boundary
line, but on the nature of the activities

Q: What is outer space? Who or which can THE UNITED NATIONS

exercise jurisdiction over astronauts while in
outer space? (2003 Bar) The United Nations
A: There are several schools of thought regarding Formation of the United Nations
the determination of outer space, such as the Purpose of United Nations
limit of air flight, the height of atmospheric Principles of United Nations
space, infinity, the lowest altitude of an artificial Membership
satellite, and an altitude approximating Principal Organs
aerodynamic lift. Another school of thought Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations
proceeds by analogy to the law of the sea. It
proposes that a State should exercise full ¯°º°¯
sovereignty up to the height to which an aircraft
can ascend. Non-militant flight instrumentalities THE UNITED NATIONS
should be allowed over a second area, a It is an international organization created at the
contiguous zone of 300 miles. Over that should be San Francisco Conference which was held in the
outer space. The boundary between airspace and United States from April 25 to June 26, 1945. The
outer space has not yet been defined. (Harris, U.N., as it is commonly called, succeeded the
Cases and Materials on International Law, 5th Ed., League of Nations and is governed by a Charter
pp. 251-253) Under Article 8 of the Treaty on the which came into force on October 24, 1945.
Principles Governing the Activities of States in the composed originally of only 51 members, the UN
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the has grown rapidly to include most of the states in
Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, a State on the world.
whose registry an object launched into outer
space retains jurisdiction over the astronauts Who was the advocate of forming the UN?
while they are in outer space. In his famous Fourteen Points for the peace
settlement, Woodrow Wilson called for the
Alternative A: Outer space is the space beyond establishment of a “general association of nations
the airspace surrounding the Earth or beyond the for world peace under specific covenants for
national airspace. In law, the boundary between mutual guarantees of political independence and
outer space and airspace has remained territorial integrity to large and small States
undetermined. But in theory, this has been alike.” And so, the League of Nations was
estimated to be between 80 to 90 kilometers. formed.
Outer space in this estimate begins from the
lowest altitude an artificial satellite can remain in Who coined the name UN?
orbit. Under the Moon Treaty of 1979, the moon It was President Roosevelt who suggested early in
and the other celestial bodies form part of outer 1942 the name UN for the group of countries
space. which were fighting the Axis powers.

In outer space, the space satellites or objects are What are the principal purposes of the UN?
under the jurisdiction of States of registry which 1. To maintain international peace and security

2. To develop friendly relations among nations The Charter is silent regarding withdrawal of
3. To achieve international cooperation in membership. In 1985, Indonesia withdrew its Notes:
solving international economic, social, membership from the UN and it was not
cultural and humanitarian problems compelled to remain. Subsequently, upon
4. To promote respect for human rights President Sukarno’s overthrow, Indonesia resumed
5. To be a center of harmonizing the actions of its membership, which was accepted by the UN.
nations towards those common goals.
The Principal Organs
What are the principles of the UN? 1. General Assembly (GA)
1. All its members are equal and all are 2. Security Council (SC)
committed to fulfill in good faith their 3. Economic and Social Council (ESC)
obligations under the Charter 4. Trusteeship Council (TC)
2. To settle their disputes with each other by 5. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
peaceful means 6. Secretariat
3. To refrain form the threat or use of force in
their international relations Subsidiary Organs – those which was created by
4. To refrain from assisting any State against the Charter itself or which it allows to be created
which the UN is taking preventive or whenever necessary by the SC or GA.
enforcement action. 1. Little Assembly – Interim Committee, created
in 1947 for a term of one eyar and re-
2 Kinds of Membership established in 1949 for an indefinite term.
a. Original Composed of one delegate for each member-
b. Elective – those subsequently admitted upon state, it meets when the General Assembly is
the recommendation of the UN Security Council. in recess and assists this body in the
performance of its functions.
Qualifications for Membership 2. Military Staff Committee
1. Must be State 3. Human Rights Commission
2. Must be Peace-loving 
3. Must accept the obligations as member Specialized Agencies – not part of the UN, but
4. In the judgment of the Organization, be have been brought into close contact with it
able and willing to carry out such because of their purposes and functions, such as:
obligation. 1. World Health Organization
2. International Monetary Fund
How is Admission conducted? 3. Technical Assistance Board
1. Recommendation of a qualified majority
in the Security Council Proposals for Amendments to the UN Charter
- The affirmative vote of at least 9 and Ratification
members including the Big 5. 2 ways of adopting proposals:
2. Approval of the General Assembly (GA) a. directly, by 2/3 votes of all GA members
by a vote of at least 2/3 of those present and b. by 2/3 of a general conference called for this
voting. purpose by 2/3 of the GA and any 9 members of
the SC.
Note: Both SC and GA votes must be complied
with. Any amendment thus proposed shall be subject to
ratification by at least 2/3 of the GA, including
Suspension of Membership the permanent members of the SC.
Suspension may occur when a preventive or
enforcement action has been taken by the SC. ¯°º°¯
The SC may, by a qualified majority, recommend
suspension to the GA who shall in turn concur with UN General Assembly
a 2/3 vote of those present and voting.
This is the central organ of the UN. The principal
Discipline does not suspend the member’s deliberative body of the organization and is
obligations but only the exercise of its rights and vested with jurisdiction over matters concerning
privileges as a member. Only the SC may lift the the internal machinery and operations of the UN.
suspension by a qualified majority.
GA Composition
Expulsion of a Member Consists of all the members of the UN. Each
The penalty of expulsion may be imposed upon a member is entitled to send no more than 5
member which has persistently violated the delegates and 5 alternates and as many technical
principles in the UN Charter. Same voting and other personnel as it may need.
requirement as to suspension. The reason for this system of multiple delegates is
to enable the members to attend of several
Withdrawal of Membership – Indonesia Case meetings that may be taking place at the same

time in the different organs or committees of the six main committees. All issues are voted on
Organization. through resolutions passed in plenary meetings, Notes:
usually towards the end of the regular session,
However, each delegation is entitled only to one after the committees have completed their
vote in the decisions to be made by the GA. consideration of them and submitted draft
resolutions to the plenary Assembly.
GA Sessions
1. Regular sessions – every year beginning the Voting in Committees is by a simple majority. In
third Tuesday of September. plenary meetings, resolutions may be adopted by
acclamation, without objection or without a vote,
2. Special sessions – may be called at the or the vote may be recorded or taken by roll-call.
request of the SC, a majority of the member While the decisions of the Assembly have no
states, or one member with the concurrence legally binding force for governments, they carry
of the majority. the weight of world opinion, as well as the moral
3. Emergency special session – may be called authority of the world community.
within 24 hours at the request of the SC by
vote of any 9 members or by a majority of the The work of the UN year-round derives largely
members of the UN. from the decisions of the General Assembly - that
is to say, the will of the majority of the members
Some Important Functions of the GA as expressed in resolutions adopted by the
1. Deliberative – discuss principles regarding Assembly. That work is carried out:
maintenance of international peace and a. by committees and other bodies established
security and may take appropriate measures by the Assembly to study and report on
toward this end. specific issues, such as disarmament,
2. Supervisory – receives and considers reports peacekeeping, development and human
from the other organs of the UN. rights;
3. Elective – important voting functions are also b. in international conferences called for by the
vested in the GA, such as the election of the Assembly; and
non-permanent members of the SC, some c. by the Secretariat of the UN - the Secretary-
members of the TC and all the members of General and his staff of international civil
the ESC, and with the SC selects the judges of servants.
the ICJ; also participates in the amendment
of the Charter. ¯°º°¯
4. Budgetary – controls the finances of the UN
5. Constituent – amendment of the charter. UN Security Council

GA Voting Rules An organ of the UN primarily responsible for the

Each member or delegation has 1 vote in the GA. maintenance of international peace and security.
Important Questions are decided by 2/3 majority Their responsibility makes the SC a key influence
of those present and voting. All other matters, in the direction of the affairs not only of the
including the determination of whether a question Organization but of the entire international
is important or not, are decided by simple community as well.
Important Questions include: SC Functions and Powers:
a) peace and security 1. to maintain international peace and security
b) membership in accordance with the principles and
c) election purposes of the UN;
d) trusteeship system 2. to investigate any dispute or situation which
e) budget mightlead to international friction;
3. to recommend methods of adjusting such
disputes or the terms of settlement;
GA Main Committees 4. to formulate plans for the establishment of a
Most questions are then discussed in its six main system to regulate armaments;
committees: 5. to determine the existence of a threat to the
• 1st Committee - Disarmament & peace or act of aggression and to recommend
International Security what action should be taken;
• 2nd - Economic & Financial 6. to call on Members to apply economic
• 3rd - Social, Humanitarian & Cultural sanctions and other measures not involving
• 4th - Special Political & Decolonization the use of force to prevent or stop
• 5th - Administrative & Budgetary aggression;
• 6th - Legal 7. to take military action against an aggressor;
8. to recommend the admission of new
Some issues are considered only in plenary Members;
meetings, while others are allocated to one of the

9. to exercise the trusteeship functions of the a. questions relating to the organization and
UN in "strategic areas"; and meetings of the Council; Notes:
10. to recommend to the General Assembly the b. the establishment of subsidiary organs; and
appointment of the Secretary-General and, c. the participation of states parties to a dispute
together with the Assembly, to elect the in the discussion of the SC.
Judges of the International Court of Justice.
Substantial matters include those that may
SC Composition require the SC under its responsibility of
Composed of 15 members, 5 of which are maintaining or restoring world peace to invoke
permanent. The so-called Big Five are China, measures of enforcement.
France, the European Union, the United Kingdom,
and the United States. What is the role of a Member of the UN but not
a member of the Security Council?
The other ten members are elected for 2-year Although not a member of the SC, it may
terms by the GA, 5 from the African and Asian participate (without vote) in the discussion of any
states, 1 from Eastern European states, 2 from question before the Council whenever the latter
Latin American states, and 2 from Western feels that the interests of that member are
European and other states. Their terms have specially affected. Such member is likewise to
been so staggered as to provide for the retirement be invited by the Council to participate (without
of ½ of them every year. vote)in the discussion of any dispute to which the
Member is a party.
These members are not eligible for immediate re-
election. Q: Loolapalooza conducted illegal invasion and
conquest against Moooxaxa. The UN Security
Chairmanship of the SC is rotated monthly on the Council called for enforcement action against
basis of the English alphabetical order of the Loolapalooza. Does enforcement action include
names of the members. sending of fighting troops?
A: NO. Compliance with the resolution calling for
SC Sessions enforcement action does not necessarily call for
The SC is required to function continuously and to the sending of fighting troops. There must be a
hold itself in readiness in case of threat to or special agreement with the SC before sending of
actual breach of international peace. For this fighting troops may be had and such agreement
purpose, all members should be represented at all shall govern the numbers and types of forces,
times at the seat of the Organization. their degree of readiness and general locations,
and the nature of the facilities and assistance to
be supplied by UN members.
SC Voting Rules
Each member of the SC has 1 vote, but distinction
is made between the permanent and the non- International Court of Justice
permanent members in the decision of substantive
questions. International Court of Justice
Yalta Voting Formula Qualifications
a. Procedural matters – 9 votes of any of SC Jurisdiction
members Functions of International Court of Justice
b. Substantive matters – 9 votes including 5 Procedure
permanent votes.
No member, permanent or not, is allowed to vote
on questions concerning the pacific settlement of International Court of Justice
a dispute to which it is a party. The International Court of Justice is the principal
judicial organ of the United Nations. Its seat is at
Rule of Great-Power Unanimity: a negative vote the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). It
by any permanent member on a non-procedural began work in 1946, when it replaced the
matter, often referred to as “veto”, means Permanent Court of International Justice which
rejection of the draft resolution or proposal, even had functioned in the Peace Palace since 1922. It
if it has received 9 affirmative votes. operates under a Statute largely similar to that of
- Abstention or absence of a member is not its predecessor, which is an integral part
regarded as veto of the Charter of the United Nations.
Procedural and Substantive Matters ICJ Composition and Qualifications
Distinguished The Court is composed of 15 judges elected to
Procedural matters include: nine-year terms of office by the United Nations
General Assembly and Security Council sitting

independently of each other. It may not include 1. Nomination made by national groups in
more than one judge of any nationality. Elections accordance with the Hague Conventions of Notes:
are held every three years for one-third of the 1907. No group shall nominate more than
seats, and retiring judges may be re-elected. The four persons and not more than two of whom
Members of the Court do not represent their shall be of their own nationality.
governments but are independent magistrates. 2. Candidates obtaining an absolute
majority in the GA and SC are considered
QUALIFICIATIONS OF JUDGES elected. In the event that more than 1
1. They must be of high moral character; national of the same state obtain the
2. Possess the qualifications required in requisite majorities in both bodies, only the
their respective countries for appointment to eldest is chosen.
the highest judicial office or are jurists of 3. In cases when membership is not
recognized competence in international law; completed by the regular elections, a joint
and conference shall be convened. If this still
3. As much as possible, they must represent fails, the judges elected shall fill the
the main forms of civilization and the remaining vacancies.
principal legal systems of the world.
ICJ Sessions
When the Court does not include a judge The Court shall remain permanently in session at
possessing the nationality of a State party to a the Hague or elsewhere as it may decide, except
case, that State may appoint a person to sit as a during the judicial vacations the dates and
judge ad hoc for the purpose of the case. duration of which it shall fix.

ICJ Jurisdiction Procedure in the ICJ

The Court is competent to entertain a dispute The procedure followed by the Court in
only if the States concerned have accepted its contentious cases is defined in its Statute, and in
jurisdiction in one or more of the following ways: the Rules of Court adopted by it under the
a. by the conclusion between them of a Statute. The latest version of the Rules dates
special agreement to submit the dispute to from 5 December 2000. The proceedings include
the Court; a written phase, in which the parties file and
exchange pleadings, and an oral phase consisting
b. by virtue of a jurisdictional clause, of public hearings at which agents and counsel
i.e., typically, when they are parties to a address the Court. As the Court has two official
treaty containing a provision whereby, languages (English and French) everything written
in the event of a disagreement over its or said in one language is translated into the
interpretation or application, one of them other.
may refer the dispute to the Court. Several
hundred treaties or conventions contain a After the oral proceedings the Court deliberates
clause to such effect; or in camera and then delivers its judgment at a
c. through the reciprocal effect of public sitting. The judgment is final and without
declarations made by them under the Statute appeal. Should one of the States involved fail to
whereby each has accepted the jurisdiction comply with it, the other party may have recourse
of the Court as compulsory in the event of a to the Security Council.
dispute with another State having made a T
similar declaration. The declarations The Court discharges its duties as a full court but,
of 65 States are at present in force, a number at the request of the parties, it may also establish
of them having been made subject to the a special chamber. A Chamber of Summary
exclusion of certain categories of dispute. Procedure is elected every year by the Court in
accordance with its Statute. In July 1993 the
In cases of doubt as to whether the Court has Court also established a seven-member Chamber
jurisdiction, it is the Court itself which decides. to deal with any environmental cases falling
within its jurisdiction
Term of Office
Term of 9 years, staggered at three year year ICJ Voting Rules
intervals by dividing the judges first elected into All questions before the Court are decided by a
three equal groups and assigning them by lottery majority of the judges present, the quorum being
terms of three, six and nine years respectively. nine when it is sitting en banc. In case of tie, the
Immediate re-election is allowed. The President President or his substitute shall have a casting
and the Vice President elected by the Court for vote.
three years, may also be re-elected. Terms of
office of 5 of the 15 members shall expire at the Rule for Inhibition of Judges
end of every 3 years. No judge may participate in the decision of a case
in which he has previously taken part as agent,
How members of ICJ are chosen counsel or advocate for one of the parties, or as a

member of a national or international court, or of fact, only States which are parties to the statute
a commission of injury, or in any other capacity. of the ICJ and other states on conditions to be Notes:
laid down by the Security Council may be such
Functions of ICJ parties. Therefore, a private individual like A
The principal functions of the Court are: cannot bring an action before it.
2. to decide contentious case; and
3. to render advisory opinions. Q: May the United States be sued in our courts for
the value of private properties requisitioned by its
Who may file contentious cases? Army during the last World War, as well as Japan
Only states can file contentious cases and both for the “Mickey Mouse” money in payment for
must agree to the court’s jurisdiction. Only States private properties, which have not been
may apply to and appear before the Court. The redeemed until now? May the suit be brought to
Member States of the United Nations (at present the ICJ? (1979 Bar)
numbering 191) are so entitled. A: No! Even foreign states are entitled to the
• Article 34(1): Only states may be parties doctrine of state immunity in the local state. The
in cases before the Court. suit may not be brought before the ICJ without
• 2. Article 36(1): The jurisdiction of the the consent of the United States as jurisdiction of
Court comprises all cases which the parties the ICJ in contentious cases is based upon the
refer to it and all matters specially provided consent of the parties.
for in the Charter of the UN or in treaties and
conventions in force. Q: The State of Nova, controlled by an
authoritarian government, had unfriendly
Advisory Opinions relations with its neighboring state, America;
The advisory procedure of the Court is open solely Bresia, another neighboring state, had been
to international organizations. The only bodies at shipping arms and ammunitions to Nova for use
present authorized to request advisory opinions of in attacking America. To forestall am attack,
the Court are five organs of the United Nations and America placed floating mines on the territorial
16 specialized agencies of the United Nations waters surrounding Nova. America supported a
family. group of rebels organized to overthrow the
government of Nova and to replace it with a
friendly government. Nova decided to file a
On receiving a request, the Court decides which
case against America in the International Court
States and organizations might provide useful
of Justice.
information and gives them an opportunity of
1) What grounds may Nova’s cause of
presenting written or oral statements. The Court's
action against America be based?
advisory procedure is otherwise modelled on that
2) On what grounds may America move to
for contentious proceedings, and the sources of
dismiss the case with the ICJ?
applicable law are the same. In principle the
3) Decide the case. (1994 Bar)
Court's advisory opinions are consultative in
character and are therefore not binding as such on
A: 1) If Nova and America are members of the UN,
the requesting bodies. Certain instruments or
Nova can premise its cause of action on a
regulations can, however, provide in advance that
violation of Art. 2(4) of the UN Charter, which
the advisory opinion shall be binding.
requires members to refrain from threat or use of
force against the territorial integrity of political
• Only organizations can request independence of any state. If either or both
advisory opinions [Article 65(1)]: The Court America and Nova are not members of the UN,
may give an advisory opinion on any legal Nova may premise its cause of action of violation
question at the request of whatever body of the non-use of force principle in customary
may be authorized by or in accordance with international law which exist parallel as to Art.
the Charter of the UN to make such a 2(4) of the UN Charter.
In the case concerning the Military and
• There is no rule of stare decisis. Parliamentary activities in and against Nicaragua
(1986 ICJ Report 14), the International Court of
Q: A, a citizen of State X, was arrested and Justice considered the planting mines by one
detained for several years without charges or state within the territorial waters of another as a
trial. He brings his case to the courts of State violation of Art. 2(4) of the UN Charter. If the
X, but to no avail. He desires to seek redress support provided by America to rebels of Nova
from any international forum. He goes to you goes beyond the mere giving of monetary or
as counsel to file his case with the International psychological support but consist in the provision
Court of Justice. Will the action prosper? of arms and training, the acts of America can be
(1978 Bar) considered as indirect aggression amount to
A: No! Only States may be parties in contentious another violation of Art. 2(4).
cases before the International Court of Justice. In

In addition, even if the provision of support is not Art. 16 of the Statute of ICJ, no member of the
enough to consider the act a violation of the non- Court may appear as agent in any case. Notes:
use of force principle, this is a violation of the 3) Under Art. 39 of the Statute of ICJ, the official
principle of non-intervention in customary languages of the Court are English and French. In
international law. the absence of an agreement, each party may use
the language it prefers. At the request of any
Aggression is the use of armed force by a state party, the Court may authorize a party to use a
against the sovereignty or territorial integrity or language other than English or French.
political independence of another state or in any 4) Under Art. 51 of the Statute of ICJ, whenever
other manner inconsistence with the UN Charter. one of the parties does not appear before the
court or fails to defends its case, the other party
2) By virtue of the principle of sovereign may ask the Court to decide in favor of its claim.
immunity, no sovereign state can be made a party However, the Court must, before doing so, satisfy
to a proceeding before the ICJ unless it has given itself that it has jurisdiction and that the claim is
its consent. If America has not accepted the well-founded in fact and in law.
jurisdiction of the ICJ, it can invoke the defense
of lack of jurisdiction. Even if it has accepted the PIMENTEL, JR., v. OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE
jurisdiction of the ICJ but the acceptance limited SECRETARY
and the limitation applies to the case, it may 462 SCRA 622, 6 July 2005
invoke such limitations of its consent as a bar to En Banc, Garcia J.
the assumption of jurisdiction.

If the jurisdiction has been accepted, America can This is a petition for mandamus to compel the
involve the principle of anticipatory self-defense Office of the Executive Secretary and the
recognized under customary international law Department of Foreign Affairs to transmit the
because Nova is planning to launch an attack signed copy of the Rome Statute of the
against America by using the arms it brought from International Criminal Court to the Senate of the
Bresia. Philippines for its concurrence in accordance with
§21, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution.
3) If jurisdiction over America is established, the
case should be decided in favor of Nova, because The Rome State of the International Criminal
America violated the principle against the use of Court
force and the principle of non-intervention. The The Rome Statute established the International
defense of anticipatory self-defense cannot be Criminal Court which “shall have the power to
sustained because there is no showing that Nova exercise its jurisdiction over person for the most
had mobilized to such an extent that if America serious crimes of international concern x x x and
were to wait for Nova to strike first it would not shall be complementary to the national criminal
be able to retaliate. jurisdictions.” (Article I, Rome Statute) Its
jurisdiction covers the crime of genocide, crimes
However, if jurisdiction over America is not against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of
established, the case should be decided in its aggression as defined in the Statute (Article 5,
favor because of the principle of sovereign Rome Statute). The Statute was opened for
immunity. signature by all states in Rome on July 17, 1988
and had remained open for signature until
Q: The sovereignty over certain island is December 31, 2000 at the United Nations
disputed between State A and State B. These Headquarters in New York. The Philippines signed
two states agreed to submit their disputes to the Statute on December 28, 2000 through Charge
the ICJ. d’ Affairs Enrique A. Manalo of the Philippine
1) Does the ICJ have the jurisdiction to Mission to the United Nations. Its provisions,
take cognizance of the case? however, require that it be subject to
2) Who shall represent the parties before ratification, acceptance or approval of the
the Court? signatory states (Article 25, Rome Statute).
3) What language shall be used in the
pleading and the oral arguments?
4) In case State A, the petitioner fails to
appear at the oral argument, can State It is the theory of the petitioners that ratification
B, the respondent, move for the of a treaty, under both domestic law and
dismissal of the action? (1994 Bar) international law, is a function of the Senate.
A: 1) The ICJ has jurisdiction because the parties Hence, it is the duty of the executive department
have jointly submitted the case to it and have to transmit the signed copy of the Rome Statute
thus indicated their consent to its jurisdiction. to the Senate to allow it to exercise its discretion
2) Parties to a case may appoint agents to appear with respect to ratification of treaties. Moreover,
before the ICJ in their behalf, and these agents petitioners submit that the Philippines has a
need not be their own nationals. However, under ministerial duty to ratify the Rome Statute under
treaty law and customary international law.

Petitioners invoke the Vienna Convention on the thereof, since his office confers a right to
Law of Treaties enjoining the states to refrain participate in the exercise of the powers of that Notes:
from acts which would defeat the object and institution.”[Del Mar vs. Philippine Amusement
purpose of a treaty when they have signed the and Gaming Corporation, 346 SCRA 485 (2000)]
treaty prior to ratification unless they have made Thus, legislators have the standing to maintain
their intention clear not to become parties to the inviolate the prerogatives, powers and privileges
treaty (Article 18, Vienna Convention on the Law vested by the Constitution in their office and are
of Treaties). allowed to sue to question the validity of any
official action which they claim infringes their
prerogatives as legislators. The petition at bar
invokes the power of the Senate to grant or
On Locus Standi of Petitioners
withhold its concurrence to a treaty entered into
The petition at bar was filed by Senator Aquilino by the executive branch, in this case, the Rome
Pimentel, Jr. who asserts his legal standing to file Statute. The petition seeks to order the
the suit as member of the Senate; Congresswoman executive branch to transmit the copy of the
Loretta Ann Rosales, a member of the House of treaty to the Senate to allow it to exercise such
Representatives and Chairperson of its Committee authority. Senator Pimentel, as member of the
on Human Rights; the Philippine Coalition for the institution, certainly has the legal standing to
Establishment of the International Criminal Court assert such authority of the Senate.
which is composed of individuals and corporate
entities dedicated to the Philippine ratification of
the Rome Statute; the Task Force Detainees of The Substantive Issue
the Philippines, a juridical entity with the avowed The core issue in this petition for mandamus is
purpose of promoting the cause of human rights whether the Executive Secretary and the
and human rights victims in the country; the Department of Foreign Affairs have a ministerial
Families of Victims of Involuntary Disappearances, duty to transmit to the Senate the copy of the
a juridical entity duly organized and existing Rome Statute signed by a member of the
pursuant to Philippine Laws with the avowed Philippine Mission to the United Nations even
purpose of promoting the cause of families and without the signature of the President.
victims of human rights violations in the country;
Bianca Hacintha Roque and Harrison Jacob Roque, We rule in the negative.
aged two (2) and one (1), respectively, at the
time of filing of the instant petition, and suing In our system of government, the President, being
under the doctrine of inter-generational rights the head of state, is regarded as the sole organ
enunciated in the case of Oposa vs. Factoran, Jr. and authority in external relations and is the
224 SCRA 792 (1993) and a group of fifth year country’s sole representative with foreign
working law students from the University of the nations(Cortes, The Philippine Presidency: A
Philippines College of Law who are suing as Study of Executive Power (1966), p. 187) As the
taxpayers. chief architect of foreign policy, the President
acts as the country’s mouthpiece with respect to
Xxx international affairs. Hence, the President is
vested with the authority to deal with foreign
We find that among the petitioners, only Senator states and governments, extend or withhold
Pimentel has the legal standing to file the instant recognition, maintain diplomatic relations, enter
suit. The other petitioners maintain their into treaties, and otherwise transact the business
standing as advocates and defenders of human of foreign relations [Cruz, Philippine Political Law
rights, and as citizens of the country. They have (1996 Ed.), p. 223] . In the realm of treaty-
not shown, however, that they have sustained or making, the President has the sole authority to
will sustain a direct injury from the non- negotiate with other states.
transmittal of the signed text of the Rome Statute
to the Senate. Their contention that they will be Nonetheless, while the President has the sole
deprived of their remedies for the protection and authority to negotiate and enter into treaties, the
enforcement of their rights does not persuade. Constitution provides a limitation to his power by
The Rome Statute is intended to complement requiring the concurrence of 2/3 of all the
national criminal laws and courts. Sufficient members of the Senate for the validity of the
remedies are available under our national laws to treaty entered into by him. xxx
protect our citizens against human rights
violations and petitioners can always seek redress The participation of the legislative branch in the
for any abuse in our domestic courts. treaty-making process was deemed essential to
provide a check on the executive in the field of
As regards Senator Pimentel, it has been held that foreign relations (Cortes, supra note 12, p. 189).
“to the extent the powers of Congress are By requiring the concurrence of the legislature in
impaired, so is the power of each member the treaties entered into by the President, the

Constitution ensures a healthy system of checks to the scrutiny and consent of a department of
and balance necessary in the nation’s pursuit of the government other than that which Notes:
political maturity and growth [Bayan vs. Zamora, negotiated them.
342 SCRA 449 (2000)].
In filing this petition, the petitioners interpret
Section 21, Article VII of the 1987 Constitution to The last step in the treaty-making process is the
mean that the power to ratify treaties belongs to exchange of the instruments of ratification,
the Senate. which usually also signifies the effectivity of the
treaty unless a different date has been agreed
We disagree. upon by the parties. Where ratification is
dispensed with and no effectivity clause is
Justice Isagani Cruz, in his book on International embodied in the treaty, the instrument is deemed
Law, describes the treaty-making process in this effective upon its signature [Cruz, International
wise: Law (1998 Ed.), pp. 172-174]. [emphasis supplied]

The usual steps in the treaty-making process are: Petitioners’ arguments equate the signing of the
negotiation, signature, ratification, and exchange treaty by the Philippine representative with
of the instruments of ratification. The treaty may ratification. It should be underscored that the
then be submitted for registration and publication signing of the treaty and the ratification are two
under the U.N. Charter, although this step is not separate and distinct steps in the treaty-making
essential to the validity of the agreement as process. As earlier discussed, the signature is
between the parties. primarily intended as a means of authenticating
the instrument and as a symbol of the good faith
of the parties. It is usually performed by the
Negotiation may be undertaken directly by the state’s authorized representative in the
head of state but he now usually assigns this task diplomatic mission. Ratification, on the other
to his authorized representatives. These hand, is the formal act by which a state confirms
representatives are provided with credentials and accepts the provisions of a treaty concluded
known as full powers, which they exhibit to the by its representative. It is generally held to be an
other negotiators at the start of the formal executive act, undertaken by the head of the
discussions. It is standard practice for one of the state or of the government (Bayan vs. Zamora,
parties to submit a draft of the proposed treaty supra note 15). Thus, Executive Order No. 459
which, together with the counter-proposals, issued by President Fidel V. Ramos on November
becomes the basis of the subsequent 25, 1997 provides the guidelines in the
negotiations. The negotiations may be brief or negotiation of international agreements and its
protracted, depending on the issues involved, and ratification. It mandates that after the treaty has
may even “collapse” in case the parties are been signed by the Philippine representative, the
unable to come to an agreement on the points same shall be transmitted to the Department of
under consideration. Foreign Affairs. The Department of Foreign
Affairs shall then prepare the ratification papers
If and when the negotiators finally decide on the and forward the signed copy of the treaty to the
terms of the treaty, the same is opened for President for ratification. After the President
signature. This step is primarily intended as a has ratified the treaty, the Department of Foreign
means of authenticating the instrument and for Affairs shall submit the same to the Senate for
the purpose of symbolizing the good faith of the concurrence. Upon receipt of the concurrence of
parties; but, significantly, it does not indicate the Senate, the Department of Foreign Affairs
the final consent of the state in cases where shall comply with the provisions of the treaty to
ratification of the treaty is required. The render it effective. xxx
document is ordinarily signed in accordance with
the alternat, that is, each of the several Xxx
negotiators is allowed to sign first on the copy
which he will bring home to his own state.
Petitioners’ submission that the Philippines is
bound under treaty law and international law to
Ratification, which is the next step, is the formal ratify the treaty which it has signed is without
act by which a state confirms and accepts the basis. The signature does not signify the final
provisions of a treaty concluded by its consent of the state to the treaty. It is the
representatives. The purpose of ratification is ratification that binds the state to the provisions
to enable the contracting states to examine the thereof. In fact, the Rome Statute itself requires
treaty more closely and to give them an that the signature of the representatives of the
opportunity to refuse to be bound by it should states be subject to ratification, acceptance or
they find it inimical to their interests. It is for approval of the signatory states. Ratification is
this reason that most treaties are made subject

the act by which the provisions of a treaty are 3. Protective Principle

formally confirmed and approved by a State. By 4. Universality Principle Notes:
ratifying a treaty signed in its behalf, a state Exemptions from Jurisdiction
expresses its willingness to be bound by the Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
provisions of such treaty. After the treaty is Act of State Doctrine
signed by the state’s representative, the Right of Legation
President, being accountable to the people, is Classes of Heads of Missions
burdened with the responsibility and the duty to Diplomatic Corps
carefully study the contents of the treaty and Privileges and Immunities
ensure that they are not inimical to the interest Letter of Credence
of the state and its people. Thus, the President Functions of Diplomatic Representatives
has the discretion even after the signing of the Waiver of Diplomatic Immunity and Privileges
treaty by the Philippine representative whether or Duration of Immunity
not to ratify the same. The Vienna Convention on Termination of Diplomatic Relation
the Law of Treaties does not contemplate to Consular Immunity
defeat or even restrain this power of the head of 2 Kinds of Consuls
states. If that were so, the requirement of Consular Privileges and Immunities
ratification of treaties would be pointless and
futile. It has been held that a state has no legal or ¯°º°¯
even moral duty to ratify a treaty which has been
signed by its plenipotentiaries [Salonga and Yap, BASES OF JURISDICTION
Public International Law (5th Edition), p. 138]. A. Territoriality Principle
There is no legal obligation to ratify a treaty, but ☀ all persons,
it goes without saying that the refusal must be property, transactions and occurrences
based on substantial grounds and not on within the territory of a State are under
superficial or whimsical reasons. Otherwise, the its jurisdiction, as well as over certain
other state would be justified in taking offense consequences produced within the
(Cruz, International Law, supra note 16, p.174). territory by persons acting outside it.
☀ vests
It should be emphasized that under our jurisdiction in state where offense was
Constitution, the power to ratify is vested in the committed
President, subject to the concurrence of the ☀ Art. 14, NCC
Senate. The role of the Senate, however, is
limited only to giving or withholding its consent, EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION –
or concurrence, to the ratification (Bayan vs. ☀ often claimed by States with respect
Zamora, supra note 15). Hence, it is within the to so-called continuing offenses where
authority of the President to refuse to submit a the commission of the crime has started
treaty to the Senate or, having secured its in one State and is consummated in
consent for its ratification, refuse to ratify it another. Under such situation, both
(Cruz, International Law, supra note 16, p.174). states have jurisdiction.
Although the refusal of a state to ratify a treaty
which has been signed in its behalf is a serious Q: What is the meaning or concept of
step that should not be taken lightly (Salonga and extraterritoriality? (1977 Bar)
Yap, supra note 18), such decision is within the A: The term “extraterritoriality has been used to
competence of the President alone, which cannot denote the status of a person or things physically
be encroached by this Court via a writ of present on a State’s territory, but wholly or partly
mandamus. This Court has no jurisdiction over withdrawn from the State’s jurisdiction” by a rule
actions seeking to enjoin the President in the of international law.
performance of his official duties. [See Severino
vs. Governor-General, 16 Phil. 366 (1910)]. The Note: The concept of extraterritoriality is already
Court, therefore, cannot issue the writ of obsolete.
mandamus prayed for by the petitioners as it is
beyond its jurisdiction to compel the executive Q: Distinguish “exTERritoriality” and
branch of the government to transmit the signed “exTRAterritoriality.”
text of Rome Statute to the Senate. A:
exTERritoriality exTRAterritoriality
exception of persons used to denote the
and property from local status of a person or
jurisdiction on basis of things physically
Jurisdiction of States international customs present on a State’s
territory, but wholly or
Bases of Jurisdiction partly withdrawn from
1. Territoriality Principle the State’s jurisdiction”
2. Nationality Principle by a rule of

international law where they are committed or who

committed them, whether nationals or Notes:
Q: How can the observance of our law on non-nationals. This is, however,
national theory be enforced upon individuals, generally considered as forbidden.
and upon states? (1979 Bar) ☀ vest jurisdiction in state which
A: All persons within our national territory are has custody of offender of universal
subject to the jurisdiction of the Philippines, with crimes
certain exceptions like heads and diplomatic ☀ piracy, genocide
agents of foreign states.
Q: A Filipino owned construction company with
States are required under international law, principal office in Manila leased an aircraft
specifically under Article II, paragraph 4 of the UN registered in England to ferry construction
Charter, to respect the territorial integrity of workers to the Middle East. While on a flight to
other states. Any encroachments upon our Saudi Arabia with Filipino crew provided by the
territory, for example, by a foreign vessel, may lessee, the aircraft was highjacked by drug
be punished under our own laws, or by sanctions traffickers. The hijackers were captured in
allowed under the generally accepted principles Damaseus and sent to the Philippines for trial.
of international law. Do courts of Manila have jurisdiction over the
case? (1981 Bar)
Q: A crime was committed in a private vessel A: Yes. Hijacking is actually piracy, defined in
registered in Japan by a Filipino against an People vs. Lol-lo, 43 Phil 19 as robbery or forcible
Englishman while the vessel is anchored in a depredation in the high seas without lawful
port of State A. Where can he be tried? (1979 authority and done animo furandi and in the spirit
Bar) and intention of universal hostility.
A: Under both the English and French rules, the
crime will be tried by the local state A, if serious Piracy is a crime against all mankind.
enough as to compromise the peace of its port; Accordingly, it may be punished in the competent
otherwise by the flag state, Japan if it involves tribunal if any country where the offender may be
only the members of the crew and is of such a found or into which he may be carried.
petty nature as not to disturb the peace of the
local state. The jurisdiction on piracy unlike all other crimes
has no territorial limits. As it is against all, all so
B. Nationality Principle may punish it. Nor does it matter that the crime
was committed within the jurisdictional 3-mile
☀ a State may punish offenses limit of a foreign state for those limits, though
committed by its nationals anywhere in neutral to war, are not neutral to crimes.
the world.
☀ vest jurisdiction in state of offender DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
☀ Art. 15, NCC; tax laws Under this doctrine, a state enjoys immunity from
the exercise of jurisdiction by another state. The
C. Protective Principle courts of one state may not assume jurisdiction
☀ States claim extraterritorial over another state.
criminal jurisdiction to punish crimes
committed abroad which are prejudicial
Restrictive Application of the Doctrine of State
to their national security or vital
interests, even where the offenses are
perpetrated by non-nationals. Q: The Republic of Balau opened and operated
☀ vest jurisdiction in state whose in Manila an office engaged in trading of Balau
national interests is injured or national products with the Philippine products. In one
security compromised transaction, the local buyer complained that the
☀ counterfeiting, treason, Balau goods delivered to him were substandard
espionage and he sued the Republic of Balau before the
RTC of Pasig for damages. (1996 Bar)
Q: Explain the Protective Personality Principle. a) How can the Republic of Balau invoke its
(1991 Bar) sovereign immunity? Explain.
A: Protective Personality Principle is the b) Will such defense of sovereign immunity
principle on which the State exercise jurisdiction prosper? Explain.
over the acts of an alien even if committed
outside its territory, if such acts are adverse to A: a) By filing a motion to dismiss in accordance
the interest of the national state. with Section 1 (a) Rule 16 of the Rules of Court on
the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over
D. Universality Principle its person.
☀ A State has extraterritorial
jurisdiction over all crimes regardless of

According to the case of Holy See vs. Rosario, in A: The Court of Appeals should dismiss the
Public International Law, when a state wishes to petition in so far as it seeks to annul the order Notes:
plead sovereign immunity in a foreign court, it denying the motion of the Government of
requests the Foreign office of the state where it is Indonesia to dismiss the counterclaim. The
being sued to convey to the court that it is counterclaim in this case is a compulsory
entitled to immunity. In the Philippines, the counterclaim since it arises from the same
practice is for the foreign government to first contract involved in the complaint. As such, it
secure an executive endorsement of its claim of must be set up, otherwise, it will be barred.
immunity. In some case, the defense of sovereign Above all, as held in Froilan vs. Pan Oriental
immunity is submitted directly to the local court Shipping Co. 95 Phil 905, by filing a complaint,
by the foreign state through counsel by filing a the state of Indonesia waived its immunity from
motion to dismiss on the ground that the court has suit. It is not right that it can sue in the courts of
no jurisdiction over its person. the Philippines if in the first place it cannot be
sued. The defendant therefore acquires the right
b) No. The sale of Balau products as a contract to set up a compulsory counterclaim against it.
involves a commercial activity. As held by the
Supreme Court in the case of USA vs. Ruiz and USA However, The Court of Appeals should grant the
vs. Guinto, it was stated that a foreign state petition of the Indonesian Government insofar as
couldn’t invoke immunity from suit if it enters it sought to annul the garnishment of the funds of
into a commercial contract. The Philippines Indonesia, which were deposited in the PNB and
adheres to restrictive Sovereign Immunity. BPI.

In February 1990, the Ministry of the Army, Consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a foreign
Republic of Indonesia, invited for a bid for the court does not involve waiver of the separate
supply of 500,000 pairs of combat boots for the immunity from execution. (You can look but you
use of the Indonesian Army. The Marikina Shoe can’t touch.)
Corporation, a Philippine Corporation, which
has a branch office and with no assets in Thus as held in the case of Dexter vs. Carpenters,
Indonesia, submitted a bid to supply 500,000 P2d 705, it was held that consent to be sued does
pairs of combat boots at $30 per pair delivered not give consent to the attachment of the
in Jakarta on or before October 1990. The property of sovereign government.
contract was awarded by the Ministry of the
Army to Marikina Shoe Corporation and was Exemptions from Jurisdiction
signed by the parties in Jakarta. Marikina Shoe 1. Doctrine of State Immunity;
Expo was able to deliver only 200,000 pairs of 2. Act of State Doctrine – court of one state will
combat boots in Jakarta by October 30, 1990 not sit in judgment over acts of government
and received payment for 100,000 pairs or a of another state done in its territory.
total of $3,000,000. The Ministry of the Army 3. Diplomatic Immunity;
promised to pay for the other 100,000 pairs 4. Immunity of UN Specialized agencies, other
already delivered as soon as the remaining International Organizations, and its Officers;
300,000 pairs of combat boots are delivered, at 5. Foreign Merchant vessels exercising the right
which time the said 300,000 pairs will also be of innocent passage;
paid for. 6. Foreign armies passing through or stationed in
the territory with the permission of the State;
Q: Marikina Shoe Corporation failed to deliver 7. Warships and other public vessels of another
any more combat boots. On June 1, 1991, the State operated for non-commercial purposes.
Republic of Indonesia filed an action before the
RTC of Pasig, to compel Marikina Shoe ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE
Corporation to perform the balance of its Q: What is an Act of State?
obligation under the contract and for damages. A: An act of state is an act done by the sovereign
In its Answer, Marikina Shoe Corporation sets up power of a country, or by its delegate, within the
a counterclaim for $3,000,000 representing the limits of the power vested in him. An act of State
payment for the 100,000 pairs of combat boots cannot be questioned or made the subject of legal
already delivered but unpaid. Indonesia moved proceedings in court of law. Courts cannot
to dismiss the counterclaim asserting that it is pass judgment on acts of State done within its
entitled to sovereign immunity from suit. The territorial jurisdiction. It is different from
trial court denied the motion to dismiss and Sovereign Immunity from Suit. Here, you cannot
issued two writs of garnishment upon sue a sovereign State in the courts of another
Indonesian Government funds deposited in the State.
PNB and BPI. Indonesia went to the Court of
Appeals on a petition for certiorari under Rule Q: Why?
65 of the Rules of Court. How would the Court A: Would unduly vex the peace of nations based
of Appeals decide the case? (1991 Bar) on the doctrine of sovereign equality of States –
“Par in parem non habet imperium”

Diplomatic Corps
Q: What is the meaning or concept of “Act of A body formed by all diplomatic envoys Notes:
State” Doctrine? (1977 Bar) accredited to the same State. The Doyen or head
A: The Act of State Doctrine states that every of this body is usually the Papal Nuncio, or the
sovereign state is bound to respect the oldest accredited ambassador or plenipotentiary.
independence of other states and the court of one
country will not sit in judgment to the acts of the Privileges and immunities
foreign government done within its territory. a. Personal inviolability;
Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must b. Inviolability of premises and archives;
be obtained through the means open to be availed c. Right of an official communication;
of by sovereign powers as between themselves. d. Exemption from local jurisdiction;
e. Exemption from subpoena as witness;
DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY f. Exemption from taxation
It is the right to send and receive diplomatic Q: Who are the usual agents of diplomatic
missions. It is strictly not a right since no State intercourse?
can be compelled to enter into diplomatic A: The diplomatic relations of a state are usually
relations with another State. Diplomatic relations conducted through:
is established by mutual consent between two i. The head of state;
States. ii. The foreign secretary or minister; and
iii. The members of the diplomatic service.
Q: Is the state obliged to maintain diplomatic
relations with other states? Sometimes the state may appoint special
A: No, as the right of legation is purely diplomatic agents charged with either political or
consensual. If it wants to, a state may shut itself ceremonial duties, such as the negotiation of a
from the rest of the world, as Japan did until the treaty or attendance at a state function like a
close of the 19th century. However, a policy of coronation or a funeral.
isolation would hinder the progress of a state
since it would be denying itself of the many Q: How are the regular diplomatic
benefits available from the international representatives classified?
community. A:
i. Ambassadors or nuncios accredited to
Active right of legation – send diplomatic heads of states
ii. Envoys, ministers and internuncios
Passive right of legation – receive diplomatic accredited to heads of states
iii. Charges d’ affaires accredited to ministers
Resident Missions for foreign affairs
Classes of heads of missions [ A N E M I C ]
The diplomatic corps consists of different
a. Ambassadors or nuncios accredited to diplomatic representatives who have been
Heads of State and other heads of missions of
accredited to the local or receiving state. A doyen
equivalent rank; du corps or a dean, who is usually the member of
b. Envoys ministers and internuncios the highest rank and the longest service to the
accredited to Heads of State; state, heads it.
c. Charges d’affaires accredited to
Ministers for Foreign Affairs. In Catholic countries, the dean is the Papal
Functions of Diplomatic Missions
1. representing sending state in receiving state; Q: How are diplomatic representatives chosen?
2. protecting in receiving state interests of A: The appointment of diplomats is not merely a
sending state and its nationals; matter of municipal law for the receiving state is
3. negotiating with government of receiving not obliged to accept a representative who is a
state; persona non grata to it. Indeed, there have been
4. promoting friendly relations between sending cases when duly accredited diplomatic
and receiving states and developing their representatives have been rejected, resulting in
economic, cultural and scientific relations; strained relations between the sending and
5. ascertaining by all lawful means conditions receiving state.
and developments in receiving state and
reporting thereon to government of sending To avoid such awkward situation, most states now
state; and observe the practice of agreation, by means of
6. in some cases, representing friendly which inquiries are addressed to the receiving
governments at their request. state regarding a proposed diplomatic
representative of the sending state. It is only

when the receiving state manifests its agreement receiving state shall treat him
or consent that the diplomatic representative is with due respect and shall take Notes:
appointed and formally accredited. all appropriate steps to prevent
any attack on his person,
Q: What is agreation? freedom or dignity.
A: It is a practice of the states before appointing
a particular individual to be the chief of their b) A diplomatic agent shall enjoy
diplomatic mission in order to avoid possible immunity from the criminal,
embarrassment. It consist of two acts: civil and administrative
i. The Inquiry, usually informal, jurisdiction of the receiving
state, except in certain cases
addressed by the sending state to the
as, for example, when the civil
receiving state regarding the acceptability of
action deals with property held
an individual to be its chief of mission; and
by him in a private or
ii. The agreement, also informal,
proprietary capacity.
by which the receiving state indicates to the
sending state that such person, would be
acceptable. c) The diplomatic premises shall be
inviolable, and the agents of the
Letter of Credence (Letre d’ Creance) receiving state may not enter
The document, which the envoy receives from his them without the consent of the
government accrediting him to the foreign state head of the mission. Such
to which he is being sent. It designates his rank premises, their furnishings and
and the general object of his mission and asks other property thereon and the
that he be received favorably and that full means of transportation of the
credence be given to what he says on behalf of his mission shall be immune from
state. search, requisition, attachment
or execution. (See movie “Red
Letter Patent (Letre d’ Provision) Corner” starring Richard Gere).
The appointment of a consul is usually evidenced
by a commission, known sometimes as letter d) The archives and documents of
patent or letre d’ provision, issued by the the mission shall be inviolable at
appointing authority of the sending state and any time and wherever they may
transmitted to the receiving state through be.
diplomatic channels.
e) The receiving state shall permit
Functions of diplomatic representatives and protect free communication
The functions of diplomatic mission consist inter on the part of the mission for all
alia in: official purposes. In
a) Representing the sending state communicating with the
in the receiving state. government and other missions,
b) Protecting in the receiving state and consulates of the sending
the interests of the sending state and its state wherever situated, the
nationals. mission may employ all
c) Negotiating with the appropriate means, including
government of the receiving state. diplomatic couriers and
d) Ascertainment through lawful messages in code or cipher. The
means of the conditions and developments in official correspondence of the
the receiving state and reporting thereon to mission shall be inviolable.
the government of the sending state.
e) Promoting friendly relations f) Subject to its laws and
between the sending and receiving state and regulations concerning national
developing their economic, cultural and security, the receiving state
scientific relations. shall insure to all members of
f) In some cases, representing the mission freedom of
friendly governments at their request. movement and travel in its
Pointers on Diplomatic Immunities and
Privileges g) A diplomatic agent is not
The more important are the following: obliged to give evidence as a
a) The person of a diplomatic
agent shall be inviolable and he h) A diplomatic agent shall be
shall not be liable to any form of exempt from all dues and taxes,
arrest or detention. The personal or real, national,

regional, or municipal except in The official staff is made up of the administrative

certain specified cases like the and technical personnel of the mission, including Notes:
imposition of indirect taxes. those performing clerical work, and the member
of their respective families. The non-official staff
i) The mission and its head shall is composed of the household help, such as the
have the right to use the flag domestic servants, butlers, and cooks and
and emblem of the sending state chauffeurs employed by the mission.
on the premises of the mission,
including the residences of the As a rule, however, domestic servants enjoy
head of the mission and on his immunities and privileges only to the extent
means of transport. admitted by the receiving state and insofar as
they are connected with the performance of their
Q: Who may waive the diplomatic immunity and
privileges? Q: Italy, through its Ambassador, entered into a
A: The waiver may be made expressly by the contract with Abad for the maintenance and
sending state. It may also be done impliedly, as repair of specified equipment at its Embassy
when the person entitled to the immunity from and Ambassador’s Residence, such as air
jurisdiction commences litigation in the local conditioning units, generator sets, electrical
courts and thereby opens himself to any facilities, water heaters, and water motor
counterclaim directly connected with the pumps. It was stipulated that the agreement
principal claim. shall be effective for a period of four years and
automatically renewed unless cancelled.
However, waiver of immunity from jurisdiction Further, it provided that any suit arising from
with regard to civil and administrative the contract shall be filed with the proper
proceedings shall not be held to mean implied courts in the City of Manila.
waiver of the immunity with respect to the
execution of judgment, for which a separate Claiming that the Maintenance Contract was
waiver shall be necessary. unilaterally, baselessly and arbitrarily
terminated, Abad sued the State of Italy and its
Q: Is Diplomatic Immunity a Political Question? Ambassador before a court in the City of
A: Diplomatic immunity is essentially a political Manila. Among the defenses they raised were
question and the courts should refuse to look “sovereign immunity” and “diplomatic
beyond the determination by the executive immunity”. (2005 Bar)
branch. (DFA vs. NLRC, 1996) (a) As counsel of Abad, refute the
defenses of “sovereign immunity” and
Duration of the diplomatic immunities “diplomatic immunity” raised by the State
Unless waived, diplomatic immunities and of Italy and its Ambassador.
privileges begin from the moment diplomatic (b) At any rate, what should be the
agent arrives in the territory of the receiving court’s ruling on the said defenses?
state or, if already there, form the moment his A: (a) As a counsel of Abad, I shall argue that the
appointment is notified to its government, and contract is not a sovereign function and that the
lasts until he leaves, which must be within a stipulation that any suit arising under the contract
reasonable period following the termination of his shall be filed with the proper courts of the City of
mission. Manila is a waiver of the sovereign immunity from
suit of Italy. I shall also argue that the
With respect to his official acts, however, his ambassador does not enjoy diplomatic immunity,
immunity from the jurisdiction of the receiving because the suit relates to a commercial activity.
state continues indefinitely as these are the acts
attributed not to him but to the sending state. (b) The court should reject the defenses. Since
But this rule does not apply to his private acts, for the establishment of a diplomatic mission requires
which he may later be sued or prosecuted should the maintainance and upkeep of the embassy and
he return in a private capacity to the receiving the residence of the ambassador, Italy was acting
state or fail to leave it in due time after the end in pursuit of a sovereign activity when it entered
of his mission. into the contract. The provision in the contract
regarding the venue of lawsuits is not necessarily
Q: Who else besides the head of the mission are a wavier of sovereign immunity from suit. It
entitled to diplomatic immunities and should be interpreted to apply only where Italy
privileges? elects to sue in the Philippine courts or waives its
A: The diplomatic immunities and privileges are immunity by a subsequent act. The contract does
also enjoyed by the diplomatic suite or retinue, not involve a commercial activity of the
which consists of the official and non-official staff ambassador, because it is connected with his
of the mission. official functions. [Republic of Indonesia v.
Vinzon, 405 SCRA 126 (2003)]

Q: A foreign ambassador to the Philippines

Q: A group of high-ranking officials and rank and leased a vacation house in Tagaytay for his Notes:
file employees stationed in a foreign embassy in personal use. For some reason, he failed to pay
Manila were arrested outside embassy grounds the rentals for more than one year. The lessor
and detained at Camp Crame on suspicion that filed an action for the recovery of his property
they were actively collaborating with in court.
“terrorists” out to overthrow or destabilize the a) Can the foreign ambassador invoke his
Philippine Government. The Foreign diplomatic immunity to resist the lessor’s
Ambassador sought their immediate release, action?
claiming that the detained embassy officials and b) The lessor gets hold of evidence that the
employees enjoyed diplomatic immunity. If ambassador is about to return to his home
invited to express your legal opinion on the country. Can the lessor ask the court to
matter, what advice would you give. (2003 Bar) stop the ambassador’s departure from the
A: I shall advise that the high ranking officials and Philippine? (2000 Bar)
rank and file employees be released because of A: a) No, the foreign ambassador cannot invoke
their diplomatic immunity. Article 29 of the the diplomatic immunity to resist the action,
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations since he is not using the house in Tagaytay City
provides: for the purposes of his mission but merely for
vacation. Under 3(1)(a) of the Vienna Convention
“The person of a diplomatic agent shall be on Diplomatic Relations, a diplomatic agent has
inviolable. He shall not be liable to any form of no immunity in case of a real action relating to
arrest or detention.” private immovable property situated in the
territory of the receiving State unless he holds it
Under Article 37 of the Vienna Convention on on behalf of the sending State for purposes of the
Diplomatic Relations, members of the mission.
administrative and technical staff of the
diplomatic mission, shall, if they are not nationals b) No, the lessor cannot ask the court to stop the
of or permanent residents in the receiving State, departure of the ambassador from the Philippines.
enjoy the privileges and immunities specified in Under Article 29 of the Vienna Convention, a
Article 29. diplomatic agent shall not be liable to any form of
arrest or detention.
Under Article 9 of the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations, the remedy is to declare the Q: The United States Ambassador from the
high-ranking officials and rank and file employees Philippines and the American Consul General
personae non gratae and ask them to leave. also in the Philippines quarreled in the lobby of
Manila Hotel and shot each other. May the
Alternative A: Under the Vienna Convention on Philippine courts take jurisdiction over them for
Diplomatic Relations, a diplomatic agent “shall trial and punishment for the crime they may
not be liable to any form of arrest or detention have committed? (1979 Bar)
(Article 29) and he enjoys immunity from criminal A: The Ambassador is immune from prosecution
jurisdiction (Article 31). for all crimes committed by him whether officially
or in his private capacity.
This immunity may cover the “high ranking
officials” in question, who are assumed to be The consul is immune from criminal prosecution
diplomatic officers or agents. ONLY for acts committed by him in connection
with his official functions.
With respect to the “rank and file employees”
that are covered by the immunity referred to Q: The Ambassador of State X to the Philippines
above, provided that are not nationals or bought in the name of his government
permanent residents of the Philippines pursuant two houses and lots at Forbes Park,
to Article 37(2) of the said Convention. Makati. One house is used as the
chancery and residence of the
If the said rank and file employees belong to the ambassador, and the other as quarters
service staff of the diplomatic mission (such as for nationals of State X who are
drivers) they may be covered by the immunity studying in De La Salle University. The
(even if they are not Philippine nationals or Register of Deeds refused to register
residents) as set out in Article 37(3), if at the the sale and to issue Transfer
time of the arrest they were in “acts performed in Certificates of Title in the name of
the course of their duties.” If a driver was among State X. Is his refusal justified?
the said rank and file employees and he was
A: The prohibition in the Constitution against
arrested while driving a diplomatic vehicle or alienation of lands in favor of aliens does not
engaged in related acts, still he would be covered
apply to alienation of the same in favor of foreign
by the immunity. governments to be used as chancery and
residence of its diplomatic representatives. The

receiving state is under obligation to facilitate the They look mainly after the commercial interest of
acquisition on its territory, in accordance with its their own state in the territory of a foreign state. Notes:
laws, by the sending state of premises necessary
for its mission, or to assist the latter in obtaining They are not clothed with diplomatic character
accommodation in some other way. Therefore, and are not accredited to the government of the
the refusal of the Register of Deeds to register the country where they exercised their consular
sale and the issuance of TCT in the name of state functions; they deal directly with local
X is unjustified. authorities.

However, in so far as the house and lot to be used 2 Kinds of Consuls

as quarters of the nationals of State X who are b) consules missi – professional or
studying in De La Salle University are concerned, career consuls who are nationals of the
the Register of Deeds correctly refused sending state and are required to devote
registration. Here, the prohibition in the their full time to the discharge of their
constitution against the transfer of properties to duties.
parties other than the Filipino citizens or
corporation 60% of the capital of which is owned c) consules electi –may or may not be
by such citizens should be followed. nationals of the sending state and
perform their consular functions only in
Termination of Diplomatic Relation addition to their regular callings.
A diplomatic mission may come to an end by any
of the usual methods of terminating official Q: Where do consuls derive their authority?
relations like: A: Consuls derive their authority from two
principal sources, to wit, the letter patent or
Under Municipal Law: [ R A D A R ] letter ‘de provision, which is the commission
a) Resignation issued by the sending state, and the exequator,
b) Accomplishment of the purpose which is the permission given them by the
c) Death receiving state to perform their functions therein.

d) Abolition of the office Q: Do consuls enjoy their own immunities and

e) Removal privileges? Explain.
A: Yes, but not to the same extent as those
Under the International Law: [ W E R ] enjoyed by the diplomats.
a) War - the outbreak of war between Like diplomats, consuls are entitled to the
the sending and receiving states inviolability of their correspondence, archives and
terminates their diplomatic relations, other documents, freedom of movement and
which is usually severed before the travel, immunity from jurisdiction for acts
actual commencement of hostilities; performed in their official capacity and
b) Extinction - extinction of either the exemption from certain taxes and customs duties.
sending state or the receiving state will
also automatically terminate diplomatic However, consuls are liable to arrest and
relations between them; OR punishment for grave offenses and may be
c) Recall – may be demanded by the required to give testimony, subject to certain
receiving state when the foreign exceptions.
diplomat becomes a persona non grata to
it for any reason. Where the demand is The consular offices are immune only with respect
rejected by the sending state, the to that part where the consular work is being
receiving state may resort to the more performed and they may be expropriated for
drastic method of dismissal, by means of purposes of national defense or public utility.
which the offending diplomat is
summarily presented with his passport Q: Discuss the differences, if any, in the
and asked to leave the country. privileges or immunities of diplomatic envoys
and consular officers from the civil and criminal
Q: Will the termination of diplomatic relations jurisdiction of the receiving state. (1995 Bar)
also terminate consular relations between the A: Under Article 32 of the Vienna Convention of
sending and receiving states? Diplomatic Relations, a diplomatic agent shall
A: NO. Consuls belong to a class of state agents enjoy immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of
distinct from that of diplomatic officers. They do the receiving state. He shall also enjoy immunity
not represent their state in its relations with from its civil and administrative jurisdiction
foreign states and are not intermediaries through except in the case of:
whom matters of state are discussed between
governments. a) A real action relating to private
immovable property situated in the territory

of the receiving state, unless he holds it on behalf of the sending state for the purpose
behalf of the sending state for the purpose of of the mission. Notes:
the mission;
The action against the ambassador is a real action
b) An action relating to succession involving private immovable property situated
in which the diplomatic agent is involved as within the territory of the Philippines as the
executor, administrator, heir or legatee as receiving state. The action falls within the
private person and not on behalf of the exception to the grant of immunity from the civil
sending state; and administrative jurisdiction of the Philippines.

Alternative A: No, the action will not prosper.

c) An action relating to any Although the action is a real action relating to
professional or commercial activity exercised private immovable property within the territory of
by the diplomatic agent in the receiving state the Philippines, nonetheless, the vacation house
outside of his official functions. may be considered property held by the
Ambassador in behalf of his State (Kingdom of
On the other hand, under Article 41 of the Vienna Nepal) for the purposes of the mission, and
Convention on the Consular Relations, a consular therefore, such is beyond the civil and
officer does not enjoy immunity from the criminal administrative jurisdiction of the Philippines,
jurisdiction of the receiving state. Under Article including its court.
43 of the Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations, consular officers are not amenable to b) No, E cannot ask for the attachment of the
the jurisdiction of the judicial or administrative personal properties of the Ambassador. Article 30
authorities of the receiving state in respect of and 31 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
acts performed in the exercise of consular Relations provide that the papers, correspondence
functions. and the property of the diplomatic agent shall be
inviolable. Therefore, a writ of attachment
However, this does not apply in respect of a civil cannot be issued against the furniture and any
action either: personal property. Moreover, on the assumption
that the Kingdom of Nepal grants similar
a) Arising out of a CONTRACT protection to Philippine diplomatic agents,
concluded by a consular officer in which he Section 4 of RA 75 provides that any writ or
did not enter expressly or impliedly as an process issued by any court in the Philippines for
agent of the sending state. the attachment of the goods or chattel of the
b) By a third party for DAMAGES ambassador of a foreign state to the Philippines
arising from an accident in the receiving state shall be void.
caused by a vehicle, vessel or aircraft.
c) No, E cannot ask the court to stop the
Q: D, the Ambassador of the Kingdom of Nepal departure of the Ambassador of the Kingdom of
to the Philippines leased a house in Baguio City Nepal from the Philippines. Article 29 of the
as his personal vacation home. On account of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
military disturbance in Nepal, D did not receive provides: “The person of a diplomatic agent shall
his salary and allowances from his government be inviolable. He shall not be liable to any form
and so he failed to pay his rental for more than of arrest or detention.
one year. E, the lessor, filed an action for
recovery of his property with the RTC of Baguio Q: Explain, using example, the meaning of
City. (2000, 1989 Bar) exequator. (1991 Bar)
a) Can the action of E prosper? A: Exequator is an authorization from the
b) Can E ask for the attachment of the receiving state admitting the head of a consular
furniture and other personal properties of d post to the exercise of his functions. For
after getting hold of evidence that D is example, if the Philippines appoint a consul
about to leave the country? general for New York, he cannot start performing
c) Can E ask the court to stop D’s departure his functions unless the President of the United
from the Philippines? States issues an exequator to him.
A: a) Yes Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on
Diplomatic Relations provides: Q: X, a secretary and consul in the American
embassy in Manila, bought from B a diamond
“A diplomatic agent shall enjoy immunity ring in the amount of P 50,000, which he later
from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving gave as a birthday present to his Filipino
state. He shall also enjoy immunity from its girlfriend. The purchase price was paid in
civil and administrative jurisdiction, except in check drawn upon the Citibank. Upon
the case of: A real action relating to private presentment for payment, the check was
immovable property situated in the territory dishonored for insufficiency of funds. Because
of the receiving state, unless he holds it on X’s failure to make good of the dishonored

check, B filed a complaint against X in the

Office of the City Prosecutor of Manila for If the acts giving rise to a suit are those of a Notes:
violation of BP 22. After preliminary foreign government done by its foreign agent,
investigation, the information was filed against although not necessarily a diplomatic personage,
X in the City Court of Manila. X filed a motion but acting in his official capacity, the complaint
to dismiss the case against him on the ground could be barred by the immunity of the foreign
that he is a Secretary and Consul in the sovereign from suit without its consent.
American Embassy enjoying diplomatic
immunity from criminal prosecution in the Q: Adams and Baker are American citizens
Philippines. If you were the judge, how would residing in the Philippines. Adams befriended
you resolve the motion to dismiss? (1997 Bar) Baker and became a frequent visitor at his
house. One day, Adams arrived with 30
A: The motion to dismiss should be granted. As members of the Philippine National Police,
consul, X is not immune from criminal armed with a Search Warrant authorizing the
prosecution. Under paragraph 3 of Article 41 of search of Baker’s house and its premises for
the Vienna Conventions, a consular officer is not dangerous drugs being trafficked to the United
immune from the criminal jurisdiction of the States of America.
receiving state. In Schneekenburger vs. Mora, 63
Phil 249, it was held that a consul is not exempt The search purportedly yielded positive results,
from criminal prosecution in the country where he and Baker was charged with Violation of the
is assigned. Dangerous Drugs Act. Adams was the
prosecution’s principal witness. However, for
However, as a secretary in the American Embassy, failure to prove his guilt beyond reasonable
X enjoys diplomatic immunity from the criminal doubt, Baker was acquitted.
prosecution. As secretary, he is a diplomatic
agent. Under paragraph 1 of Article 3 of the Baker then sued Adams for damages for filing
Vienna Convention, a diplomatic agent against trumped-up charges against him. Among the
enjoys immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of defenses raised by Adams is that he has
the receiving state. diplomatic immunity, conformably with the
Q: a) A consul of a South American country Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. He
stationed in Manila was charged with serious presented Diplomatic Notes from the American
physical injuries. May he claim immunity from Embassy stating that he is an agent of the
jurisdiction of the local court? Explain. United States Drug Enforcement Agency tasked
with “conducting surveillance operations” on
b) Suppose after he was charged, he was suspected drug dealers in the Philippines
appointed as his country’s ambassador to the believed to be the source of prohibited drugs
Philippines. Can his newly gained diplomatic being shipped to the U.S. It was also stated that
status be a ground for the dismissal of his after having ascertained the target, Adams
criminal case? Explain. (1995 Bar) would then inform the Philippine narcotic
agents to make the actual arrest. (2005 Bar)
A: a) No, Under Article 41 of the Vienna
(a) As counsel of plaintiff Baker, argue
Convention, consuls do not enjoy immunity from
why his complaint should not be dismissed
the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving state.
on the ground of defendant Adams’
He is not liable to arrest or detention pending the
diplomatic immunity from suit.
trial unless the offense was committed against his
(b) As counsel of defendant Adams, argue
father, mother, child, ascendant, descendant or
for the dismissal of the complaint.
spouse. Consuls are not liable to arrest and
A: (a) As a counsel of Baker, I shall argue that
detention pending trial except in the case of
Baker has no diplomatic immunity, because he is
grave crime and pursuant to a decision by the
not performing diplomatic functions.
competent judicial authority. The crime of
physical injuries is not a grave crime unless it is
Alternative A: (a) As a counsel for Baker, I will
committed against the above-mentioned persons.
argue that Adam’s diplomatic immunity cannot be
b) Yes, Under Article 40 of the Vienna accepted as the sole basis for the dismissal of the
Convention, if a diplomatic agent is in the damage suit, by mere presentation of Diplomatic
territory of a third state, which has granted him a Notes stating that he is an agent of the US Drug
passport visa if such was necessary, while Enforcement Agency. His diplomatic status was
proceeding to take up his post, the third state matter of serious doubt on account of his failure
shall accord him inviolability and such other to disclose it when he appeared as principal
immunities as may be required to ensure his witness in the earlier criminal (drug) case against
transit. Baker, considering that as a matter of diplomatic
practice a diplomatic agent may be allowed or
authorized to give evidence as a witness by the
MUNICHER v. CA sending state. Thus, his diplomatic status was not
G.R. No. 142396, 11 February 2003 sufficiently established.

Q: What is extradition? To whom does it apply?

(b) As counsel of Adams, I shall argue that since Held: It is the “process by which persons charged Notes:
he was acting within his assigned functions with with or convicted of crime against the law of a
the consent of the Philippines, the suit against State and found in a foreign State are returned by
him is a suit against the United States without its the latter to the former for trial or punishment.
consent and is barred by state immunity from It applies to those who are merely charged with
suit. [Minucher v. CA, 397 SCRA 244, (2003)] an offense but have not been brought to trial; to
those who have been tried and convicted and
have subsequently escaped from custody; and
JURISDICTIONAL ASSISTANCE those who have been convicted in absentia. It
does not apply to persons merely suspected of
having committed an offense but against whom no
Extradition Defined charge has been laid or to a person whose
Extradition distinguished from Double Criminality presence is desired as a witness or for obtaining
Basis for Allowing Extradition or enforcing a civil judgment.” (Weston, Falk, D'
Rules in Interpretation of Extradition Treaty Amato, International Law and Order, 2nd ed., p.
Extradition Distinguished from Deportation 630 [1990], cited in Dissenting Opinion, Puno, J.,
Fundamental Principles Governing Extradition in Secretary of Justice v. Hon. Ralph C. Lantion,
Extradition of War Criminals and Terrorists G.R. No. 139465, Jan. 18, 2000, En Banc)
Attentat Clause
Five Postulates of Extradition Q: Discuss the basis for allowing extradition.
Right of Asylum Held: Extradition was first practiced by the
Asylum Distinguished from Refugees Egyptians, Chinese, Chaldeans and Assyro-
3 Essentials Elements of Refugees Babylonians but their basis for allowing
Non-Refoulment Principle extradition was unclear. Sometimes, it was
Nationality Distinguished from Citizenship granted due to pacts; at other times, due to plain
Doctrine of Effective Nationality good will. The classical commentators on
Statelessness international law thus focused their early views
on the nature of the duty to surrender an
¯°º°¯ extraditee --- whether the duty is legal or moral
in character. Grotius and Vattel led the school of
Extradition thought that international law imposed a legal
The delivery of an accused or a convicted duty called civitas maxima to extradite criminals.
individual to the State in whose territory he is In sharp contrast, Puffendorf and Billot led the
alleged to have committed a crime by the State school of thought that the so-called duty was but
on whose territory the alleged criminal or criminal an "imperfect obligation which could become
happens to be at the time. enforceable only by a contract or agreement
between states.
The legal duty to extradite a fugitive from justice
is based only on treaty stipulations, which are Modern nations tilted towards the view of
classified under two major types: Puffendorf and Billot that under international law
there is no duty to extradite in the absence of
Older Type Principle of treaty, whether bilateral or multilateral. Thus,
Double Criminality the US Supreme Court in US v. Rauscher (119 US
One, which contains a Sometimes called “no 407, 411, 7 S Ct. 234, 236, 30 L. ed. 425 [1886]),
specific list of offenses list treaty” held: “x x x it is only in modern times that the
that a fugitive should nations of the earth have imposed upon
have committed in The more modern type themselves the obligation of delivering up these
order to be extradited. contains no list of fugitives from justice to the states where their
crimes but provides that crimes were committed, for trial and punishment.
the offenses in question This has been done generally by treaties x x x
should be punishable in Prior to these treaties, and apart from them there
both states. was no well-defined obligation on one country to
deliver up such fugitives to another; and though
It should not require such delivery was often made it was upon the
that the name of the principle of comity x x x.” (Dissenting Opinion,
crime described should Puno, J., in Secretary of Justice v. Hon. Ralph C.
be the same in both Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, Jan. 18, 2000, En Banc)
countries. It is enough
that the particular act Q: What is the nature of an extradition
charged is a crime in proceeding? Is it akin to a criminal proceeding?
both jurisdictions. Held: [A]n extradition proceeding is sui generis.
It is not a criminal proceeding which will call into
operation all the rights of an accused as

guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. To begin with,

the process of extradition does not involve the Q: Will the retroactive application of an Notes:
determination of the guilt or innocence of an extradition treaty violate the constitutional
accused. His guilt or innocence will be adjudged prohibition against "ex post facto" laws?
in the court of the state where he will be Held: The prohibition against ex post facto law
extradited. Hence, as a rule, constitutional rights applies only to criminal legislation which affects
that are only relevant to determine the guilt or the substantial rights of the accused. This being
innocence of an accused cannot be invoked by an so, there is no merit in the contention that the
extraditee especially by one whose extradition ruling sustaining an extradition treaty’s
papers are still undergoing evaluation. As held by retroactive application violates the constitutional
the US Supreme Court in United States v. Galanis: prohibition against ex post facto laws. The treaty
is neither a piece of criminal legislation nor a
“An extradition proceeding is not a criminal criminal procedural statute. (Wright v. CA, 235
prosecution, and the constitutional safeguards SCRA 341, Aug. 15, 1994 [Kapunan])
that accompany a criminal trial in this country do
not shield an accused from extradition pursuant to Q: The Philippines and Australia entered into a
a valid treaty.” (Wiehl, Extradition Law at the Treaty of Extradition concurred in by the
Crossroads: The Trend Toward Extending Greater Senate of the Philippines on September 10,
Constitutional Procedural Protections To Fugitives 1990. Both governments have notified each
Fighting Extradition from the United States, 19 other that the requirements for the entry into
Michigan Journal of International Law 729, 741 force of the Treaty have been complied with. It
[1998], citing United States v. Galanis, 429 F. took effect in 1990.
Supp. 1215 [D. Conn. 1977])
The Australian government is requesting the
There are other differences between an Philippine government to extradite its citizen,
extradition proceeding and a criminal proceeding. Gibson, who has committed in his country the
An extradition proceeding is summary in natural indictable offense of Obtaining Property by
while criminal proceedings involve a full-blown Deception in 1985. The said offense is among
trial. In contradistinction to a criminal those enumerated as extraditable in the Treaty.
proceeding, the rules of evidence in an
extradition proceeding allow admission of For his defense, Gibson asserts that the
evidence under less stringent standards. In terms retroactive application of the extradition treaty
of the quantum of evidence to be satisfied, a amounts to an ex post facto law. Rule on
criminal case requires proof beyond reasonable Gibson’s contention. (2005 Bar)
doubt for conviction while a fugitive may be
ordered extradited “upon showing of the A: The contention of Gibson is not tenable. The
existence of a prima facie case.” Finally, unlike prohibition in Section 22, Article III of the
in a criminal case where judgment becomes Constitution refers to ex post facto laws. An
executory upon being rendered final, in an extradition treaty is not a criminal law. [Wright
extradition proceeding, our courts may adjudge v. CA, 235 SCRA 341 (1994)]
an individual extraditable but the President has
the final discretion to extradite him. The United Q: Discuss the rules in the interpretation of
States adheres to a similar practice whereby the extradition treaties.
Secretary of State exercises wide discretion in Held: [A]ll treaties, including the RP-US
balancing the equities of the case and the Extradition Treaty, should be interpreted in light
demands of the nation's foreign relations before of their intent. Nothing less than the Vienna
making the ultimate decision to extradite. Convention on the Law of Treaties to which the
Philippines is a signatory provides that “a treaty
As an extradition proceeding is not criminal in shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance
character and the evaluation stage in an with the ordinary meaning to be given to the
extradition proceeding is not akin to a preliminary terms of the treaty in their context and in light of
investigation, the due process safeguards in the its object and purpose.” X x x. It cannot be
latter do not necessarily apply to the former. gainsaid that today, countries like the Philippines
This we hold for the procedural due process forge extradition treaties to arrest the dramatic
required by a given set of circumstances “must rise of international and transnational crimes like
begin with a determination of the precise nature terrorism and drug trafficking. Extradition
of the government function involved as well as treaties provide the assurance that the
the private interest that has been affected by punishment of these crimes will not be frustrated
governmental action.” The concept of due by the frontiers of territorial sovereignty. Implicit
process is flexible for “not all situations calling in the treaties should be the unbending
for procedural safeguards call for the same kind commitment that the perpetrators of these crimes
of procedure.” (Secretary of Justice v. Hon. will not be coddled by any signatory state.
Ralph C. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, Oct. 17, 2000,
En Banc [Puno])

It ought to follow that the RP-US Extradition a) There is no legal obligation to surrender a
Treaty calls for an interpretation that will fugitive unless there is a treaty. Notes:
minimize if not prevent the escape of extraditees b) Religious and political offenses are generally
from the long arm of the law and expedite their not extraditable.
trial. X x x c) A person extradited can be prosecuted by the
requesting state only for the crime for which
[A]n equally compelling factor to consider is the he was extradited; and
understanding of the parties themselves to the d) Unless provided for in a treaty, the crime for
RP-US Extradition Treaty as well as the general which a person is extradited must have been
interpretation of the issue in question by other committed in the territory of the requesting
countries with similar treaties with the state.
Philippines. The rule is recognized that while
courts have the power to interpret treaties, the Q: John is a former President of the Republic X,
meaning given them by the departments of bent on regaining power which he lost to
government particularly charged with their President Harry in an election. Fully convinced
negotiation and enforcement is accorded great that he was cheated, he set out to destabilize
weight. The reason for the rule is laid down in the government of President Harry by means of
Santos III v. Northwest Orient Airlines, et al. (210 a series of protest actions. His plan was to
SCRA 256, 261 [1992]), where we stressed that a weaken the government and when the situation
treaty is a joint executive-legislative act which became ripe for a take-over, to assassinate
enjoys the presumption that “it was first carefully President Harry.
studied and determined to be constitutional
before it was adopted and given the force of law William, on the other hand, is a believer in
in the country.” (Secretary of Justice v. Hon. human rights and a former follower of President
Ralph C. Lantion, G.R. No. 139465, Oct. 17, 2000, Harry. Noting the systematic acts of harassment
En Banc [Puno]) committed by government agents against
farmers protesting the seizure of their lands,
Q: What is the difference, if any, between laborers complaining of low wages, and students
extradition and deportation? (1995 Bar) seeking free tuition, William organized groups
A: which held peaceful rallies in front of the
Presidential Palace to express their grievances.
Nature Normally Even if no crime On the eve of the assassination attempt, John’s
committed with was committed as men were caught by member of the Presidential
criminal long as the alien Security Group. President Harry went on air
offenses in the is extraditable threatening to prosecute plotters and dissidents
territory of the of his administration. The next day, the
requesting state government charged John with assassination
attempt and William with inciting to sedition.
Benefit Effected for the Effected for the
benefit of the protection of the John fled to Republic A. William, who was in
state to which state expelling an Republic B attending a lecture on democracy,
the person being alien because his was advised by his friends to stay in Republic B.
extradited will presence is
be surrendered inimical to public Both Republic A and Republic B have
because he is a good conventional extradition treaties with Republic
fugitive criminal X.
in that state
If Republic X requests the extradition of John
How? Effected on the The unilateral act and William, can Republic A deny the request?
basis of an of the state Why? State your reason fully. (2002 Bar)
extradition expelling the
treaty or upon alien A: Republic A can refuse to extradite John,
the request of because his offense is a political offense. John
another state was plotting to take over the government and the
plan of John to assassinate President Harry was
Where? The alien will be The undesirable part of such plan. However, if the extradition
surrendered to alien may be sent treaty contains an attentat clause, Republic A can
the state asking to any state extradite John because under the attentat clause,
for his willing to accept the taking of the life or attempt against the life of
extradition him a head of state or that of the members of his
family does not constitute a political offense and
is therefore extraditable.
Fundamental Principles Governing Extradition:

Alternative A: Republic A may or can refuse the Philippines and Canada, under the Treaty of
request of extradition of William because he is extradition between the Philippines and Canada, Notes:
not in its territory and thus it is not in the position the Philippines can request Canada to extradite
to deliver him to Republic X. Filipino who has fled to Canada.

Even if William were in the territorial jurisdiction Q: Patrick is charged with illegal recruitment
of Republic A, he may not be extradited because and estafa before the RTC of Manila. He
inciting to sedition, of which he is charged, jumped bail and managed to escape to America.
constitutes a political offense. It is a standard Assume that there is an extradition treaty
provision of extradition treaties, such as the one between the Philippines and America and it
between Republic A and Republic X, that political does not include illegal recruitment as one of
offenses are not extraditable. the extraditable offenses. Upon surrender of
Patrick by the US Government to the
Alternative A: Republic B can deny the request Philippines, Patrick protested that he could not
the request of Republic X to extradite William, be tried for illegal recruitment. Decide. (1998
because his offense was not a political offense. Bar)
On the basis of the predominance of A: Under the principle of specialty in extradition,
proportionality test, his acts were not directly Patrick cannot be tried for illegal recruitment
connected to any purely political offense. since this is not included in the list of extraditable
offenses in the extradition treaty between the
Q: On November 1, 1976, A, B, C and D, self Philippines and the United States, unless the
styled Moro rebels long wanted by the United States does not object to the trial of
authorities for the fatal ambuscade of a bus Patrick for illegal recruitment.
load of innocent civilians, hijacked a PAL lane
on its Manila-Davao flight which they forcibly Q: The Extradition Treaty between France and
diverted to, and landed in Jakarta Indonesia. In the Philippines is silent as to applicability with
that country, A, B, C and D sought political respect to crimes committed prior to its
asylum, invoking the UN Declaration on Human effectivity.
Rights. Reacting, the Philippine Government, a) Can France demand the extradition of A, a
through proper diplomatic channels sought after French national residing in the Philippines,
their extradition. May Indonesia grant asylum for an offense committed in France prior to
or should it extradite A, B, C and D to the the effectivity of the treaty? Explain.
Philippines. (1976 Bar) b) Can A contest his extradition on the ground
that it violates the ex post facto provision
Q: Sergio Osmeña III and Eugenio Lopez Jr. both in the Philippine Constitution? Explain.
charged with attempted assassination of (1996 Bar)
President Marcos before the military tribunal, A: a) In Clough vs. Strakesh, 109 Fed 330, it was
escaped from military custody, flew to Hong held that an extradition treaty applies to Crimes
Kong and then to California USA where they are committed before its effectivity unless the
reportedly seeking political asylum. There is no extradition treaty expressly exempts them. As
extradition treaty however between the Whiteman points out, extradition does not define
Philippines and the United States.Assuming that crimes but merely provides a means by which a
the Philippine Government desires the state may obtain the return and punishment of
surrender of the above-named fugitives to the persons charged with or convicted of having
Philippines to face trial before the military committed a crime who fled the jurisdiction of
tribunal, how can this be legally done under the state whose law has been violated. It is
International Law? (1978 Bar) therefore immaterial whether at the time of the
A: The Philippines may only request and cannot commission of the crime for which extradition is
demand the surrender of the two fugitives. As sought no treaty was in existence. If at the time
territorial sovereign, the United States is not of extradition is requested there is in force
obliged to return them but may decide to do so between the requesting and the requested state a
for reasons of comity. This is likely, however, treaty covering the offense on which the request
because the escapees are sought for political is based, the treaty is applicable.
offense and can claim the right of asylum under
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. b) No, as held in WRIGHT vs. CA, 295 SCRA 341,
the prohibition against ex post facto laws in
Q: Explain, using example, the principle of Section 22 of Article III of the Constitution applies
Double Criminality. (1991 Bar) to penal laws only and does not apply to
A: The principle of double criminality is the rule extradition treaties.
in extradition which states that for a request to
be honored, the crime for which the extradition is Extradition of War Criminals and Terrorists
requested must be a crime in both the requesting (Violators of crimes against international law)
state and the state to which the fugitive fled. For As violators of crimes against international law,
example, since murder is a crime both in the war criminals are subject to extradition in 1946,

the UN General Assembly passed a resolution

recommending to members and calling upon all The Proceedings Are Sui Generis. Notes:
non-members to extradite war criminals,
including traitors. THIRD, as pointed out in Secretary of Justice vs.
Lantion, extradition proceedings are not criminal
Attentat Clause in nature. In criminal proceedings, the
constitutional rights of the accused are at fore; in
A provision in an extradition treaty that stipulates
extradition, which is sui generis - in a class by
that the murder of the head of a foreign
itself – they are not.
government or the member of his family should
not be considered as a political offense.
Given the foregoing, it is evident that the
Doctrine of Reciprocity extradition court is not called upon to ascertain
If the requesting state is shown to be willing to the guilt or the innocence of the person sought to
surrender its own nationals for trial by the courts be extradited. Such determination during the
of another country, the detaining state must also extradition proceedings will only result in
surrender its own citizens for trial. needless duplication and delay.

5 POSTULATES OF EXTRADITION Extradition is merely a measure of international

judicial assistance through which a person
Extradition Is a Major Instrument for the charged with or convicted of a crime is restored
Suppression of Crime. to a jurisdiction with the best claim to try that
person. It is not part of the function of the
FIRST, extradition treaties are entered into for assisting authorities to enter into questions, which
the purpose of suppressing crime by facilitating are the prerogative of that jurisdiction.
the arrest and the custodial transfer of a fugitive
from one state to the other. The ultimate purpose of extradition proceedings
in court is only to determine whether the
With the advent of easier and faster means of extradition request complies with the Extradition
international travel, the flight of affluent Treaty, and whether the person sought is
Criminals from one country to another for the extraditable.
purpose of committing crime and evading
prosecution have become more frequent. Compliance Shall Be in Good Faith.
Accordingly, governments are adjusting their
methods of dealing with criminals and crimes that FOURTH, our executive branch of government
transcend international boundaries. voluntarily entered into the Extradition Treaty,
and our legislative branch ratified it. Hence, the
Today, “a majority of nations in the world Treaty carries the presumption that its
community have come to look upon extradition as implementation will serve the national interest.
the major effective instrument of international
co-operation in the suppression of crime”. It is Fulfilling our obligations under the Extradition
the only regular system hat has been devised to Treaty promotes comity with the requesting state.
return fugitives to the jurisdiction of a court On the other hand, failure to fulfill our obligations
competent to try them in accordance with thereunder paints a bad image of our country
municipal and international law. before the world community. Such failure would
discourage other states from entering into
The Requesting State Will Accord Due Process to treaties with us, particularly an extradition treaty
the Accused. that hinges on reciprocity.

Verily, we are bound by pacta sunt servanda to

SECOND, an extradition treaty presupposes that comply in good faith with our obligations under
both parties thereto have examined and that both the Treaty. This principle requires that we
accept and trust each other’s legal system and deliver the accused to the requesting country if
judicial process. More pointedly, our duly the conditions precedent to extradition, as set
authorized representative’s signature on an forth in the Treaty, is satisfied. In other words,
extradition treaty signifies our confidence in the the demanding government, where it has done all
capacity and the willingness of the other state to that the treaty and the law require it to do, is
protect the basic rights of the person sought to be entitled to the delivery of the accused on the
extradited. That signature signifies our full faith issue of the proper warrant, and the other
that the accused will be given, upon extradition government is under obligation to make the
to the requesting state, all relevant and basic surrender.” Accordingly, the Philippines must be
rights in the criminal proceedings that will take ready and in a position to deliver the accused,
place therein; otherwise, the treaty would not should it be found proper.
have been signed, or would have been directly
attacked for its unconstitutionality. There Is an Underlying Risk of Flight

Does this provision sanction RTC Judge

FIFTH, persons to be extradited are presumed to Purganan’s act of immediately setting for hearing Notes:
be flight risks. This prima facie presumption finds the issuance of a warrant of arrest? We rule in
reinforcement in the experience of the executive the negative:
branch nothing short of confinement can ensure
that the accused will not flee the jurisdiction of
A. On the Basis of the Extradition law
the requested state in order to thwart their
extradition to the requesting state.
It is significant to note that Section 6 of PD 1069,
The present extradition case further validates the our Extradition Law, uses the word “immediate”
to qualify the arrest of the accused. This
premise that persons sought to be extradited have
a propensity to flee. Indeed, extradition hearings “qualification would be rendered nugatory by
setting for hearing the issuance of the arrest
would not even begin, if only the accused were
willing to submit to trial in the requesting warrant. Hearing entails sending notices to the
opposing parties, receiving facts and arguments
country. Prior acts of herein respondent:
from them, and giving them time to prepare and
present such facts and arguments. Arrest
c) Leaving the requesting state right before the subsequent to a hearing can no longer be
conclusion of his indictment proceedings considered “immediate”. The law could not have
there; and intended the word as a mere superfluity but on
d) Remaining in the requested state despite the whole as a means of imparting a sense of
learning that the requesting state is seeking urgency and swiftness in the determination of
his return and that the crimes he is charged whether a warrant of arrest should be issued.
with are bailable - eloquently speak of his
aversion to the processes in the requesting By using the phrase “if it appears,” the law
state, as well as his predisposition to avoid further conveys that accuracy is not as important
them at all cost. as speed at such early stage. The trial court is
not expected to make an exhaustive
These circumstances point to an ever-present, determination to ferret out the true and actual
underlying high risk of flight. He has situation, immediately upon the filling of the
demonstrated that he has the capacity and the petition. From the knowledge and the material
will to flee. Having fled once, what is there to then available to it, the court is expected merely
stop him, given sufficient opportunity, from to get a good first impression - a prima facie
fleeing a second time? finding - sufficient to make a speedy initial
Q: Is the respondent in extradition proceeding determination as regards the arrest and detention
entitled to notice and hearing before the of the accused.
issuance of a warrant of arrest?
A: Both parties cite section 6 of PD 1069 in We stress that the prima facie existence of
support of their arguments. It states: probable cause for hearing the petition and, a
priori, for issuing an arrest warrant was already
“SEC. 6. Issuance of Summons; Temporary Arrest, evident from the petition itself and its supporting
Hearing, Service of Notices - documents. Hence, after having already
determined therefrom that a prima facie finding
(1) Immediately upon receipt of the petition, the did not exist, respondent judge gravely abused his
presiding judge of the court shall, as soon as discretion when he set the matter for hearing
practicable, summon the accused to appear and upon motion of Jimenez.
to answer the petition on the day and hour fixed
in the order. He may issue a warrant for the Moreover, the law specifies that the court se a
immediate arrest of the accused which may be hearing upon receipt of the answer or upon failure
served any where within the Philippines if it of the accused to answer after receiving the
appears to the presiding judge that the immediate summons. In connection with the matter of
arrest and temporary detention of the accused immediate arrest, however, the word “hearing” is
will best serve the ends of justice. Upon receipt notably absent from the provision. Evidently, had
of the answer, or should the accused after having the holding of a hearing at that stage been
received the summons fail to answer within the intended, the law could have easily so provided.
time fixed, the presiding judge shall hear the case It also bears emphasizing at this point that
or set another date for the hearing thereof. extradition proceedings are summary in nature.
Hence, the silence of the Law and the Treaty
(2) The order and notice as well as a copy of the leans to the more reasonable interpretation that
warrant of arrest, if issued, shall be promptly there is no intention to punctuate with a hearing
served each upon the accused and the attorney every little step in the entire proceedings.
having charge of the case.”
Verily, as argued by petitioner, sending to persons
sought to be extradited a notice of the request for
their arrest and setting it for hearing at some

future date would give them ample opportunity to At most, in cases of clear insufficiency of
prepare and execute an escape. Neither the evidence on record, judges merely further Notes:
Treaty nor the Law could have intended that examine complainants and their witnesses. In the
consequence, for the very purpose of both would present case validating the act of respondent
have been defeated by the escape of the accused judge and instituting the practice of hearing the
from the requested state. accused and his witnesses at this early stage
would be discordant with the rationale for the
entire system. If the accused were allowed to be
heard and necessarily to present evidence during
B. On the Basis of the Constitution the prima facie determination for the issuance of
a warrant of arrest, what would stop him from
Even Section 2 of Article III of our Constitution, presenting his entire plethora of defenses at this
which is invoked by Jimenez, does not require a stage -- if he so desires -- in his effort to negate
notice or a hearing before the issuance of a a prima facie finding? Such a procedure could
warrant of arrest. It provides: convert the determination of a prima facie case
into a full-blown trial of the entire proceedings
“Sec. 2 - The right of the people to be secure and possibly make trial of the main case
in their persons, houses, papers, and effects superfluous. This scenario is also anathema to the
against unreasonable searches and seizures and summary nature of extraditions.
seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose
shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or That the case under consideration is an
warrant of arrest shall issue except upon extradition and not a criminal action is not
probable cause to be determined personally by sufficient to justify the adoption of a set of
the judge after examination under oath or procedures more protective of the accused. If a
affirmation of the complainant and the different procedure were called for at all, a more
witnesses he may produce, and particularly restrictive one – not the opposite – would be
describing the place to be searched and the justified in view of respondent’s demonstrated
persons or things to be seized.” predisposition to flee.

To determine probable cause for the issuance of Q: Is respondent Mark Jimenez entitled to bail
arrest warrants, the Constitution itself requires during the pendency of the Extradition
only the examination - under oath or affirmation Proceeding?
- of complainants and the witnesses they may A: We agree with petitioner: As suggested by the
produce. There is no requirement to notify and use of the word “conviction,” the constitutional
hear the accused before the issuance of warrants provision on bail quoted above, as well as Section
of arrest. 4 of Rule 114 pf the Rules of Court, applies only
when a person has been arrested and detained for
In Ho vs. People and in all the cases cited therein, violation of Philippine criminal laws. It does not
never was a judge required to go to the extent of apply to extradition proceedings, because
conducting a hearing just for the purpose of extradition courts do not render judgments of
personally determining probable cause for the conviction or acquittal.
issuance of a warrant of arrest. All we required
was that the “judge must have sufficient Moreover, the constitutional right to bail “flows
supporting documents upon which to make his from the presumption of innocence in favor of
independent judgment, or at the very least, upon every accused who should not be subjected to the
which to verify the findings of the prosecutor as loss of freedom as thereafter he would be entitled
to the existence of probable cause.” to acquittal, unless his guilt be proved beyond
reasonable doubt.
In Webb vs. De Leon, the Court categorically
stated that a judge was not supposed to conduct a It follows that the constitutional provision on bail
hearing before issuing a warrant of arrest: will not apply to a case like extradition, where
the presumption of innocence is not at issue.
“Again, we stress that before issuing
warrants of arrest, judges merely The provision in the Constitution stating that the
determine personally the probability, not “right to bail shall not be impaired even when the
the certainty of guilt of an accused. In privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is
doing so, judges do not conduct a de novo suspended” does not detract from the rule that
hearing to determine the existence of the constitutional right to bail is available only in
probable cause. They just personally review criminal proceedings. It must be noted that the
the initial determination of the prosecutor suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas
finding a probable cause to see if it is corpus finds application “only to persons judicially
supported by substantial evidence.” charged for rebellion or offenses inherent in or
directly connected with invasion.” Hence, the
second sentence in the constitutional provision on

bail merely emphasizes the right to bail in process now has thus become hollow. He already
criminal proceedings for the aforementioned had that opportunity in the requesting state; yet Notes:
offenses. It cannot be taken to mean that the instead of taking it, he ran away.
right is available even in extradition proceedings
In this light, would it be proper and just for the
that are not criminal in nature.
government to increase the risk of violating its
treaty obligations in order to accord Respondent
That the offenses for which Jimenez is sought to
be extradited are bailable in the United States is Jimenez his personal liberty in the span of time
that it takes to resolve the Petition for
not an argument to grant him one in the present
case. To stress, extradition proceedings are Extradition? His supposed immediate deprivation
of liberty without the due process that he had
separate and distinct from the trial for the
offenses for which he is charged. He should apply previously shunned pales against the
government’s interest in fulfilling its Extradition
for bail before the courts trying the criminal cases
against him, not before the extradition court. Treaty obligations and in cooperating with the
world community in the suppression of crime.
Q: Will Mark Jimenez detention prior to the Indeed, “constitutional liberties do not exist in a
vacuum; the due process rights accorded to
conclusion of the extradition proceedings not
amount of his right to due process? individuals must be carefully balanced against
exigent and palpable government interests.”
A: Contrary to his contention, his detention prior
to the conclusion of the extradition proceedings
Too, we cannot allow our country to be a haven
does not amount to a violation of his right to due
process. We reiterate the familiar doctrine that for fugitives, cowards and weaklings who, instead
of facing the consequences of their actions,
the essence of due process is the opportunity to
be heard but, at the same time, point out that choose to run and hide. Hence, it would not be
good policy to increase the risk of violating our
the doctrine does not always call for a prior
opportunity to be heard. Where the treaty obligations if, through overprotection or
excessively liberal treatment, persons sought to
circumstances—such as those present in an
extradition case – call for it, a subsequent be extradited are able to evade arrest or escape
from our custody. In the absence of any provision
opportunity to be heard is enough. In the present
case, respondent will be given full opportunity to - in the Constitution, the law or the treaty -
expressly guaranteeing the right to bail in
be heard subsequently, when the extradition
court hears the Petition for Extradition. Hence, extradition proceedings, adopting the practice of
not granting them bail, as a general rule, would
there is no violation of his right to due process
and fundamental fairness. be a step towards deterring fugitives from coming
to the Philippines to hide from or evade their
Contrary to the contention of Jimenez, we find no prosecutors.
arbitrariness, either, in the immediate
deprivation of his liberty prior to his being heard. The denial of bail as a matter of course in
extradition cases falls into place with and gives
That his arrest and detention will not be arbitrary
is sufficiently ensured by: life to Article 14 of the Treaty, since this practice
would encourage the accused to voluntarily
1) The DOJ’s filing in court of the Petition surrender to the requesting state to cut short
their detention here. Likewise, their detention
with its supporting documents after a
determination that the extradition request pending the resolution of extradition proceedings
would fall into place with the emphasis of the
meets the requirements of the law and the
relevant treaty; Extradition Law on the summary nature of
extradition cases and the need for their speedy
2) The extradition judge’s independent
prima facie determination that his arrest will Q: What are the exceptions to the “No Bail”
best serve the ends of justice before the Rule in Extradition Proceedings?
issuance of a warrant for his arrest; and A: The rule, we repeat, is that bail is not a matter
of right in extradition cases.
3) His opportunity, once he is under the
court’s custody, to apply for bail as an However, the judiciary has the constitutional duty
exception to the no-initial-bail rule. to curb grave abuse of discretion and tyranny, as
well as the power to promulgate rules to protect
It is also worth noting that before the US and enforce constitutional rights. Furthermore,
government requested the extradition of we believe that the right to due process is broad
respondent, proceedings had already been enough to include the grant of basic fairness to
conducted in that country. But because he left extraditees. Indeed, the right to due process
the jurisdiction of the requesting state before extends to the “life, liberty or property” of every
those proceedings could be completed, it was person. It is “dynamic and resilient, adaptable to
hindered from continuing with the due processes every situation calling for its application.”
prescribed under its laws. His invocation of due

Accordingly and to best serve the ends of justice, the United States was requesting extradition.
we believe and so hold that, after a potential Hence, his constituents were or should have been Notes:
extraditee has been arrested or placed under the prepared for the consequences of the extradition
custody of the law, bail may be applied for and case against their representative, including his
granted as an exception, only upon a clear and detention pending the final resolution of the case.
convincing showing of the following: Premises considered and in line with Jalosjos, we
are constrained to rule against his claim that his
1) That, once granted bail, the applicant election to public office is by itself a compelling
will not be a flight risk or a danger to the reason to grant him bail.
community; and
2) That there exist special, humanitarian 2. Anticipated Delay
and compelling circumstances including, as a
matter of reciprocity, those cited by the Respondent Jimenez further contends that
highest court in the requesting state when it because the extradition proceedings are lengthy,
grants provisional liberty in extradition case it would be unfair to confine him during the
therein. pendency of the case. Again we are not
3) That, the extraditee will abide with all convinced. We must emphasize that extradition
the orders and processes of the extradition cases are summary in nature. They are resorted
court. to merely to determine whether the extradition
petition and its annexes conform to the
Extradition Treaty, not to determine guilt or
Since this exception has no express or specific innocence. Neither is it, as a rule, intended to
statutory basis, and since it is derived essentially address issues relevant to the constitutional rights
from general principles of justice and fairness, available to the accused in a criminal action. We
the applicant bears the burden of proving the are not overruling the possibility that petitioner
above two-tiered requirement with clarity; may, in bad faith, unduly delay the proceedings.
precision and emphatic forcefulness. This is another matter that is not at issue here.
The Court realizes that extradition is basically an Thus, any further discussion of this point would be
executive; not a judicial, responsibility arising merely anticipatory and academic. However, if
from the presidential power to conduct foreign the delay were due to maneuverings of
relations. In its barest concept, it partakes of the respondent, with all the more reason would the
nature of police assistance amongst states, which grant of bail not be justified. Giving premium to
is not normally a judicial prerogative. delay by considering it as a special circumstance
for the grant of bail would be tantamount to
Hence, any intrusion by the courts into the giving him the power to grant bail to himself. It
exercise of this power should be characterized by would also encourage him to stretch out and
caution, so that the vital international and unreasonably delay the extradition proceedings
bilateral interests of our country will not be even more. This we cannot allow.
unreasonably impeded or compromised. In short,
while this Court is ever protective of “the 3. Not a Flight Risk?
sporting idea of fair play,” it also recognizes the
limits of its own prerogatives and the need to Jimenez further claims that he is not a flight risk.
fulfill international obligations. To support this claim, he stresses that he learned
of the extradition request in June 1999; yet, he
Along this line, Jimenez contends that there are has not fled the country. True, he has not
special circumstances that are compelling enough actually fled during the preliminary stages of the
for the Court to grant his request for provisional request for his extradition. Yet, this fact cannot
release on bail. We have carefully examined be taken to mean that he will not flee as the
these circumstances and shall now discuss them. process moves forward to its conclusion, as he
hears the footsteps of the requesting government
1. Alleged Disenfranchisement inching closer and closer. That he has not yet
fled from the Philippines cannot be taken to mean
While his extradition was pending, Respondent that he will stand his ground and still be within
Jimenez was elected as a member of the House of reach of our government if and when it matters;
Representatives. On that basis, he claims that his that is, upon the resolution of the Petition for
detention will disenfranchise his Manila district of Extradition.
600,000 residents. We are not persuaded. In
People vs. Jalosjos, the Court has already In any event, it is settled that bail may be applied
debunked the disenfranchisement argument xxx. for and granted by the trial court at anytime after
the applicant has been taken into custody and
prior to judgment, even after bail has been
It must be noted that even before private previously denied. In the present case, the
respondent ran for and won a congressional seat extradition court may continue hearing evidence
in Manila, it was already of public knowledge that

on the application for bail, which may be granted her to answer and to appear at scheduled
in accordance with the guidelines in this Decision. hearing on the petition. Notes:
Discuss the Ten Points in 5) After being taken into custody, potential
Extradition proceedings. extraditees may apply for bail. Since the
applicants have a history of absconding,
1) The ultimate purpose of extradition they have the burden of showing that (a)
proceedings is to determine whether the their is no flight risk and no danger to
request expressed in the petition, the community; and (b) there exist a
supported by its annexes and the special, humanitarian or compelling
evidence that may be adduced during the circumstances. The grounds used by the
hearing of the petition, complies with highest court in the requesting state for
the Extradition Treaty and Law and the grant of bail therein may be
whether the person sought is considered, under the principle of
extraditable. The proceedings are reciprocity as a special circumstance.
intended merely to assist the requesting
state in bringing the accused -- or the In extradition cases, bail is not a matter of right;
fugitive who has illegally escaped -- it is subject to judicial discretion in the context of
back to its territory, so that the criminal the peculiar facts of each case.
process may proceed therein.
6) Potential extraditees are entitled to the
2) By entering into an extradition treaty, rights to due process and to fundamental
the Philippines is deemed to have fairness. Due process does not always call for
reposed its trust in the reliability or a prior opportunity to be heard. A
soundness of the legal and judicial subsequent opportunity to be heard is
system of its treaty partner, as well as in sufficient due process to the flight risk
the ability and the willingness of the involved. Indeed, available during the
latter to grant basic rights to the accused hearings on the petition and the answer is the
in the pending criminal case therein. full chance to be heard and to enjoy
fundamental fairness that is compatible with
3) By nature then, extradition the summary nature of extradition.
proceedings are not equivalent to a
criminal case in which guilt or 7) This Court will always remain a protector
innocence is determined. Consequently, of human rights, a bastion of liberty, a
an extradition case is not one in which bulwark of democracy and the conscience of
the constitutional rights of the accused society. But it is also well aware of the
are necessarily available. It is more limitations of its authority and of the need
akin, if at all, to a court’s request to for respect for the prerogatives of the other
police authorities for the arrest of the co-equal and co-independent organs of
accused who is at large or has escaped government.
detention or jumped bail. Having once
escaped the jurisdiction of the 8) We realize that extradition is essentially
requesting state, the reasonable prima an executive, not a judicial, responsibility
facie presumption is that the person arising out of the presidential power to
would escape again if given the conduct foreign relations and to implement
opportunity. treaties. Thus, the Executive Department of
government has broad discretion in its duty
and power of implementation.
4) Immediately upon receipt of the
petition for extradition and its 9) On the other hand, courts merely
supporting documents, the judge shall perform oversight functions and exercise
make a prima facie finding whether the review authority to prevent the exercise of
petition is sufficient in form and in grave abuse and tyranny. They should not
substance, whether it complies with the allow contortions, delays and “over-due
Extradition Treaty and the Law, and process” every little step of the way, lest
whether the person sought is these summary extradition proceedings
extraditable. The magistrate has become not only inutile but also sources of
discretion to require the petitioner to international embarrassment due to our
submit further documentation, or to inability to comply in good faith with a treaty
personally examine the affiants or partner’s simple request to return a fugitive.
witnesses. If convinced that a prima Worse our country should not be converted
facie case exists, the judge immediately into a dubious haven where fugitives and
issues a warrant for the arrest of the escapes can unreasonably delay, mummify,
potential extraditee and summons him or mock, frustrate, checkmate and defeat the

quest for bilateral justice and international the said proceedings, and would motivate
cooperation. respondent to flee the Philippines before the Notes:
request for extradition could be made.
10) At the bottom, extradition proceedings
should be conducted with all deliberate There is also the fact that respondent is charged
speed to determine compliance with the with seven (7) counts of accepting an advantage
Extradition Treaty and the Law; and while as an agent and seven (7) counts of conspiracy to
safeguarding basic individual rights, to avoid defraud, for each count of which, if found guilty,
the legalistic contortions, delays and he may be punished with seven (7) and fourteen
technicalities that may negate that purpose. (14) years imprisonment, respectively.
Undoubtedly, the gravity of the imposable penalty
upon an accused is a factor to consider in
CUEVAS V. MUŇOZ determining the likelihood that the accused will
G.R. No. 140520, 18 December 2000, Second abscond if allowed provisional liberty. It is, after
Division, De Leon, J. all, but human to fear a lengthy, if not a lifetime,
incarceration. Furthermore, it has also not
JUAN ANTONIO MUÑOZ is charged with seven (7) possessed of sufficient resources to facilitate an
counts of accepting an advantage as an agent escape from this jurisdiction.
contrary to Section 9(1)(a) of the Prevention of
Bribery Ordinance of. Cap 201 of Hong Kong, and That respondent did not flee despite the
seven (7) counts of conspiracy to defraud, investigation conducted by the Central bank and
contrary to the common law of Hong Kong, for the NBI way back in 1994, nor when the warrant
each count of which, if found guilty, he may be for his arrest was issued by the Hong Kong ICAC in
punished with seven (7) and fourteen (14) years August 1997, is not a guarantee that he will no
imprisonment, respectively. The Hong Kong flee now that proceedings for his extradition are
Magistrate’s Court issued a warrant for his arrest. well on the way. Respondent is about to leave the
Thereafter, the Philippine DOJ received a request protective sanctuary of his mother state to face
for the provisional arrest of MUÑOZ pursuant to criminal charges in another jurisdiction. It cannot
the RP-Hong Kong Extradition Agreement. The be denied that this is sufficient impetus for him to
Philippine DOJ forwarded the request for flee the country as soon as the opportunity to do
provisional arrest to the NBI, which filed an so arises.
application for the provisional arrest of MUÑOZ Respondent also avers that his mother’s
with RTC of Manila for and in behalf of the impending death makes it impossible for him to
government of Hong Kong. RTC granted the leave the country. However, by respondent’s own
application. However, CA declared the Order of admission, his mother finally expired at the
Arrest null and void. Cardinal Santos Hospital in Madaluyong City last
December 5, 1999.24
ISSUE: Whether Munoz should be provisionally
arrested The request for provisional arrest of respondent
and its accompanying document are valid despite
HELD: lack of authentication. There is no requirement
There was urgency for the provisional arrest of for the authentication of a request for provisional
the respondent. “Urgency" connotes such arrest and its accompanying documents. The
conditions relating to the nature of the offense pertinent provision of the RP-Hong Kong
charged and the personality of the prospective Extradition Agreement enumerates the documents
extraditee which would make him susceptible to that must accompany the request, as follows: (1)
the inclination if he were to learn about the an indication of the intention to request the
impending request for his extradition and/or surrender of the person sought; (2) the text of a
likely to destroy the evidence pertinent to the warrant of arrest or judgement of conviction
said request or his eventual prosecution and against that person; (3) a statement of penalty for
without which the latter could not proceed. Such that offense; and (4) such further information as
conditions exist in Munoz’s case. would justify the issue of a warrant of arrest had
the offense been committed or the person
convicted within the jurisdiction of the requested
At the time the request for provisional arrest was
party. That the enumeration does not specify
made, respondent’s pending application for the
that these documents must be authenticated
discharge of a restraint order over certain assets
copies, is not a mere omission of law. This may be
held in relation to the offenses with which he is
gleaned from the fact that while Article 11(1)
being charged, was set to be heard by the Court
does not require the accompanying documents of
of First Instance of Hong Kong on September 17,
a request for provisional arrest to be
1999. The Hong Kong DOJ was concerned that the
authenticated, Article 9 of the same Extradition
pending request for the extradition of the
Agreement makes authentication a requisite for
respondent would be disclosed to the latter during
admission in evidence of any document

accompanying a request for surrender or escape of potential extradites which can be

extradition. In other words, authentication is precipitated by premature which can be Notes:
required for the request for surrender or precipitated by premature information of the
extradition but not for the request for provisional basis of the request for his extradition. No Less
arrest. compelling at that stage of the extradition
proceedings is the need to be more deferential to
the provisions of PD 1069 and the RP-Hong Kong the judgement of a co-equal branch of the
Extradition Agreement, as they are worded, serve governments, the Executive, which has been
the purpose sought to be achieved by treaty endowed by our Constitution with greater power
stipulations for provisional arrest. The process of over matters involving our foreign relations.
preparing a formal request for extradition and its Needless to state, this balance of interests is not
accompanying documents, and transmitting them a static but a moving balance which can be
through diplomatic channels, is not only time- adjusted as the extradition process moves from
consuming but also leakage-prone. There is the administrative stage to the execution stage
naturally a great likelihood of flight by criminals depending on factors that will come into play. In
who get an intimation of the pending request for sum, we rule that the temporary hold on private
their extradition. To solve this problem, speedier respondent’s privilege of notice and hearing is a
initial steps in the form of treaty stipulations for soft retrains on his right to due process which will
provisional arrest were formulated. Thus, it is an not deprive him of fundamental fairness should he
accepted practice for the requesting state to rush decide to resist the request for his extradition to
its request in the form of a telex or diplomatic the United States. There is no denial of due
cable, the practically of the use of which in process as long as fundamental fairness is assured
conceded. even our own Extradition Law (PD a party.
1069) allows the transmission of a request for
provisional arrest via telegraph. In the advent of GOVERNMENT OF HONG KONG SPECIAL
modern technology, the telegraph or cable have ADMINISTRATIVE REGION V. JUDGE OLALIA, JR.
been conveniently replaced by the facsimile AND MUÑOZ,
machine. Therefore, the transmission by the Hong
GR No. 153675, April 19, 2007
Kong DOJ of the request for respondent’s
provisional arrest and the accompanying
documents, namely, a copy of the warrant of Bail Can Be Granted to Potential Extraditee on
arrest against respondent, a summary of the facts Basis of Clear and Convincing Evidence
of the case against him, particulars of his birth
and address, a statement of the intention to In its petition, Hong Kong sought the nullification
request his provisional arrest and the reason of the Manila RTC’s December 20, 2001 Order
therefor, by fax machine, more than serves this allowing Muñoz to post bail, and April 10, 2002
purpose of expediency. Order denying the motion to vacate the said Order
filed by the Government of Hong Kong Special
In tilting the balance in favor of the interests of Administrative Region, represented by the
the State, the Court stresses that it is not ruling Philippine Department of Justice. Hong Kong
that the private respondent has no right to due alleged that both Orders were issued by the judge
process at all throughout the length and breath of with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack
the extrajudicial proceedings. Procedural due or excess of jurisdiction as there is no provision in
process requires a determination of what process the Constitution granting bail to a potential
is due when it is due and the degree of what is extraditee.
due. Stated otherwise, a prior determination
should be made as to whether procedural A potential extraditee may be granted bail on the
protections are at all due and when they are due, basis of clear and convincing evidence that the
which in turn depends on the extent to which an person is not a flight risk and will abide with all
individual will be condemned to suffer grievous the orders and processes of the extradition court.
loss,’ We have explained why an extraditee has
not right to notice and hearing during the
evaluation stage of the extradition process. As Thus held the Supreme Court in dismissing the
aforesaid, P.D. 1069 xxx affords an extraditee petition of the Government of Hong Kong Special
sufficient opportunity to meet the evidence Administrative Region to nullify two orders by a
against him once the petition is filed in court. The Manila Regional Trial Court (RTC) allowing a
time for the extraditee to know the basis of the potential extraditee to post bail.
request for his extradition is merely moved to the
filing in court of the formal petition for In a unanimous decision penned by Justice
extradition. The extradites right to know is Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez in Government of
momentarily withheld during the evaluation stage Hong Kong v. Judge Olalia, Jr. and Muñoz (GR No.
of the extradition process to accommodate the 153675), the Court also remanded to the Manila
more compelling interest of the State to prevent RTC, Branch 8 to determine whether Juan Antonio

Muñoz is entitled to bail on the basis of “clear and Human Rights applies to deportation cases, there
convincing evidence.” If Muñoz is not entitled to is no reason why it cannot be invoked in Notes:
such, the trial court should order the cancellation extradition cases. After all, both are
of his bail bond and his immediate detention; and administrative proceeding where the innocence or
thereafter, conduct the extradition proceedings guilt of the person detained is not in issue,” the
with dispatch. Court said.

Muñoz was charged before the Hong Kong Court It further said that even if a potential extradite is
with three counts of the offense of “accepting an a criminal, an extradition proceeding is not by its
advantage as agent,” in violation of sec. 9 (1) (a) nature criminal, for it is not punishment for a
of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201 crime, even though such punishment may follow
of Hong Kong. He also faces seven counts of the extradition. It added that “extradition is not a
offense of conspiracy to defraud, penalized by the trial to determine the guilt or innocence of
common law of Hong Kong. potential extraditee. Nor is it a full-blown civil
action, but one that is merely administrative in
Citing the various international treaties giving character. By Jay B. Rempillo (SC website)
recognition and protection to human rights, the
Court saw the need to reexamine its ruling in
Government of United States of America v. Judge The Right of Asylum
Purganan which limited the exercise of the right Every foreign State can be at least a provisional
to bail to criminal proceedings. asylum for any individual, who, being persecuted
in his home State, goes to another State. In the
It said that while our extradition law does not absence of any international treaty stipulating the
provide for the grant of bail to an extraditee, contrary, no state is, by international laws,
there is no provision prohibiting him or her from obliged to refuse admission into its territory to
filing a motion for bail, a right under the such a fugitive or in case he has been admitted,
Constitution. to expel him or deliver him up to the prosecuting
“The time-honored principle of pacta sunt The right of asylum is not a right possessed by an
servanda demands that the Philippines honor its alien to demand that a state protect him and
obligations under the Extradition grant him asylum. At present, it is just a privilege
Treaty….However, it does not necessarily mean granted by a state to allow an alien escaping from
that in keeping with its treaty obligations, the the persecution of his country for political reasons
Philippines should diminish a potential to remain and to grant him asylum.
extraditee’s rights to life, liberty, and due
process. More so, where these rights are Q: Explain the right of asylum in international
guaranteed, not only by our Constitution, but also law. (Bar)
by international conventions, to which the A: The right of asylum is the competence of
Philippines is a party. We should not, therefore, every state inferred from its territorial supremacy
deprive an extraditee of his right to apply for bail, to allow a prosecuted alien to enter and to remain
provided that a certain standard for the grant is on its territory under its protection and thereby
satisfactorily met,” the Court said. grant asylum to him.

RP, being a signatory to the 1996 UN General Asylum and Refugees

Assembly which adopted the International A refugee is any person who is outside the country
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, is “under of his nationality or the country of his former
obligation to make available to every person habitual residence because he has or had well
under detention such remedies which safeguard founded fear of persecution by reason of his race,
their fundamental right to liberty,” said the religion, nationality or political opinion and is
Court. The RP and Hong Kong signed in 1995 an unable or, because of such fear, is unwilling to
extradition treaty which became effective in avail himself of the protection of the government
1997. of the country of his nationality, or, if he has no
nationality, to return to the country of his former
The Court noted that Munoz had been detained habitual residence.
from September 23, 1999 to December 20, 2001,
or for over two years without having been 3 Essential Elements to be considered a
convicted of any crime. Refugee:
1) The person is outside the country of his
nationality, or in the case of stateless
“If bail can be granted in deportation cases, we
persons, outside the country of habitual
see no justification why it should not also be
allowed in extradition cases. Likewise,
2) The person lacks national protection;
considering that the Universal Declaration of

3) The person fears persecution in his own ceases to be a private one but becomes one for
country. the public, that is, for the state. Notes:
The second element makes, a refugee a stateless DOCTRINE OF EFFECTIVE NATIONALITY
person. Because a refugee approximates a Within a third state, a person having more than
stateless person, he can be compared to a vessel one nationality shall be treated as if he had only
on the open sea not sailing under the flag of any one. Under the principle of effective nationality,
state, or be called flotsam and res nullius. the third state shall recognized conclusively in its
territory either the nationality of the country in
Only a person who is granted asylum by another which he is habitually and principally present or
state can apply for refugee status; thus the the nationality of the country with which he
refugee treaties imply the principle of asylum. appears to be in fact most closely connected.

Q: Sandoval’s Open Question No. 1 Statelessness

Is a refugee is included in the term stateless Statelessness is the condition or status of an
person or is it the other way around? individual who is born without any nationality or
who loses his nationality without retaining or
Suggested Answer: Analyze the elements before acquiring another.
one could be considered a refugee.
An example of the first case would be that of an
individual born in a state where only the jus
sanguinis is recognized to parents whose state
Non-Refoulment Principle observes only jus soli. The second case may be
Non-refoulment non-contracting state expel or illustrated by an individual who, after renouncing
return (refouler) a refugee, in any manner his original nationality in order to be naturalized
whatsoever, to the frontiers of territories where in another state, is subsequently denaturalized
his life or freedom would be threatened. (Article and thereafter denied repatriation by his former
33 of the Convention Relating to the Status of country.
The Principle of the non-refoulment was declared Q: Who are stateless persons under
to be a generally accepted principle by the International Law? (1995 Bar)
Convention relating to the status of stateless A: They are those who are not considered as
persons. national by any state under the operation of its
Nationality v. Citizenship
Nationality is the membership in a political Q: What are the consequences of statelessness?
community with all its concomitant rights and (1995 Bar)
obligations. It is the tie that binds an individual A: These are:
to his state, from which he can claim protection i. No state can intervene or
from the laws, which he is also obliged to follow. complain in behalf of the stateless
person for an international delinquency
Citizenship has a more exclusive meaning in that committed by another state in inflicting
it applies only to certain members of the state injury upon him;
accorded more privileges than the rest of the ii. He cannot be expelled by
people who owe it allegiance. Its significance is the state if he is lawfully in its territory
municipal and not international. except on grounds of national security or
public order;
Nationality is Important in Int’l Law iii. He cannot avail himself of
It is important because an individual can the protection and benefits of citizenship
ordinarily participate in international relations like securing for himself a passport or
only through the instrumentality of the state to visa and personal documents.
which he belongs, as when his government asserts
a claim on his behalf for injuries suffered by him Q: Victor Korchnoi, a stateless resident of
in foreign jurisdiction. This remedy would not be Switzerland, was the challenger to the world
available to a stateless person who will have no chess title held by Russian Anatoly Karpov.
state with international personality to intercede After 32 grueling games were played in Baguio
for him under the laws of nations. city, Karpov finally retained his title of a close 6
to 5 win. Korchnoi protested no-payment of his
Example, in the case of Holy See vs. Rosario, the prize money and alleged unfair treatment he
defendant in this case can invoke his rights received from the tournament organizers in the
against the Holy See not under the Municipal Law Philippines particularly in the 32nd crucial game,
but under International Law through his which he attributes as the main case of his
government, which will espouse his cause of defeat. May he press for his right to the prize
action in his behalf. If this happens, his concern

money against the Philippine government Interpretation of Treaties

through the Swiss government? (1978 Bar) Termination of Treaties Notes:
A: No, Switzerland even if she so desires, cannot State Responsibility for Injury to Aliens
espouse a diplomatic claim against the Philippines Doctrine of State Responsibility
in behalf of Victor Korchnoi. Nationality is the Conditions for Enforcement of Claim
basis of the right of state to espouse such claim. 1. nationality of the
In this case, Korchnoi is not a Swiss national but a claim
stateless person. 2. exhaustion of local
Q: Is a stateless person entirely without right, 3. waiver
protection or recourse under the Law of 4. unreasonable delay
Nations? Explain. (1995 Bar) 5. improper behavior by
A: No. Under the Convention in Relation to the the injured alien
Status of Stateless Persons, the Contracting States Methods of Pressing Claims
agree to accord the stateless persons within their Nature and Measure of Damages
territories treatment at least as favorable as that
accorded their nationals with respect to; ¯°º°¯
a) Freedom of religion;
b) Access to the courts; Sources:
c) Rationing of products in 1) International agreements – e.g. treaties
short supply; concluded between States
d) Elementary education; 2) Customary international law – e.g. the
e) Public relief and assistance; doctrine of rebus sic stantibus
f) Labor legislation; and
g) Social Security A. THE LAW OF TREATIES
They also agree to accord them treatment not less Treaty Defined
favorable than that accorded to aliens generally Q: What is a Treaty? Discuss.
in the same circumstances. The Convention also Held: A treaty, as defined by the Vienna
provides for the issuance of identity papers and Convention on the Law of Treaties, is “an
travel documents to the stateless persons. international instrument concluded between
States in written form and governed by
Q: What measures, if any, has International Law international law, whether embodied in a single
taken to prevent statelessness? (1995 Bar) instrument or in two or more related instruments,
A: In the Convention on the Conflict of and whatever its particular designation.” There
Nationality Laws of 1930, the Contracting States are many other terms used for a treaty or
agree to accord nationality to persons born in international agreement, some of which are: act,
their territory who would otherwise be stateless. protocol, agreement, compromis d' arbitrage,
The convention on the Reduction of Statelessness concordat, convention, declaration, exchange of
of 1961 provides that if the law of the Contracting notes, pact, statute, charter and modus vivendi.
States results in the loss of nationality, as a All writers, from Hugo Grotius onward, have
consequence of marriage or termination of pointed out that the names or titles of
marriage, such loss must be conditional upon international agreements included under the
possession or acquisition of another nationality. general term treaty have little or no significance.
Certain terms are useful, but they furnish little
more than mere description

The Law on International Obligations Article 2(2) of the Vienna Convention provides
that “the provisions of paragraph 1 regarding the
Sources of International Obligations use of terms in the present Convention are
The Law of Treaties without prejudice to the use of those terms, or to
Treaty Defined the meanings which may be given to them in the
2 Kinds of Treaties internal law of the State.” (BAYAN [Bagong
Parties Alyansang Makabayan] v. Executive Secretary
Requisites for Validity Ronaldo Zamora, G.R. No. 138570, Oct. 10, 2000,
Peremptory Norm En Banc [Buena])
Process of Treaty Making
Principle of Alternat Protocol de Clôture
Subject Matters of Treaties A final act, sometimes called protocol de cloture
Subject Matters of Executive Agreements is an instrument which records the winding up of
Most Favored Nation Clause the proceedings of a diplomatic conference and
Pacta Sunt Servanda usually includes a reproduction of the texts of
Rebus Sic Stantibus treaties, conventions, recommendations and other
Effect of Territorial Changes acts agreed upon and signed by the
plenipotentiaries attending the conference. It is

not the treaty itself. It is rather a summary of PARTIES

the proceedings of a protracted conference which Rule: Only States may enter into treaties or Notes:
may have taken place over several years. international agreements. Agreements between
State and individuals or entities other than States
Q: What is a "protocol de cloture"? Will it DO NOT come within the category of treaties.
require concurrence by the Senate?
Held: A final act, sometimes called protocol de Exceptions: States may enter into treaties or
cloture, is an instrument which records the international agreements with:
winding up of the proceedings of a diplomatic a) International Organizations
conference and usually includes a reproduction of b) Belligerent States
the texts of treaties, conventions,
recommendations and other acts agreed upon and 4 Essentials of Validity
signed by the plenipotentiaries attending the 1) Capacity of parties
conference. It is not the treaty itself. It is rather Rule: Every State possesses capacity to
a summary of the proceedings of a protracted conclude treaties as an attribute of its
conference which may have taken place over sovereignty.
several years. It will not require the concurrence
of the Senate. The documents contained therein Exceptions:
are deemed adopted without need for a) When it limits itself; or
ratification. (Tanada v. Angara, 272 SCRA 18, May b) When it is limited by some other
2, 1997 [Panganiban]) international arrangements
respecting some matters.
Treaty as main instrument
“The treaty is the main instrument with which the
society of States is equipped for the purpose of 2) Competence of particular organs
carrying out its multifarious transactions.” LORD concluding the treaty
McNAIR Rule: The municipal law of the State
concerned shall determine what organ
Synonymous words may conclude a treaty. As a rule, it is
a) Convention the Head of State who possesses the
b) Pact treaty-making power to be concurred in
c) Protocol by the legislative branch.
d) Agreement
e) Arrangement Exceptions:
f) Accord a) When it is in estoppel
g) Final Act b) When it has performed acts
h) General Act validating or curing the defects in
i) Exchange of Notes competence.
c) When it has received benefits or has
exercised its rights under the subject
☀ The use of particular treaty without expressly reserving its
terminology has no legal significance in non-liability or without interposing
international law.  other valid reasons for receiving or
exercising it.
Matters usually dealt with by treaties:
a) lease of naval bases
b) the sale or cession of territory
3) Reality of Consent
Rule: The plenipotentiaries of States or
c) the regulation of conduct of
the State itself must possess the capacity
to consent which consent is given in a
d) the termination of war
manner that is voluntary and free from
e) the formation of alliances
fear, force, coercion, intimidation, or
f) the regulation of commercial
g) the settling of claims
h) the establishment of international
a) Ratification – waiving the right to
withdraw from the treaty and
2 Kinds of Treaties
declaring its consent thereon as
a) traites-lois – law making treaties
b) traits-contrats – contract treaties
b) Estoppel - exercising its rights and
respecting the obligations in the
1969 Convention on the Law of Treaties
treaty notwithstanding knowledge of
Adopted by the Conference of the Law of Treaties
facts that vitiate its consent and
(Vienna Convention). Entered into force on
exercises them without protest.
January 27, 1960.

c) Prescription – filing of protest after between the obligations of the Members under the
the lapse of allowable period within UN Charter and their obligations under any Notes:
which the same may be entertained. international agreement, their obligations under
Thus, the State is deemed to have the UN Charter shall prevail.
ratified its consent.
Effect of Form on Validity
Remedy: Where the consent of a party There is no rule that treaties should be in written
has been given in error or induced form. Oral treaties are NOT prohibited.
through fraud on the part of the other However, orally agreed treaties are a rarity.
party, the treaty would be VOIDABLE.
Thus, the erring State must as soon as Note: The Vienna Convention, however, defines a
possible or within the time given in the “treaty” as “an international agreement
treaty, withdraw or correct its consent. concluded between States in written form and
governed by international law, whether embodied
in a singe instrument or in two or more related
Consent How Given instruments and whatever its particular
a) through a signature designation (is).”
b) exchange of instruments
c) ratification
e) approval or accession; or Usual Steps Taken
f) by other means so agreed. 1) Negotiation of parties
2) Signature of the agreed text
4) Legality of Object 3) Ratification or accession
Rule: Immorality, illegality or made by the treaty-making organs of States
impossibility of purpose or obligations concerned
makes a treaty null and void. e.g. a 4) Exchange or deposit of the
treaty by which a State agrees with instruments of ratification or accession.
another to appropriate a portion of the
high seas. At present, treaties are prepared and adopted by
means of international diplomatic conferences.
Exceptions: Also, a large number of multilateral conventions
a) If the immorality, illegality or have been adopted by international organizations
impossibility does not run counter to a such as the General Assemble of the UN.
universally recognized peremptory norm
of international law but only against a Principle of Alternat
remote and minor norm. According to this principle, the order of the
naming of the parties, and of the signatures of the
b) If it does not contravene or depart plenipotentiaries is varied so that each party is
from an absolute or imperative rule or named and its plenipotentiary signs first in the
prohibition of international law. e.g. jus coy of the instrument to be kept by it.
★ However, with respect to treaties with many
PEREMPTORY NORM parties, the practice is usually to arrange the
A norm generally accepted by the international names alphabetically in English or in French.
community of States as a whole as a norm from
which no derogation is permitted and which can Significance of Signature
be modified only by a subsequent norm of general Rule: The act of signature has little legal
international law having the same character. e.g. significance except as a means of authenticating
jus cogens the text of the treaty. It is the act of ratification
that is required to make a treaty binding.
Q: Explain, using example, jus cogens in
international law. (1991 Bar) Exceptions:
A: Jus cogens is a peremptory norm of general a) the treaty provides that signature shall have
international law accepted and recognized by the such effect;
international community as a whole. e.g. the b) it is otherwise established that the
prohibition against the use of force in dealing negotiating States were agreed that
with States. signatures should have that effect; or
c) the intention of the State to give that effect
INCOMPATIBILITY v. INCONSISTENCY to the signature appears from the full powers
Inconsistency raises the problem of conflict of of its representative or was expressed during
obligations. Incompatibility, on the other hand, the negotiations.
raises the question of nullity. e.g. Art. 103 of the
UN Charter provides that in the event of conflict Ratification

The act by which the provisions of a treaty are states because of their membership in the
formally confirmed and approved by a State. By family of nations. Notes:
ratifying a treaty signed in its behalf, a State
expresses its willingness to be bound by the 2. Under Article 2 of its charter,
provisions of such treaty. the UN shall ensure that non-member States
act in accordance with the principles of the
☀ State may Charter so far as may be necessary for the
ratify a treaty only when it is a signatory to maintenance of international peace and
it. security. Under Article 103, obligations of
member-states shall prevail in case of
☀ There is no conflict with any other international
moral duty on the part of the States to ratify agreement including those concluded with
a treaty notwithstanding that its non-members.
plenipotentiaries have signed the same. This
step, however, should not be taken lightly. 3. The treaty itself may expressly
extend its benefits to non-signatory states.
☀ A treaty may
provide that it shall not be valid even ratified 4. Parties to apparently unrelated
but shall be valid only after the exchange or treaties may also be linked by the most-
deposit of ratification has transpired. favored nation clause.

Q: What is ratification? Discuss its function in §21, A.VII, 1987 Phil. Constitution
the treaty-making process. No treaty or international agreement shall be
Held: Ratification is generally held to be an valid and effective unless concurred in by at least
executive act, undertaken by the head of state or 2/3 of ALL the Members of the Senate.
of the government, as the case may be, through
which the formal acceptance of the treaty is §20, A.VII, 1987 Phil. Constitution
proclaimed. A State may provide in its domestic The President may contract or guarantee foreign
legislation the process of ratification of a treaty. loans on behalf of the RP with the prior
The consent of the State to be bound by a treaty concurrence of the Monetary Board, and subject
is expressed by ratification when: (a) the treaty to such limitations as may be provided by law.
provides for such ratification, (b) it is otherwise The MB shall, within 30 days from the end of
established that the negotiating States agreed every quarter of the calendar year, submit to the
that ratification should be required, (c) the Congress a complete report of its decisions on
representative of the State has signed the treaty applications for loans to be contracted or
subject to ratification, or (d) the intention of the guaranteed by the Government or government-
State to sign the treaty subject to ratification owned and controlled corporations which would
appears from the full powers of its have the effect of increasing the foreign debt,
representative, or was expressed during the and containing other matters as may be provided
negotiation. (BAYAN [Bagong Alyansang by law.
Makabayan] v. Executive Secretary Ronaldo
Zamora, G.R. No. 138570, Oct. 10, 2000, En Banc §4, A.XVIII, 1987 Phil. Constitution
[Buena]) All exiting treaties or international agreements
which have not been ratified shall not be renewed
Accession or Adherence or extended without the concurrence of at least
When a State, who has NOT SIGNED a treaty, 2/3 of ALL the Members of the Senate.
accedes to it.
§25, A.XVIII, 1987 Phil. Constitution
Binding Effects of a Treaty After the expiration in 1991 of the Agreement
As a rule, a treaty is binding only on the between the RP and the USA concerning the
contracting parties, including not only the original Military Bases, foreign military bases, troops, or
signatories but also other states, which, although facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines
they may not have participated in the negotiation except under a treaty duly concurred in by the
of the agreement, have been allowed by its terms Senate and, when the Congress so requires,
to sign it later by a process known as accession. ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the
Non-parties are usually not bound under the people in a national referendum held for that
maxim of pacta tertiis nec noceat nec prosunt. purpose, and recognized as a treaty by the other
contracting State.
Q: Enumerate instances when a third State who
is non-signatory may be bound by a treaty. NOTE: This section prohibits, in the absence of a
A: treaty, the stationing of troops and facilities of
1. When a treaty is a mere formal foreign countries in the Philippines. However, it
expression of customary international law, DOES NOT INCLUDE the temporary presence in the
which, as such is enforceable on all civilized Philippines of foreign troops for the purpose of a

combined military exercise. Besides, the holding agreements are equally binding as treaties uon
of combined military exercise is connected with the States who are parties to them. Additionally, Notes:
defense, which is a sovereign function. under Article 2(1)(a) of the Vienna Convention on
the Law of Treaties, whatever may be the
Q: Discuss the binding effect of treaties and designation of a written agreement between
executive agreements in international law. States, whether it is indicated as a Treaty,
Held: [I]n international law, there is no Convention or Executive Agreement is not legally
difference between treaties and executive significant. Still it is considered a treaty and
agreements in their binding effect upon states governed by the international law of treaties.
concerned, as long as the functionaries have
remained within their powers. International law Q: The President authorized the Secretary of
continues to make no distinction between treaties Public Works and Highways to negotiate and
and executive agreements: they are equally sign a loan agreement with the German
binding obligations upon nations. (BAYAN [Bagong Government for the construction of a dam. The
Alyansang Makabayan] v. Executive Secretary Senate, by a resolution, asked that the
Ronaldo Zamora, G.R. No. 138570, Oct. 10, 2000, agreement be submitted to it for ratification.
En Banc [Buena]) The Secretary of Public Works and Highways did
not comply with the request of the Senate.
Q: Does the Philippines recognize the binding (1994 Bar)
effect of executive agreements even without a) Under the Constitution,
the concurrence of the Senate or Congress? what is the role of the Senate in the
Held: In our jurisdiction, we have recognized the conduct of foreign affairs?
binding effect of executive agreements even b) Is the president bound to
without the concurrence of the Senate or submit the agreement to the Senate for
Congress. In Commissioner of Customs v. Eastern ratification?
Sea Trading (3 SCRA 351, 356-357 [1961]), we had
occasion to pronounce: A:
a) The Senate plays a
“x x x the right of the Executive to enter into role in the conduct of foreign affairs, because
binding agreements without the necessity of of the requirement in Section 21 Article VII of
subsequent Congressional approval has been the Constitution that to be valid and
confirmed by long usage. From the earliest days effective, a treaty or international agreement
of our history we have entered into executive must be concurred in by at least 2/3 of all
agreements covering such subjects as commercial members of the senate.
and consular relations, most-favored-nation b) No, the President
rights, patent rights, trademark and copyright is not bound to submit the agreement to the
protection, postal and navigation arrangements Senate for ratification. Under Section 20
and the settlement of claims. The validity of Article VII of the Constitution, only the prior
these has never been seriously questioned by our concurrence of the Monetary Board is
courts. " (BAYAN [Bagong Alyansang Makabayan] v. required for the President to contract foreign
Executive Secretary Ronaldo Zamora, G.R. No. loans on behalf of the Republic of the
138570, Oct. 10, 2000, En Banc [Buena]) Philippines.

Q: An Executive Agreement was executed Q: In accordance with the opinion of the

between the Philippines and a neighboring Secretary of Justice, and believing that it would
State. The Senate of the Philippines took it be good for the country, the President enters
upon itself to procure a certified true copy of into an agreement with the Americans for an
the Executive Agreement and after deliberating extension for another five (5) years of their stay
on it, declared, by a unanimous vote, that the at their military bases in the Philippines, in
agreement was both unwise and against the consideration of:
best interest of the country. Is an Executivea) A yearly rental of one billion US dollars,
Agreement binding from the standpoints a) of payable to Philippine government in advance;
Philippine law and b) of international law?b) An undertaking on the part of the American
Explain. (2003 Bar) government to implement immediately the min-
A: a) YES, from the standpoint of Philippine law, Marshall plan for the country involving ten
the Executive Agreement is binding. According to billion US dollars in aids and concessional loans,
Commissioner of Customs v. Eastern Sea Trading, and
3 S 351 [1961], the President can enter into anc) An undertaking to help persuade American
Executive Agreement WITHOUT the necessity of banks to condone interests and other charges
concurrence by the Senate. on the country’s outstanding loans.

b) YES, it is also binding from the standpoint of In return, the President agreed to allow
international law. As held in Bayan V. Zamora, American nuclear vessels to stay for short visits
342 S 449 [2000], in international law executive at Subic, and in case of vital military need, to

store nuclear weapons at Subic and at Clark An executive agreement is NOT a treaty. As such,
Field. A vital military need comes, under the concurrence by two-thirds vote (2/3) of all the Notes:
agreement, when hostile military forces members of the Senate is not necessary for it to
threaten the sea-lanes from the Persian Gulf to become binding and effective.
the Pacific.
Q: Is VFA a treaty or a mere executive
The Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition comes to agreement?
you for advice on how they could legally A: In the case of Bayan vs. Zamora, VFA was
prevent the same agreement entered into by considered a treaty because the Senate concurred
the President with the US government from in via 2/3 votes of all its members. But in the
going into effect. What would you advice them point of view of the US Government, it is merely
to do? Give your reasons. (Bar) an executive agreement.
A: If the agreement is not in the form of treaty,
it is not likely to be submitted to the Senate for Q: What is the implication if only the senate of
ratification as required in Article VII, Section 21. the Philippines concur but not the senate of
It may not, therefore, be opposed in that branch USA?
of the government. Nor a judicial review is A: None, it is only a matter of policy and the same
feasible at this stage because there is no is governed by their respective Municipal Law.
justiciable controversy. While Article VIII, Section
1, paragraph 2 states that judicial power includes Q: Senate Bill No. 1234 was passed creating a
the duty of courts of justice to “determine joint legislative-executive commission to give
whether or not there has been a grave abuse of on behalf of the Senate, its advice, consent and
discretion amounting to lack or excess of concurrence to treaties entered into by the
jurisdiction on the part of any branch or President. The bill contains the guidelines to
instrumentality of the government,” it is clear be followed by the commission in the discharge
that this provision does not do away with the of its functions. Is the bill constitutional? (1996
political question doctrine. It was inserted in the Bar)
Constitution to prevent courts from making use of A: NO, the bill is not constitutional. The Senate
the doctrine to avoid what otherwise are cannot delegate its power to concur to treaties
justiciable controversies, albeit involving the ratified by the President.
Executive Branch of the government during the
martial law period. On the other hand, at this Q: Can the House of Representatives take active
stage, no justiciable controversy can be framed to part in the conduct of foreign relations,
justify judicial review. I would therefore advice particularly in entering into treaties and
the Nuclear Free Philippines Coalition to resort to international agreements? (1996 Bar)
the media to launch a campaign against A: NO. As held in US v. Curtiss Wright Export
Agreement Corporation 299 US 304, it is the President alone
who can act as representative of the nation in the
Subject Matter of Treaties conduct of foreign affairs. Although the Senate
1) Political Issues has the power to concur in treaties, the President
2) Changes in National Policies alone can negotiate treaties and Congress is
3) Involve International Agreements of a powerless to intrude into this. However, if the
Permanent Character matter involves a treaty or an executive
agreement, the HR may pass a resolution
Subject Matter of EAs expressing its views on the matter.
1) Have transitory effectivity
2) Adjustment of details carrying out well- Reservations
established national policies and traditions A unilateral statement, however phrased or
3) Arrangements of temporary nature named, made by a State, when signing, ratifying,
4) Implementation of treaties, statutes, well accepting, approving, or acceding to a treaty,
established policies. whereby it purports to exclude or modify the legal
effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their
Q: How does a treaty differ from executive application to that State.
A: An executive agreement is not a treaty in so When Reservation cannot be made
far as its ratification may not be required under a) If the treaty itself provides that NO
the Constitution. However, the distinction is reservation shall be admissible, or
purely municipal and has no international b) the treaty allows only specified reservations
significance. From the standpoint of international which do not include the reservation in
law, “treaties and executive agreement are alike question, or
in that both constitute equally binding obligations
upon the nations.” (FB Sayre, 39 Columbia Law c) the reservation is incompatible with the
Review, p. 75, 1939) object and purpose of the treaty.
Form and Time of Reservation

Written statement or declaration recorded at the unconditional. According to the clause in its
time of signing or ratifying or acceding to the unconditional form, any advantage of whatever Notes:
treaty. kind which has been or may in future be granted
by either of the contracting parties to a third
Objected Reservations State shall simultaneously and unconditionally be
Parties to the treaty may object to the extended to the other under the same or
reservations of a State entering the treaty. A equivalent conditions as those under which it has
1951 Advisory Opinion of the ICJ held that a been granted to the third State. (Salonga & Yap,
reserving State may be a party to a treaty Public International Law, 5th Edition, 1992, pp.
notwithstanding that one or more parties to the 141-142)
convention, but not all, objects to its reservations
and such reservations are not contrary to the 2. The purpose of a most favored nation clause is
object and purpose of said convention. to grant to the contracting party treatment not
REGISTRATION & PUBLICATION less favorable than that which has been or may be
Article 102, UN Charter granted to the "most favored" among other
1. Every treaty and every international agreement countries. The most favored nation clause is
entered into by any Member of the UN after the intended to establish the principle of equality of
present Charter comes into force shall as soon as international treatment by providing that the
possible be registered with the Secretariat and citizens or subjects of the contracting nations may
published by it. enjoy the privileges accorded by either party to
those of the most favored nation (Commissioner
2. No party to any such treaty or international of Internal Revenue v. S.C. Johnson and Son, Inc.,
agreement which has not been registered in 309 SCRA 87, 107-108, June 25, 1999, 3rd Div.
accordance with the provisions of para.1 of this [Gonzaga-Reyes])
Article may invoke that treaty or agreement
before any organ of the UN. Q: Explain the meaning of the concept of “most
favored nation” treatment? (1997 Bar)
★ The treaty, however, remains valid although A: The most favored nation treatment is that
not registered and not published in the UN. granted by one country to another not less
favorable than that which has been or may be
Entry into Force granted to the most favored among other
Means the date of effectivity of a treaty as countries. It usually applies to commercial
provided in the stipulations of the parties. In the transactions such as international trade and
absence of such stipulation, it is deemed in force investments.
as soon as the consent of ALL the parties are
established. Q: What is the essence of the principle behind
the "most-favored-nation" clause as applied to
Q: Are Treaties Self-Executing? tax treaties?
A: Qualified answer. In international law, it self- Held: The essence of the principle is to allow the
executes from the time of its entry into force. taxpayer in one state to avail of more liberal
However, there is NO absolute rule that treaties provisions granted in another tax treaty to which
are self-executing within the sphere of municipal the country of residence of such taxpayer is also a
law. Some municipal laws require further steps party provided that the subject matter of taxation
such as publication and promulgation before it x x x is the same as that in the tax treaty under
can produce legal effect. which the taxpayer is liable.

★ Nevertheless, in the Philippines, treaties are In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. S.C.

part of the law of the land. INCORPORATION Johnson and Son, Inc., 309 SCRA 87, June 25,
CLAUSE. 1999, the SC did not grant the claim filed by S.C.
Johnson and Son, Inc., a non-resident foreign
MOST-FAVORED-NATION CLAUSE corporation based in the USA, with the BIR for
Q: What is the “most-favored-nation” clause? refund of overpaid withholding tax on royalties
What is its purpose? pursuant to the most-favored-nation clause of the
A: 1. The most-favored-nation clause may be RP-US Tax Treaty in relation to the RP-West
defined, in general, as a pledge by a contracting Germany Tax Treaty. It held:
party to a treaty to grant to the other party
treatment not less favorable than that which has Given the purpose underlying tax treaties and the
been or may be granted to the “most favored” rationale for the most favored nation clause, the
among other countries. The clause has been concessional tax rate of 10 percent provided for in
commonly included in treaties of commercial the RP-Germany Tax Treaty should apply only if
nature. the taxes imposed upon royalties in the RP-US Tax
Treaty and in the RP-Germany Tax Treaty are paid
There are generally two types of most-favored- under similar circumstances. This would mean
nation clause, namely, conditional and that private respondent (S.C. Johnson and Son,

Inc.) must prove that the RP-US Tax Treaty grants Held: One of the oldest and most fundamental
similar tax reliefs to residents of the United rules in international law is pacta sunt servanda – Notes:
States in respect of the taxes imposable upon international agreements must be performed in
royalties earned from sources within the good faith. “A treaty engagement is not a mere
Philippines as those allowed to their German moral obligation but creates a legally binding
counterparts under the RP-Germany Tax Treaty. obligation on the parties x x x. A state which has
contracted valid international obligations is bound
The RP-US and the RP-West Germany Tax Treaties to make in its legislations such modifications as
do not contain similar provisions on tax crediting. may be necessary to ensure the fulfillment of the
Article 24 of the RP-Germany Tax Treaty x x x obligations undertaken.” (Tanada v. Angara, 272
expressly allows crediting against German income SCRA 18, May 2, 1997 [Panganiban])
and corporation tax of 20% of the gross amount of
royalties paid under the law of the Philippines. Influences to ensure observance to PSS
On the other hand, Article 23 of the RP-US Tax a) national self-interest
Treaty, which is the counterpart provision with b) a sense of duty
respect to relief for double taxation, does not c) respect for promises solemnly given
provide for similar crediting of 20% of the gross d) desire to avoid the obloquy attached
amount of royalties paid. X x x to breach of contracts
▪ Breach involves the obligation to make
X x x The entitlement of the 10% rate by U.S. reparations. There is, however, no
firms despite the absence of matching credit necessity to state this rule of reparation
(20% for royalties) would derogate from the design in the treaty itself because they are
behind the most favored nation clause to grant indispensable complement of failure to
equality of international treatment since the tax comply to one’s obligations.
burden laid upon the income of the investor is not
the same in the two countries. The similarity in
the circumstances of payment of taxes is a
condition for the enjoyment of most favored
nation treatment precisely to underscore the need One of the oldest and most fundamental rules in
for equality of treatment. international law is pacta sunt servanda -
international agreements must be performed in
2 Types good faith. "A treaty engagement is not a mere
a) Unconditional – any advantage of whatever kind moral obligation but creates a legally binding
which has been or may in future be granted by obligation on the parties x x x. A state which has
either of the contracting parties to a third State contracted valid international obligations is bound
shall simultaneously and unconditionally be to make in its legislations such modifications as
extended to the other under the same or may be necessary to ensure the fulfillment of the
equivalent conditions as those under which it has obligations undertaken."
been granted to the third State.
b) Conditional – advantages are specified and
limited not universal. The rule of pacta sunt servanda, one of the oldest
and most fundamental maxims of international
CIR V. JOHNSON & SON, INC. (1999) law, requires the parties to a treaty to keep their
agreement therein in good faith. The observance
The purpose of a most favored nation clause is to of our country's legal duties under a treaty is also
grant to the contracting party treatment not less compelled by Section 2, Article II of the
favorable than that which has been or may be Constitution which provides that "[t]he Philippines
granted to the "most favored" among other renounces war as an instrument of national
countries. The most favored nation clause is policy, adopts the generally accepted principles
intended to establish the principle of equality of of international law as part of the law of the land,
international treatment by providing that the and adheres to the policy of peace, equality,
citizens or subjects of the contracting nations may justice, freedom, cooperation and amity with all
enjoy the privileges accorded by either party to nations." Under the doctrine of incorporation,
those of the most favored nation. rules of international law form part of the law of
the land and no further legislative action is
PACTA SUNT SERVANDA (PSS) needed to make such rules applicable in the
(AGREEMENT MUST BE KEPT) domestic sphere (citing Salonga & Yap, Public
Means that treaties must be performed in good International Law, 1992 ed., p. 12).
faith. One of the oldest and most fundamental
rules of international law. CIR V. ROBERTSON (1986)

Q: Explain the “pacta sunt servanda” rule.


"The obligation to fulfill in good faith a treaty v. Northwest Orient Airlines, 210 SCRA 256, June
engagement requires that the stipulations be 23, 1992) Notes:
observed in their spirit as well as according to
their letter and that what has been promised be Limitations to RSS
performed without evasion, or subterfuge, a) It applies only to treaties of indefinite
honestly and to the best of the ability of the party duration;
which made the promise." (citing Kunz, The b) The vital change must have been unforeseen
Meaning and Range of the Norm (Pacta Sunt or unforeseeable and should have not been
Servanda, 29 A.J.I.L. 180 (1945); cited in caused by the party invoking the doctrine.
Freidmann, Lisstzyn, Pugh, International Law c) It must be invoked within reasonable time;
(1969) 329). Somehow, the ruling becomes an and
anacoluthon and a persiflage. d) It cannot operate retroactively upon the
provisions of a treaty already executed prior
to the change in circumstances.
Rules Governing Termination of RSS
t is not for this country to repudiate a a) a fundamental change (FC) must have
commitment to which it had pledged its word. occurred with respect to circumstances
The concept of pacta sunt servanda stands in the existing at the time of the conclusion of the
way of such an attitude, which is, moreover, at treaty;
war with the principle of international morality.
b) the existence of those circumstances
constituted the basis of the consent of the
parties to be bound by the treaty; and
c) the change has radically transformed the
This doctrine involves the legal effect of change
extent of the obligations still to be performed
in conditions underlying the purposes of a treaty.
under the treaty.
Simply stated, the disappearance of the
foundation upon which it rests.
When FC cannot be invoked
Authors, jurists, and tribunals are varied in the
a) if the treaty establishes a boundary
application of this doctrine. A majority, however,
b) if the FC is the result of the breach by the
hold that “the obligation of a treaty terminates
party invoking it of an obligation owed to any
when a change occurs in circumstances which
other party to the treaty.
existed at the time of the conclusion of the treaty
and whose continuance formed, according to the
intention or will of the parties, a condition of the SANTOS V. NORTHWEST AIRLINES (1992)
continuing validity of the treaty.” The change
must be vital or fundamental. Also, under this Obviously, rejection of the treaty, whether on the
doctrine, a treaty terminates if the performance ground of rebus sic stantibus or pursuant to
of obligations thereof will injure fundamental Article 39, is NOT a function of the courts but of
rights or interests of any one of the parties. the other branches of government. This is a
political act. The conclusion and renunciation of
Explain the "rebus sic stantibus" rule (i.e., treaties is the prerogative of the political
things remaining as they are). Does it operate departments and may not be usurped by the
automatically to render a treaty inoperative? judiciary. The courts are concerned only with the
Held: According to Jessup, the doctrine interpretation and application of laws and treaties
constitutes an attempt to formulate a legal in force and not with their wisdom or efficacy.
principle which would justify non-performance of
a treaty obligation if the conditions with relation
to which the parties contracted have changed so
materially and so unexpectedly as to create a PNCC V. CA (1997)
situation in which the exaction of performance
would be unreasonable. The key element of this
doctrine is the vital change in the condition of the The principle of rebus sic stantibus neither fits in
contracting parties that they could not have with the facts of the case. Under this theory, the
foreseen at the time the treaty was concluded. parties stipulate in the light of certain prevailing
conditions, and once these conditions cease to
The doctrine of rebus sic stantibus does not exist, the contract also ceases to exist. This
operate automatically to render the treaty theory is said to be the basis of Article 1267 of the
inoperative. There is a necessity for a formal act Civil Code, which provides:
of rejection, usually made by the head of state,
with a statement of the reasons why compliance “ART. 1267. When the service has become so
with the treaty is no longer required. (Santos III difficult as to be manifestly beyond the

contemplation of the parties, the obligor may also the text for the purpose of discovering its
be released therefrom, in whole or in part.” meaning. Notes:
This article, which enunciates the doctrine of
Preparatory works as a method of historical
unforeseen events, is NOT, however, an absolute
interpretation of a treaty. These works are
application of the principle of rebus sic stantibus,
examined for the purpose of ascertaining the
which would endanger the security of contractual
intention of the parties.
relations. The parties to the contract must be
presumed to have assumed the risks of
★ The interpretation of one State, even
unfavorable developments. It is therefore only in
absolutely exceptional changes of circumstances according to its municipal laws and given by
that equity demands assistance for the debtor its authorized organs within the State, is NOT
BINDING to the other party unless the latter
accepts it.
★ No interpretation is needed when the text is
clear and unambiguous.
Dispositive Treaties
★ A treaty may be authoritatively interpreted:
These are treaties which deal with rights over
territory and are deemed to run with the land and
a) by interpretation given by the treaty
are not affected by changes of sovereignty. e.g. itself
treaties dealing with boundaries between States. b) by mutual agreement or
c) through international court
▪ When an existing State acquires a territory, it arbitration
does not succeed to the predecessor State’s
treaties, but its own treaties becomes applicable TERMINATION OF TREATIES
to the newly acquired territory. Most Common Causes:
a) Termination of the treaty or withdrawal of a
New States Formed Through Decolonization party in accordance with the terms of the
a) a new State is under NO obligation to succeed b) In bipartite treaties, the extinction of one of
to the old State as a party to a multilateral
the parties terminates the treaty. Moreover,
treaty, but if it wants to do so, it has to
when the rights and obligations under the
notify the depository that it regards itself as
treaty would not devolve upon the State that
a succeeding party to the treaty.
may succeed to the extinct State.
b) a new State can be a party to an existing
c) Mutual agreement of ALL the parties;
treaty between the predecessor State and
another State only if the other State and the d) Denunciation of the treaty by one of the
new State both agree. Such, however, may parties. RIGHT OF DENUNCIATION – the right
be implied from the conduct of both States. to give notice of termination or withdrawal
which must be exercised if provided for in the
New States Formed Through Secession or treaty itself or impliedly;
Disintegration e) Supervening impossibility of performance;
Succeeds AUTOMATICALLY to most of the f) Conclusion of a subsequent inconsistent
predecessor’s treaties applicable to the territory treaty between the same parties;
that has seceded or disintegrated. g) Violation of the treaty;
h) Doctrine of RSS;
☀ “Clean Slate” i) War between the parties – war does not
Doctrine – Under this doctrine, seceding or abrogate ipso facto all treaties between the
disintegrating States DOES NOT make belligerents.
succession to an existing treaty automatic. j) Severance of diplomatic or consular
Interpretation of Treaties k) Emergence of a new peremptory norm
A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in contrary to the existing treaty.
accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given l) Voidance of the treaty because of defects in
to the terms of the treaty in their context and in its conclusion or incompatibility with
the light of its object and purpose. There are, international law or the UN Charter.
Generally regarded by publicists as applicable to Rule: NO State is under obligation to admit aliens.
treaties consist largely of the application of This flows from sovereignty.
principles of logic, equity and common sense to Exception: If there is a treaty stipulation
imposing that duty.

investigate the case, punish the guilty, or to

★ State may subject admission of aliens to enable the victim or his heirs to pursue civil Notes:
certain legal conditions. e.g. quota system remedies.

★ State may expel aliens within its territory.

Expulsion may be predicated on the ground
that the presence of the alien in the territory Function
will menace the security of the State. To provide, in the general world interest,
adequate protection for the stranger, to the end
★ This is subject to the “Non-Refoulement that travel, trade and intercourse may be
Principle.” facilitated.

Reconduction Essential Elements:

It means the forcible conveying of aliens. As a 1) an act or omission in violation of
State cannot refuse to receive such of its subjects international law
as are expelled from abroad, the home State of 2) which is imputable to the State
such aliens as are reconducted has the obligation 3) which results in injury to the claimant
to receive them. either directly or indirectly through
damage to a national.
Position of Aliens After Reception
When aliens are received, they are subject to the Acts or Omissions Imputable to the State
municipal laws of the receiving State. It is necessary to distinguish acts of private
a) Transient - individuals and those of government officials and
b) Domiciled/Residents – domicile organs.
creates a sort of qualified or temporary
allegiance. Subjected to restrictions not Denial of Justice
usually imposed against transient aliens. This term has been restrictively construed as an
injury committed by a court of justice. There is
denial of justice when there is:
★ Limitations - aliens’ rights a) unwarranted delay,
are not at par with citizens’ as regards obstruction or denial of access of
political or civil rights. courts;
b) gross deficiency in the
★ Bases of Grant of Rights administration of judicial or
a) Principle of Reciprocity remedial process;
b) MFN treatment c) failure to provide those
c) Nationality treatment – equality guarantees usually considered
between nationals and aliens in certain indispensable to the proper
matters. administration of justice; or
d) 1948 UDHR and other treaties d) a manifestly unjust
A State is under obligation to make reparation to Why is there no denial of justice unless
another State for the failure to fulfill its primary misconduct is extremely gross? – The reason is
obligation to afford, in accordance with that the independence of the courts is an
international law, the proper protection due to an accepted canon of democratic government, and
alien who is a national of the latter State. the law does not lightly hold a State responsible
for error committed by the courts.
Rule: A State is responsible for the maintenance
of law and order within its territory. Minimum International Standard (MIS)
Exception: If the injury is not directly NO PRECISE DEFINITION
attributable to the receiving State and when it The treatment of an alien, in order to constitute
was proximately caused by the alien himself. an international delinquency, should amount to an
outrage, to bad faith, to willful neglect of duty or
★ When acts of violence occur therein, it may to an insufficiency of governmental action so far
be said that the State is indirectly short of international standards that every
responsible; on the other hand, the State reasonable and impartial man would readily
cannot be regarded as an absolute insurer of recognize its insufficiency. NEER’S CASE, US-
the morality and behavior of all persons MEXICAN CLAIMS COMMISSION
within its jurisdiction.
Expropriation of Foreign-Owned Property
Q: Is the State liable for death and injury to Western countries maintain that MIS requires:
aliens? a) expropriation must be for a public
A: NO, unless it participates directly or is remiss purpose;
or negligent in taking measures to prevent injury,

b) it must be accompanied by payment of convention in force, a third State shall, of the

compensation for the full value of the nationalities which any such person possesses, Notes:
property that is prompt, adequate and recognize exclusively in its territory either the
effective. nationality of the country in which he is habitually
and principally resident or the nationality of the
★ Communist countries, however, country with which in the circumstances he
maintain that States may expropriate the appears to be in fact most closely connected.
means of production, distribution and (Frivaldo v. COMELEC, 174 SCRA 245, June 23,
exchange without paying compensation. 1989)

★ Developing countries, hoping to Non-Refoulement Principle

attract foreign investments, are inclined to Non-refoulement is a principle in international
accept Western view. law, specifically refugee law, that concerns the
protection of refugees from being returned to
CONDITIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CLAIMS places where their lives or freedoms could be
1) nationality claim threatened. Unlike political asylum, which applies
2) exhaustion of local remedies to those who can prove a well-grounded fear of
3) no waiver persecution based on membership in a social
4) no reasonable delay in filing the claim group or class of persons, non-refoulement refers
5) no improper behavior by injured alien to the generic repatriation of people, generally
refugees into war zones and other disaster areas.
Nationality of claim
In asserting the claims of its nationals, by An example of the non-refoulement principle can
resorting to diplomatic actions on his behalf, the be found in the 2007 issue of Israel jailing 320
State is in reality asserting its own right. It is the refugees from the Darfur conflict in Western
bond of nationality between the state and the Sudan. Due to laws erected for the protection of
individual which confers upon the State the right Israel from the anti-Semitic atmosphere in the
of diplomatic protection. region, refugees fleeing to Israel in avoidance of
the Darfur conflict were jailed in the interest of
Doctrine of Genuine Link national security. After some 200 were
The bond of nationality must be real and effective determined to not be a threat, usual repatriation
in order that a State may claim a person as its guidelines could not be followed in part due to
national for the purpose of affording him non-refoulement principles. Many of them were
diplomatic protection. NOTTEBOHN CASE 1955 released to Israeli collective farms called
ICJ * kibbutzim and moshavim to work until the
conflict subsides enough for their return. (Source:
Doctrine of Effective Nationality Wikipedia)
When a person who has more than one nationality
is within a third State, he shall be treated as if
had only one – either the nationality of the FRIVALDO v. COMELEC
country which he is habitually and principally a 174 SCRA 245, 23 June 1989
resident or the nationality of the country with
which in the circumstances he appears to be most
The Nottobohm Case is not relevant in the
closely connected – without prejudice to the
petition before us because it dealt with a conflict
application of its (3rd State’s) law in matters of
between the nationality laws of two states as
personal status and of any convention in force.
decided by a third State. No third State is
involved in the case at bar, in fact, even the US is
not claiming Frivaldo as its national. The sole
☀ These
question presented to us is WON Frivaldo is a
two doctrines are used interchangeably
citizen of the Philipines under our own laws,
by authors and commentators without
regardless of other nationality laws. We can
any effort to make a distinction between
decide this question alone as sovereign of our own
the two. It may be treated alike.
territory, conformable the Sec. 1 of the Hague
Convention (1903) which provides: “it is for each
Q: What is the “doctrine of effective
State to determine under its laws who are its
nationality” (genuine link doctrine)?
Held: This principle is expressed in Article 5 of
the Hague Convention of 1930 on the Conflict of
Nationality Laws as follows: 3 Modes of Acquiring Nationality
1) Birth
Art. 5. Within a third State a person having more a. jus sanguinis (by blood)
than one nationality shall be treated as if he had b. jus soli (by place)
only one. Without prejudice to the application of
its law in matters of personal status and of any 2) Naturalization
a. naturalization proceedings

b. marriage A: Insofar as it requires alien to exhaust the

c. legitimation remedies available in the local state, it may Notes:
d. option be enforced as a lawful stipulation.
e. acquisition of domicile However, it may not be interpreted to
f. appointment as deprive the alien’s state of the right to
government official protect or vindicate his interests in case they
are injured by local state.
3) Resumption or Repatriation –
recovery of the original nationality upon No improper behavior by injured alien.
fulfillment of certain conditions. He who comes to court for redress must come
with clean hands.
5 Modes of Losing Nationality
1) Release Methods of Pressing Claims
2) Deprivation 1) Diplomatic Intervention
3) Expiration 2) International judicial settlement – The ICJ is
4) Renunciation authorized to assume jurisdiction to determine
5) Substitution “the nature or extent of the reparation to be
made for the breach of an international
§1, AIV, 1987 Phil. Constitution obligation,” but only after the State-parties agree
The following are citizens of the Philippines: thereto.
1) Those who are citizens of the Philippines at
the time of the adoption of the Constitution; What is the International standard of justice?
2) Those whose fathers or mothers are citizens It is defined as the standard of the reasonable
of the Philippines; state and calls for compliance with the ordinary
3) Those who elect Philippine citizenship norms of official conduct observed in civilized
pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution jurisdictions. It may refer to the intrinsic validity
of 1935; of the laws passed by the state or to the manner
4) Those who are naturalized in accordance with in which such laws are administered and
law. enforced.

Exhaustion of Local Remedies For example, a law imposing death penalty for a
Rule: The alien himself must have first exhausted petty theft would fall short of the international
the remedies provided by the municipal law, if standard. So to would one calling for the arbitrary
there be any. punishment of accused persons without
compliance with the usual requisites of due
Exceptions: process.
a) When the injury is inflicted directly
by the State such as when its diplomats are Nature and Measure of Damages
attacked. Reparation may consist of restitution:
b) When there are no remedies to a) in kind
exhaust; b) specific performance
c) The application for remedies would c) apology
result in no redress. d) punishment of the guilty
e) pecuniary compensation
No waiver f) or the combination of the above
The claim belongs to the State and not to the
individual. Thus, waiver of individual does not Measure – estimate of the loss caused to the
preclude the State to pursue the claim. injured individual, or, if he has lost his life, on
the loss caused by the death to his dependents.
Named after an Argentinean lawyer and Q: What is the principle of attribution? (1992
statesman who invented it stipulating that Bar)
the alien agrees in advance not to seek A: The acts of private citizens or groups cannot
diplomatic intervention. themselves constitute a violation by the
Philippines if said acts cannot be legally
☀ disreg attributed to the Philippines as a State.
arded by international arbitral tribunals
because the alien cannot waive a claim Q: In a raid conducted by rebels in a Cambodian
that does not belong to him but to his town, an American businessman who has been a
government. long-time resident of the place was caught by
the rebels and robbed of his cash and other
valuable personal belongings. Within minutes
Q: Is the Calvo clause lawful? two truckloads of government troops arrived
prompting the rebels to withdraw. Government

troopers immediately launched pursuit because disputes are matters for objective
operations and killed several rebels. No cash or determination. Notes:
other valuable property taken from the
American businessman was recovered. International Dispute – if the dispute arises
between two or more States.
In an action for indemnity filed by the US
Government in behalf of the businessman for ▪ The charging of one State and the denial of
injuries and losses in cash and property, the another of the dispute as charged, creates
Cambodian Government contended that under an international dispute as “there has thus
International Law it was not responsible for acts arisen a situation in which the two sides hold
of the rebels. clearly opposite views concerning the
questions of the performance or non-
1. Is the contention of the Cambodian performance of their treaty obligations.
Government correct? Explain. Confronted with such a situation, the Court
2. Suppose the rebellion is successful and a new must conclude that international disputes
government gained control of the entire State, have arisen.” ICJ Reports 1950
replacing the lawful Government that was
toppled, may the new government be held Legal Dispute – the following are deemed
responsible for the injuries or losses suffered by constitutive of a legal dispute:
the American businessman? Explain. (1995 Bar) i. interpretation of a treaty;
A: 1. YES. Unless it clearly appears that the ii. any question of international law;
Cambodian government has failed to use promptly iii. the existence of any fact which, if
and with appropriate force its constituted established, would constitute a breach of
authority, it can not be held responsible for the an international obligation;
acts of the rebels for the rebels are not their iv. the nature or extent of the reparation to
agents and their acts were done without its be made for the breach of an
volition. In this case, the government troopers international obligation.
immediately pursued the rebels and killed several
of them. Dispute v. Situation
2. YES. Victorious rebel movements are A dispute can properly be considered as a
responsible for the illegal acts of their forces n disagreement on a matter at issue between two
the course of the rebellion. The acts of the rebels or more States which has reached a stage at
are imputable to them when they assume as duly which the parties have formulated claims and
constituted authorities of the State. counterclaims sufficiently definite to be passed
upon by a court or other body set up for the
purpose of pacific settlement. A situation, by
Pacific Settlement of International Disputes contrast, is a state of affairs which has not yet
assumed the nature of conflict between the
Nature parties but which may, though not necessarily,
International Dispute Defined come to have that character.
Optional Clause
Types Optional Clause
2. Good Offices The following are deemed legal disputes:
3. Mediation 1. Interpretation of a treaty;
4. Enquiry 2. Any question of international law;
5. Conciliation 3. The existence of any fact which, if
6. Arbitration established, would constitute a breach of
7. Judicial Settlement an international obligation; and
4. The nature or extent of the reparation to
¯°º°¯ be made for the breach of an
international obligation.
It is well established in international law that no TYPES OF Pacific Settlement
State can, without its consent, be compelled to I. Negotiation
submit its disputes with other States either to The legal and orderly administrative process by
mediation or arbitration, or to any other kind of which governments, in the exercise of their
pacific settlement (PS). (PCIJ on STATUS OF unquestionable powers, conduct their relations
EASTERN CARELIA.) with one another and discuss, adjust and settle
their differences.
Dispute – is a disagreement on a point of law or The chief and most common method of settling
fact, a conflict of legal views or interests between international disputes. By this method, the
two persons. The mere denial of the existence of parties seek a solution of their differences by
a dispute does not prove its non-existence

direct exchange of views between themselves. VI. Arbitration

This is the very essence of diplomacy. This is a procedure for the settlement of disputes Notes:
between States by a binding award on the basis of
II. Good Offices law and as the result of an undertaking voluntarily
An attempt of a third party to bring together the accepted.
disputing States to effect a settlement of their
disputes. This is NOT to be regarded as an ☀ Princ
unfriendly act. iple of Free Determination – this
principle applies to the competence of
Tender of good office the arbitral tribunal, the law to be
A tender of good office may be made by: applied and the procedure to be
a) Third State followed.
b) international organs such as the UN;
c) Individuals or eminent citizens of a ☀ Choic
third State. e of Arbitrators – the arbitrators should
be either freely selected by the parties
III. Mediation or, at least, the parties should have been
This is the action of a third party in bringing the given the opportunity of a free choice of
parties to a dispute together and helping them in arbitrators.
a more or less informal way to find a basis for the
settlement of their dispute. ☀ States
are under no legal obligation to arbitrate
Mediation v. Good Offices their disputes.
In good offices, once the parties have been
brought together, the third party tendering ☀ comp
good offices has no further functions to romis d’ arbitrage – the agreement to
perform. In mediation, on the other hand, arbitrate. It is the charter of the arbitral
the third party mediates and is the more tribunal. Contains the following:
active one, for he proposes solution, offers a) the questions to be settled;
his advice and in general attempts to b) the method of selecting arbitrators
conciliate differences. and their number;
c) venue;
IV. Enquiry d) expenses;
Enquiry is the establishment of the facts involved e) the arbitral award;
in a dispute and the clarification of the issues in f) rules of procedure; and
order that their elucidation might contribute to g) the law to be applied.
its settlement.
VII. Judicial Settlement
▪ Basis – it rests on the theory that certain This means settlement by a permanent
disputes could be settled if the facts of the international court of justice, in accordance with
case were established. judicial methods. Arbitration proceedings may be
similar to the functions and process of judicial
▪ Object of Enquiry - to ascertain the facts settlement but the arbitral tribunal is NOT a
underlying a dispute and thereby prepare the permanent body as compared to the body referred
way for a negotiated adjustment or to in this type of PS.
settlement of the dispute.

V. Conciliation Forcible Measures Short of War

This is the process of settling disputes by referring
them to commissions or other international Severance of Diplomatic Relations
bodies, usually consisting of persons designated by Retorsion
agreement between the parties to the conflict, Reprisals
whose task is to elucidate the facts and make a Embargo
report containing proposals, for a settlement, Boycott
which, however, have no binding character. Non-intercourse
OPPENHEIM Pacific Blockade
Collective Measures under the Charter
▪ Conciliation v. Enquiry – in enquiry, the
main object is to establish the facts. In ¯°º°¯
conciliation, the main object is not only to
elucidate the facts but to bring the parties to I. Severance of Diplomatic Relations
an agreement. Severance may take place:

a) to mark severe reprisals and the State against whom

disapproval of a State’s conduct; such acts are directed. Notes:
b) to influence the
offending State to remedy the b) Reprisal taken by belligerents in the
consequences of some unfriendly or course of war – the purpose of the latter
illegal act; kind of reprisals is to compel a
c) to serve notice on belligerent to observe or desist from
the other State that the issue between violating the laws of warfare; it
them has reached a point where normal presupposes, therefore, the existence of
diplomatic intercourse is no longer a state of war between the parties
possible and that sterner measures might concerned.
possibly follow. Reprisals Retorsion
Consists of acts which Consists of retaliatory
Suspension of Relations– has been used to would ordinarily be conduct which is
denote a less drastic step than complete illegal. legitimate or is not in
severance of diplomatic ties. It involves violation of
withdrawal of diplomatic representation, but international law.
not the severance of consular relations.
Generally resorted to Acts which give rise to
by a State in retorsion though
No breach in int’l. law – there exists no
consequence of an obnoxious do not
obligation to maintain diplomatic intercourse
act or omission of amount to an
with other States, thus, severance of an
another State which international
existing relation does not tantamount to
under international delinquency.
breach of international law.
law constitutes an
II. Retorsion
Consists of an unfriendly, but not international
illegal act of one State against another in
Forms of Reprisals
retaliation for the latter’s unfriendly or
a) military occupation
inequitable conduct. It does not involve the use
b) display of force
of force.
c) naval bombardment
d) seizure of ships at sea
States resorting to retorsion retaliate by acts of
e) seizure of properties of nationals of the
the same or similar kind as those complained of.
delinquent State
It is resorted to by States usually in cases of unfair
f) freezing of assets of its citizens
treatment of their citizens abroad.
g) embargo
h) boycott
III. Reprisals
i) pacific blockade
Any kind of forcible or coercive measures whereby
one State seeks to exercise a deterrent effect or
Letters Of Marque or Special Reprisals
to obtain redress or satisfaction, directly or
Act of a State granting their subjects who
indirectly, for the consequences of the illegal acts
could not obtain redress for injury suffered
of another State, which has refused to make
abroad, authorizing them to perform acts of
amends for such illegal conduct.
self-help against the offending State or its
nationals for the purpose of obtaining
Criteria for Legitimacy
satisfaction for the wrong sustained.
a) that the State against which
reprisals are taken must have been guilty
of a breach of international law;
IV. Embargo (Sequestration / Hostile Embargo)
b) that prior to recourse to This is originally a form of reprisal consisting of
reprisals an adequate attempt must have forcible detention of the vessels of the offending
been made, without success, to obtain State or of its nationals which happened to be
redress from the delinquents State for lying in the ports of the injured or aggrieved
the consequences of its illegal conduct; State. Later, the practice was extended to such
and vessels also as were seized in the high seas, or
c) That acts of reprisals must even within the territorial waters of the offending
not be excessive. State.

2 Kinds of Reprisals: ☀ Vessels sequestered are not considered

a) Reprisal as a form of self-help – is condemned or confiscated, but must be
resorted to for the purpose of settling a returned when the delinquent State
dispute or redressing a grievance without makes the necessary reparation.
going to war, consequently no state of
war exists between the State resorting to Civic or Pacific Embargo

A form of embargo employed by a State to its “threat to peace, a breach of the peace, or an act
own vessels within its national domain or of of aggression.” Notes:
resources which otherwise might find their
way into foreign territory. Article 41, UN Charter
The SC may decide what measures not involving
Collective Embargo the use of armed forces are to be employed to
Embargo by a group of States directed against give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon
an offending State. This may be: the Members of the UN to apply such measures.
a) collective embargo on import or export These may include complete or partial
of narcotic drugs interruption of:
b) collective embargo by way of a) economic relations and of rail, sea, air,
enforcement action under the UN Charter postal, telegraphic, radio, and other
means of communication; and
V. Boycott b) severance to the diplomatic relations.
A comparatively modern form of reprisal which
consists of a concerted suspension of trade and
business relations with the nationals of the Article 42, UN Charter
offending State. Should the SC consider that measures provided for
in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved
VI. Non-intercourse to be inadequate, it may take such action by air,
Consists of suspension of ALL commercial sea, or land forces as may be necessary to
intercourse with a State. A complete or partial maintain or restore international peace and
interruption of economic relations with the security. Such action may include:
offending State as a form of enforcement a) demonstrations
measure. b) blockade and
c) other operations by air, sea, or land
VII. Pacific Blockade forces of Members of the UN.
A naval operation carried out in time of peace
whereby a State prevents access to or exit from
particular ports or portions of the coast of
The Laws of War
another State for the purpose of compelling the
latter to yield to certain demands made upon it
by the blockading State. Definition of War
Legality of War
☀ Third States do not acquire the status of Rules of Warfare
neutrals because there is no belligerency Sanctions of the Laws of War
between the blockader and the State. Commencement and Termination of War
Effects of Outbreak of War
Quarantine [See movie “Thirteen Days”] Conduct of Warfare
The right to stop and search vessels of third
States suspected of carrying specified cargo ¯°º°¯
to the “quarantined” State has been asserted
by the blockading State. THE CUBAN War INGRID DETTER DE LUPIS
QUARANTINE. A sustained struggle by armed forces of a certain
intensity between groups of certain size,
☀ Blockade may no longer be consisting of individuals who are armed, who wear
resorted to by States Members as a distinctive insignia and who are subjected to
measure of self-help. It may only be military discipline under responsible command.
used collectively by or on behalf of the
UN as an enforcement action under Legality of War under UN
Article 41 of the UN Charter. The use of armed force is allowed under the UN
Charter only in case of individual or collective
self-defense, or in pursuance of a decision or
recommendation of the SC to take forcible action
VIII. Collective Measures under the Charter against an aggressor.
A system of peace enforcement under the UN
Charter. It envisages the employment, if As Self-Defense – the use of force in self-defense
necessary, of compulsive measures to maintain or is permitted only while the SC has not taken the
restore peace. These measures may or may not necessary measures to maintain or restore
involve the use of armed forces. international peace and security.

The enforcement provisions of the Charter are ★ The laws of war are not
brought into play only in the event that the SC applicable to war alone in its technical
determines, under Article 39, that there exists a sense, but to all armed conflicts.

Nature of Enforcement Action under UN a) a declaration of war giving reasons;

UN Forces must behave in a manner consistent b) an ultimatum with a conditional Notes:
with the purposes and ideals of the Organization declaration of war.
and must obey the rules of war which represent a
general international attempt to humanize armed animo belligerendi
conflict. From the point of view of international law,
war commences upon the commission of an
Temperamenta of Warfare act of force by one party done in animo
Grotius advocated moderation in the conduct of belligerendi. War
hostilities for reasons of humanity, religion and
farsighted policy. Anglo-American Rule
Bound by a statement by the executive as to
Rules of War Obsolete when a state of war is commenced.
The radical change in the character of war, both
in scope and method, has rendered many of the Q: What are some kinds of non-hostile
traditional rules of warfare obsolete, or at any intercourse between the belligerents?
rate frightfully inadequate. A: Among the kinds of non-hostile intercourse are
flags of truce, cartels, passports, safe-conduct,
Sanctions of the laws of war safeguards and license to trade.
Observance of the rules of warfare by belligerents
is secured through several means recognized by Q: By what agreements may hostilities be
international law: suspended between the belligerents?
1) reprisals A: Hostilities may be superceded by a suspension
2) punishment of war crimes committed by of arms, an armistice, a cease-fire, a truce, or a
enemy soldiers and other enemy subjects capitulation.
3) protest lodged with the neutral powers
4) compensation Suspension of Arms
It is the temporary cessation of hostilities by
☀ The taking of hostages, formerly agreement of the local commanders for such
considered a legitimate means of purposes as the gathering of the wounded and the
enforcing observance of the laws of burial of the dead.
war, is no longer permitted at
present time. ARMISTICE
It is the suspension of all hostilities within a
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) certain area (local) or in the entire region of the
These are the laws of armed conflict. It used to war (general) agreed upon by the belligerent
be called the laws of war. governments, usually for the purpose of arranging
It regulates the conduct of actual conflict (jus terms of peace.
in bello) as distinguished from laws providing for
the instances of the lawful resort to force (jus ad CEASEFIRE
bellum). It is the unconditioned stoppage of hostilities by
It is a functional and utilitarian body of laws, order of an international body like the Security
not just humanitarian. Council for the purpose of employing peaceful
It is part of International Criminal Law and means of settling the conflict.
deals with breaches of international rules on the
laws of armed conflict entailing the personal TRUCE
liability of the individuals concerned, as opposed Sometimes use interchangeably with armistice,
to the responsibility of the State which is covered but is now understood to refer to a ceasefire with
by Public International Law proper. (IHL: A Field conditions attached.
Guide to the Basics, The 2007 Metrobank Lecture
on International Law, 22 Nov. 2007 by Associate CAPITULATION
Justice Adolfo S. Azcuna) It is the surrender of military troops, forts or
districts in accordance with the rules of military
☀ It was customary to notify an intended war by TERMINATION
letters of defiance, herald, or preliminary a) by simple cessation of hostilities, without
warning by declaration or ultimatum. the conclusion of a formal treaty of
peace – since no formal treaty of peace is
☀ 1907 2nd Hague Conference – The contracting concluded, the problems concerning
States recognized that hostilities between ownership of property which have
them ought not to commence without changed hands during the course of the
previous and unequivocal warning which war are generally settled by the
might take the form of either: application of the rule of uti possidetis.

allowed to be performed by the military

b) by a treaty of peace – this is the usual occupant, hence, the ownership of the Notes:
method of terminating war. It may be a property reverts back after the military
negotiated peace treaty. Or a peace occupancy without payment of compensation.
treaty thru a dictated treaty.
Q: When is the principle of postliminium
c) by unilateral declaration – if the war applied? (1979 Bar)
results in the complete defeat or A: Where the territory of one belligerent state is
unconditional surrender of a belligerent occupied by the enemy during war, the legitimate
the formal end of the war depends on government is ousted from authority. When the
the decision of the victor. belligerent occupation ceases to be effective, the
authority of the legitimate government is
uti possidetis automatically restored, together with all its laws,
Each belligerent is regarded as legally by virtue of the jus postliminium.
entitled to such property as are actually in its
possession at the time hostilities ceased. EFFECTS OF WAR OUTBREAK
1. Rupture of diplomatic
status quo ante bellum relations and termination of consular
Each of the belligerents is entitled to the activities
territory and property which it HAD 2. On enemy persons
possession of at the commencement of the 3. On enemy properties
war. 4. On trading and intercourse
Dictated Treaty 5. On contracts
This happens where the decisive victory of 6. On treaties
one of the belligerents leads it to impose its
will on the other. Imposed by the victor. Rupture of diplomatic relations / termination of
consular activities
End of War NAVARRO VS. BARREDO The respective diplomatic envoys are allowed to
Termination of war when used in private leave for their home countries. War also brings
contracts refers to the formal proclamation about the cessation of consular activity. The
of peace by the US and not the cessation of official residence of the envoy, the archives of
hostilities between RP and Japan during the the mission, and consular archives are usually left
WWII. under the protection of another foreign envoy or
consul of another State.
Q: What is the meaning or concept of uti
possidetis? (1977 Bar) On enemy persons
A: The problem concerning ownership of property International law leaves each belligerent free,
which have changed hands during the course of within wide limits, to designate the persons whom
the war are generally settled by the application of it will treat as having enemy character.
the rule of uti possidetis, by which each
belligerent is regarded as legally entitled to such Determination of enemy character
property as are actually in its possession at the a) territorial test – enemy character
time hostilities ceased. depends on the residence or domicile of
the person concerned
Postliminium (See movie: “The Gladiator”)
A term borrowed from Roman Law concept which b) nationality test – this is the preferred
meant that persons or properties captured or continental practice. The subjects of the
seized and taken beyond (post) the boundary belligerent are deemed enemy persons
(limen) could be enslaved or appropriated, but regardless of where they are.
upon return they recovered their former status.

Modern Practice c) activities test – whether national or not,

To denote the doctrine that territory, resident or not. Thus, subjects of a
individuals and property, after having come neutral State may be treated as enemies
under the authority of the enemy, revert to because of certain activities where they
the authority of the original sovereign ipso participate.
facto upon retaking possession.
d) territorial or commercial domicile test –
Legitimate Acts of Military Occupant in matters pertaining to economic
Postliminium has no effects upon the acts of warfare.
a military occupant during the occupation
which under international law it is competent e) controlling interest test – this is the test
to perform e.g. collection of ordinary taxes. as to corporations in addition to the
However, appropriation of property is not place of incorporation test. A

corporation is regarded as enemy person International law leaves each belligerent free to
if it: regulate this matter by his own domestic law. In Notes:
1) is incorporated in an enemy general, it may be stated that States treat as void
teriroty; or contracts which may give aid to the enemy or add
2) is controlled by individuals to his resources, or necessitate intercourse or
bearing enemy character. communication with enemy persons.

Rules for interment of enemy aliens On treaties

(1) to provide for the Modern view is that war does NOT ipso facto
internees’ safety and welfare; terminate all treaties between belligerents.
(2) to furnish adequate ☀ Treaties may contain provisions to the
food and clothing effect that it will remain in force
(3) to provide family notwithstanding the existence of war.
accommodations with due privacy and
facilities; ☀ Treaties dealing with political matters,
(4) to provide facilities such as treaties of alliance, and with
for religious, intellectual and physical commercial relations are deemed
activities; abrogated by the outbreak of war
(5) to permit the use of between the parties thereto.
their personal properties and financial
(6) to permit a degree of (See movie: “The Patriot”)
communication with the outside world; 3 Basic Principles of IHL:
(7) the refrain from 1. Military necessity
excessive or inhuman penal and 2. Humanity
disciplinary measures; 3. Chivalry
(8) to make transfers
only in a humane manner; Doctrine of Military Necessity
(9) to record and duly A belligerent is justified in resorting to all
certify deaths, and to inquire into deaths measures which are indispensable to bring
other than from natural causes; about the complete submission of the enemy,
(10) to release internees as soon as possible, by means of regulated
when the reasons for internment cease or violence not forbidden by conventional or
when hostilities terminate. 1949 customary rules of war and with the least
GENEVA CONVENTION possible loss of lives, time and money.

Locus standi during occupation Principle of Humanity

The practice of states are varied. Some [THE ETHICS OF WARFARE]
consider the enemy persons ex lege during Forbid the use of weapons which cause
the whole duration of the hostilities. Some indiscriminate destruction or injury or inflict
allowed them to sue and be sued subject to unnecessary pain or suffering.
so many exceptions. In the Philippines, when
an enemy subject is unable to sue during war, Principle of Chivalry
a right of action which has accrued to him This principle requires the belligerents to give
before the war is deemed suspended for the proper warning before launching a
duration of the war. Further, war suspends bombardment or prohibit the use of perfidy in
the operation of the statute of limitations. the conduct of hostilities. This principle does
not prohibit espionage.
On enemy property
In general, goods belonging to enemy persons are
considered enemy property. Q: Who constitute combatants?
• public – confiscated A: They are the following:
1) Regular Forces (RF)– the army, navy, and
• private – sequestered only and
air force. Non-combatant members of the
subject to return or reimbursement
armed forces include: chaplains, army
services and medical personnel.
On trading and intercourse
The practice of belligerents in modern wars of
2) Irregular Forces (IF) – also known as
forbidding by legislation all intercourse with alien
franc-tireurs consist of militia and voluntary
enemies, except as such as are permitted under
corps. They are treated as lawful combatants
license. The main object of such laws was to
provided that:
prohibit transactions which would benefit the
enemy or enemy persons.

On contracts

a) they are commanded by a Other Questionable weapons

person responsible for his 1) Fuel explosive weapons that kill by air Notes:
subordinates; shock waves
b) they wear a fixed distinctive 2) Flame blast munitions that combine fuel
sign recognizable for his air explosive effect with radiation in
subordinates; chemical fireball munitions;
c) they carry arms openly; and 3) Laser weapons which cause burns and
d) they conduct their operations in blindness
accordance with the laws and 4) Infrasound devices that cause damage to
customs of war. the central nervous system.

Guerilla warfare – considered as IF. LIMITATION ON TARGETS OF ATTACK

Hostilities conducted by armed bodies of men Only military targets are subject to attack by the
who do not form part of an organized army. armed forces of a belligerent as a basic rule of
warfare. Likewise, certain places and objectives
3) Non-privileged Combatants (NPC) – are not subject to attack, such as:
individuals who take up arms or commit
hostile acts against the enemy without 1) Neutralized areas or zones
belonging to the armed forces or forming part – these are zones in the theater of operations
of the irregular forces. If captured, they are established by special agreement between
not entitled to the status of prisoners of war. the belligerents for treatment of the
wounded and civilians.
Mercenaries – considered as NPC EX: Aland Islands, the Spitzbergen, the
Those who, having been recruited in another Magellan Straits, the Suez Canal and Panama
country, from military forces for “personal Canal.
gain,” are not covered by protection.
2) Open towns – also known as
Spies – A soldier employing false pretenses or “non defended locality.” A place free of
acts through clandestine means to gather combatants.
information from the enemy. A soldier not
wearing uniform during hostilities runs the 3) Cultural property and
risk of being treated as a spy and not entitled places of worship
to prisoner of war status. When caught, they
are not to be regarded as prisoners of war.
Military Scouts are not spies. 4) Civil defense – includes
personnel, buildings and assets, clearly
4) Levee en masse indicated by a blue triangle on an orange
Takes place when the population background distinctive sign.
spontaneously rises in mass to resist the
invader. They enjoy privileges due to 5) Dangerous installations –
armed forces. dams, dikes, or nuclear electric plants.

NOTE: Only RF, IF and Levee may be treated as 6) Civilians and persons hors
prisoners of war under Protocol I of 1977. See de combat – persons hors de combat are
this reviewer’s section on POW. those who are either wounded or, for other
reasons, have permanently joined the civilian
Restrictions on weapons population.
Prohibited weapons:
1) explosive bullets
2) use of dum-dum bullets
7) Parachutists – those who
3) employment of projectiles bail out from aircrafts in distress. Must only
whose only object is diffusion of asphyxiating, be treated as POW.
poisonous, or other gases, and all analogous
liquids, materials or devices 8) Hospitals, hospital ships
4) the use of bacteriological and medical units – a clear marking or a Red
methods of warfare. Cross to show their status.
5) The laying of “contact” mines
6) Explosives from balloons 9) Food supplies and crops

3 Protocols on Restrictions FORBIDDEN METHODS

Protocol I on Fragmentation Weapons No Quarter – such orders implying that no
Protocol II on Treacherous Weapons survivors are to be left after an attack.
Protocol III on Incendiary Weapons

international law sources and from the Geneva

Reprisals – are not reprisals as a form of self- Conventions of 1949 and other treaties to which Notes:
help, instead, belligerent reprisals are of we are parties. (IHL: A Field Guide to the Basics,
a completely different type. These are The 2007 Metrobank Lecture on International
acts of vengeance by a belligerent Law, 22 Nov. 2007 by Associate Justice Adolfo S.
directed against groups of civilians or Azcuna)
POWs in retaliation of or response to an
attack by other civilians against the 1949 Geneva Convention III
belligerent. The rules of POW applies to prisoners of war who
are captured in a properly declared war or any
Perfidy on treachery – this includes: other kind of “armed conflict,” even if any of the
a) Improper use of white flag combatant powers do not recognize the existence
b) Feigning surrender or pretending of a state of war and even though these conflicts
to have been wounded or to have a are “not of an international character.”
civilian status
c) Using the uniform of the enemy Q: Is guerilla warfare recognized under
d) Claiming neutral status International Law and may a captured guerilla
e) Falsely flying the Red Cross flag demand treatment afforded a prisoner of war
f) Making hospitals, churches and under the 1949 Geneva Convention? Explain.
the like as shield from attack. A: Yes. Under Article 4 of the 1949 Geneva
g) Area bombing Convention on Prisoners of War, guerilla warfare,
which consists in hostilities conducted in territory
occupied by the enemy by armed bodies of men
PRISONERS OF WAR (POW) who do not form part of an organized army, is
The following persons captured must be treated recognized. Guerillas are entitled to be treated
as POW: as prisoners of war provided they fulfill the
1) members of the armed forces, as well as following conditions:
members of militias or volunteer corps 1) They are commanded by a person
forming part of such armed forces; responsible for his subordinates;
2) members of other militias or volunteer 2) They have a fixed distinctive emblem
groups, including those of organized recognizable at a distance;
resistance movements, subject to compliance 3) They carry arms openly; and
with certain conditions; 4) They conduct their operations in
3) members of regular armed forces professing accordance with the laws and custom of
allegiance to a government or an authority war. (1982 Bar)
not recognized by the capturing State;
4) various categories of persons accompanying
an army unit, such as civilian members of When POW should be returned
military aircraft crew, war correspondents, Upon cessation of war or hostilities. However,
etc., provided they are authorized to be with POWs facing criminal trial may be detained until
the army or unit; the termination of the proceedings or
5) members of the crew of merchant vessels and punishment.
civilian aircraft who do not benefit by more
favorable treatment under any other When is a Territory Deemed Under
provisions of internal law; Military Occupation?
6) members of the population of non-occupied Territory is deemed to be occupied when it is
territory who take up arms as a levee en placed as a matter of fact under the authority of
masse against an invading army. the hostile army.

Q: What are the core crimes in IHL? TAN SE CHIANG v. DIRECTOR OF POSTS
A: The core crimes in IHL are genocide, crimes
against humanity, war crimes and aggression. Belligerent occupation becomes an accomplished
These core crimes are specified in the Statues fact the moment the government of the invaded
of the ICC (or the Rome Statute for an ICC) which territory is rendered incapable of publicly
describes them as the most serious crimes of exercising its authority and the invader is in a
concern to the international community as a position to substitute and has substituted his own
whole. These crimes are within the jurisdiction of authority for that of the legitimate government of
the ICC. the occupied territory.
NOTE: Although the Philippines has signed but not
NOTE: Belligerent occupation is different from
yet ratified the Rome Statute establishing the ICC,
the ICC Statute’s and definitions of the core Military occupation.
crimes are authoritative statements for us since
they are practically lifted from customary Rights & Duties of a Belligerent Occupant

to continue orderly government Neutrality vs. Neutralization (1988 Bar)

to exercise control over the occupied Neutrality Neutralization Notes:
territory and its inhabitants. Obtains only during war A condition that
applies in peace and
NOTE: The belligerent occupant cannot compel war
the inhabitants to swear allegiance to him. A status created under A status created by
international law, by means of a treaty
CO KIM CHAN V. VALDEZ TAN KEH means of a stand on the
75 Phil 371 part of a state not to
side with any of the
parties at war
His rights over the occupied territory are merely
that of administration; hence he cannot, while Brought about by a Cannot be effected by
the war continues, annex the territory or set it up unilateral declaration unilateral act only but
as an independent State. by neutral state must be recognized by
other states.
Q: Can the belligerent occupant impose and
Q: Switzerland and Austria are outstanding
collect taxes or contributions?
examples of neutralized states. What are the
A: YES. Under the Hague Regulations, the
characteristics of neutralized states? (1988 Bar)
occupant is empowered to collect taxes, dues and
A: Whether simple or composite, a state is said
tolls, as far as possible in accordance with “the
to be neutralized where its independence and
rules of assessment and incidence in force,” and
integrity are guaranteed by an international
he is bound to defray the “expenses of
convention on the condition that such state
administration” out of the proceeds.
obligates itself never to take up arms against any
other state, except for self-defense, or enter into
Contributions – are money impositions on the
such international obligations as would indirectly
inhabitants over and above such taxes.
involve it in war. A state seeks neutralization
where it is weak and does not wish to take an
Conditions on levying taxes:
active part in international politics. The power
1) they must be for the needs of the army or
that guarantees its neutralization may be
local administration;
motivated either by balance of power
2) they can be imposed by written order of the
considerations or by desire to make the state a
Commander-in-Chief only, in
buffer between the territories of the great
contradistinction to requisitions which may
be demanded by the Commander in a
Rights and Duties of Neutrals & Belligerents
3) a receipt must be given to each contributor;
The nature of their rights are correlative, that is,
4) the levy must be made as far as possible, in
a right of a neutral gives rise to a corresponding
accordance with the rules in existence and
duty on the part of the belligerents, and a right of
the assessment in force for taxes.
a belligerent corresponds to a duty of the neutral.
1) duty of abstention (negative) – should
not give assistance, direct or indirect, to
Neutrality Defined
either belligerent in their war efforts.
Neutrality v. Neutralization
Rights and Duties of Neutrals and Belligerents
Passage of Belligerent Warships 2) duty of prevention (positive) – places
Prohibition of Warlike Activities in Neutral the neutral State under obligation to
Territory prevent its territory from becoming a
Neutral Asylum to Land and Naval Forces of base for hostile operations by one
Belligerent belligerent against the other.
Right of Angary
Blockade 3) duty of acquiescence (passive) –
Contraband requires a neutral to submit to acts of
Unneutral Service belligerents with respect to the
Right of Visitation commerce of its nationals if such acts are
warranted under the law of nations.
An attitude of impartiality adopted by third PASSAGE OF BELLIGERENT WARSHIPS
States towards belligerents and recognized by the A neutral State may allow passage of belligerent
belligerents, such attitude creating rights and warships through the maritime belt forming part
duties between the impartial States and the of its territorial waters. What is prohibited is the
belligerents. passage upon its national rivers or canals. The
exception, however, are the canals which have

become international waterways (such as the Suez A right of a belligerent to requisition and use,
Canal and the Panama Canal). subject to certain conditions, or even to destroy Notes:
in case of necessity, neutral property found in its
PROHIBITION OF WARLIKE ACTIVITIES IN territory, in enemy territory or in the high seas.
The Hague Convention No. XIII provides that 3 Conditions
“belligerents are forbidden to use neutral ports a. there must be an
and waters as base of naval operations against urgent need for the property in
their adversaries.” Thus, a neutral must prevent connection with the offensive or
belligerent warships from cruising within its defensive war;
maritime belt for the purpose of capturing enemy b. the property is
vessels as soon as they leave it. within the territory or jurisdiction of the
In the event that a neutral port or roadstead is c. compensation must
used for repairs, the neutral state may allow it as be paid to the owner.
long as such repairs are absolutely necessary to
render them seaworthy, not repairs which would NOTE: A neutral subject within the territory of a
add in any way to their fighting force. Also, belligerent is not entitled to indemnity from
belligerent warships cannot take shelter in a either side against the loss of property occasioned
neutral port for any undue length of time in order by legitimate acts of war.
to evade capture. The maximum length of stay
permissible is 24 hours, unless the neutral state BLOCKADE
has prescribed otherwise in their municipal laws An operation of war carried out by belligerent
or unless the nature of repairs to be done or the seacraft or other means, for the purpose of
stress of weather would require a longer time. preventing ingress and egress of vessels or aircraft
of all nations to and from the enemy coast or any
Neutral ports may not become places of asylum or part thereof.
permanent rendezvous for belligerent prizes. The
rule is that a prize may not be brought into a
neutral port, except under certain circumstances. CONTRABAND
A term used to designate those goods which are
susceptible of use in war and declared to be
NEUTRAL ASYLUM TO LAND AND NAVAL FORCES contraband by a belligerent, and which are found
OF BELLIGERENT by that belligerent on its way to assist the war
POW’s who escape into neutral territory or are operations or war effort of the enemy. STONE
brought into neutral territory by enemy troops
who themselves take refuge there shall become Requisites:
free ipso facto, and the neutral State shall leave a) susceptible of use in war
such prisoners at liberty, but if it allows them to b) destined for the use of a belligerent in its
remain in its territory, it may assign them a place war effort.
of residence so as to prevent them from rejoining
their forces. Kinds of Contrabands
a) absolute – goods which by their very
As regards fugitive soldiers, the neutral State is nature are intended to be used in war.
not obliged to grant them asylum, although it is
not forbidden to do so. b) conditional – goods which by their nature
are not destined exclusively for use in
Belligerent aircraft and their personnel, if they war, but which are nevertheless of great
are compelled to land in neutral territory, must value to a belligerent in the prosecution
be interned. of the war. e.g. foodstuff, clothing, fuel,
horses, etc.
In case a belligerent men-of-war refuses to leave
neutral port in which it is not entitled to remain, Hostile destination
the neutral State concerned has the right to take In case of absolute contraband it is necessary only
such measures as it deems necessary to render to prove that the goods had as their destination
the ship incapable of putting to sea for the any point within enemy or enemy-controlled
duration of the war. When the belligerent ship is territory. In the case of conditional contraband,
detained by a neutral State, the officers and crew it is required that the goods be destined to the
are likewise interned, either in the ship itself or authorities or armed forces of the enemy. In
in another vessel or on land, and may be both, the destination as of moment of seizure is
subjected to such restrictions as may be critical.
Doctrine of continuous voyage
RIGHT OF ANGARY Goods which are destined to a neutral port cannot
be regarded as contraband of war.

The captured vessel and cargo, must be brought

before a Prize Court for trial. Notes:
Consequences of contraband carriage
Neutral States are not under obligation to prevent 
their subjects from carrying contraband to
belligerents. However, Neutral States have the END
duty to acquiesce in the suppression by
belligerents of trade in contraband.

Doctrine of Infection
Under the British and American practice, the
penalty for carriage of contraband would be
confiscation of the contraband cargo. Innocent
cargo belonging to the same owner would also be
subject to confiscation. Innocent cargo belonging
to another owner would be released, but without
compensation for delay and detention in the Prize

Doctrine of Ultimate Consumption

Goods intended for civilian use which may
ultimately find their way to and be consumed by
the belligerent forces are also liable to seizure on
the way.

Doctrine of Ultimate Destination

The liability of contraband to capture is
determined not by their ostensible but by their
real destination. Even if the vessel stops at an
intermediate neutral port, it will still be
considered as one continuous voyage provided it
can be shown that its cargo will ultimately be ACKNOWLEDGMENTS / ATTRIBUTIONS
delivered to a hostile destination.
Denotes carriage by neutral vessels of certain 2008. ALTHOUGH THIS IS MAINLY OUTLINED FOR
persons and dispatches for the enemy and also the PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW CLASS UNDER ATTY.
taking of direct part in the hostilities and doing a EDWIN REY SANDOVAL, THIS MATERIAL MAY ALSO
number of other acts for the enemy. A neutral BE OF GOOD USE UNDER OTHER PROFESSORS
vessel engaged in unneutral service may be HANDLING THE SAME SUBJECT AS WELL AS THOSE
captured by a belligerent and treated, in general, TAKING REVIEW SUBJECT ON POLITICAL AND
in the same way as neutral vessels captured for PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW.
carriage of contraband.
The right of belligerents (exercised only by men- SANDOVAL’S LECTURES AND CASES SUCH AS
of-war and military aircraft of belligerents) to SALONGA & YAP AND CRUZ.
visit and, if it be needed, to search neutral
merchantmen for the purpose of ascertaining WE ENCOURAGE THE FREE CIRCULATION OF THIS
whether they really belong to the merchant MATERIAL AMONGST THE RANKS OF STUDENTS,
marine of neutral States, and if this is found to be BARRISTERS, PROFESSORS, LAWYERS, LEGAL
the case, whether they are attempting to break ENTHUSIASTS AND THE LIKE.
blockade, carrying contraband or rendering
unneutral service. Only private or merchant WE SALUTE ATTY. SANDOVAL FOR HIS NEVER
vessels may be subjected to visit and search. FADING BRILLIANCE IN THE FIELD OF POLITICAL
Takes place if the cargo, or the vessel, or both,
are liable to confiscation, or if grave suspicion THIS IS PURELY FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES AND IS
requires further search which can only be STRICTLY NOT FOR SALE.
undertaken in a port.



Private clinics! however, continue to render family

planning counsel and devices to paying clients.
a. Is the Executive Order in any way Notes:
constitutionally infirm? Explain.
b. Is the Philippines in breach of any obligation
under international law? Explain.
c. May the Commission on Human Rights order
the Mayor to stop the implementation of the
Executive Order? Explain.

2007 BAR. The City Mayor issues an Executive Order

declaring that the city promotes responsible parenthood
and upholds natural family planning. He prohibits all
hospitals operated by the city from prescribing the use
of artificial methods of contraception, including
condoms, pills, intrauterine devices and surgical
sterilization. As a result, poor women in his city lost
their access to affordable family planning programs.



1. If owned by the owner of the vessel

- confiscated/condemned

2. If owned by a different owner

Breach of Blockade Confiscated or brought to a - shall be confiscated IF:
prize court a) it consists of contrabands; or
b) the owner knew that the goods
shipped is going to a blockaded point
and is going to be blockaded.

General Rule: Shall be Contraband cargo: confiscated.

confiscated and seized. Innocent cargo:
1. If owned by the owner of the vessel, it
Exception: When the cargo shall be confiscated (Doctrine of
Carriage of consists of both contrabands Infection).
Contraband and innocent goods, it (vessel)
may only be confiscated if the 2. If owned by a different person, it shall
contraband cargo is more not be confiscated but it shall be
than ½ of the total cargo by released without compensation due to
value, weight, volume and the delay of release and detention in
freight. the Prize Court.

Performance of Same as in Carriage of Same as in Carriage of Contrabands

Unneutral Service Contrabands
2007 BAR. Lawrence is a Filipino computer expert based in Manila who invented a virus that destroys all the files
stored in a computer. Assume that in May 2005, this virus spread all over the world and caused $50 million in damage
to property in the United States, and that in June 2005, he was criminally charged before United States courts under
their anti-hacker law. Assume that in July 2005, the Philippines adopted its own anti-hacker law, to strengthen
existing sanctions already provided against damage to property. The United States has requested the Philippines to
extradite him to US courts under the RP-US Extradition Treaty.

a. Is the Philippines under an obligation to extradite Lawrence? State the applicable rule and its rationale.
b. Assume that the extradition request was made after the Philippines adopted its anti-hacker legislation. Will
that change your answer?

2007 BAR. In 1993, historians confirmed that during World War II, "comfort women" were forced into serving the
Japanese military. These women were either abducted or lured by false promises of jobs as cooks or waitresses, and
eventually forced against their will to have sex with Japanese soldiers on a daily basis during the course of the war,
and often suffered from severe beatings and venereal diseases. The Japanese government contends that the "comfort
stations" were run as "onsite military brothels" (or prostitution houses) by private operators, and not by the Japanese
military. There were many Filipina "comfort women."

a. Name at least one basic principle or norm of international humanitarian law that was violated by the
Japanese military in the treatment of the "comfort women."
b. The surviving Filipina "comfort women" demand that the Japanese government apologize and pay them
compensation. However, under the 1951 San Francisco Peace Agreement -the legal instrument that ended
the state of war between Japan and the Allied Forces -all the injured states, including the Philippines,
received war reparations and, in return, waived all claims against Japan arising from the war. Is that a
valid defense?
c. The surviving Filipina "comfort women" sue the Japanese government for damages before Philippine courts.
Will that case prosper?