904-036383Glasinac:316.

347

: .
IV ..
. .
IV. . .

, ,
, , ,
. 7.
5. . .,
, , , , .
, , .
, , ,1 .
, , ,
.
,
,
.
,
1

Strabo, VII, 5, 11.

36

Balcanica XXXV

2. , , ,
, . ,

, .
,3 , ,
. ,
, .

?
,
4.
,
.
,

. , ,
, .5
.
, , ,
, , , .6 , ,
.7

IV . .

Papazoglu 1978, 87129; 545550 (A126).

Strabo, VII, 5, 11.
4
Ps.-Arist. De ausc. mir. 138; Str.VII, 5,11: App. Ill. 3.
5
Papazoglu 1978, 91
6
Ibid., 126128.
7
Ibid., 106107
3

. ,

37

335, 8, , ,
. , , , ,
, .
, .
,
. .
310. .
20.000 , , , .
. , ,
.9
302/1, , ,10
, ,
, 11 5.000
,
.
,
, .12
,13 , ,
,
.
, , ,
,
. ,
, .14
8

Arr. Anab. I, 5, 15.

Diod. XX, 19, 1; Iust. XV, 2,1. Cf. Papazoglu 1978, 110115
10
Diod. XX, 113, 3.
11
Polyaen. IV,12, 1.
12
Papazoglu 1978, 122124.
13
App. Ill.4.
14
Papazoglu 1978, 116120.
9

38

Balcanica XXXV

.
, ,
279. . , .

.

IV IV
, . ,
, , .15

.


.
XIX ,16
. ,17 ,
.
,
, , . 18
, VII . .,

, ,
.19
,

15

Ibid., 103.
Truhelka 1893, 115116; cf. Benac 1987, 784787.
17
1949, 126136.
18
ovi 1967, 103122.
19
1972, 119133 ; 1992, 393399.
16

. ,

39

. 1.

, ,
.20
, , .
, , , ,
20

Papazoglu 1978, 106109.

40

Balcanica XXXV

1880. XX .21

XX ,
.22
.23


.24

.
, VIII VII ,
.
.

, ,
, , , .25
VII VI .
,
, , , , ,
. , , , ,
,
, 20 , : , , ,
.26

21

ovi 1987, 575643.

Benac ovi 1956; 1957.
23
Lucentini 1981, 67165.
24
2002, 736.
25
Benac ovi 1957, T. XVXX; ovi 1979, 143149.
26
Benac ovi 1957, T. XXIII, XXIV, XXVIXXVIII, XXXXXXII,
XXXXXXXXI; ovi 1979, 143149.
22

. ,

41

. 2.

VI , ,
.27

, V ,
V .28 IV

27
28

Vasi 2002, 2629.

Fiala 1893, 139.

42

Balcanica XXXV

.
VI
,
, , , , .
, ,
.29 , , VII VI (
),
VI V , IV .

VII , , ,
VI V . .
. , , , VI ,
, ,
.
VI V .., .30
, ,31 ,
.32 ,
,
,

, 33
, 29

Zotovi 1985, 68100.

Vasi 1997, 4562.
31
ovi 1967, 3540; 1966, 215229.
32
Mano-Zisi Lj. Popovi 1969, 67132
33
Palavestra 2003, 213223.
30

. ,

43

,
.34
,
, , , , , ,
, , ,
.35 , ,
VI V
, .36

.
, ,

.37
.38 .
,
, ,
, .39 , ,
, ,
. ,
34

Vasi 1999, 44 Nr. 270273; 93 Nr. 722; 95 Nr. 780,781; 97 Nr. 807.
ovi 1987, 575643.
, ,
.
,
.
36
Vasi 1999, 8898.
37
Garaanin 1949, loc. cit.
38
1981, 62.
39
Vasi 1988, 4346.
35

44

Balcanica XXXV

.
,
.
.
, , , , ,
. , ,
VI , , ,
VI V . .
VII
,
, . , VII VI , ,
.
, , . , VI V ,

. , , ,40 , ,
, ,
,
.
.
, ,
, . ,
.41 , , 40
41

Djukni Jovanovi 1965, 125.

Papazoglu 1978, 109.

. ,

45

,
V IV , ,

.
V . , , .
,
.
, .
,

.
,
, , ,
.

IV
, . , ,
335.
. , , . , .
, , .
. ,
, .
, . , ,
,
.
-

46

Balcanica XXXV

,
, ,
. ,
, ,
,

.42 .
,
.

Benac, A., 1987

O etnikim zajednicama starijeg eljeznog doba u Jugoslaviji, [] Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V, eljezno doba, Sarajevo 737804.
Benac, A., ovi, B.,
1956 Glasinac 1, Zemaljski muzej Sarajevo.
1957 Glasinac 2, Zemaljski muzej Sarajevo.
ovi, B.,
1967 O izvorima za istoriju Autarijata, Godinjak. Centar za balkanoloka ispitivanja 3, Sarajevo, 103122.
1967a Nalazi iz tumula u Gotovui (Plevlja) 1906, lanci i graa za
kulturnu istoriju Istone Bosne 7, Tuzla, 3540.
1979 ,
, , , 143149.
1987 Glasinaka kultura, [] Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V, eljezno doba, Sarajevo, 575643.

42

-
, 7. 6. . .,
, (.
1987, 660667),
4. . . ,
.

. ,

47

Djukni, ., Jovanovi, B., 1965

Illyrian Princely Mounds in Atenica, Archaeologia Iugoslavica VI , Beograd, 125.
Fiala, F., 1893
Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung prhistorischer Grabhgel auf dem Glasinac im Jahre 1892, Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus Bosnien und der
Hercegowina 1, Wien, 126168.
, M., 1949
,
2, , 126136.
Lucentini, N., 1981
1981 Sulla cronologia delle necropoli di Glasinac nell eta del ferro, Studi
di Protoistoria adriatica 1, Quaderni di cultura materiale 2, Roma LErma di Bretschneider, 67165.
Mano-Zisi, ., Popovi, Lj., 1969
Novi Pazar, The Illyrian-Greek Find, Narodni muzej Beograd.
, ., 1966
, III/IV, 215229.
Palavestra, ., 2003
A composite Amber Jewelry Set from Novi Pazar, Amber in Archaeology, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Amber in
Archaeology Talsi 2001, Riga, 213223.
Papazoglu, F., 1978
The Central Balkan Tribes in the pre-Roman times. Triballi, Autariatae,
Dardanians, Scordisci and Moesians. Amsterdam Adolf M. Hakkert.
, ., 1981
, [] I, , , 5170.
Truhelka, ., 1893
Poblie odredjivanje prehistorikih nahodjaja u Bosni i Hercegovini iz eljeznog doba, Glasnik zemaljskog muzeja V, Sarajevo, 111116.
Vasi, R.,
1972 Notes on the Autariatae and Triballi, Balcanica III, 119133
1987 Moravsko-timoka oblast, u Praistorija jugoslavenskih zemalja V,
eljezno doba, Sarajevo, 651672.
1988 Ein neuer spthallstattzeitlicher Silbergrtel vom Typ Mramorac,
Archologisches Korrespondenzblatt 18, 4346.

48

Balcanica XXXV

1992 Nekoliko stranica iz istorije Autarijata i Tribala, Balcanica XXIII,

393399.
1997 The Early Iron Age Regional Groups in the Uice area, Balcanica
XXVIII, 4562.
1999 Die Fibeln im Zentralbalkan, PBF XIV, 12, Stuttgart Franz Steiner
Verlag.
2002 . ,
Balcanica XXXII/XXXIII, 736.
Zotovi, M.,1985
Arheoloki i etniki problemi bronzanog i gvozdenog doba Zapadne Srbije,
(Dissertationes et monographiae XXVI), Zaviajni muzej Titovo Uice/Savez arheolokih drutava Jugoslavije, Beograd.

NOTES ON GLASINAC THE AUTARIATAE

Summar y
The Greek Geographer Strabo says the Autariatae used to be the largest and
the strongest of Illyrian tribes. The historical context in which they are mentioned
is dated to the second half of the fourth century BC, but the tribe is described as
neither strong nor large. After that date, there is no further record of them. Therefore
the inference seems reasonable that their acme should be dated to a period prior to
the fourth century BC.
According to archaeologists and modern historians, the Autariatae lived in
south-eastern Bosnia, south-western Serbia and northern Montenegro, i.e. in the
territory where a powerful Early Iron Age group has been identied and named the
Glasinac group after the Glasinac plateau east of Sarajevo. It was at the peak of its
power between the mid seventh and mid fth centuries BC, as dated by settlements
and graves as well as a large number of small nds, weapons, pottery, jewellery,
imported bronze vessels etc. On the strength of these chronological and chorological
parallels, numerous instances of correspondence that cannot be coincidental, the
author presumes a possible link between the Glasinac group and the Autariatae.
And yet, despite many arguments for the identication of the Autariatae with
the Glasinac group, it remains a hypothesis, more or less plausible. Identications of
the kind are always tentative. But if there is in the central Balkans an archaeologically
attested group that may be identied with a tribe referred to in classical sources, then
it certainly is the case of the Glasinac culture and the Illyrian tribe of Autariatae.
The issue should be viewed from a dierent angle too. Namely, despite the
relatively clear chronology of the Iron Age in the Balkans, with precisely delineated
developmental stages and with classes of material typical of each stage, regional
groups are dicult to dierentiate. The only one that stands out as a distinctive
cultural whole in all of its developmental phases is the Glasinac group in the west,
while in other areas the small number of graves still makes reliable identication
of groups impossible despite plentiful nds. For that reason one cannot speak with

. ,

49

any certainty about the material culture of the Triballi, the Dardanians or even the
Paeonians, to mention but the main ethnic groups. Or, more precisely, at present there
are no groups as clearly dierentiated as the Glasinac culture that may be identied
with those tribes. Further research will undoubtedly clarify these obscurities.
Meanwhile, patience is needed and the acceptance of what seems plausible at the
moment a connection between the Glasinac group and the Autariatae.