1 Completion of Blog Posts = _____________ x 5 pts each = __________________/ 20 pts 2. Reflection Blog Post = __________________/ 20 pts 3. Reader Response Grades = __________________ + __________________ = __________________/ 60 pts
Blog: _______________
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4.3) Acceptable (3.5) Unacceptable (2.8)
Purpose, Content Relationship Author makes insightful judgments about purpose, content or relationships within the source text. Writer makes well- supported judgments about purpose, content or relationships within the source text. Writer makes informed judgments concerning the purpose, content or relationships among elements in the source text
Writer makes judgments about the purpose, content or relationships in their reading. Reflection Response reflection is insightful and appropriate The writer is capable of creating personal and literary connections to the reading. Top scoring will be given to authors who incorporate their own voice within their entry in an excellent way. Response reflection is thoughtful, appropriate. The student is able to make personal connections or literary connections to the reader but the balance displayed may not be as seamless as a high level entry. Connections may come in the form of personal questions
Response reflection is fair, but not well supported. No personal connections are made. Response reflection is poor and unsupported. NO personal or literary connections are made. Content Response to the prompt is organized, well written and includes apt and specific references that elevate the writing. A clear understanding is displayed within this journal entry. Response to prompt is organized and well-written but lacks detail that would elevate the writing. A clear understanding is displayed within this journal entry. Response to the prompt is unorganized, but content is fair. While an understanding of text may be displayed at points, it is unclear whether or not a complete understanding of the source text has been reached.
Reponses to prompt is too vague. It is unclear as to whether or not the writer understands the focus text.
Blog: _______________
Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4.3) Acceptable (3.5) Unacceptable (2.8)
Purpose, Content Relationship Author makes insightful judgments about purpose, content or relationships within the source text. Writer makes well- supported judgments about purpose, content or relationships within the source text. Writer makes informed judgments concerning the purpose, content or relationships among elements in the source text
Writer makes judgments about the purpose, content or relationships in their reading. Reflection Response reflection is insightful and appropriate The writer is capable of creating personal and literary connections to the reading. Top scoring will be given to authors who incorporate their own voice within their entry in an excellent way. Response reflection is thoughtful, appropriate. The student is able to make personal connections or literary connections to the reader but the balance displayed may not be as seamless as a high level entry. Connections may come in the form of personal questions
Response reflection is fair, but not well supported. No personal connections are made. Response reflection is poor and unsupported. NO personal or literary connections are made. Content Response to the prompt is organized, well written and includes apt and specific references that elevate the writing. A clear understanding is displayed within this journal entry. Response to prompt is organized and well-written but lacks detail that would elevate the writing. A clear understanding is displayed within this journal entry. Response to the prompt is unorganized, but content is fair. While an understanding of text may be displayed at points, it is unclear whether or not a complete understanding of the source text has been reached.
Reponses to prompt is too vague. It is unclear as to whether or not the writer understands the focus text.