Penalosa v.

Santos
363 SCRA 545
Facts: The Petitioner entered into two contracts of sale with the respondent, The forer to help
evict a tenant, And the latter to forali!e the sale.
"#t s#$se%#entl& failed to pa& the p#rchase price, 'ence this petition where the respondent
contends that the contracts are a$sol#tel& sti#lated th#s void.
(ss#e: )hether or not the contract of sell was sti#lated.
'eld: *o, The co#rt held that there was no proof that the second contract was sti#lated, And
that the second contract satisf& the entire re%#ireent for a perfected contract of sale, *ael&
Consent, +efinite o$,ect and Ca#se or Consideration.
At the present case the eetin-s of the inds of the petitioner and respondent perfected the
contract, +espite the fail#re to pa& the p#rchase price, )hich ironicall& was d#e to the
#n,#stified ref#sal to cooperate $& the respondent.