Checklist to evaluate a

brainstorming
Instruments: checklist
Evaluation objective: preview ideas from the students.
Types of evaluation: heteroevalaution
Score: 10pts (2pts c/u) points: ________
Aspect YesNo
1)Identify the concepts
2)Correlates ideas from the topic
3)have the ability to express the
concepts
4) Explanation of the concepts and
meaning
5) Respect from the opinion of other
students.
Rubric to evaluate a power
point presentation
Instruments: rubric
Evaluation objective: _________________________
Types of evaluation: _________________________
Name of the students: ______________________
Score: ____________ points: ________
CATEGORY Excellent-4 Good-3 Satisfactory-2 Needs
Improvement-1
Content -
Accuracy
All content
throughout the
presentation is
accurate. There
are no factual
errors.
Most of the
content is
accurate but
there is one
piece of
information
that seems
inaccurate.
The content is
generally
accurate, but
one piece of
information is
clearly
inaccurate.
Content
confusing or
contains more
than one factual
error.
Sequencing
of
Information
Information is
organize in a
clear, logical
way. It is easy
to anticipate
the next slide.
Most
information is
organize in a
clear, logical
way. One slide
or piece of
information
seems out of
place.
Some
information is
logically
sequenced. An
occasional slide
or piece of
information
seems out of
place.
There is no
clear plan for
the organization
of information.
EfectivenessProject includes
all material
needed to give a
good
understanding
of the topic. The
Project is
lacking one or
two key
elements.
Project is
consistent with
Project is
missing more
than two key
elements. It is
rarely
consistent with
Project is
lacking several
key elements
and has
inaccuracies.
.Project is
project is
consistent with
the driving
question.
driving
question most
of the time.
the driving
question.
completely
inconsistent
with driving
question.
Use of
Graphics
All graphics are
attractive (size
and colors) and
support the
topic of the
presentation.
A few graphics
are not
attractive but
all support the
topic of the
presentation.
All graphics are
attractive but a
few do not
support the
topic of the
presentation.
Several graphics
are unattractive
AND detract
from the
content of the
presentation.
Text - Font
Choice &
Formatting
Font formats
(color, bold,
italic) have been
carefully
planned to
enhance
readability and
content.
Font formats
have been
carefully
planned to
enhance
readability.
Font formatting
has been
carefully
planned to
complement
the content. It
may be a Little
hard to read.
Font formatting
makes it very
difcult to read
the material.
Spelling and
Grammar
Presentation
has no
misspellings or
grammatical
errors.
Presentation
has 1-2
misspellings,
but no
grammatical
errors.
Presentation
has 1-2
grammatical
errors but no
misspellings.
Presentation
has more than
2 grammatical
and/or spelling
errors.
Cooperation Group shares
tasks and all
performed
responsibly all
of the time.
Group shares
tasks and
performed
responsibly
most of the
time.
Group shares
tasks and
performs
responsibly
some of the
time.
Group often is
not efective in
sharing tasks
and/or sharing
responsibility.

Delivery Members spoke
at a good rate,
volume and
with good
grammar. They
maintained eye
contact while
Members spoke
a little faster or
slower than
necessary, or
too quietly or
loudly. They
used acceptable
Members spoke
at a good rate
and volume,
but used poor
grammar.
They relied
heavily on their
Members
demonstrated
having paid
little attention
to rate, volume
or grammar.
They read
using, but not
reading their
notes.
grammar. They
maintained eye
contact, but
relied too much
on their notes.
notes. nearly word for
word from
notes.
Numerical scale to evaluate
a brochure
Instruments: numerical scale
Evaluation objective:
Types of evaluation:
Name of the students: ______________________
Score: ____________ points: ________
Categories - 5 4 3 2 Points
0
Attractiveness &
Organization
Mark: _____
Content-Accuracy
Mark: _____
Knowledge Gained
Mark: _____
Note: This sections
evaluation will
come from a
discussion with the
student.
. .
Writing-Clarity
Mark: _____
.
Graphics
Mark: _____
.
Appropriate Length

Mark: _____
Conceptual scale to
evaluate a dictionary
picture
Instruments: conceptual scale
Evaluation objective:
Types of evaluation:
Name of the students: ______________________
Score: ____________ points: ________
Evaluation Aspect Excellent(3)Good
(2)
Regular
(1)
1.Classify The Picture
According To The Topic
2.Defne The Meaning
3.Complete All The
Words From The
Vocabulary
4.Fallow Indicator
5.Responsability
Evaluation Rubric for Video Project
Instruments: conceptual scale
Evaluation objective: ______________________
Types of evaluation: ________________________
Name of the students: ______________________
Score: ____________ points: ________
Performance
Level
Needs
Improvement
Satisfactory Excellent
Group
Cooperation
Students needed
to be reminded
to stay on task
frequently. One
or two people
did all the work.
Students argued
with one another
or left some
students out of
the process.
0-4 points
All students
contributed a fair
share to the
project, though
some workloads
varied. Students
had to be
reminded
occasionally to
stay on task.
Students made
an efort to
include all group
members in the
process.
5-10 points
All students
contributed
equally to the
video. Students
stayed on task at
all times.
Students worked
with each other
in a friendly
manner.
11-15 points
Storyboard Students did not
complete a
storyboard or
storyboard did
not match video.
0-2 points
Students
completed the
storyboard on
time, but some
items are not
thoroughly
described.
Storyboard
matches the
Students
completed
storyboard on
time.
Storyboard is
thorough and
matches the
video.
6-10 points
video.
3-5 points
Documentation There is no
documentation.
0 points
Most of the
elements taken
from other
sources are
documented;
however, some
documentation
may be
inaccurate or
missing.
1-3 points
All elements
from other
sources are
accurately
documented.
4-5 points
Subject Content Subject
knowledge is not
evident.
Information is
confusing,
incorrect, or
fawed.
0-9 points
Subject
knowledge is
evident in much
of the video.
Most information
is clear,
appropriate, and
correct.
10-20 points
Subject
knowledge is
evident
throughout the
video. All
information is
clear,
appropriate and
correct.
21-30 points
Video content
and organization
The video lacks
a central theme,
clear point of
view, and logical
sequence of
information.
Much of the
information is
irrelevant to the
overall message
0-2 points
Information is
connected to a
theme. Details
are logical and
information is
relevant
throughout most
of the video
3-5 points
Video includes a
clear statement
of purpose.
Events and
messages are
presented in a
logical order,
with relevant
information that
supports the
videos main
ideas.
6-10 points
Introduction The introduction
does not orient
the viewer to
what will follow.
0-1 points
The introduction
is clear and
coherent and
evokes moderate
interest/response
The introduction
is motivating,
and hooks the
viewer from the
beginning.
from the viewer.
2-3 points
4-5 points
Mechanics The text and
audio have 4 or
more grammar
or spelling
errors.
0-2
The text and
audio have 1-2
grammar or
spelling errors.
3-4
The text and
audio have no
grammar or
spelling errors
5 points
Production Video is of poor
quality and is
unedited. There
are no
transitions
added or
transitions are
used so
frequently that
they detract
from the video.
There are no
graphics.
0-10
Tape is edit. A
variety of
transitions are
used and most
transitions help
tell the story.
Most of video has
good pacing and
timing. Graphics
are used
appropriately.
11-15 points
Tape is edit.
Video runs
smoothly from
shot to shot. A
variety of
transitions is
use to assist in
communicating
the main idea.
Shots and
scenes work well
together.
Graphics explain
and reinforce
key points in the
video.
16-20 points
Total
Project Grade