100%(5)100% нашли этот документ полезным (5 голосов)
6K просмотров2 страницы
The document provides information about two production management assignment exercises. For the first exercise, Borges Machine Shop is considering three alternatives for producing 200,000 gear housings and compares the total costs of the general-purpose equipment, flexible manufacturing system, and dedicated machine options. The flexible manufacturing system has the lowest total cost of $3,000,000. The second exercise asks about the crossover point where it is equally cost-effective for Stan Company to produce a gear assembly itself versus purchasing it from SLT Supply Inc. The number of units at the crossover point is calculated to be 6,881 units.
The document provides information about two production management assignment exercises. For the first exercise, Borges Machine Shop is considering three alternatives for producing 200,000 gear housings and compares the total costs of the general-purpose equipment, flexible manufacturing system, and dedicated machine options. The flexible manufacturing system has the lowest total cost of $3,000,000. The second exercise asks about the crossover point where it is equally cost-effective for Stan Company to produce a gear assembly itself versus purchasing it from SLT Supply Inc. The number of units at the crossover point is calculated to be 6,881 units.
The document provides information about two production management assignment exercises. For the first exercise, Borges Machine Shop is considering three alternatives for producing 200,000 gear housings and compares the total costs of the general-purpose equipment, flexible manufacturing system, and dedicated machine options. The flexible manufacturing system has the lowest total cost of $3,000,000. The second exercise asks about the crossover point where it is equally cost-effective for Stan Company to produce a gear assembly itself versus purchasing it from SLT Supply Inc. The number of units at the crossover point is calculated to be 6,881 units.
1. Borges Machine Shop, Inc, has a one year contract for the production of 200,000 gear housings for a new off-road vehicle. Owner Luis Borges hopes the contract will be extended and the volume increased next year. Borges has developed costs for the three alternatives. These are general-purpose equipment(GPE), flexible manufacturing system (FMS), and expensive , but efficient , dedicated machine(DM). the cost data follow; GPE FMS DM Annual contract units 200,000 200,000 200,000 Annual fixed cost $100,000 $200,000 $500,000 Variable cost/unit $15.00 $14.00 $13.00 Which process is best for this contract?
Solution to Problem #1:
Compare the Total Cost that each alternative may incur: Total Cost (TC) = Fixed Cost (FC) + [Variable Cost (VC) x Annual Contract Units (ACU)]
For GPE: TC GPE = $100,000 + ($15.00 x 200,000) = $3,100,000 For FMS: TC FMS = $200,000 + ($14.00 x 200,000) = $3,000,000 For DM: TC DM = $500,000 + ($13.00 x 200,000) = $3,100,000
2. Stan company is considering producing a gear assembly that it now purchases from SLT Supply Inc. SLT charges $4 per unit with a minimum order of 3,000 units. Stan estimates that it will cost $15,000 to set up the process and then $1.82 per unit for labor and materials. a. Draw a graph illustrating the point of indifference(crossover). b. Determine the number of units where either choice has the same cost.
A.
Fixed Cost Variable Cost per unit Stan Company 15000 1.82 SLT Supply Inc. 0 4
Answer: By comparing the alternatives, the lowest cost of the three alternatives is Flexible Manufacturing System with only $3,000,000.
B. No. of Units where either choice has the same cost. $15,000 + $1.82x = $4x $15,000 = $2.18x X = 6,880.73 units X = 6881 units 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 T o t a l
C o s t ,
$
No. of Units Comparison of Total Cost Stan Company SLT Supply Inc Crossover point 6881 units
C. Nos. 100 of 2013, 49 of 2014 & 89 of 2014 Shri Sharad Kumar Jhunjunwala vs. Ministry of Railways APPEAL No.01 of 2016 Sharad Kumar Jhunjhunwala, Vs UOI and Minstry of Railways