Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

Grego vs.

COMELEC
GR. No. 125955, June 19, 1997

FACTS: On Oct. 31. 1981, private respondent Basco was removed from office as Deputy sheriff
by the court upon finding of serious misconduct in an administrative complaint. Ran for councilor
in the second district of Manila and had won the race for 3 term. On his final term, an election
protest was filed against him by petitioner Grego, seeking to disqualify him on the ground that
he was removed previously in an office as a result of an administrative case. On May 14, 1995,
COMELEC ordered the parties to submit memoranda, but before the parties able to comply the
directive, the Board of Canvassers proclaimed Basco as duly elected councilor and took his
oath of office. Petitioner contends that, respondent COMELEC should have suspended the
proclamation. Such act according to the petitioner violated the provision of sec. 6 of R.A 6646,
which prohibits the proclamation of the elected candidate by the COMELEC pending final
judgment on the case filed, uses the word may, therefore giving discretion to order the
suspension of the proclamation.

ISSUE: Whether or not respondent COMELEC violated the provision of R.A 6646 when it did
not suspend the proclamation of the petitioner as the elected councilor pending final judgment of
the case filed against it.

HELD: It did not. The use of the word may in sec.6 of R.A 6646 indicates that the proclamation
is merely directory and permissive in nature and confers no jurisdiction. What is merely
mandatory, according to the provision itself, is the continuation of trial and hearing of the action,
inquiry or protest. The rule or regulations should be within the scope of the authority granted by
the legislature to the administrative agency. In case of discrepancy between the basic law and a
rule or regulation issued to implement said law, the basic law prevails because said rule or
regulations cannot go beyond the terms and provisions of the basic. Since section 6 of R.A
6646, the law which section 5 of Rule 25 of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure seeks to
implement, employed the word may, it is, therefore improper and highly irregular for the
COMELEC to have used instead the word shall in its rules.

Вам также может понравиться