Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Table #33
1. Konrad Adenauer Foundation (KAS) (Germany)
2. Friedrich Ebert Foundation (FES) (Germany)
3. Heinrich Boll Stiftung (HBS) (Germany)
4. Demos (United Kingdom)
5. Friedrich Naumann Foundation (FNS) (Germany)
6. Center for European Policy Studies (Belgium)
7. Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) (United States)
8. Fundacin para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Dilogo (FRIDE) (Spain)
9. Fabian Society (United Kingdom)
10. Fundacin IDEAS (Spain)
11. Hanns Seidel Foundation (Germany)
12. Central Party School (China)
13. European Ideas Network (Belgium)
14. Fondation pour lInnovation Politique (France)
15. Fundacion para el Analisis y los Estudios Sociales (FAES) (Spain)
16. Robert Shuman Foundation (France)
17. Fundacin Armando Alvares Penteado (FAAP) (Brazil)
18. Fondazione Italianieuropei (Italy)
19. Fundacin Pensar (Argentina)
20. Center for Policy Studies (Belgium)
21. New Democrat Network (United States)
22. Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) (Belgium)
23. Fundacin Jaime Guzman (Chile)
24. Institute of Strategic Analysis and Policy Research (INSAP) (Malaysia)
25. Green European Foundation (GEF) (Belgium)
26. Terra Nova (France)
27. Foundation for EU Democracy (Belgium)
28. Wiardi Beckman Foundation (The Netherlands)
29. Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (Germany)
30. SEDAR Institute (Malaysia)
Some of the institutions listed in this category are formally affiliated with a political party while others
are independent, but their research and policy proposals aligned with a political party even though they lack
formal affiliation.
101
Best For-Profit Think Tanks (Unranked and in Alphabetical order)
Table #34
Access Capital Research (Ethiopia)
AT Kearney Business Roundtable (United States)
Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation (Portugal)
Daimler Benz Future Research Unit (Germany)
Deutsche Bank Research (Germany)
Economist Intelligence Unit (United Kingdom)
Ernest & Young (United States)
Eurasia Group (United States)
Google Ideas (United States)
IHS Global Insight (United Kingdom)
Initiative Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft (INSM) (Germany)
Kernel Development Research P.L.C. (Ethiopia)
Kissinger Associates (United States)
McKinsey Global Institute (United States)
Nomura Research Institute (Japan)
Oxford Analytica (United States)
Prioritet (Azerbaijan)
Roubini Global Economics (United States)
Samsung Economic Research Institute (Korea)
SiR International (United States)
Stratfor (United States)
The Hybrid Reality Institute (United States)
Wiardi Beckman Foundation (The Netherlands)
102
Best Think Tanks with an Annual Operating Budget under $5 Million USD
Table #35
1. North-South Institute (Canada)
2. Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE) (Poland)
3. Centro Brasileiro de Relaes Internationais (CEBRI) (Brazil)
4. Libertad y Desarrollo (Chile)
5. Centro de Estudios Pblicos (CEP) (Chile )
6. Economic Policy Research Institute (South Africa)
7. African Technology Policy Studies network (ATPS) (Kenya)
8. Center for Economic and Social Development (CESD) (Azerbaijan)
9. Center for Public Policy Studies (Malaysia)
10. IMANI Center for Policy and Education (Ghana)
11. Centro de Divulgacin del Conocimiento Econmico para la Libertad (CEDICE Libertad)
(Venezuela)
12. Consejo Argentino de Relaciones Internacionales (Argentina)
13. USP Research Center for Public Policy (Brazil)
14. Unirule Institute of Economics (China )
15. Integrated Research and Action for Development (IRADe) (India)
16. Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (Ethiopia)
17. Instituto Ecuatoriano de Economa Poltica (Ecuador )
18. Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) (Poland)
19. Foreign Policy Research Institute United States
20. Fundar (Mexico)
103
Best Advocacy Campaign
Table #36
1. Amnesty International (United Kingdom)
2. Human Rights Watch (United Kingdom)
3. Transparency International (TI) (Germany)
4. International Crisis Group (ICG) (Belgium)
5. Batory Foundation (Poland)
6. Open Society Europe (Belgium)
7. Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) (United States)
8. Qatar Foundation (Qatar)
9. Economic Research Center (Azerbaijan)
10. Global Witness ((United Kingdom)
11. Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) (Norway)
12. Enough Project (United States)
13. Pew Research Center (United States)
14. Center for American Progress (CAP) (United States)
15. Heritage Foundation (United States)
16. Cato Institute (United States)
17. Arab Reform Alternatives (ARA) (Egypt)
18. FreedomWorks (United States)
19. Acton Institute (United States)
20. One Campaign (United States)
21. Center for European Policy Analysis (United States)
22. Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network (FANRPAN) (South Africa)
23. European Council on Foreign Relations (United Kingdom)
24. Heinrich Boll Stiftung (HBS) (Germany)
25. British Taxpayers Alliance (United Kingdom)
26. Institute for Justice (United States)
27. Americans for Tax Reform (United States)
28. Copenhagen Consensus Center (Denmark)
29. African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) (Kenya)
30. Central Asian Free Market Institute (Kyrgyzstan)
31. Istituto Bruno Leoni (Italy)
32. Conectas Direitos Humanos (Brazil)
33. Center for Policy Analysis (Ghana)
34. Center for Global Development (CGD) (United States)
35. Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) (United States)
36. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) (United Kingdom)
37. GRAIN (Spain)
38. Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (Uganda)
39. Association for International Affairs (Czech Republic)
40. Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales (COMEXI) (Mexico)
104
41. Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA) (Senegal)
42. Tax Foundation (United States)
43. Americas Principles Project (United States)
44. Centro de Investigaciones Econmicas Nacionales (CIEN) (Guatemala)
45. Truman National Security Project (TNSP) (United States)
46. Centro de Implementacin de Polticas Pblicas para la Equidad y el Crecimiento (CIPPEC)
(Argentina)
47. European Stability Initiative (Germany)
48. Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches en Sciences Sociales (CERSS) (Morocco)
49. Corner House (United Kingdom)
50. Refugee Advocacy Network (Australia)
51. Center for Strategic Studies (Azerbaijan)
52. Culture and Arts Society (Ethiopia)
53. Tax Justice Network (United Kingdom)
54. Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) (United States)
55. Global Financial Integrity (United States)
56. Fundacion Ethos (Mexico)
57. World Federalist Movement (United States)
58. The Geneva Association (Switzerland)
59. Uwezo (Kenya)
60. Ethiopian Broadcast (Ethiopia)
61. Fundacion para el Desarrollo Economico y Social de Panama (FUDESPA) (Panama)
62. Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad (Mexico)
63. African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) (Kenya)
64. Fortnight for Freedom (United States)
65. Analytical Centre on Globalization and Regional Cooperation (ACGRC) (Armenia)
66. Centre for Public Policy Studies (CPPS) (Malaysia)
67. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) (India)
68. Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad (Mexico)
69. Makerere Institute of Social Research (Uganda)
70. Think New Mexico (United States)
71. Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research (Ukraine)
72. Institut d'Etudes Africaines (IEA) (Morocco)
73. National Budget Group (Azerbaijan)
74. National Council for Science & Technology (Kenya)
75. SynergyNet (China)
105
Best Policy Study/Report Produced by a Think Tank 2011-2012
Table #37
1. Brookings Institution (United States)
2. Bruegel (Belgium)
3. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (United States)
4. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States)
5. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (United States)
6. Human Rights Watch (United States)
7. RAND Corporation (United States)
8. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI) (United States)
9. Peterson Institute for International Economics (United States)
10. Transparency International (TI) (Germany)
11. Center for New American Security (CNAS) (United States)
12. C.D. Howe Institute (Canada)
13. International Crisis Group (ICG) (Belgium)
14. IDEAS (United Kingdom)
15. Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic studies (ACPSS) (Egypt)
16. Fundao Getlio Vargas (FGV) (Brazil)
17. Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE) (Uganda)
18. Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network (FANRPAN) (South Africa)
19. Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO, RAS) (Russia)
20. Institute of Development Studies (IDS) (United Kingdom)
21. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) (United Kingdom)
22. Center for Global Development (CGD) (United States)
23. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) (India)
24. Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation (Japan)
25. Centre for European Reform (CER) (United Kingdom)
26. Fundacion para la Relaciones Internacionales y el Dialogo Exterior (FRIDE) (Spain)
27. German Development Institute (DIE) (Germany)
28. Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) (Norway)
29. Libertad y Desarrollo (Chile)
30. Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) (Japan)
31. Notre Europe (France)
32. German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) (Germany)
33. Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) (Greece)
34. Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale (ISPI) (Italy)
35. European Council for International Political Economy (ECIPE) (Belgium)
36. Analytical Centre on Globalization and Regional Cooperation (ACGRC) (Armenia)
37. Centro de Investigaciones Econmicas Nacionales (CIEN) (Guatemala)
38. Kofi Anan Foundation (Switzerland)
39. Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad (Mexico)
40. The Economic Policy Research Foundation (TEPAV) (Turkey)
106
41. Institute of Peace & Conflict Studies (India)
42. Cellule d'Analyse de Politiques Economiques du CIRES (Cote d'Ivore)
43. Heinrich Boll Stiftung (HBS) (Germany)
44. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA) (Kenya)
45. Politeia (United Kingdom)
46. Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche Dmographiques (CERED) (Vietnam)
47. The Institute of Energy Economics (Japan)
48. Corner House (United Kingdom)
49. Asociace pro mezinarodni otazky (Czech Republic)
50. Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network (South Africa)
51. The Romanian Academic Society (Romania)
52. Institut Royal des Etudes Stratgiques (IRES) (Morocco)
53. Moroccan Interdisciplinary Center for Strategic and International Studies (Morocco)
54. National Council for Science & Technology (Kenya)
55. Institut d'Etudes Africaines (IEA) (Morocco)
56. Levy Economics Institute (United States)
57. Think New Mexico (United States)
58. United Service Institution (India)
59. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (IEP) (Peru)
60. West Africa Institute (Cape Verde)
107
APPENDICES
A. CALL FOR INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND
REGIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL EXPERT PANEL MEMBERS
Call for nominations email letter sent on April 9, 2012
1st reminder sent on May 28, 2011
2nd reminder sent on June 1, 2011
Nominations closed on June 5, 2011
April 9, 2012
Dear Friend and Colleague:
We are currently seeking nominations of qualified individuals to serve on the Expert Panels
for the 2012 Global Go To Think Tank Index Project.
The Expert Panels (EP) will be comprised of distinguished individuals from around the
world who are policy makers, public and private donors, journalists, former think tank
executives and academics. These individuals will provide advice and support for the Global
Go To Think Tank Index Project. The responsibilities will include providing advice on
project development and design, external relations and resource mobilization.
The Expert Panelist (EP) members should have an in- depth knowledge of national and
regional think tanks and/or be a functional areas expert in the research areas covered by the
think tanks index (i.e. security and international affairs, domestic economics, social policy,
etc.). Expert Panelists will help with the nominations and rankings process for the 2012
Global Go To Think Tank Index. Members will be expected to help solicit and review
nominations in their area of expertise and assist with the ranking process. The purpose of
the EP is to assure the quality and integrity of the rankings process.
You are encouraged to make nominations in all categories where you can recommend
qualified candidates. Nominations can be made below in the following categories:
1. Regional Expert Panels
a. United States
b. Canada, Mexico, and Caribbean
c. South America
d. Middle East and North Africa
e. Sub-Saharan Africa
f. Western Europe
g. Central and Eastern Europe
h. South and Central Asia (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
108
2. Functional Research Area Expert Panels
a. International Development
b. Health Policy
c. Environmental Policy
d. Security and International Affairs
e. Domestic Economic Policy
f. International Economic Policy
g. Social Policy
h. Science and Technology Policy
i. Transparency and Good Governance
j. Energy and Resource Policy (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
k. Education Policy (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
3. Specialty Categories
a. Best Think Tank with a Budget under $5 Million USD
b. Best New Think Tanks (last 24 months)
c. Best Independent Think Tanks (financially, structurally and legally independent of
government and political parties) (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
d. Think Tank with an Exemplary Policy-Oriented Public Policy Research Program
e. Best Use of the Internet and Social Media to Engage the Public
f. Best Use of the Media (Print or Electronic) to Communicate Programs and Research
g. Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program
h. Best Advocacy Campaign (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
i. Best Policy Study Produced by a Think Tank 2011-2012 (NEW CATEGORY IN 2012)
j. Most Significant Impact on Public Policy
k. Most Innovative Policy Ideas/Proposals
For any questions or problems please contact James G. McGann at jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
or (215)746-2928.
James G. McGann, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, International Relations Program
Director, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6304
Main Office: 215 898-0452
Direct Line: 215 746-2928
Mobile: 215 206-1799
Email: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
IR Website: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/irp/
TTCSP Website: http://www.gotothinktank.com
109
B. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: 2011 GLOBAL GO TO THINK TANK INDEX
Email to over 11,500 Individuals and Organizations in over 213 countries
Call for nomination email letter sent on June 30, 2012
1st Reminder sent on July 12, 2012
2nd Reminder sent on August 17, 2012
3rd Reminder sent on August 24, 2012
4th and final reminder sent on August 30, 2011
Nominations Round I closed on September 6, 2012
Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
International Relations Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 South 36th Street
PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA 19104-6305
TEL. (001) 215 746-2928
EMAIL: Jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
June 30, 2012
Greetings Colleagues and Friends:
I am pleased to announce the commencement of the 2012 Global Go-To Think Tank
Report nominating process. The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University
of Pennsylvania (TTCSP) is contacting you for help in identifying the worlds leading think
tanks for the 2012 Global Go-To Index. The primary objective of the index is to bring
national and international recognition to the important role think tanks play in civil societies
and governments around the world.
Please submit your nominations using the link to the survey below on or before August 15,
2012. Please take the time to make your nominations online, using this survey link:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GXDF5XH. Nominations can also be submitted by
email to jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu but we encourage you to use the survey.
The process is simple and we have provided the following tools to help complete the survey:
a link to the online nominations survey, a list of the nomination categories, a definition of
think tanks, think tank ranking criteria and a think tank assessment tool. I encourage you to
make nominations only in the areas in which you have knowledge and experience and for
think tanks that you feel warrant consideration as centers of excellence on global, regional
and national levels.
The selection process for the 2012 Global Go-To Rankings will be conducted in three
rounds. This methodology in the rankings and selection process is the result of the
recommendations made by the Expert Panelists who participated in the 2010 rankings
110
process. In 2010 the ranking criteria and rankings process underwent a thorough review by
120 members of the Global Expert Panel and several changes were implemented. Each one
of criterion used to rank think tanks was evaluated, which validated the efficacy of the
nominations and ranking criteria used for the global rankings. The Expert Panel members
made some additional recommendations at the conclusion of the 2011 Rankings that are
reflected in this years survey.
Finally, the Expert Panel members voiced strong support for the open, democratic and
transparent process that they feel is one of the defining characteristics of the Global Think
Tank Index. The Expert Panel also endorsed the methodology of using regional and
functional experts and peers who are guided by a set of criteria to rank think tanks. While we
are encouraged by these findings we continue to strive to improve the process and welcome
any comments or suggestions you might have for how we might improve the Global Go-To
Think Tank Index.
This years process and schedule is summarized below:
Round I:
Nominations June 30 September 2012
Call for Nominations is sent to 6,500 think tanks and approximately 3500 journalists, public
and private donors and policy-makers from around the world. These nominations are
tabulated and institutes with 5 or more nominations are included in the next step of the 2012
Think Tank Rankings process.
Round II:
Peer/Expert Rankings: September November 2012
Think Tanks with 5 or more nominations will be placed in an electronic ranking survey. A
letter announcing the second round is emailed to all the think tanks, journalists, public and
private donors, and the policy maker group who have agreed to participate in the process.
The rankings are tabulated and the list of finalists is generated for the Expert Panel to review
and make final selections. This year Regional and Functional Expert Panels have been
created for every category and these specialists will be consulted to help assure the quality
and accuracy of the nominations before they are placed on the final rankings survey.
Individuals who served on last years Expert Panel and those who have been nominated this
year will be invited to serve on the 2011 Expert Panel. Experts from every region and
functional area will be represented on the Expert Panel.
Round III:
Expert Panel Selects 2011 Go To Think Tanks: November December 2012
The members of the Expert Panel receive information packets by email in order to facilitate
the final selection process.
2012 Global Go-To Think Tank Rankings Announced: January 2013
The 2012 Global Go-To Think Tanks are announced at the United Nations in New York
and at selected organizations in every region of the world.
NOMINATION INSTRUCTIONS AND PROCEDURES
111
You may nominate up to 25 organizations for the leading think tank in the world. Please also
nominate top think tanks by region, areas of research and special achievement.
You may nominate up to 25 institutions per region, 25 per research area, 10 per
organizational or programmatic achievement and 5 Top Think Tanks.
Please note that all nominations you make will be kept confidential. NO SELF
NOMINATIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED.
Please submit your responses no later than August 15, 2011.
A copy of the unabridged 2010 Global Go-To Report is currently posted on the University
of Pennsylvania International Relations Program web page:
http://www.gotothinktank.com/wp-
content/uploads/2010GlobalGoToReport_ThinkTankIndex_UNEDITION_15_.pdf
We value your input and welcome additional comments or suggestions you may have for
improving the nominating and ranking processes, as well as how the findings are reported
and disseminated.
Thank you for your assistance with the 2011 Global Go-To Think Tank Index.
James G. McGann, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, International Relations Program
Director, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6304
Main Office: 215 898-0452
Direct Line: 215 746-2928
Email: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
IR Web site: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/irp/
Helping to bridge the gap between knowledge and policy
Helping to bridge the gap between knowledge and policy
2010 Global Go To Think Tank Nomination Categories
Please use the on-line survey instrument to submit your nomination so they can be properly
tabulated.
Category I. Best New Think Tanks (established in the last 18 months) (Global)
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category II. Outstanding Policy-Oriented Public Policy Research Program (Global)
112
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category III. Best Use of the Internet and Social Media to Engage the Public (Global)
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category VI. Best Use of the Media (Print or Electronic) to Communicate Programs and
Research (Global)
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category V. Best External Relations/Public Engagement Program
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category VI. Greatest Impact on Public Policy
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category VII. Think Tanks with the Most Innovative Policy Ideas/Proposals
Nominate up to 10 institutions and include the specific policy idea/proposal.
Category VIII. Best University Affiliated Think Tanks
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category IX. Best Government Affiliated Think Tanks
Nominate up to 10 institutions
Category X. Best Political Party Affiliated Think Tanks
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category XI. Best For-Profit Think Tanks
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category XII: Best Think Tanks with an Annual Operating Budget of less than $5 Million
USD (Global)
Nominate up to 10 institutions.
Category XIII: Top Think Tanks by Research Area
Nominate up to 25 institutions for each of these categories:
Top 25 International Development Think Tanks
Top 25 Health Policy Think Tanks
Top 25 Environment Think Tanks
Top 25 Security and International Affairs Think Tanks
Top 25 Domestic Economic Policy Think Tanks
Top 25 International Economic Policy Think Tanks
Top 25 Social Policy Think Tanks
Top 25 Science and Technology Think Tanks
Top 25 Transparency and Good Governance Think Tanks
Category XIV: Top Think Tanks by Region (Regional)
Nominate up to 25 institutions for each of these regions:
113
Top 25 Think Tanks Worldwide (Non-United States) ****
Top 25 Think Tanks in the United States
Top 25 Think Tanks in Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean
Top 25 Think Tanks in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
Top 25 Think Tanks in Sub-Saharan Africa
Top 25 Think Tanks in Asia
Top 25 Think Tanks in Central and Eastern Europe
Top 25 Think Tanks in Western Europe
Top 25 Think Tanks in the Central and South America
Category XV: Think Tank of the YearTop Think Tank in the World (Global)
Nominate up to 5 institutions.
**** United States think tanks have been excluded from this category in order to collect a
representative sample of the top think tanks worldwide. Many of the top think tanks in the
United States have a global reach in terms of their research and programming. Such think
tanks may have taken a disproportional number of the Top 25 spots; thus, please exclude
U.S. think tanks in this category.
Category XIV: Think Tank of the YearTop
THINK TANK DEFINITION
Think tanks or public policy research, analysis, and engagement institutions are organizations
that generate policy-oriented research, analysis, and advice on domestic and international
issues in an effort to enable policymakers and the public to make informed decisions about
public policy issues. Think tanks may be affiliated with political parties, governments,
interest groups, or private corporations or constituted as independent nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs). These institutions often act as a bridge between the academic and
policymaking communities, serving the public interest as an independent voice that translates
applied and basic research into a language and form that is understandable, reliable, and
accessible for policymakers and the public.
Structured as permanent bodies, in contrast with ad hoc commissions or research panels,
think tanks devote a substantial portion of their financial and human resources to
commissioning and publishing research and policy analysis in the social sciences: political
science, economics, public administration, and international affairs. The major outputs of
these organizations are books, monographs, reports, policy briefs, conferences, seminars,
formal briefings and informal discussions with policymakers, government officials, and key
stakeholders.
In an effort to help make sense of this highly diverse set of institutions we have created a
typology that takes into consideration the comparative differences in political systems and
civil societies around the world. While think tanks may perform many roles in their host
societies, not all think tanks do the same things to the same extent. Over the last 85 years,
several distinctive organizational forms of think tanks have come into being that differ
substantially in terms of their operating styles, their patterns of recruitment, their aspirations
to academic standards of objectivity and completeness in research and their engagement of
114
policy makers, the press and the public. We believe, despite these differences that most think
tanks tend to fall into the broad categories outlined below.
CATEGORIES OF THINK TANK AFFILIATIONS
Category Definition
Autonomous and Independent Significant independence from any one interest group or
donor and autonomous in its operation and funding from government.*
Quasi Independent Autonomous from government but an interest group (i.e. unions,
religious groups, etc.), donor or contracting agency provides a majority of the funding and
has significant influence over operations of the think tank.
University Affiliated A policy research center at a university.
Political Party Affiliated Formally affiliated with a political party.
Government Affiliated A part of the structure of government.
Quasi Governmental Funded exclusively by government grants and contracts but not a part
of the formal structure of government.
NOMINATIONS AND RANKING CRITERIA
It is essential that you consider a variety of criteria in making your decisions. These may
include, but are not limited to:
# Direct relationship between organizations efforts in a particular area to a positive change
in societal values such as significant changes in quality of life within respective country
(amounts of goods and services available to citizens, state of physical and mental health,
quality of environment, quality of political rights, access to institutions);
# Publication of the organizations work by peer reviewed journals, books and other
authoritative publications;
# Ability to retain elite scholars & analysts;
# Access to elites in the area of policymaking, media and academia;
# Academic reputation (formal accreditation, citation of think tank, publications by scholars
in major academic books, journals, conferences and in other professional publications);
# Media reputation (number of media appearances, interviews and citations);
# Reputation with policymakers (name recognition with particular issues, number of
briefings and official appointments, policy briefs, legislative testimony delivered);
# Level of organizations financial resources (endowment, membership fees, annual
donations, government and private contracts, earned income);
# Ability of the organization to meet the demands of those that fund it or to meet the goals
of its respective grant-making institution;
# Overall output of organization (policy proposals, publications, interviews, conferences,
staff nominated to official posts);
# Number of recommendations to policymakers, staff serving advisory roles to policymakers,
awards given to scholars;
# Usefulness of organizations information in advocacy work, preparing legislation or
testimony, preparing academic papers or presentations, conducting research or teaching;
# The organizations ability to produce new knowledge or alternative ideas on policy;
# Ability to bridge the gap between the academic and policymaking communities;
# Ability to bridge the gap between policymakers and the public;
115
# Ability to include new voices in the policymaking process;
# Ability of organization to be inscribed within issue and policy networks;
# Success in challenging the traditional wisdom of policymakers and in generating innovative
policy ideas and programs.
THINK TANK ASSESSMENT TOOL
Clearly, assessing the impact of think tanks is not an easy endeavor to undertake given the
various and conflicting actors, events, and politics involved in the policy making process.
Despite the significant challenges in establishing a causal relationship between knowledge
and policy, it is necessary for think tanks to understand and effectively respond to the
growing chorus of questions being raised by donors, journalists, and the public about the
role and influence of think tanks in civil societies and governments around the world.
According to the research of Donald Abelson, James McGann, and others, think tanks can
utilize various measures to assess the impact of increases in their activities as well as to
account for their contributions to the policymaking environment and civil society. McGanns
recent (2008) research has focused on developing a comprehensive assessment tool for
evaluating a think tanks impact. The impetus for this research, in part, was the apparent
confusion that exists about the differences between outputs and impacts. In various studies
and surveys that McGann has conducted over the years, researchers and think tanks
responded curiously when asked about impact on public policy and how they measure it.
The overwhelming response was to provide a list of research outputs (number of books
published, conference held, web hits, media appearances, etc.). Outputs, however, are not
the only way to measure impact. The metric provided below is designed to serve as a
catalyst for a discussion on how to effectively measure the impact of think tanks. It is
provided here as background for the think tank ranking process in the hopes that it will help
clarify the distinction between outputs and impacts and provide a useful tool as you prepare
your rankings.
# Resource indicators: Ability to recruit and retain leading scholars and analysts; the level,
quality, and stability of financial support; proximity and access to decision-makers and other
policy elites; a staff with the ability to conduct rigorous research and produce timely and
incisive analysis; institutional currency; quality and reliability of networks; and key contacts in
the policy academic communities, and the media
# Utilization indicators: Reputation as a go-to organization by media and policy elites in
the country; quantity and quality of media appearances and citations, web hits, testimony
before legislative and executive bodies; briefings, official appointments, consultation by
officials or departments/agencies; books sold; reports distributed; references made to
research and analysis in scholarly and popular publications and attendees at conferences and
seminars organized
# Output indicators: Number and quality of: policy proposals and ideas generated;
publications produced (books, journal articles, policy briefs, etc.); news interviews
conducted; briefings, conferences, and seminars organized; and staff who are nominated to
advisory and government posts
# Impact indicators: Recommendations considered or adopted by policymakers and civil
society organizations; issue network centrality; advisory role to political parties, candidates,
transition teams; awards granted; publication in or citation of publications in academic
116
journals, public testimony and the media that influences the policy debate and decision-
making; listserv and web site dominance; and success in challenging the conventional
wisdom and standard operating procedures of bureaucrats and elected officials in the
country
Beyond this quantitative assessment, an effective evaluation of impact should also involve
NGOs, as well as members of the government and policymakers, to ascertain the degree to
which they have utilized the grantees research output. This participation can be obtained
through interviews, surveys, questionnaires, and focus group meetings, utilizing the
Outcome Mapping which moves away from assessing the products of an activity or a
program to focus on changes in behaviors and relationships (outcomes) which can lead to
changes. Impact can be viewed as positive if it changes the behavior, relationships,
activities, or actions of the people, groups, and organizations with whom a program works
directly.
Although this qualitative assessment is essential because it recognizes that policy impact can
be successfully achieved even if policy prescriptions are not directly translated into actual
policy, we recommend that this assessment should be translated into numerical rankings,
thereby allowing comparisons with baseline data for effective monitoring and evaluation in
the future.
THANKS FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THE NOMINATIONS
SURVEY!!!!
117
C. EMAIL INVITING PEERS AND EXPERT PANELISTS TO RANK 2011
NOMINATED INSTITUTIONS
Email sent on October 20, 2012
1st reminder sent on November 11, 2012
2nd reminder sent on November 24, 2012
3rd reminder sent on November 29, 2011
4th and final reminder sent on November 30, 2012
2012 Ranking Process Closed on November 30, 2012
635 Williams Hall
255 South 36th Street
PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA 19104-6305
TEL. (001) 215 746-2928
EMAIL: Jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
October 20, 2012
Dear Colleague:
I am writing to invite you to help rank the think tanks that have been nominated for the top
think tanks in the world for 2012.
Please use this link to enter the rankings survey
The survey is designed to have a unique signature from your e-mail account making it
possible for us to track response activity from you and other individuals who respond to the
survey.
Please note that your rankings are due on November 20, 2012 and all rankings will be kept
strictly confidential.
I am pleased to report that over 1000 individuals participated in the nominations process
from 105 countries, which resulted in 743 institutions qualifying for consideration across the
38 categories. The distribution of nominations 743 institutions by region is impressive:
Africa (75); Asia (135); Oceania (12); Western Europe (175); Eastern and Central Europe
(83); Latin America (53); Middle East and North Africa (58) and North and Central America
(152)
Thanks to our outreach efforts we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the participation
from journalists, public and private donors and policymakers from Eastern and Central
Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa as demonstrated by the charts provided below.
The impact of this increased participation is reflected in each and every one of the 38
ranking categories.
118
Over the last two months it has taken a marathon of weekends and late nights to compile
the lists of nominees and to consult with members of the Expert Panel to assure the quality
and integrity of the nominations process. As you go through the list you will realize that the
list of nominated institution represents a valuable reference and networking resource that
will only be enhanced by your participation in the next round of 2012 Global Go To Tank
rankings. Our goal is to create a list of the worlds top think tanks that is rigorous,
transparent, representative, inclusive and authoritative.
When ranking the top think tanks in the world, we suggest that you use the criteria provided
and focus on aspects such as the rigor and relevance of the research and analysis produced,
scale of operations, breadth of audience and financial support, contribution of research and
analysis to public debate and the policymaking process, and the organizations overall impact
on public policy.
To help with this process please utilize the following criteria when ranking the nominated
institutions for the 2012 Global Go To Think Tank Index:
Direct relationship between the organizations efforts in a particular area to a positive
change in societal values such as significant changes in quality of life within respective
country (amounts of goods and services available to citizens, state of physical and mental
health, quality of environment, quality of political rights, access to institutions);
Publication of the organizations work in peer-reviewed journals, books and other
authoritative publications;
Ability to retain elite scholars and analysts;
Access to elites in the area of policymaking, media, and academia;
Academic reputation (formal accreditation, citation of think tank; publications by scholars
in major academic books, journals, conferences, and in other professional publications);
Media reputation (number of media appearances, interviews, and citations);
Reputation with policymakers (name recognition with particular issues, number of briefings
and official appointments, policy briefs, legislative testimony delivered);
Level of the organizations financial resources (endowment, membership fees, annual
donations, government and private contracts, earned income),
Ability of the organization to meet the demands of those that fund it or to meet the goals
of its respective grant-making institution;
Overall output of the organization (policy proposals, publications, interviews, conferences,
staff nominated to official posts);
Number of recommendations to policymakers, staff serving advisory roles to policymakers,
awards given to scholars;
Usefulness of the organizations information in advocacy work, preparing legislation or
testimony, preparing academic papers or presentations, conducting research, or teaching;
Organizations ability to produce new knowledge or alternative ideas on policy;
Ability to bridge the gap between academic and policy communities and policymakers and
the public;
Ability to include new voices in the policymaking process;
Ability of the organization to be inscribed within issue and policy networks; and
Success in challenging the traditional wisdom of policymakers and for generating
innovative policy ideas.
119
Your participation in the process helps us recognize centers of excellence in public policy
research, analysis and engagement organizations (think tanks) that are operating in
governments and civil societies around the world.
A few important ground rules:
***You cannot rank your own institution.
***Adhere to professional conduct by revealing and avoiding any potential conflicts of
interest.
***Use the selection criteria provided as a tool when evaluating organizations when ranking
each group of institutions.
***Avoid political, ideological and discipline bias when ranking institutions.
You have 1 month to complete the rankings process. You can reenter the survey as
frequently as you like but YOU MUST KEEP THE ORIGINAL LINK THAT IS
PROVIDED IN THE FRIST PARAGRAPH OF THIS EMAIL. PLEASE NOTE IT IS
UNIQUE TO YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS AND CANNOT BE SHARED WITH
OTHERS. Please complete the rankings process by November 30th, 2012.
Should you have any questions, comments or suggestions dont hesitate to contact me to
discuss them. For more information on the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, please
see the description below. If you feel there is a glowing omission or error please bring it to
our attentions and we will share it with the Expert Panel.
Please note: If you do not wish to receive further emails from us, please click the link below,
and you will be automatically removed from our mailing list
http://www.surveymonkey.com/optout.aspx
Thank you for your participation and continued interest in our research on think tanks and
civil societies around the world.
Sincerely,
James G. McGann
Think Tank and Civil Societies Program
The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the International Relations
Program, University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in
governments and civil societies around the world. TTCSP was established in 1989. TTCSP
maintains a database and network of over 6,500 think tanks in 152 countries. Often referred
to as the think tanks think tank, TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of
public policy research organizations. Over the last 25 years, the Program has developed and
led a series of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between knowledge and
policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security, globalization and
governance, international economics, environmental issues, information and society, poverty
alleviation, and healthcare/global health. These international collaborative efforts are
designed to establish regional and international networks of policy institutes and
communities that improve policy making while strengthening democratic institutions and
civil societies around the world. TTCSP works with leading scholars and practitioners from
120
think tanks and universities in a variety of collaborative efforts and programs and maintains
the worlds leading research database and directory of think tanks. TTCSP produces the
annual Global Go To Think Tank Index that ranks worlds leading think tanks with the help
of a panel of over 1,500 peer institutions and experts from the print and electronic media,
academia, public and private donor institutions, and governments around the world.
121
D. SAMPLE EMAIL TO REGIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL AREA EXPERT
PANEL MEMBERS REQUESTING THEIR REVIEW OF THE PENULTIMATE
2011 LIST OF INSTITUTIONS TO BE RANKED IN ROUND II
Emails sent on or around September 15, 2012
Expert Panel Review Period closed on October 10, 2012
255 South 36th Street
638 Williams Hall
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104
TEL. (215) 746-2928
FAX (215) 732-4401
EMAIL:jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
September 12, 2011
Dear Allison:
I hope all is well with you and your fall semester is off to a great start. Can I ask you to
review the list of nominated think tanks in the following two categories: 1) top think tanks in
Asia and 2) Top Security and International Affairs think tanks and let me know if you find
any errors, translation typos or serious omissions? We are about to launch Round II where
all of the nominated think tanks will be ranked and I want to make sure there are not serious
issues with the list of nominees. Thanks in advance for your assistance with the ranking
process.
All the best,
Jim McGann
2012 Nominated Top Think Tanks in Asia:
Alternate Solutions Institute (Pakistan)
Asan Institute (South Korea)
Asia Forum Japan (AFJ), (Japan)
Asian Development Bank Institute (Japan)
Australian Institute for International Affairs (AIIA) (Australia)
Bangladesh Institute for Development Studies (BIDS), (Bangladesh)
Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace, (Cambodia)
Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceTsinghua Center for Global Policy (China)
Cathay Institute for Public Affairs, (China)
Center for Civil Society (India)
Center for Economic Research (Uzbekistan)
Center for Free Enterprise (South Korea)
Center for International and Strategic Studies and Peking University (China)
Center for Policy Research (India)
122
Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy, (India)
Centre for Independent Studies, (Australia)
Centre for Policy Dialogue, (Bangladesh)
Centre for Policy Research, (India)
Centre for Public Policy Studies (Malaysia)
Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (Indonesia)
Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS), (New Zealand)
Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, (India)
China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) (China)
China Institute for International Studies (CIIS) (China)
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) (China)
Dehli Policy Group (India)
Development Alternatives (India)
Development Institute (KDI) (South Korea)
Development Research Center, State Council, (China)
East Asia Institute (South Korea)
East Asian Institute (Singapore)
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (Indonesia)
Energy Research Institute (TERI) (India)
Foundation for Tolerance International, (Kyrgyzstan)
Hong Kong Centre for Economic Research (Hong Kong)
Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) (India)
Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses (IDSA) (India)
Institute for Foreign Affairs and National Security (IFANS), (South Korea)
Institute for International Policy Studies (Japan)
Institute for National Policy Research (INPR), (Taiwan)
Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, (Nepal)
Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO)
(Japan)
Institute of Economic Growth, (India)
Institute of Governance Studies, (Bangladesh)
Institute of International Policy Studies (IIPS) (Japan)
Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), (India)
Institute of Security and International Studies (ISIS), (Thailand)
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) (Singapore)
Institute of Strategic and Development Studies (ISDS), (Philippines)
Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) (Malaysia)
Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE) (Japan)
Japan Institute for International Development (Japan)
Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) (Japan)
Korea Development Institute (KDI) (South Korea)
Korea Foundation (South Korea)
Korea Institute for Economic Policy (South Korea)
Korea Institute for National Unification (KINU), (South Korea)
Korean Energy Economics Institute (KEEI) (South Korea)
Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) (Singapore)
Liberty Institute (India)
123
Lion Rock Institute (Hong Kong)
Lowy Institute for International Policy (Australia)
National Council of Applied Economic Research, (India)
National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) (Japan)
National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA) (Japan)
Observer Research Foundation (India)
Philippine Institute for Development Studies, (Philippines)
Political Risks Assessment Group, (Kazakhstan)
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), formerly known as FNA Institute of
Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) (Singapore)
Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS) (Sri Lanka)
Research Centre (SHARQ), (Tajikistan)
Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) (Japan)
Shanghai Institute for International Studies (SIIS) (China)
Singapore Institute of International Affairs (ISIS) (Singapore)
Strategic and Defense Studies Centre (SDSC), Australian National University, (Australia)
Sustainable Development Policy Institute, (Pakistan)
Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (Taiwan)
Tokyo Foundation for Global Studies, (Japan)
Unirule Institute for Economics (China)
United Service Institution of India (India)
James G. McGann, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, International Relations Program
Director, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6304
Main Office: 215 898-0452
Direct Line: 215 746-2928
Mobile: 215 206-1799
Email: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
IR Web site: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/irp/
TTCSP Web site: http://gotothinktank.com
124
E. SAMPLE EMAIL TO REGIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL AREA EXPERT
PANEL MEMBERS REQUESTING THEIR REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011
GLOBAL GO TO THINK TANK INDEX
Emails sent on or around December 1, 2012
Expert Panel Review Period Closed in December, 2012
255 South 36th Street
638 Williams Hall
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104
TEL. (215) 746-2928
FAX (215) 732-4401
EMAIL:jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
December 1, 2012
Dear George:
I hope all is well with you. The 2012 rankings process is now complete. I am now seeking
the input of members of the Expert Panel to help review the 2012 Global Go-To Think
Tank Index. Can I please ask you to review the list of the top think tanks in the
following two categories: 1) top think tanks in Africa and 2) International Development
think tanks and let me know if you find any errors, translation typos or other issues I should
be aware of with the institutions that appear on the lists? We are about to draft the final
report and I want to make sure there are not serious issues with the rankings. Thanks in
advance for your assistance with the ranking process.
All the best,
Jim McGann
James G. McGann, Ph.D.
Assistant Director, International Relations Program
Director, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6304
Main Office: 215 898-0452
Direct Line: 215 746-2928
Mobile: 215 206-1799
Email: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu
IR Web site: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/irp/
TTCSP Web site: http://gotothinktank.com
125
BACKGROUND ON THE THINK TANKS AND CIVIL SOCIETIES
PROGRAM
The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) was established in 1989 at the
Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia. In 2008, TTCSP relocated to the
International Relations Program at the University of Pennsylvania. The Program conducts
research on the role policy institutes play in governments and in civil societies around the
world. Often referred to as the think tanks think tank, TTCSP examines the evolving role
and character of public policy research organizations, specializing in researching the
challenges think tanks face and developing strategies and programs to strengthen the
capacity and performance of think tanks worldwide. Over the last twenty-six years, TTCSP
has launched a number of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between
knowledge and policy in critical fields such as international peace and security, globalization
and governance, international economics, environmental protection, information and society,
poverty alleviation, and healthcare. These international collaborative efforts seek to establish
regional and international networks of policy institutions and communities that might help
to improve policymaking and to strengthen democratic institutions and civil societies around
the world. The Program works with some of the leading private foundations,
intergovernmental organizations, think tanks, and universities in the context of a variety of
collaborative efforts and programs. For additional information about our publications and
programs, contact our Director, James G. McGann, at: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu.
Research on Think Tanks and Civil Societies
TTCSP conducts research on the role of think tanks both in the policymaking process
and as key civil society actors in countries around the world.
Think Tank Capacity Building Program (TTCBP)
TTCBP conducts research and provides technical assistance on a wide range of
environmental challenges and organizational development issues facing think tanks and
policy communities around the globe. In addition, TTCBP develops and implements
strategies that help to increase the capacity of think tanks so that they can better serve
policymakers and the public.
Database and Directories
TTCSP developed the first comprehensive, interactive, global, multi-sectoral database and
directory of think tanks. Most databases and directories are organized by discipline,
country, or region. The Program maintains the only multi-sectoral database of think
tanks, consisting of over 11,000 think tanks in over 160 countries. The Program further
has created and maintained specialized databases of think tanks in areas such as
development, democracy, security, international affairs, and healthcare.
126
THE RESEARCH TEAM
PROGRAM DIRECTOR
James G. McGann, Ph.D., is the Assistant Director of the International Relations Program
and the Director of the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of
Pennsylvania. He conducts research on the trends and challenges facing think tanks and
policymakers around the world and provides advice and technical assistance to think tanks,
governments, and public and private donors on how to improve the quality and impact of
policy research. He is also a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a
Philadelphia-based think tank. Prior to coming to the University of Pennsylvania, Dr.
McGann was an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Villanova University, where he
taught courses on international relations, international organizations, and international law.
Dr. McGann has served as a consultant and advisor to the World Bank, United Nations,
United States Agency for International Development, the Soros, Rockefeller, MacArthur,
Hewlett, and Gates Foundations, the Carnegie Corporation, and various foreign
governments on the role of non-governmental, public policy, and public engagement
organizations in civil society. He has served as the Senior Vice President for the Executive
Council on Foreign Diplomats, the Public Policy Program Officer for the Pew Charitable
Trusts, the Assistant Director of the Institute of Politics at the John F. Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University, and a senior advisor to the Citizens Network for Foreign
Affairs and the Society for International Development.
Among Dr. McGanns publications are Competition for Dollars, Scholars, and
Influence in the Public Policy Research Industry (University Press of America 1995); The
International Survey of Think Tanks (Foreign Policy Research Institute 1999); Think Tanks
and Civil Societies: Catalyst for Ideas and Action, co-edited with Kent B. Weaver
(Transaction Publishers 2000); Comparative Think Tanks, Politics, and Public Policy
(Edward Elgar 2005); Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the U.S.: Academics, Advisors, and
Advocates (Routledge 2007); Global Trends and Transitions: 2007 Survey of Think Tanks
(Foreign Policy Research Institute 2008); Think Tank Index (Foreign Policy Magazine 2009);
The 2008 Global Go To Think Tank Rankings (IRP, University of Pennsylvania 2009);
Democratization and Market Reform: Think Tanks as Catalysts (Routledge 2009); Catalysts
for Economic Growth and Development: The Role of Think Tanks in Brazil, Russia, India,
China and South Africa (CIPE 2009); The 2009 Global Go To Think Tank Rankings (IRP,
University of Pennsylvania 2010); and Global Think Tanks, Policy Networks and
Governance (Routledge 2010).
127
RESEARCH INTERNS
Aaron Schwartzbaum
Alexandra Jeszeck
Andrew Metrick
Courtney McMahon
Debby Chiang
Jillian Rafferty
John Colavita
Kari Abromitis
Laura Bove
Mariana Frias
Ola Aboukhsaiwan
Sandra Mazlagic
Sophie Kim
Tim Connors
128
THINK TANK AND CIVIL SOCIETIES PROGRAM
The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) examines the role policy institutes
play in governments and in civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the think
tanks think tank, TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy
research organizations. Over the last 25 years the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
has laid the foundation for a global initiative that will help bridge the gap between
knowledge and policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security,
globalization and governance, international economics, environment, information and
society, poverty alleviation and health. This international collaborative effort is designed to
establish regional and international networks of policy institutes and communities that will
improve policymaking and strengthen democratic institutions and civil societies around the
world. The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program works with some of the leading
scholars and practitioners from think tanks and universities in a variety of collaborative
efforts and programs.
THINK TANKS AND CIVIL SOCIETIES PROGRAM 2013, University of
Pennsylvania, International Relations Program
All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this document and presentation may
be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written
permission from the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program.
All requests, questions and comments should be sent to:
James G. McGann, Ph.D.
Director
Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
International Relations Program
University of Pennsylvania
635 Williams Hall
255 S. 36
th
Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1-215-746-2928 or +1-215-732 3774 ext. 209
Email: jmcgann@sas.upenn.edu