0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
826 просмотров2 страницы
A review of the new book by 4-star General Tony Zinni (ret.), former chief of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) and Tony Koltz; subtitled "How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield" (Palgrave Macmillan, September 2014). bks says "Not as hopeful as I'd wanted to believe."
Оригинальное название
bksreads Before the First Shots Are Fired, by Gen. Tony Zinni
A review of the new book by 4-star General Tony Zinni (ret.), former chief of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) and Tony Koltz; subtitled "How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield" (Palgrave Macmillan, September 2014). bks says "Not as hopeful as I'd wanted to believe."
A review of the new book by 4-star General Tony Zinni (ret.), former chief of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) and Tony Koltz; subtitled "How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield" (Palgrave Macmillan, September 2014). bks says "Not as hopeful as I'd wanted to believe."
ou know that saying that, to a child with a hammer,
all the world looks like a nail? General Tony Zinni, USArmy (Ret.) has convinced me that, to a man whos spent his whole adult life in the military, all the world looks like a war or something best solved by war. I had hoped to find a vision for solving the problems of the world without resort to arms. What the book offers instead of that vision is a de- tailed memoir and justification of Gen. Zinnis role in USAmericas military ventures from Vietnam through Afghanistan. He is directly critical of George W. Bushs administration and flat-out accuses Vice President Cheney of proceeding with the invasion of Iraq on a false basis because there was no question of present weapons of mass destruction. Zinni is also highly crit- ical of President Obamas policies and performance, though he seems to know no more than I do about how decisions have actually been made in the Obama White House. He settles for taking news reports as presenting the whole story. I hope the book as published includes an index, be- cause for someone who doesnt regularly follow mili- tary history, the names and places can get badly tangled. Gen. Zinni names many other military figures, usually with a summary of their backgrounds and al- most always with information about when Zinni worked with him and what he thought of him (always him). He blatantly idolizes Gen. George Marshall. Zinni does speak several times about the need to win the hearts and minds, and then some, of the peo- ple in whose countries we fight. He speaks movingly of getting to know Vietnamese villagers when he was a lieutenant advisor to their nations Marine corps. But he gives no anecdotes of what he learned from them. He does quote Mao Zedong as giving the greatest im- portance in waging war to the people, and he assumes that Ho Chi Minh agreed and acted strategically on that knowledge. By contrast, Zinni says he hoped the US forces would win the peoples courage, commitment, and ha- tred of the enemy. The enemy? That would be the other Vietnamese, the people with whom they shared what Zinni calls a nation dominated by first the French, then the Japanese, then the French again, ending in the French Indo-China War and the division of the coun- try. Having some experience with how Koreans feel about the division of their country, I very much doubt that enmity was the primary attitude of South Viet- namese toward North Vietnamese. Yet this seems to have not been part of what General Zinni learned from so deep in their culture. Again, after putting a human face on the US mili- tary in the Persian Gulf as combat commander for the whole region Zinni says he thinks he knew how the locals felt. He blames the European powers for screwing up the region after World War I, leaving the US as the cop on the block. He speaks more clearly of the culture of US Military commanders and how it is disrupted when presidents are elected and appoint their own National Security Advisers, chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Sec- retaries of Defense. And thats not to mention the trou- ble caused by diplomats. But while John Kerry, with his military background, is portrayed sympathetically around the Russian seizure of Crimea, and Madeleine Albright is given a chapter epigraph and a brief men- tion in the text immediately following, Hillary Clinton is mentioned only once, and that in company with Sec- retary of Defense Robert Gates, at least in the Advance Review Copy of the book. How could a whole six?-year bksreads Before the First Shots are Fired Gen. Tony Zinni and Tony Koltz Palgrave Macmillan,* Sept. 2014 Book Reviews by Barbara Kellam-Scott September 6, 2014 *This review is based on one of 25 Advance Reader Copies provided by the publisher through the Early Re- viewer program at LibraryThing.com. No other consider- ation was provided by the publisher or author to the reviewer. The review contains many direct quotes to cap- tur the authors style, but they are not indicated because they are not verified as appearing in the final edition. service as the nations top diplomat be left out? Im afraid it appears to me that its because shes a woman with no military experience and perhaps without the admiration for the military that Zinni demands. Or maybe he just never met her. Clearly, General Zinni thinks the military could do much better without such oversight, or with politicians who listened better to the military. And he speaks even worse of journalists resisting proper information and wanting to get too close to the action. The real gap in General Zinnis cast of characters, though, is the boots on the ground. They do get a paragraph early in the book, where Gen. Zinni com- plains about how easy the troops have it in foreign de- ployments today, returning from battle to bases he compares to US shopping malls. And he seems to blame the speed with which they jet home from combat for the epidemic of post-traumatic stress disorders. He never mentions being wounded, being ambushed, see- ing carnage. He does contend that a commander in chief who has never been shot at lacks a visceral under- standing of the decisions he has to make about war, but he doesnt tell us how his own experience of being shot at may have colored his command decisions. Only in his closing chapters does he even mention the burden on people separated from their families. Zinni gives a few pages consideration to the way Na- tional Guard and Reserve troops were used in Iraq and Afghanistan. (He disapproves.) But he values them most for their greater maturity and higher education that the regular troops. He quotes his son celebrating a surgeon called up in 2007 to the rank of corporal. The mechanical engineer with Shell Oil was an officer, and apparently more useful because of his connections. There is a brief moment in chapter two, in the con- text of the invasion of Iraq, when Zinni toys with ques- tioning why its so easy to respond with military force. He criticizes politicians and generals who never met an intervention they didnt like. But he acknowl- edges that having the most powerful military in the world is its own temptation to use it. That second chapter may be the best part of the book. In it, General Zinni (or perhaps Mr. Koltz) takes us back to the founding of our nation as inwardly fo- cused. But the distances that separated us from other powerful nations were greater then, and we had no need of their colonial ambitions, what with a whole continent before us. But after just a couple of para- graphs, and with no mention of our own use of weapons of mass destruction, Zinni is celebrating our rebuilding the societies of our WWII enemies. Hope gets another cameo in chapter five, as a criticism of militarized foreign policy. Yet General Zinni contends that a high level of strategic thinking has been absent from US political thinking and planning since the end of the Cold War. What has certainly been lacking in that time is what Gen. Zinni calls an existential threat, but he doesnt seem to have noticed. He includes a dramatic section on the battle of the narrative as a new dimension to war. But his treatment of information technologies and shaping of opinion, especially in the decade since he retired, is the weakest portion of the book, settling for generalizations. No, the section on cyberwar, separated off into the next chapter, is even more vague. The difference he misses is how few of the chal- lenges in the world in the 21st century are from nations that can understand the potential of nuclear deterrents or air and sea dominance, or can form alliances and civil partnerships and share in global goals. He ad- dresses the issue in chapter three, as one of context that we cannot know. And late in the book, describing the new battlefield, he pays lip service to enemy move- ments and gangs that dont play by the rules taught in military academies. He says they are less interested in geography and advancing lines, but then he argues for more attention to geography and advancing lines. What disappoints me most about the book is that General Zinni seems to accept that there will always come a crisis, and a time in each crisis, when resolu- tion will depend on shots being fired, and fired by US- Americas military. And because of that certainty, we will be required to maintain the largest, most powerful military force on the planet. General Zinni spent his finest years as a combat commander, even when there was no identified war going on. And he is quite clear that he knows how to fight future wars, and con- struct future pauses in war and geographical shifts in where the war is, more efficiently and effectively than weve done it at least since the good war of the 1940s. I was really hoping he might have seen an en- tirely different way for the world to run. Before the First Shots Are Fired 2 bksreads