Memorandum

Date: 09/16/14
To: Professor Cohen
From: Mariel Melchor
Subject: Plans for RevisionInquiry into Kinesiology

Based on the feedback I received from two other fellow classmates and from
my professor, I dont consider it necessary to make any changes to my secondary
research questions. My peer review editors consider my questions to be thought-
provoking, which will lead to further inquiry. The questions are not too broad or too
narrow, meaning that the questions focus on the categories individually, providing
insight into each and every one of them. Thus, my research shall provide the
necessary answers to my topic of inquiry, and much more.