LAB REPORT/SCIENTIFIC PROCESS RUBRIC

Individual
Performance Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard
Above
Standard

Title Title is completely erroneous,

irrelevant, or missing.

Title of the lab is a general description
of the purpose

Title of the lab is descriptive, and
representative of the purpose; clearly
incorporates the experiments variables


Background
Research
Material is directly copied rather than
put into students own words and/or
background sources are cited
incorrectly.

A few reputable background sources
are used and cited correctly. Material is
translated into student's own words.
Several reputable background sources
were used and cited correctly. Material
is translated into student's own words.

Question/
Purpose
The purpose of the lab or the question
to be answered during the lab is
partially identified, and is stated in a
somewhat unclear manner.
The purpose of the lab or the question
to be answered during the lab is
identified, but is stated in a somewhat
unclear manner.

The purpose of the lab or the question
to be answered during the lab is clearly
identified and stated.

Hypothesis Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results has
been stated, but appears to be based on
flawed logic.
Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results is
reasonable based on general
knowledge and observations.
Hypothesis is written as an Ifthen
statement.

Hypothesized relationship between the
variables and the predicted results is
clear and reasonable based on what has
been studied. Hypothesis is written as
an Ifthen because statement.

Variables Variables are not described OR the
majority lack sufficient detail.
Most variables are clearly described
with most relevant details.
All variables are clearly identified and
described with all relevant details
(including how the DV will be
measured).


Materials Many materials are described
inaccurately OR are not described at all.
Almost all materials and the setup used
in the experiment are clearly and
accurately described.
All materials and setup used in the
experiment are clearly and accurately
described.


Experimental
Design
Experimental design is not relevant to
the hypothesis.

Several steps are not outlined AND
there is not enough detail to replicate
procedures.
Experimental design is adequate to test
the hypothesis, but leaves some
unanswered questions.

All steps are outlined, but there is not
enough detail to replicate procedures.
Experimental design is a well-
constructed test of the stated
hypothesis.

Procedures appear to be replicable.
Steps are outlined sequentially and are
adequately detailed.

Data Data is represented in written form, but
no graphs or tables are presented.

No calculations included.
Accurate representation of the data in
tables and/or graphs. Graphs and
tables may be missing a title, labels, or
units.

Some calculations missing or
inaccurate/unclear.
Professional looking and accurate
representation of the data in tables
and/or graphs using Excel. Graphs and
tables are labeled and titled and include
units.

Sample calculations with work shown,
when applicable.


Conclusion Conclusion includes little information
about what was learned from the
experiment.
Conclusion includes whether the
findings supported the hypothesis and
what was learned from the experiment.
Conclusion includes whether the
findings supported the hypothesis,
possible sources of error (see below),
and answers the purpose question
accurately and clearly.

Contains new questions and reflection
about the topic and/or suggestions to
improve or further build upon this
experiment.


Error
Analysis
There is little or no discussion of errors. Experimental errors and their possible
effects are discussed.
Experimental errors, their possible
effects, and ways to reduce errors are
discussed.


Mechanics Many errors in spelling, punctuation
and/or grammar in the report
Few errors in spelling, punctuation
and/or grammar in the report

No errors in spelling, punctuation
and/or grammar in the report

Journal/
Notebook
Notes rarely taken or of little use. Dated, notes are taken occasionally, but
accuracy of notes might be
questionable.
Clear, accurate, dated notes are taken
regularly.

Appearance/
Organization
Lab report is handwritten and looks
sloppy with cross-outs, multiple
erasures and/or tears and creases.
Lab report is neatly written or typed,
but formatting does not help visually
organize the material.
Lab report is typed and uses headings
and subheadings to visually organize
the material. It appears professional.