Rubric for Political Webquest

4 3 2 1
Research Research is cited
properly. Research is
used in an
appropriate manner.
Research has been
analyzed for accuracy
and reliability.
Research has been
cited but 1 or 2
mistakes. Research
has been used in a
mostly appropriate
manner. Evidence of
research skills.
Research has more
than 2 citation
mistakes. Research
has been used
inappropriately.
Research has been
done but not
effectively.
Research has little to
no citation. Research
used inappropriately
or not used. Little
evidence of research.
Group Work Cooperated within
group. Demonstrated
leadership skills and
resolved conflicts
peacefully.
Participated equally
in group.
Cooperated within
group. Leadership
skills not found but
conflicts resolved
peacefully.
Participation less
equal in group.
Some cooperation
within group.
Conflicts sometimes
resolved peacefully.
Participation varies in
group.
Little to no
cooperation. Conflicts
arose and were not
resolved peacefully.
Little to no
participation.
Platform Well thought out. Fits
within the ideology
chosen. Original
ideas. Relevant to
current society.
Thought out. Fits
within the ideology
chosen. Some new
ideas. Relevant to
current society.
Evidence of original
thought. Deviates a
little from ideology
chosen. Platform has
less relevance to
current society.
Little to no evidence
of original thought.
Deviates from
ideology chosen.
Little relevance to
current society.
Poster Expresses their
partys goals
accurately. Has all the
characteristics listed
on webquest and
more. Creativity
shown. Easy to read,
good presentation,
attractive design.
Expresses their party.
Has all the
characteristics listed
on the webquest.
Creativity shown. Less
organized, however,
design is still
attractive.
Has party name. 1 or
2 characteristics are
missing. Poster is
acceptably attractive
but messy and
disorganized.
Missing more than 2
characteristics from
webquest. Does not
relate to the party.
Poorly designed,
disorganized,
unattractive.
Presentation Party well introduced.
Speaks clearly,
appropriate volume
and pacing, eye
contact throughout
presentation. Ideas
presented in
organized sequence.
Information is
accurate and
relevant.
Party introduced
satisfactorily. Speaks
clearly and loud
enough to hear.
Frequently makes eye
contact. Information
is accurate and
relevant.
Party is introduced.
Speaker can be
heard. Some eye
contact. Information
covers most of the
issues but is lacking in
details.
Party is not
introduced. Speaker
difficult to hear and
understand. Little to
no eye contact.
Reading rather than
presenting. Exhibits
little to no knowledge
of information.