0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
8 просмотров1 страница
The letter discusses issues that arose during a job interview at The Natural Rendez-Vous Company. The applicant had difficulty with some specialized vocabulary questions due to problems with the interpreter. Specifically, the interpreter did not fully translate answers regarding the differences between natural and synthetic cosmetics, and commented on the applicant's answer about pH levels rather than interpreting it. The applicant believes the questions required technical answers and communication was limited by the interpreter's lack of specialized knowledge. They hope to have another opportunity to interview without these interpretation problems.
The letter discusses issues that arose during a job interview at The Natural Rendez-Vous Company. The applicant had difficulty with some specialized vocabulary questions due to problems with the interpreter. Specifically, the interpreter did not fully translate answers regarding the differences between natural and synthetic cosmetics, and commented on the applicant's answer about pH levels rather than interpreting it. The applicant believes the questions required technical answers and communication was limited by the interpreter's lack of specialized knowledge. They hope to have another opportunity to interview without these interpretation problems.
The letter discusses issues that arose during a job interview at The Natural Rendez-Vous Company. The applicant had difficulty with some specialized vocabulary questions due to problems with the interpreter. Specifically, the interpreter did not fully translate answers regarding the differences between natural and synthetic cosmetics, and commented on the applicant's answer about pH levels rather than interpreting it. The applicant believes the questions required technical answers and communication was limited by the interpreter's lack of specialized knowledge. They hope to have another opportunity to interview without these interpretation problems.
I am writing this letter to you as company compared to some of the issues presented in my interview. I had an interview with company director and his interpreter. So during the interview i had a problem with specialized vocabulary when I thought that the interpreter couldnt help me, but also causing difficulties in the interview. With the question: "Differences of natural cosmetics and cosmetic synthetic" with the answer synthetic products contain antioxidant for unstable free radicals over time and easy to cause toxicity to the skin while natural products do not. however, the interpreter did not translate verbatim, but only say the word "element". With the question: What pH is . The answer "concentration of the solution that the user safety" I received remarks interpreter is not reasonable the answer and the answers should be acid or base concentration. During the interview, the interpreter asked me to reply in words popular rather than majors, I think these questions are to be answered by specialized. However, in the words of specialized communication is limited and dont well known interpreter. Besides interpreter also decide for himself without asking the opinion of the director. I really want to work with the company, so I hope have a chance to work, your success is my dream