Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 26
Amoeba
Humans
Goal:
Determine Evolutionary History (Phylogeny) of Life
Description
= assign features
Character = a feature (e.g., petal color)
Character states = two or more forms of a
character (e.g., red, white).
Identification
= associate an unknown with a known
How? One way:
Taxonomic Key, e.g.,
Tree . Species A
Leaves simple . Species B
Leaves pinnate ....... Species C
Herb
Flowers red . Species D
Flowers white ... Species E
Nomenclature
Naming, according to a formal system.
Binomial: Species are two names (Linnaeus):
E.g., Homo sapiens
Homo = genus name
sapiens = specific epithet
Homo sapiens = species name
Nomenclature
Hierarchical Ranks:
Domain
Kingdom
Phylum
Class
Order
Family
Genus
Species
Classification
Placing objects, e.g., life, into some type of
order.
Taxon = a taxonomic group (plural = taxa).
Phylogenetic classification
Based on known (inferred) evolutionary
history.
Advantage:
Classification reflects pattern of evolution
Classification not ambiguous
lineage
or clade
TIME
TAXA
lineage
or clade
TIME
TAXA
TIME
speciation
Fig. 26-5
Branch point
(node)
Taxon A
Taxon B
Taxon C
ANCESTRAL
LINEAGE
Taxon D
Taxon E
Taxon F
Common ancestor of
taxa AF
Polytomy
Sister
taxa
Principle of Parsimony
That cladogram (tree) having the fewest number
of steps (evolutionary changes) is the one
accepted.
Okhams razor: the simplest explanation, with
fewest number of ad hoc hypotheses, is
accepted.
TAXA
E
apomorphy
(for Taxon D)
apomorphies
(for Taxa B & C)
TIME
apomorphy
(for Taxa B,C,D,E,F)
Tuna
Leopard
Lancelet
(outgroup)
Vertebral column
(backbone)
Hinged jaws
Lamprey
Tuna
Vertebral
column
Salamander
Hinged jaws
1
Turtle
Hair
Amniotic egg
Leopard
Hair
Fig. 26-11
Deletion
Insertion
Fig. 26-8a
Fig. 26-8b
Homology
Similarity resulting from common ancestry.
E.g., the forelimb bones of a bird, bat, and cat.
Homoplasy (analogy)
Similarity not due to common ancestry
Reversal loss of new (apomorphic) feature,
resembles ancestral (old) feature.
Convergence (parallelism) gain of new,
similar features independently.
Convergent evolution:
spines of cacti & euphorbs
Cactus
Euphorb
Convergent evolution:
spines of cacti & euphorbs
euphorb spines
cactus spines
Leg-less lizards
Both examples of reversal within Tetrapods:
loss of a derived feature forelimbs.
Example of convergence relative to one another!
Independently evolved.
Snake
snakes
legged
lizards
leg-less
lizards
*
*= loss of legs
Convergent evolution:
wings of some animals evolved independently
Fig. 26-7
Convergent evolution:
Australian mole and N. Am. mole
Ancestral gene
Gene Duplication
can occur!
Ancestral species
Speciation with
divergence of gene
Species A
Orthologous genes
Species B
Orthology
genes
homologous
Species A
Gene duplication and divergence
Paralogous genes
Species A after many generations
(b) Paralogous genes
Fig. 26-18
Paralogy
genes not
homologous
Common ancestry
TAXA
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
Monophyletic Group
a group consisting of:
a common ancestor +
all descendents of that common ancestor
TAXA
monophyletic
group
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
TAXA
monophyletic
group
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
TAXA
monophyletic
group
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
TAXA
monophyletic
group
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
TAXA
monophyletic
group
TIME
common ancestor
(of taxon D, E, & F)
common ancestor
(of taxon A & taxa B-F)
TAXA
TIME
speciation
TAXA
C
A
BB
FC
DE
ED
TIME
speciation
FA
Fig. 26-13
One can date divergence times with molecular clock and fossils
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Human
Mouse
PALEOZOIC
542
MESOZOIC
251
CENOZOIC
65.5
Present
Relationship
= recency of common ancestry
i.e., taxa sharing a common ancestor
more recent in time are more closely related
than those sharing common ancestors more
distant in time.
Example:
Are fish more closely related to sharks or to
humans?
Shark
TIME
Fish
Humans
Shark
Fish
Humans
TIME
common ancestor of
Fish and Humans
common ancestor of
Sharks, Fish, and Humans
Vertebrata
Osteichthyes
Shark
TIME
Fish
Humans
monophyletic
group
common ancestor of
Fish and Humans
common ancestor of
Sharks, Fish, and Humans
Example:
Are crocodyles more closely related to lizards
or to birds?
Turtles
Lizards &
Snakes
Crocodyles
Birds
"Reptilia"
Turtles
Lizards &
Snakes
Crocodyles
Birds
Paraphyletic group
Consist of common ancestor but not all
descendents
Paraphyletic groups are unnatural, distort
evolutionary history, and should not be
recognized.
"Reptilia"
Turtles
Lizards &
Snakes
Crocodyles
Birds
Lizards &
Snakes
Crocodyles
Birds
Reptilia
Turtles
Lizards &
Snakes
Crocodyles
Birds
Reptilia
Turtles
Lizards &
Snakes
Dinosaurs
Crocodyles
Birds
Importance of a name:
Did humans evolve from apes?
Orangatan Gorilla
Chimpanzees Humans
Pongidae
Hominidae
Great Apes
Orangatan Gorilla Chimpanzees Humans
Pongidae
Pongidaeor
Hominidae
Great
Apes
Orangatan Gorilla
Chimpanzees Humans
Pongidae or
Hominidae
Orangatan Gorilla
Chimpanzees Humans
Pongidae or
Hominidae
Orangatan Gorilla
Chimpanzees Humans
E.g., schistosomiasis
Schistosomiasis:
knowledge of species
diversity and evolutionary
history of primary host can
aid in controlling parasite
(Schistosoma, a fluke)
lineage
or clade
TIME
lineage
or clade
TIME