Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
MOLASSES
Liquor left after the crystallization of sugarcane
juice
Dark colored viscous liquid
Contains 79.5% fermentable sugar
MOLASSES - FERMENTATION
1
201.22
4
1
34.34 g ethanol
1
(
)
0.789
43.53mL ethanol
46.068
1
SUCROSE - FERMENTATION
4
1
20.19 g ethanol
46.068
1
1
(
)
0.789
25.59 mL ethanol
GLUCOSE - FERMENTATION
1
180.156
19.178 g
2
46.068
1
1
1
ethanol (
) =
0.789
24.31mL ethanol
METHODOLOGY
MATERIALS NEEDED
Molasses
Glucose
Sucrose
Saccharomyces
cerevisae
MgSO4 x 7H2O
Distilled water
autoclave
Conc. H3PO4
Glucose/yeast/peptone
agar and broth
Erylenmeyer flask
pH meter
Incubator / fermentation
setup
+ 1g of urea,
MgSO4 x 7H2O
and KH2PO4
Dissolve in
500 mL
Adjust pH of
worts to 4 using
conc. H3PO4
autoclave
Divide wort to 2
flasks
Autoclave and
store until use
Inoculate
Sacccharomyces
cerevisae into GYP
agar for 24 hours
Inoculate yeast
culture from GYP
agar to GYP broth
for 24 hours
Leave to ferment
RESULTS
Wort
mL
Collected
Day 7
mL
collected
Day 9
mL
collected
Day 18
Average
Molasses
0.667
Sucrose
2.5
1.167
Glucose
1.000
250mL
wort
Molasses
30mL
Day 7
10/27/2014
Day 9
10/29/2014
Day 18
11/7/2014
Average
Sucrose
30mL
Glucose
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
30mL
Vol. collected
0mL
0mL
0mL
mL EtOH
0%
0%
0%
% EtOH
30mL
30mL
30mL
Vol. collected
1mL
2.5mL
2mL
mL EtOH
3.33%
8.33%
6.66%
% EtOH
30mL
30mL
30mL
Vol. collected
1mL
1mL
1mL
mL EtOH
3.33%
3.33%
3.33%
% EtOH
30mL
30mL
30mL
Vol. collected
0.67mL
1.16mL
1mL
mL EtOH
2.23%
3.87%
3.33%
% EtOH
100
1000
Where:
Vb = volume of wort in flask (L)
Ab = volume of ethanol collected
Mm = mass of sugar used
m = Fermentable sugars content (std value)
% Ethanol =
x 100
Day 7
% Ethanol =
% Ethanol =
0
30
x 100
x 100 = 0%
Day 9
% Ethanol =
x 100
1
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.33%
30
Day 18
% Ethanol =
x 100
1
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.33%
30
AVERAGE
% Ethanol =
x 100
0.67
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 2.23 %
30
Day 7
%
Ethanol =
x 100
0
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 0%
30
% Ethanol =
% Ethanol =
2.5
30
x 100
x 100 = 8.33%
Day 18
% Ethanol =
x 100
1
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.33%
30
AVERAGE
% Ethanol =
x 100
1.167
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.87 %
30
Day 7
%
Ethanol =
x 100
0
% Ethanol = x 100 = 0%
30
Day 9
% Ethanol =
x 100
2
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 6.67%
30
Day 18
% Ethanol =
x 100
1
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.33%
30
AVERAGE
% Ethanol =
x 100
1
% Ethanol =
x 100 = 3.33 %
30
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
1
2.5
2
Day 18
1
1
1
mL of ethanol
collected
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
16.67
71.67
33.33
Day 18
16.67
16.67
16.67
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
3.33
8.33
6.67
Day 18
3.33
3.33
3.33
Average
2.23
3.87
3.33
Day 7
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0
0.0000375 0.795
=0
Day 9
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01667
0.0000375 0.795
Yf = 279.581
0.008335
0.0000298
Day 18
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01667
0.008335
=
0.0000375 0.795 0.0000298
Yf = 279.581
AVERAGE
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01167
0.005835
=
0.0000375 0.795 0.0000298
Yf = 195.740
Day 7
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0
0.0000375 1.000
=0
Day 9
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.04167
0.020835
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 555.600
Day 18
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01667
0.008335
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 222.267
AVERAGE
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01933
0.00967
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 257.733
Day 7
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0
0.0000375 1.000
=0
Day 9
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.03333
0.01667
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 444.400
Day 18
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01667
0.008335
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 222.267
AVERAGE
Yf =
Yf =
0.5 0.01667
0.008335
=
0.0000375 1.000 0.0000375
Yf = 222.267
DISCUSSION
Fermentation Yield (L/ton)
Fermentation Yield
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
279.581
555.6
444.4
Day 18
279.581
222.267
222.267
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
279.581
555.6
444.4
Day 18
279.581
222.267
222.267
Average
195.74
257.733
222.267
0.794
0.511
100
1000
Day 7
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
Ef = 0 x
x
= 0%
0.511 1000
Day 9
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
279.581 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 43.44%
43.44%
Day 18
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
279.581 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 43.44%
43.44%
AVERAGE
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
195.740 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 30.41%
30.41%
Day 7
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
Ef = 0 x
x
= 0%
0.511 1000
Day 9
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
555.600 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 86.33%
86.33%
Day 18
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
222.267 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 34.54%
34.54%
AVERAGE
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
257.733 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 40.05%
40.05%
Day 7
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
Ef = 0 x
x
= 0%
0.511 1000
Day 9
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
444.400 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 69.05%
69.05%
Day 18
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
222.267 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 34.54%
34.54%
AVERAGE
Ef =
0.794
100
Ef = Yf x
x
0.511 1000
0.794
100
222.267 x
x
=
0.511 1000
Ef = 34.54%
34.54%
Fermentation Efficiency
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
43.44
86.33
69.05
Day 18
43.44
34.54
34.54
Molasses
Sucrose
Glucose
Day 7
0
0
0
Day 9
43.44
86.33
69.05
Day 18
43.44
34.54
34.54
Average
30.41
40.05
34.54
CONCLUSION
% Ethanol
Yf (L/ton)
Ef(%)
Day 7
0%
0%
Day 9
3.33 %
Day 18
3.33 %
0 (L/ton)
279.581
(L/ton)
279.581
(L/ton)
Average
2.23 %
195.540
(L/ton)
43.44%
43.44%
30.41%
| |
x
|11.17 43.53|
=
x 100
43.53
32.36
=
x 100
42.53
= 0.7609 x 100
= 76.09% error
100
% Ethanol
Yf (L/ton)
Ef(%)
Day 7
0%
0%
Day 9
8.33 %
Day 18
3.33 %
0 (L/ton)
555.600
(L/ton)
222.267
(L/ton)
Average
3.87 %
257.733
(L/ton)
86.33 %
34.54 %
40.05%
| |
x
|19.33 25.59|
=
x 100
25.59
6.26
=
x 100
25.59
= 0.2446 x 100
= 24.46% error
100
% Ethanol
Yf (L/ton)
Ef(%)
Day 7
0%
0%
Day 9
6.67 %
Day 18
16.67 %
0 (L/ton)
444.400
(L/ton)
222.267
(L/ton)
Average
16.67 %
222.267
(L/ton)
69.05 %
34.54 %
34.54%
| |
x
|16.67 24.31|
=
x 100
24.31
7.64
=
x 100
24.31
= 0.3143 x 100
= 31.43% error
100
CONCLUSION
Based from results, the second day collected
the most ethanol from the three samples
Sucrose ended up producing the most ethanol
from the three wort solutions
of oxygen (aerobic)
REFERENCES
The Sugar Engineers. (2014). Distillery Yields.
Retrieved on November 8, 2014 from
http://www.sugartech.com/alcohol/yields.php
The Fermentation of Sugar and the Isolation of
Ethanol through Distillation. Retrieved on
November 8, 2014 from
http://web.fscj.edu/Milczanowski/ten/ETHANO
L.pdf
REFERENCES
Periyasamy, S., Sivakumar, V., Ramasamy, S.
(2009) Production of Bio-ethanol from Sugar
Molasses Using Saccharomyces cerevisae.
Modern Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 8
Patrascu, ., Rapeanu, R., Hopulele, T. (2009)
Current Approaches to Efficient Biotechnological
Production of Ethanol. Innovative Romanian Food
Technology. Vol. 4
REFFERENCES
Lin, Y., Zhang, W., Li, C., Sakakibara K., Tanaka
S., Kong, H. (2011) Factors Affecting ethanol
fomation using Saccharomyces cervsiae.
Science Direct, 2012
Amin, R., Saquib, H., Sarker, M. (2013)
Simulation of Ethanol Production by
Fermentation of Molasses. Journal of
Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4 ISSN: 2325-0224
THANK YOU
GROUP 4 : 3A-BIOCHEMISTRY