Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
B. Are there any facts that you would like to know but that are not revealed in
the opinion?
Do the plaintiffs have an issue with having a mentally retarded child?
Would they have done something different if they knew she was positive for
rubella?
III.Issues
A. What are the precise issues being litigated, as stated by the court?
Malpractice dismissed due to section 21.1
B. Do you agree with the way the court has framed those issues?
Yes, if there was a statue that defended it theres nothing to be done.
IV.Holding
A. What is the courts precise holding?
The trial court dropped the case.
B. What is its rationale for that decision?
The statue was not tolled therefore complaints were dismissed.
C. Do you agree with that rationale?
Yes, because I feel that all claims that was upon was very accurate.
V.Implications
A. What does this case mean for healthcare today?
Limitation statues are more extensive.
B. What were its implications when the decision was announced?
C. How should healthcare administrators prepare to deal with these
implications?
D. What would be different today if the case had been decided differently?