Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CRD 3.5 Coordinate procurement, production, distribution, and service of goods and services
CRD 4.7 Propose and use procedures as appropriate to the practice setting to reduce waste
and protect the environment
3. Participate in ingredient control. Perform a yield analysis of a main menu or bakery item.1
Because food items are perishable, food service operations purchase food, beverages and other items on a
day-to-day basis. Buying the right amount, at the right time, reduces the amount of cash tied up in inventory,
prevents waste and spoilage, and saves space in dry storage and cooling units.
One way food service organizations know how much product to order, and when to order that product, is
through the use of menus and standard recipes. WAMC uses a 3 week cyclic menu. For each meal, standard
recipes are used by employees to ensure that their preparations of entres, side items, desserts, etc. are
precise. A standard recipe is a formula used to produce a food item the same way, in both quality and
quantity every time. Standard recipes should list the amounts required of ingredients after the peel, core, fat
or other inedible portion is removed. If a recipe is prepared using the same preparation method, and the
same quality and quantity of food, a standard yield can be expected. A standard yield can be expressed as a
quantity (3 gallons) or by the number of portions it produces (48-8 oz. bowls).
In order to determine how much a recipe costs to produce, and how much profit it should generate, a yield
analysis should be done first on all individual ingredients. Though time consuming, a yield analysis will tell you
how many edible portions an ingredient or whole food item will produce and how much those portions will
cost. In order to perform a yield analysis you will need to obtain the As Purchased Cost, the As Purchased
Weight, and the Standard Portion Size or required recipe amount (in ounces). The standard recipe and
purchasing documents will supply this information.
The following is a yield analysis or yield test for a WAMC food item:
Weight/lbs.
Yield %
Total Weight
1.5 lbs
100%
Trim Loss
Edible Product
1.5 lbs
1.5 lbs
# of
Portions
Edible
Cost/lb.
Edible
Cost Factor
Cost/Portion per lb.
Cost Factor
per portion
$2.74
$1.03
.375
1.0
time the As Purchased Cost fluctuates. By understanding the relationship between the Edible Cost and the
As Purchased Cost originally paid, you should be able to recalculate the new Edible Cost, without performing
a new yield test whenever the As Purchased Cost changes. For example:
Cost Factor per Pound X New as Purchased Cost per Pound = New Edible Cost per Pound
Cost Factor per Portion X New as Purchased Cost per Pound = New Edible Cost per Portion
Where the Yield Test determines the costs prior to the cooking process, a Cooking Loss Test can be used to
determine the cost and number of portions for products that need to be cooked before portioning and
serving. This is most often used for roasts and poultry where cooking losses affect the amount of available
product to be served. The steps in preparing the Cooking Loss Test are very similar to those applied in
preparing the Yield Test.
The following is an example a Cooking Loss standard portion cost form: Hypothetical as cooks are not able to
do this exercise.
Product:___Chicken Breast_____
Weight in Yield %
lbs.
Total Weight
8.0
100
Trim Loss
3.0
37.5
Pre-Cooked Weight
5.0
62.5
Loss in Cooking
1.25
15.6
.25
3.1
Edible Product
3.5
43.8
Number
Portions
Edible
Cost/lb.
Edible Cost
/Portion
Cost
Factor/lb
Cost Factor
per Portion
$9.21
$3.58
$2.285
.888
A chef or food service manager may perform several tests on the same product, cooking it for different times
and temperatures to most effectively evaluate the product yield.
Edible Yield % = The percent of product that is servable. After the meat has been boned, trimmed, and cooked
the amount of servable product in pounds left divided by the As Purchased Weight will give the Edible Yield
Percentage.
Cost Factor per lb. = (Edible Cost per Pound / As Purchased Cost per Pound) X 100
New Edible Cost per Pound = Cost Factor per Pound x New as Purchased Cost per Pound
Now if you have a recipe that calls for beef, peppers and onions you will know how to calculate the cooking
loss for the beef and the edible portion for the green peppers and onions. A standard recipe cost card for
pepper steak will be:
As Purchased
Quantity Unit
EY %
Quantity Unit
TBS
100
1.00
TBS
Oz
100
2.00
1/2
Tsp
100
1/2
Tsp
Invoice
Ingredient
Recipe
Individual
Ingredient Cost
Cost
Unit
Cost
Unit
Base, Chicken
29.97
6 lb
0.16
TBS
0.16
Oz
Couscous
21.55
15 lb
0.09
Oz
0.18
0.50
Tsp
Salt, Iodized
2.32
26 oz
0.00
Tsp
0.01
100
0.50
Tsp
Black pepper
12.87
18 oz
0.06
Tsp
0.03
TBS
80
4.00
TBS
Roma Tomato
21.20
10 lb
0.06
TBS
0.24
TBS
92
2.50
TBS
5.41
#10
0.03
TBS
0.05
Oz
100
0.25
Oz
Feta cheese
3.01
lb
0.19
Oz
0.05
TBS
100
2.00
TBS
Olive oil
16.11
gal
0.06
TBS
0.12
TBS
100
2.00
TBS
Parsley
11.29
10 oz
0.04
TBS
0.07
TBS
100
0.50
TBS
Garlic
7.05
32 oz
0.06
TBS
0.03
1.5
lb
100
1.50
lb
Chic breast 6 oz
48.58
48/6 oz
2.70
lb
4.05
Oz
100
1.00
Oz
Cooking spray
3.43
17 oz
0.20
Oz
0.20
5.19
Portion Cost:
1.30
Additional Cost:
Total Plate Cost:
1.30
Surcharge X1.2X1.33
0.77
2.07
Actual Cost %:
62.8%
WAMCs dining facility is a non-profit business. However in order not to lose money they have to account for
labor, equipment, facility maintenance, and utilities, etc. To do this they charge a surcharge by multiplying
their total plate cost by 1.2 and 1.33.
7. Evaluate and critique the food distribution systems you have observed. Design a
patient/client satisfaction questionnaire and perform an objective quality control study
using control criteria such as food temperature.
This questionnaire was used to evaluate a food item that would be served on the Christmas menu for the first
time. In developing this recipe, the Chief of Production and Service wanted the cook supervisors, cook Forman
and other management to try the new entre and evaluate it for quality. The surveys were kept simple and
asked about appearance, taste, portion size, perceived value, and difficulty of preparation. This questionnaire
is an example of an affective sensory test because the product will be evaluated by a panel with no special
sensory training. It will try to determine if the product will be accepted by the dining facility clientele and if
opinions are favorable or unfavorable. The following is a copy of the survey questions and the responses:
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very
Difficult
A little
Difficult
Neither
A Little
Easy
Very Easy
PREPARATION
5. Was this product difficult to make?
Well designed and analyzed sensory tests can be used to assist the foodservice manager in presenting food
items to the customer that are more likely to succeed.
References for Module VII1. McVety PJ, Marshall SD, Ware BJ. The Menu and the Cycle of Cost Control. Kendall Hunt Publishing; 2009:89109.