Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(t/zs/ts)
Level4
GATE Students
o
o
o
o
.lacob- Reading
Dait- Reading
l)ai"non- Reading
(larin- Reading
High Achievers
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Emma
Erin
Kayla
Hallie
Anna
Kaleb
Bree'L
Behavior Concerns
Cam has a hard time staying focused and motivated on his work. Dan and Gavin have a hard time staying
focused on the tasks because they would rather be reading their library books. The class as a whole is usually
very chatty, and needs to be reminded to stay quiet and listen. Brooklyn is a selective mute, and refuses to speak
except occasionally with Jen.
Classroom Environment:
The SmartBoard is at the front of the classroom, and covers most of the white board space. There is an Elmo at
the teacher's desk. The students' desks are in two E-shapes, with a few pairs of desks at the back of the room.
There is a table at the back of the room for small group instruction. There are student computers on either side
of the classroom.
do?)
Reading: Informational Text Standard 3- Explain events, procedures, ideas, or concepts in a historical,
scientific, or technical text, including what happened and why, based on specific information from the text.
Reading: Informational Text Standard 5- Describe the overall structure (e.g., chronology, comparison,
cause/effect, problem/solution) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in a text or part of text.
Content Walk-Awav: I will make predictions while I read Leah's Ponu.I will also find the problems and solutions
Content Walk-Away: Students will make two different predictions throughout the
story. Students lvill fill out a problem/solution graphic organizer and write a summary
of the story. (SIOP So)
Language Walk-Away: Students will write two different predictions throughout the
fuz
n(lise-'.
I
,Jr)"N?'
l-,
lri.
.l-
r,:..
l-l
tii:ti!; liri''1'l
:l!}.
;
i:.,1:\
fr_r.j
belyl
\ ,
ililq',
Formatiue Assessmenf.' Students are actiuely engaged in answering questions. Students are focused and paying
attention.
M o difi c ation / accommo dations :
tuIason tuill htrue
ear
-W
a /UAd?
Formatiue Assessmenf.' Students actiuely participate in c/ass discussion. Students are corcectla fiUing out their graphic
organizer. Students are writing down their predictions when asked to.
M o difi. c atio n / a c c ommo dations :
::::,::l_:::.:,:krM
Now all of you have written down two of your own predictions. I want you to talk t?f5 sI
predictions. (SIOP 6, r6)See if your predictions were similar or different. It is okay if you answers are different because we
all have different ideas, and different ways of thinking. I will give everyone three minutes to share.
Formatiue Assessmenf.' Obserue as students discuss their predictions with each other.
earrnuff.sutotllJtime.(51OP4.,,,,.
r.:.,r ,'.
ht.s
ac
co
mmo dations :
trtluson i r. :
{"'lui;t
SIOP lndicators (Add SIOP number and description within the lesson plan)
Preparation: 1-Content objectives, 2-Language objectives, 3-Content appropriate, 4-Supplementary materials, 5-Adaptation
TEACHING NOTES
do I need to remember
this lesson?
Euen, smooth pacing.
to complete lesson.
t hour
Reflecting back on this lesson, I wish I would have spent more time on the accommodations and modifications from
the beginning. I feel my lesson would have been more successful if I had a better plan on how to differentiate for each
different student. This assignment has helped me to see that planning and preparing is crucial for a great lesson.
When I taught this lesson I had minimal accommodations. I spent more time on actually writing the lesson then I did
focusing on the students and their needs. This has been an eye opening experience for me because I was able to see how
that does not work. I have learned how important differentiation is, and that it needs to be thought of previous to teaching
the lesson. It does not work to just "wing it" during the lesson.
I believe if I were to teach this lesson again, after making these changes, it would have gone much better. I believe the
students would have been much more engaged. I also feel the lesson would have been more beneficial for the students.
They would have obtained so much more from it.
ELED 3900
Pointsr)
nsatisfactory
Name
Basic
Alignment of
Lesson Plan
Proficient
AllCriteria Met
Distinguished
All Criteria Met and
Exceeded
Below 10 pts.
10-14 points
15-19 points
Alignment is
poor or missing.
mostly aligned.
Good alignment of
all parts or tesson.
29,rotnK---\
4ontent and Language
(
Evidence of
stoP 1-6,7-9,
t6-79 and27-
Most SIOP
features are
Many SIOP
features are
missing.
included.
30
Differentiation
for 3 target
students in
Much of the
differentiation
Some
is
missing.
process and
content
Assessments
Differentiated
Little or no
differentiation of
assessments is
evident
Clear and
specific
Accommodations
are unclear or
differentiation
missing.
differentiation for
these 5 target
(
students is
Wa\
tightly alignedr/
-----_--_<res,{
AI|-SIOPEE uiFed featu
,(learlv addressed and used
in an exceptional manner.
SIOP noted in lesson at the
point of occurrence.
\-/
,P.l
plan.