Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PP vs. Que Que appeals for conviction of sec 68, Prov. Task Force rec. info that a truck il
legally cut lumber pass through ilocos, driver cacao, que owner
Truck was found with coconut slabs, sawn lumber were inserted in between coconut
slabs
The SPO's asked for the documents, que was charge sec 68 and convicted
appealed - assignment of erros
1) no existing rules and regulation which require certain legal docs for possess
ion - argues when cutting is legal he need not be punished
2) violation of consti right searches and seizure
3) violation custodial investi
Tigoy vs. CA rule 45, assailing order a decision of trial court and ca, pp vs. ong and tigoy,
convicting tigoy violating sec 68
Taopa vs. PP -
PP vs. CFI annulment of judg, pp vs. godo, rtc quashed complaint due to erroneous applicati
on, state property. although not owner, he has right to exclude and to the fruit
s
issues: 1) the facts do not charge as an offense
2) w/n rtc has jurisdiction - forest officer arrest, comission or by com
plaint
Case reinstated, petition granted