FACTS: PNB acquired the assets of Pampanga Sugar Mills that were earlier foreclosed by the DBP. It was alleged that PNB organized National Sugar Development Corporation to take ownership and possession of the assets and ultimately to nationalize and consolidate its interest in other PNB controlled sugar mills. PASUMIL engaged the services of Andrada for electric rewinding and repair, most of which were partially paid by PASUMIL, leaving several unpaid accounts with Andrada. PASUMIL, PNB and NASUDECO refused to pay plaintiff. The President of NASUDECO is also the VP of PNB and Andrada besought this official to pay the outstanding obligations of PASUMIL, inasmuch as that PNB and NASUDECO now owned and possessed the assets of PASUMIL. NASUDECO contends that it took over PASUMIL for the purpose of reconditioning the sugar central pursuant to Martial Law and nothing commanded that they were to assume corporate obligations of PASUMIL. The court ordered NASEDECO to pay Andrada. ISSUE: Whether or not PNB should be held liable for PASUMILs debts HELD: No, PNB should not be liable. Piercing the veil of corporate entity may only be allowed if there is control in such a manner that the corporate entity had no separate mind, will, existence on its own, that such control must have been used to commit fraud or a wrong and said control and breach of duty must have proximately caused the injury or unjust loss complained of. In the absence of the foregoing precludes the piercing of the corporate veil. First, other than the fact that the petitioners acquired assets of PASUMIL, there is no showing that their control over it warrants the disregard of corporate personalities. Second, there is no evidence that their juridical personality was used to commit fraud or do a wrong or that the separate corporate entity was used as a mere alter ego, business conduit or instrumentality of another entity or person. Third, respondent was not defrauded or injured when petitioners acquired the assets of PASUMIL.