ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 2° Semester SY 2014-2015 DEAN SALVADORT. CARLOTA UA&B I HISTORICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Development of Administrative Law as a distinct field of public law. 1. Factors responsible for the emergence of administrative agencies. 2. The doctrine of separation of powers and the constitutional position of administrative agencies 4. Definition of Tennis - Admmiatrative Ly 5 aid Aduussitatiy © Cases + Pangasinan. Transportation Lu., Inc.. v. The Pubuc Service Commi: ~ Manila Electric Co.. v. Pasay Transportation Co.. 57 Phil. 600 (1932) - Noblejas v. Teehankee, 23 SCRA 405 (1968) - Garcia v. Macaraig, 39 SCRA. 106 (1972) - In Re: Rodolfo v. Manzano, 166 SCRA 246 (1988) - Puyat v. De Guzman Jr., 113 SCRA 31 (1982) 7 Phi. 221 (ivr 1 CONTROL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Administrative agencies and the executive power of the President - Art. VIL, Ses. 1, 17, Const. . Congressional Oversight Power - See Macalintal v. Comelec. 405 SCRA 693-733 (concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Puno). Carlota, Legislative and Judicial Control of Administrative Decision-making.D. Carlota, The Ombudsman: Its effectivity and visibility amidst ‘bureaucratic abuse and irregularity, 65 Phil. L. J. 12 (1990) E. Cases - Concemed-Officials of the MWSS v. Vasquez, 240 SCRA 502 (1995) ~ Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497 (1995) - BIR v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 115103, April 11, 2002 ~ Office of the Ombudsman v. ENOC, et. al., G.R. Nos. 145957-08, January 25. 2002 ~ Fuentes v. Office of the Ombudsman - Mindanao - G.R. No. 124295, October 23. 2001 ~ Ledesman v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 161629, July 29, 2005 ~ Estarija v. Ranada, 492 SCRA 652 (2006) - Offfice of the Ombudsman vs. Masing - 452 SCRA 253 (2008) - Samson vs. Restrivera, 646 SCRA 481 (2011) m POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES A. Legislative Function 1. Non delegation doctrine ~ Compania General de Tabacco v. Board of Public Utility Commission. 34 Phil. 130019164 - USS. v. Ang Tang Ho 43 Phil. 1 (1922) ~ People v. Vera, 65 Phil 56 (1937) «Pelee v, Auditor General G.R. No. 23825, Dec. 24, 1965, 15 SCRA 569 = Edu v. Ericta 35 SCRA 481 (1970) 1 Agustin v. Edu, No. L-49112, Feb. 2, 1979; 88 SCRA 195 “ fise Telephone Workers Union v. Minister of Labor and Employment. Of SCRA 757 (198 1 Philippine Communications Satellite Corporation, v. Aleuaz, 190 SCRA 218 (1989) ~ Chiongbian v. Orbos, 245 SCRA 253 (1995) 1 Santiago v, COMELEC - 270 SCRA 106 (1997) (Read only the part concerning the non- delegation issue.) _ Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935)- Abakada Guro Party List, etc., et al. v. Exec. Sec, Ermita, et al. GR. no. 168207, Septem’ 2005. Read only the Part concerning the non-delegation issue. - Review Center Association of the Philippines vs. Ermita, 583 SCRA 428 (2009) - A.L.A. Schecter Poultry Corp. v. U.S. 295 U.S. 495 (1935) - Federal Energy Administration v. Al Gonquin SNG, Inc., 426 U.S. 548, 49 L. Ed. 24499 96 SCT 2295 (1976) - White v. Roughton, 530 F2d 750 (CA 71976) 2. Permissible Delegation a. Ascertainment of Fact - Panama Refining Co. Ryan, supra = Lovina v. Moreno G.R. No. L178221, Nov. 29, 1963; 9 SCRA 557 (1963) b. Filing in of details - Alegre v. Collector of Customs, 53 Phil. 394 (1 920) a c. Administrative Rulemaking 1. Book VIL, Administrative Procedure, Secs. 1-9, Administrative Code of 1987 1. Limits on Rule-Making Power - Olsen & Co., Inc. v. Aldanese, 43 Phil. 259 (1922) ~ Syman v. Jacinto, 93 Phil 1093 (1953) - People v. Maceren, No. L-32166, Oct. 18, 1977; 79 SCRA 450 Toledo v. Civil Service Commission, 202 SCRA 507 (1991) | Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, 240 SCRA 368 (1995) “Land Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 249 SCRA 149 (1995) -GMCR, Inc. v. Bell Telecommunications Phil., Inc.,-271 SCRA 790 (1997) - Association of Phil. Coconut Desiccators vs. Phil. Coconut Authority-286 SCRA 109 (199: - Ople vs. Torres - 293 SCRA 141 (1998) ~ Phil. Bank of Communications v. ‘Commissioner of Internal Revenue 302 SCRA 241 (1995 “China Banking Corp., v. Members of the Board of Trustees, Home Development Mutual fund - 307 SCRA 443 (1999)ae ~ Maxima Realty Management and Development Corp. v. Parkway Real Estate Devel Corp. - 442 SCRA 572 (2004) Sanaa i ean) ~ Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEC, 621 SCRA 385 (2010) 2. Publication and affectivity ~ People v. Que Po Lay, 94, Phil. 640 ~ Philippine Blooming Mills v. SSS, G.R. No. 21223, August 31, 1966, 17 SCRA 1077 ~ Tafiada v. Tuvera 146 SCRA 446 ~ Phil. Association of Service Exporters, Inc. v. Torres, 212 SCRA 298 (1992) ~ De Jesus vs. Commission on Audit - 294 SCRA 152 (1998) ~ Republic of the Philippines v. EXPRESS Telecommunications Co., G.R. Nos. 147096 & 147210, January 15,2002 ~ National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms (NASECORE) vs. ERC, GR.No. 163935, Feb. 2, 2006 ~ GMA Network, Inc. vs. MIRCB - 514 SCRA 191 (2007) ~ Republic vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation - 550 SCRA 680 (2008) ~ The Board of Trustees of the GSIS v. Velasco, 641 SCRA 372 (2011) - Book VIL, Secs. 3-8, Administrative Code of 1987 3. Penal Regulations People &. Que Po Lay. 94 Phil €40 (1954) ~ Peopie ¥. Macgien No. L 9 aURa dou 4 Interpret es ~- Hillado v. Collector, 100 Phil. 288 (1956) ~ Victorias Co. v. Social Security Commission G.R. No. 16704, March 17, 1962: 114 Phil. 555 (1962) - Peralta v. Civil Service Commission, 212 SCRA 425 (1992) "5, Examples of rule-making in various agencies | z " Director of Forestry v. Mufioz, G.R. No.-24796, June 28, 23 SCRA 1183 - Sand v. Abad Santos Educational Institution, G.R. No. L-30918, July 19, 1974; 58 SCRA 33 (1974) - es Tobacco Co. v. Director of Patents, L-26803, Oct. 14, 1975; 67 SCRA 287 ~- Rabor v. Civil Service Commission, 244 SCRA 614 (1995) ~ The Conference of Maritime Manning Agencies, Inc. v. POEA, 243 SCRA 666 (1995)te ~ Realty Exchange Venture Corporation v. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 (1994) - GSIS v. Board of Commissioners (Second Division), HLURB, 620 SCRA 249 (2010) d. Fixing of Rates, Wages, Prices - Administrative Code of 1987 See. 9, Book VII ~Panay Autobus Co. v. Phil. Railway Co., 57 Phil 172 (1933) -KMU Labor Center v. Garcia, 239 SCRA 386 (1994) ~ Ynchausti 5.S. Co. v. Public Utility Commission, 42 Phil 621 (1922) - Vigan Electric Co. v. PSC, G. R. No. L-19850, Jan. 30, 1964, 10 SCRA 46 - Phil. Communications Satellite Corp. v. Alcuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1989) ~Manila International Airport Authority v. Airspan Corp. - 445 SCRA 471 (2004) ¢. Licensing Function ~ Secs. 17-18, Book VII, Administrative Code of 1987 = Gonzalo Sy Trading v. Central Bank of the Phil. G.R. No. 41480, April 30. 1976. 70 SCRA 570,(1976) a“ Le - f B. Judicial Function = Sees. 10-15, Book Vil, Admunistrative Code of 1987 as Power fe inste Subpoen L ‘Grperl statutory provision Sec. 13, Book VII, fudmninistrative Code of 1987 ih if vat c 2, Special Statutory Grant = P.D.902-A ~ Evangelista v. Jarencio, L-29274, Nov. 27, 1975, 68 SCRA 99 ~ Guevarra v. Commission on Elections, G-R. No. 12596, July 31, 1958 ~Catura v. CLR, 37 SCRA 303 (1971) ~ Tolentino v. Inciong, G-R. No. L-36385, July 25, 1979 b. Warrants of arrest, Administrative searchesc EEE ~ Art IIl, Sec. 2, 1987 Constitution as compared with Art. IV, Sec. 3, 1973 Constitution ~ Qua Che Gan v. Deportation Board, G. R. No. 10280, Sept. 30, 1963.9 SCRA 27 ~ Vivo v. Montesa G. R. No. 24576, July 29, 1968, 29 SCRA 155 ~ Santos v. Commissioner, 74 SCRA 96 (1976) ~ Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago, 162 SCRA 840 (1988) ~ Lucien Tran Van Nghia v. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989) ~ Salazar v. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145 (1990) ~ Board of Commissioners (CID) v. De la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853 (1991) ~ Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523, 87 8. Ct. 1727, 18 L. Ed. 2930 (1967) ~ See v. Seattle, 387 U.S. 541, 87 S. Ct, 1737, 18 LEd. 2 943 ¢. Imposition of Fines and Penalties - Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214 U.S, 320 (1908) ~ Civil Aeronautics Board v. Philippine Air Lines, Inc, L-40245, April 30. 1975: 63 SCRA 524 (1975) ~ Scoty's Dept. Store v. Micalier, 99 Phil. 762 (1956) -USS. v. Barrias, 11 Phil. 327 (1908) i us - -RCPI v. Board of Communications, No. L-43653, Nov. 29. 1977 Perez vs LPG Refillers Association of the Philippines. Inc... 492 SCRA 63% 29061 Publi, scaring Committee he LLDA .. S.M. Pr: d. (2010) Judicial Determination of Sufficiency of Standards 1. Interest of Law and Order wah - Rubi v, the Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil 661 (1919), 2. Public Interest ~ People v. Rosenthal & Osmefia, 68 Phil 328 (1939) A 3. Justice, equity and substantial Merits of the case : = Intemational hardwood & Veneer Co. v. Pangil Federation, 70 Phil. 602 (1940) 4, What is moral, educational or amusing ~ Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission 236 U.S. 230 (1914) 5. What is sacrilegious?ae 7 ~ Burstyn v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952) 6. Adequate and efficient instruction - PACU v. Secretary, 97 Phil 806 (1955) 7. Reasonableness 2s an implied standard ~ Wisconsin inspection Bureau v. Whitman 196 Wis. 427, 220 M.W. 929 (1928) 8. To promote simplicity, economy or efficiency ~ Cervantes v. Auditor General, 91 Phil 359 (1952) 9. Maintain monetary stability, promote rising level of production and real Income ~ People v. Joliffe, 105 Phil 177 (1959) Iv ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 4 Rook VIF Administrative Procedure Sec 1-26. Administrative Code of 1987 B. In Rule-Making, Price, Wage, o: rate fixing 1. Rules of Procedure 2. Due process : baby ii a. Cardinal primary rights Ang Tibay v. Court of Industrial Relations, 69 Phil 635 (1950) Asprec v. Itchon, G.R. No. 21685, April 30, 1966, 15 SCRA 921 ‘Vinta Maritime Co, Inc. VS. NLRC - 284 SCRA 656 (1998) Bachrach Motor Co., vs. CIR, GR. No. L-26136, October 30, 1978; 86 SCRA 2 UP. Board of Regents v. Court of Appeals 313 SCRA 404 (1999) ‘Zambales Chromite Mining Co. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-49711, Novem 1979 Rivera v. Civil Service Commission, 240 SCRA 43 (1995) American Inter-Fashion Corp. v. Office of the President, 197 SCRA 409 (1991) Pefianco v. Moral 322 SCRA 439 (2000) NAPOLCOM, National Appellate Board and PNP v. Police Chief Inspector 1c: Bernabe, G.R. No. 129914, May 12, 2000 Montemayor v. Bundalian, G.R. 149335, July 1, 2003 ‘Shoppes Manila, Inc., v. NLRC 419 SCRA 354 (2004) Autencio v. Manara, 449 SCRA 46 (2005) Samalio v. Court of Appeals, 454 SCRA 462 (2005) ‘Medina vs. COA - 543 SCRA 684 (2008)Oe - Domingo vs. Rayala - 564 SCRA 90 (2008) | ~ AZ. Amaiz Realty, Inc., v. Office of the President 624 SCRA 494 (2010) - Ganapo v. CSC, 649, SCRA 594 (2011) | ~ © INC Shipmanagement, Inc. v. Moradas - 713 SCRA 475 (2014) | Aguilar v. O'Pallick - 702 SCRA 455 (2013) ~ + Vivo v. Phil. Amusement and Gaming Corp. (PAGCOR) - 709 SCRA 276 (2013 | ~ Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S, 565, 42 L. Ed. 2d 725, 95 S. Ct. 729 (1975) | - Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18, 96 S. Ct. 893 b. Notice and Hearing 1. When required - National Development Co., v. Collector G.R. No. L-19180, Oct. 31, 1963, 9 SCRA (1963) + Bautista v. Workmen's Compensation Commission, No. L-43027, January 31, 1979, 88 SCRA 121 - Equitable Banking Corp. v. NLRC - 273 SCRA 352 (1997) - Felix Uyet.al., v. COA et. al, G.R. No. 130685, March 21, 2000 cals ik - 2. When Not required Suntay v People. 161 Phil 833 (1957) Hnshop ang Se HSK! Mas 92 NBS ws ha He = 2 - Pollution Adjudication Board v. Court of Appeals, 193 SCRA 112 (1991) ¢. Form of aiid Promulgation of J i abi i Indias v. Phil. Iron Mines, 107 Phil 297 (1957). ‘ = Serrano v. PSC, G-R. No. 24165, Aug. 30, 1968, 24 SCRA 867 Bi - Solid Homes, Inc. vs. Lasema - 550 SCRA 613 (2008) i I = Department of Health v. Camposano, 457 SCRA 438 (2005) . = American Tobacco Co, v, Director of patents, L-26803, Oct 14, 1975, 67 SCRA 287 = Albert v. Gangan - 353 SCRA 673 (2001) = Arocha v. Vivo, G.R. No. 24844, Oct. 26, 1967, 21 SCRA 532 = Neria v. Com. of Immigration, G.R. No. 24800, May 27, 1968, 23 SCRA 806 (1968) - Go Yu Tak Wai v. Vivo, No. L-22257, May 23, 1977, 77 SCRA 55 = Sichangco v. The Board of Commissioners of Immigration, G.R. L-23545, Nov. 7. = Realty Exchange Venture Corp. vs. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 (1994) 3. Jurisdiction = Go Tek v. Deportation Board, No. L-23846, Sept. 9, 1977; 70 SCRA 17 (1977) = Guy v. Ignacio, 622 SCRA 678 (2010) = Govs. Ramos - 598 SCRA 266 (2009) = Vera v. Cuevas, Nos. L-33693-94, May 31, 1979; 90 SCRA 379 (1979) = Dela Fuente v. De Veyra, 120 SCRA 451 (1983)Carifio v. Commission on Human Rights, 204 SCRA 483 (1991) Simon, Jr. vs. Commission on Human Rights, 229 SCRA 117 (1994) Laguna Lake Development Authority vs, CA, 231 SCRA 292 (1994) Union Bank of the Philippines v. HLURB, 210 SCRA 558 (1992) Osea vs. Ambrosio, 486 SCRA 599 (2006) Mateo v. Court of Appeals 247 SCRA 284 (1995) Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 270 SCRA 538 (1997) Eristingcol vs. C.A., 582 SCRA 139 (2009) Delta Ventures Kesources Inc., v. Cabato - 327 SCRA 521 (2000) Jesus Lim Arranza, et. al., v. B.F. Homes, Inc. et. al., G.R. No. 131683, June 19, 2000 Cooperative Development Authority v. Dolefil Agrarian Beneficiaries Coop...« al., GR. No. 137489, May 29, 2002 De Jesus v. Commission on Audit, 403 SCRA 666 (2003) CSC vs. Alfonso, 589 SCRA 88 (2009) Shell Philippines Exploration B.V.V. v. Jalos, 630 SCRA 399 (2010) Machado v. Gatdula 612 SCRA 546 (2010) Vda. De Herrera v. Bernardo, 650 SCRA 87 (2011) Pat-og, Sr. v. Civil Service Commission - 697 SCRA 567 (2013) Funa v. Manila Economic and Cultural Office ~ 715 SCRA 247 (2014) Department of Agrarian Reforin v. Trinidad Valley’ Realty and Development Corporation 718 SCRA 4, Administrative and Judicial Proceedings Arising from the same Facts Galang v. Cour of Appeals. G.R. No. 15569. May 30, tye. SCRA Co San v. Director of Patents, G.R. No, 10563, Feb. 23, 1961 ~'/IWillanos v. Subido, G.R. No. L-23169, May 31, 1971, 45 SCRA 142 PNR v. Domingo, G.R. No. L-30772 Oct, 29, 1971, 42 SCRA 142 Tan v. COMELEC, 237 SCRA 353 (1994) “3 Ocampo v. Office of the Ombudsman, 322 SCRA 17 (2000), ns Mirales v. Go- 349 SCRA 596 (2001) Ferrer, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan - 548 SCRA 460 (2008) ‘Acuzar v. Jorolan, 617 SCRA 519 (2010) oeLe ee 5. Rules of Evidence Philippine Movie Pictures Workers Assn. v, Premier Production 92 Phil. 844 (1953) ~ Estate of Florencio Buan v, Pambusco, 99 Phil 373 (1956) ~ Rizal Light Co. v. Mun. of Rizal, G.R. No. 20993, Sept. 28, 1968 (Omit the corporation law part), 24 SCRA 285 ~ Borja v. Moreno, G.R. No. L-16487, July 31, 1964, 11 SCRA 568 > Maceda v. Energy Regulatory Board, 1999 SCRA 454 (1991) ~ Bantolino v. Coca-Cola Boitlers Phils, Inc. 403 SCRA 6999 (2003) ~ Civil Service Commission vs. Colangco - 553 SCRA 640 (2008) v. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ‘Switchmen's Union of North America v, National Mediation Board. 320 U.S. 297 oan) Chevigu LS. lae., ¥, Natual Resources Det Ed. 2" 694, 104 S et 2778 (1984) Forich ve Cornna 280 SCR 4 624 +1008) Antique Sawmill Ine. v. Zayeo, GR No 20031, May 30, t3an FT SUK. 16 = Sotto v. Ruiz, 41 Phil 468 (1921) - Uy, Palomar, G.R. No. 2448, Feb. 28, 1969; 27 SCRA 287 (1969) - Manuel v. Villena, G.R. No. 28218, Feb. 27, 1971; 37 SCRA 745 (1971) - San Miguel Corporation v. Secretary of Labor L-39195, May 16, 1975, 64 SCRA 56 - _UCPB v. E. Guanzon, Inc., 591 SCRA 321 (2009) | | | A. Factors Affecting Finality of Administrative Decisions B. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies = Pascual v. Prov. Board, 106 Phil 446 (1959) = Alzate v. Aldana, G.R. No. 14407, Feb. 29, 1960, 107 Phil 298 (1960) = Cipriano v, Marcelino, G.R. No. L-27793, Feb. 28, 1972, 43 SCRA 291 = Corpuz v, Cuademo, G.R. No. L-17860, March 30, 1962 = De Lara v. Clorivel, G.R. No. L-21653, May 13, 1965, 14 SCRA 269 = Paredes v. C.A. 253 SCRA 126 (1996) = Quasha v, SEC. No. L-47536, May 31,1978; 83 SCRA 557 = Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 255 SCRA 438 (1996) = PAAT v. CA. 266 SCRA 167 (1997) 10 ewba cal - Lopez v. City of Manila 303 SCRA 448 (1999) - Sfavia v-C-A. PCA Governing Board, and Grajeda - GR. No. 100579, June 6, 1 Ae Dept. of Agrarian Reform v. Apex Investment and Financing Corp., 401 SCRA : > Smart Communications, Inc., v. NTC, 408 SCRA 678 (2003) ~ Estrada v. CA. - 442 SCRA 117 (2004) ~ Regino v. Pangasinan College of Science and Technology - 443 SCRA 56 (2004 ~ Flores v. Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Pampanga, 452 SCRA 278 (2005) + CSC v. Dept. of Budget and Management, 464 SCRA 115 (2005) + Obiasca v. Basallote, 613 SCRA 110 (2010) C. Primary Jurisdiction or Preliminary Resort - Texas & Pac, Railway Co. v. Abilene, 204 U.S. 426 (1907) . | ~ Phil. Global Communications, Inc. v. Relova, L-52819, Oct. 2, 1980 ~ Viadad v. RTC of Negros Occidental, Br. 42,227 SCRA 271 (1993) . - ~ Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals. 184 SCRA 426 (1990) ul + Conrad and Co., Inc., v. Court of Appeals, 246 SCRA 691 (1995) Philippine Veterans Bank v C.4.. 322 SCRA 139 (2000) D. Standing to Challenge Ursals CLA. (UT Phil 2uv 1957) - Acting Collector v. CTA, 102 Phil 244 (1958) ~ Lozada v. Commission on Elections, 120 SCRA 337 (1983) is, ie = Oposa v. Factoran, Jr., 224 SCRA 792 (1993) ! - Joya. Presidential Commission on Good Government, 225 SCRA 568 (1993) - Kilos bayan, Inc. v. Guingona, 232 SCRA 110 (1994) a - Kilos Bayan, Inc. v. Morato, 246 SCRA 540 (1995) “ ~ KMU Labor Center v. Garcia, 239 SCRA 386 (1994) ~ Domingo v. Carague, 456 SCRA 450 (2005) ~ ¢Funa v. Manila Economic and Cultural Office - 715 SCRA 247 (2014) ~ Ass'n of Data Processing Service Organization v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 90 S Ct. 827, 25 L. Ed. 2d 184 (1970) - Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 US. 727, 31 L. Ed. 2d 636, 92 SCT, 1361 (1972) ~ Simon v. Eastem Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U'S. 26, 48 L. Ed. 2d 450, 96 S. Ct. 1917 (1976) ~ Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 US 871, 111 L. Ed. 2 695, 110 SCT (1990) ~ Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife - 119 L. Bd.2d 351, 112 SCT. 130 (1992)E. Ripeness t - Abbot Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967) ~ National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 448 F 2d 689 (CADC 1971) em: Vi. MODES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW - Art. IX, A. Common Provisions, Sec. 7 1987 Constitution - B.P. Bldg. 129, Sec. 9, as amended by R.A. No. 7902 (1995) “ ~ Book VII, Sec. 25 Administrative Code of 1987 - Rule 43, Revised Rules of Civil Procedure 298 SCRA 494:1998) v-6U, Jan 30. 1971.27 SCR. 234 he ie} + Azores v. SEC., 252 SCRA 387 (1996) ie ~ Villaruel vs. NLRC - 284 SCRA 399 (1998) : i = Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. General Foods (Phils.), Inc., 401 SCRA 545 : + “ (2003) #t ‘ ~ Cruz v. Gangan, 395 SCRA 711 (2003) i 1 - Hadji-Sirad vs. CSC, 597 SCRA 475 (2009) Mag -s INC Shipmanagement, Inc. v. Moradas ~ 713 SCRA 475 (2014) C. Prohibition = Chua Hiong v. Deportation Board, 96 Phil. 665 (1955) = Co v. The Deportation Board, 78 SCRA 104 (1977) ~ Simon, Jr. v. Commission on Human Rights, 229 SCRA 117 (1994) - Paredes v. Court of Appeals, 253 SCRA 126 (1996) D. Mandamus - Blanco v. Board of Examiners, 46 Phil 190 (1924) ~ Ng Gloc Liu v. Secretary of Foreign Affairs, 85 Phil 842 (1950) ~ Policarpio v. Phil. Veterans Board., 99 Phil. 797 (1956)ae IRE ~ Tan v. Veterans Backpa iss v ty Commission, 105 Phil 377 (19: ~ Pr * a (1959) 3 See Pangasinan v. Reparations Commission, No. L-27448, Nov. 29, 1977; 80 ~ Meralco Securities Corporation v. Savell : I. lano, 117 SCRA 804 (1982) Cruz v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 599 (1996) ~ PRC v. De Guzman - 432 SCRA 505 (2004) E. Declaratory Relief ~ Azajar v. Ardalles, 97 Phil 851 (1955) - De Borja v. Villadolid, 85 Phil 36 (1949) ~ National Dental Supply Co. v. Meer, 90 Phils 265 (1951) - Mirando v. Wellington Ty & Bros. Inc. No. L-44062 Feb. 16, 1978, 81 SCRA 506 F. Habeas Corpus = Mejoff v. Director of Prisons, 90 Phil 70 (1951) = Co v. the Deportation Board 78 SCRA 194 (1977) = Lucien Tran Van Nghia v. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989) . G. Injunction as provisional remedy Collector + Reyes. nef mee 9577 Pineda v. Lantin, G.R. No, 15350. Nov. 30. 1962. 6 SCRA 757 L Valencia - Honda v. San Diego Nocnoc v. Vera, No. L -37737. Feb. 27, 1979. 88 SCRA 529 ile: a ie i Vol EXTENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW A. The Law-Fact distinction = Dauan v. Sec. GR. No, 19547 May 18, 1959,105 Phil 1317 (1959) 1 Reyes Vda. De Santiago v. Reyes, G.R. No. 13115, Feb. 29, 1960, 107 Phil 210 (1960) 1 ‘Aboitiz Shipping Corp. v. Pepeti, G.R. No L-21335, Dec. 17, 1966, 18 SCRA 1028 B. Question of Law = Ortua v. Vicente Singson Encarnacion, 59 Phil 440 (1934)™ 7 Melia v. Mapa, 50 0.6. No.6, 2507 1954 ~ People v. Santos, 63 Phil 300 (asa) ! : Japanese War Notes Claimants v. See. GR. No. 8987, May 23, 1957, 101 Phil $40 (1957) 1 Gyinelv: CIR, G.R. No. 14280, May 3D, 1960, 108 Phil 407 ‘Leary v. Brown Pacific-maxon, le 340, US, 504 (1960) (1951) ~ O'Keeffe v. Smith Associates; 380 US. 359 (1965) C. Question of Fact + Gonzales v. Victory Labor Union, G.R. No. 23256, Oct. 31, 1969, 30 SCRA 47 ~ Suarnaba v. WCC, G.R. No. L-42337, Oct 9, 1978 ~ Acting Commissioner of Customs v. Manila Electric Company; No. L23623, June 30, 1977; 77 SCRA 469 ~ Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank v. Monetary Board, Central Bank of the Philippines, 204 SCRA 767 (1991) ~ Philippine Airlines, Inc. vs. Confessor, 231 SCRA 767 (1994) ~ Manila Electric Co. v. NLRC, 198 SCRA 681 (1991) - Lameyra v. Pangilinan, 322 SCRA 117 (2000) ~ German Marine Agencies, Inc. y. NLRC - 350 SCRA 629 (2001) ~ Velasquez v. Hernandez - 437 SCRA 357 (2004) a i: Civil Service Commission v. Cayobit, G.R. No. 145737, Sept. 3, 2003 ao f the Ombudsman vs. Santos. 486 SCRA 463 (2006) niversai Camera Cup.» NLRB, 349 US. 47419 D. Questions of Dis: Laguna Tayabas Bus. Co. v. PSC, G.R. No. 10903, Jan. 18, 1957 - Manila Trading v. Zulueta, 69 Phil 485 (1940) - Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa sa La Suerte-POITAF v. Noriel; No. L-45475, June 20, 1977, SCRA 414 ~ Federation of Free Workers (Bisig ng Manggagawa sa UTEX) v. Noriel; G.R. No. L 47182-83, Oct. 30, 1978; 86 SCRA 132 (1978) - PLDT v. National Telecommunications Commission, 241 SCRA 486 (1995) vul ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ACTION A. Res Judicata; Finality of Judgment + _ Ipekdjian Merchandising v. CTA, G.R. No. 15430, Sept. 30, 1963, 9 SCRA 72 (1963) - _ Nasipit Lumber Co., Inc. v. NLRC 177 SCRA 93 (1989) - Dulay v. Minister of Natural Resources, 218 SCRA 562 (1993) 14 x- Scart General Insurance Company, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 222 SCRA - pa Electric Co. v. Phil. Consumers Foundation, et.al, G. R. No. 101783, January 23, > Facurav. C.A,,643 SCRA 428 (2011) Heirs of Maximo Derla v. Heirs of Catalina Derla vda. De Hipolito, 648 SCRA 638 (2011) B. Writ of Execution; Mandamus - Apolega v. Hizon, G.R. No. L-23832, Sept. 28, 1968, 25 SCRA 336 (1988) - Vda. De Corpuz v. The Commanding General, Phil. Army, G.R. No.L-44077, Sept. 30, 1978 - Ambrosio v. Salvador, G.R. No. L-47651, Dec. 11, 1978 - Merano v. Tutaan, 15 SCRA 343 (1982) - _ GSIS v. Civil Service Commission, 202 SCRA 799 (1991) - Clavano v. HLURB, G.R. No. 143781, Feb. 27, 2002